Cited by 18EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesStroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryProsthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics

Classification of error-related potentials evoked during stroke rehabilitation training

Open access
Kumar, Akshay, Pirogova, Elena, Mahmoud, Seedahmed S, Fang, Qiang·2021·Journal of Neural Engineering

Abstract

Objective. Error-related potentials (ErrPs) are elicited in the human brain following an error’s perception. Recently, ErrPs have been observed in a novel task situation, i.e. when stroke patients perform upper-limb rehabilitation exercises. These ErrPs can be used to develop assist-as-needed (AAN) robotic stroke rehabilitation systems. However, to date, there is no reported research on assessing the feasibility of using the ErrPs to implement the AAN approach. Hence, in this study, we evaluated and compared the single-trial classification of novel ErrPs using various classical machine learning and deep learning approaches. Approach. Electroencephalogram data of 13 stroke patients recorded while performing an upper-limb physical rehabilitation exercise were used. Two classification approaches, one combining the xDAWN spatial filtering and support vector machines, and the other using a convolutional neural network-based double transfer learning, were utilized. Main results. Results showed that the ErrPs could be detected with a mean area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.838, and a mean accuracy of 0.842, 0.257 above the chance level (p < 0.05), for a within-subject classification. The results indicated the feasibility of using ErrP signals in real-time AAN robot therapy with evidence from the conducted latency analysis, cross-subject classification, and three-class asynchronous classification. Significance. The findings presented support our proposed approach of using ErrPs as a measure to trigger and/or modulate as required the robotic assistance in a real-time human-in-the-loop robotic stroke rehabilitation system.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1741-2552/ac1d32

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Calibration-free cross-subject ErrP classification has been demonstrated with generalized LDA, an xDAWN+RG pipeline with a support vector machine classifier, ensemble classifiers, and online PCA-based pipelines, though without inherent interpretability.

    “Calibration-free cross-subject ErrP classification has been demonstrated with generalized LDA [16], an xDAWN+RG pipeline with a support vector machine classifier [17], ensemble classifiers [18], and online PCA-based pipelines [19], though without inherent interpretability.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 50 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kumar, A., Pirogova, E., Mahmoud, S. S., & Fang, Q.
Affiliations
  • Shantou University (CN)
  • RMIT University (AU)
Corresponding author
Fang, Qiang
Venue
Journal of Neural Engineering
Published
2021-09-02
Volume
18
Issue
5
Pages
056022
ISSN
  • 1741-2552 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2560
OpenAlex
W3193050378
Cited by
17
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4
FWCI
1.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neural Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Funders
Li Ka Shing Foundation (Grant No. 2020LKSFG03C)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Keywords
error-related potentials, stroke rehabilitation, upper limb rehabilitation, EEG classification, support vector machine, convolutional neural networks, error detection
MeSH terms
Stroke Rehabilitation, Brain, Electroencephalography, Humans, Stroke, Support Vector Machine, Brain-Computer Interfaces

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review