CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 7

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Deep Knowledge Tracing

Piech, Chris, Spencer, Jonathan, Huang, Jonathan, Ganguli, Surya, Sahami, Mehran, Guibas, Leonidas, Sohl-Dickstein, Jascha·2015·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1506.05908arXiv 1506.05908
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Knowledge tracing---where a machine models the knowledge of a student as they interact with coursework---is a well established problem in computer supported education. Though effectively modeling student knowledge would have high educational impact, the task has many inherent challenges. In this paper we explore the utility of using Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) to model student learning. The RNN family of models have important advantages over previous methods in that they do not require the explicit encoding of human domain knowledge, and can capture more complex representations of student knowledge. Using neural networks results in substantial improvements in prediction performance on a range of knowledge tracing datasets. Moreover the learned model can be used for intelligent curriculum design and allows straightforward interpretation and discovery of structure in student tasks. These results suggest a promising new line of research for knowledge tracing and an exemplary application task for RNNs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1506.05908

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Code-DKT integrates DKT with the code2vec classification algorithm.

    “Our proposed Deep Code Knowledge Tracing (Code-DKT) model integrates deep knowledge tracing (DKT) [34]) with the code2vec classification algorithm [5].”

    From Code-DKT: A Code-based Knowledge Tracing Model for Programming Tasks (2022) · cites this paper as [34]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Piech, C., Spencer, J., Huang, J., Ganguli, S., Sahami, M., Guibas, L., & Sohl-Dickstein, J.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2015
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1506.05908
arXiv
1506.05908
References
4
Type
Preprint
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/legalcode

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review