CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 520Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesCosmology and Gravitation Theories

The DOI matches its DataCite record; its reference list is not available.

Traversable Wormholes via a Double Trace Deformation

Open access
Gao, Ping, Jafferis, Daniel Louis, Wall, Aron C.·2016·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1608.05687arXiv 1608.05687
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

After turning on an interaction that couples the two boundaries of an eternal BTZ black hole, we find a quantum matter stress tensor with negative average null energy, whose gravitational backreaction renders the Einstein-Rosen bridge traversable. Such a traversable wormhole has an interesting interpretation in the context of ER=EPR, which we suggest might be related to quantum teleportation. However, it cannot be used to violate causality. We also discuss the implications for the energy and holographic entropy in the dual CFT description.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1608.05687

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Very complex computations in the radiation can create wormholes that reach into the black hole interior and pull out the information stored there.

    “The idea is that very complex computations in the radiation can create wormholes that reach into that interior and pull out the information stored there [70], see also [85,86].”

    From The entropy of Hawking radiation (2021) · cites this paper as [86]

    In §5 (Discussion), the paper says a two-boundary coupling makes an existing Einstein–Rosen bridge traversable. Its quantum-information discussion says the boundary interaction can trigger a computation that makes a qubit that fell into the black hole reappear, and compares this with recovery from Hawking radiation. It does not say that complex computations in the radiation themselves create wormholes reaching into the interior. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 68 · Cited by 520

Research works printed but not linked: 57

  1. O. Aharony, M. Berkooz and B. Katz, Non-local effects of multi-trace deformations in the AdS/CFT correspondence, JHEP 10 (2005) 097 [hep-th/0504177] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  2. D. Amati, M. Ciafaloni and G. Veneziano, Effective action and all order gravitational eikonal at Planckian energies, Nucl. Phys. B 403 (1993) 707 [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  3. R.E. Arias, M. Botta Cantcheff and G.A. Silva, Lorentzian AdS, Wormholes and Holography, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 066015 [arXiv:1012.4478] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  4. M. Bañados, M. Henneaux, C. Teitelboim and J. Zanelli, Geometry of the (2 + 1) black hole, Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993) 1506 [Erratum ibid. D 88 (2013) 069902] [gr-qc/9302012] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  5. M. Bañados, C. Teitelboim and J. Zanelli, Black hole in three-dimensional space-time, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 (1992) 1849 [hep-th/9204099] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  6. C. Barcelo and M. Visser, Traversable wormholes from massless conformally coupled scalar fields, Phys. Lett. B 466 (1999) 127 [gr-qc/9908029] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  7. T. Barrella, X. Dong, S.A. Hartnoll and V.L. Martin, Holographic entanglement beyond classical gravity, JHEP 09 (2013) 109 [arXiv:1306.4682] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  8. M. Berkooz, A. Sever and A. Shomer, 'Double trace'deformations, boundary conditions and space-time singularities, JHEP 05 (2002) 034 [hep-th/0112264] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  9. B. Bhawal and S. Kar, Lorentzian wormholes in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet theory, Phys. Rev. D 46 (1992) 2464 [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  10. R. Bousso, A covariant entropy conjecture, JHEP 07 (1999) 004 [hep-th/9905177] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  11. R. Bousso, Z. Fisher, S. Leichenauer and A.C. Wall, Quantum focusing conjecture, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 064044 [arXiv:1506.02669] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  12. P. Breitenlohner and D.Z. Freedman, Stability in gauged extended supergravity, Annals Phys. 144 (1982) 249 [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  13. W. Bunting, Z. Fu and D. Marolf, A coarse-grained generalized second law for holographic conformal field theories, Class. Quant. Grav. 33 (2016) 055008 [arXiv:1509.00074] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  14. X.O. Camanho, J.D. Edelstein, J. Maldacena and A. Zhiboedov, Causality Constraints on Corrections to the Graviton Three-Point Coupling, JHEP 02 (2016) 020 [arXiv:1407.5597] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  15. S. Carlip, The (2 + 1)-dimensional black hole, Class. Quant. Grav. 12 (1995) 2853 [gr-qc/9506079] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  16. X. Dong, D. Harlow and A.C. Wall, Reconstruction of Bulk Operators within the Entanglement Wedge in Gauge-Gravity Duality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 021601 [arXiv:1601.05416] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  17. X. Dong and A. Lewkowycz, Entropy, Extremality, Euclidean Variations and the Equations of Motion, arXiv:1705.08453 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  18. N. Engelhardt and A.C. Wall, Quantum Extremal Surfaces: Holographic Entanglement Entropy beyond the Classical Regime, JHEP 01 (2015) 073 [arXiv:1408.3203] [INSPIRE]. JHEP12(2017)151 · DOI · Paper page
  19. T. Faulkner, R.G. Leigh, O. Parrikar and H. Wang, Modular Hamiltonians for Deformed Half-Spaces and the Averaged Null Energy Condition, JHEP 09 (2016) 038 [arXiv:1605.08072] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  20. T. Faulkner, A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena, Quantum corrections to holographic entanglement entropy, JHEP 11 (2013) 074 [arXiv:1307.2892] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  21. E.E. Flanagan, D. Marolf and R.M. Wald, Proof of classical versions of the Bousso entropy bound and of the generalized second law, Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 084035 [hep-th/9908070] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  22. N. Graham and K.D. Olum, Achronal averaged null energy condition, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 064001 [arXiv:0705.3193] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  23. R. Haag, N.M. Hugenholtz and M. Winnink, On the equilibrium states in quantum statistical mechanics, Commun. Math. Phys. 5 (1967) 215 [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  24. P. Hayden and J. Preskill, Black holes as mirrors: Quantum information in random subsystems, JHEP 09 (2007) 120 [arXiv:0708.4025] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  25. D. Hochberg and M. Visser, Null energy condition in dynamic wormholes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 (1998) 746 [gr-qc/9802048] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  26. D.M. Hofman, D. Li, D. Meltzer, D. Poland and F. Rejon-Barrera, A Proof of the Conformal Collider Bounds, JHEP 06 (2016) 111 [arXiv:1603.03771] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  27. D.M. Hofman and J. Maldacena, Conformal collider physics: Energy and charge correlations, JHEP 05 (2008) 012 [arXiv:0803.1467] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  28. V.E. Hubeny, M. Rangamani and T. Takayanagi, A covariant holographic entanglement entropy proposal, JHEP 07 (2007) 062 [arXiv:0705.0016] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  29. I. Ichinose and Y. Satoh, Entropies of scalar fields on three-dimensional black holes, Nucl. Phys. B 447 (1995) 340 [hep-th/9412144] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  30. W. Israel, Thermo field dynamics of black holes, Phys. Lett. A 57 (1976) 107 [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  31. W.R. Kelly and A.C. Wall, Holographic proof of the averaged null energy condition, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 106003 [arXiv:1408.3566] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  32. J. Koeller and S. Leichenauer, Holographic Proof of the Quantum Null Energy Condition, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 024026 [arXiv:1512.06109] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  33. E.-A. Kontou and K.D. Olum, Averaged null energy condition in a classical curved background, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 064009 [arXiv:1212.2290] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  34. E.-A. Kontou and K.D. Olum, Proof of the averaged null energy condition in a classical curved spacetime using a null-projected quantum inequality, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 124009 [arXiv:1507.00297] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  35. J. Maldacena and L. Susskind, Cool horizons for entangled black holes, Fortsch. Phys. 61 (2013) 781 [arXiv:1306.0533] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  36. J.M. Maldacena, Eternal black holes in anti-de Sitter, JHEP 04 (2003) 021 [hep-th/0106112] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  37. D. Marolf and A.C. Wall, Eternal black holes and superselection in AdS/CFT, Class. Quant. Grav. 30 (2013) 025001 [arXiv:1210.3590] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  38. M.S. Morris and K.S. Thorne, Wormholes in space-time and their use for interstellar travel: A tool for teaching general relativity, Am. J. Phys. 56 (1988) 395 [INSPIRE]. JHEP12(2017)151 · DOI
  39. M.S. Morris, K.S. Thorne and U. Yurtsever, Wormholes, time machines and the weak energy condition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61 (1988) 1446 [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  40. T. Numasawa, N. Shiba, T. Takayanagi and K. Watanabe, EPR pairs, local projections and quantum teleportation in holography, JHEP 08 (2016) 077 [arXiv:1604.01772] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  41. K. Papadodimas and S. Raju, An infalling observer in AdS/CFT, JHEP 10 (2013) 212 [arXiv:1211.6767] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  42. L. Parker and D. Toms, Quantum field theory in curved spacetime: quantized field(s an)d gravity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge U.K. (2009).
  43. S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 181602 [hep-th/0603001] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  44. M.J. Schlosser, Multiple hypergeometric series: Appell series and beyond, in Computer Algebra in Quantum Field Theory, Springer, Heidelberg Germany (2013), pg. 305.
  45. S.H. Shenker and D. Stanford, Black holes and the butterfly effect, JHEP 03 (2014) 067 [arXiv:1306.0622] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  46. S.N. Solodukhin, Restoring unitarity in BTZ black hole, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 064006 [hep-th/0501053] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  47. A. Strominger and D.M. Thompson, A Quantum Bousso bound, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 044007 [hep-th/0303067] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  48. L. Susskind, ER=EPR, GHZ and the consistency of quantum measurements, Fortsch. Phys. 64 (2016) 72 [arXiv:1412.8483] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  49. M. Thibeault, C. Simeone and E.F. Eiroa, Thin-shell wormholes in Einstein-Maxwell theory with a Gauss-Bonnet term, Gen. Rel. Grav. 38 (2006) 1593 [gr-qc/0512029] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  50. W.G. Unruh, Notes on black hole evaporation, Phys. Rev. D 14 (1976) 870 [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  51. M. Visser, Lorentzian wormholes: From Einstein to Hawking, AIP Press, College Park U.S.A. (1996).
  52. M. Visser, S. Kar and N. Dadhich, Traversable wormholes with arbitrarily small energy condition violations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 (2003) 201102 [gr-qc/0301003] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  53. A.C. Wall, Ten proofs of the generalized second law, JHEP 06 (2009) 021 [arXiv:0901.3865] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  54. A.C. Wall, Proving the Achronal Averaged Null Energy Condition from the Generalized Second Law, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 024038 [arXiv:0910.5751] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  55. A.C. Wall, A proof of the generalized second law for rapidly changing fields and arbitrary horizon slices, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 104049 [arXiv:1105.3445] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  56. A.C. Wall, The generalized second law implies a quantum singularity theorem, Class. Quant. Grav. 30 (2013) 165003 [Erratum ibid. 30 (2013) 199501] [arXiv:1010.5513] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  57. E. Witten, Multitrace operators, boundary conditions and AdS/CFT correspondence, hep-th/0112258 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv

Metadata

Authors
Gao, P., Jafferis, D. L., & Wall, A. C.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Institute for Advanced Study (US)
Corresponding author
Jafferis, Daniel Louis
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2016
Volume
2017
Issue
12
ISSN
1029-8479 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1608.05687
arXiv
1608.05687
OpenAlex
W2517332908
Cited by
520
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 86 · 2020: 70 · 2019: 79 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 1
FWCI
26.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of High Energy Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Science Foundation (1352084, 1314311, PHY-131-4311)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Keywords
traversable wormholes, double-trace deformations, gravitational backreaction, Einstein-Rosen bridge, ER=EPR, quantum teleportation, causality violation, holographic entropy, AdS/CFT correspondence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review