The DOI matches its DataCite record; 21 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the (im)possibility of fairness
Open accessAbstract
What does it mean for an algorithm to be fair? Different papers use different notions of algorithmic fairness, and although these appear internally consistent, they also seem mutually incompatible. We present a mathematical setting in which the distinctions in previous papers can be made formal. In addition to characterizing the spaces of inputs (the "observed" space) and outputs (the "decision" space), we introduce the notion of a construct space: a space that captures unobservable, but meaningful variables for the prediction. We show that in order to prove desirable properties of the entire decision-making process, different mechanisms for fairness require different assumptions about the nature of the mapping from construct space to decision space. The results in this paper imply that future treatments of algorithmic fairness should more explicitly state assumptions about the relationship between constructs and observations.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“each technical definition carry strong values assumptions which can often be in tension with each other (Friedler et al., 2016; Kleinberg et al., 2017).”
From Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries (2019) · cites this paper as Friedler et al., 2016
In the citing paper
“Recent works expose the impossibility of simultaneously satisfying multiple non-discriminatory objectives, such as equalized opportunity and parity mistreatment [10, 19, 27].”
From Marrying Fairness and Explainability in Supervised Learning (2022) · cites this paper as [19]
Citations
Cites
Grit: perseverance and passion for long-term goals
Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087 · Cited by 6,911
Dwork, C., Hardt, M., Pitassi, T., Reingold, O., & Zemel, R. (2012) · Proceedings of the 3rd Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference · doi:10.1145/2090236.2090255 · Cited by 3,501
Certifying and Removing Disparate Impact
Feldman, M., Friedler, S. A., Moeller, J., Scheidegger, C., & Venkatasubramanian, S. (2015) · Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2783258.2783311 · Cited by 1,827
Self-citation(2013) · Cited by 1,126
Duckworth, A. L., & Yeager, D. S. (2015) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x15584327 · Cited by 993
Three naive Bayes approaches for discrimination-free classification.
Calders, T., & Verwer, S. (2010) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-010-0190-x · Cited by 764
Efficient noise-tolerant learning from statistical queries
Kearns, M. J. (1998) · Journal of the ACM · doi:10.1145/293347.293351 · Cited by 679
Personality Psychology and Economics
Almlund, M., Duckworth, A. L., Heckman, J., & Kautz, T. (2011) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w16822 · Cited by 540 · cited 1×
“Personal qualities, such as self-control, growth mind-set, and grit, are known to be determining factors in later success [2].”
BackgroundGromov–Wasserstein Distances and the Metric Approach to Object Matching
Mémoli, F. (2011) · Foundations of Computational Mathematics · doi:10.1007/s10208-011-9093-5 · Cited by 519
Classifying without discriminating
Kamiran, F., & Calders, T. (2009) · 2009 2nd International Conference on Computer, Control and Communication · doi:10.1109/ic4.2009.4909197 · Cited by 409
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 265
Getting AI Right: Introductory Notes on AI & Society
Manyika, J. (2022) · Daedalus · doi:10.1162/daed_e_01897 · Cited by 54
What Can Political Philosophy Teach Us about Algorithmic Fairness?
Binns, R. (2018) · IEEE Security & Privacy · doi:10.1109/msp.2018.2701147 · Cited by 47
Survey on fairness notions and related tensions
Alves, G. T., Bernier, F., Couceiro, M., Makhlouf, K., Catuscia Palamidessi, A., & Zhioua, S. (2023) · EURO Journal on Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.ejdp.2023.100033 · Cited by 47
Marrying Fairness and Explainability in Supervised Learning
Grabowicz, P. A., Perello, N., & Mishra, A. (2022) · 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533236 · Cited by 37
Optimized Data Pre-Processing for Discrimination PreventionPreprint
Calmon, F. P., Wei, D., Ramamurthy, K. N., & Varshney, K. R. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1704.03354 · Cited by 37
Artificial Intelligence in a Structurally Unjust Society
Lin, T.-A., & Chen, P.-H. C. (2022) · Feminist Philosophy Quarterly · doi:10.5206/fpq/2022.3/4.14191 · Cited by 44
Demographic Fairness in Biometric Systems: What Do the Experts Say?
Rathgeb, C., Drozdowski, P., Frings, D., Damer, N., & Busch, C. (2022) · IEEE Technology and Society Magazine · doi:10.1109/mts.2022.3217700 · Cited by 43
The Legal and Political Implications of AI Bias: An International Comparative Study
Ness, S., Sarker, M., Volkivskyi, M., & Nerd, N. S. (2024) · American Journal of Computing and Engineering · doi:10.47672/ajce.1879 · Cited by 34
Label-Imbalanced and Group-Sensitive Classification under OverparameterizationPreprint
Kini, G. R., Paraskevas, O., Oymak, S., & Thrampoulidis, C. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.01550 · Cited by 40
It's COMPASlicated: The Messy Relationship between RAI Datasets and Algorithmic Fairness BenchmarksPreprint
Bao, M., Zhou, A., Zottola, S. A., Brubach, B., Desmarais, S. L., Horowitz, A., Lum, K., & Venkatasubramanian, S. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.05498 · Cited by 94
Self-citationImproving Fairness via Federated LearningPreprint
Zeng, Y., Chen, H., & Lee, K. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.15545 · Cited by 34
Data Pre-Processing for Discrimination Prevention: Information-Theoretic Optimization and Analysis
Calmon, F. D. P., Wei, D., Vinzamuri, B., Ramamurthy, K. N., & Varshney, K. R. (2018) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/jstsp.2018.2865887 · Cited by 33
Mccradden, M., Odusi, O., Joshi, S., Akrout, I., Ndlovu, K., Glocker, B., Maicas, G., Liu, X., Mazwi, M., Garnett, T., et al. (2023) · 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3593013.3594096 · Cited by 33
Dimensions of Diversity in Human Perceptions of Algorithmic Fairness
Grgić-Hlača, N., Lima, G., Weller, A., & Redmiles, E. M. (2022) · ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization (EAAMO) · doi:10.1145/3551624.3555306 · Cited by 55
High Tech, High Risk: Tech Ethics Lessons for the COVID-19 Pandemic Response
Moss, E., & Metcalf, J. (2020) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2020.100102 · Cited by 34
Two Simple Ways to Learn Individual Fairness Metrics from DataPreprint
Mukherjee, D., Yurochkin, M., Banerjee, M., & Sun, Y. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.11439 · Cited by 39
Vetrò, A., Torchiano, M., & Mecati, M. (2021) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2021.101619 · Cited by 42
Lewicki, K., Lee, M. S. A., Cobbe, J., & Singh, J. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3581463 · Cited by 30
Towards Formal Fairness in Machine Learning
Ignatiev, A., Cooper, M., Siala, M., Hébrard, E., & Marques-Silva, J. P. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58475-7_49 · Cited by 36
An Automated Toxicity Classification on Social Media Using LSTM and Word Embedding
Alsharef, A., Aggarwal, K., Sonia, S., Koundal, D., Alyami, H., & Ameyed, D. (2022) · Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience · doi:10.1155/2022/8467349 · Cited by 32
RetractedFairness in Ranking: A SurveyPreprint
Zehlike, M., Yang, K., & Stoyanovich, J. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.14000 · Cited by 114
What-is and How-to for Fairness in Machine Learning: A Survey, Reflection, and Perspective
Tang, Z., Zhang, J., & Zhang, K. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3597199 · Cited by 42
Blind Justice: Fairness with Encrypted Sensitive AttributesPreprint
Kilbertus, N., Gascón, A., Kusner, M. J., Veale, M., Gummadi, K. P., & Weller, A. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1806.03281 · Cited by 44
Classification with Fairness Constraints: A Meta-Algorithm with Provable GuaranteesPreprint
Celis, L. E., Huang, L., Keswani, V., & Vishnoi, N. K. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1806.06055 · Cited by 30
Leveraging Expert Consistency to Improve Algorithmic Decision Support
De‐Arteaga, M., Jeanselme, V., Dubrawski, A. W., & Chouldechova, A. (2025) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2022.01576 · Cited by 53
Conceptor Debiasing of Word Representations Evaluated on WEAT
Karve, S., Ungar, L., & Sedoc, J. (2019) · Workshop on Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing (GeBNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/w19-3806 · Cited by 29
Fair Prediction with Endogenous Behavior
Jung, C., Kannan, S., Lee, C., Pai, M. M., Roth, A., & Vohra, R. (2020) · ACM Conference on Economics and Computation (EC) · doi:10.1145/3391403.3399473 · Cited by 34
Mhasawade, V., & Chunara, R. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society · doi:10.1145/3461702.3462587 · Cited by 30
Fairness-Aware Machine Learning: Practical Challenges and Lessons Learned
Bird, S., Hutchinson, B., Kenthapadi, K., Kıcıman, E., & Mitchell, M. (2019) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3308560.3320086 · Cited by 26
Integrating Technical and Legal Concepts of Privacy
Sokolovska, A., & Kocarev, L. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2836184 · Cited by 24
FairPrep: Promoting Data to a First-Class Citizen in Studies on Fairness-Enhancing InterventionsPreprint
Schelter, S., He, Y., Khilnani, J., & Stoyanovich, J. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1911.12587 · Cited by 39
Meritocratic Fairness for Infinite and Contextual Bandits
Joseph, M., Kearns, M., Morgenstern, J., Neel, S., & Roth, A. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society · doi:10.1145/3278721.3278764 · Cited by 24
Making Existing Clusterings Fairer: Algorithms, Complexity Results and Insights
Davidson, I. A. K., & Ravi, S. S. (2020) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v34i04.5783 · Cited by 23
Fairly evaluating and scoring items in a data set
Asudeh, A., & Jagadish, H. V. (2020) · Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment · doi:10.14778/3415478.3415566 · Cited by 23
On the Controllability of Artificial Intelligence: An Analysis of Limitations
Yampolskiy, R. V. (2022) · Journal of Cyber Security and Mobility · doi:10.13052/jcsm2245-1439.1132 · Cited by 58
Academic performance prediction in a gender-imbalanced environment
Sapieżyński, P., Kassarnig, V., & Wilson, C. (2018) · doi:10.18122/b20q5r · Cited by 23
Predicting domestic abuse (fairly) and police risk assessment
Turner, E., Brown, G., & Medina-Ariza, J. (2022) · Psychosocial Intervention · doi:10.5093/pi2022a11 · Cited by 22
Social-minded Measures of Data Quality
Pitoura, E. (2020) · Journal of Data and Information Quality · doi:10.1145/3404193 · Cited by 26
Arbitrariness and Social Prediction: The Confounding Role of Variance in Fair Classification
Cooper, A. F., Lee, K., Choksi, M. Z., Barocas, S., De, C., Grimmelmann, J., Kleinberg, J. M., Sen, S., & Zhang, B. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i20.30203 · Cited by 22
Fast and fair simultaneous confidence bands for functional parameters
Liebl, D., & Reimherr, M. (2019) · Journal of The Royal Statistical Society Series B-statistical Methodology · doi:10.1093/jrsssb/qkad026 · Cited by 37
A Comparative Assessment and Synthesis of Twenty Ethics Codes on AI and Big Data
Loi, M., Heitz, C., & Christen, M. (2020) · IEEE Swiss Conference on Data Science (SDS) · doi:10.1109/sds49233.2020.00015 · Cited by 24
Avoiding Disparity Amplification under Different Worldviews
Yeom, S., & Tschantz, M. C. (2021) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445892 · Cited by 36
Gaba, A., Kaufman, Z., Cheung, J., Shvakel, M., Hall, K. W., Brun, Y., & Xiong, C. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2023.3327192 · Cited by 26
The Possibility of Fairness: Revisiting the Impossibility Theorem in Practice
Bell, A., Bynum, L., Drushchak, N., Zakharchenko, T., Rosenblatt, L., & Stoyanovich, J. (2023) · 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3593013.3594007 · Cited by 21
Fairness-Aware Range Queries for Selecting Unbiased Data
Shetiya, S., Swift, I. P., Asudeh, A., & Das, G. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE) · doi:10.1109/icde53745.2022.00111 · Cited by 20
Repairing Decision-Making Programs Under Uncertainty
Albarghouthi, A., D’Antoni, L., & Drews, S. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-63387-9_9 · Cited by 19
Guevara-Gómez, A., Alcarazo, L. O. D. Z., & Criado, J. I. (2021) · Information Polity · doi:10.3233/ip-200299 · Cited by 21
Enforcing Group Fairness in Algorithmic Decision Making: Utility Maximization Under Sufficiency
Baumann, J., Hannák, A., & Heitz, C. (2022) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3531146.3534645 · Cited by 27
Debiaser for Multiple Variables to enhance fairness in classification tasks
d’Aloisio, G., D’Angelo, A., Marco, A. D., & Stilo, G. (2022) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2022.103226 · Cited by 18
Evaluating Fairness of Automated Scoring in Educational Measurement
Johnson, M., & McCaffrey, D. F. (2023) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003278658-12 · Cited by 18
To Split or not to Split: The Impact of Disparate Treatment in Classification
Wang, H., Hsu, H., Díaz, M., & Calmon, F. P. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2021.3075415 · Cited by 19
On conditional parity as a notion of non-discrimination in machine learningPreprint
Ritov, Y., Sun, Y., & Zhao, R. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.08519 · Cited by 18
The Authority of "Fair" in Machine LearningPreprint
Skirpan, M. W., & Gorelick, M. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.09976 · Cited by 28
Algorithmic bias and racial inequality: a critical review
Kasy, M. (2024) · Oxford Review of Economic Policy · doi:10.1093/oxrep/grae031 · Cited by 22
Disparate Vulnerability to Membership Inference Attacks
Kulynych, B., Yaghini, M., Cherubin, G., Veale, M., & Troncoso, C. (2021) · Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies · doi:10.2478/popets-2022-0023 · Cited by 73
Decoupled classifiers for fair and efficient machine learningPreprint
Dwork, C., Immorlica, N., Kalai, A. T., & Leiserson, M. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1707.06613 · Cited by 17
The Role of Protected Class Word Lists in Bias Identification of Contextualized Word Representations
Sedoc, J., & Ungar, L. (2019) · Workshop on Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing (GeBNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/w19-3808 · Cited by 19
Automated Journalism as a Source of and a Diagnostic Device for Bias in Reporting
Leppänen, L., Tuulonen, H., & Sirén‐Heikel, S. (2020) · Media and Communication · doi:10.17645/mac.v8i3.3022 · Cited by 19
Szafran, D., & Bach, R. L. (2024) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-024-09684-y · Cited by 20
FAIRVIS: Visual Analytics for Discovering Intersectional Bias in Machine Learning
Cabrera, Á. A., Epperson, W., Hohman, F., Kahng, M., Morgenstern, J., & Chau, D. H. (2019) · 2019 IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST) · doi:10.1109/vast47406.2019.8986948 · Cited by 14
Taming Technical Bias in Machine Learning Pipelines
Schelter, S., & Stoyanovich, J. (2020) · UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) · Cited by 14
Fair Learning in Markovian Environments.Preprint
Jabbari, S., Joseph, M., Kearns, M. J., Morgenstern, J., & Roth, A. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 14
Learning from Outcomes: Evidence-Based Rankings
Dwork, C., Kim, M. P., Reingold, O., Rothblum, G. N., & Yona, G. (2019) · Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science · doi:10.1109/focs.2019.00016 · Cited by 15
Causality-Aided Trade-Off Analysis for Machine Learning Fairness
Ji, Z., Ma, P., Wang, S., & Li, Y. (2023) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) · doi:10.1109/ase56229.2023.00105 · Cited by 13
Algorithmic Fairness in Mortgage Lending: From Absolute Conditions to Relational Trade-OffsPreprint
Lee, M. S. A., & Floridi, L. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3559407 · Cited by 13
Fairness and Discrimination in Information Access SystemsPreprint
Ekstrand, M. D., Das, A., Burke, R., & Díaz, F. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 13
Fair Machine Learning in Healthcare: A Review
Feng, Q., Du, M., Zou, N., & Hu, X. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2206.14397 · Cited by 12
On the independence of association bias and empirical fairness in language models
Cabello, L., Jørgensen, A. K., & Søgaard, A. (2023) · 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3593013.3594004 · Cited by 14
The Butterfly Effect in Artificial Intelligence Systems: Implications for AI Bias and Fairness
Ferrara, E. (2023) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4614234 · Cited by 129
Grgić-Hlača, N., Castelluccia, C., & Gummadi, K. P. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing · doi:10.1609/hcomp.v10i1.21989 · Cited by 13
Fairness Under Feature Exemptions: Counterfactual and Observational Measures
Dutta, S., Venkatesh, P., Mardziel, P., Datta, A., & Grover, P. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2021.3103206 · Cited by 14
Ethical and Socially-Aware Data Labels
Beretta, E., Vetrò, A., Lepri, B., & De Martin, J. C. (2019) · Communications in Computer and Information Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-11680-4_30 · Cited by 6
When More Data Lead Us Astray: Active Data Acquisition in the Presence of Label Bias
Li, Y., De‐Arteaga, M., & Saar‐Tsechansky, M. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing · doi:10.1609/hcomp.v10i1.21994 · Cited by 12
Stoyanovich, J., Howe, B., Jagadish, H. V., & Miklau, G. (2018) · Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment · doi:10.14778/3229863.3240494 · Cited by 9
Algorithmic Fairness in Online Information Mediating Systems
Koene, A. R., Vallejos, E. P., Ceppi, S., Rovatsos, M., Webb, H., Patel, M., Jirotka, M. D., & Lane, G. (2017) · ACM Web Science Conference (WebSci) · doi:10.1145/3091478.3098864 · Cited by 10
Quantifying Program BiasPreprint
Albarghouthi, A., D’Antoni, L., Drews, S., & Nori, A. V. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1702.05437 · Cited by 10
Towards the Right Kind of Fairness in AIPreprint
Ruf, B., & Detyniecki, M. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2102.08453 · Cited by 30
Social Responsibility of Algorithms: An Overview
Tsoukiàs, A. (2021) · Integrated series on information systems/Integrated series in information systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-70377-6_9 · Cited by 9
Access to Population-Level Signaling as a Source of Inequality
Immorlica, N., Ligett, K., & Ziani, J. (2019) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3287560.3287579 · Cited by 8
Debiasing representations by removing unwanted variation due to protected attributesPreprint
Bower, A., Niss, L., Sun, Y., & Vargo, A. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1807.00461 · Cited by 9
Bayamiloglu, E., Baraliuc, I., Janssens, L., & Hildebrandt, M. (2018) · Amsterdam University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctvhrd092 · Cited by 13
Counterfactual fairness: removing direct effects through regularizationPreprint
Stefano, P. G. D., Hickey, J. M., & Vasileiou, V. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2002.10774 · Cited by 28
Technologies for Trustworthy Machine Learning: A Survey in a Socio-Technical ContextPreprint
Toreini, E., Aitken, M., Coopamootoo, K., Elliott, K., González-Zelaya, V., Missier, P., Ng, M., & van Moorsel, A. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.08911 · Cited by 24
On Controllability of AIPreprint
Yampolskiy, R. V. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2008.04071 · Cited by 8
What is fair? Proxy discrimination vs. demographic disparities in insurance pricingPreprint
Lindholm, M., Richman, R., Tsanakas, A., & Wüthrich, M. V. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4436409 · Cited by 8
Johnson, B., Bartola, J., Angell, R., Witty, S., Giguere, S., & Brun, Y. (2023) · EURO Journal on Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.ejdp.2023.100031 · Cited by 18
On the trade-off between ranking effectiveness and fairness
Melucci, M. (2023) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122709 · Cited by 7
Johnson, B., Bartola, J., Angell, R., Keith, K. A., Witty, S., Giguere, S., & Brun, Y. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.09951 · Cited by 7
Federated Learning with Local Fairness Constraints
Zeng, Y., Chen, H., & Lee, K. (2023) · International Symposium on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/isit54713.2023.10206590 · Cited by 6
Fairness of Scoring in Online Job Marketplaces
Elbassuoni, S., Amer-Yahia, S., & Ghizzawi, A. (2020) · ACM/IMS Transactions on Data Science · doi:10.1145/3402883 · Cited by 6
Benchmarking Four Approaches to Fairness-Aware Machine Learning
Hamilton, E. P. (2017) · Cited by 6
Abiteboul, S., & Stoyanovich, J. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1903.03683 · Cited by 6
Fair Division Without Disparate ImpactPreprint
Peysakhovich, A., & Kroer, C. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1906.02775 · Cited by 6
Fair PipelinesPreprint
Bower, A., Kitchen, S. N., Niss, L., Strauss, M. J., Vargas, A., & Venkatasubramanian, S. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 6
Self-citationLee, M. S. A., Floridi, L., & Singh, J. P. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3679975 · Cited by 6
Multi-objective Asynchronous Successive HalvingPreprint
Schmucker, R., Donini, M., Zafar, M. B., Salinas, D., & Archambeau, C. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.12639 · Cited by 31
Ahmad, M. A., Eckert, C., Allen, C. M. B., Kumar, V., Hu, J., & Teredesai, A. M. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI) · doi:10.1109/ichi52183.2021.00104 · Cited by 5
Exploring Fairness of Ranking in Online Job Marketplaces
Elbassuoni, S., Amer-Yahia, S., Atie, C. E., Ghizzawi, A., & Oualha, B. (2019) · HAL · doi:10.5441/002/edbt.2019.77 · Cited by 5
Towards Certifying Trustworthy Machine Learning Systems
Yap, R. H. C. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-73959-1_7 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Friedler, S. A., Scheidegger, C., & Venkatasubramanian, S.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2016
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1609.07236
- OpenAlex
- W2524301210
- Cited by
- 247
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Keywords
- algorithmic fairness, fairness definitions, decision space, impossibility results, fairness assumptions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
