The DOI matches its DataCite record; 21 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the (im)possibility of fairness
Open accessAbstract
What does it mean for an algorithm to be fair? Different papers use different notions of algorithmic fairness, and although these appear internally consistent, they also seem mutually incompatible. We present a mathematical setting in which the distinctions in previous papers can be made formal. In addition to characterizing the spaces of inputs (the "observed" space) and outputs (the "decision" space), we introduce the notion of a construct space: a space that captures unobservable, but meaningful variables for the prediction. We show that in order to prove desirable properties of the entire decision-making process, different mechanisms for fairness require different assumptions about the nature of the mapping from construct space to decision space. The results in this paper imply that future treatments of algorithmic fairness should more explicitly state assumptions about the relationship between constructs and observations.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“each technical definition carry strong values assumptions which can often be in tension with each other (Friedler et al., 2016; Kleinberg et al., 2017).”
From Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries (2019) · cites this paper as Friedler et al., 2016
In the citing paper
“Recent works expose the impossibility of simultaneously satisfying multiple non-discriminatory objectives, such as equalized opportunity and parity mistreatment [10, 19, 27].”
From Marrying Fairness and Explainability in Supervised Learning (2022) · cites this paper as [19]
Citations
Cites
Grit: perseverance and passion for long-term goals
Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087 · Cited by 6,911
Dwork, C., Hardt, M., Pitassi, T., Reingold, O., & Zemel, R. (2012) · Proceedings of the 3rd Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference · doi:10.1145/2090236.2090255 · Cited by 3,501
Certifying and Removing Disparate Impact
Feldman, M., Friedler, S. A., Moeller, J., Scheidegger, C., & Venkatasubramanian, S. (2015) · Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2783258.2783311 · Cited by 1,827
Self-citation(2013) · Cited by 1,126
Duckworth, A. L., & Yeager, D. S. (2015) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x15584327 · Cited by 993
Three naive Bayes approaches for discrimination-free classification.
Calders, T., & Verwer, S. (2010) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-010-0190-x · Cited by 764
Efficient noise-tolerant learning from statistical queries
Kearns, M. J. (1998) · Journal of the ACM · doi:10.1145/293347.293351 · Cited by 679
Personality Psychology and Economics
Almlund, M., Duckworth, A. L., Heckman, J., & Kautz, T. (2011) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w16822 · Cited by 540 · cited 1×
“Personal qualities, such as self-control, growth mind-set, and grit, are known to be determining factors in later success [2].”
BackgroundGromov–Wasserstein Distances and the Metric Approach to Object Matching
Mémoli, F. (2011) · Foundations of Computational Mathematics · doi:10.1007/s10208-011-9093-5 · Cited by 519
Classifying without discriminating
Kamiran, F., & Calders, T. (2009) · 2009 2nd International Conference on Computer, Control and Communication · doi:10.1109/ic4.2009.4909197 · Cited by 409
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fairness and Abstraction in Sociotechnical Systems
Selbst, A. D., Boyd, D., Friedler, S. A., Venkatasubramanian, S., & Vertesi, J. (2019) · Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3287560.3287598 · Cited by 1,631
Self-citationInherent trade-offs in the fair determination of risk scores
Kleinberg, J., Mullainathan, S., & Raghavan, M. (2017) · Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik · doi:10.4230/lipics.itcs.2017.43 · Cited by 943
“[15] defines two axiomatic pro pe ties of feature generation and shows that no mechanism can be fair under these two properties.”
BackgroundAI Fairness 360: An extensible toolkit for detecting and mitigating algorithmic bias
Bellamy, R. K. E., Dey, K., Hind, M., Hoffman, S. C., Houde, S., Kannan, K., Lohia, P., Martino, J., Mehta, S., Mojsilović, A., et al. (2019) · IBM Journal of Research and Development · doi:10.1147/jrd.2019.2942287 · Cited by 884
Morley, J., Floridi, L., Kinsey, L., & Elhalal, A. (2020) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-019-00165-5 · Cited by 882
“…actually mean when there are currently a myriad definitions (Ananny and Crawford 2018; Bibal and Frénay 2016; Doshi-Velez and Kim 2017; Friedler et al. 2016; Guidotti et al. 2018; Kleinberg et al. 2016; Overdorf et al. 2018; Turilli and Floridi 2009) is standard fare for individuals…”
BackgroundSocial Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries
Olteanu, A., Castillo, C., Diaz, F., & Kıcıman, E. (2019) · Frontiers in Big Data · doi:10.3389/fdata.2019.00013 · Cited by 763
Lepri, B., Oliver, N., Letouzé, E., Pentland, A., & Vinck, P. (2018) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-017-0279-x · Cited by 709
Algorithmic Fairness: Choices, Assumptions, and Definitions
Mitchell, S., Potash, E., Barocas, S., D'Amour, A., & Lum, K. (2021) · Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application · doi:10.1146/annurev-statistics-042720-125902 · Cited by 687
Measuring and Mitigating Unintended Bias in Text Classification
Dixon, L., Li, J., Sorensen, J., Thain, N., & Vasserman, L. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society · doi:10.1145/3278721.3278729 · Cited by 674
A Review on Fairness in Machine Learning
Pessach, D., & Shmueli, E. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3494672 · Cited by 598
Recommender systems and their ethical challenges
Milano, S., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2020) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-020-00950-y · Cited by 556
Where fairness fails: data, algorithms, and the limits of antidiscrimination discourse
Hoffmann, A. L. (2019) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2019.1573912 · Cited by 535
FA*IR: A Fair Top-k Ranking Algorithm
Zehlike, M., Bonchi, F., Castillo, C., Hajian, S., Megahed, M., & Baeza-Yates, R. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management · doi:10.1145/3132847.3132938 · Cited by 496
Bellamy, R. K. E., Dey, K., Hind, M., Hoffman, S. C., Houde, S., Kannan, K., Lohia, P., Martino, J., Mehta, S., Mojsilovic, A., et al. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.01943 · Cited by 1,581
Fairness-Aware Ranking in Search & Recommendation Systems with Application to LinkedIn Talent Search
Geyik, S. C., Ambler, S., & Kenthapadi, K. (2019) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3292500.3330691 · Cited by 428
Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairness
Kearns, M., Neel, S., Roth, A., & Wu, Z. S. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1711.05144 · Cited by 469
Measuring Fairness in Ranked Outputs
Yang, K., & Stoyanovich, J. (2017) · Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management · doi:10.1145/3085504.3085526 · Cited by 378
Avoiding Discrimination through Causal Reasoning
Kilbertus, N., Rojas-Carulla, M., Parascandolo, G., Hardt, M., Janzing, D., & Schölkopf, B. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.02744 · Cited by 358
On the apparent conflict between individual and group fairness
Binns, R. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3351095.3372864 · Cited by 312
Inherent Tradeoffs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scores
Raghavan, M. (2023) · ACM eBooks · doi:10.1145/3603195.3603197 · Cited by 350
Algorithmic fairness in education
Kizilcec, R. F., & Lee, H. (2022) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429329067-10 · Cited by 339
Ethical limitations of algorithmic fairness solutions in health care machine learning
McCradden, M. D., Joshi, S., Mazwi, M., & Anderson, J. A. (2020) · The Lancet Digital Health · doi:10.1016/s2589-7500(20)30065-0 · Cited by 291
Friedler, S. A., Scheidegger, C., & Venkatasubramanian, S. (2021) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3433949 · Cited by 262
Self-citationThe Ethics of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Practices, Challenges, and Debates
Holmes, W., & Porayska-Pomsta, K. (2022) · doi:10.4324/9780429329067 · Cited by 258
Jacobs, A. Z., & Wallach, H. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445901 · Cited by 362
Predictive biases in natural language processing models: A conceptual framework and overview
Shah, D. S., Schwartz, H. A., & Hovy, D. (2020) · Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.468 · Cited by 241
The Frontiers of Fairness in Machine LearningPreprint
Chouldechova, A., & Roth, A. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.08810 · Cited by 372
Classification with Fairness Constraints: A Meta-Algorithm with Provable Guarantees
Celis, L. E., Huang, L., Keswani, V., & Vishnoi, N. K. (2019) · Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3287560.3287586 · Cited by 231
A clarification of the nuances in the fairness metrics landscape
Castelnovo, A., Crupi, R., Greco, G., Regoli, D., Penco, I. G., & Cosentini, A. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-07939-1 · Cited by 292
Grgic-Hlaca, N., Redmiles, E. M., Gummadi, K. P., & Weller, A. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference on World Wide Web - WWW '18 · doi:10.1145/3178876.3186138 · Cited by 207
Predictability and Surprise in Large Generative Models
Ganguli, D., Hernandez, D., Lovitt, L., Askell, A., Bai, Y., Chen, A., Conerly, T., Dassarma, N., Drain, D., Elhage, N., et al. (2022) · 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533229 · Cited by 207
Zajko, M. (2022) · Sociology Compass · doi:10.1111/soc4.12962 · Cited by 268
Algorithmic Profiling of Job Seekers in Austria: How Austerity Politics Are Made Effective
Allhutter, D., Cech, F., Fischer, F., Grill, G., & Mager, A. (2020) · Frontiers in Big Data · doi:10.3389/fdata.2020.00005 · Cited by 255
Algorithmic Impact Assessments and Accountability: The Co-construction of Impacts
Metcalf, J., Moss, E., Watkins, E. A., Singh, R., & Elish, M. C. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445935 · Cited by 195
Democratizing Algorithmic Fairness
Wong, P.-H. (2020) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-019-00355-w · Cited by 182
An empirical characterization of fair machine learning for clinical risk prediction
Pfohl, S. R., Foryciarz, A., & Shah, N. H. (2021) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103621 · Cited by 164
iFair: Learning Individually Fair Data Representations for Algorithmic Decision Making
Lahoti, P., Gummadi, K. P., & Weikum, G. (2019) · IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE) · doi:10.1109/icde.2019.00121 · Cited by 175
Designing Fair Ranking Schemes
Asudeh, A., Jagadish, H. V., Stoyanovich, J., & Das, G. (2019) · ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD) · doi:10.1145/3299869.3300079 · Cited by 159
Investigating the Impact of Gender on Rank in Resume Search Engines
Chen, L., Ma, R., Hannák, A., & Wilson, C. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3173574.3174225 · Cited by 155
Mökander, J., Axente, M., Casolari, F., & Floridi, L. (2022) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-021-09577-4 · Cited by 153
Ethical machines: The human-centric use of artificial intelligence
Lepri, B., Oliver, N., & Pentland, A. (2021) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2021.102249 · Cited by 149
A Moral Framework for Understanding Fair ML through Economic Models of Equality of Opportunity
Heidari, H., Loi, M., Gummadi, K. P., & Krause, A. (2019) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3287560.3287584 · Cited by 151
Fairness in rankings and recommendations: an overview
Pitoura, E., Stefanidis, K., & Koutrika, G. (2021) · The VLDB Journal · doi:10.1007/s00778-021-00697-y · Cited by 177
Reviewable Automated Decision-Making: A Framework for Accountable Algorithmic Systems
Cobbe, J., Lee, M. S. A., & Singh, J. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445921 · Cited by 150
Brun, Y., & Meliou, A. (2018) · ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (ESEC/FSE) · doi:10.1145/3236024.3264838 · Cited by 138
Building and Auditing Fair Algorithms: A Case Study in Candidate Screening
Wilson, C., Ghosh, A., Jiang, S., Mislove, A., Baker, L., Szary, J., Trindel, K., & Polli, F. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445928 · Cited by 133
A Short-term Intervention for Long-term Fairness in the Labor Market
Hu, L. J., & Chen, Y. (2018) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3178876.3186044 · Cited by 133
The Butterfly Effect in artificial intelligence systems: Implications for AI bias and fairness
Ferrara, E. (2024) · Machine Learning with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.mlwa.2024.100525 · Cited by 178
Morley, J., Floridi, L., Kinsey, L., & Elhalal, A. (2021) · Philosophical studies series · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-81907-1_10 · Cited by 202
FairSight: Visual Analytics for Fairness in Decision Making
Ahn, Y., & Lin, Y.-R. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2019.2934262 · Cited by 126
50 Years of Test (Un)fairness: Lessons for Machine LearningPreprint
Hutchinson, B., & Mitchell, M. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1811.10104 · Cited by 118
Fairness and Bias in Algorithmic Hiring: A Multidisciplinary Survey
Fabris, A., Baranowska, N., Dennis, M. J., Graus, D., Hacker, P., Saldivar, J., Zuiderveen Borgesius, F., & Biega, A. J. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3696457 · Cited by 117
The philosophical basis of algorithmic recourse
Venkatasubramanian, S., & Alfano, M. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3351095.3372876 · Cited by 114
Self-citationMökander, J., Axente, M., Casolari, F., & Floridi, L. (2022) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 115
Human Decision Making with Machine Assistance: An Experiment on Bailing and Jailing
Grgić-Hlača, N., Engel, C., & Gummadi, K. P. (2019) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3359280 · Cited by 113
Using Artificial Intelligence to classify Jobseekers: The Accuracy-Equity Trade-off
Desiere, S., & Struyven, L. (2020) · Journal of Social Policy · doi:10.1017/s0047279420000203 · Cited by 129
Exploring author gender in book rating and recommendation
Ekstrand, M. D., Tian, M., Kazi, M. I. R., Mehrpouyan, H., & Kluver, D. (2018) · ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys) · doi:10.1145/3240323.3240373 · Cited by 110
Algorithmic Fairness in Mortgage Lending: from Absolute Conditions to Relational Trade-offs
Lee, M. S. A., & Floridi, L. (2021) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-020-09529-4 · Cited by 106
Fairness through Causal Awareness
Madras, D., Creager, E., Pitassi, T., & Zemel, R. S. (2019) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3287560.3287564 · Cited by 116
Pessach, D., & Shmueli, E. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-24628-9_37 · Cited by 235
Formal Specification for Deep Neural Networks
Seshia, S. A., Desai, A., Dreossi, T., Fremont, D. J., Ghosh, S., Kim, E., Shivakumar, S., Vazquez-Chanlatte, M., & Yue, X. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01090-4_2 · Cited by 100
Stereotypical Bias Removal for Hate Speech Detection Task using Knowledge-based Generalizations
Badjatiya, P., Gupta, M., & Varma, V. (2019) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3308558.3313504 · Cited by 97
FairSquare: probabilistic verification of program fairness
Albarghouthi, A., D'Antoni, L., Drews, S., & Nori, A. V. (2017) · Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages · doi:10.1145/3133904 · Cited by 94
Conservative AI and social inequality: conceptualizing alternatives to bias through social theory
Zajko, M. (2021) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-021-01153-9 · Cited by 83
Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries
Olteanu, A., Castillo, C., Diaz, F., & Kiciman, E. (2016) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2886526 · Cited by 763
Fairness in Ranking, Part I: Score-Based Ranking
Zehlike, M., Yang, K., & Stoyanovich, J. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3533379 · Cited by 116
Operationalizing individual fairness with pairwise fair representations
Lahoti, P., Gummadi, K. P., & Weikum, G. (2019) · Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment · doi:10.14778/3372716.3372723 · Cited by 115
Affinity Profiling and Discrimination by Association in Online Behavioural AdvertisingPreprint
Wachter, S. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3388639 · Cited by 85
Online Set Selection with Fairness and Diversity Constraints
Stoyanovich, J., Yang, K., & Jagadish, H. V. (2018) · Movebank · doi:10.5441/002/edbt.2018.22 · Cited by 83
A Framework for Understanding Sources of Harm throughout the Machine Learning Life Cycle
Suresh, H., & Guttag, J. (2021) · Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization · doi:10.1145/3465416.3483305 · Cited by 82
Highly Accurate, But Still Discriminatory
Köchling, A., Riazy, S., Wehner, M., & Simbeck, K. (2020) · Business & Information Systems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12599-020-00673-w · Cited by 107
Stoyanovich, J., Howe, B., & Jagadish, H. V. (2020) · Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment · doi:10.14778/3415478.3415570 · Cited by 89
Evaluation Methods and Measures for Causal Learning Algorithms
Cheng, L., Guo, R., Moraffah, R., Sheth, P., Candan, K. S., & Liu, H. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tai.2022.3150264 · Cited by 88
Unlocking Fairness: a Trade-off Revisited
Wick, M., Panda, S., & Tristan, J.-B. (2019) · neural information processing systems · Cited by 74
Grgić-Hlača, N., Redmiles, E. M., Gummadi, K. P., & Weller, A. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1802.09548 · Cited by 75
Online Learning with an Unknown Fairness MetricPreprint
Gillen, S., Jung, C., Kearns, M. J., & Roth, A. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1802.06936 · Cited by 97
On the Applicability of Machine Learning Fairness Notions
Makhlouf, K., Zhioua, S., & Catuscia Palamidessi, A. (2021) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/3468507.3468511 · Cited by 96
Designing Disaggregated Evaluations of AI Systems: Choices, Considerations, and Tradeoffs
Barocas, S., Guo, A., Kamar, E., Krones, J., Morris, M. R., Vaughan, J. W., Wadsworth, W. D., & Wallach, H. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society · doi:10.1145/3461702.3462610 · Cited by 72
Meta Balanced Network for Fair Face Recognition
Wang, M., Zhang, Y., & Deng, W. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2021.3103191 · Cited by 71
Fair Influence Maximization: a Welfare Optimization Approach
Rahmattalabi, A., Jabbari, S., Lakkaraju, H., Vayanos, P., Izenberg, M., Brown, R. A., Rice, E. R. W., & Tambe, M. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i13.17383 · Cited by 76
Krupiy, T. (2020) · Computer law & security review · doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2020.105429 · Cited by 81
Perrone, V., Donini, M., Zafar, M. B., Schmucker, R., Kenthapadi, K., & Archambeau, C. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society · doi:10.1145/3461702.3462629 · Cited by 66
Exploring author gender in book rating and recommendation
Ekstrand, M. D., & Kluver, D. (2021) · User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction · doi:10.1007/s11257-020-09284-2 · Cited by 66
The many dimensions of algorithmic fairness in educational applications
Loukina, A., Madnani, N., & Zechner, K. (2019) · Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications · doi:10.18653/v1/w19-4401 · Cited by 64
Machine learning fairness notions: Bridging the gap with real-world applications
Makhlouf, K., Zhioua, S., & Catuscia Palamidessi, A. (2021) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102642 · Cited by 94
Fair Top-k Ranking with multiple protected groups
Zehlike, M., Sühr, T., Baeza-Yates, R. A., Bonchi, F., Castillo, C., & Hajian, S. (2021) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102707 · Cited by 63
Zhang, G., Bai, B., Zhang, J., Bai, K., Zhu, C., & Zhao, T. (2020) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.380 · Cited by 65
Towards a pragmatist dealing with algorithmic bias in medical machine learning
Starke, G., De Clercq, E., & Elger, B. S. (2021) · Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11019-021-10008-5 · Cited by 54
Fair Learning in Markovian EnvironmentsPreprint
Jabbari, S., Joseph, M., Kearns, M., Morgenstern, J. H., & Roth, A. (2016) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1611.03071 · Cited by 35
Matching Code and Law: Achieving Algorithmic Fairness with Optimal Transport
Zehlike, M., Hacker, P., & Wiedemann, E. (2019) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-019-00658-8 · Cited by 66
Varanasi, R. A., & Goyal, N. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3580903 · Cited by 52
Transparency, Fairness, Data Protection, Neutrality
Abiteboul, S., & Stoyanovich, J. (2019) · Journal of Data and Information Quality · doi:10.1145/3310231 · Cited by 58
Glymour, B., & Herington, J. (2019) · Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3287560.3287573 · Cited by 50
Fairness-Aware Machine Learning
Bird, S., Kenthapadi, K., Kıcıman, E., & Mitchell, M. (2019) · ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM) · doi:10.1145/3289600.3291383 · Cited by 49
On the Moral Justification of Statistical Parity
Hertweck, C., Heitz, C., & Loi, M. (2021) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445936 · Cited by 59
Building Better Open-Source Tools to Support Fairness in Automated Scoring
Madnani, N., Loukina, A., von Davier, A. A., Burstein, J. C., & Cahill, A. (2017) · doi:10.18653/v1/w17-1605 · Cited by 45
Fairness in representation: quantifying stereotyping as a representational harm
Abbasi, M., Friedler, S. A., Scheidegger, C., & Venkatasubramanian, S. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining · doi:10.1137/1.9781611975673.90 · Cited by 44
Self-citationAlgorithmic fairness in credit scoring
Bono, T., Croxson, K., & Giles, A. (2021) · Oxford Review of Economic Policy · doi:10.1093/oxrep/grab020 · Cited by 52
Simbeck, K. (2019) · IBM Journal of Research and Development · doi:10.1147/jrd.2019.2915067 · Cited by 53
Fair Algorithms for ClusteringPreprint
Bera, S. K., Chakrabarty, D., Flores, N. J., & Negahbani, M. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1901.02393 · Cited by 139
Metadata
- Authors
- Friedler, S. A., Scheidegger, C., & Venkatasubramanian, S.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2016
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1609.07236
- OpenAlex
- W2524301210
- Cited by
- 247
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Keywords
- algorithmic fairness, fairness definitions, decision space, impossibility results, fairness assumptions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
