PreprintCited by 2,225Generative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisStochastic Gradient Optimization TechniquesAdversarial Robustness in Machine Learning

Wasserstein GAN

Open access
Arjovsky, Martin, Chintala, Soumith, Bottou, Léon·2017·arXiv

Abstract

We introduce a new algorithm named WGAN, an alternative to traditional GAN training. In this new model, we show that we can improve the stability of learning, get rid of problems like mode collapse, and provide meaningful learning curves useful for debugging and hyperparameter searches. Furthermore, we show that the corresponding optimization problem is sound, and provide extensive theoretical work highlighting the deep connections to other distances between distributions.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1701.07875

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Wasserstein GAN usually generates more natural and higher quality fake faces than DCGAN.

    “As a result, Wasserstein GANusually generates more natural and higher quality fake faces than DCGAN.”

    From Countering Malicious DeepFakes: Survey, Battleground, and Horizon (2022) · cites this paper as Arjovsky et al. 2017

  • WGAN has theoretically minimized a reasonable and efficient approximation of the expectation-maximization (EM) distance, which only needs a few optimization designs on the original GANs.

    “WGAN has theoretically minimized a reasonable and efficient approximation of the expectation-maximization (EM) distance, which only needs a few optimization designs on the original GANs.”

    From Countering Malicious DeepFakes: Survey, Battleground, and Horizon (2022) · cites this paper as Arjovsky et al. 2017

  • NetGAN combines LSTMs with Wasserstein GANs to generate graphs from a random-walk-based approach.

    “NetGAN [70] combines LSTMs [7] with Wasserstein GANs [116] to generate graphs from a random-walk-based approach.”

    From A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networks (2021) · cites this paper as [116]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arjovsky, M., Chintala, S., & Bottou, L.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2017
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4394670483
Cited by
2,225
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 124 · 2024: 249 · 2023: 242 · 2022: 261 · 2021: 428 · 2020: 412 · 2019: 338 · 2018: 132 · 2017: 13 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Keywords
Wasserstein GAN, generative adversarial networks, Wasserstein distance, mode collapse, training stability, learning curve, hyperparameter optimization, distance between distributions, optimization problems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review