PreprintCited by 1,242Topic ModelingArtificial Intelligence in GamesNatural Language Processing Techniques

Hierarchical Neural Story Generation

Open access
Fan, Angela, Lewis, Mike, Dauphin, Yann·2018·arXiv

Abstract

We explore story generation: creative systems that can build coherent and fluent passages of text about a topic. We collect a large dataset of 300K human-written stories paired with writing prompts from an online forum. Our dataset enables hierarchical story generation, where the model first generates a premise, and then transforms it into a passage of text. We gain further improvements with a novel form of model fusion that improves the relevance of the story to the prompt, and adding a new gated multi-scale self-attention mechanism to model long-range context. Experiments show large improvements over strong baselines on both automated and human evaluations. Human judges prefer stories generated by our approach to those from a strong non-hierarchical model by a factor of two to one.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1805.04833

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing memory management methods that depend on vector retrieval and hierarchical storage are prone to noise accumulation, uncontrolled memory expansion, and limited generalization across domains.

    “Existing memory management methods typically depend on vector retrieval and hierarchical storage, yet they are prone to noise accumulation, uncontrolled memory expansion, and limited generalization across domains.”

    From SEDM: Scalable Self-Evolving Distributed Memory for Agents (2025) · cites this paper as [11]

    Section 3.1 (p. 2) describes hierarchical story generation, not hierarchical memory storage. Section 3.3 (p. 3) discusses self-attention and avoiding noisy past context, but does not assess vector-retrieval memory management or claim noise accumulation, uncontrolled memory expansion, or limited cross-domain generalization. Searches for those terms and memory-management variants found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The accumulation of noise in memory severely degrades retrieval quality.

    “One major challenge is the inevitable accumulation of noise, which severely degrades retrieval quality [11].”

    From SEDM: Scalable Self-Evolving Distributed Memory for Agents (2025) · cites this paper as [11]

    The closest retrieval-related passage, §5.1 Baselines (p. 5), describes a KNN search for similar prompts but does not discuss noise accumulating in memory or its effect on retrieval quality. Searches for the claim’s phrase and for “memory noise retrieval quality” found no passage addressing that relationship. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fan, A., Lewis, M., & Dauphin, Y.
Affiliations
Meta (United States) (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2018
Pages
889-898
ISSN
0736-587X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2963096510
Cited by
1,242
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 49 · 2025: 118 · 2024: 144 · 2023: 249 · 2022: 171 · 2021: 236 · 2020: 172 · 2019: 94 · 2018: 9
FWCI
52.15
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence in Games
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
Keywords
story generation, model fusion, long-range context modeling, writing prompts, creative text generation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review