The DOI matches its DataCite record; 13 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Avoiding Discrimination through Causal Reasoning
Open accessAbstract
Recent work on fairness in machine learning has focused on various statistical discrimination criteria and how they trade off. Most of these criteria are observational: They depend only on the joint distribution of predictor, protected attribute, features, and outcome. While convenient to work with, observational criteria have severe inherent limitations that prevent them from resolving matters of fairness conclusively. Going beyond observational criteria, we frame the problem of discrimination based on protected attributes in the language of causal reasoning. This viewpoint shifts attention from "What is the right fairness criterion?" to "What do we want to assume about the causal data generating process?" Through the lens of causality, we make several contributions. First, we crisply articulate why and when observational criteria fail, thus formalizing what was before a matter of opinion. Second, our approach exposes previously ignored subtleties and why they are fundamental to the problem. Finally, we put forward natural causal non-discrimination criteria and develop algorithms that satisfy them.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Although observational fairness criteria have inherent limitations (Kilbertus et al. 2017;Barocas, Hardt, and Narayanan 2019) such as indistinguishability, these criteria are appealing because of their ease of use.”
From Antidiscrimination Insurance Pricing: Regulations, Fairness Criteria, and Models (2024) · cites this paper as Kilbertus et al. 2017
In the citing paper
“Causal approaches can help to resolve these conceptual roadblocks since they allow to formalize the meaning of what makes observations similar [16].”
From Under the Radar -- Auditing Fairness in ML for Humanitarian Mapping (2021) · cites this paper as [16]
Citations
Cites
The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects
ROSENBAUM, P. R., & RUBIN, D. B. (1983) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/70.1.41 · Cited by 31,241
Dwork, C., Hardt, M., Pitassi, T., Reingold, O., & Zemel, R. (2012) · Proceedings of the 3rd Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference · doi:10.1145/2090236.2090255 · Cited by 3,501
Self-citationEquality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning
Hardt, M., Price, E., & Srebro, N. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1610.02413 · Cited by 2,536
Self-citationAngrist, J. D., & Krueger, A. B. (2001) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.15.4.69 · Cited by 2,355
Fair prediction with disparate impact: a study of bias in recidivism prediction instruments
Chouldechova, A. (2017) · Big Data · doi:10.1089/big.2016.0047 · Cited by 2,159
Certifying and Removing Disparate Impact
Feldman, M., Friedler, S. A., Moeller, J., Scheidegger, C., & Venkatasubramanian, S. (2015) · Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2783258.2783311 · Cited by 1,827
Bickel, P. J., Hammel, E. A., & O'Connell, J. W. (1975) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.187.4175.398 · Cited by 659
Zafar, M. B., Valera, I., Gomez Rodriguez, M., & Gummadi, K. P. (2017) · Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/3038912.3052660 · Cited by 632
VanderWeele, T. J., & Robinson, W. R. (2014) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/ede.0000000000000105 · Cited by 567
On the (im)possibility of fairness
Friedler, S. A., Scheidegger, C., & Venkatasubramanian, S. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1609.07236 · Cited by 247
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 359
Calibration for the (Computationally-Identifiable) MassesPreprint
Hébert-Johnson, Ú., Kim, M. P., Reingold, O., & Rothblum, G. N. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1711.08513 · Cited by 68
Conditional Learning of Fair Representations
Zhao, H., Coston, A., Adel, T., & Gordon, G. J. (2019) · ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.07162 · Cited by 75
Counterfactual Fairness with Disentangled Causal Effect Variational Autoencoder
Kim, H., Shin, S., Jang, J., Song, K., Joo, W., Kang, W., & Moon, I. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i9.16990 · Cited by 43
Hoque, M. N., & Mueller, K. D. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2021.3102051 · Cited by 51
Fair and Unbiased Algorithmic Decision Making: Current State and Future ChallengesPreprint
Tolan, S. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1901.04730 · Cited by 66
FairMask: Better Fairness via Model-Based Rebalancing of Protected Attributes
Peng, K., Chakraborty, J., & Menzies, T. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2022.3220713 · Cited by 42
Assessing trustworthy AI: Technical and legal perspectives of fairness in AI
Kattnig, M., Angerschmid, A., Reichel, T., & Kern, R. (2024) · Computer law & security review · doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106053 · Cited by 63
Young, M., Rodriguez, L., Keller, E., Sun, F., Sa, B., Whittington, J., & Howe, B. (2019) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3287560.3287577 · Cited by 47
von Kügelgen, J., Gresele, L., & Schölkopf, B. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tai.2021.3073088 · Cited by 45
Self-citationThe Causal Fairness Field Guide: Perspectives From Social and Formal Sciences
Carey, A. N., & Wu, X. (2022) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.3389/fdata.2022.892837 · Cited by 109
Automated feature engineering for algorithmic fairness
Salazar, R., Neutatz, F., & Abedjan, Z. (2021) · Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment · doi:10.14778/3461535.3463474 · Cited by 47
Amazon SageMaker Clarify: Machine Learning Bias Detection and Explainability in the Cloud
Hardt, M., Chen, X., Cheng, X., Donini, M., Gelman, J., Gollaprolu, S., He, J., Larroy, P., Liu, X., McCarthy, N., et al. (2021) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3447548.3467177 · Cited by 52
Self-citationMarrying Fairness and Explainability in Supervised Learning
Grabowicz, P. A., Perello, N., & Mishra, A. (2022) · 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533236 · Cited by 37
(2017) · doi:10.4230/lipics.forc.2020.6 · Cited by 27
Examining Gender and Race Bias in Two Hundred Sentiment Analysis SystemsPreprint
Kiritchenko, S., & Mohammad, S. M. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1805.04508 · Cited by 137
Survey on Causal-based Machine Learning Fairness NotionsPreprint
Makhlouf, K., Zhioua, S., & Catuscia Palamidessi, A. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.09553 · Cited by 94
Antidiscrimination Insurance Pricing: Regulations, Fairness Criteria, and Models
Xin, X., & Huang, F. (2024) · North American Actuarial Journal · doi:10.1080/10920277.2023.2190528 · Cited by 43
Designing equitable algorithms
Chohlas-Wood, A., Coots, M., Goel, S., & Nyarko, J. (2023) · Nature Computational Science · doi:10.1038/s43588-023-00485-4 · Cited by 42
Removing Spurious Features can Hurt Accuracy and Affect Groups Disproportionately
Khani, F., & Liang, P. (2021) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445883 · Cited by 45
Mitigating Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing: Literature ReviewPreprint
Sun, T., Gaut, A., Tang, S., Huang, Y., ElSherief, M., Zhao, J., Mirza, D., Belding, E., Chang, K.-W., & Wang, W. Y. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1906.08976 · Cited by 109
Data Pre-Processing for Discrimination Prevention: Information-Theoretic Optimization and Analysis
Calmon, F. D. P., Wei, D., Vinzamuri, B., Ramamurthy, K. N., & Varshney, K. R. (2018) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/jstsp.2018.2865887 · Cited by 33
Understanding Relations Between Perception of Fairness and Trust in Algorithmic Decision Making
Zhou, J., Verma, S., Mittal, M., & Chen, F. (2021) · 2021 8th International Conference on Behavioral and Social Computing (BESC) · doi:10.1109/besc53957.2021.9635182 · Cited by 36
Viviano, D., & Bradić, J. (2022) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.2022.2142591 · Cited by 40
Fairness in Social Influence Maximization
Stoica, A.-A., & Chaintreau, A. (2019) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3308560.3317588 · Cited by 33
Generative causal explanations of black-box classifiersPreprint
O’Shaughnessy, M. R., Canal, G., Connor, M., Davenport, M. A., & Rozell, C. J. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.13913 · Cited by 38
PreCoF: counterfactual explanations for fairness
Goethals, S., Martens, D., & Calders, T. (2023) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-023-06319-8 · Cited by 38
Towards Formal Fairness in Machine Learning
Ignatiev, A., Cooper, M., Siala, M., Hébrard, E., & Marques-Silva, J. P. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58475-7_49 · Cited by 36
Through the Data Management Lens: Experimental Analysis and Evaluation of Fair Classification
Islam, M. T., Fariha, A., Meliou, A., & Salimi, B. (2022) · ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD) · doi:10.1145/3514221.3517841 · Cited by 33
Tae, K. H., & Whang, S. E. (2021) · ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD) · doi:10.1145/3448016.3452792 · Cited by 35
Causality for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence: Status, Challenges and Perspectives
Rawal, A., Raglin, A. J., Rawat, D. B., Sadler, B. M., & McCoy, J. (2024) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3665494 · Cited by 38
Algorithmic Decision Making with Conditional Fairness
Xu, R., Cui, P., Kuang, K., Li, B., Zhou, L., Shen, Z., & Cui, W. (2020) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3394486.3403263 · Cited by 32
Misspecification and unreliable interpretations in psychology and social science.
Vowels, M. J. (2021) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/met0000429 · Cited by 41
FairRankVis: A Visual Analytics Framework for Exploring Algorithmic Fairness in Graph Mining Models
Xie, T., Ma, Y., Kang, J. L., Tong, H., & Maciejewski, R. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2021.3114850 · Cited by 30
Counterfactual Reasoning for Fair Clinical Risk PredictionPreprint
Pfohl, S., Duan, T., Ding, D. Y., & Shah, N. H. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.06260 · Cited by 34
Holstein, K., & Doroudi, S. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.12920 · Cited by 29
“Note that such scenarios can play out even if no demographic variables are used in a machine learning model, because other variables can (and often will) correlate with demographic variables in non-obvious ways (Barocas & Selbst, 2016; Datta et al., 2017, Dwork et al., 2012; Kilbertus et al., 2017).”
BackgroundWord Embeddings via Causal Inference: Gender Bias Reducing and Semantic Information Preserving
Ding, L., Yu, D., Xie, J., Guo, W., Hu, S., Liu, M., Kong, L., Dai, H., Bao, Y., & Jiang, B. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v36i11.21443 · Cited by 29
Fairness amidst non‐IID graph data: A literature review
Zhang, W., Zhou, S., Walsh, T., & Weiss, J. C. (2025) · AI Magazine · doi:10.1002/aaai.12212 · Cited by 29
Guarding Against Adversarial Domain Shifts with Counterfactual Regularization.Preprint
Heinze‐Deml, C., & Meinshausen, N. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 32
Putting Fairness Principles into Practice: Challenges, Metrics, and ImprovementsPreprint
Beutel, A., Chen, J., Doshi, T. S., Qian, H., Woodruff, A., Luu, C., Kreitmann, P., Bischof, J., & Ed, H. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1901.04562 · Cited by 29
The Sensitivity of Counterfactual Fairness to Unmeasured ConfoundingPreprint
Kilbertus, N., Ball, P., Kusner, M. J., Weller, A., & Silva, R. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.01040 · Cited by 29
Self-citationA Variational Approach to Privacy and Fairness
Rodríguez-Gálvez, B., Thobaben, R., & Skoglund, M. (2021) · IEEE Information Theory Workshop (ITW) · doi:10.1109/itw48936.2021.9611429 · Cited by 31
Designing Up with Value-Sensitive Design: Building a Field Guide for Ethical ML Development
Boyd, K. (2022) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3531146.3534626 · Cited by 30
Causal Inference for Recommendation: Foundations, Methods, and Applications
Xu, S., Ji, J., Li, Y., Ge, Y., Tan, J., & Zhang, Y. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3714430 · Cited by 40
Mhasawade, V., & Chunara, R. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society · doi:10.1145/3461702.3462587 · Cited by 30
The fairness‐accuracy Pareto front
Wei, S. H., & Niethammer, M. (2021) · Statistical Analysis and Data Mining The ASA Data Science Journal · doi:10.1002/sam.11560 · Cited by 38
Ensuring Fairness Beyond the Training DataPreprint
Mandal, D., Deng, S., Jana, S., Wing, J. M., & Hsu, D. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.06029 · Cited by 27
The Fairness of Credit Scoring Models
Hurlin, C., Perignon, C., & Saurin, S. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3785882 · Cited by 26
A General Framework for Fair Regression
Fitzsimons, J., Ali, A. A., Osborne, M., & Roberts, S. (2019) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e21080741 · Cited by 33
Distributional Random Forests: Heterogeneity Adjustment and Multivariate Distributional Regression
Ćevid, D., Michel, L., Näf, J., Bühlmann, P., & Meinshausen, N. (2020) · Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) · doi:10.3929/ethz-b-000585771 · Cited by 26
Multidisciplinary considerations of fairness in medical AI: A scoping review
Wang, Y., Song, Y., Ma, Z., & Han, X. (2023) · Int. J. Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105175 · Cited by 20
Fairness by Explicability and Adversarial SHAP Learning
Hickey, J. M., Stefano, P. G. D., & Vasileiou, V. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-67664-3_11 · Cited by 30
New Digital Inequalities. Algorithms Divide
Ragnedda, M. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-49079-9_4 · Cited by 28
A review of causality-based fairness machine learning
Su, C., Yu, G., Wang, J., Yan, Z., & Cui, L. (2022) · Intelligence & Robotics · doi:10.20517/ir.2022.17 · Cited by 28
Hauer, M. P., Kevekordes, J., & Haeri, M. A. (2021) · Computer law & security review · doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105583 · Cited by 28
Reducing Sentiment Bias in Language Models via Counterfactual EvaluationPreprint
Huang, P.-S., Zhang, H., Jiang, R., Stanforth, R., Welbl, J., Rae, J. W., Maini, V., Yogatama, D., & Kohli, P. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1911.03064 · Cited by 98
Fairness Evaluation in Presence of Biased Noisy Labels
Fogliato, R., G'Sell, M., & Chouldechova, A. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2003.13808 · Cited by 23
Measuring Fairness in an Unfair World
Herington, J. (2020) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society · doi:10.1145/3375627.3375854 · Cited by 22
The Zoo of Fairness Metrics in Machine LearningPreprint
Castelnovo, A., Crupi, R., Greco, G., Regoli, D., Penco, I. G., & Cosentini, A. C. (2021) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1162350/v1 · Cited by 21
Can Prompt Probe Pretrained Language Models? Understanding the Invisible Risks from a Causal View
Cao, B., Lin, H., Han, X., Liu, F., & Sun, L. (2022) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.398 · Cited by 28
Integrating Fairness in the Software Design Process: An Interview Study With HCI and ML Experts
Ryan, S., Nadal, C., & Doherty, G. J. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3260639 · Cited by 24
Christos Dimitrakakis, A., Liu, Y., Parkes, D. C., & Radanović, G. (2019) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v33i01.3301509 · Cited by 24
FR-Train: A Mutual Information-Based Approach to Fair and Robust TrainingPreprint
Roh, Y., Lee, K., Whang, S. E., & Suh, C. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2002.10234 · Cited by 23
Fairness seen as global sensitivity analysis
Bénesse, C., Gamboa, F., Loubes, J.-M., & Boissin, T. (2024) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-022-06202-y · Cited by 19
Lacroux, A., & Martin‐Lacroux, C. (2021) · Management & Avenir · doi:10.3917/mav.122.0121 · Cited by 32
Black, E., Naidu, R. C. A., Ghani, R., Rodolfa, K. T., Ho, D. E., & Heidari, H. (2023) · ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization (EAAMO) · doi:10.1145/3617694.3623259 · Cited by 19
Learning to Be Fair: A Consequentialist Approach to Equitable Decision Making
Chohlas-Wood, A., Coots, M., Zhu, H., Brunskill, E., & Goel, S. (2024) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2022.00345 · Cited by 34
Optimized Score Transformation for Fair ClassificationPreprint
Wei, D., Ramamurthy, K. N., & Calmon, F. P. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 22
Principal Fairness for Human and Algorithmic Decision-Making
Imai, K., & Jiang, Z. (2023) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/22-sts872 · Cited by 31
The Life Cycle of Knowledge in Big Language Models: A Survey
Cao, B., Lin, H., Han, X., & Sun, L. (2024) · Machine Intelligence Research · doi:10.1007/s11633-023-1416-x · Cited by 18
An Information-Theoretic Quantification of Discrimination with Exempt Features
Dutta, S., Venkatesh, P., Mardziel, P., Datta, A., & Grover, P. (2020) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v34i04.5794 · Cited by 18
BeFair: Addressing Fairness in the Banking Sector
Castelnovo, A., Crupi, R., Gamba, G. D., Greco, G., Naseer, A., Regoli, D., & González, B. S. M. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata50022.2020.9377894 · Cited by 21
To Split or not to Split: The Impact of Disparate Treatment in Classification
Wang, H., Hsu, H., Díaz, M., & Calmon, F. P. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2021.3075415 · Cited by 19
On conditional parity as a notion of non-discrimination in machine learningPreprint
Ritov, Y., Sun, Y., & Zhao, R. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.08519 · Cited by 18
Understanding Agent Incentives using Causal Influence Diagrams. Part I: Single Action SettingsPreprint
Everitt, T., Ortega, P. A., Barnes, E. A., & Legg, S. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1902.09980 · Cited by 27
Fairness in Ranking under UncertaintyPreprint
Singh, A., Kempe, D., & Joachims, T. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.06720 · Cited by 23
The Life Cycle of Knowledge in Big Language Models: A Survey
Cao, B., Lin, H., Han, X., & Sun, L. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.07616 · Cited by 18
Debiasing Vandalism Detection Models at Wikidata
Heindorf, S., Scholten, Y., Engels, G., & Potthast, M. (2019) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3308558.3313507 · Cited by 17
The Price of Local Fairness in Multistage Selection
Emelianov, V., Arvanitakis, G., Gast, N., Gummadi, K. P., & Loiseau, P. (2019) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2019/809 · Cited by 21
Decoupled classifiers for fair and efficient machine learningPreprint
Dwork, C., Immorlica, N., Kalai, A. T., & Leiserson, M. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1707.06613 · Cited by 17
Review of Mathematical frameworks for Fairness in Machine LearningPreprint
del Barrio, E., Gordaliza, P., & Loubes, J. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.13755 · Cited by 50
Path-Specific Counterfactual Fairness
Chiappa, S. (2019) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33017801 · Cited by 16
What is fair? Proxy discrimination vs. demographic disparities in insurance pricing
Lindholm, M., Richman, R., Tsanakas, A., & Wüthrich, M. V. (2024) · Scandinavian Actuarial Journal · doi:10.1080/03461238.2024.2364741 · Cited by 26
Automated Journalism as a Source of and a Diagnostic Device for Bias in Reporting
Leppänen, L., Tuulonen, H., & Sirén‐Heikel, S. (2020) · Media and Communication · doi:10.17645/mac.v8i3.3022 · Cited by 19
Fairness-aware Classification: Criterion, Convexity, and BoundsPreprint
Wu, Y., Zhang, L., & Wu, X. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1809.04737 · Cited by 16
Causal Intersectionality and Fair RankingPreprint
Yang, K., Loftus, J. R., & Stoyanovich, J. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.4230/lipics.forc.2021.7 · Cited by 62
Gaebler, J. D., Goel, S., Huq, A., & Tambe, P. (2024) · Behavioral Science & Policy · doi:10.1177/23794607251320229 · Cited by 15
Two Kinds of Discrimination in AI-Based Penal Decision-Making
Hübner, D. (2021) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/3468507.3468510 · Cited by 19
Gender and sex bias in COVID-19 epidemiological data through the lens of causality
Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Binkytė, R., Bakkali, W., Bookseller, S., Tubaro, P., Bacevičius, A., Zhioua, S., & Chatila, R. (2023) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103276 · Cited by 15
Big Data Management for Machine Learning from Big Data
Olawoyin, A. M., Leung, C. K.-S., Hryhoruk, C. C. J., & Cuzzocrea, A. (2023) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-29056-5_35 · Cited by 15
Zhang, C., Yang, Y., & Mostafavi, A. (2021) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102160 · Cited by 15
Envy-Free ClassificationPreprint
Balcan, M.-F., Dick, T., Noothigattu, R., & Procaccia, A. D. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1809.08700 · Cited by 15
The Importance of Data Access Regimes for Artificial Intelligence and Machine LearningPreprint
Martens, B. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3357652 · Cited by 15
Fairness Through Robustness: Investigating Robustness Disparity in Deep LearningPreprint
Nanda, V., Dooley, S. W., Singla, S., Feizi, S., & Dickerson, J. P. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.12621 · Cited by 15
When Causality Meets Fairness: A Survey
Makhlouf, K., Zhioua, S., & Catuscia Palamidessi, A. (2023) · Journal of Logical and Algebraic Methods in Programming · doi:10.1016/j.jlamp.2024.101000 · Cited by 14
HypoML: Visual Analysis for Hypothesis-based Evaluation of Machine Learning Models
Wang, Q., Alexander, W., Pegg, J., Qu, H., & Chen, M. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2020.3030449 · Cited by 16
Martin, D., Prabhakaran, V., Kuhlberg, J., Smart, A., & Isaac, W. S. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.09663 · Cited by 41
Fairness in Risk Assessment Instruments: Post-Processing to Achieve Counterfactual Equalized OddsPreprint
Mishler, A., Kennedy, E. H., & Chouldechova, A. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2009.02841 · Cited by 14
Dale, R., Cheng, M., Pines, K. C., & Currie, M. E. (2024) · BMC Medical Ethics · doi:10.1186/s12910-024-01116-x · Cited by 13
Oneto, L., Donini, M., Pontil, M., & Shawe-Taylor, J. S. (2020) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2019.12.137 · Cited by 13
Why Fair Labels Can Yield Unfair Predictions: Graphical Conditions for Introduced Unfairness
Ashurst, C., Carey, R., Chiappa, S., & Everitt, T. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v36i9.21182 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Kilbertus, N., Rojas-Carulla, M., Parascandolo, G., Hardt, M., Janzing, D., & Schölkopf, B.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Society (DE)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2017
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1706.02744
- OpenAlex
- W2624319794
- Cited by
- 358
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 78 · 2019: 65 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 7
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Keywords
- algorithmic fairness, discrimination, protected characteristics, causal reasoning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
