The DOI matches its DataCite record; 13 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Avoiding Discrimination through Causal Reasoning
Open accessAbstract
Recent work on fairness in machine learning has focused on various statistical discrimination criteria and how they trade off. Most of these criteria are observational: They depend only on the joint distribution of predictor, protected attribute, features, and outcome. While convenient to work with, observational criteria have severe inherent limitations that prevent them from resolving matters of fairness conclusively. Going beyond observational criteria, we frame the problem of discrimination based on protected attributes in the language of causal reasoning. This viewpoint shifts attention from "What is the right fairness criterion?" to "What do we want to assume about the causal data generating process?" Through the lens of causality, we make several contributions. First, we crisply articulate why and when observational criteria fail, thus formalizing what was before a matter of opinion. Second, our approach exposes previously ignored subtleties and why they are fundamental to the problem. Finally, we put forward natural causal non-discrimination criteria and develop algorithms that satisfy them.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Although observational fairness criteria have inherent limitations (Kilbertus et al. 2017;Barocas, Hardt, and Narayanan 2019) such as indistinguishability, these criteria are appealing because of their ease of use.”
From Antidiscrimination Insurance Pricing: Regulations, Fairness Criteria, and Models (2024) · cites this paper as Kilbertus et al. 2017
In the citing paper
“Causal approaches can help to resolve these conceptual roadblocks since they allow to formalize the meaning of what makes observations similar [16].”
From Under the Radar -- Auditing Fairness in ML for Humanitarian Mapping (2021) · cites this paper as [16]
Citations
Cites
The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects
ROSENBAUM, P. R., & RUBIN, D. B. (1983) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/70.1.41 · Cited by 31,241
Dwork, C., Hardt, M., Pitassi, T., Reingold, O., & Zemel, R. (2012) · Proceedings of the 3rd Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference · doi:10.1145/2090236.2090255 · Cited by 3,501
Self-citationEquality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning
Hardt, M., Price, E., & Srebro, N. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1610.02413 · Cited by 2,536
Self-citationAngrist, J. D., & Krueger, A. B. (2001) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.15.4.69 · Cited by 2,355
Fair prediction with disparate impact: a study of bias in recidivism prediction instruments
Chouldechova, A. (2017) · Big Data · doi:10.1089/big.2016.0047 · Cited by 2,159
Certifying and Removing Disparate Impact
Feldman, M., Friedler, S. A., Moeller, J., Scheidegger, C., & Venkatasubramanian, S. (2015) · Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2783258.2783311 · Cited by 1,827
Bickel, P. J., Hammel, E. A., & O'Connell, J. W. (1975) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.187.4175.398 · Cited by 659
Zafar, M. B., Valera, I., Gomez Rodriguez, M., & Gummadi, K. P. (2017) · Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/3038912.3052660 · Cited by 632
VanderWeele, T. J., & Robinson, W. R. (2014) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/ede.0000000000000105 · Cited by 567
On the (im)possibility of fairness
Friedler, S. A., Scheidegger, C., & Venkatasubramanian, S. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1609.07236 · Cited by 247
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 359
Causal Interventions for FairnessPreprint
Kusner, M. J., Russell, C., Loftus, J. R., & Silva, R. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1806.02380 · Cited by 18
Data Management for Causal Algorithmic FairnessPreprint
Salimi, B., Howe, B., & Suciu, D. M. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1908.07924 · Cited by 20
Reasoning about causality in games
Hammond, L., Fox, J., Everitt, T., Carey, R., Abate, A., & Wooldridge, M. (2023) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2023.103919 · Cited by 13
Utility-Fairness Trade-Offs and how to Find Them
Dehdashtian, S., Sadeghi, B., & Boddeti, V. N. (2024) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.01144 · Cited by 13
The Target Study: A Conceptual Model and Framework for Measuring Disparity
Jackson, J. W., Hsu, Y., Greer, R. C., Boonyasai, R. T., & Howe, C. J. (2025) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/00491241251314037 · Cited by 16
Demographic Bias: A Challenge for Fingervein Recognition Systems?
Drozdowski, P., Prommegger, B., Wimmer, G., Schraml, R., Rathgeb, C., Uhl, A., & Busch, C. (2020) · European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO) · doi:10.23919/eusipco47968.2020.9287722 · Cited by 12
Causal Structure Learning of Bias for Fair Affect Recognition
Cheong, J., Kalkan, S., & Güneş, H. (2023) · IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision Workshops (WACVW) · doi:10.1109/wacvw58289.2023.00038 · Cited by 12
Sound and complete causal identification with latent variables given local background knowledge
Wang, T.-Z., Qin, T., & Zhou, Z. (2023) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2023.103964 · Cited by 12
Fair Data Adaptation with Quantile Preservation
Plečko, D., & Meinshausen, N. (2019) · Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) · doi:10.3929/ethz-b-000459191 · Cited by 13
UDIS: Unsupervised Discovery of Bias in Deep Visual Recognition Models
Krishnakumar, A., Prabhu, V., Sudhakar, S., & Hoffman, J. (2021) · British Machine Vision Conference (BMVC) · doi:10.5244/c.35.102 · Cited by 12
Fairness with Dynamics.Preprint
Wen, M., Bastani, O., & Topcu, U. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 12
Capuchin: Causal Database Repair for Algorithmic FairnessPreprint
Salimi, B., Rodriguez, L., Howe, B., & Suciu, D. M. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1902.08283 · Cited by 12
The Use and Misuse of Counterfactuals in Ethical Machine Learning
Kasirzadeh, A., & Smart, A. (2021) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445886 · Cited by 27
Regulatory Instruments for Fair Personalized Pricing
Xu, R., Zhang, X., Cui, P., Li, B., Shen, Z., & Xu, J. (2022) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3485447.3512046 · Cited by 15
Fairness Under Feature Exemptions: Counterfactual and Observational Measures
Dutta, S., Venkatesh, P., Mardziel, P., Datta, A., & Grover, P. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2021.3103206 · Cited by 14
Metrics and methods for a systematic comparison of fairness-aware machine learning algorithmsPreprint
Jones, G. P., Hickey, J. M., Stefano, P. G. D., Dhanjal, C., Stoddart, L. C., & Vasileiou, V. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.03986 · Cited by 28
Evaluating and Mitigating Discrimination in Language Model Decisions
Tamkin, A., Askell, A., Lovitt, L., Durmus, E., Joseph, N., Kravec, S., Nguyen, K., Kaplan, J., & Ganguli, D. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.03689 · Cited by 11
“…studied how discrimination can happen directly , based on demographic variables, as well as indirectly though proxies for those variables, such as zip code, extracurricular activities, or other features (VanderWeele & Robinson, 2014; Datta et al., 2017; Kilbertus et al., 2017; Adler et al., 2018).”
BackgroundHeidrich, L., Slany, E., Scheele, S., & Schmid, U. (2023) · Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction · doi:10.3390/make5040076 · Cited by 14
Understanding User Sensemaking in Machine Learning Fairness Assessment Systems
Gu, Z., Yan, J. N., & Rzeszotarski, J. M. (2021) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3442381.3450092 · Cited by 15
Eliminating Latent Discrimination: Train Then Mask
Ghili, S., Kazemi, E. M., & Karbasi, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33013672 · Cited by 10
Forecasting day-ahead spot electricity prices using deep neural networks with attention mechanism
Marszałek, A., & Burczyński, T. (2021) · Journal of Smart Environments and Green Computing · doi:10.20517/jsegc.2021.02 · Cited by 9
Dynamic fairness - Breaking vicious cycles in automatic decision makingPreprint
Paaßen, B., Bunge, A., Hainke, C., Sindelar, L., & Vogelsang, M. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1902.00375 · Cited by 10
Advancing Subgroup Fairness via Sleeping ExpertsPreprint
Blum, A. L., & Lykouris, T. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.4230/lipics.itcs.2020.55 · Cited by 22
Removing biased data to improve fairness and accuracyPreprint
Verma, S., Ernst, M. D., & Just, R. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2102.03054 · Cited by 27
A Human-Centric Perspective on Fairness and Transparency in Algorithmic Decision-Making
Schoeffer, J. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts · doi:10.1145/3491101.3503811 · Cited by 9
The hard proxy problem: proxies aren’t intentional; they’re intentional
Johnson, G. M. (2025) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-025-02333-9 · Cited by 11
An Information-Theoretic Perspective on the Relationship Between Fairness and Accuracy.
Dutta, S., Wei, D., Yueksel, H., Chen, P., Liu, S., & Varshney, K. R. (2019) · Cited by 9
Doing good by fighting fraud: Ethical anti-fraud systems for mobile payments
Din, Z. A., Venugopalan, H., Lin, H., Wushensky, A., Liu, S., & King, S. T. (2021) · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (S&P) · doi:10.1109/sp40001.2021.00100 · Cited by 10
Mazilu, L., Paton, N. W., Κωνσταντίνου, Ν., & Fernandes, A. A. A. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration (IRI) · doi:10.1109/iri49571.2020.00056 · Cited by 9
A Quantum Leap for Fairness: Quantum Bayesian Approach for Fair Decision Making
Mutlu, E. Ç., & Garibay, Ö. Ö. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-90963-5_37 · Cited by 8
Rolf, E., Simchowitz, M., Dean, S., Liu, L. T., Björkegren, D., Hardt, M., & Blumenstock, J. E. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2003.06740 · Cited by 10
Self-citationGender Slopes: Counterfactual Fairness for Computer Vision Models by Attribute ManipulationPreprint
Joo, J., & Kärkkäinen, K. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.10430 · Cited by 9
Fairness On The Ground: Applying Algorithmic Fairness Approaches to Production SystemsPreprint
Bakalar, C., Barreto, R. D. C., Bergman, S., Bogen, M., Chern, B., Corbett‐Davies, S., Hall, M. A., Kloumann, I. M., Lam, M. S., Candela, J. Q., et al. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.06172 · Cited by 40
FADE: FAir Double Ensemble Learning for Observable and Counterfactual Outcomes
Mishler, A., & Kennedy, E. H. (2022) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533167 · Cited by 9
Fairness, explainability, privacy, and robustness for trustworthy algorithmic decision-making
Majumdar, S. (2023) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-85713-0.00017-7 · Cited by 10
Revisiting model fairness via adversarial examples
Zhang, T., Zhu, T., Li, J., Zhou, W., & Yu, P. S. (2023) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2023.110777 · Cited by 8
Shah, N. B., & Lipton, Z. C. (2020) · ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD) · doi:10.1145/3318464.3383129 · Cited by 9
Wang, H., Ustun, B., & Calmon, F. P. (2018) · IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT) · doi:10.1109/isit.2018.8437661 · Cited by 8
Counterfactual fairness: removing direct effects through regularizationPreprint
Stefano, P. G. D., Hickey, J. M., & Vasileiou, V. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2002.10774 · Cited by 28
Equitable Allocation of Healthcare Resources with Fair Cox ModelsPreprint
Keya, K. N., Islam, R., Pan, S., Stockwell, I., & Foulds, J. R. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.13016/m2linh-rxcx · Cited by 12
Disentangled Representations from Non-Disentangled ModelsPreprint
Khrulkov, V., Mirvakhabova, L., Oseledets, I. V., & Babenko, A. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2102.06204 · Cited by 11
What is fair? Proxy discrimination vs. demographic disparities in insurance pricingPreprint
Lindholm, M., Richman, R., Tsanakas, A., & Wüthrich, M. V. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4436409 · Cited by 8
Mitigating Biases in Hate Speech Detection from A Causal Perspective
Zhang, Z., Chen, J., & Yang, D. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.440 · Cited by 10
Towards Inclusive Software Engineering Through A/B Testing: A Case-Study at Windows
Niculescu, I., Hu, H. M., Gee, C., Chong, C., Dubey, S., & Li, P. L. (2021) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice (ICSE-SEIP) · doi:10.1109/icse-seip52600.2021.00027 · Cited by 7
Legal Taxonomies of Machine Bias: Revisiting Direct Discrimination
Binns, R., Adams‐Prassl, J., & Kelly‐Lyth, A. (2023) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3593013.3594121 · Cited by 8
Attesting Digital Discrimination Using Norms.
Criado, N., Ferrer, X., & Such, J. M. (2021) · International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.9781/ijimai.2021.02.008 · Cited by 15
Measuring Model Fairness under Noisy Covariates: A Theoretical Perspective
Prost, F., Awasthi, P., Blumm, N., Kumthekar, A., Potter, T., Li, W., Wang, X., Ed, H., Chen, J., & Beutel, A. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society · doi:10.1145/3461702.3462603 · Cited by 7
Learning Fair Rule ListsPreprint
Aïvodji, U., Ferry, J., Gambs, S., Huguet, M., & Siala, M. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1909.03977 · Cited by 14
Zhang, X., Long, X., Liu, Y., Zhou, K., & Li, J. (2024) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.14347 · Cited by 6
Fairness Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Decision Support: Mitigating Effect of Health Disparity
Wu, H., Zhu, Y., Shi, W., Li, T., & Wang, M. D. (2024) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2024.3513398 · Cited by 6
Fair Decision-Making for Food Inspections
Singh, S., Shah, B., Kanich, C., & Kash, I. A. (2022) · ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization (EAAMO) · doi:10.1145/3551624.3555289 · Cited by 9
Investigating the Role of Moral Decision-Making in Emerging Artificial Intelligence Technologies
Bennett, S. (2019) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/3311957.3361858 · Cited by 6
Mitigation of Unintended Biases against Non-Native English Texts in Sentiment Analysis.
Zhiltsova, A., Caton, S. J., & Mulway, C. (2019) · IASC · Cited by 7
Supervising Feature InfluencePreprint
Sen, S., Mardziel, P., Datta, A., & Fredrikson, M. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1803.10815 · Cited by 6
Fair Predictors under Distribution ShiftPreprint
Singh, H., Singh, R., Mhasawade, V., & Chunara, R. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 6
A Normative approach to Attest Digital DiscriminationPreprint
Criado, N., Ferrer, X., & Such, J. M. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.07092 · Cited by 6
Learning Fair Naive Bayes Classifiers by Discovering and Eliminating Discrimination Patterns
Choi, Y., Farnadi, G., Babaki, B., & Van den Broeck, G. (2020) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v34i06.6565 · Cited by 5
Fairness in Forecasting and Learning Linear Dynamical Systems
Zhou, Q. Z., Mareček, J., & Shorten, R. N. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i12.17328 · Cited by 10
Li, P. L., Chai, X., Campbell, F., Liao, J., Abburu, N., Kang, M., Niculescu, I., Brake, G., Patil, S., Dooley, J., et al. (2021) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice (ICSE-SEIP) · doi:10.1109/icse-seip52600.2021.00026 · Cited by 5
Achieving Fair Inference Using Error-Prone Outcomes.
Boeschoten, L., van Kesteren, E., Bagheri, A., & Oberski, D. L. (2021) · International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.9781/ijimai.2021.02.007 · Cited by 10
Interventional Fairness with Indirect Knowledge of Unobserved Protected Attributes
Galhotra, S., Shanmugam, K., Sattigeri, P., & Varshney, K. R. (2021) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e23121571 · Cited by 5
Protected attribute guided representation learning for bias mitigation in limited data
Mazumder, P., & Singh, P. P. (2022) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2022.108449 · Cited by 5
Learning Fair Classifiers via Min-Max F-divergence Regularization
Zhong, M., & Tandon, R. (2023) · Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing · doi:10.1109/allerton58177.2023.10313425 · Cited by 4
Disaggregated Interventions to Reduce Inequality
Bynum, L., Loftus, J. R., & Stoyanovich, J. (2021) · ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization (EAAMO) · doi:10.1145/3465416.3483286 · Cited by 5
Fairness Criteria through the Lens of Directed Acyclic Graphs
Baer, B. R., Gilbert, D. E., & Wells, M. T. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190067397.013.31 · Cited by 14
Weakly Supervised Machine Learning for Cyberbullying Detection
Raisi, E. (2019) · VTechWorks (Virginia Tech) · Cited by 5
Noise Induces Loss Discrepancy Across Groups for Linear Regression.Preprint
Khani, F., & Liang, P. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 5
Adomavicius, G., & Yang, M. (2019) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3446944 · Cited by 3
Fairness in Forecasting and Learning Linear Dynamical SystemsPreprint
Zhou, Q. Z., Mareček, J., & Shorten, R. N. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.07315 · Cited by 5
Information Theoretic Measures for Fairness-aware Feature SelectionPreprint
Khodadadian, S., Nafea, M., Ghassami, A., & Kiyavash, N. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.00772 · Cited by 5
Estimating the probabilities of causation via deep monotonic twin networks.Preprint
Vlontzos, A., Kainz, B., & Lee, C. M. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 5
Henning, A., & Langenbach, P. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4819145 · Cited by 5
Fairness in Algorithmic Profiling: The AMAS Case
Achterhold, E., Mühlböck, M., Steiber, N., & Kern, C. A. (2025) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-024-09706-9 · Cited by 12
A Review of Partial Information Decomposition in Algorithmic Fairness and Explainability
Dutta, S., & Hamman, F. (2023) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e25050795 · Cited by 4
Reconciling Predictive and Statistical Parity: A Causal Approach
Plečko, D., & Bareinboim, E. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i13.29379 · Cited by 5
Maksimenko, V., Li, X., Kim, E.-J., & Bansal, P. (2025) · Transportation Research Part C Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2025.105284 · Cited by 5
Counterfactual fairness: The case study of a food delivery platform’s reputational-ranking algorithm
Piccininni, M. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1015100 · Cited by 5
Fairness in Forecasting of Observations of Linear Dynamical Systems
Zhou, Q. Z., Mareček, J., & Shorten, R. N. (2023) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.1.14050 · Cited by 8
Intrinsic Fairness-Accuracy Tradeoffs Under Equalized Odds
Zhong, M., & Tandon, R. (2024) · IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT) · doi:10.1109/isit57864.2024.10619526 · Cited by 4
The Random Conditional Distribution for Higher-Order Probabilistic InferencePreprint
Tavares, Z., Zhang, X., Minaysan, E., Burroni, J., Ranganath, R., & Solar-Lezama, A. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1903.10556 · Cited by 4
Discrimination in Algorithmic Decision Making: From Principles to Measures and Mechanisms
Zafar, M. B. (2019) · MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) · doi:10.22028/d291-27726 · Cited by 4
Abstracting Fairness: Oracles, Metrics, and Interpretability
Dwork, C., Ilvento, C., Rothblum, G. N., & Sur, P. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.01840 · Cited by 8
The Impact of Presentation Style on Human-In-The-Loop Detection of Algorithmic BiasPreprint
Law, P.-M., Malik, S., Du, F., & Sinha, M. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.20380/gi2020.30 · Cited by 4
Fair Data Integration.Preprint
Galhotra, S., Shanmugam, K., Sattigeri, P., & Varshney, K. R. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 4
ViBE: A Tool for Measuring and Mitigating Bias in Image DatasetsPreprint
Wang, A., Narayanan, A., & Russakovsky, O. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 4
Unbiased Subdata Selection for Fair Classification: A Unified Framework and Scalable AlgorithmsPreprint
Ye, Q., & Xie, W. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.12356 · Cited by 4
fairadapt: Causal Reasoning for Fair Data Pre-processingPreprint
Plečko, D., Bennett, N., & Meinshausen, N. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.3929/ethz-b-000694309 · Cited by 4
Under the Radar -- Auditing Fairness in ML for Humanitarian Mapping
Kondmann, L., & Zhu, X. X. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.02137 · Cited by 3
Johnson, D. K. N. (2025) · The Review of Black Political Economy · doi:10.1177/00346446251331615 · Cited by 3
Towards Fair Federated Learning via Unbiased Feature Aggregation
He, Z., Wang, Z., Dong, X., Sun, P., Ren, J., & Ren, K. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing · doi:10.1109/tdsc.2025.3541306 · Cited by 3
Individual fair fuzzy C-means clustering via density-adaptive spectral regularization
Yan, B., Yang, Z., Zheng, J., Tang, Y., & Zhang, H. (2025) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2025.130794 · Cited by 3
Quantifying Bias in a Face Verification System
Frisella, M., Khorrami, P., Matterer, J., Kratkiewicz, K., & Torres‐Carrasquillo, P. A. (2022) · doi:10.3390/cmsf2022003006 · Cited by 3
Assessing and Enforcing Fairness in the AI Lifecycle
Calegari, R., Castañé, G. G., Milano, M., & O’Sullivan, B. (2023) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2023/735 · Cited by 8
FAIR2: A framework for addressing discrimination bias in social data science
Richter, F., Nelson, E., Coury, N., Bruckman, L. S., & Knighton, S. C. (2023) · International Conference on Advanced Research Methods and Analytics (CARMA) · doi:10.4995/carma2023.2023.16400 · Cited by 3
Generalizing Group Fairness in Machine Learning via Utilities
Blandin, J., & Kash, I. A. (2023) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.1.14238 · Cited by 6
Fair-MDAV: An Algorithm for Fair Privacy by Microaggregation
Salas, J., & González-Zelaya, V. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-57524-3_24 · Cited by 3
Non-Parametric Path Analysis in Structural Causal Models
Zhang, J., & Bareinboim, E. (2018) · Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence · Cited by 3
Algorithmic Fairness and its Limits in Group-Formation.
Sahlgren, O., & Laitinen, A. (2020) · Tampere University Institutional Repository (Tampere University) · Cited by 3
On Testing for Discrimination Using Causal Models
Chockler, H., & Halpern, J. Y. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v36i5.20494 · Cited by 3
Pooling of Causal Models under Counterfactual Fairness via Causal Judgement AggregationPreprint
Zennaro, F. M., & Ivanovska, M. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1805.09866 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Kilbertus, N., Rojas-Carulla, M., Parascandolo, G., Hardt, M., Janzing, D., & Schölkopf, B.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Society (DE)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2017
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1706.02744
- OpenAlex
- W2624319794
- Cited by
- 358
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 78 · 2019: 65 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 7
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Keywords
- algorithmic fairness, discrimination, protected characteristics, causal reasoning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
