The DOI matches its DataCite record; 13 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Avoiding Discrimination through Causal Reasoning
Open accessAbstract
Recent work on fairness in machine learning has focused on various statistical discrimination criteria and how they trade off. Most of these criteria are observational: They depend only on the joint distribution of predictor, protected attribute, features, and outcome. While convenient to work with, observational criteria have severe inherent limitations that prevent them from resolving matters of fairness conclusively. Going beyond observational criteria, we frame the problem of discrimination based on protected attributes in the language of causal reasoning. This viewpoint shifts attention from "What is the right fairness criterion?" to "What do we want to assume about the causal data generating process?" Through the lens of causality, we make several contributions. First, we crisply articulate why and when observational criteria fail, thus formalizing what was before a matter of opinion. Second, our approach exposes previously ignored subtleties and why they are fundamental to the problem. Finally, we put forward natural causal non-discrimination criteria and develop algorithms that satisfy them.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Although observational fairness criteria have inherent limitations (Kilbertus et al. 2017;Barocas, Hardt, and Narayanan 2019) such as indistinguishability, these criteria are appealing because of their ease of use.”
From Antidiscrimination Insurance Pricing: Regulations, Fairness Criteria, and Models (2024) · cites this paper as Kilbertus et al. 2017
In the citing paper
“Causal approaches can help to resolve these conceptual roadblocks since they allow to formalize the meaning of what makes observations similar [16].”
From Under the Radar -- Auditing Fairness in ML for Humanitarian Mapping (2021) · cites this paper as [16]
Citations
Cites
The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects
ROSENBAUM, P. R., & RUBIN, D. B. (1983) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/70.1.41 · Cited by 31,241
Dwork, C., Hardt, M., Pitassi, T., Reingold, O., & Zemel, R. (2012) · Proceedings of the 3rd Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference · doi:10.1145/2090236.2090255 · Cited by 3,501
Self-citationEquality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning
Hardt, M., Price, E., & Srebro, N. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1610.02413 · Cited by 2,536
Self-citationAngrist, J. D., & Krueger, A. B. (2001) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.15.4.69 · Cited by 2,355
Fair prediction with disparate impact: a study of bias in recidivism prediction instruments
Chouldechova, A. (2017) · Big Data · doi:10.1089/big.2016.0047 · Cited by 2,159
Certifying and Removing Disparate Impact
Feldman, M., Friedler, S. A., Moeller, J., Scheidegger, C., & Venkatasubramanian, S. (2015) · Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2783258.2783311 · Cited by 1,827
Bickel, P. J., Hammel, E. A., & O'Connell, J. W. (1975) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.187.4175.398 · Cited by 659
Zafar, M. B., Valera, I., Gomez Rodriguez, M., & Gummadi, K. P. (2017) · Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/3038912.3052660 · Cited by 632
VanderWeele, T. J., & Robinson, W. R. (2014) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/ede.0000000000000105 · Cited by 567
On the (im)possibility of fairness
Friedler, S. A., Scheidegger, C., & Venkatasubramanian, S. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1609.07236 · Cited by 247
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning
Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., & Galstyan, A. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3457607 · Cited by 5,812
Toward Causal Representation Learning
Scholkopf, B., Locatello, F., Bauer, S., Ke, N. R., Kalchbrenner, N., Goyal, A., & Bengio, Y. (2021) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2021.3058954 · Cited by 1,170
Self-citationFairness definitions explained
Verma, S., & Rubin, J. (2018) · Proceedings of the International Workshop on Software Fairness · doi:10.1145/3194770.3194776 · Cited by 1,124
Kusner, M. J., Loftus, J. R., Russell, C., & Silva, R. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.06856 · Cited by 995
Algorithmic Fairness: Choices, Assumptions, and Definitions
Mitchell, S., Potash, E., Barocas, S., D'Amour, A., & Lum, K. (2021) · Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application · doi:10.1146/annurev-statistics-042720-125902 · Cited by 687
Fairness of Exposure in Rankings
Singh, A., & Joachims, T. (2018) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3219819.3220088 · Cited by 673
Towards a standard for identifying and managing bias in artificial intelligence
Schwartz, R., Vassilev, A., Greene, K., Perine, L., Burt, A., & Hall, P. (2022) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.1270 · Cited by 548
“ination can arise from the encoding of spurious correlations and noisy local dependencies into ML systems during training, there is currently great focus on causal tools [210] and how they can formally incorporate effects of hypothetical actions to solve a wide range of fairness modeling problems.”
BackgroundFairness in machine learning: A survey
Caton, S., & Haas, C. (2024) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3616865 · Cited by 646
Mitigating Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing: Literature Review
Sun, T., Gaut, A., Tang, S., Huang, Y., ElSherief, M., Zhao, J., Mirza, D., Belding, E., Chang, K.-W., & Wang, W. Y. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1159 · Cited by 492
Causal Interpretations of Black-Box Models
Zhao, Q., & Hastie, T. J. (2019) · Journal of Business and Economic Statistics · doi:10.1080/07350015.2019.1624293 · Cited by 490
The Measure and Mismeasure of Fairness
Corbett-Davies, S., Gaebler, J. D., Nilforoshan, H., Shroff, R., & Goel, S. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1808.00023 · Cited by 444
Examining Gender and Race Bias in Two Hundred Sentiment Analysis Systems
Kiritchenko, S., & Mohammad, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the Seventh Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics · doi:10.18653/v1/s18-2005 · Cited by 384
Causality for Machine Learning
Schölkopf, B. (2022) · ACM eBooks · doi:10.1145/3501714.3501755 · Cited by 548
Self-citationRecent Advancements in Emerging Technologies for Healthcare Management Systems: A Survey
Junaid, S. B., Imam, A. A., Balogun, A. O., Silva, L. C. D., Surakat, Y. A., Kumar, G., Abdulkarim, M., Shuaibu, A. N., Garba, A., Sahalu, Y., et al. (2022) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare10101940 · Cited by 398
A snapshot of the frontiers of fairness in machine learning
Chouldechova, A., & Roth, A. (2020) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3376898 · Cited by 398
Bias and Discrimination in AI: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective
Ferrer, X., Nuenen, T. V., Such, J. M., Cote, M., & Criado, N. (2021) · IEEE Technology and Society Magazine · doi:10.1109/mts.2021.3056293 · Cited by 308
“In the graph, attributes are presented as nodes joined by edges which, by means of equations, represent the relations between attributes [10].”
BackgroundAlgorithmic fairness in education
Kizilcec, R. F., & Lee, H. (2022) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429329067-10 · Cited by 339
Oneto, L., & Chiappa, S. (2020) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-43883-8_7 · Cited by 328
Gender bias in artificial intelligence
Leavy, S. (2018) · doi:10.1145/3195570.3195580 · Cited by 285
Towards Fairness in Visual Recognition: Effective Strategies for Bias Mitigation
Wang, Z., Qinami, K., Karakozis, I. C., Genova, K., Nair, P., Hata, K., & Russakovsky, O. (2020) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00894 · Cited by 296
Chou, Y.-L., Moreira, C., Bruza, P., Ouyang, C., & Jorge, J. (2022) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2021.11.003 · Cited by 302
Towards Out-Of-Distribution Generalization: A Survey
Liu, J., Shen, Z., He, Y., Zhang, X., Xu, R., Yu, H., & Cui, P. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.13624 · Cited by 253
Stable learning establishes some common ground between causal inference and machine learning
Cui, P., & Athey, S. C. (2022) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-022-00445-z · Cited by 258
Rawal, A., McCoy, J., Rawat, D. B., Sadler, B. M., & Amant, R. S. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tai.2021.3133846 · Cited by 257
Causal interpretability for machine learning-problems, methods and evaluation
Moraffah, R., Karami, M., Guo, R., Raglin, A., & Liu, H. (2020) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/3400051.3400058 · Cited by 238
A Framework for Understanding Unintended Consequences of Machine Learning
Suresh, H., & Guttag, J. V. (2019) · Cited by 229
A clarification of the nuances in the fairness metrics landscape
Castelnovo, A., Crupi, R., Greco, G., Regoli, D., Penco, I. G., & Cosentini, A. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-07939-1 · Cited by 292
Causal Inference in Natural Language Processing: Estimation, Prediction, Interpretation and Beyond
Feder, A., Keith, K. A., Manzoor, E., Pryzant, R., Sridhar, D., Wood-Doughty, Z., Eisenstein, J., Grimmer, J., Reichart, R., Roberts, M. E., et al. (2022) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00511 · Cited by 220
Delayed Impact of Fair Machine Learning
Liu, L. T., Dean, S., Rolf, E., Simchowitz, M., & Hardt, M. (2019) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2019/862 · Cited by 265
Self-citationUncovering and Mitigating Algorithmic Bias through Learned Latent Structure
Amini, A., Soleimany, A. P., Schwarting, W., Bhatia, S. N., & Rus, D. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society · doi:10.1145/3306618.3314243 · Cited by 206
Grgic-Hlaca, N., Redmiles, E. M., Gummadi, K. P., & Weller, A. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference on World Wide Web - WWW '18 · doi:10.1145/3178876.3186138 · Cited by 207
Brown, A., Chouldechova, A., Putnam-Hornstein, E., Tobin, A., & Vaithianathan, R. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300271 · Cited by 207
Fairness in Decision-Making — The Causal Explanation Formula
Zhang, J., & Bareinboim, E. (2018) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v32i1.11564 · Cited by 219
Trustworthy ai: A computational perspective
Liu, H., Wang, Y., Fan, W., Liu, X., Li, Y., Jain, S., Liu, Y., Jain, A., & Tang, J. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3546872 · Cited by 261
Grgić-Hlača, N., Zafar, M. B., Gummadi, K. P., & Weller, A. (2018) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v32i1.11296 · Cited by 184
An empirical characterization of fair machine learning for clinical risk prediction
Pfohl, S. R., Foryciarz, A., & Shah, N. H. (2021) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103621 · Cited by 164
Fairness and Explanation in AI-Informed Decision Making
Angerschmid, A., Zhou, J., Theuermann, K., Chen, F., & Holzinger, A. (2022) · Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction · doi:10.3390/make4020026 · Cited by 161
Empirical Risk Minimization under Fairness ConstraintsPreprint
Donini, M., Oneto, L., Ben-David, S., Shawe-Taylor, J. S., & Pontil, M. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1802.08626 · Cited by 190
Operationalising ethics in artificial intelligence for healthcare: a framework for AI developers
Solanki, P., Grundy, J., & Hussain, W. (2023) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-022-00195-z · Cited by 157
“Apply causal reasoning to identify and understand and discrimination based on protected attributes [128]”
BackgroundOn Formalizing Fairness in Prediction with Machine LearningPreprint
Gajane, P., & Pechenizkiy, M. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1710.03184 · Cited by 152
Interventional Fairness: Causal Database Repair for Algorithmic Fairness
Salimi, B., Rodriguez, L., Howe, B., & Suciu, D. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Management of Data · doi:10.1145/3299869.3319901 · Cited by 145
Towards Personalized Fairness based on Causal Notion
Li, Y., Chen, H., Xu, S., Ge, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2021) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/3404835.3462966 · Cited by 145
Avoiding an Oppressive Future of Machine Learning: A Design Theory for Emancipatory assistants
Kane, G. C., Young, A., Majchrzak, A., & Ransbotham, S. (2021) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2021/1578 · Cited by 151
The Disparate Effects of Strategic Manipulation
Hu, L. J., Immorlica, N., & Vaughan, J. W. (2019) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3287560.3287597 · Cited by 135
Fairness in Machine Learning: A Survey
Caton, S., & Haas, C. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.04053 · Cited by 646
Reducing Sentiment Bias in Language Models via Counterfactual Evaluation
Huang, P.-S., Zhang, H., Jiang, R., Stanforth, R., Welbl, J., Rae, J., Maini, V., Yogatama, D., & Kohli, P. (2020) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2020 · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.findings-emnlp.7 · Cited by 124
Artificial Intelligence and Music: Open Questions of Copyright Law and Engineering Praxis
Sturm, B. L. T., Iglesias, M., Ben-Tal, O., Miron, M., & Gómez, E. (2019) · Arts · doi:10.3390/arts8030115 · Cited by 82
Algorithmic Fairness from a Non-ideal Perspective
Fazelpour, S., & Lipton, Z. C. (2020) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society · doi:10.1145/3375627.3375828 · Cited by 136
An empirical study on the perceived fairness of realistic, imperfect machine learning models
Harrison, G., Hanson, J., Jacinto, C., Ramirez, J., & Ur, B. (2020) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3351095.3372831 · Cited by 120
Putting Fairness Principles into Practice: Challenges, Metrics, and Improvements
Beutel, A., Chen, J., Doshi, T., Qian, H., Woodruff, A., Luu, C., Kreitmann, P., Bischof, J., & Chi, E. H. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society · doi:10.1145/3306618.3314234 · Cited by 111
Racial categories in machine learning
Benthall, S., & Haynes, B. D. (2019) · Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3287560.3287575 · Cited by 110
Pessach, D., & Shmueli, E. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-24628-9_37 · Cited by 235
Fairness through Causal Awareness
Madras, D., Creager, E., Pitassi, T., & Zemel, R. S. (2019) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3287560.3287564 · Cited by 116
Conditional variance penalties and domain shift robustness
Heinze‐Deml, C., & Meinshausen, N. (2020) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-020-05924-1 · Cited by 132
Policy Learning for Fairness in RankingPreprint
Singh, A., & Joachims, T. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1902.04056 · Cited by 122
Balayn, A., Lofi, C., & Houben, G.-J. (2021) · The VLDB Journal · doi:10.1007/s00778-021-00671-8 · Cited by 98
Fair Class Balancing: Enhancing Model Fairness without Observing Sensitive Attributes
Yan, S., Kao, H.-T., & Ferrara, E. (2020) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3340531.3411980 · Cited by 112
Counterfactual risk assessments, evaluation, and fairness
Coston, A., Mishler, A., Kennedy, E. H., & Chouldechova, A. (2020) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3351095.3372851 · Cited by 107
Fairness in Algorithmic Decision Making: An Excursion Through the Lens of Causality
Khademi, A., Lee, S., Foley, D., & Honavar, V. (2019) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3308558.3313559 · Cited by 95
Explaining Black-Box Algorithms Using Probabilistic Contrastive Counterfactuals
Galhotra, S., Pradhan, R., & Salimi, B. (2021) · ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD) · doi:10.1145/3448016.3458455 · Cited by 95
Residual unfairness in fair machine learning from prejudiced data
Kallus, N., & Zhou, A. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1806.02887 · Cited by 83
A Framework for Understanding Sources of Harm throughout the Machine Learning Life Cycle
Suresh, H., & Guttag, J. (2021) · Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization · doi:10.1145/3465416.3483305 · Cited by 82
Stoyanovich, J., Howe, B., & Jagadish, H. V. (2020) · Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment · doi:10.14778/3415478.3415570 · Cited by 89
Bridging Machine Learning and Mechanism Design towards Algorithmic Fairness
Finocchiaro, J., Maio, R., Monachou, F., Patro, G. K., Raghavan, M., Stoica, A.-A., & Tsirtsis, S. (2021) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445912 · Cited by 89
REVISE: A Tool for Measuring and Mitigating Bias in Visual Datasets
Wang, A., Liu, A., Zhang, R., Kleiman, A., Kim, L., Zhao, D., Shirai, I., Narayanan, A., & Russakovsky, O. (2022) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-022-01625-5 · Cited by 95
Algorithmic Recourse: from Counterfactual Explanations to Interventions
Karimi, A.-H., Schölkopf, B., & Valera, I. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2002.06278 · Cited by 76
Self-citationWhat's sex got to do with machine learning?
Hu, L., & Kohler-Hausmann, I. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3351095.3375674 · Cited by 74
Fair classification and social welfare
Hu, L. J., & Chen, Y. (2020) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3351095.3372857 · Cited by 80
Grgić-Hlača, N., Redmiles, E. M., Gummadi, K. P., & Weller, A. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1802.09548 · Cited by 75
Causal Reasoning for Algorithmic FairnessPreprint
Loftus, J. R., Russell, C., Kusner, M. J., & Silva, R. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1805.05859 · Cited by 163
Counterfactual Fairness: Unidentification, Bound and Algorithm
Wu, Y., Zhang, L., & Wu, X. (2019) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2019/199 · Cited by 73
On the Applicability of Machine Learning Fairness Notions
Makhlouf, K., Zhioua, S., & Catuscia Palamidessi, A. (2021) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/3468507.3468511 · Cited by 96
REVISE: A Tool for Measuring and Mitigating Bias in Visual Datasets
Wang, A., Narayanan, A., & Russakovsky, O. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58580-8_43 · Cited by 73
Asymmetric Shapley values: incorporating causal knowledge into model-agnostic explainabilityPreprint
Frye, C., Rowat, C., & Feige, I. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.06358 · Cited by 93
Perfectly parallel fairness certification of neural networks
Urban, C., Christakis, M., Wüstholz, V., & Zhang, F. (2020) · Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages · doi:10.1145/3428253 · Cited by 62
Detecting Bias with Generative Counterfactual Face Attribute AugmentationPreprint
Denton, E., Hutchinson, B., Mitchell, M., & Gebru, T. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 61
Machine learning fairness notions: Bridging the gap with real-world applications
Makhlouf, K., Zhioua, S., & Catuscia Palamidessi, A. (2021) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102642 · Cited by 94
Secure and robust machine learning for healthcare: A survey
Qayyum, A., Qadir, J., Bilal, M., & Al-Fuqaha, A. (2021) · IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/rbme.2020.3013489 · Cited by 59
Nanda, V., Dooley, S. W., Singla, S., Feizi, S., & Dickerson, J. P. (2021) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445910 · Cited by 77
Probabilistic verification of fairness properties via concentration
Bastani, O., Zhang, X., & Solar-Lezama, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages · doi:10.1145/3360544 · Cited by 57
Creating Fair Models of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk
Pfohl, S. R., Marafino, B. J., Coulet, A., Rodriguez, F., Palaniappan, L., & Shah, N. (2018) · AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society · doi:10.1145/3306618.3314278 · Cited by 79
FairBatch: Batch Selection for Model FairnessPreprint
Roh, Y., Lee, K., Whang, S. E., & Suh, C. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.01696 · Cited by 56
On the Fairness of Causal Algorithmic Recourse
Kügelgen, J. V., Karimi, A.-H., Bhatt, U., Valera, I., Weller, A., & Schölkopf, B. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v36i9.21192 · Cited by 58
Self-citationWoodcock, C., Mittelstadt, B., Busbridge, D., & Blank, G. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/29386 · Cited by 59
Shrestha, Y. R., & Yang, Y. (2019) · Algorithms · doi:10.3390/a12090199 · Cited by 62
On the Fairness of Disentangled RepresentationsPreprint
Locatello, F., Abbati, G., Rainforth, T., Bauer, S., Schölkopf, B., & Bachem, O. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.13662 · Cited by 78
Self-citationVisual Analysis of Discrimination in Machine Learning
Wang, Q., Xu, Z., Chen, Z., Wang, Y., Liu, S., & Qu, H. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2020.3030471 · Cited by 54
Interpretable Data-Based Explanations for Fairness Debugging
Pradhan, R., Zhu, J., Glavic, B., & Salimi, B. (2022) · ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD) · doi:10.1145/3514221.3517886 · Cited by 65
Mahmud, B. U., Hong, G. Y., & Fong, B. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and Applications · doi:10.1145/3542698 · Cited by 74
Fairness in Semi-Supervised Learning: Unlabeled Data Help to Reduce Discrimination
Zhang, T., Zhu, T., Li, J., Han, M., Zhou, W., & Yu, P. S. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2020.3002567 · Cited by 60
Why Fairness Cannot Be Automated: Bridging the Gap Between EU Non-Discrimination Law and AIPreprint
Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B., & Russell, C. (2020) · Computer Law and Security Review · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3547922 · Cited by 448
Silva: Interactively Assessing Machine Learning Fairness Using Causality
Yan, J. N., Gu, Z., Lin, H., & Rzeszotarski, J. M. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376447 · Cited by 54
Albarghouthi, A., & Vinitsky, S. (2019) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3287560.3287588 · Cited by 52
AI and Algorithmic Bias: Source, Detection, Mitigation and Implications
Fu, R., Huang, Y. H., & Singh, P. V. (2020) · doi:10.1287/educ.2020.0215 · Cited by 130
Causal Modeling-Based Discrimination Discovery and Removal: Criteria, Bounds, and Algorithms
Zhang, L., Wu, Y., & Wu, X. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2018.2872988 · Cited by 56
Glymour, B., & Herington, J. (2019) · Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3287560.3287573 · Cited by 50
Fairness in Risk Assessment Instruments
Mishler, A., Kennedy, E. H., & Chouldechova, A. (2021) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445902 · Cited by 74
Procedural fairness in algorithmic decision-making: the role of public engagement
Decker, M. C., Wegner, L., & Leicht-Scholten, C. (2024) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-024-09811-4 · Cited by 69
Fair Regression with Wasserstein Barycenters
Chzhen, E., Denis, C., Hebiri, M., Oneto, L., & Pontil, M. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.07286 · Cited by 46
“…methods that satisfy “fairness” requirements, while still optimizing prediction performance, see for example [5, 10, 13, 16, 17, 20, 22, 24, 25, 27, 32, 45–47 In this paper we study the problem of learning a real-valued regression function which among those complying with the Demographic…”
MethodRaghavan, M. (2023) · ACM eBooks · doi:10.1145/3603195.3603207 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Kilbertus, N., Rojas-Carulla, M., Parascandolo, G., Hardt, M., Janzing, D., & Schölkopf, B.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Society (DE)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2017
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1706.02744
- OpenAlex
- W2624319794
- Cited by
- 358
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 78 · 2019: 65 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 7
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Keywords
- algorithmic fairness, discrimination, protected characteristics, causal reasoning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
