Evaluating and Mitigating Discrimination in Language Model Decisions
Open accessAbstract
As language models (LMs) advance, interest is growing in applying them to high-stakes societal decisions, such as determining financing or housing eligibility. However, their potential for discrimination in such contexts raises ethical concerns, motivating the need for better methods to evaluate these risks. We present a method for proactively evaluating the potential discriminatory impact of LMs in a wide range of use cases, including hypothetical use cases where they have not yet been deployed. Specifically, we use an LM to generate a wide array of potential prompts that decision-makers may input into an LM, spanning 70 diverse decision scenarios across society, and systematically vary the demographic information in each prompt. Applying this methodology reveals patterns of both positive and negative discrimination in the Claude 2.0 model in select settings when no interventions are applied. While we do not endorse or permit the use of language models to make automated decisions for the high-risk use cases we study, we demonstrate techniques to significantly decrease both positive and negative discrimination through careful prompt engineering, providing pathways toward safer deployment in use cases where they may be appropriate. Our work enables developers and policymakers to anticipate, measure, and address discrimination as language model capabilities and applications continue to expand. We release our dataset and prompts at https://huggingface.co/datasets/Anthropic/discrim-eval
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The stigma experiment was adapted from Pescosolido et al. [109].
“To assess whether LLMs show stigma, we conducted an experiment adapted from Pescosolido et al. [109] (cf. [136]).”
From Expressing stigma and inappropriate responses prevents LLMs from safely replacing mental health providers. (2025) · cites this paper as [136]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations
Obermeyer, Z., Powers, B., Vogeli, C., & Mullainathan, S. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aax2342 · Cited by 7,137 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…2015; Ali et al., 2019; Imana et al., 2021), mortgage approvals (Martinez & Kirchner, 2021), resume screening (Dastin, 2018), recidivism prediction (Skeem & Lowenkamp, 2016), hiring (Kirk et al., 2021; Bommasani et al., 2022a; Veldanda et al., 2023), and medical treatment (Obermeyer et al., 2019).”
BackgroundOn the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big? 🦜
Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445922 · Cited by 6,988 · see citing works
Large language models in medicine
Thirunavukarasu, A. J., Ting, D. S. J., Elangovan, K., Gutierrez, L., Tan, T. F., & Ting, D. S. W. (2023) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-023-02448-8 · Cited by 3,944 · cited 1× · see citing works
“As language models are increasingly adopted across society, interest is growing in deploying them in an expanding range of societal applications, from finance to medicine, to routine business tasks (Wu et al., 2023; Thirunavukarasu et al., 2023).”
BackgroundDwork, C., Hardt, M., Pitassi, T., Reingold, O., & Zemel, R. (2012) · Proceedings of the 3rd Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference · doi:10.1145/2090236.2090255 · Cited by 3,501 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In response, researchers and activists have developed a range of theoretical frameworks (Dwork et al., 2012; Kusner et al., 2017; Ustun et al., 2019) as well as investigative practices (Raji & Buolamwini, 2019; Metaxa et al., 2021; Vecchione et al., 2021; Bandy, 2021), to detect and counteract such…”
BackgroundLarge language models are zero-shot reasoners
Kojima, T., Gu, S. (., Reid, M., Matsuo, Y., & Iwasawa, Y. (2022) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 · doi:10.52202/068431-1613 · Cited by 2,013 · cited 1× · see citing works
“We also insert requests asking the model to verbalize its reasoning process (Kojima et al., 2022) while keeping into account various fairness constraints.”
MethodAlgorithmic Decision Making and the Cost of Fairness
Corbett-Davies, S., Pierson, E., Feller, A., Goel, S., & Huq, A. Z. (2017) · Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3097983.309809 · Cited by 1,464 · cited 1×
“As a step in this direction, we focus on measuring the risk of widespread automated discrimination (Corbett-Davies et al., 2017; Kasy & Abebe, 2021; Starke et al., 2022; Creel & Hellman, 2022) via automated language model decisions.”
BackgroundRed Teaming Language Models with Language ModelsPreprint
Perez, E., Huang, S., Song, F., Cai, T., Ring, R., Aslanides, J., Glaese, A., McAleese, N., & Irving, G. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2202.03286 · Cited by 1,430 · cited 6× · see citing works
“Our work complements these studies by using language models to generate the correspondence studies (across a wide range of hypothetical scenarios) and evaluating machine learning models as subjects in the correspondence studies (in order to quantify discrimination in LMs).”
MethodInfluentialAutomation bias: a systematic review of frequency, effect mediators, and mitigators
Goddard, K., Roudsari, A., & Wyatt, J. C. (2012) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000089 · Cited by 1,162 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In addition, models interact with people and institutions in complex ways, including via automation bias (Skitka et al., 1999; Goddard et al., 2012), meaning that while AI-aided decision-making can have positive effects (Keding & Meissner, 2021), placing humans in an advisory in-the-loop capacity…”
BackgroundField Experiments on Discrimination
Bertrand, M., & Duflo, E. (2016) · Handbook of economic field experiments · doi:10.1016/bs.hefe.2016.08.004 · Cited by 924 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…of acceptance rates across such characteristics is then considered evidence of discrimination, and such studies have uncovered discrimination in fields as diverse as hiring, housing, and lending (Cain, 1996; Riach & Rich, 2002; Bertrand & Mullainathan, 2004; Pager, 2007; Bertrand & Duflo, 2017).”
BackgroundField Experiments of Discrimination in the Market Place
Riach, P. A., & Rich, J. (2002) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/1468-0297.00080 · Cited by 911 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…of acceptance rates across such characteristics is then considered evidence of discrimination, and such studies have uncovered discrimination in fields as diverse as hiring, housing, and lending (Cain, 1996; Riach & Rich, 2002; Bertrand & Mullainathan, 2004; Pager, 2007; Bertrand & Duflo, 2017).”
BackgroundImpact of marker density on the accuracy of association mapping
Zhang, W.-H., Lau, W., Hu, C., & Kuo, T.-Y. (2007) · BMC Proceedings · doi:10.1186/1753-6561-1-s1-s166 · Cited by 786
Discrimination in online ad delivery
Sweeney, L. (2013) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/2447976.2447990 · Cited by 783 · cited 2× · see citing works
“For example, Sweeney (2013) study discrimination in online ad delivery, finding that ads suggesting an arrest record are more likely to be shown with searches of Black-associated names.”
BackgroundMethodDoes automation bias decision-making?
SKITKA, L. J., MOSIER, K. L., & BURDICK, M. (1999) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1006/ijhc.1999.0252 · Cited by 694 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In addition, models interact with people and institutions in complex ways, including via automation bias (Skitka et al., 1999; Goddard et al., 2012), meaning that while AI-aided decision-making can have positive effects (Keding & Meissner, 2021), placing humans in an advisory in-the-loop capacity…”
BackgroundAutomated Experiments on Ad Privacy Settings: A Tale of Opacity, Choice, and Discrimination
Datta, A., Tschantz, M. C., & Datta, A. (2015) · Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies · doi:10.1515/popets-2015-0007 · Cited by 676 · cited 1× · see citing works
“A range of other investigations have further studied algorithmic discrimination, including in other ad delivery settings (Datta et al., 2015; Ali et al., 2019; Imana et al., 2021), mortgage approvals (Martinez & Kirchner, 2021), resume screening (Dastin, 2018), recidivism prediction (Skeem &…”
BackgroundBias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Survey
Gallegos, I. O., Rossi, R. A., Barrow, J., Tanjim, M. M., Kim, S., Dernoncourt, F., Yu, T., Zhang, R., & Ahmed, N. K. (2024) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli_a_00524 · Cited by 665 · see citing works
Raji, I. D., & Buolamwini, J. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society · doi:10.1145/3306618.3314244 · Cited by 651 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…and activists have developed a range of theoretical frameworks (Dwork et al., 2012; Kusner et al., 2017; Ustun et al., 2019) as well as investigative practices (Raji & Buolamwini, 2019; Metaxa et al., 2021; Vecchione et al., 2021; Bandy, 2021), to detect and counteract such discrimination.”
BackgroundFantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivity
Lu, Y., Bartolo, M., Moore, A., Riedel, S., & Stenetorp, P. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.08786 · Cited by 615 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Finally, the sensitivity of models to small changes in prompts is an unsolved problem (Lu et al., 2021; Ganguli & Favaro, 2023), and despite our efforts it remains possible that variations in the construction of our prompts (including the phrasing of the prompts, the examples we included in the…”
BackgroundFantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivity
Lu, Y., Bartolo, M., Moore, A., Riedel, S., & Stenetorp, P. (2022) · Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.556 · Cited by 610 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Finally, the sensitivity of models to small changes in prompts is an unsolved problem (Lu et al., 2021; Ganguli & Favaro, 2023), and despite our efforts it remains possible that variations in the construction of our prompts (including the phrasing of the prompts, the examples we included in the…”
BackgroundVanderWeele, T. J., & Robinson, W. R. (2014) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/ede.0000000000000105 · Cited by 567 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…studied how discrimination can happen directly , based on demographic variables, as well as indirectly though proxies for those variables, such as zip code, extracurricular activities, or other features (VanderWeele & Robinson, 2014; Datta et al., 2017; Kilbertus et al., 2017; Adler et al., 2018).”
BackgroundActionable Recourse in Linear Classification
Ustun, B., Spangher, A., & Liu, Y. (2019) · Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3287560.3287566 · Cited by 501 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In response, researchers and activists have developed a range of theoretical frameworks (Dwork et al., 2012; Kusner et al., 2017; Ustun et al., 2019) as well as investigative practices (Raji & Buolamwini, 2019; Metaxa et al., 2021; Vecchione et al., 2021; Bandy, 2021), to detect and counteract such…”
BackgroundPager, D. (2006) · The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science · doi:10.1177/0002716206294796 · Cited by 500 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…of acceptance rates across such characteristics is then considered evidence of discrimination, and such studies have uncovered discrimination in fields as diverse as hiring, housing, and lending (Cain, 1996; Riach & Rich, 2002; Bertrand & Mullainathan, 2004; Pager, 2007; Bertrand & Duflo, 2017).”
BackgroundPrompting GPT-3 To Be ReliablePreprint
Si, C., Gan, Z., Yang, Z.-Y., Wang, S.-H., Wang, J., Boyd-Graber, J. L., & Wang, L.-J. (2022) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.09150 · Cited by 395 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In the context of LMs, Schick et al. (2021) note that language models can recognize toxicity in their own outputs, and Si et al. (2022) demonstrated that the right prompts could reduce bias in language models on the BBQ benchmark (Parrish et al., 2021 Model-generated evaluations Finally, a range of…”
BackgroundRed Teaming Language Models with Language Models
Perez, E., Huang, S., Song, F., Cai, T., Ring, R., Aslanides, J., Glaese, A., McAleese, N., & Irving, G. (2022) · Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.225 · Cited by 363 · cited 6× · see citing works
“Our work complements these studies by using language models to generate the correspondence studies (across a wide range of hypothetical scenarios) and evaluating machine learning models as subjects in the correspondence studies (in order to quantify discrimination in LMs).”
MethodInfluentialAvoiding Discrimination through Causal Reasoning
Kilbertus, N., Rojas-Carulla, M., Parascandolo, G., Hardt, M., Janzing, D., & Schölkopf, B. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.02744 · Cited by 358 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…studied how discrimination can happen directly , based on demographic variables, as well as indirectly though proxies for those variables, such as zip code, extracurricular activities, or other features (VanderWeele & Robinson, 2014; Datta et al., 2017; Kilbertus et al., 2017; Adler et al., 2018).”
BackgroundBloombergGPT: A Large Language Model for Finance
Wu, S., Irsoy, O., Lu, S., Dabravolski, V., Dredze, M., Gehrmann, S., Kambadur, P., Rosenberg, D., & Mann, G. (2023) · arXiv · Cited by 357 · cited 1× · see citing works
“As language models are increasingly adopted across society, interest is growing in deploying them in an expanding range of societal applications, from finance to medicine, to routine business tasks (Wu et al., 2023; Thirunavukarasu et al., 2023).”
BackgroundInternal, External, and Ecological Validity in Research Design, Conduct, and Evaluation
Andrade, C. (2018) · Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine · doi:10.4103/ijpsym.ijpsym_334_18 · Cited by 321 · cited 1× · see citing works
“An inherent challenge of evaluations is external validity : ensuring the conclusions of a research study generalize to real-world settings (Andrade, 2018).”
BackgroundCarayon, P., Hancock, P. A., Leveson, N. G., Noy, I. Y., Sznelwar, L. I., & Hootegem, G. V. (2015) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139.2015.1015623 · Cited by 312 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Instead, we expect that a sociotechnical lens (Carayon et al., 2015) will be necessary to ensure beneficial outcomes for these technologies, including both policies within individual firms as well as the broader policy and regulatory environment.”
BackgroundHow Black Are Lakisha and Jamal? Racial Perceptions from Names Used in Correspondence Audit Studies
Gaddis, S. M. (2017) · Sociological Science · doi:10.15195/v4.a19 · Cited by 307 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Fourth, choosing names in audit studies that are associated with different demographics can be challenging (Gaddis, 2017; Crabtree & Chykina, 2018); while we make a best effort in this study, more work is necessary, as well as an investigation into other sources of proxy discrimination.”
BackgroundAuditing black-box models for indirect influence
Adler, P., Falk, C., Friedler, S. A., Nix, T., Rybeck, G., Scheidegger, C., Smith, B., & Venkatasubramanian, S. (2018) · Knowledge and Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10115-017-1116-3 · Cited by 280 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…studied how discrimination can happen directly , based on demographic variables, as well as indirectly though proxies for those variables, such as zip code, extracurricular activities, or other features (VanderWeele & Robinson, 2014; Datta et al., 2017; Kilbertus et al., 2017; Adler et al., 2018).”
BackgroundSunman, W. (1999) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)76669-1 · Cited by 272 · cited 1×
“A natural question raised by our work is under what circum-stances (and to what degree) positive discrimination should be corrected for, given arguments raised by proponents and critics of affirmative action policies and compensatory justice (Fullinwider, 2018; Dwork et al., 2012; Eidelson, 2015).”
BackgroundCo-Writing with Opinionated Language Models Affects Users’ Views
Jakesch, M., Bhat, A., Buschek, D., Zalmanson, L., & Naaman, M. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3581196 · Cited by 265 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…real world, people might use a wider variety of input formats, including longer, supplementary documents such as resumes or medical records, or might engage in more interactive dialogues with models (Jakesch et al., 2023; Li et al., 2023a), each of which has the potential to affect our conclusions.”
BackgroundThe Fallacy of AI Functionality
Raji, I. D., Kumar, I. E., Horowitz, A., & Selbst, A. (2022) · 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533158 · Cited by 251 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Finally, discrimination and other fairness criteria are not the only important factors when deciding whether or not to deploy a model; models must be evaluated in naturalistic settings to ensure they perform satisfactorily at the tasks they are applied to (Raji et al., 2022; Sanchez et al., 2023).”
BackgroundKirk, H. R., Jun, Y., Volpin, F., Iqbal, H., Benussi, E., Dreyer, F., Shtedritski, A., & Asano, Y. M. (2021) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2102.04130 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
Spriggs, W. E., Fix, M. E., & Struyk, R. J. (1994) · Industrial and Labor Relations Review · doi:10.2307/2524673 · Cited by 228 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…of acceptance rates across such characteristics is then considered evidence of discrimination, and such studies have uncovered discrimination in fields as diverse as hiring, housing, and lending (Cain, 1996; Riach & Rich, 2002; Bertrand & Mullainathan, 2004; Pager, 2007; Bertrand & Duflo, 2017).”
BackgroundSelf-Diagnosis and Self-Debiasing: A Proposal for Reducing Corpus-Based Bias in NLP
Schick, T., Udupa, S., & Schütze, H. (2021) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00434 · Cited by 227 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In the context of LMs, Schick et al. (2021) note that language models can recognize toxicity in their own outputs, and Si et al. (2022) demonstrated that the right prompts could reduce bias in language models on the BBQ benchmark (Parrish et al., 2021 Model-generated evaluations Finally, a range of recent works explor…”
BackgroundAuditing Algorithms: Understanding Algorithmic Systems from the Outside In
Metaxa, D., Park, J., Robertson, R. E., Karahalios, K., Wilson, C., Hancock, J., & Sandvig, C. (2021) · Found. Trends Hum. Comput. Interact. · doi:10.1561/1100000083 · Cited by 218 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…and activists have developed a range of theoretical frameworks (Dwork et al., 2012; Kusner et al., 2017; Ustun et al., 2019) as well as investigative practices (Raji & Buolamwini, 2019; Metaxa et al., 2021; Vecchione et al., 2021; Bandy, 2021), to detect and counteract such discrimination.”
BackgroundDiscovering Language Model Behaviors with Model-Written Evaluations
Perez, E., Ringer, S., Lukosiute, K., Nguyen, K., Chen, E., Heiner, S., Pettit, C., Olsson, C., Kundu, S., Kadavath, S., et al. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023 · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.847 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Self-citationFairness, Equality, and Power in Algorithmic Decision-Making
Kasy, M., & Abebe, R. (2021) · Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445919 · Cited by 193 · cited 1× · see citing works
“As a step in this direction, we focus on measuring the risk of widespread automated discrimination (Corbett-Davies et al., 2017; Kasy & Abebe, 2021; Starke et al., 2022; Creel & Hellman, 2022) via automated language model decisions.”
BackgroundProblematic Machine Behavior: A Systematic Literature Review of Algorithm Audits
Bandy, J. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3449148 · Cited by 193 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…and activists have developed a range of theoretical frameworks (Dwork et al., 2012; Kusner et al., 2017; Ustun et al., 2019) as well as investigative practices (Raji & Buolamwini, 2019; Metaxa et al., 2021; Vecchione et al., 2021; Bandy, 2021), to detect and counteract such discrimination.”
BackgroundBBQ: A Hand-Built Bias Benchmark for Question Answering
Parrish, A., Chen, A., Nangia, N., Padmakumar, V., Phang, J., Thompson, J., Htut, P. M., & Bowman, S. R. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.08193 · Cited by 189 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…toxicity in their own outputs, and Si et al. (2022) demonstrated that the right prompts could reduce bias in language models on the BBQ benchmark (Parrish et al., 2021 Model-generated evaluations Finally, a range of recent works explore how LMs can assist in scalably generating diverse…”
BackgroundBBQ: A hand-built bias benchmark for question answering
Parrish, A., Chen, A., Nangia, N., Padmakumar, V., Phang, J., Thompson, J., Htut, P. M., & Bowman, S. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2022 · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-acl.165 · Cited by 186 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…toxicity in their own outputs, and Si et al. (2022) demonstrated that the right prompts could reduce bias in language models on the BBQ benchmark (Parrish et al., 2021 Model-generated evaluations Finally, a range of recent works explore how LMs can assist in scalably generating diverse…”
BackgroundRacial Discrimination and White-collar Workers in Britain
Jowell, R., & Prescott-clarke, P. (1970) · Race · doi:10.1177/030639687001100401 · Cited by 183 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The gold standard for investigating this question would be to analyze language model decisions in specific real-world applications, following the rich tradition of audit studies in the social sciences (Jowell & Prescott-Clarke, 1970; Gaddis, 2018).”
BackgroundInfluentialKeding, C., & Meissner, P. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120970 · Cited by 168 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…and institutions in complex ways, including via automation bias (Skitka et al., 1999; Goddard et al., 2012), meaning that while AI-aided decision-making can have positive effects (Keding & Meissner, 2021), placing humans in an advisory in-the-loop capacity is not by itself a sufficient guardrail.”
BackgroundAn Introduction to Audit Studies in the Social Sciences
Gaddis, S. M. (2018) · Audit Studies: Behind the Scenes with Theory, Method, and Nuance · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-71153-9_1 · Cited by 157 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The gold standard for investigating this question would be to analyze language model decisions in specific real-world applications, following the rich tradition of audit studies in the social sciences (Jowell & Prescott-Clarke, 1970; Gaddis, 2018).”
BackgroundInfluentialEidelson, B. (2015) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198732877.001.0001 · Cited by 153 · cited 1× · see citing works
“A natural question raised by our work is under what circum-stances (and to what degree) positive discrimination should be corrected for, given arguments raised by proponents and critics of affirmative action policies and compensatory justice (Fullinwider, 2018; Dwork et al., 2012; Eidelson, 2015).”
BackgroundEliciting Human Preferences with Language ModelsPreprint
Li, B. Z., Tamkin, A., Goodman, N. D., & Andreas, J. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.11589 · Cited by 135 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…real world, people might use a wider variety of input formats, including longer, supplementary documents such as resumes or medical records, or might engage in more interactive dialogues with models (Jakesch et al., 2023; Li et al., 2023a), each of which has the potential to affect our conclusions.”
BackgroundSelf-citationA Survey on Fairness in Large Language ModelsPreprint
Li, Y., Du, M.-N., Song, R., Wang, X., & Wang, Y. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.10149 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Surface Form Competition: Why the Highest Probability Answer Isn’t Always Right
Holtzman, A., West, P., Shwartz, V., Choi, Y., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.564 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Auditing for Discrimination in Algorithms Delivering Job Ads
Imana, B., Korolova, A., & Heidemann, J. (2021) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3442381.3450077 · Cited by 109 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…other investigations have further studied algorithmic discrimination, including in other ad delivery settings (Datta et al., 2015; Ali et al., 2019; Imana et al., 2021), mortgage approvals (Martinez & Kirchner, 2021), resume screening (Dastin, 2018), recidivism prediction (Skeem & Lowenkamp,…”
BackgroundAlgorithmic Auditing and Social Justice: Lessons from the History of Audit Studies
Vecchione, B., Levy, K. E. C., & Barocas, S. (2021) · ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization (EAAMO) · doi:10.1145/3465416.3483294 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Creel, K., & Hellman, D. (2022) · Canadian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1017/can.2022.3 · Cited by 67 · cited 2× · see citing works
“As a step in this direction, we focus on measuring the risk of widespread automated discrimination (Corbett-Davies et al., 2017; Kasy & Abebe, 2021; Starke et al., 2022; Creel & Hellman, 2022) via automated language model decisions.”
BackgroundTechnical Aspects of Correspondence Studies
Lahey, J., & Beasley, R. A. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-71153-9_4 · Cited by 65 · cited 1× · see citing works
“External validity has been discussed in both machine learning contexts (Liao et al., 2021; 2022) as well as in audit studies (Lahey & Beasley, 2018).”
BackgroundProxy Non-Discrimination in Data-Driven Systems
Datta, A., Fredrikson, M., Ko, G., Mardziel, P. (., & Sen, S. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1707.08120 · Cited by 63 · cited 1×
“…studied how discrimination can happen directly , based on demographic variables, as well as indirectly though proxies for those variables, such as zip code, extracurricular activities, or other features (VanderWeele & Robinson, 2014; Datta et al., 2017; Kilbertus et al., 2017; Adler et al., 2018).”
BackgroundPicking on the Same Person: Does Algorithmic Monoculture lead to Outcome Homogenization?
Bommasani, R., Creel, K. A., Kumar, A., Jurafsky, D., & Liang, P. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2211.13972 · Cited by 60 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…2015; Ali et al., 2019; Imana et al., 2021), mortgage approvals (Martinez & Kirchner, 2021), resume screening (Dastin, 2018), recidivism prediction (Skeem & Lowenkamp, 2016), hiring (Kirk et al., 2021; Bommasani et al., 2022a; Veldanda et al., 2023), and medical treatment (Obermeyer et al., 2019).”
BackgroundBias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A SurveyPreprint
Gallegos, I. O., Rossi, R. A., Barrow, J., et al. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.00770 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
The Capacity for Moral Self-Correction in Large Language Models
Ganguli, D., Askell, A., Schiefer, N., Liao, T. I., Lukošiūtė, K., Chen, A., Goldie, A., Mirhoseini, A., Olsson, C., Hernandez, D., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.07459 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Self-citationDiscovering Language Model Behaviors with Model-Written Evaluations
Perez, E., Ringer, S., Lukošiūtė, K., Nguyen, K., Chen, E., Heiner, S., Pettit, C., Olsson, C., Kundu, S., Kadavath, S., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2212.09251 · Cited by 53 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Most relevant to our work, Perez et al. (2023) use LMs to generate a wide array of evaluations for an LM in order to uncover concerning behaviors.”
MethodSelf-citationSelf-critiquing models for assisting human evaluators
Saunders, W., Yeh, C., Wu, J., Bills, S., Ouyang, L., Ward, J., & Leike, J. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2206.05802 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Last Name Selection in Audit Studies
Crabtree, C., & Chykina, V. (2018) · Sociological Science · doi:10.15195/v5.a2 · Cited by 47 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Fourth, choosing names in audit studies that are associated with different demographics can be challenging (Gaddis, 2017; Crabtree & Chykina, 2018); while we make a best effort in this study, more work is necessary, as well as an investigation into other sources of proxy discrimination.”
BackgroundVeldanda, A., Grob, F., Thakur, S., Pearce, H., Tan, B., Karri, R., & Garg, S. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.05135 · Cited by 42 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…2015; Ali et al., 2019; Imana et al., 2021), mortgage approvals (Martinez & Kirchner, 2021), resume screening (Dastin, 2018), recidivism prediction (Skeem & Lowenkamp, 2016), hiring (Kirk et al., 2021; Bommasani et al., 2022a; Veldanda et al., 2023), and medical treatment (Obermeyer et al., 2019).”
BackgroundCentering health equity in large language model deployment
Singh, N. P., Lawrence, K. S., Richardson, S. I., & Mann, D. M. (2023) · PLOS Digital Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000367 · Cited by 28 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…may choose to limit the use of language models for such decisions, it remains important to proactively anticipate and mitigate such potential risks as early as possible, especially given that initial deployments in high-stakes settings have already begun (Wodzak, 2022; Singh et al., 2023).”
BackgroundSanchez, M., Alford, K., Krishna, V., Huynh, T. M., Nguyen, C. D. T., Lungren, M. P., Truong, S. Q. H., & Rajpurkar, P. (2023) · Cell Reports Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.101207 · Cited by 13 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Finally, discrimination and other fairness criteria are not the only important factors when deciding whether or not to deploy a model; models must be evaluated in naturalistic settings to ensure they perform satisfactorily at the tasks they are applied to (Raji et al., 2022; Sanchez et al., 2023).”
BackgroundAuditing Ethics: A Cost–Benefit Framework for Audit Studies
Crabtree, C., & Dhima, K. (2021) · Political Studies Review · doi:10.1177/14789299211046153 · Cited by 10 · cited 1×
“…can be resource intensive to execute, making it challenging to conduct a broad study across the wide range of potential applications of language models, and are additionally limited by challenging privacy and ethical constraints of conducting such studies on real people (Crabtree & Dhima, 2022).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
8 of the 71 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Ali, M., Sapiezynski, P., Bogen, M., Korolova, A., Mislove, A., and Rieke, A. Discrimination through optimization: How facebook's ad delivery can lead to biased outcomes. Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction, 3(CSCW):1-30, 2019.
- Bertrand, M. and Mullainathan, S. Are emily and greg more employable than lakisha and jamal? a field experiment on labor market discrimination. American economic review, 94(4):991-1013, 2004.
- Bommasani, R., Hudson, D. A., Adeli, E., Altman, R., Arora, S., von Arx, S., Bernstein, M. S., Bohg, J., Bosse- lut, A., Brunskill, E., Brynjolfsson, E., Buch, S., Card, D., Castellon, R., Chatterji, N., Chen, A., Creel, K., Davis, J. Q., Demszky, D., Donahue, C., Doumbouya, M., Durmus, E., Ermon, S., Etchemendy, J., Ethayarajh, K., Fei-Fei, L., Finn, C., Gale, T., Gillespie, L., Goel, K., Goodman, N., Grossman, S., Guha, N., Hashimoto, T., Henderson, P., Hewitt, J., Ho, D. E., Hong, J., Hsu, K., Huang, J., Icard, T., Jain, S., Jurafsky, D., Kalluri, P., Karamcheti, S., Keeling, G., Khani, F., Khattab, O., Koh, P. W., Krass, M., Krishna, R., Kuditipudi, R., Kumar, A., Ladhak, F., Lee, M., Lee, T., Leskovec, J., Levent, I., Li, X. L., Li, X., Ma, T., Malik, A., Manning, C. D., Mirchan- dani, S., Mitchell, E., Munyikwa, Z., Nair, S., Narayan, A., Narayanan, D., Newman, B., Nie, A., Niebles, J. C., Nilforoshan, H., Nyarko, J., Ogut, G., Orr, L., Papadim- itriou, I., Park, J. S., Piech, C., Portelance, E., Potts, C., Raghunathan, A., Reich, R., Ren, H., Rong, F., Roohani, Y., Ruiz, C., Ryan, J., Ré, C., Sadigh, D., Sagawa, S., San- thanam, K., Shih, A., Srinivasan, K., Tamkin, A., Taori, R., Thomas, A. W., Tramèr, F., Wang, R. E., Wang, W., Wu, B., Wu, J., Wu, Y., Xie, S. M., Yasunaga, M., You, J., Zaharia, M., Zhang, M., Zhang, T., Zhang, X., Zhang, Y., Zheng, L., Zhou, K., and Liang, P. On the opportunities and risks of foundation models, 2022b. Buolamwini, J. and Gebru, T. Gender shades: Intersec- tional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classi- fication. In Conference on fairness, accountability and transparency, pp. 77-91. PMLR, 2018.
- Crenshaw, K. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doc- trine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. In Feminist legal theories, pp. 23-51. Routledge, 2013.
- Kusner, M. J., Loftus, J., Russell, C., and Silva, R. Counter- factual fairness. Advances in neural information process- ing systems, 30, 2017.
- Liao, T., Taori, R., Raji, I. D., and Schmidt, L. Are we learning yet? a meta review of evaluation failures across machine learning. In Thirty-fifth Conference on Neural In- formation Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks Track (Round 2), 2021.
- Metaxa, D., Park, J. S., Robertson, R. E., Karahalios, K., Wilson, C., Hancock, J., Sandvig, C., et al. Auditing algo- rithms: Understanding algorithmic systems from the out- side in. Foundations and Trends® in Human-Computer Interaction, 14(4):272-344, 2021.
- Ransbotham, S., Kiron, D., Gerbert, P., and Reeves, M. Re- shaping business with artificial intelligence: Closing the gap between ambition and action. MIT Sloan Manage- ment Review, 59(1), 2017.
- Skeem, J. L. and Lowenkamp, C. T. Risk, race, and recidi- vism: Predictive bias and disparate impact. Criminology, 54(4):680-712, 2016.
- Starke, C., Baleis, J., Keller, B., and Marcinkowski, F. Fair- ness perceptions of algorithmic decision-making: A sys- tematic review of the empirical literature. Big Data & Society, 9(2):20539517221115189, 2022.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
AI generates covertly racist decisions about people based on their dialect
Hofmann, V., Kalluri, P. R., Jurafsky, D., & King, S. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07856-5 · Cited by 233 · see citing works
Moore, J., Grabb, D., Agnew, W., Klyman, K., Chancellor, S., Ong, D. C., & Haber, N. (2025) · Proceedings of the 2025 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3715275.3732039 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
“She enjoys being with other people and although Maria sometimes argues with her family, Maria has been getting along pretty well with her family.”
Rethinking machine unlearning for large language models
Liu, S., Yao, Y., Jia, J., Casper, S., Baracaldo, N., Hase, P., Yao, Y., Liu, C. Y., Xu, X., Li, H., et al. (2025) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-025-00985-0 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
“LLMs are known to generate biased decisions and outputs (Perez et al., 2022; Tamkin et al., 2023; Cui et al., 2023).”
Assessing and alleviating state anxiety in large language models
Ben‐Zion, Z., Witte, K., Jagadish, A. K., Duek, O. A., Harpaz‐Rotem, I., Khorsandian, M.-C., Burrer, A., Seifritz, E., Homan, P., Schulz, E., et al. (2025) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-025-01512-6 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Kenthapadi, K., Sameki, M., & Taly, A. (2024) · Proceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3637528.3671467 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
“A key challenge in tuning LLMs towards generating grounded responses is that the models may optimize for grounding at the expense of losing creativity and helpfulness.”
Gaebler, J. D., Goel, S., Huq, A., & Tambe, P. (2024) · Behavioral Science & Policy · doi:10.1177/23794607251320229 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
"I'm Sorry, but I Can't Assist": Bias in Generative AI
Smith, J. M. (2024) · Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT) · doi:10.1145/3653666.3656065 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Safetywashing: Do AI Safety Benchmarks Actually Measure Safety Progress?
Ren, R., Basart, S., Khoja, A., Gatti, A., Phan, L., Yin, X., Mazeika, M., Pan, A., Mukobi, G., Kim, R. H., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.21792 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“This correlation means that simply enhancing the upstream general capabilities of models, such as by scaling parameters and increasing training data, often boosts performance across all benchmarks indiscriminately [41, 52].”
The Impact of Generative AI on Labor Market Matching
Kaashoek, J., Raghavan, M., & Horton, J. J. (2024) · doi:10.21428/e4baedd9.d562223c · Cited by 3 · see citing works
AGR: Age Group fairness Reward for Bias Mitigation in LLMs
Cao, S., Cheng, R., & Wang, Z. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp49660.2025.10890657 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“External debiasing methods tackle biases in model predictions during down-stream tasks, using data-centered approaches[5] like GPT-3 encounter greater debiasing challenges due to size and complexity, often addressed through preference alignment [17] and prompt engineering techniques[21].”
An AI‐Enabled Data Processing Pipeline for Ingesting Borehole Data in Peridotite Environments
Aiken, J. M., Dufornet, E., Amiri, H., Ternieten, L., & Plümper, O. (2025) · Journal of Geophysical Research Machine Learning and Computation · doi:10.1029/2025jh000666 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Who Does What? Archetypes of Roles Assigned to LLMs During Human-AI Decision-Making
Chappidi, S., Singh, J. P., & Krauze, A. V. (2026) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3791428 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Consequently, this paper focuses on the use of LLMs in complex decision-making scenarios more likely to reflect real-world implementation and use of LLMs.”
Acceptable Use Policies for Foundation Models
Klyman, K. (2024) · SuperIntelligence - Robotics - Safety & Alignment · doi:10.70777/si.v1i1.10917
- Authors
- Tamkin, A., Askell, A., Lovitt, L., Durmus, E., Joseph, N., Kravec, S., Nguyen, K., Kaplan, J., & Ganguli, D.
- Affiliations
- Anthropic (United States) (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2312.03689
- OpenAlex
- W4389471473
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 71
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Artificial Intelligence in Law
- Keywords
- algorithmic discrimination, language models, automated decision-making, prompt engineering, demographic bias, bias mitigation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review