The DOI matches its DataCite record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Zero-Shot Relation Extraction via Reading Comprehension
Open accessAbstract
We show that relation extraction can be reduced to answering simple reading comprehension questions, by associating one or more natural-language questions with each relation slot. This reduction has several advantages: we can (1) learn relation-extraction models by extending recent neural reading-comprehension techniques, (2) build very large training sets for those models by combining relation-specific crowd-sourced questions with distant supervision, and even (3) do zero-shot learning by extracting new relation types that are only specified at test-time, for which we have no labeled training examples. Experiments on a Wikipedia slot-filling task demonstrate that the approach can generalize to new questions for known relation types with high accuracy, and that zero-shot generalization to unseen relation types is possible, at lower accuracy levels, setting the bar for future work on this task.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“We demonstrate empirically that orthogonalized updates significantly outperform naive sequential editing on standard benchmarks (CounterFact [8], zsRE [9]), particularly as the number of edits scales from 1 to 1000.”
From Subspace Collisions in Knowledge Editing: Orthogonal Low-Rank Updates for Scalable, Stable Model Edits (2026) · cites this paper as [9]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Standard benchmarks for knowledge editing include: • CounterFact [8]: A dataset of counterfactual edits where models must update their predictions for specific facts. • zsRE [9]: A zero-shot relation extraction dataset adapted for knowledge editing evaluation.”
From Subspace Collisions in Knowledge Editing: Orthogonal Low-Rank Updates for Scalable, Stable Model Edits (2026) · cites this paper as [9]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bidirectional Attention Flow for Machine ComprehensionPreprint
Seo, M. J., Kembhavi, A., Farhadi, A., & Hajishirzi, H. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1611.01603 · Cited by 1,698
Self-citationKnowledge-Based Weak Supervision for Information Extraction of Overlapping Relations
Hoffmann, R., Zhang, C., Ling, X., Zettlemoyer, L., & Weld, D. S. (2011) · Cited by 878
Self-citationRepresenting Text for Joint Embedding of Text and Knowledge Bases
Toutanova, K., Chen, D., Pantel, P., Poon, H., Choudhury, P., & Gamon, M. (2015) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d15-1174 · Cited by 827
SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text
Rajpurkar, P., Zhang, J., Lopyrev, K., & Liang, P. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1606.05250 · Cited by 678
Relation Extraction with Matrix Factorization and Universal Schemas
Riedel, S., Yao, L., McCallum, A., & Marlin, B. M. (2013) · ScholarWorks@UMassAmherst (University of Massachusetts Amherst) · Cited by 570
Wikidata: a new platform for collaborative data collection
Vrandečić, D. (2012) · The Web Conference · doi:10.1145/2187980.2188242 · Cited by 528
Large-scale Simple Question Answering with Memory Networks
Bordes, A., Usunier, N., Chopra, S., & Weston, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1506.02075 · Cited by 528
Dynamic Coattention Networks For Question AnsweringPreprint
Xiong, C., Zhong, V., & Socher, R. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1611.01604 · Cited by 504
Injecting Logical Background Knowledge into Embeddings for Relation Extraction
Rocktäschel, T., Singh, S., & Riedel, S. (2015) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.3115/v1/n15-1118 · Cited by 281
Question-Answer Driven Semantic Role Labeling: Using Natural Language to Annotate Natural Language
He, L., Lewis, M., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2015) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d15-1076 · Cited by 197
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Michele Banko, Michael J. Cafarella, Stephen Soderland, Matt Broadhead, and Oren Et- zioni. 2007. Open information extraction from the web. In Proceedings of the 20th Interna- tional Joint Conference on Artifical Intelligence.
- Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Fran- cisco, CA, USA, IJCAI'07, pages 2670-2676. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1625275.1625705. 7 http://nlp.cs.washington.edu/zeroshot
- Thomas Demeester, Tim Rocktäschel, and Sebas- tian Riedel. 2016. Lifted rule injection for re- lation embeddings. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Association for Computa- tional Linguistics, Austin, Texas, pages 1389-1399. https://aclweb.org/anthology/D16-1146.
- Karl Moritz Hermann, Tomáš Kočiský, Edward Grefenstette, Lasse Espeholt, Will Kay, Mustafa Suleyman, and Phil Blunsom. 2015. Teach- ing machines to read and comprehend. In Ad- vances in Neural Information Processing Systems. http://arxiv.org/abs/1506.03340. · arXiv
- Makoto Miwa and Mohit Bansal. 2016. End-to-end re- lation extraction using lstms on sequences and tree structures. In Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meet- ing of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). Association for Compu- tational Linguistics, Berlin, Germany, pages 1105- 1116. http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P16-1105.
- Jeffrey Pennington, Richard Socher, and Christopher Manning. 2014. Glove: Global vectors for word representation. In Proceedings of the 2014 Con- ference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). Association for Computa- tional Linguistics, Doha, Qatar, pages 1532-1543. http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/D14-1162.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 482
Gradient Imitation Reinforcement Learning for Low Resource Relation Extraction
Hu, X., Zhang, C., Yang, Y., Li, X., Li, L., Wen, L., & Yu, P. S. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.216 · Cited by 52
PMET: Precise Model Editing in a Transformer
Li, X., Li, S., Song, S., Yang, J., Ma, J., & Yu, J. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i17.29818 · Cited by 125
Evaluating the Ripple Effects of Knowledge Editing in Language Models
Cohen, R., Biran, E., Yoran, O., Globerson, A., & Geva, M. (2024) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00644 · Cited by 42
Entity-Relation Extraction as Multi-Turn Question AnsweringPreprint
Li, X., Yin, F., Sun, Z., Li, X., Yuan, A., Wang, G., Chai, D., Zhou, M., & Li, J. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.05529 · Cited by 43
SPARTQA: A Textual Question Answering Benchmark for Spatial Reasoning
Mirzaee, R., Faghihi, H. R., Qiang, N., & Kordjamshidi, P. (2021) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.364 · Cited by 66
DocRED: A Large-Scale Document-Level Relation Extraction DatasetPreprint
Yao, Y., Ye, D., Li, P., Han, X., Lin, Y., Liu, Z., Liu, Z., Huang, L., Zhou, J., & Sun, M. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1906.06127 · Cited by 40
A taxonomy and review of generalization research in NLPPreprint
Hupkes, D., Giulianelli, M., Dankers, V., Artetxe, M., Elazar, Y., Pimentel, T., Christodoulopoulos, C., Lasri, K., Saphra, N., Sinclair, A., et al. (2022) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.3929/ethz-b-000638992 · Cited by 41
Learning from Language Description: Low-shot Named Entity Recognition via Decomposed Framework
Wang, Y., Chu, H., Zhang, C., & Gao, J. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-emnlp.139 · Cited by 45
Summarization as Indirect Supervision for Relation Extraction
Lu, K., Hsu, I.-H., Zhou, W., Ma, M. D., & Chen, M. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-emnlp.490 · Cited by 48
Biomedical relation extraction via knowledge-enhanced reading comprehension
Jing, C., Hu, B., Peng, W., Chen, Q., & Tang, B. (2022) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-021-04534-5 · Cited by 39
Let’s Stop Incorrect Comparisons in End-to-end Relation Extraction!
Taillé, B., Guigue, V., Scoutheeten, G., & Gallinari, P. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.301 · Cited by 48
U-Net: Machine Reading Comprehension with Unanswerable QuestionsPreprint
Sun, F., Li, L., Qiu, X., & Liu, Y. (2018) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.06638 · Cited by 49
Question Answering is a Format; When is it Useful?Preprint
Gardner, M., Berant, J., Hajishirzi, H., Talmor, A., & Min, S. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1909.11291 · Cited by 47
Logic-guided Semantic Representation Learning for Zero-Shot Relation Classification
Li, J., Wang, R., Zhang, N., Zhang, W., Yang, F., & Chen, H. (2020) · International Conference on Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.coling-main.265 · Cited by 40
Read before Generate! Faithful Long Form Question Answering with Machine Reading
Su, D., Li, X., Zhang, J., Shang, L., Jiang, X., Liu, Q., & Fung, P. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2022 · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-acl.61 · Cited by 37
Revisiting Few-shot Relation Classification: Evaluation Data and Classification Schemes
Sabo, O., Elazar, Y., Goldberg, Y., & Dagan, I. (2021) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00392 · Cited by 38
I Know There Is No Answer: Modeling Answer Validation for Machine Reading Comprehension
Tan, C., Wei, F., Zhou, Q. S., Yang, N., Lv, W., & Zhou, M. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-99495-6_8 · Cited by 33
Benchmarking Zero-shot Text Classification: Datasets, Evaluation and Entailment ApproachPreprint
Yin, W., Hay, J., & Roth, D. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1909.00161 · Cited by 170
A Unified Generative Retriever for Knowledge-Intensive Language Tasks via Prompt Learning
Chen, J., Zhang, R., Guo, J., de Rijke, M., Liu, Y., Fan, Y., & Cheng, X. (2023) · Proceedings of the 46th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval · doi:10.1145/3539618.3591631 · Cited by 32
Meta-Learning Improves Lifelong Relation Extraction
Obamuyide, A., & Vlachos, A. (2019) · Workshop on Representation Learning for NLP (RepL4NLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/w19-4326 · Cited by 35
Domain-agnostic Question-Answering with Adversarial Training
Lee, S., Kim, D., & Park, J. (2019) · Workshop on Machine Reading for Question Answering (MRQA) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-5826 · Cited by 40
A Question Answering-Based Framework for One-Step Event Argument Extraction
Zhang, Y., Xu, G., Wang, Y., Lin, D., Li, F., Wu, C., Zhang, J., & Huang, T. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2985126 · Cited by 31
QuASE: Question-Answer Driven Sentence Encoding
He, H., Qiang, N., & Roth, D. (2020) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.772 · Cited by 31
Enhanced Language Representation with Label Knowledge for Span Extraction
Yang, P., Cong, X., Sun, Z., & Liu, X. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.379 · Cited by 32
Digital forgetting in large language models: a survey of unlearning methods
Blanco-Justicia, A., Jebreel, N., Manzanares-Salor, B., Sánchez, D., Domingo-Ferrer, J., Collell, G., & Eeik Tan, K. (2025) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-024-11078-6 · Cited by 31
An Exploration of Data Augmentation and Sampling Techniques for Domain-Agnostic Question Answering
Longpre, S., Lu, Y., Tu, Z., & DuBois, C. (2019) · Workshop on Machine Reading for Question Answering (MRQA) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-5829 · Cited by 40
Sun, Q., Huang, K., Yang, X., Tong, R., Zhang, K., & Poria, S. (2024) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3589334.3645678 · Cited by 42
Explainable zero-shot learning via attentive graph convolutional network and knowledge graphs
Geng, Y., Chen, J., Ye, Z., Yuan, Z., Zhang, W., & Chen, H. (2021) · Semantic Web · doi:10.3233/sw-210435 · Cited by 31
Textual Entailment for Event Argument Extraction: Zero- and Few-Shot with Multi-Source Learning
Sainz, O., González-Dios, I., de Lacalle, O. L., Min, B., & Agirre, E. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-naacl.187 · Cited by 31
Raza, S., & Schwartz, B. (2023) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-023-02117-3 · Cited by 35
Raza, S., & Schwartz, B. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-35482-0 · Cited by 32
Li, K., Xian, X., Wang, J., & Yu, N. (2018) · Applied Surface Science · doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.11.214 · Cited by 30
EntQA: Entity Linking as Question AnsweringPreprint
Zhang, W., Hua, W., & Stratos, K. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.02369 · Cited by 40
Clinical concept and relation extraction using prompt-based machine reading comprehension
Cheng, P., Yang, X., Yu, Z., Bian, J., Hogan, W. R., & Wu, Y. (2023) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocad107 · Cited by 37
Learning Representation Mapping for Relation Detection in Knowledge Base Question Answering
Wu, P., Huang, S., Weng, R., Zheng, Z., Zhang, J., Yan, X., & Chen, J. (2019) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1616 · Cited by 28
Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Relation Extraction without Supervision
Papanikolaou, Y., Roberts, I., & Pierleoni, A. (2019) · Workshop on Deep Learning Approaches for Low-Resource NLP (DeepLo) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-6108 · Cited by 31
A pattern-first pipeline approach for entity and relation extraction
Chen, Z., & Guo, C. (2022) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2022.04.059 · Cited by 27
Unified Semantic Typing with Meaningful Label Inference
Huang, J. Y., Li, B., Xu, J., & Chen, M. (2022) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.190 · Cited by 28
A Survey of Knowledge Enhanced Pre-trained ModelsPreprint
Yang, J., Xiao, G., Shen, Y.-L., Jiang, W., Hu, X., Zhang, Y., & Peng, J. (2021) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.00269 · Cited by 64
Zhang, C., Lei, X., Xia, Y., & Sun, L. (2024) · Developments in the Built Environment · doi:10.1016/j.dibe.2024.100549 · Cited by 29
Think Before You Speak: Explicitly Generating Implicit Commonsense Knowledge for Response Generation
Zhou, P., Gopalakrishnan, K., Hedayatnia, B., Kim, S., Pujara, J., Ren, X., Liu, Y., & Hakkani-Tür, D. Z. (2022) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.88 · Cited by 26
RE-Matching: A Fine-Grained Semantic Matching Method for Zero-Shot Relation Extraction
Zhao, J., Zhan, W., Zhao, X., Zhang, Q., Gui, T., Wei, Z., Wang, J., Peng, M., & Sun, M. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.369 · Cited by 30
Logiqa 2.0—An improved dataset for logical reasoning in natural language understanding
Liu, H., Liu, J., Cui, L., Teng, Z., Duan, N., Zhou, M., & Zhang, Y. (2023) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2023.3293046 · Cited by 26
Panchendrarajan, R., & Zubiaga, A. (2024) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124097 · Cited by 29
Unifying Question Answering, Text Classification, and Regression via Span ExtractionPreprint
Keskar, N. S., McCann, B., Xiong, C., & Socher, R. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1904.09286 · Cited by 50
MELO: Enhancing Model Editing with Neuron-Indexed Dynamic LoRA
Yu, L., Chen, Q., Zhou, J., & He, L. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i17.29916 · Cited by 51
Shafikuzzaman, M., Islam, M. R., Rolli, A. C., Akhter, S., & Seliya, N. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3439450 · Cited by 29
Weikum, G. (2021) · Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment · doi:10.14778/3476311.3476393 · Cited by 25
Asking It All: Generating Contextualized Questions for any Semantic Role
Pyatkin, V., Roit, P., Michael, J., Goldberg, Y., Tsarfaty, R., & Dagan, I. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.108 · Cited by 28
What Can Knowledge Bring to Machine Learning?—A Survey of Low-shot Learning for Structured Data
Hu, Y., Chapman, A. P., Wen, G., & Hall, D. W. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3510030 · Cited by 28
Pre-training to Match for Unified Low-shot Relation Extraction
Liu, F., Lin, H., Han, X., Cao, B., & Sun, L. (2022) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.397 · Cited by 26
Tree-KGQA: An Unsupervised Approach for Question Answering Over Knowledge Graphs
Rony, M. R. A. H., Chaudhuri, D., Usbeck, R., & Lehmann, J. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3173355 · Cited by 27
Fusing external knowledge resources for natural language understanding techniques: A survey
Wang, Y., Wang, W., Chen, Q., Huang, K., Nguyen, A., De, S., & Hussain, A. (2022) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2022.11.025 · Cited by 23
Methods for Measuring, Updating, and Visualizing Factual Beliefs in Language Models
Hase, P., Diab, M., Çelikyılmaz, A., Li, X., Kozareva, Z., Stoyanov, V., Bansal, M., & Iyer, S. V. (2023) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.eacl-main.199 · Cited by 32
"A Passage to India": Pre-trained Word Embeddings for Indian LanguagesPreprint
Kumar, S., Saunack, K., Kanojia, D., & Bhattacharyya, P. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2112.13800 · Cited by 29
Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Representation Learning for NLP (RepL4NLP-2019)
Augenstein, I., Gella, S., Ruder, S., Kann, K., Can, B., Conneau, A., Welbl, J., Ren, X., & Rei, M. (2019) · doi:10.18653/v1/w19-43 · Cited by 24
Kaushik, D., Kiela, D., Lipton, Z. C., & Yih, W.-T. (2021) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.517 · Cited by 30
Question Answering Infused Pre-training of General-Purpose Contextualized Representations
Jia, R., Lewis, M., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-acl.59 · Cited by 29
Self-citationBaradaran, R., & Amirkhani, H. (2021) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2021.08.095 · Cited by 25
Robust Retrieval Augmented Generation for Zero-shot Slot Filling
Glass, M., Rossiello, G., Chowdhury, M. F. M., & Gliozzo, A. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.148 · Cited by 25
RCL: Relation Contrastive Learning for Zero-Shot Relation Extraction
Wang, S., Zhang, B., Xu, Y., Wu, Y., & Xiao, B. J. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-naacl.188 · Cited by 25
Can NLI Provide Proper Indirect Supervision for Low-resource Biomedical Relation Extraction?
Xu, J., Ma, M. D., & Chen, M. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.138 · Cited by 27
Exposing Shallow Heuristics of Relation Extraction Models with Challenge Data
Rosenman, S., Jacovi, A., & Goldberg, Y. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.302 · Cited by 26
A Unified Multi-Task Learning Framework for Joint Extraction of Entities and Relations
Zhao, T., Yan, Z., Cao, Y., & Li, Z. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i16.17707 · Cited by 24
Contextualized Representations Using Textual Encyclopedic KnowledgePreprint
Joshi, M., Lee, K., Luan, Y., & Toutanova, K. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.12006 · Cited by 31
Halterman, A., Keith, K. A., Sarwar, S. M., & O’Connor, B. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-acl.371 · Cited by 20
Frustratingly Simple Few-Shot Slot Tagging
Ma, J., Yan, Z., Li, C., & Zhang, Y. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-acl.88 · Cited by 20
Improving Pretrained Language Model Fine-Tuning With Noise Stability Regularization
Hua, H., Li, X., Dou, D., Xu, C., & Luo, J. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2023.3330926 · Cited by 24
Salemi, A., & Zamani, H. (2024) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/3626772.3657733 · Cited by 35
CHARM: Inferring Personal Attributes from Conversations
Tigunova, A., Yates, A., Mirza, P., & Weikum, G. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.434 · Cited by 18
Hindsight: Posterior-guided training of retrievers for improved open-ended generationPreprint
Paranjape, A., Khattab, O., Potts, C., Zaharia, M., & Manning, C. D. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.07752 · Cited by 30
Single-dataset Experts for Multi-dataset Question Answering
Friedman, D., Dodge, B., & Chen, D. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.495 · Cited by 22
Document-level event argument linking as machine reading comprehension
Liu, J., Chen, Y., & Xu, J. (2022) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2022.03.016 · Cited by 18
Li, S., & Xu, J. (2023) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103467 · Cited by 18
Open-world story generation with structured knowledge enhancement: A comprehensive survey
Wang, Y., Lin, J., Yu, Z., Hu, W. P., & Karlsson, B. F. (2023) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2023.126792 · Cited by 21
CorpusLM: Towards a Unified Language Model on Corpus for Knowledge-Intensive Tasks
Li, X., Dou, Z., Zhou, Y., & Liu, F. (2024) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/3626772.3657778 · Cited by 24
QA4IE: A Question Answering Based Framework for Information Extraction
Qiu, L., Zhou, H., Qu, Y., Zhang, W., Li, S., Rong, S., Ru, D., Qian, L., Tu, K., & Yu, Y. H. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-00671-6_12 · Cited by 20
A Knowledge-Enhanced Pretraining Model for Commonsense Story GenerationPreprint
Guan, J., Huang, F., Zhao, Z., Zhu, X., & Huang, M. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2001.05139 · Cited by 18
Yu, G., Li, J., Luo, L., Meng, Y., Ao, X., & He, Q. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-emnlp.115 · Cited by 17
Mariotti, L., Guidetti, V., Mandreoli, F., Belli, A., & Lombardi, P. (2024) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2024.1460065 · Cited by 21
Coreference Resolution as Query-based Span PredictionPreprint
Wu, W., Wang, F., Yuan, A., Wu, F. Q., & Li, J. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1911.01746 · Cited by 17
A survey on cutting-edge relation extraction techniques based on language models
Diaz-Garcia, J. A., & Amador, J. (2025) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-025-11280-0 · Cited by 32
Xie, B., Jia, X., Song, X., Zhang, H., Chen, B. Y., Jiang, B., Wang, Y., & Pan, Y. (2023) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2023.03.016 · Cited by 16
UTC-IE: A Unified Token-pair Classification Architecture for Information Extraction
Yan, H. R., Sun, Y., Li, X., Zhou, Y., Huang, X., & Qiu, X. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.226 · Cited by 19
RuBQ: A Russian Dataset for Question Answering over Wikidata
Korablinov, V., & Braslavski, P. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-62466-8_7 · Cited by 23
Robust Reading Comprehension With Linguistic Constraints via Posterior Regularization
Zhou, M., Huang, M., & Zhu, X. (2020) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2020.3016132 · Cited by 16
Benchmarking knowledge-driven zero-shot learning
Geng, Y., Chen, J., Zhuang, X., Chen, Z., Pan, J. Z., Li, J., Yuan, Z., & Chen, H. (2022) · Journal of Web Semantics · doi:10.1016/j.websem.2022.100757 · Cited by 21
A Flexible Framework for Relation Extraction in Multiple Domains
Chauhan, G. (2019) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · Cited by 15
Probing and Fine-tuning Reading Comprehension Models for Few-shot Event ExtractionPreprint
Feng, R., Yuan, J., & Zhang, C. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.11325 · Cited by 22
Improving Discriminative Learning for Zero-Shot Relation Extraction
Tran, V.-H., Ouchi, H., Watanabe, T., & Matsumoto, Y. (2022) · SPANLP · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.spanlp-1.1 · Cited by 15
Out-of-Distribution Generalization in Natural Language Processing: Past, Present, and Future
Yang, L., Song, Y., Ren, X., Lyu, C., Wang, Y., Zhuo, J., Liu, L., Wang, J., Foster, J., & Zhang, Y. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.276 · Cited by 21
ReCO: A Large Scale Chinese Reading Comprehension Dataset on Opinion
Wang, B., Yao, T., Zhang, Q., Xu, J., & Wang, X. (2020) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v34i05.6450 · Cited by 15
Probing Prior Knowledge Needed in Challenging Chinese Machine Reading Comprehension.Preprint
Sun, K., Yu, D., Yu, D., & Cardie, C. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 15
Retrieval Augmented Generation with Rich Answer Encoding
Huang, W., Lapata, M., Vougiouklis, P., Papasarantopoulos, N., & Pan, J. Z. (2023) · International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing and Conference of the Asia-Pacific Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (IJCNLP-AACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.ijcnlp-main.65 · Cited by 19
Fine-grained spatial information extraction in radiology as two-turn question answering
Datta, S., & Roberts, K. E. (2021) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104628 · Cited by 15
Learning to Generate Task-Specific Adapters from Task Description
Ye, Q., & Ren, X. (2021) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-short.82 · Cited by 26
ATOM: Commit Message Generation Based on Abstract Syntax Tree and Hybrid RankingPreprint
Liu, S., Gao, C., Chen, S., Nie, L. Y., & Liu, Y. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1912.02972 · Cited by 14
Do We Know What We Don’t Know? Studying Unanswerable Questions beyond SQuAD 2.0
Sulem, E., Hay, J., & Roth, D. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-emnlp.385 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Levy, O., Seo, M., Choi, E., & Zettlemoyer, L.
- Affiliations
- Bar-Ilan University (IL)
- University of Washington (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2017
- Pages
- 333-342
- arXiv
- 1706.04115
- OpenAlex
- W2624677889
- Cited by
- 482
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 84 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 21
- FWCI
- 17.59
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1252835, 1562364)
- Nvidia
- Tencent
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (FA8750-13-2-0019, FA8750)
- Army Research Office (W911NF-16-1-, W911NF)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Keywords
- zero-shot relation extraction, reading comprehension, natural language queries, distant supervision, zero-shot learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review