The DOI matches its DataCite record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A multi-agent reinforcement learning model of common-pool resource appropriation
Open accessAbstract
Humanity faces numerous problems of common-pool resource appropriation. This class of multi-agent social dilemma includes the problems of ensuring sustainable use of fresh water, common fisheries, grazing pastures, and irrigation systems. Abstract models of common-pool resource appropriation based on non-cooperative game theory predict that self-interested agents will generally fail to find socially positive equilibria---a phenomenon called the tragedy of the commons. However, in reality, human societies are sometimes able to discover and implement stable cooperative solutions. Decades of behavioral game theory research have sought to uncover aspects of human behavior that make this possible. Most of that work was based on laboratory experiments where participants only make a single choice: how much to appropriate. Recognizing the importance of spatial and temporal resource dynamics, a recent trend has been toward experiments in more complex real-time video game-like environments. However, standard methods of non-cooperative game theory can no longer be used to generate predictions for this case. Here we show that deep reinforcement learning can be used instead. To that end, we study the emergent behavior of groups of independently learning agents in a partially observed Markov game modeling common-pool resource appropriation. Our experiments highlight the importance of trial-and-error learning in common-pool resource appropriation and shed light on the relationship between exclusion, sustainability, and inequality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Recent advents in deep reinforcement learning (DRL) and neuroevolution have enabled the study of complex behaviors in simulations, such as foraging and tool-use (Pérolat et al., 2017;Hamon et al., 2023;Baker et al., 2020).”
From Dynamics of niche construction in adaptable populations evolving in diverse environments (2023) · cites this paper as Pérolat et al., 2017
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning
Mnih, V., Kavukcuoglu, K., Silver, D., Rusu, A. A., Veness, J., Bellemare, M. G., Graves, A., Riedmiller, M., Fidjeland, A. K., Ostrovski, G., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14236 · Cited by 30,357
Self-citationHardin, G. (1968) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.162.3859.1243 · Cited by 25,167
Axelrod, R., & Hamilton, W. D. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7466396 · Cited by 20,065
Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action
Field, B. C., & Elinor Ostrom, B. (1992) · Land Economics · doi:10.2307/3146384 · Cited by 19,100
The economic theory of a common-property resource: The fishery
Gordon, H. S. (1954) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/257497 · Cited by 4,248
The Struggle to Govern the Commons
Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P. C. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1091015 · Cited by 4,209
Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resources
Elinor Ostrom, B., Gardner, R., & Walker, J. (1994) · University of Michigan Press eBooks · doi:10.3998/mpub.9739 · Cited by 3,869
Revisiting the commons: local lessons, global challenges.
Ostrom, E., Burger, J., Field, C. B., Norgaard, R. B., & Policansky, D. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.284.5412.278 · Cited by 2,798
Markov games as a framework for multi-agent reinforcement learning
Littman, M. L. (1994) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-1-55860-335-6.50027-1 · Cited by 2,789
Shapley, L. S. (1953) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.39.10.1095 · Cited by 2,549
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- [9][9] Piotr J Gmytrasiewicz and Prashant Doshi. A framework for sequential planning in multi-agent settings. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research , 24:49-79, 2005. -
- [12][12] Garrett Hardin. The tragedy of the commons. Science , 162(3859):1243-1248, 1968. -
- [16][16] Marco Janssen, Robert Goldstone, Filippo Menczer, and Elinor Ostrom. Effect of rule choice in dynamic interactive spatial commons. International Journal of the Commons , 2(2), 2008. -
- [20][20] Guillaume J. Laurent, Laëtitia Matignon, and N. Le Fort-Piat. The world of independent learners is not Markovian. Int. J. Know.-Based Intell. Eng. Syst. , 15(1):55-64, 2011. -
- [21][21] Joel Z. Leibo, Vinicius Zambaldi, Marc Lanctot, Janusz Marecki, and Thore Graepel. Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning in Sequential Social Dilemmas. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AA-MAS 2017) , Sao Paulo, Brazil, 2017. -
- [23][23] Kent O Martin. Play by the rules or don't play at all: Space division and resource allocation in a rural newfoundland fishing community. North Atlantic maritime cultures , pages 277-98, 1979. -
- [30][30] Vincent Ostrom and Elinor Ostrom. Public goods and public choices. In Alternatives for Delivering Public Services: Toward Improved Performance , pages 7-49. Westview press, 1977. -
- [36][36] Rachel A Turner, Tim Gray, Nicholas VC Polunin, and Selina M Stead. Territoriality as a driver of fishers' spatial behavior in the northumberland lobster fishery. Society & Natural Resources , 26(5):491-505, 2013. -
- [37][37] Pradeep Varakantham, Jun-young Kwak, Matthew E Taylor, Janusz Marecki, Paul Scerri, and Milind Tambe. Exploiting coordination locales in distributed POMDPs via social model shaping. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, ICAPS , 2009. -
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nguyen, T. T., Nguyen, N. D., & Nahavandi, S. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2020.2977374 · Cited by 1,306
Multi-agent deep reinforcement learning: a survey
Gronauer, S., & Diepold, K. (2022) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-021-09996-w · Cited by 957
Deep Reinforcement Learning: An Overview
Li, Y. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1701.07274 · Cited by 762
Emergent Tool Use From Multi-Agent Autocurricula
Baker, B., Kanitscheider, I., Markov, T., Wu, Y., Powell, G., McGrew, B., & Mordatch, I. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1909.07528 · Cited by 424
“Many stages of emergent strategy can be mapped to behavioral shifts in the way agents interact with the tools in their environment, similar to [61, 62].”
BackgroundDu, W., & Ding, S. (2020) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-020-09938-y · Cited by 295
Metadata
- Authors
- Perolat, J., Leibo, J. Z., Zambaldi, V., Beattie, C., Tuyls, K., & Graepel, T.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2017
- Volume
- 30
- Pages
- 3643-3652
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1707.06600
- OpenAlex
- W2739364177
- Cited by
- 109
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 3
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- neural information processing systems
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Game Theory and Applications
- Keywords
- common-pool resources, tragedy of the commons, multi-agent reinforcement learning, deep reinforcement learning, partially observable Markov games, social dilemmas, emergence of cooperation, trial-and-error learning, sustainability, inequality, exclusion, video game environments, behavioral game theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
