The DOI matches its DataCite record; 55 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 16 of the 26 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
SimplE Embedding for Link Prediction in Knowledge Graphs
Open accessAbstract
Knowledge graphs contain knowledge about the world and provide a structured representation of this knowledge. Current knowledge graphs contain only a small subset of what is true in the world. Link prediction approaches aim at predicting new links for a knowledge graph given the existing links among the entities. Tensor factorization approaches have proved promising for such link prediction problems. Proposed in 1927, Canonical Polyadic (CP) decomposition is among the first tensor factorization approaches. CP generally performs poorly for link prediction as it learns two independent embedding vectors for each entity, whereas they are really tied. We present a simple enhancement of CP (which we call SimplE) to allow the two embeddings of each entity to be learned dependently. The complexity of SimplE grows linearly with the size of embeddings. The embeddings learned through SimplE are interpretable, and certain types of background knowledge can be incorporated into these embeddings through weight tying. We prove SimplE is fully expressive and derive a bound on the size of its embeddings for full expressivity. We show empirically that, despite its simplicity, SimplE outperforms several state-of-the-art tensor factorization techniques. SimplE's code is available on GitHub at https://github.com/Mehran-k/SimplE.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
SimplE is a simple bilinear tensor-factorization model for knowledge graph link prediction that ties the two CP embeddings of each entity via inverse relations, making them learned dependently while retaining linear complexity. It is proved fully expressive and empirically matches or outperforms ComplEx and other baselines on WN18 and FB15k, with large gains when background-knowledge rules are incorporated by weight tying.
Key findings
- SimplE is fully expressive: Proposition 1 gives an embedding size of min(|E|·|R|, γ+1) for any ground truth with γ true facts; it addresses CP’s independent head/tail embeddings by averaging CP scores for (e_i, r, e_j) and (e_j, r^{-1}, e_i).
- On WN18, SimplE achieves filtered MRR 0.942, raw MRR 0.588, and Hit@1/3/10 0.939/0.944/0.947; on FB15k, filtered MRR 0.727, raw MRR 0.239, and Hit@1/3/10 0.660/0.773/0.838. It outperforms ComplEx on FB15k filtered MRR (0.727 vs. 0.692) and is comparable on WN18 (0.942 vs. 0.941).
- Background knowledge via weight tying: after removing redundant WN18 training triples (approximately 141K to 90K, about 36% reduction), filtered MRR was 0.221 for SimplE-ignr, 0.384 for SimplE, and 0.275 for ComplEx without rules; with tied rules, SimplE-ignr-bk reached 0.772 and SimplE-bk 0.776.
- Complexity: SimplE and SimplE-ignr are O(d); per triple, SimplE-ignr uses 1 multiplication between three vectors, SimplE uses 2, and ComplEx uses 4, reducing computations by factors of 4 and 2 versus ComplEx. FSTransE is shown not fully expressive with restrictions R1–R3.
Methods
- Model: tensor factorization based on CP; each entity has head h_e and tail t_e vectors, each relation has v_r and v_{r^{-1}}; score for (e_i, r, e_j) is 1/2(〈h_ei, v_r, t_ej〉 + 〈h_ej, v_{r^{-1}}, t_ei〉). SimplE-ignr updates both scores during training but tests only 〈h_ei, v_r, t_ej〉.
- Training/evaluation: SGD with minibatches, negative sampling by corrupting head or tail (Bordes et al. procedure), and L2-regularized negative log-likelihood with softplus. Datasets: WN18 (40,943 entities, 18 relations, 141,442 train, 5,000 validation, 5,000 test triples) and FB15k (14,951 entities, 1,345 relations, 483,142 train, 50,000 validation, 59,071 test triples). Metrics: filtered/raw MRR and Hit@k; baselines include CP, TransE, TransR, DistMult, NTN, STransE, ER-MLP, and ComplEx.
- Hyperparameters: TensorFlow implementation; embedding size 200; max iterations 1000; batch size 100; learning rate 0.1 for WN18 and 0.05 for FB15k; adagrad; 1 negative per positive for WN18 and 10 for FB15k. Best λ values: SimplE-ignr WN18 0.001, FB15k 0.03; SimplE WN18 0.03, FB15k 0.1.
Limitations
- The paper does not have a dedicated limitations section; it lists future improvements (ensembles, 1-N scoring, combining with logic, incorporating other background knowledge) and notes that the background-knowledge experiment provides an upper bound on how much such knowledge can improve SimplE.
- Evident from the text: empirical evaluation is limited to WN18 and FB15k, and the background-knowledge experiment is only on WN18 after removing redundant triples, so those gains may not generalize.
- Evident from the text: no variance, confidence intervals, or significance tests are reported; hyperparameters were tuned on validation sets, and results appear to be single runs as described.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
16 of 26 cited sources checked · 12 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“It has been shown in [40] that ComplEx is fully expressive with embeddings of length at most |E| · |R| .”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [40] [40] Théo Trouillon, Christopher R Dance, Johannes Welbl, Sebastian Riedel, Éric Gaussier, and Guillaume Bouchard. Knowledge graph completion via complex tensor factorization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.06879 , 2017. - source
Section 3.2 (p. 14), Theorem 4, shows that the ComplEx factorization exists for any set of relation matrices using dimension at most nm. The paper identifies n as the number of entities and m as the number of relations, giving the claimed |E|·|R| bound. (LLM, conf=0.94)
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“As described in [3], to scale to the size of the current KGs and keep up with their growth, a relational model must have a linear time and memory complexity.”
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [3] [3] Antoine Bordes, Nicolas Usunier, Alberto Garcia-Duran, Jason Weston, and Oksana Yakhnenko. Irreflexive and hierarchical relations as translations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1304.7158 , 2013. - sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction (p. 1) describes the large size of knowledge bases, and Related work (p. 2) discusses which models scale to many entities and relation types. Neither passage says that linear time and memory complexity is necessary to scale or keep up with growth. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Corollary 1. Other variants of translational approaches such as TransE, FTransE, STransE, TransH [41], and TransR [22] also have the restrictions mentioned in Proposition 2.”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [41] [41] Zhen Wang, Jianwen Zhang, Jianlin Feng, and Zheng Chen. Knowledge graph embedding by translating on hyperplanes. In AAAI , pages 1112-1119, 2014. - source
The citation [41] is attached specifically to TransH in the list of translational approaches. The ‘Translating on Hyperplanes (TransH)’ section (p. 3) introduces and names that model, so the paper supports this identification citation; it need not establish the citing authors’ Corollary 1. (LLM, conf=0.94)
- Partly supportedcites [22] [22] Yankai Lin, Zhiyuan Liu, Maosong Sun, Yang Liu, and Xuan Zhu. Learning entity and relation embeddings for knowledge graph completion. In AAAI , pages 2181-2187, 2015. - sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The TransR section (p. 3) identifies TransR as a translational model, and the Cluster-based TransR section (p. 3) says it shares a limitation with TransE and TransH: one relation vector may not fit diverse entity pairs. Our copy does not identify the restrictions in the citing paper’s Proposition 2, so it cannot establish that TransR has those specific restrictions. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Rests on an assumption: For a triple (h,r,t) to hold in FSTransE, we should ideally have p_rh + v_r = α q_rt for some α.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“We prove that many existing translational approaches (see e.g., [4, 17, 41, 26]) are not fully expressive and we identify severe restrictions on what they can represent.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [4] [4] Antoine Bordes, Nicolas Usunier, Alberto Garcia-Duran, Jason Weston, and Oksana Yakhnenko. Translating embeddings for modeling multi-relational data. In NIPS , pages 2787-2795, 2013. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [17] [17] Guoliang Ji, Shizhu He, Liheng Xu, Kang Liu, and Jun Zhao. Knowledge graph embedding via dynamic mapping matrix. In ACL (1) , pages 687-696, 2015. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Partly supportedcites [41] [41] Zhen Wang, Jianwen Zhang, Jianlin Feng, and Zheng Chen. Knowledge graph embedding by translating on hyperplanes. In AAAI , pages 1112-1119, 2014. - sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The section “Relations’ Mapping Properties in Embedding” (p. 2) identifies representational restrictions of TransE for reflexive and one-to-many/many-to-one relations. This supports the general concern about limited expressiveness, but the cited paper analyzes TransE specifically; it does not establish that many translational approaches are not fully expressive. (LLM, conf=0.85)
- Not matchedcites [26] [26] Dat Quoc Nguyen, Kairit Sirts, Lizhen Qu, and Mark Johnson. Stranse: a novel embedding model of entities and relationships in knowledge bases. In NAACL-HLT , 2016. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Not matched
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Wang et al. [44] prove that TransE is not fully expressive.”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [44] [44] Yanjie Wang, Rainer Gemulla, and Hui Li. On multi-relational link prediction with bilinear models. AAAI , 2018. - source
Section 3.3 (p. 4) states and proves that some Boolean tensors cannot be represented by any consistent TransE ranking. Section 3.1 (p. 3) also proves that some RESCAL models cannot be expressed by TransE, regardless of its size. These results support the claim that TransE is not fully expressive. (LLM, conf=0.94)
Load-bearingStrength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“While inverse of relations has been used for other purposes (see e.g., [20, 21, 6]), using them to address the independence of the entity vectors in CP is a novel contribution.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [20] [20] Ni Lao and William W Cohen. Relational retrieval using a combination of path-constrained random walks. Machine learning , 81(1):53-67, 2010. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Supportedcites [21] [21] Yankai Lin, Zhiyuan Liu, Huanbo Luan, Maosong Sun, Siwei Rao, and Song Liu. Modeling relation paths for representation learning of knowledge bases. EMNLP , 2015. - source
The citation supports the sentence’s background clause: inverse relations had been used for other purposes. In §2.5, “Reverse Relation Addition,” the paper adds reverse relations so its model can use relation paths that would otherwise run against a relation’s direction. The sentence’s claim of novelty in CP is the citing authors’ own contribution, not a claim attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.92)
- Not matchedcites [6] [6] Rajarshi Das, Shehzaad Dhuliawala, Manzil Zaheer, Luke Vilnis, Ishan Durugkar, Akshay Krishnamurthy, Alex Smola, and Andrew McCallum. Go for a walk and arrive at the answer: Reasoning over paths in knowledge bases using reinforcement learning. NIPS Workshop on AKBC , 2017. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Not matched
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“CP generally performs poorly for link prediction as it learns two independent embedding vectors for each entity, whereas they are really tied.”
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
“This independence has caused CP to perform poorly for KG completion [40].”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [40] [40] Théo Trouillon, Christopher R Dance, Johannes Welbl, Sebastian Riedel, Éric Gaussier, and Guillaume Bouchard. Knowledge graph completion via complex tensor factorization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.06879 , 2017. - source
The Introduction (p. 2) says CP gives each entity two different embeddings and consequently has low prediction performance. The Results (p. 24) report that CP lags on both link-prediction benchmarks; the paper also notes an exception on fully observed data sets (p. 20), consistent with the claim’s 'generally' qualifier. (LLM, conf=0.93)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“We also show that the function used in ComplEx [39, 40], a state-of-the-art approach for link prediction, involves redundant computations.”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [39] [39] Théo Trouillon, Johannes Welbl, Sebastian Riedel, Éric Gaussier, and Guillaume Bouchard. Complex embeddings for simple link prediction. In ICML , pages 2071-2080, 2016. - source
The citation identifies ComplEx, not the citing authors’ own finding about redundant computations. Section 4 (p. 5) names the model ComplEx, and Section 4.3 (p. 6) reports its strong link-prediction results against the compared models. (LLM, conf=0.91)
- Supportedcites [40] [40] Théo Trouillon, Christopher R Dance, Johannes Welbl, Sebastian Riedel, Éric Gaussier, and Guillaume Bouchard. Knowledge graph completion via complex tensor factorization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.06879 , 2017. - source
The citation identifies ComplEx and its scoring function, which the cited paper defines in Section 3.1 (p. 12). The statement that the function involves redundant computations is introduced as something the citing authors show, not as a finding attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.89)
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Supported
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“R3 : If entity e 1 has relation r with every entity in ∆ ⊂ E and entity e 2 has relation r with one of the entities in ∆ , then e 2 must have the relation r with every entity in ∆ .”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Rests on an assumption: For a triple (h,r,t) to hold in FSTransE, we should ideally have p_rh + v_r = α q_rt for some α.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Proposition 4. Let r be a relation such that for any two entities e i and e j we have ( e i , r , e j ) ∈ ζ ⇐⇒ ( e j , r , e i ) ∈ ζ ′ (i.e. r is anti-symmetric). This property of r can be encoded into SimplE by tying the parameters v r -1 to the negative of v r .”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes
- Probably not a substantial claim. 21
- It may state two separate claims as one. 18
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Since DistMult does not distinguish between head and tail entities, it can only model symmetric relations.”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [46] [46] Bishan Yang, Wen-tau Yih, Xiaodong He, Jianfeng Gao, and Li Deng. Embedding entities and relations for learning and inference in knowledge bases. ICLR , 2015. - source
Section 4.1 (p. 5) identifies DistMult as BILINEAR-DIAG and describes its score as a weighted element-wise dot product of the two entity vectors. Section 3.2 (p. 4) specifies a diagonal relation matrix. Swapping the head and tail leaves that score unchanged, so the model cannot distinguish a relation from its reverse. (LLM, conf=0.92)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Tensor factorization approaches have proved to be an effective SRL approach for KG completion [29, 4, 39, 26].”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [29] [29] Maximilian Nickel, Volker Tresp, and Hans-Peter Kriegel. Factorizing yago: scalable machine learning for linked data. In World Wide Web , pages 271-280. ACM, 2012. - source
- Not matchedcites [4] [4] Antoine Bordes, Nicolas Usunier, Alberto Garcia-Duran, Jason Weston, and Oksana Yakhnenko. Translating embeddings for modeling multi-relational data. In NIPS , pages 2787-2795, 2013. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Supportedcites [39] [39] Théo Trouillon, Johannes Welbl, Sebastian Riedel, Éric Gaussier, and Guillaume Bouchard. Complex embeddings for simple link prediction. In ICML , pages 2071-2080, 2016. - source
The Introduction (p. 1) describes low-rank tensor completion as an increasingly popular approach to knowledge-graph link prediction, a task it identifies as part of statistical relational learning. The Abstract (p. 1) and Conclusion (p. 8) report that the paper’s factorization approach outperforms alternatives on standard link-prediction benchmarks, supporting the claim of effectiveness. (LLM, conf=0.91)
- Not matchedcites [26] [26] Dat Quoc Nguyen, Kairit Sirts, Lizhen Qu, and Mark Johnson. Stranse: a novel embedding model of entities and relationships in knowledge bases. In NAACL-HLT , 2016. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Viewing SimplE as a single-vector-per-entity model makes it easily integrable (or compatible) with other embedding models (in knowledge graph completion, computer vision and natural language processing) such as [35, 47, 36].”
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [35] [35] Adam Santoro, David Raposo, David G Barrett, Mateusz Malinowski, Razvan Pascanu, Peter Battaglia, and Tim Lillicrap. A simple neural network module for relational reasoning. In NIPS , 2017. - sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Visual question answering section (p. 10) says the paper’s Relation Network module can readily be combined with CNNs and LSTMs, supporting the citation as an example of an integrable model used with vision and language inputs. It does not discuss SimplE, single-vector-per-entity representations, or compatibility with knowledge-graph-completion embedding models. (LLM, conf=0.83)
- Supportedcites [47] [47] Hanwang Zhang, Zawlin Kyaw, Shih-Fu Chang, and Tat-Seng Chua. Visual translation embedding network for visual relation detection. In CVPR , volume 1, page 5, 2017. source
The citation identifies an embedding model in computer vision, rather than attributing the claim about SimplE’s ease of integration to this paper. Section 3.1, “Visual Translation Embedding,” describes VTransE as a model that maps visual object features into a relation embedding space. (LLM, conf=0.91)
- Supportedcites [36] [36] Michael Schlichtkrull, Thomas N Kipf, Peter Bloem, Rianne van den Berg, Ivan Titov, and Max Welling. Modeling relational data with graph convolutional networks. In European Semantic Web Conference , pages 593-607. Springer, 2018. - source
The citation appears in a list of examples of other embedding models, rather than as evidence for the citing authors’ conclusion about SimplE’s compatibility. The paper’s link-prediction model uses an R-GCN to produce latent entity representations for knowledge-base completion (model description, p. 1), so it fits the knowledge-graph example. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Given that we use the same data splits and objective function as ComplEx, we report the results of CP, TransE, DistMult, and ComplEx from [39].”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [39] [39] Théo Trouillon, Johannes Welbl, Sebastian Riedel, Éric Gaussier, and Guillaume Bouchard. Complex embeddings for simple link prediction. In ICML , pages 2071-2080, 2016. - source
The source specifies its FB15K and WN18 training, validation, and test splits in §4.2 (p. 5) and its regularized negative-log-likelihood objective in Appendix A (p. 11). Table 2 (§4.3, pp. 6–7) reports results for CP, TransE, DistMult, and ComplEx, as the citing sentence says it takes from this source. (LLM, conf=0.92)
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Using the same search grid on embedding size and λ as [39] makes the results directly comparable to [39].
- Supported
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The time complexity of both SimplE-ignr and SimplE is O ( d ) , i.e. linear in the size of vector embeddings.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This number is 2 for SimplE and 4 for ComplEx .”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As argued earlier, with the same number of parameters, the number of computations in ComplEx are 4x and 2x more than SimplE-ignr and SimplE.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“According to ComplEx, the score for triple ( e 1 , r , e 3 ) is positive suggesting e 1 probably has relation r with e 3 . However the score for triple ( e 2 , r , e 3 ) is negative suggesting e 2 probably does not have relation r with e 3 .”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On FB15k, SimplE outperforms the existing baselines and gives state-of-the-art results among tensor factorization approaches.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Using the same search grid on embedding size and λ as [39] makes the results directly comparable to [39].
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For SimplE-ignr-bk and SimplE-bk, the filtered MRRs were 0 . 772 and 0 . 776 respectively, substantially higher than the case without background knowledge.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The rules in Table 2 correctly describe background knowledge in WN18.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For SimplE-ignr-bk, these numbers were 0 . 715 , 0 . 809 and 0 . 877 and for SimplE-bk they were 0 . 715 , 0 . 818 and 0 . 883 , also substantially higher than the models without background knowledge.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The rules in Table 2 correctly describe background knowledge in WN18.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These numbers were 0 . 334 , 0 . 404 , and 0 . 482 for SimplE, and 0 . 254 , 0 . 280 and 0 . 313 for ComplEx.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The rules in Table 2 correctly describe background knowledge in WN18.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As can be viewed in Table 2, most of the rules are of the form ∀ e i , e j ∈ E : ( e i , r 1 , e j ) ∈ ζ ⇔ ( e j , r 2 , e i ) ∈ ζ .”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Rests on an assumption: The rules in Table 2 correctly describe background knowledge in WN18.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Such interpretability allows the embeddings learned through SimplE for an entity (or relation) to be potentially transferred to other domains.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“SimplE can be viewed as a bilinear model similar to CP except that the M r matrices are constrained as in Fig 2(d).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In SimplE, each element of the embedding vector of the entities can be considered as a feature of the entity and the corresponding element of a relation can be considered as a measure of how important that feature is to the relation.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The constraint over M r matrices in SimplE is very similar to the constraint in DistMult.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“While the time complexity for TransE is O ( d ) where d is the size of the embedding vectors”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“RESCAL can be considered a bilinear model which imposes no constraints on the M r matrices.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Therefore, what is being learned about movies through observations about acted does not affect the predictions about likes and vice versa.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For ComplEx, if we consider the embedding for each entity e to be a single vector [ re e ; im e ] ∈ R 2 d , then it can be considered a bilinear model with its M r matrices constrained according to Fig. 2(b).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, with the same number of parameters, SimplE-ignr and SimplE reduce the computations by a factor of 4 and 2 respectively compared to ComplEx .”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A quadratic time complexity and parameter growth may arise two issues: 1- scalability problems, 2- overfitting.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Models with many parameters usually overfit and give poor performance.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“DistMult can be considered a bilinear model which restricts the M r matrices to be diagonal as in Fig. 2(a).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In CP, observations about likes only update the t vector of movies and observations about acted only update the h vector.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“DistMult and ComplEx have linear time complexities and the number of their parameters grow linearly with d .”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We showed that our model, called SimplE, performs very well empirically and has several interesting properties.”
Load-bearingStrength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“To address this issue, [4] proposed a modification to raw MRR.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [4] [4] Antoine Bordes, Nicolas Usunier, Alberto Garcia-Duran, Jason Weston, and Oksana Yakhnenko. Translating embeddings for modeling multi-relational data. In NIPS , pages 2787-2795, 2013. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We tuned our hyper-parameters over the validation set.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“MRR is a more robust measure than mean rank , since a single bad ranking can largely influence mean rank .”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“SimplE (and SimplE-ignr) work especially well on this dataset in terms of filtered MRR and hit@1 , so SimplE tends to do well at having its first prediction being correct.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Since the only difference between e 1 and e 2 is that the imaginary part changes from 4 to 6 , it is difficult to associate a meaning to these numbers.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedSingle caseTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For instance, three types of background knowledge can be incorporated into SimplE by tying the embeddings.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We computed the filtered MRR of our model over the validation set every 50 iterations for WN18 and every 100 iterations for FB 15 k and selected the iteration that resulted in the best validation filtered MRR.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Note that several other restrictions on the M r matrices are equivalent to SimplE, e.g., restricting M r matrices to be zero everywhere except on the counterdiagonal.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper relies on this without support.
Models with many parameters usually overfit and give poor performance.
“Models with many parameters usually overfit and give poor performance.”
The paper relies on this without support.
For a triple (h,r,t) to hold in FSTransE, we should ideally have p_rh + v_r = α q_rt for some α.
“For any entity e and relation r , let p re = P r v e and q re = Q r v e . For a triple ( h , r , t ) to hold, we should ideally have p rh + v r = αq rt for some α .”
The paper relies on this without support.
The rules in Table 2 correctly describe background knowledge in WN18.
“To test this empirically, we conducted an experiment on WN18 in which we incorporated several such rules into the embeddings as outlined in Propositions 3, 4, and 5. The rules can be found in Table 2.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Using the same search grid on embedding size and λ as [39] makes the results directly comparable to [39].
“We used the same search grid on embedding size and λ as [39] to make our results directly comparable to their results.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“SimplEx [152] has low performance for FB15k-237 and high performance for FB15k because FB15k contains inverse relations and SimplEx can model the inverse relations appropriately.”
From A Survey on Knowledge Graph Embeddings for Link Prediction (2021) · cites this paper as [152]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It has been demonstrated that SimplE is fully expressive, and therefore, unlike DistMult, it can model also asymmetric relations.”
From Knowledge Graph Embedding for Link Prediction (2021) · cites this paper as [27]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Examples of models that have been demonstrated to be fully expressive are SimplE [27], TuckER [6], ComplEx [61] and HolE [60].”
From Knowledge Graph Embedding for Link Prediction (2021) · cites this paper as [27]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Proposition 2 proof substitutes a multiplier for its reciprocal
MinorFrom p rs 1 + v r = α 3 q rs 2, substituting for q rs 2 requires division by α 3, not multiplication by it. The displayed equality therefore does not follow for general α 3.
“Therefore, p rs 2 + v r = α 2 q rs 2 = α 2 α 3 ( p rs 1 + v r )”
“Then we know p rs 1 + v r = α 3 q rs 2 .”
Citations
Cites
WordNet: a lexical database for English
Miller, G. A. (1995) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/219717.219748 · Cited by 14,015 · cited 1×
“Datasets: We conducted experiments on two standard benchmarks: WN18 a subset of Wordnet [24], and FB15k a subset of Freebase [2].”
MethodApproximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function
Cybenko, G. (1989) · Mathematics of Control, Signals, and Systems · doi:10.1007/bf02551274 · Cited by 13,883
TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Distributed Systems
Abadi, M., Agarwal, A., Barham, P., Brevdo, E., Chen, Z., Citro, C., Corrado, G. S., Davis, A., Dean, J., Devin, M., et al. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1603.04467 · Cited by 9,408 · cited 1×
“Implementation: We implemented SimplE in TensorFlow [1].”
Approximation capabilities of multilayer feedforward networks
Hornik, K. (1991) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/0893-6080(91)90009-t · Cited by 6,091 · cited 1×
“xpressive as it forces relations to be symmetric. It has been shown in [40] that ComplEx is fully expressive with embeddings of length at most jEjjRj. According to the universal approximation theorem [5, 16], under certain conditions, neural networks are universal approximators of continuous functions over compact set…”
BackgroundModeling Relational Data with Graph Convolutional Networks
Schlichtkrull, M., Kipf, T. N., Bloem, P., van den Berg, R., Titov, I., & Welling, M. (2018) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-93417-4_38 · Cited by 5,570 · cited 1×
“Viewing SimplE as a single-vector-per-entity model makes it easily integrable (or compatible) with other embedding models (in knowledge graph completion, computer vision and natural language processing) such as [35, 47, 36].”
BackgroundFreebase: a collaboratively created graph database for structuring human knowledge
Bollacker, K., Evans, C., Paritosh, P., Sturge, T., & Taylor, J. (2008) · Proceedings of the 2008 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data · doi:10.1145/1376616.1376746 · Cited by 4,852 · cited 2×
“We conducted experiments on two standard benchmarks: WN18 a subset of Wordnet (Miller, 1995), and FB15k a subset of Freebase (Bollacker et al., 2008).”
MethodKnowledge Graph Embedding by Translating on Hyperplanes
Wang, Z., Zhang, J., Feng, J., & Chen, Z. (2014) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v28i1.8870 · Cited by 3,915 · cited 1×
“Translational approaches (Bordes et al., 2013b; Ji et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2014; Nguyen et al., 2016) apply an additive function over the embeddings.”
MethodLearning Entity and Relation Embeddings for Knowledge Graph Completion
Lin, Y., Liu, Z., Sun, M., Liu, Y., & Zhu, X. (2015) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v29i1.9491 · Cited by 3,749 · cited 4×
“In TransE [4] In TransR [22], P r = Q r .”
InfluentialApproximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function
Cybenko, G. (1992) · Math. Control. Signals Syst. · doi:10.1007/bf02134016 · Cited by 3,475 · cited 1×
“According to the universal approximation theorem [5, 16], under certain conditions, neural networks are universal approximators of continuous functions over compact sets.”
BackgroundKnowledge Graph Embedding: A Survey of Approaches and Applications
Wang, Q., Mao, Z., Wang, B., & Guo, L. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2017.2754499 · Cited by 2,654 · cited 1×
“Details and discussions of these approaches can be found in several recent surveys [27, 43].”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
14 of the 69 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- [4][4] Antoine Bordes, Nicolas Usunier, Alberto Garcia-Duran, Jason Weston, and Oksana Yakhnenko. Translating embeddings for modeling multi-relational data. In NIPS , pages 2787-2795, 2013. -
- [28][28] Maximilian Nickel, Volker Tresp, and Hans-Peter Kriegel. A three-way model for collective learning on multi-relational data. In ICML , volume 11, pages 809-816, 2011. -
- [30][30] Maximilian Nickel, Xueyan Jiang, and Volker Tresp. Reducing the rank in relational factorization models by including observable patterns. In NIPS , pages 1179-1187, 2014. -
- [37][37] Richard Socher, Danqi Chen, Christopher D Manning, and Andrew Ng. Reasoning with neural tensor networks for knowledge base completion. In NIPS , 2013. -
- [42][42] Quan Wang, Bin Wang, Li Guo, et al. Knowledge base completion using embeddings and rules. In International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence , pages 1859-1866, 2015. -
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 475
Research hypothesis generation over scientific knowledge graphs
Borrego, A., Dessì, D., Ayala, D., Hernández, I., Osborne, F., Recupero, D. R., Buscaldi, D., Ruiz, D., & Motta, E. (2025) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2025.113280 · Cited by 16
Revisiting the Evaluation Protocol of Knowledge Graph Completion Methods for Link Prediction
Tiwari, S., Bansal, I., & Rivero, C. R. (2021) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3442381.3449856 · Cited by 12
“, in the implementation of SimplE [23], triple scores have been adjusted to the [−20, 20] interval.”
MethodInfluentialRelaGraph: Improving embedding on small-scale sparse knowledge graphs by neighborhood relations
Shi, B., Wang, H., Li, Y., & Deng, S. (2023) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103447 · Cited by 12
System 1 + System 2 = Better World: Neural-Symbolic Chain of Logic Reasoning
Hua, W., & Zhang, Y. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-emnlp.42 · Cited by 14
“…been devoted to building models for knowledge graph link prediction, such as TransE (Bordes et al., 2013), DistMult (Yang et al., 2014), Sim-plE (Kazemi and Poole, 2018), Complex (Trouil-lon et al., 2017), HGN (Yan et al., 2021), ConvE (Dettmers et al., 2018), ConvTransE (Shang et al., 2019),…”
BackgroundA divide and conquer framework for Knowledge Editing
Han, X., Li, R., Li, X., & Pan, J. Z. (2023) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2023.110826 · Cited by 12
CoRelatE: Learning the correlation in multi-fold relations for knowledge graph embedding
Huang, Y., Sun, H., Xu, K., Lu, S., Wang, T., & Zhang, X. (2020) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2020.106601 · Cited by 12
Rule-based data augmentation for knowledge graph embedding
Li, G., Sun, Z., Qian, L., Guo, Q., & Hu, W. P. (2021) · AI Open · doi:10.1016/j.aiopen.2021.09.003 · Cited by 11
ELP: Link prediction in social networks based on ego network perspective
Mishra, S., Singh, S. S., Kumar, A., et al. (2022) · Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications · doi:10.1016/j.physa.2022.128008 · Cited by 10
LHP: Logical hypergraph link prediction
Yang, Y., Li, X., Guan, Y., Wang, H., Kong, C., & Jiang, J. (2023) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.119842 · Cited by 11
Mam, S., Wichadakul, D., & Vateekul, P. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3289863 · Cited by 10
“By separating the different scoring functions for prediction, the efficiency of the model can be improved [32], [33].”
BackgroundSKYPER: Legal case retrieval via skeleton-aware hypergraph embedding in the hyperbolic space
Yan, S., & Zhang, Z. (2024) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2024.121162 · Cited by 11
Xu, X., Ma, R., Zhou, B., et al. (2024) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2024.103942 · Cited by 9
A review of background, methods, limitations and opportunities of knowledge graph completion
Li, D., Liang, Y., Qian, S., Wu, H., Jia, W., Fu, Y., & Sun, Y. (2025) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2025.100809 · Cited by 10
Specific Time Embedding for Temporal Knowledge Graph Completion
Ni, R., Ma, Z., Yu, K., & Xu, X. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Informatics & Cognitive Computing (ICCI*CC) · doi:10.1109/iccicc50026.2020.9450214 · Cited by 9
“Goel et al proposed a model use diachronic embedding, they extended the static model by replacing their entity embeddings with diachronic entity embeddings and got DE-TransE, DE-DistMult, DE-SimplE [7].”
BackgroundChekalina, V., Razzhigaev, A., Saiapin, A., Frolov, E., & Panchenko, A. (2022) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Student Research Workshop (ACL SRW) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-srw.27 · Cited by 11
Reasoning beyond Triples: Recent Advances in Knowledge Graph Embeddings
Xiong, B., Nayyeri, M., Daza, D., & Cochez, M. (2023) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3583780.3615294 · Cited by 10
“For example, HsimplE [17], m-CP [17], and GETD [32] generalize SimplE [33], Canonical Polyadic (CP) decomposition [34], and TuckER [35], respectively.”
BackgroundCoPE: Composition-based Poincaré embeddings for link prediction in knowledge graphs
Zeb, A., Saif, S., Chen, J., Yu, J. J. Q., Jiang, Q., & Zhang, D. (2024) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2024.120197 · Cited by 10
Meilicke, C., Chekol, M. W., Ruffinelli, D., & Stuckenschmidt, H. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-30179-8_20 · Cited by 12
Literal2Feature: An Automatic Scalable RDF Graph Feature Extractor
Moghaddam, F. B., Draschner, C. F., Lehmann, J., & Jabeen, H. (2021) · Studies on the semantic web · doi:10.3233/ssw210036 · Cited by 9
“SimplE [20], like DistMult, forces the relation embeddings to be diagonal matrices but extends it by a) associating two different embeddings, e h and e t with each entity e , depending on whether e is head or tail b) associating two distinct diagonal matrices, r and r − 1 , with each relation r ,…”
BackgroundMethodTemporal Knowledge Graph Reasoning with Low-rank and Model-agnostic Representations
Dikeoulias, I., Amin, S., & Neumann, G. (2022) · Workshop on Representation Learning for NLP (RepL4NLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.repl4nlp-1.12 · Cited by 9
A Neighborhood Re-Ranking Model With Relation Constraint for Knowledge Graph Completion
Yu, L., Hu, B., Liu, J., Chen, Y., & Xu, J. (2022) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2022.3225537 · Cited by 9
OERL: Enhanced Representation Learning via Open Knowledge Graphs
Li, Q., Wang, D., Feng, S., Song, K., Zhang, Y., & Yu, G. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2022.3218850 · Cited by 9
“…stage of representation learning, many models focused on capturing the potential structural features of KGs. Typical translation-based representation learning models, such as TransE [1], TransH [5], TransD [6] and SimplE [7], employ transitional operations to model the relations between entities.”
BackgroundMethodA Quick Prototype for Assessing OpenIE Knowledge Graph-Based Question-Answering Systems
Paolo, G. D., Rincon-Yanez, D., & Senatore, S. (2023) · Information · doi:10.3390/info14030186 · Cited by 9
A Semantic Enhanced Knowledge Graph Embedding Model With AIGC Designed for Healthcare Prediction
Yang, Q., He, M., Li, Z., He, T., & Jeon, S. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics · doi:10.1109/tce.2024.3398207 · Cited by 10
“SimplE [24] addresses the independence between embedding vectors.”
Hamming Distance Encoding Multihop Relation Knowledge Graph Completion
Chen, P., Wang, Y., Yu, Q., Fan, Y. H., & Feng, R. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3004448 · Cited by 9
LightCAKE: A Lightweight Framework for Context-Aware Knowledge Graph Embedding
Ning, Z., Qiao, Z., Dong, H., Du, Y., & Zhou, Y. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-75768-7_15 · Cited by 9
“SimplE [6]: SimplE is a simple interpretable fully-expressive tensor factorization model for knowledge graph completion.”
BackgroundText-Guided Legal Knowledge Graph Reasoning
Li, L., Bi, Z., Ye, H., Deng, S., Chen, H., & Tou, H. (2021) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-6471-7_3 · Cited by 13
“Numerous link prediction approaches [1,14,5] have been proposed for knowledge graph completion; however, there are still several non-trivial challenges for LPP:”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialKnowledge graph reasoning: Mainstream methods, applications and prospects
Liu, H., Yang, S., Shi, G., & Miao, Z. (2025) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2025.111625 · Cited by 13
Member-Augmented Group Recommendation With Multi-Interest Framework and Knowledge Graph Embeddings
Lin, S.-J., Chen, C.-T., & Huang, S.-H. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2023.3322732 · Cited by 8
“Tensor factorization [15] and neural networks [16] are the most commonly used approaches for implementing these methods.”
MethodWang, X., Zhang, K., Niu, M., & Wang, X. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2025.3528496 · Cited by 9
“Subsequently, models such as DistMult [29], ComplEx [30], and SimplE [31] have been proposed to provide more advanced modeling capabilities and more accurate knowledge graph completion results.”
Fantastic Knowledge Graph Embeddings and How to Find the Right Space for Them
Nayyeri, M., Xu, C., Vahdati, S., Vassilyeva, N., Sallinger, E., Yazdi, H. S., & Lehmann, J. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-62419-4_25 · Cited by 8
“However, neither of these models succeeded in solving the aforementioned problem [10].”
BackgroundKnowledge Router: Learning Disentangled Representations for Knowledge Graphs
Zhang, S., Rao, S. X., Tay, Y., & Zhang, C. (2021) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.1 · Cited by 8
“…the advantage of our approach, we compare the proposed method with several representative knowledge graph embedding approaches including TransE (Bordes et al., 2013), DistMult (Yang et al., 2014), ComplEx (Trouillon et al., 2016), SimplE (Kazemi and Poole, 2018), and QuatE (Zhang et al., 2019).”
MethodGFCNet: Utilizing graph feature collection networks for coronavirus knowledge graph embeddings
Xie, Z., Zhu, R., Liu, J., Zhou, G., Huang, J. X., & Cui, X. (2022) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2022.07.031 · Cited by 8
“Bilinear models, also called semantic matching models, use matrix decomposition to learn knowledge graph embeddings, including Rescal [36], DistMult [58], ComplEx [43], SimplE [25], TuckER [5] and MARINE [13].”
InfluentialSAppKG: Mobile App Recommendation Using Knowledge Graph and Side Information-A Secure Framework
Dave, D., Sharma, A., Abdulhamid, S. M., et al. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3296466 · Cited by 8
“The score function is thus given in (10): • SimplE [35]: The SimplE embedding model improves upon the canonical polyadic decomposition method of tensor factorization by obtaining two interdependent embeddings for each entity.”
MethodSimple and automated negative sampling for knowledge graph embedding
Zhang, Y., Yao, Q., & Chen, L. (2021) · The VLDB Journal · doi:10.1007/s00778-020-00640-7 · Cited by 14
“Evaluated by SimplE model onWN18RR (best viewed in color) (color figure online) matically balance E&E and further improve the performance on five benchmarks.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialKnowledge Base Completion: Baseline strikes back (Again)Preprint
Jain, P., Rathi, S., Mausam, & Chakrabarti, S. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.00804 · Cited by 12
“In contrast to additive KBC methods, DistMult and ComplEx (Yang et al., 2015; Trouillon et al., 2016; Lacroix et al., 2018; Jain et al., 2018; Balaˇzevi´c et al., 2019; Kazemi and Poole, 2018) can be regarded as multiplicative methods, for reasons clarified below.”
BackgroundMethodEntity-Relation Guided Random Walk for Link Prediction in Knowledge Graphs
Li, W., Zhong, H., Lin, R., Chang, C., Pan, Z., & Tang, Y. Z. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2024.3382263 · Cited by 7
“SMBMs, including RESCAL [23], DistMult [20], ComplEx [21], HolE [22], ANALOGY [41], and SimplE [40], leverage bilinear product or complex-valued tensor products to better capture semantic similarity and compatibility between entities and relations.”
MethodHKA: A Hierarchical Knowledge Alignment Framework for Multimodal Knowledge Graph Completion
Xu, Y., Li, Y., Xu, M., Zhu, Z., & Zhao, Y. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and Applications · doi:10.1145/3664288 · Cited by 7
“Similar to RESCAL, DisMult [41], ComplEx [33], Analogy [22], SimplE [14], and other methods increase the expressiveness of the model by imposing different constraints.”
Pan, J., Wang, R., Liu, W., Wang, L., You, Z., Li, Y., Duan, Z., Huang, Q., Feng, J., Sun, Y., et al. (2024) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2024.111647 · Cited by 7
Explainable knowledge graph embeddings for industrial process monitoring & control
Weyns, M., Blyau, T., Steenwinckel, B., De Turck, F., Van Hoecke, S., & Ongenae, F. (2025) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2025.103242 · Cited by 7
Hao, H., Si, G., Lu, L., Liu, Q., & Zhou, F. (2025) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2025.131590 · Cited by 8
AInvR: Adaptive Learning Rewards for Knowledge Graph Reasoning Using Agent Trajectories
Zhang, H., Lu, G., Qin, K., & Du, K. (2023) · Tsinghua Science & Technology · doi:10.26599/tst.2022.9010063 · Cited by 7
Wasserstein adversarial learning based temporal knowledge graph embedding
Dai, Y., Guo, W., & Eickhoff, C. (2023) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2023.120061 · Cited by 8
Spatiotemporal knowledge graph completion via diachronic and transregional word embedding
Xu, X., Jia, W. P., Li, Y., et al. (2024) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2024.120477 · Cited by 7
Few-shot Low-resource Knowledge Graph Completion with Reinforced Task Generation
Pei, S., Zhang, Q., & Zhang, X. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.455 · Cited by 7
“With the goal to overcome the shortcoming of canonical KG completion methods (Kazemi and Poole, 2018; Bordes et al., 2013; Nguyen et al., 2018) on inferring the missing triples associated with rare relations, several few-shot KG completion (FSKGC) algorithms have been developed for improving…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialHu, K., Zhu, X., Liu, H., Qu, Y., Wang, F. L., & Hao, T. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics · doi:10.1109/tce.2023.3302297 · Cited by 7
“Differed from the translational distance-based models, semantic matching models capture interactions between entities by tensor factorization methods [11], [12], [13], [14].”
MethodUsing Pairwise Occurrence Information to Improve Knowledge Graph Completion on Large-Scale Datasets
Balkır, E., Naslidnyk, M., Palfrey, D., et al. (2019) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1368 · Cited by 7
“To test the effect of our techniques on different bilinear models, we report results with DistMult (JoBi DistMult) and SimplE (JoBi SimplE) on FB15K237.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialAlam, M., Groth, P., de Boer, V., Pellegrini, T., Pandit, H. J., Montiel, E., Doncel, V. R., McGillivray, B. C., & Meroño-Peñuela, A. (2021) · Studies on the semantic web · doi:10.3233/ssw53 · Cited by 7
Aamer, N., Asim, M. N., Bhatti, A. I., & Dengel, A. (2025) · Journal of Translational Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12967-025-06789-5 · Cited by 6
“These methods can be categorized into 4 distinct families: translation-based models (TransE [34], PairRE [36], TripleRE [37]), rotation-based models (RotatE [41], QuatE[38]), semantic matching models (DistMult [35], ComplEx [40], SimplE [44], HAKE [42]), and hybrid approaches (DualE [39], HolE[43]).”
Guo, X., Wang, P., Gao, N., Wang, X., & Feng, W. (2022) · International Conference on Information Communication and Software Engineering (ICICSE) · doi:10.1109/icicse55337.2022.9828905 · Cited by 6
Yu, R., Liu, T., Yu, J. F., Zhang, W., Zhao, Y., Yang, M., Zhao, M., & Guo, J. (2023) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn54540.2023.10191552 · Cited by 6
“For static baselines, we use TransE, DistMult, SimpIE [37], RotatE, and QuatE.”
MethodNavigating Healthcare Insights: A Bird’s Eye View of Explainability with Knowledge Graphs
Garg, S., Parikh, S. B., & Garg, S. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Knowledge Engineering (AIKE) · doi:10.1109/aike59827.2023.00016 · Cited by 7
“…DDI SUMGNN[118] 2021 Attention [72], GNN [125] CE, BCE DrugBank [108], HetioNet [46], TWOSIDES [99] PyTorch DDI AAE [19] 2021 ComplEx [100], SimplE [56], Ro-tatE [98], WAA [18] BCE DeepDDI [85] (DrugBank [108]), Decagon [128] (TWOSIDES [99]) - DDI, DTI MHRW2Vec-TBAN [121] 2021 SANA [98], ComplEx…”
MHGTN: Multi-Interaction Heterogeneous Graph Transformer Network for Knowledge Graph Completion
Fan, L., Yuan, J., & Fan, Z. (2025) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2025.129368 · Cited by 7
He, M., Zhu, L., & Bai, L. (2025) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2025.113144 · Cited by 7
Loss-Aware Pattern Inference: A Correction on the Wrongly Claimed Limitations of Embedding Models
Nayyeri, M., Xu, C., Yaghoobzadeh, Y., Vahdati, S., Alam, M. M., Yazdi, H. S., & Lehmann, J. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-75768-7_7 · Cited by 6
Optimizing DNN Compilation for Distributed Training With Joint OP and Tensor Fusion
Yi, X., Zhang, S., Diao, L., Wu, C., Zheng, Z., Fan, S., Wang, S., Yang, J., & Lin, W. S. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems · doi:10.1109/tpds.2022.3201531 · Cited by 6
“purposes, [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41].”
A Survey on Approaches and Applications of Knowledge Representation Learning
Li, C., Li, A., Wang, Y., Tu, H., & Song, Y. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Data Science in Cyberspace · doi:10.1109/dsc50466.2020.00055 · Cited by 7
“SimplE [28] also belongs to the bilinear model.”
BackgroundZhao, Z., Papalexakis, E. E., & Ma, X. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.266 · Cited by 8
“Typical methods include RESCAL (Nickel et al., 2011), DistMult (Yang et al., 2015), Com-plEx (Trouillon et al., 2016), SimplE (Kazemi and Poole, 2018), and Tucker factorization (Balazevic et al., 2019).”
MethodRETRA: Recurrent Transformers for Learning Temporally Contextualized Knowledge Graph Embeddings
Werner, S., Rettinger, A., Halilaj, L., & Luettin, J. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-77385-4_25 · Cited by 8
“Since various SimplE implementation we tried did not scale to the size of this data set, we can’t report any results.”
MethodInfluentialEfficient Knowledge Graph Embedding Training Framework with Multiple GPUs
Sun, D., Huang, Z., Li, D., & Guo, M. (2022) · Tsinghua Science & Technology · doi:10.26599/tst.2021.9010067 · Cited by 6
PANC: Prototype Augmented Neighbor Constraint instance completion in knowledge graphs
Ma, R., Ma, Y., Zhang, H., Mei, B., Lv, G., & Zhao, L. (2022) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2022.119013 · Cited by 6
Infer the missing facts of D3FEND using knowledge graph representation learning
Khobragade, A., Ghumbre, S. U., & Pachghare, V. (2023) · International Journal of Web Information Systems · doi:10.1108/ijwis-03-2023-0042 · Cited by 6
A neural network for semantic labelling of structured information
Ayala, D., Borrego, A., Hernández, I., & Ruiz, D. (2019) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2019.113053 · Cited by 7
Guo, J., Yu, J. X., Zhao, M., Yu, M., Yu, R., Xu, L., Pan, Y., & Li, X. (2024) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2024.112268 · Cited by 5
Coherence mode: Characterizing local graph structural information for temporal knowledge graph
Si, Y., Hu, X., Cheng, Q., Liu, X., Liu, S., & Huang, J. (2024) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2024.121357 · Cited by 5
EiCoM: Multi-modal knowledge graph completion with enhanced information completeness
Ding, L., Li, M., Shi, P., Li, J., & Yuan, R. (2025) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2025.130940 · Cited by 7
NQE: N-ary Query Embedding for Complex Query Answering over Hyper-Relational Knowledge Graphs
Luo, H., Haihong, E., Yang, Y., Zhou, G., Guo, Y., Yao, T., Tang, Z., Lin, X., & Wan, K. (2023) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v37i4.25576 · Cited by 15
“…et al. 2018), n-TuckER (Liu, Yao, and Li 2020), HypE (Fatemi et al. 2020), and BoxE (Abboud et al. 2020), consider n-ary facts of the form r ( e 1 , e 2 . . . ) and are extended directly from binary relational models (Wang et al. 2014; Balazevic, Allen, and Hospedales 2019; Kazemi and Poole 2018).”
BackgroundZero-Shot Link Prediction in Knowledge Graphs with Large Language Models
Li, M., Ling, C., Zhang, R., & Zhao, L. (2024) · Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icdm59182.2024.00088 · Cited by 13
“Conventional methods [6, 7, 8] in KG link prediction learn low-dimensional representations of entities and relations, which are then used to infer links between entities.”
Structure-Aware Transformer for hyper-relational knowledge graph completion
Wang, J., Chen, H., & Zhang, W. (2025) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2025.126992 · Cited by 7
Learning entity-query dependency and query classification for temporal knowledge graph prediction
He, M., Zhu, L., & Bai, L. (2025) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2025.128016 · Cited by 5
SCS: Subgraph contrastive supervised neural network for link prediction
Yang, Q., Wei, W., Zhang, R., & Feng, X. (2025) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2025.122482 · Cited by 6
SeAttE: An Embedding Model Based on Separating Attribute Space for Knowledge Graph Completion
Liang, Z., Yang, J., Liu, H., Huang, K., Qu, L., Cui, L., & Li, X. (2022) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics11071058 · Cited by 5
A Brief Survey on Deep Learning-Based Temporal Knowledge Graph Completion
Jia, N., & Yao, C. (2024) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app14198871 · Cited by 6
Accurate Coupled Tensor Factorization with Knowledge Graph
Lee, S.-J., Park, Y.-C., & Kang, U. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata62323.2024.10825614 · Cited by 5
Faithfully Explaining Predictions of Knowledge Embeddings
Polleti, G., & Cozman, F. G. (2019) · doi:10.5753/eniac.2019.9343 · Cited by 5
“Similarly to SimplE, ITransF model also deals with interpretability on latent features level.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialKou, X., Luo, B., Hu, H., & Zhang, Y. (2020) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3340531.3412104 · Cited by 7
Augmenting Deep Learning with Relational Knowledge from Markov Logic Networks
Islam, M. M., Sarkhel, S., & Venugopal, D. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata50022.2020.9378055 · Cited by 5
“More recently Kazemi and Poole [19] proposed a tensor factorization approach called SimpleIE for link prediction that learns embeddings and also allows us to inject background knowledge.”
BackgroundFrom Closing Triangles to Higher-Order Motif Closures for Better Unsupervised Online Link Prediction
Rossi, R. A., Rao, A. B., Kim, S., et al. (2021) · Proceedings of the ... ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management · doi:10.1145/3459637.3481920 · Cited by 5
Yang, J., Shi, Y., Tong, X., Wang, R., Chen, T., & Ying, X. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-emnlp.46 · Cited by 5
Relation and Entropy Weight-Aware Knowledge Graph Embedding for Cloud Manufacturing
Zhao, F., Jin, L., Yang, L. T., & Jin, H. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2022.3178414 · Cited by 5
“embedding [20], and simple embedding SimplE [21].”
GGAT: Knowledge Graph Embedding Model via Global Information
Wang, Z., & Guo, Z. (2022) · Asia Conference on Algorithms, Computing and Machine Learning (CACML) · doi:10.1109/cacml55074.2022.00077 · Cited by 5
“When the embedding dimension satisfies, RESCAL [10], ComplEx [11] and SimplE [12] are capable of representing the real triples completely.”
Bouraoui, Z., Cornuéjols, A., Denœux, T., Destercke, S., Didier Dubois, A., Guillaume, R., Marques-Silva, J. P., Mengin, J., Prade, H. M., Schockaert, S., et al. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1912.06612 · Cited by 8
“he triple (e,R, f )holds if and only if sR(e,f)∈ Ris sufficiently high. Provided that the number of dimensions is sufficiently high, any knowledge graph can in principle be modelled exactly in this way [KP18]. To a more limited extent, such vector representations can even capture ontological rules [GS18]. In practice, h…”
BackgroundReasoning on Knowledge Graphs with Debate DynamicsPreprint
Hildebrandt, M. E., Serna, J. A. Q., Ma, Y., Ringsquandl, M., Joblin, M., & Tresp, V. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2001.00461 · Cited by 5
“…learning include the translational embedding methods TransE (Bordes et al. 2013) and TransR (Lin et al. 2015) as well as the factorization approaches RESCAL (Nickel, Tresp, and Kriegel 2011), DistMult (Yang et al. 2015), ComplEx (Trouillon et al. 2016), and SimplE (Kazemi and Poole 2018).”
MethodLeveraging neighborhood distance awareness for entity alignment in temporal knowledge graphs
Zhu, L., Li, G., & Bai, L. (2025) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2025.107181 · Cited by 4
HyperKGQA: Question Answering over Knowledge Graphs using Hyperbolic Representation Learning
Madjid, N. A., Khatib, O. E., Gao, S., & Difallah, D. E. (2022) · Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icdm54844.2022.00041 · Cited by 5
“SimplE [20] and TuckER [21] are based on Canonical Polyadic (CP) decomposition and Tucker decomposition, respectively.”
MethodEwLoss: A Exponential Weighted Loss Function for Knowledge Graph Embedding Models
Shen, Q., Zhang, H., & Liao, C. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3322204 · Cited by 4
“For instance, models such as SimplE [32], QuatE [33], Con-vKB [34], DihEdral [35], QuatRE [65], and ComplEx adopt a logistic loss function with an additional regularization term, as shown in (8).”
MethodWang, Y., Wegner, P., Domingo‐Fernándéz, D., & Kodamullil, A. T. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21502 · Cited by 4
Recommendations for Responding to System Security Incidents Using Knowledge Graph Embedding
Kim, H., & Choi, J. (2023) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics13010171 · Cited by 4
Explaining answers generated by knowledge graph embeddings
Ruschel, A., Gusmão, A. C., & Cozman, F. G. (2024) · International Journal of Approximate Reasoning · doi:10.1016/j.ijar.2024.109183 · Cited by 5
Fair large kernel embedding with relation-specific features extraction for link prediction
Zhang, Q., Huang, S., Xie, Q., Zhao, F., & Wang, G. (2024) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2024.120533 · Cited by 5
Symbolic Knowledge Reasoning on Hyper-Relational Knowledge Graphs
Wang, Z., Li, L., & Zeng, D. D. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Big Data · doi:10.1109/tbdata.2024.3423670 · Cited by 4
“Tensor factorization methods on KGs include DistMult [9], TuckER [10], SimplE [11], etc. m-DistMult [1] extends DistMult to higher orders and applies it to hyper-relational facts.”
Enrichment of Turkish question answering systems using knowledge graphs
Çiftçi, O., Soygazi, F., & Tekır, S. (2024) · TURKISH JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTER SCIENCES · doi:10.55730/1300-0632.4085 · Cited by 6
From Wide to Deep: Dimension Lifting Network for Parameter-Efficient Knowledge Graph Embedding
Cai, B., Xiang, Y., Gao, L., Wu, D., Zhang, H., Jin, J., & Luan, T. H. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2024.3437479 · Cited by 6
“For example, DistMult [19] applies an efficient diagonal relation matrix, ComplEx [20] introduces complex embedding to capture relation asymmetry, and SimplE [21] addresses the independence of entity embedding.”
MethodIncorporating Domain and Range of Relations for Knowledge Graph Completion
Li, J., Zhang, W., & Chen, H. (2019) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-1956-7_5 · Cited by 4
Zou, Y., & Qiu, D. (2020) · International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Design · doi:10.1109/iscid51228.2020.00026 · Cited by 4
“The SimplE model[11] proposed by Kazemi et al. in 2018 considered different positions of the same entity in the triple, that is, the same entity had different representations when it was in the first position and the third position of the triple.”
MethodLearning Context-based Embeddings for Knowledge Graph Completion
Pu, F., Zhang, Z., Feng, Y., & Yang, B. (2022) · Journal of Data and Information Science · doi:10.2478/jdis-2022-0009 · Cited by 4
“ComplEx and SimplE are both fully expressive with embedding vectors of size at most | E | | R |.”
InfluentialPolygonE: Modeling N-ary Relational Data as Gyro-Polygons in Hyperbolic Space
Yan, S., Zhang, Z., Sun, X., Xu, G., Li, S., Liu, Q., Liu, N., & Wang, S. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v36i4.20351 · Cited by 4
“As a widely used method for data augmentation (Kazemi and Poole 2018), reciprocal relations ( e ′ t , r − 1 , e ′ h ) are introduced for each binary relational fact and each primary triple in beyond-binary fact.”
MethodProtoE: Enhancing Knowledge Graph Completion Models with Unsupervised Type Representation Learning
Lu, Y., & Ichise, R. (2022) · Information · doi:10.3390/info13080354 · Cited by 4
Abnormal Entity-Aware Knowledge Graph Completion
Sun, K., Yu, S., Peng, C., et al. (2022) · IEEE ... International Conference on Data Mining workshops · doi:10.1109/icdmw58026.2022.00118 · Cited by 4
“This experiment leverages the recent state-of-the-art knowledge representation learning algorithms as baselines, including R-GCN [17], RDF2Vec [41], KGPTree [42], TransE [14], ComplEx [28], SimplE [43], and RotatE [44].”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Kazemi, S. M., & Poole, D.
- Affiliations
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- ORCID
- Poole, David
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2018
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1802.04868
- OpenAlex
- W2785761199
- Cited by
- 476
- References
- 69
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 80 · 2022: 91 · 2021: 95 · 2020: 70 · 2019: 20
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Computational Mathematics › Tensor decomposition and applications
- Keywords
- link prediction, knowledge graphs, SIMPLE, canonical polyadic decomposition, tensor decomposition, entity embeddings, weight tying, expressivity, interpretable embeddings
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-23, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-23 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
