The DOI matches its DataCite record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparing Task Simplifications to Learn Closed-Loop Object Picking Using Deep Reinforcement Learning
Open accessAbstract
Enabling autonomous robots to interact in unstructured environments with dynamic objects requires manipulation capabilities that can deal with clutter, changes, and objects' variability. This paper presents a comparison of different reinforcement learning-based approaches for object picking with a robotic manipulator. We learn closed-loop policies mapping depth camera inputs to motion commands and compare different approaches to keep the problem tractable, including reward shaping, curriculum learning and using a policy pre-trained on a task with a reduced action set to warm-start the full problem. For efficient and more flexible data collection, we train in simulation and transfer the policies to a real robot. We show that using curriculum learning, policies learned with a sparse reward formulation can be trained at similar rates as with a shaped reward. These policies result in success rates comparable to the policy initialized on the simplified task. We could successfully transfer these policies to the real robot with only minor modifications of the depth image filtering. We found that using a heuristic to warm-start the training was useful to enforce desired behavior, while the policies trained from scratch using a curriculum learned better to cope with unseen scenarios where objects are removed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Simulators allow training the controller with faster and safer procedures, and the learnt policy can be transferred to the real system.
“In principle, simulators allow to train the controller with faster and safer procedures: once the policy has been learnt, it is transferred to the real system ( sim-to-real transfer) [7].”
From Crossing the Reality Gap: A Survey on Sim-to-Real Transferability of Robot Controllers in Reinforcement Learning (2021) · cites this paper as [7]
Citations
Cites
Bengio, Y., Louradour, J., Collobert, R., & Weston, J. (2009) · Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.1145/1553374.1553380 · Cited by 5,366 · cited 3×
“methodology of curriculum learning [1], we guide the training of our models by progressively increasing the workspace with the agent’s performance and compare this method against reward function shaping and using a heuristic to bootstrap the full problem.”
BackgroundMethodDomain randomization for transferring deep neural networks from simulation to the real world
Tobin, J., Fong, R., Ray, A., Schneider, J., Zaremba, W., & Abbeel, P. (2017) · 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros.2017.8202133 · Cited by 3,124 · cited 2×
“representation that generalizes to the real-world [32], [33].”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sim-to-Real Transfer in Deep Reinforcement Learning for Robotics: a Survey
Zhao, W., Queralta, J. P., & Westerlund, T. (2020) · 2020 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI) · doi:10.1109/ssci47803.2020.9308468 · Cited by 941
Salvato, E., Fenu, G., Medvet, E., & Pellegrino, F. A. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3126658 · Cited by 200
Metadata
- Authors
- Breyer, M., Furrer, F., Novkovic, T., Siegwart, R., & Nieto, J.
- Affiliations
- ETH Zurich (CH)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2018
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1803.04996
- OpenAlex
- W2953129341
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
- Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- object picking, robotic manipulation, feedback control, deep reinforcement learning, reward shaping, curriculum learning, sparse rewards, sim-to-real transfer, depth camera, cluttered environments, dynamic objects
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review