PreprintCited by 2Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsRobot Manipulation and LearningDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparing Task Simplifications to Learn Closed-Loop Object Picking Using Deep Reinforcement Learning

Open access
Breyer, Michel, Furrer, Fadri, Novkovic, Tonci, Siegwart, Roland, Nieto, Juan·2018·arXiv

Abstract

Enabling autonomous robots to interact in unstructured environments with dynamic objects requires manipulation capabilities that can deal with clutter, changes, and objects' variability. This paper presents a comparison of different reinforcement learning-based approaches for object picking with a robotic manipulator. We learn closed-loop policies mapping depth camera inputs to motion commands and compare different approaches to keep the problem tractable, including reward shaping, curriculum learning and using a policy pre-trained on a task with a reduced action set to warm-start the full problem. For efficient and more flexible data collection, we train in simulation and transfer the policies to a real robot. We show that using curriculum learning, policies learned with a sparse reward formulation can be trained at similar rates as with a shaped reward. These policies result in success rates comparable to the policy initialized on the simplified task. We could successfully transfer these policies to the real robot with only minor modifications of the depth image filtering. We found that using a heuristic to warm-start the training was useful to enforce desired behavior, while the policies trained from scratch using a curriculum learned better to cope with unseen scenarios where objects are removed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1803.04996

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

  • Curriculum learning

    Bengio, Y., Louradour, J., Collobert, R., & Weston, J. (2009) · Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.1145/1553374.1553380 · Cited by 5,366 · cited 3×

    “methodology of curriculum learning [1], we guide the training of our models by progressively increasing the workspace with the agent’s performance and compare this method against reward function shaping and using a heuristic to bootstrap the full problem.”
    BackgroundMethod
  • Domain randomization for transferring deep neural networks from simulation to the real world

    Tobin, J., Fong, R., Ray, A., Schneider, J., Zaremba, W., & Abbeel, P. (2017) · 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros.2017.8202133 · Cited by 3,124 · cited 2×

    “representation that generalizes to the real-world [32], [33].”
    Background

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Breyer, M., Furrer, F., Novkovic, T., Siegwart, R., & Nieto, J.
Affiliations
ETH Zurich (CH)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2018
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2953129341
Cited by
1
References
2
Citations by year
2021: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
  • Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
object picking, robotic manipulation, feedback control, deep reinforcement learning, reward shaping, curriculum learning, sparse rewards, sim-to-real transfer, depth camera, cluttered environments, dynamic objects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review