CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 239Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesRelativity and Gravitational Theory

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

The Factorization Problem in Jackiw-Teitelboim Gravity

Open access
Harlow, Daniel, Jafferis, Daniel·2018·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1804.01081arXiv 1804.01081
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

In this note we study the $1+1$ dimensional Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity in Lorentzian signature, explicitly constructing the gauge-invariant classical phase space and the quantum Hilbert space and Hamiltonian. We also semiclassically compute the Hartle-Hawking wave function in two different bases of this Hilbert space. We then use these results to illustrate the gravitational version of the factorization problem of AdS/CFT: the Hilbert space of the two-boundary system tensor-factorizes on the CFT side, which appears to be in tension with the existence of gauge constraints in the bulk. In this model the tension is acute: we argue that JT gravity is a sensible quantum theory, based on a well-defined Lorentzian bulk path integral, which has no CFT dual. In bulk language, it has wormholes but it does not have black hole microstates. It does however give some hint as to what could be added to to rectify these issues, and we give an example of how this works using the SYK model. Finally we suggest that similar comments should apply to pure Einstein gravity in $2+1$ dimensions, which we'd then conclude also cannot have a CFT dual, consistent with the results of Maloney and Witten.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1804.01081

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There have been several distinct indications that the gravitational path integral is not equivalent to an ordinary quantum mechanical system.

    “There have been several distinct indications (Harlow and Jafferis 2018; Penington et al. 2019; Almheiri et al. 2020; Giddings and Turiaci 2020; Stanford 2020; Engelhardt et al. 2021; Johnson 2021; Saad et al. 2021a) that the gravitational path integral is not equivalent to an ordinary quantum mechanical system (where we interpret the boundary circles as representing Euclidean time).”

    From Solvable models of quantum black holes: a review on Jackiw–Teitelboim gravity (2023) · cites this paper as Harlow and Jafferis 2018

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 64

  1. E. Witten, Anti-de Sitter space and holography, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 253 [hep-th/9802150] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  2. S.S. Gubser, I.R. Klebanov and A.M. Polyakov, Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory, Phys. Lett. B 428 (1998) 105 [hep-th/9802109] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  3. T. Banks, M.R. Douglas, G.T. Horowitz and E.J. Martinec, AdS dynamics from conformal field theory, hep-th/9808016 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  4. O. Aharony, S.S. Gubser, J.M. Maldacena, H. Ooguri and Y. Oz, Large N field theories, string theory and gravity, Phys. Rept. 323 (2000) 183 [hep-th/9905111] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  5. A. Hamilton, D.N. Kabat, G. Lifschytz and D.A. Lowe, Holographic representation of local bulk operators, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 066009 [hep-th/0606141] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  6. I. Heemskerk, J. Penedones, J. Polchinski and J. Sully, Holography from Conformal Field Theory, JHEP 10 (2009) 079 [arXiv:0907.0151] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  7. I. Heemskerk, D. Marolf, J. Polchinski and J. Sully, Bulk and Transhorizon Measurements in AdS/CFT, JHEP 10 (2012) 165 [arXiv:1201.3664] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  8. I. Heemskerk, Construction of Bulk Fields with Gauge Redundancy, JHEP 09 (2012) 106 [arXiv:1201.3666] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  9. D. Harlow, TASI Lectures on the Emergence of Bulk Physics in AdS/CFT, PoS(TASI2017)002 (2018) [arXiv:1802.01040] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  10. T. Dray and G. 't Hooft, The Gravitational Shock Wave of a Massless Particle, Nucl. Phys. B 253 (1985) 173 [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  11. S.H. Shenker and D. Stanford, Black holes and the butterfly effect, JHEP 03 (2014) 067 [arXiv:1306.0622] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  12. S.H. Shenker and D. Stanford, Multiple Shocks, JHEP 12 (2014) 046 [arXiv:1312.3296] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  13. S.H. Shenker and D. Stanford, Stringy effects in scrambling, JHEP 05 (2015) 132 [arXiv:1412.6087] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  14. J. Polchinski, Chaos in the black hole S-matrix, arXiv:1505.08108 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  15. A. Almheiri, X. Dong and D. Harlow, Bulk Locality and Quantum Error Correction in AdS/CFT, JHEP 04 (2015) 163 [arXiv:1411.7041] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  16. F. Pastawski, B. Yoshida, D. Harlow and J. Preskill, Holographic quantum error-correcting codes: Toy models for the bulk/boundary correspondence, JHEP 06 (2015) 149 [arXiv:1503.06237] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  17. D. Harlow, The Ryu-Takayanagi Formula from Quantum Error Correction, Commun. Math. Phys. 354 (2017) 865 [arXiv:1607.03901] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  18. T. Hartman and J. Maldacena, Time Evolution of Entanglement Entropy from Black Hole Interiors, JHEP 05 (2013) 014 [arXiv:1303.1080] [INSPIRE]. JHEP02(2020)177 · DOI · Paper page
  19. L. Susskind, Computational Complexity and Black Hole Horizons, Fortsch. Phys. 64 (2016) 44 [arXiv:1403.5695] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  20. L. Susskind, The Typical-State Paradox: Diagnosing Horizons with Complexity, Fortsch. Phys. 64 (2016) 84 [arXiv:1507.02287] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  21. A.R. Brown, D.A. Roberts, L. Susskind, B. Swingle and Y. Zhao, Holographic Complexity Equals Bulk Action?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 191301 [arXiv:1509.07876] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  22. A.R. Brown, D.A. Roberts, L. Susskind, B. Swingle and Y. Zhao, Complexity, action and black holes, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 086006 [arXiv:1512.04993] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  23. S.L. Braunstein, S. Pirandola and K. Życzkowski, Better Late than Never: Information Retrieval from Black Holes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 101301 [arXiv:0907.1190] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  24. A. Almheiri, D. Marolf, J. Polchinski and J. Sully, Black Holes: Complementarity or Firewalls?, JHEP 02 (2013) 062 [arXiv:1207.3123] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  25. D.M. Eardley, Black hole boundary conditions and coordinate conditions, Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 2299 [gr-qc/9703027] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  26. R. Bousso and N. Engelhardt, New Area Law in General Relativity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 081301 [arXiv:1504.07627] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  27. D. Harlow, Wormholes, Emergent Gauge Fields and the Weak Gravity Conjecture, JHEP 01 (2016) 122 [arXiv:1510.07911] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  28. M. Guica and D.L. Jafferis, On the construction of charged operators inside an eternal black hole, SciPost Phys. 3 (2017) 016 [arXiv:1511.05627] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  29. R. Jackiw, Lower Dimensional Gravity, Nucl. Phys. B 252 (1985) 343 [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  30. C. Teitelboim, Gravitation and Hamiltonian Structure in Two Space-Time Dimensions, Phys. Lett. 126B (1983) 41 [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  31. A. Almheiri and J. Polchinski, Models of AdS 2 backreaction and holography, JHEP 11 (2015) 014 [arXiv:1402.6334] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  32. K.V. Kuchar, J.D. Romano and M. Varadarajan, Dirac constraint quantization of a dilatonic model of gravitational collapse, Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 795 [gr-qc/9608011] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  33. D. Nickel and D.T. Son, Deconstructing holographic liquids, New J. Phys. 13 (2011) 075010 [arXiv:1009.3094] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  34. M. Crossley, P. Glorioso, H. Liu and Y. Wang, Off-shell hydrodynamics from holography, JHEP 02 (2016) 124 [arXiv:1504.07611] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  35. G. Sárosi, AdS 2 holography and the SYK model, PoS(Modave2017)001 (2018) [arXiv:1711.08482] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  36. S. Sachdev and J. Ye, Gapless spin fluid ground state in a random, quantum Heisenberg magnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 (1993) 3339 [cond-mat/9212030] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  37. J. Polchinski and V. Rosenhaus, The Spectrum in the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev Model, JHEP 04 (2016) 001 [arXiv:1601.06768] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  38. J. Maldacena and D. Stanford, Remarks on the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 106002 [arXiv:1604.07818] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  39. A. Kitaev and S.J. Suh, The soft mode in the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model and its gravity dual, JHEP 05 (2018) 183 [arXiv:1711.08467] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  40. K. Jensen, Chaos in AdS 2 Holography, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 111601 [arXiv:1605.06098] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  41. J. Engelsöy, T.G. Mertens and H. Verlinde, An investigation of AdS 2 backreaction and holography, JHEP 07 (2016) 139 [arXiv:1606.03438] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  42. J. Maldacena, D. Stanford and Z. Yang, Conformal symmetry and its breaking in two dimensional Nearly Anti-de-Sitter space, PTEP 2016 (2016) 12C104 [arXiv:1606.01857] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  43. M. Henneaux, Quantum gravity in two-dimensions: exact solution of the Jackiw model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54 (1985) 959 [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  44. J. Navarro-Salas, M. Navarro and V. Aldaya, Covariant phase space quantization of the Jackiw-Teitelboim model of 2-D gravity, Phys. Lett. B 292 (1992) 19 [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  45. C.P. Constantinidis, O. Piguet and A. Perez, Quantization of the Jackiw-Teitelboim model, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 084007 [arXiv:0812.0577] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  46. P. Nayak, A. Shukla, R.M. Soni, S.P. Trivedi and V. Vishal, On the Dynamics of Near-Extremal Black Holes, JHEP 09 (2018) 048 [arXiv:1802.09547] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  47. V. Balasubramanian and P. Kraus, A Stress tensor for Anti-de Sitter gravity, Commun. Math. Phys. 208 (1999) 413 [hep-th/9902121] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  48. M. Srinivas and R. Vijayalakshmi, The 'time of occurrence' in quantum mechanics, Pramana 16 (1981) 173. · DOI
  49. J.B. Hartle and S.W. Hawking, Path Integral Derivation of Black Hole Radiance, Phys. Rev. D 13 (1976) 2188 [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  50. W. Israel, Thermo field dynamics of black holes, Phys. Lett. A 57 (1976) 107 [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  51. J. Polchinski, String theory. Vol. 1: An introduction to the bosonic string, Cambridge University Press (2007) [INSPIRE].
  52. D. Stanford and E. Witten, Fermionic Localization of the Schwarzian Theory, JHEP 10 (2017) 008 [arXiv:1703.04612] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  53. J.M. Maldacena, Eternal black holes in anti-de Sitter, JHEP 04 (2003) 021 [hep-th/0106112] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  54. D. Harlow, Jerusalem Lectures on Black Holes and Quantum Information, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88 (2016) 015002 [arXiv:1409.1231] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  55. D. Harlow and P. Hayden, Quantum Computation vs. Firewalls, JHEP 06 (2013) 085 [arXiv:1301.4504] [INSPIRE]. JHEP02(2020)177 · DOI · Paper page
  56. K. Papadodimas and S. Raju, Local Operators in the Eternal Black Hole, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 211601 [arXiv:1502.06692] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  57. I.R. Klebanov and A.M. Polyakov, AdS dual of the critical O(N) vector model, Phys. Lett. B 550 (2002) 213 [hep-th/0210114] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  58. J. Hubbard, Calculation of partition functions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 3 (1959) 77 [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  59. D.L. Jafferis, Bulk reconstruction and the Hartle-Hawking wavefunction, arXiv:1703.01519 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  60. E. Witten, (2 + 1)-Dimensional Gravity as an Exactly Soluble System, Nucl. Phys. B 311 (1988) 46 [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  61. E. Witten, Three-Dimensional Gravity Revisited, arXiv:0706.3359 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  62. M. Bañados, C. Teitelboim and J. Zanelli, The Black hole in three-dimensional space-time, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 (1992) 1849 [hep-th/9204099] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  63. A. Maloney, Geometric Microstates for the Three Dimensional Black Hole?, arXiv:1508.04079 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  64. A. Maloney and E. Witten, Quantum Gravity Partition Functions in Three Dimensions, JHEP 02 (2010) 029 [arXiv:0712.0155] [INSPIRE]. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Harlow, D., & Jafferis, D.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Harlow, Daniel
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2018
Volume
2020
Issue
2
ISSN
1029-8479 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1804.01081
arXiv
1804.01081
OpenAlex
W2795816826
Cited by
239
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 5
FWCI
12.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of High Energy Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Simons Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
Keywords
Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity, factorization problem, AdS/CFT correspondence, 1+1 dimensional gravity, Lorentzian signature, classical phase space, quantum Hilbert space, Hamiltonian, Hartle-Hawking wave function, semiclassical quantization, gauge constraints, wormholes, black hole microstates, SYK model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review