Speech Commands: A Dataset for Limited-Vocabulary Speech Recognition
Open accessAbstract
Describes an audio dataset of spoken words designed to help train and evaluate keyword spotting systems. Discusses why this task is an interesting challenge, and why it requires a specialized dataset that is different from conventional datasets used for automatic speech recognition of full sentences. Suggests a methodology for reproducible and comparable accuracy metrics for this task. Describes how the data was collected and verified, what it contains, previous versions and properties. Concludes by reporting baseline results of models trained on this dataset.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The NeuRRAM chip achieves 1.6-times to 2.3-times lower EDP and 7-times to 13-times higher computational density at various MVM input and output bit-precisions than previous state-of-the-art RRAM-based CIM chips, despite being fabricated at an older technology node.
“the NeuRRAM chip achieves 1.6-times to 2.3-times lower EDP and 7-times to 13-times higher computational density (measured by throughput per million of RRAMs) at various MVM input and output bit-precisions than previous state-of-the-art RRAM-based CIM chips, despite being fabricated at an older technology node17–27,36.”
From A compute-in-memory chip based on resistive random-access memory (2022) · cites this paper as [20]
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
“Librispeech: an ASR corpus based on public domain audio books,”
Panayotov, V., Chen, G., Povey, D., & Khudanpur, S. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) · doi:10.1109/icassp.2015.7178964 · Cited by 6,072 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- [19][19] T. N. Sainath and C. Parada, 'Convolutional Neural Networks for Small-Footprint Keyword Spotting,' in Sixteenth Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association , 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.isca-speech.org/archive/interspeech\_2015/papers/i15\_1478.pdf -
- [21][21] L. Lai, N. Suda, and V. Chandra, 'CMSIS-NN: Efficient Neural Network Kernels for Arm Cortex-M CPUs,' ArXiv e-prints , Jan. 2018. -
- [22][22] B. McMahan and D. Rao, 'Listening to the World Improves Speech Command Recognition,' ArXiv e-prints , Oct. 2017. -
- [23][23] J. Salamon, C. Jacoby, and J. P. Bello, 'A dataset and taxonomy for urban sound research,' in Proceedings of the 22Nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia , ser. MM '14. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2014, pp. 1041-1044. [Online]. Available: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2647868.2655045 - · DOI
- [24][24] M. Alzantot, B. Balaji, and M. Srivastava, 'Did you hear that? Adversarial Examples Against Automatic Speech Recognition,' ArXiv e-prints , Jan. 2018. -
- [25][25] R. Tang and J. Lin, 'Deep Residual Learning for Small-Footprint Keyword Spotting,' ArXiv e-prints , Oct. 2017. -
- [26][26] J. Lee, T. Kim, J. Park, and J. Nam, 'Raw Waveform-based Audio Classification Using Sample-level CNN Architectures,' ArXiv e-prints , Dec. 2017. -
- [27][27] S. Krishna Gouda, S. Kanetkar, D. Harrison, and M. K. Warmuth, 'Speech Recognition: Keyword Spotting Through Image Recognition,' ArXiv e-prints , Mar. 2018.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Robust and Communication-Efficient Federated Learning From Non-i.i.d. Data
Sattler, F., Wiedemann, S., Muller, K.-R., & Samek, W. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2019.2944481 · Cited by 1,725 · see citing works
AST: Audio Spectrogram Transformer
Gong, Y., Chung, Y.-A., & Glass, J. (2021) · Interspeech 2021 · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2021-698 · Cited by 1,159 · see citing works
Mamba: Linear-Time Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spaces
Gu, A., & Dao, T. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.00752 · Cited by 1,579 · see citing works
A compute-in-memory chip based on resistive random-access memory
Wan, W., Kubendran, R., Schaefer, C., Eryilmaz, S. B., Zhang, W., Wu, D., Deiss, S., Raina, P., Qian, H., Gao, B., et al. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04992-8 · Cited by 943 · see citing works
Self-supervised speech representation learning: A review
Mohamed, A., Lee, H.-Y., Borgholt, L., Havtorn, J. D., Edin, J., Igel, C., Kirchhoff, K., Li, S.-W., Livescu, K., Maaløe, L., et al. (2022) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/jstsp.2022.3207050 · Cited by 372 · see citing works
“Last, [116] puts together five datasets (MUSAN [245], Bird Audio Detection [246], Speech Commands [247], Spoken Language Identification [248], and TUT Urban Acoustic Scenes”
BackgroundInfluentialSsast: Self-supervised audio spectrogram transformer
Gong, Y., Lai, C.-I., Chung, Y.-A., & Glass, J. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v36i10.21315 · Cited by 294 · see citing works
Federated Learning for Keyword Spotting
Leroy, D., Coucke, A., Lavril, T., Gisselbrecht, T., & Dureau, J. (2019) · ICASSP 2019 - 2019 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) · doi:10.1109/icassp.2019.8683546 · Cited by 291 · see citing works
HTS-AT: A Hierarchical Token-Semantic Audio Transformer for Sound Classification and Detection
Chen, K., Du, X., Zhu, B., Ma, Z., Berg-Kirkpatrick, T., & Dubnov, S. (2022) · ICASSP 2022 - 2022 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) · doi:10.1109/icassp43922.2022.9746312 · Cited by 294 · see citing works
Zhang, Y., Park, D. S., Han, W., Qin, J., Gulati, A., Shor, J., Jansen, A., Xu, Y., Huang, Y., Wang, S., et al. (2022) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/jstsp.2022.3182537 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Widening Access to Applied Machine Learning with TinyML
Janapa Reddi, V., Plancher, B., Kennedy, S., Moroney, L., Warden, P., Suzuki, L., Agarwal, A., Banbury, C., Banzi, M., Bennett, M., et al. (2022) · Harvard Data Science Review · doi:10.1162/99608f92.762d171a · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Self-citationEfficient edge-ai application deployment for fpgas
Kalapothas, S., Flamis, G., & Kitsos, P. (2022) · Information · doi:10.3390/info13060279 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
tinyCare: A tinyML-based Low-Cost Continuous Blood Pressure Estimation on the Extreme Edge
Ahmed, K., & Hassan, M. (2022) · 2022 IEEE 10th International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI) · doi:10.1109/ichi54592.2022.00047 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
TinySpeech: Attention Condensers for Deep Speech Recognition Neural Networks on Edge Devices
Wong, A., Famouri, M., Pavlova, M., & Surana, S. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2008.04245 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Earthquake Detection with tinyML
Clements, T. (2023) · Seismological Research Letters · doi:10.1785/0220220322 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Hardy, E., & Badets, F. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.04792 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
A cascade framework for on-device uncertainty-aware event detection on microcontrollers
Jia, H., Kwon, Y. D., Ma, D., Pham, N., Qendro, L., Vu, T., & Mascolo, C. (2026) · Pervasive and Mobile Computing · doi:10.1016/j.pmcj.2026.102208 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
QUTE: Quantifying Uncertainty in TinyML with Early-exit-assisted ensembles for model-monitoring
Ghanathe, N. P., & Wilton, S. J. E. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.12599
- Authors
- Warden, P.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2018
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1804.03209
- OpenAlex
- W2797583228
- Cited by
- 1,033
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 140 · 2023: 227 · 2022: 197 · 2021: 191 · 2020: 135 · 2019: 82 · 2018: 14
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
- Keywords
- keyword spotting, voice commands, spoken word, accuracy measures, reproducibility, data collection, baseline results
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
