PreprintCited by 36Memory and Neural MechanismsSpatial Cognition and NavigationNeural dynamics and brain function

Generalisation of structural knowledge in the hippocampal-entorhinal system

Open access
Whittington, James C. R., Muller, Timothy H., Mark, Shirley, Barry, Caswell, Behrens, Timothy E. J.·2018·arXiv

Abstract

A central problem to understanding intelligence is the concept of generalisation. This allows previously learnt structure to be exploited to solve tasks in novel situations differing in their particularities. We take inspiration from neuroscience, specifically the hippocampal-entorhinal system known to be important for generalisation. We propose that to generalise structural knowledge, the representations of the structure of the world, i.e. how entities in the world relate to each other, need to be separated from representations of the entities themselves. We show, under these principles, artificial neural networks embedded with hierarchy and fast Hebbian memory, can learn the statistics of memories and generalise structural knowledge. Spatial neuronal representations mirroring those found in the brain emerge, suggesting spatial cognition is an instance of more general organising principles. We further unify many entorhinal cell types as basis functions for constructing transition graphs, and show these representations effectively utilise memories. We experimentally support model assumptions, showing a preserved relationship between entorhinal grid and hippocampal place cells across environments.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1805.09042

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • According to IWMT, coherent self-world modeling likely requires organizing information into spatiotemporal trajectories.

    “According to IWMT, coherent self-world modeling likely also requires organizing this information into spatiotemporal trajectories”

    From An Integrated World Modeling Theory (IWMT) of Consciousness (2020) · cites this paper as Whittington et al., 2018

  • The hippocampal system and machine learning architectures that attempt to reproduce its functioning afford spatiotemporal trajectories.

    “as afforded by the hippocampal system and machine learning architectures that attempt to reproduce its functioning”

    From An Integrated World Modeling Theory (IWMT) of Consciousness (2020) · cites this paper as Whittington et al., 2018

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Whittington, J. C. R., Muller, T. H., Mark, S., Barry, C., & Behrens, T. E. J.
Affiliations
  • John Radcliffe Hospital (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2018
Volume
31
Pages
8484-8495
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2804040390
Cited by
36
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • James S. McDonnell Foundation (JSMF220020372)
  • Wellcome Trust (WT104765MA)
  • Medical Research Council
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
generalization, structural knowledge, place cells, spatial cognition, artificial neural networks, hierarchical representation, state diagrams, intelligence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review