Cited by 749Memory and Neural MechanismsSpatial Cognition and NavigationNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

Hippocampal remapping and grid realignment in entorhinal cortex

Fyhn, Marianne, Hafting, Torkel, Treves, Alessandro, Moser, May-Britt, Moser, Edvard I.·2007·Nature

Abstract

A fundamental property of many associative memory networks is the ability to decorrelate overlapping input patterns before information is stored. In the hippocampus, this neuronal pattern separation is expressed as the tendency of ensembles of place cells to undergo extensive 'remapping' in response to changes in the sensory or motivational inputs to the hippocampus. Remapping is expressed under some conditions as a change of firing rates in the presence of a stable place code ('rate remapping'), and under other conditions as a complete reorganization of the hippocampal place code in which both place and rate of firing take statistically independent values ('global remapping'). Here we show that the nature of hippocampal remapping can be predicted by ensemble dynamics in place-selective grid cells in the medial entorhinal cortex, one synapse upstream of the hippocampus. Whereas rate remapping is associated with stable grid fields, global remapping is always accompanied by a coordinate shift in the firing vertices of the grid cells. Grid fields of co-localized medial entorhinal cortex cells move and rotate in concert during this realignment. In contrast to the multiple environment-specific representations coded by place cells in the hippocampus, local ensembles of grid cells thus maintain a constant spatial phase structure, allowing position to be represented and updated by the same translation mechanism in all environments encountered by the animal.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature05601

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mammalian PCs are notable for their representational flexibility, while other spatial cells exhibit more coherent shifts across environments.

    “Mammalian PCs are notable for their representational flexibility10,40,41, while other spatial cells exhibit more coherent shifts across environments42–44.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fyhn, M., Hafting, T., Treves, A., Moser, M.-B., & Moser, E. I.
Affiliations
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
  • Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati (IT)
Corresponding author
Moser, Edvard I.
Venue
Nature
Published
2007-02-25
Volume
446
Issue
7132
Pages
190-194
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2037628926
Cited by
749
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 36
FWCI
17.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • SDL (submittedVersion)
Funders
Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
grid cells, medial entorhinal cortex, place cells, spatial navigation, spatial memory, ensemble dynamics, position representation
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain Mapping, Cues, Hippocampus, Models, Neurological, Synapses, Entorhinal Cortex, Rats, Long-Evans, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review