CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 104Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum many-body systemsQuantum Mechanics and Applications

$O(N^3)$ Measurement Cost for Variational Quantum Eigensolver on Molecular Hamiltonians

Open access
Gokhale, Pranav, Chong, Frederic T.·2019·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1908.11857arXiv 1908.11857
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE) is a promising algorithm for near-term quantum machines. It can be used to estimate the ground state energy of a molecule by performing separate measurements of $O(N^4)$ terms. Several recent papers observed that this scaling may be reducible to $O(N^3)$ by partitioning the terms into linear-sized commuting families that can be measured simultaneously. We confirm these empirical observations by studying the MIN-COMMUTING-PARTITION problem at the level of the fermionic Hamiltonian and its encoding into qubits. Moreover, we provide a fast, pre-computable procedure for creating linearly-sized commuting partitions by solving a round-robin scheduling problem via flow networks.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1908.11857

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For specific problems such as chemistry and condensed matter systems, it is possible to use the structure of the problem to reduce the number of measurements.

    “For specific problems such as chemistry and condensed matter systems, it is possible to use the structure of the problem to reduce the number of measurements (Cade et al. , 2020; Cai, 2020; Gokhale and Chong, 2019; Huggins et al. , 2019).”

    From Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms (2022) · cites this paper as Gokhale and Chong, 2019

    The Introduction and Conclusion describe using molecular Hamiltonian structure to reduce VQE measurement cost, supporting the chemistry example. The cited paper does not establish the corresponding claim for condensed matter systems. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 84

  1. J. Preskill, "Quantum computing in the NISQ era and beyond," Quantum, vol. 2, 2018, Art. no. 79, doi: 10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79. · DOI · Paper page
  2. P. W. Shor, "Polynomial-time algorithms for prime factorization and dis- crete logarithms on a quantum computer," SIAM Rev., vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 303-332, 1999, doi: 10.1137/S0097539795293172. · DOI · Paper page
  3. L. K. Grover, "A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search," Proc. 28th Annu. ACM Symp. Theory Comput., 1996, pp. 212-219, doi: 10.1145/237814.237866. · DOI · Paper page
  4. A. Peruzzo et al., "A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor," Nat. Commun., vol. 5, 2014, Art. no. 4213, doi: 10.1038/ncomms5213. · DOI · Paper page
  5. G. Nannicini, "Performance of hybrid quantum-classical variational heuristics for combinatorial optimization," Phys. Rev. E, vol. 99, no. 1, 2019, Art. no. 013304, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.99.013304. · DOI · Paper page
  6. N. Moll et al., "Quantum optimization using variational algorithms on near-term quantum devices," Quantum Sci. Technol., vol. 3, no. 3, 2018, Art. no. 030503, doi: 10.1088/2058-9565%2Faab822. · DOI · Paper page
  7. A. Y. Kitaev, "Quantum measurements and the Abelian stabilizer prob- lem," 1995, arXiv:quant-ph/9511026. · arXiv
  8. R. Cleve, A. Ekert, C. Macchiavello, and M. Mosca, "Quantum algorithms revisited," in Proc. Roy. Soc. London A, Math., Phys. Eng. Sci., vol. 454, no. 1969, pp. 339-354, 1998, doi: 10.1098/rspa.1998.0164. · DOI
  9. T. S. Metodi, A. I. Faruque, and F. T. Chong, Quantum Computing for Computer Architects (Synthesis Lectures on Computer Architecture), vol. 6, no. 1. San Rafael, CA, USA: Morgan & Claypool, 2011, pp. 1-203, doi: 10.2200/S00331ED1V01Y201101CAC013. · DOI
  10. M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum In- formation (10th Anniversary Version). Cambridge U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2010, doi: 10.1119/1.1463744. · DOI · Paper page
  11. R. Shankar, Principles of Quantum Mechanics. New York, NY, USA: Springer, 2012, doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-0576-8. · DOI
  12. R. A. Horn and C. R. Johnson, Matrix Analysis. Cambridge U.K.: Cam- bridge Univ. Press, 2012, doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511810817. · DOI
  13. D. L. Strout and G. E. Scuseria, "A quantitative study of the scaling properties of the Hartree-Fock method," J. Chem. Phys., vol. 102, no. 21, pp. 8448-8452, 1995, doi: 10.1063/1.468836. · DOI
  14. G. Kresse and J. Furthmller, "Efficiency of ab-initio total energy cal- culations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set," Comput. Mater. Sci., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 15-50, 1996, doi: 10.1016/0927- 0256%2896%2900008-0. · DOI
  15. G. E. Scuseria and T. J. Lee, "Comparison of coupledcluster methods which include the effects of connected triple excitations," J. Chem. Phys., vol. 93, no. 8, pp. 5851-5855, 1990, doi: 10.1063/1.459684. · DOI
  16. K. Sugisaki, S. Nakazawa, K. Toyota, K. Sato, D. Shiomi, and T. Takui, "Quantum chemistry on quantum computers: A method for preparation of multiconfigurational wave functions on quantum computers without per- forming post-Hartree-Fock calculations," ACS Central Sci., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 167-175, 2018, doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.8b00788. · DOI
  17. H. Eyring, "The activated complex in chemical reactions," J. Chem. Phys., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 107-115, 1935, doi: 10.1063/1.1749604. · DOI
  18. H. Paulsen and A. X. Trautwein, "Density functional theory calculations for spin crossover complexes," in Spin Crossover in Transition Metal Compounds III. New York, NY, USA: Springer, 2004, pp. 197-219, doi: 10.1007/B95428. · DOI
  19. S. McArdle, S. Endo, A. Aspuru-Guzik, S. Benjamin, and X. Yuan, "Quantum computational chemistry," Rev. Mod. Phys., vol. 92, 2020, Art. no. 015003, doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.92.015003. · DOI · Paper page
  20. R. M. Parrish et al., "Psi4 1.1: An open-source electronic structure pro- gram emphasizing automation, advanced libraries, and interoperability," J. Chem. Theory Comput., vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 3185-3197, 2017, doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00174. · DOI
  21. Q. Sun et al., "PYSCF: The python-based simulations of chemistry frame- work," Wiley Interdiscipl. Rev., Comput. Mol. Sci., vol. 8, no. 1, 2018, Art. no. e1340, doi: 10.1002/wcms.1340. · DOI
  22. J. R. McClean et al., "OpenFermion: The electronic structure pack- age for quantum computers," Quantum Sci. Technol., vol. 5, 2020, Art. no. 034014, doi: 10.1088/2058-9565%2FAB8EBC. · DOI
  23. D. Wecker, B. Bauer, B. K. Clark, M. B. Hastings, and M. Troyer, "Gate- count estimates for performing quantum chemistry on small quantum computers," Phys. Rev. A, vol. 90, no. 2, 2014, Art. no. 022305, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.90.022305. · DOI · Paper page
  24. M. B. Hastings, D. Wecker, B. Bauer, and M. Troyer, "Improving quantum algorithms for quantum chemistry," Quantum Inform. Comput., vol. 15, no. 1/2, pp. 1-21, 2015.
  25. P. Jordan and E. P. Wigner, "About the Pauli exclusion principle," Z. Phys., vol. 47, pp. 631-651, 1928, doi: 10.1007/BF01331938. · DOI · Paper page
  26. J. T. Seeley, M. J. Richard, and P. J. Love, "The Bravyi-Kitaev transfor- mation for quantum computation of electronic structure," J. Chem. Phys., vol. 137, no. 22, 2012, Art. no. 224109, doi: 10.1063/1.4768229. · DOI · Paper page
  27. S. B. Bravyi and A. Y. Kitaev, "Fermionic quantum computation," Ann. Phys., vol. 298, no. 1, pp. 210-226, 2002, doi: 10.1006/aphy.2002.6254. · DOI · Paper page
  28. R. J. Bartlett and M. Musiał, "Coupled-cluster theory in quantum chemistry," Rev. Mod. Phys., vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 291-352, 2007, doi: 10.1103/REVMODPHYS.79.291. · DOI · Paper page
  29. J. R. McClean, S. Boixo, V. N. Smelyanskiy, R. Babbush, and H. Neven, "Barren plateaus in quantum neural network training landscapes," Nat. Commun., vol. 9, no. 1, 2018, Art. no. 4812, doi: 10.1038/s41467-018- 07090-4. · DOI · Paper page
  30. A. J. McCaskey et al., "Quantum chemistry as a benchmark for near-term quantum computers," npj Quantum Inform., vol. 5, 2019, Art. no. 99, doi: 10.1038/s41534-019-0209-0. · DOI
  31. C. Hempel et al., "Quantum chemistry calculations on a trapped-ion quan- tum simulator," Phys. Rev. X, vol. 8, no. 3, 2018, Art. no. 031022, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevX.8.031022. · DOI
  32. J. Lee, W. J. Huggins, M. Head-Gordon, and K. B. Whaley, "Gener- alized unitary coupled cluster wave functions for quantum computa- tion," J. Chem. Theory Comput., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 311-324, 2018, doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b01004. · DOI · Paper page
  33. J. Schwinger, "Unitary operator bases," Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 570-579, 1960, doi: 10.1073/PNAS.46.4.570. · DOI
  34. A. Klappenecker and M. Rötteler, "Constructions of mutually unbiased bases," in Proc. Int. Conf. Finite Fields Appl., 2003, pp. 137-144, doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-24633-6_10. · DOI · Paper page
  35. A. Jena, S. Genin, and M. Mosca, "Pauli partitioning with respect to gate sets," 2019, arXiv:1907.07859. · arXiv
  36. V. Verteletskyi, T.-C. Yen, and A. F. Izmaylov, "Measurement optimization in the variational quantum eigensolver using a minimum clique cover," J. Chem. Phys., vol. 152, 2020, Art. no. 124114, doi: 10.1063/1.5141458. · DOI · Paper page
  37. T.-C. Yen, V. Verteletskyi, and A. F. Izmaylov, "Measuring all compatible operators in one series of single-qubit measurements using unitary trans- formations," J. Chem. Theory Comput., vol. 16, pp. 2400-2409, 2020, doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00008. · DOI · Paper page
  38. A. F. Izmaylov, T.-C. Yen, R. A. Lang, and V. Verteletskyi, "Unitary parti- tioning approach to the measurement problem in the variational quantum eigensolver method," J. Chem. Theory Comput., vol. 16, pp. 190-195, 2020, doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00791. · DOI · Paper page
  39. J. R. McClean, J. Romero, R. Babbush, and A. Aspuru-Guzik, "The theory of variational hybrid quantum-classical algorithms," New J. Phys., vol. 18, no. 2, 2016, Art. no. 023023, doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/18/2/023023. · DOI · Paper page
  40. A. Kandala et al., "Hardware-efficient variational quantum eigensolver for small molecules and quantum magnets," Nature, vol. 549, no. 7671, pp. 242-246, 2017, doi: 10.1038/nature23879. · DOI · Paper page
  41. Y. Nam et al., "Ground-state energy estimation of the water molecule on a trapped-ion quantum computer," npj Quantum Inform., vol. 6, 2020, Art. no. 33, doi: 10.1038/s41534-020-0259-3. · DOI
  42. C. Kokail et al., "Self-verifying variational quantum simulation of the lattice Schwinger model," Nature, vol. 569, 2019, Art. no. 355, doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1177-4. · DOI · Paper page
  43. R. S. Smith, M. J. Curtis, and W. J. Zeng, "A practical quantum instruction set architecture," 2016, arXiv:1608.03355. · arXiv
  44. S. Bravyi, J. M. Gambetta, A. Mezzacapo, and K. Temme, "Tapering off qubits to simulate fermionic Hamiltonians," 2017, arXiv:1701.08213. · arXiv
  45. A. F. Izmaylov, T.-C. Yen, and I. G. Ryabinkin, "Revising the measure- ment process in the variational quantum eigensolver: Is it possible to reduce the number of separately measured operators?," Chem. Sci., vol. 10, 2019, Art. no. 3746, doi: 10.1039/c8sc05592k. · DOI
  46. B. Moseley, M. Osborne, and S. Benjamin, "Bayesian optimisation for variational quantum eigensolvers," Quantum, vol. 3, pp. 4-5, 2018.
  47. Y. Shi et al., "Optimized compilation of aggregated instructions for realis- tic quantum computers," in Proc. 24th Int. Conf. Archit. Support Program. Lang. Oper. Syst., 2019, pp. 1031-1044, doi: 10.1145/3297858.3304018. · DOI
  48. P. Gokhale et al., "Partial compilation of variational algorithms for noisy intermediate-scale quantum machines," in Proc. 52nd Annu. IEEE/ACM Int. Symp. Microarchit., 2019, pp. 266-278, doi: 10.1145/3352460.3358313. · DOI
  49. P.-L. Dallaire-Demers, J. Romero, L. Veis, S. Sim, and A. Aspuru-Guzik, "Low-depth circuit ansatz for preparing correlated fermionic states on a quantum computer," Quantum Sci. Technol., vol. 4, 2019, Art. no. 045005, doi: 10.1088/2058-9565%2FAB3951. · DOI · Paper page
  50. M. Otten and S. K. Gray, "Accounting for errors in quantum algorithms via individual error reduction," npj Quantum Inform., vol. 5, no. 1, 2019, Art. no. 11, doi: 10.1038/s41534-019-0125-3. · DOI
  51. W. M. Kirby and P. J. Love, "Contextuality test of the in the variational quantum eigensolver," Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 123, 2019, Art. no. 200501.
  52. R. M. Karp, "Reducibility among combinatorial problems," in Complex- ity of Computer Computations. New York, NY, USA: Springer, 1972, pp. 85-103, doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-68279-0_8. · DOI
  53. D. Zuckerman, "Linear degree extractors and the inapproximability of max clique and chromatic number," in Proc. 38th Annu. ACM Symp. Theory Comput., 2006, pp. 681-690, doi: 10.1145/1132516.1132612. · DOI
  54. M. Planat and M. Saniga, "On the Pauli graphs of N-qudits," 2017, arXiv:quant-ph/0701211. · arXiv
  55. R. Boppana and M. M. Halldórsson, "Approximating maximum inde- pendent sets by excluding subgraphs," BIT Numer. Math., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 180-196, 1992, doi: 10.1007/3-540-52846-6_74. · DOI
  56. A. Hagberg, P. Swart, and D. S Chult, "Exploring network structure, dynamics, and function using networkX," in Proc. 7th Python Sci. Conf., 2008, pp. 11-15.
  57. C. Bron and J. Kerbosch, "Algorithm 457: Finding all cliques of an undi- rected graph," Commun. ACM, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 575-577, 1973, doi: 10.1145/362342.362367. · DOI
  58. J. D. Whitfield, J. Biamonte, and A. Aspuru-Guzik, "Simulation of elec- tronic structure Hamiltonians using quantum computers," Mol. Phys., vol. 109, no. 5, pp. 735-750, 2011, doi: 10.1080/00268976.2011.552441. · DOI · Paper page
  59. Z. Baranyai, "On the factorization of the complete uniform hypergraphs," in Infinite and Finite Sets, A. Hanaj, R. Rado, and V. T. Sós, Eds., Colloq. Math. Soc. Janos Bolyai, 1974, pp. 91-108.
  60. R. F. Bailey and B. Stevens, "Hamiltonian decompositions of complete k-uniform hypergraphs," Discr. Math., vol. 310, no. 22, pp. 3088-3095, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.disc.2009.03.047. · DOI
  61. N. Deo and P. Micikevicius, "On one-factorization of complete 3-uniform hypergraphs," Congressus Numerantium, vol. 158, pp. 153-162, 2002.
  62. A. Brouwer and A. Schrijver, "Uniform hypergraphs," in Packing and Cov- ering in Combinatorics, A. Schrijver, Ed. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Stichting Mathematisch Centrum, 1979, pp. 39-93.
  63. L. Ford and D. Fulkerson, "Maximal flow through a network," in Clas- sic Papers in Combinatorics. New York, NY, USA: Springer, 1954, pp. 243-248, doi: 10.1007/978-0-8176-4842-8. · DOI
  64. E. Cohen, "Approximate max-flow on small depth networks," SIAM J. Comput., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 579-597, 1995, doi: 10.1137/S0097539792236717. · DOI
  65. A. Madry, "Navigating central path with electrical flows: From flows to matchings, and back," in Proc. IEEE 54th Annu. Symp. Foundations Comput Sci., 2013, pp. 253-262, doi: 10.1109/FOCS.2013.35. · DOI
  66. Y. T. Lee, S. Rao, and N. Srivastava, "A new approach to computing maximum flows using electrical flows," in Proc. 40th Annu. ACM Symp. Theory Comput., 2013, pp. 755-764, doi: 10.1145/2488608.2488704. · DOI
  67. D. Kang and J. Payor, "Flow rounding," 2015, arXiv:1507.08139. · arXiv
  68. K. Gui et al., "Term grouping and travelling salesperson for digital quan- tum simulation," 2020, arXiv:2001.05983. · arXiv
  69. C. M. Dawson and M. A. Nielsen, "The Solovay-Kitaev algorithm," 2005, arXiv:quant-ph/0505030. · arXiv
  70. N. Khaneja and S. Glaser, "Cartan decomposition of SU(2 n ), construc- tive controllability of spin systems and universal quantum computing," Chem. Phys., vol. 267, no. 13, pp. 11-23, Jun. 2001, doi: 10.1016/S0301- 0104%2801%2900318-4. · DOI
  71. N. J. Ross, "Optimal ancilla-free Pauli+ v approximation of z-rotations," 2014, arXiv:1409.4355. · arXiv
  72. C.-K. Li, R. Roberts, and X. Yin, "Decomposition of unitary matrices and quantum gates," Int. J. Quantum Inform., vol. 11, no. 1, 2013, Art. no. 1350015, doi: 10.1142/S0219749913500159. · DOI
  73. A. Daskin and S. Kais, "Decomposition of unitary matrices for finding quantum circuits: application to molecular Hamiltonians," J. Chem. Phys., vol. 134, no. 14, 2011, Art. no. 144112, doi: 10.1063/1.3575402. · DOI
  74. Y. Nakajima, Y. Kawano, and H. Sekigawa, "A new algorithm for pro- ducing quantum circuits using KAK decompositions," 2005, arXiv:quant- ph/0509196.
  75. D. Gottesman, "Stabilizer codes and quantum error correction," Ph.D. dissertation, Phys., Math. Astron., California Inst. Technol., Pasadena, CA, USA, 1997, doi: 10.7907/RZR7-DT72. · DOI · Paper page
  76. S. Aaronson and D. Gottesman, "Improved simulation of stabilizer circuits," Phys. Rev. A, vol. 70, no. 5, 2004, Art. no. 052328, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.70.052328. · DOI · Paper page
  77. U. Seyfarth, and K. S. Ranade, "Construction of mutually unbiased bases with cyclic symmetry for qubit systems," Phys. Rev. A, vol. 84, no. 4, 2011, Art. no. 042327, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.84.042327. · DOI
  78. U. Seyfarth, "Cyclic mutually unbiased bases and quantum public-key encryption," 2019, arXiv:1907.02726. · arXiv
  79. Y.-C. Zheng, C.-Y. Lai, T. A. Brun, and L.-C. Kwek, "Depth reduc- tion for quantum Clifford circuits through Pauli measurements," 2018, arXiv:1805.12082. · arXiv
  80. R. W. Farebrother, Linear Least Squares Computations. New York, NY, USA: Marcel Dekker, 1988, doi: 10.1201/9780203748923. · DOI
  81. P. K. Barkoutsos et al., "Quantum algorithms for electronic structure calculations: Particle-hole Hamiltonian and optimized wave-function ex- pansions," Phys. Rev. A, vol. 98, no. 2, 2018, Art. no. 022322, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.98.022322. · DOI · Paper page
  82. E. F. Dumitrescu et al., "Cloud quantum computing of an atomic nu- cleus," Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 120, no. 21, 2018, Art. no. 210501, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.210501. · DOI · Paper page
  83. K. Życzkowski, P. Horodecki, A. Sanpera, and M. Lewenstein, "Volume of the set of separable states," Phys. Rev. A, vol. 58, no. 2, 1998, Art. no. 883, doi: 10.1103/PHYSREVA.58.883. · DOI
  84. N. J. Russell, L. Chakhmakhchyan, J. L. OBrien, and A. Laing, "Direct dialling of haar random unitary matrices," New J. Phys., vol. 19, no. 3, 2017, Art. no. 033007, doi: 10.1088/1367-2630%2Faa60ed. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gokhale, P., & Chong, F. T.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2019
Volume
1
Pages
1-24
ISSN
2689-1808 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1908.11857
arXiv
1908.11857
OpenAlex
W2971147839
Cited by
104
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 7
FWCI
5.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1818914, DE-AC02–06CH11357, 1730082, 1730449)
  • U.S. Department of Defense
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DE‐ AC02‐06CH11357, AC02‐06CH11357, 06CH11357, DE-AC02-)
  • Office of Science (AC02‐06CH11357, DE-AC02, 06CH11357, DE-AC02-06CH11357)
  • National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate
  • National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka (CCF-1730449/1730082)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Keywords
variational quantum eigensolver, measurement cost, fermionic Hamiltonians, round robin scheduling, flow networks, simultaneous measurement, ground state energy estimation, deuteron, molecular Hamiltonian, quantum circuit construction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review