The DOI matches its DataCite record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Deepfake Detection Challenge (DFDC) Preview Dataset
Open accessAbstract
In this paper, we introduce a preview of the Deepfakes Detection Challenge (DFDC) dataset consisting of 5K videos featuring two facial modification algorithms. A data collection campaign has been carried out where participating actors have entered into an agreement to the use and manipulation of their likenesses in our creation of the dataset. Diversity in several axes (gender, skin-tone, age, etc.) has been considered and actors recorded videos with arbitrary backgrounds thus bringing visual variability. Finally, a set of specific metrics to evaluate the performance have been defined and two existing models for detecting deepfakes have been tested to provide a reference performance baseline. The DFDC dataset preview can be downloaded at: deepfakedetectionchallenge.ai
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“It does not indicate whether the visual component or speech is manipulated in the video.”
From Attention-based Multimodal learning framework for Generalized Audio-Visual Deepfake Detection (2023) · cites this paper as [9]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“DFDC-preview is the initial version of the DFDC dataset containing 1131 real videos and 4119 manipulated videos and is available on Kaggle.”
From Attention-based Multimodal learning framework for Generalized Audio-Visual Deepfake Detection (2023) · cites this paper as [9]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“DFDC [52] (DeepFake Detection Challenge) is a multimodal deepfake dataset comprising nearly 120,000 videos, of which 100,000 are labeled as fake and the remaining as real.”
From Deepfake Media Forensics: Status and Future Challenges (2025) · cites this paper as [52]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“For instance, DFDC [37] has a 3:1 ratio of fake to real videos, while CelebDF [38] has nearly 5 times more fake videos.”
From Deepfake detection across image, video, and audio: a comprehensive survey with empirical evaluation of generalization and robustness (2026) · cites this paper as [37]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This poses an additional challenge since there is a lack of multimodal deepfake datasets proposed in the literature, while monomodal ones are widely available.”
From A Robust Approach to Multimodal Deepfake Detection (2023) · cites this paper as [42]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In the recent years, few multimodal datasets have been proposed, containing both counterfeited video and audio tracks.”
From A Robust Approach to Multimodal Deepfake Detection (2023) · cites this paper as [42]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The DFDC dataset scaled data collection to over 100,000 clips from paid actors with explicit consent, offering a large training and evaluation substrate and reporting generalization considerations from a major public challenge [35].”
From A Review of Tools and Technologies to Combat Deepfakes (2026) · cites this paper as [35]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Foundational benchmarks have been instrumental in advancing the accuracy of deepfake detectors.”
From From Black Boxes to Glass Boxes: Explainable AI for Trustworthy Deepfake Forensics (2025) · cites this paper as [49]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The DFDC dataset is currently the largest available deepfake detection dataset containing around 100,000 manipulated videos and 23,000 original samples having 960 different identities.”
From Attention-based Multimodal learning framework for Generalized Audio-Visual Deepfake Detection (2023) · cites this paper as [9]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The dataset includes both manipulated audios and videos, however, labels the entire video as fake.”
From Attention-based Multimodal learning framework for Generalized Audio-Visual Deepfake Detection (2023) · cites this paper as [9]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“It includes thousands of video files labeled as real or fake, featuring diverse facial characteristics, expressions, and angles.”
From Enhancing Deepfake Detection Through Quantum Transfer Learning and Class-Attention Vision Transformer Architecture (2025) · cites this paper as [17]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“During the validation, it was clearly observed that when log-WP was maximized over each fold, the recall reminder was at the optimal level, that is -3.044 for TamperNet, -2.14 for XceptionNet (face), and -3.352 for XceptionNet (Full), respectively.”
From A Comprehensive Review of DeepFake Detection Using Advanced Machine Learning and Fusion Methods (2023) · cites this paper as [15]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“DeepFakes Detection Challenge Preview (DFDC Preview) (Dolhansky et al. 2019) dataset consisting of 5K videos with two facial modification algorithms.”
From Countering Malicious DeepFakes: Survey, Battleground, and Horizon (2022) · cites this paper as Dolhansky et al. 2019
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Visual modality datasets dominate with over 20 publicly available resources [29, 30, 30-44], while audio modality datasets are fewer, with 11 notable datasets [45-55].”
From Deepfake detection across image, video, and audio: a comprehensive survey with empirical evaluation of generalization and robustness (2026) · cites this paper as [37]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The details of the algorithms used for manipulation are not revealed.”
From Attention-based Multimodal learning framework for Generalized Audio-Visual Deepfake Detection (2023) · cites this paper as [9]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, the DFDC dataset is one of the largest and most diverse datasets used for deepfake detection.”
From Enhancing Deepfake Detection Through Quantum Transfer Learning and Class-Attention Vision Transformer Architecture (2025) · cites this paper as [17]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Additionally, the synthetic audios are not lip-synced with the corresponding videos and are labeled as fake even if the original voice is replaced with a different person's voice.”
From Attention-based Multimodal learning framework for Generalized Audio-Visual Deepfake Detection (2023) · cites this paper as [9]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
FaceForensics++: Learning to Detect Manipulated Facial Images
Rossler, A., Cozzolino, D., Verdoliva, L., Riess, C., Thies, J., & Niessner, M. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00009 · Cited by 3,314
Deep Fakes: A Looming Challenge for Privacy, Democracy, and National Security
Chesney, R., & Citron, D. K. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3213954 · Cited by 880
FaceForensics: A Large-scale Video Dataset for Forgery Detection in Human Faces
Rössler, A., Cozzolino, D., Verdoliva, L., Riess, C., Thies, J., & Nießner, M. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1803.09179 · Cited by 339
Artificial Intelligence, Deepfakes and a Future of Ectypes
Floridi, L. (2018) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-018-0325-3 · Cited by 203
Celeb-DF: A New Dataset for DeepFake ForensicsPreprint
Li, Y., Yang, X., Sun, P., Qi, H., & Lyu, S. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 91
Development of a video tampering dataset for forensic investigation
Al-Sanjary, O. I., Ahmed, A. A., & Sulong, G. (2016) · Forensic Science International · doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.07.013 · Cited by 77
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–431 of 431
A Novel Methodology For Crowdsourcing AI Models in an EnterprisePreprint
Suryanarayanan, P., Saranathan, S., Mahatma, S., & Pathak, D. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.14033
Detection of Malicious Spatial-Domain Steganography Over Noisy Channels
Prasad, S. S., Hadar, O., & Polian, I. (2021) · Advances in information security, privacy, and ethics book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-7160-6.ch006
Estado del arte en generación y detección de contenido sintético. Limitaciones y oportunidades
Boza, M. H., & Pablos, J. I. E. (2021) · Colección Jornadas y congresos · doi:10.18239/jornadas_2021.34.37
One Shot Face Swapping on MegapixelsPreprint
Zhu, Y., Li, Q., Wang, J., Xu, C., & Sun, Z. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2105.04932
Challenges and Solutions in DeepFakesPreprint
Sharma, J., & Sharma, S. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.05397 · Cited by 1
Analyses of Algorithms to Detect DeepFake VideosPreprint
Kumar, G. (2023) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.22032113
Analyses of Algorithms to Detect DeepFake VideosPreprint
Kumar, G. (2023) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.22032113.v1 · Cited by 1
SURVEY ON GUARDING AUTHENTICITY: “DEEPVISION’S EYE BLINK PATTERN ANALYSIS FOR DEEPFAKE DETECTION”
(2023) · International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science · doi:10.56726/irjmets46024
Image and video generation via deep learning
Jiang, L. (2023) · doi:10.32657/10356/172067
Research on robustness evaluation and verification for facial deepfake detection
Liu, S., Chen, J.-R., Chen, W., & Li, J. (2023) · International Conference on Compute and Data Analysis (ICCDA) · doi:10.1145/3629264.3629268
Transfer-Learning and YOLO V7 Hybridised for Human Cropping for Deepfake Detection Algorithms
Waqas, N., Safie, S. I., Kadir, K., Khan, S., & Khan, A. A. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Smart Instrumentation, Measurement and Applications (ICSIMA) · doi:10.1109/icsima59853.2023.10373432
Classifying Negative Objects With Neural Networks
Hooper, K. (2024) · doi:10.32920/25190984.v1
Classifying Negative Objects With Neural Networks
Hooper, K. (2024) · doi:10.32920/25190984
DeepFake Image Detection Using Adaptive Discriminator Augmentation (ADA)
Talib, D. A., & Abed, A. A. (2023) · International Conference on Advanced Engineering and Technologies (ICONNIC) · doi:10.1109/iconnic59854.2023.10467610
Video Morphing Attack Detection Using Convolutional Neural Networks On Deep Fake Detection Algorithm
Boovaneswari, S., & RS, S. N. (2024) · doi:10.53555/kuey.v30i5.3495
DL MODEL FOR IMITATION FALSE FACE, AGE, GENDER AND SCENARIO DISPARITIES
Tabassum, I., Shubhangi, D. C., Gadgay, B., & Tanveer, S. (2024) · INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTER RESEARCH · doi:10.47191/ijmcr/v12i6.04
A comprehensive survey of detecting deepfakes techniques
Maske, D., Munot, S., Mugut, A., & Mundada, G. (2024) · AIP conference proceedings · doi:10.1063/5.0228224
Three Fakes With Deep Learning Techniques Fake News, Fake Reviewers, and Deepfakes
Boongasame, L. (2024) · Advances in human and social aspects of technology book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-7914-1.ch007
Deepfake Multi-Faces Detection Using Haar Cascades with Sift Matching AlgorithmPreprint
Al-Sanjary, O. I., Ahmed, A. A., & Al-Qaba, A. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5134415
Efficient net-based deep learning: A deep-fake image detection
Singh, R., Sharma, D. K., & Jain, P. K. (2024) · International Conference on Communication, Control and Intelligent Systems (CCIS) · doi:10.1109/ccis63231.2024.10931956
Patch, Spectral and Eye Pattern based Deepfake Video Detection
Rajalakshmi, B., Sunjay, K. S., Thakshinathan, M., & Thejashri, S. (2025) · International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Social Networking (ICPCSN) · doi:10.1109/icpcsn65854.2025.11035802
Deepfake Manipulation on Social Media: A Case Study of Fraudulent Activities in Türkiye
Söğütlüler, T. (2025) · Intermedia International e-journal · doi:10.56133/intermedia.1614843 · Cited by 1
Leveraging Transfer Learning for An Automated DeepFake Detection System
Rawat, A., Chauhan, A., Dabral, S., Patwal, J., & Tamanna, T. (2025) · International Conference on Inventive Research in Computing Applications (ICIRCA) · doi:10.1109/icirca65293.2025.11089829
Representation Alignment For Deepfake Detection
Li, Z., Tang, W., Gao, S., Wang, Y., & Wang, S. (2025) · International Conference on Computing and Artificial Intelligence (ICCAI) · doi:10.1109/iccai66501.2025.00109
DEVision: A Lightweight Model for Deepfake Video DetectionPreprint
Ghosh, P. S., Paul, R., Koley, S., Kumar, P., Sarkar, D., Chowdhury, R., & Goto, T. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5472931
ARES: Autonomous Real-time Evaluation SystemPreprint
Singh, G. (2025) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-6973364/v1
Assessing the visual realism of deepfake videos: an IQA-based approach
Demir, A., Dırık, A. E., & Vatansever, S. (2026) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.3893
DualFocusNet: Dual-Stream Spatio-Temporal Transformer for Generalizable Deepfake Detection
Kaddar, B., Serra-Sagrista, J. S., Sánchez, V., Marini, M. R., & Fontana, F. (2026) · ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and Applications · doi:10.1145/3820378
Learning Invariant and Discriminative Representations for Cross-Domain Deepfake Detection
Tang, W., Gao, S., Li, Z., Huang, Z., & Wang, S. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-92-3441-7_41
DeepRhythm: Exposing DeepFakes with Attentional Visual Heartbeat Rhythms
Qi, H., Guo, Q., Juefei-Xu, F., Xie, X., Ma, L., Feng, W., Liu, Y., & Zhao, J. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.07634 · Cited by 280
Generalized zero and few-shot transfer for facial forgery detection
Aneja, S., & Nießner, M. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.11863 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Dolhansky, B., Howes, R., Pflaum, B., Baram, N., & Ferrer, C. C.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1910.08854
- OpenAlex
- W2980459401
- Cited by
- 413
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 94 · 2023: 79 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 85 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 3
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
- Keywords
- deepfake detection, DFDC, face manipulation, synthetic video, video forensics, evaluation metrics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
