PreprintCited by 486Adversarial Robustness in Machine LearningSecurity and Verification in ComputingDigital Media Forensic Detection

On Adaptive Attacks to Adversarial Example Defenses

Open access
Tramer, Florian, Carlini, Nicholas, Brendel, Wieland, Madry, Aleksander·2020·arXiv

Abstract

Adaptive attacks have (rightfully) become the de facto standard for evaluating defenses to adversarial examples. We find, however, that typical adaptive evaluations are incomplete. We demonstrate that thirteen defenses recently published at ICLR, ICML and NeurIPS---and chosen for illustrative and pedagogical purposes---can be circumvented despite attempting to perform evaluations using adaptive attacks. While prior evaluation papers focused mainly on the end result---showing that a defense was ineffective---this paper focuses on laying out the methodology and the approach necessary to perform an adaptive attack. We hope that these analyses will serve as guidance on how to properly perform adaptive attacks against defenses to adversarial examples, and thus will allow the community to make further progress in building more robust models.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2002.08347

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

6 of the 57 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Bafna, M., Murtagh, J., and Vyas, N. Thwarting adversarial examples: An l0-robust sparse fourier transform. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , pp. 10096-10106, 2018.
  2. Chen, P.-Y., Zhang, H., Sharma, Y., Yi, J., and Hsieh, C.-J. Zoo: Zeroth order optimization based black-box attacks to deep neural networks without training substitute models. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Security , pp. 15-26, 2017.
  3. Dhillon, G. S., Azizzadenesheli, K., Lipton, Z. C., Bernstein, J. D., Kossaifi, J., Khanna, A., and Anandkumar, A. Stochastic activation pruning for robust adversarial defense. In International Conference on Learning Representations , 2018.
  4. Madry, A., Makelov, A., Schmidt, L., Tsipras, D., and Vladu, A. Towards deep learning models resistant to adversarial attacks. International Conference on Learning Representations , 2017.
  5. Sabour, S., Cao, Y., Faghri, F., and Fleet, D. J. Adversarial manipulation of deep representations. International Conference on Learning Representations , 2016.
  6. Szegedy, C., Zaremba, W., Sutskever, I., Bruna, J., Erhan, D., Goodfellow, I., and Fergus, R. Intriguing properties of neural networks. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , 2014.
  7. Tramèr, F. and Boneh, D. Adversarial training and robustness for multiple perturbations. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , pp. 5858-5868, 2019.
  8. Yang, Y., Zhang, G., Katabi, D., and Xu, Z. Me-net: Towards effective adversarial robustness with matrix estimation. In International Conference on Machine Learning , pp. 7025-7034, 2019a.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tramer, F., Carlini, N., Brendel, W., & Madry, A.
Affiliations
  • Google (United States) (US)
  • University of Tübingen (DE)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2020
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3007305010
Cited by
486
References
57
Citations by year
2025: 31 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 75 · 2022: 76 · 2021: 164 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 3
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Security and Verification in Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
Keywords
adversarial examples, adaptive attacks, robustness, adversarial robustness, machine learning security

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review