Cited by 682Adversarial Robustness in Machine LearningDigital Media Forensic DetectionPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data

Backdoor Learning: A Survey

Open access
Li, Yiming, Jiang, Yong, Li, Zhifeng, Xia, Shu-Tao·2024·IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems

Abstract

Backdoor attack intends to embed hidden backdoors into deep neural networks (DNNs), so that the attacked models perform well on benign samples, whereas their predictions will be maliciously changed if the hidden backdoor is activated by attacker-specified triggers. This threat could happen when the training process is not fully controlled, such as training on third-party datasets or adopting third-party models, which poses a new and realistic threat. Although backdoor learning is an emerging and rapidly growing research area, there is still no comprehensive and timely review of it. In this article, we present the first comprehensive survey of this realm. We summarize and categorize existing backdoor attacks and defenses based on their characteristics, and provide a unified framework for analyzing poisoning-based backdoor attacks. Besides, we also analyze the relation between backdoor attacks and relevant fields (i.e., adversarial attacks and data poisoning), and summarize widely adopted benchmark datasets. Finally, we briefly outline certain future research directions relying upon reviewed works. A curated list of backdoor-related resources is also available at https://github.com/THUYimingLi/backdoor-learning-resources.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tnnls.2022.3182979

Cites

194 of 194 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, Y., Jiang, Y., Li, Z., & Xia, S.-T.
Affiliations
  • Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School (CN)
  • Peng Cheng Laboratory (CN)
  • Tencent (China) (CN)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
Published
2024-01
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
5-22
ISSN
  • 2162-237X (ISSN-L)
  • 2162-2388
OpenAlex
W3042368254
Cited by
682
References
194
Citations by year
2026: 130 · 2025: 185 · 2024: 160 · 2023: 123 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 7
FWCI
42.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (62171248)
  • PCNL Key Project (PCL2021A07)
  • Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Commission (Research Center for Computer Network
  • Tencent Rhino-Bird Research Program
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Keywords
backdoor attacks, deep neural network, data poisoning, backdoor defense, adversarial attacks, backdoor triggers, benchmark dataset

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review