The DOI matches its DataCite record; 28 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Semi-supervised Graph Attentive Network for Financial Fraud Detection
Open accessAbstract
With the rapid growth of financial services, fraud detection has been a very important problem to guarantee a healthy environment for both users and providers. Conventional solutions for fraud detection mainly use some rule-based methods or distract some features manually to perform prediction. However, in financial services, users have rich interactions and they themselves always show multifaceted information. These data form a large multiview network, which is not fully exploited by conventional methods. Additionally, among the network, only very few of the users are labelled, which also poses a great challenge for only utilizing labeled data to achieve a satisfied performance on fraud detection. To address the problem, we expand the labeled data through their social relations to get the unlabeled data and propose a semi-supervised attentive graph neural network, namedSemiGNN to utilize the multi-view labeled and unlabeled data for fraud detection. Moreover, we propose a hierarchical attention mechanism to better correlate different neighbors and different views. Simultaneously, the attention mechanism can make the model interpretable and tell what are the important factors for the fraud and why the users are predicted as fraud. Experimentally, we conduct the prediction task on the users of Alipay, one of the largest third-party online and offline cashless payment platform serving more than 4 hundreds of million users in China. By utilizing the social relations and the user attributes, our method can achieve a better accuracy compared with the state-of-the-art methods on two tasks. Moreover, the interpretable results also give interesting intuitions regarding the tasks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Semi-supervised node-level HGNN approaches exploit partial labels but are constrained by the quality and distribution of labels.
“Semi-supervised approaches exploit partial labels but are constrained by the quality and distribution of labels.”
From A Survey of Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks for Cybersecurity Anomaly Detection (2025) · cites this paper as [68]
The SemiGNN section (p. 5) says the model uses labeled and unlabeled users and that having only a small portion of users labeled makes it difficult to learn a good classifier. This supports a constraint from limited labels, but the paper does not establish that label quality or label distribution constrains the approach. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredSemiGNN uses hierarchical attention over metapath-defined subgraphs for fraud detection.
“SemiGNN [68] uses hierarchical attention over metapathdefined subgraphs for fraud detection”
From A Survey of Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks for Cybersecurity Anomaly Detection (2025) · cites this paper as [68]
The Introduction (p. 2) and SemiGNN section (p. 3) describe hierarchical node-level and view-level attention for fraud detection. But the paper describes its views as social-relation and attribute graphs, not metapath-defined subgraphs; the Dataset section (p. 6) details how those graphs are built. (LLM, conf=0.89)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredSemiGNN leverages both labeled and unlabeled nodes and incorporates hierarchical attention over metapath-based subgraphs, making it well-suited for access fraud scenarios where only partial labels are available and fraud behaviors differ across user roles and access types.
“SemiGNN [68] introduces a semi-supervised graph attention network designed for fraud detection in financial systems. It leverages both labeled and unlabeled nodes and incorporates hierarchical attention over metapath-based subgraphs. This makes it well-suited for access fraud scenarios where only partial labels are available and fraud behaviors differ across user roles and access types.”
From A Survey of Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks for Cybersecurity Anomaly Detection (2025) · cites this paper as [68]
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredOperational environments demand reliability, interpretability, and maintainability.
“Operational environments further demand reliability, interpretability, and maintainability [68].”
From A Survey of Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks for Cybersecurity Anomaly Detection (2025) · cites this paper as [68]
The Introduction (p. 1) says financial-service providers and supervisors require interpretable fraud-detection models, supporting the interpretability part of the claim. The passages found on deployment and efficiency (p. 6) do not establish that operational environments demand reliability or maintainability. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946 · cited 1×
“In our model SemiGNN, we randomly initialize parameters and optimize the model with Adam [14].”
MethodXGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2939672.2939785 · Cited by 54,569 · cited 1×
“• Xgboost [28]: It is a tree-based model, which is very”
BackgroundSemi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks
Kipf, T. N., & Welling, M. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1609.02907 · Cited by 24,853 · cited 3×
“• GCN [24]: It is a deep graph neural network and each node’s embedding is ensembled by its own embedding”
BackgroundMethodVeličković, P., Cucurull, G., Casanova, A., Romero, A., Liò, P., & Bengio, Y. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1710.10903 · Cited by 12,107
node2vec: Scalable Feature Learning for Networks
Grover, A., & Leskovec, J. (2016) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2939672.2939754 · Cited by 10,926 · cited 1×
“DeepWalk [16] and Node2vec [17] propose to use the random walk and skip-gram to learn the node representations.”
MethodDeepWalk: online learning of social representations
Perozzi, B., Al-Rfou, R., & Skiena, S. (2014) · Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/2623330.2623732 · Cited by 10,123
LINE: Large-scale Information Network Embedding
Tang, J., Qu, M., Wang, M., Zhang, M., Yan, J., & Mei, Q. (2015) · Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/2736277.2741093 · Cited by 5,416 · cited 6×
“LINE [18] and SDNE [19] propose explicit objective functions for preserving first-and second-order proximity.”
MethodInfluentialMultimodal Deep LearningPreprint
Akkus, C., Chu, L.-Y., Djakovic, V., Jauch-Walser, S., Koch, P., Loss, G., Marquardt, C., Moldovan, M., Sauter, N., Schneider, M., et al. (2011) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2301.04856 · Cited by 3,745 · cited 2×
“Through several layers of non-linear functions to map the raw data into the high-level semantic space, it is easier to correlate multiview data [27].”
BackgroundStructural Deep Network Embedding
Wang, D., Cui, P., & Zhu, W. (2016) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2939672.2939753 · Cited by 2,845 · cited 1×
“LINE [18] and SDNE [19] propose explicit objective functions for preserving first-and second-order proximity.”
BackgroundSelf-citationLearning Convolutional Neural Networks for GraphsPreprint
Niepert, M., Ahmed, M., & Kutzkov, K. (2016) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1605.05273 · Cited by 2,315 · cited 1×
“Recently, graph convolution network based methods are very popular [24], [25].”
MethodDong, Y., Chawla, N. V., & Swami, A. (2017) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3097983.3098036 · Cited by 2,283 · cited 2×
“Then some further works like Metapath2vec [22] , HNE [23] are proposed to consider both the network topology”
BackgroundCao, S., Lu, W., & Xu, Q. (2015) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/2806416.2806512 · Cited by 1,602 · cited 1×
“Some further works [20], [21] use the matrix factorization to factorize high-order relation matrix.”
MethodAsymmetric Transitivity Preserving Graph Embedding
Ou, M.-D., Cui, P., Pei, J., Zhang, Z., & Zhu, W.-W. (2016) · Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2939672.2939751 · Cited by 1,343 · cited 1×
“Some further works [20], [21] use the matrix factorization to factorize high-order relation matrix.”
MethodSelf-citationData mining for credit card fraud: a comparative study
Bhattacharyya, S., Jha, S., Tharakunnel, K., & Westland, J. C. (2011) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2010.08.008 · Cited by 1,108 · cited 2×
“Commonly, these methods first extract statistical features from different aspects like user’s profiles and historical behaviours and then use some classical classifiers like SVM [9], treebased methods [10] or neural networks [7], [8] to decide fraud or not.”
BackgroundMethodData Mining techniques for the detection of fraudulent financial statements
Kirkos, E., Spathis, C., & Manolopoulos, Y. (2007) · Expert systems with applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2006.02.016 · Cited by 760 · cited 2×
“[8] selects some personal variables regarding the financial distress, debt structure, need for continuing growth, accounts receivable and totally uses a 27-dimensional vector as the input to the decision tree, neural network and bayesian belief network.”
BackgroundMethodHeterogeneous Network Embedding via Deep Architectures
Chang, S.-Y., Han, W., Tang, J.-L., Qi, G.-J., Aggarwal, C., & Huang, T. S. (2015) · Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2783258.2783296 · Cited by 631 · cited 2×
“Then some further works like Metapath2vec [22] , HNE [23] are proposed to consider both the network topology”
BackgroundDetection of financial statement fraud and feature selection using data mining techniques
Ravisankar, P., Ravi, V., Rao, G., & Bose, I. (2011) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2010.11.006 · Cited by 564 · cited 4×
“[9] extracts some statistic features about assets, liabilities, incomes, debt and sales and uses a multi-layer feedforward network to do financial statement fraud detection.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialHeterogeneous Graph Neural Networks for Malicious Account Detection
Liu, Z.-Q., Chen, C., Yang, X., Zhou, J., Li, X.-L., & Song, L. (2018) · International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management · doi:10.1145/3269206.3272010 · Cited by 448 · cited 3×
“Then some following methods start to use graph embedding to incorporate the user interactions [5], [6].”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationA Recursive Partitioning Decision Rule for Nonparametric Classification
Friedman (1977) · IEEE transactions on computers · doi:10.1109/tc.1977.1674849 · Cited by 424 · cited 1×
“Specifically, financial scenario also concerns about the KS [15], which is a metric to measure the risk differentiation of the model.”
BackgroundTransaction aggregation as a strategy for credit card fraud detection
Whitrow, C., Hand, D. J., Juszczak, P., Weston, D., & Adams, N. M. (2009) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-008-0116-z · Cited by 337 · cited 1×
“Therefore, a great number of literatures have been studied on different types of the fraud, like financial statement fraud [7]– [9], credit card fraud [10], [11], insurance fraud [12], [13]”
BackgroundReal Time Credit Card Fraud Detection using Computational Intelligence
Quah, J. T. S., & Sriganesh, M. (2007) · 2007 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2007.08.093 · Cited by 335
Robust and Scalable Graph-Based Semisupervised Learning
Liu, W., Wang, J., & Chang, S. (2012) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2012.2197809 · Cited by 203 · cited 1×
“Our work is also related to the graph-based semi-supervised learning (GSSL) method [26].”
BackgroundHu, B.-B., Zhang, Z.-Q., Shi, C., Zhou, J., Li, X.-L., & Qi, Y. (2019) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v33i01.3301946 · Cited by 159 · cited 3×
“Then some following methods start to use graph embedding to incorporate the user interactions [5], [6].”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationA Review of Data Mining-Based Financial Fraud Detection Research
Yue, D.-M., Wu, X.-D., Wang, Y.-F., Li, Y., & Chu, C. (2007) · International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing · doi:10.1109/wicom.2007.1352 · Cited by 123 · cited 1×
“These methods make prediction mainly based on the statistical features of a certain user and use classical classifiers like logistic regression, neural networks to do classification [2]–[4].”
MethodStrategies for detecting fraudulent claims in the automobile insurance industry
Viaene, S., Ayuso, M., Guillén, M., Gheel, D. V., & Dedene, G. (2007) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2005.08.005 · Cited by 109 · cited 1×
“Therefore, a great number of literatures have been studied on different types of the fraud, like financial statement fraud [7]– [9], credit card fraud [10], [11], insurance fraud [12], [13]”
BackgroundA genetic algorithm approach to detecting temporal patterns indicative of financial statement fraud
Hoogs, B., Kiehl, T. R., LaComb, C., & Şentürk, D. (2007) · Intell. Syst. Account. Finance Manag. · doi:10.1002/isaf.284 · Cited by 82 · cited 1×
“These methods make prediction mainly based on the statistical features of a certain user and use classical classifiers like logistic regression, neural networks to do classification [2]–[4].”
MethodA Bayesian dichotomous model with asymmetric link for fraud in insurance
Bermúdez, L., Pérez, J. M., Ayuso, M., Gómez, E., & Vázquez, F. (2008) · Insurance Mathematics and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.insmatheco.2007.08.002 · Cited by 77 · cited 1×
“Therefore, a great number of literatures have been studied on different types of the fraud, like financial statement fraud [7]– [9], credit card fraud [10], [11], insurance fraud [12], [13] and so on.”
BackgroundIntelligent Financial Fraud Detection Practices: An Investigation
West, J., Bhattacharya, M., & Islam, M. R. (2014) · Security and Privacy in Communication Networks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-23802-9_16 · Cited by 48 · cited 1×
“Furthermore, rule-based methods are easy to be attacked [1].”
Method
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- [3][3] Quah, Jon TS, and M. Sriganesh. 'l 35.4 (2008): 1721-1732. -
- [7][7] Bose, I., and J. Wang. 'Data mining for detection of financial statement fraud in Chinese Companies.' International joint Conference on e-Commerce, e-Administration, e-Society, and e-Education. International Business Academics Consortium (IBAC) and Knowledge Association of Taiwan (KAT), 2007. -
- [21][21] Cao, Shaosheng, Wei Lu, and Qiongkai Xu. 'Grarep: Learning graph representations with global structural information.' Proceedings of the 24th ACM international on conference on information and knowledge management. ACM, 2015. -
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Anomaly Detection With Deep Learning
Ma, X., Wu, J. X., Xue, S., Yang, J. Y., Zhou, C., Sheng, Q. Z., Xiong, H., & Akoglu, L. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2021.3118815 · Cited by 932
“com/FraudDetection/FRAUDRE SemiGNN [111] Python Tensorflow Static Attributed Graph https://github.”
MethodEnhancing Graph Neural Network-based Fraud Detectors against Camouflaged Fraudsters
Dou, Y., Liu, Z., Sun, L., Deng, Y., Peng, H. M., & Yu, P. S. (2020) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3340531.3411903 · Cited by 725
Pick and Choose: A GNN-based Imbalanced Learning Approach for Fraud Detection
Liu, Y., Ao, X., Qin, Z., Chi, J., Feng, J., Yang, H., & He, Q. (2021) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3442381.3449989 · Cited by 530
“Semi-GNN [39] is a semi-supervised GNN model with hierarchical attention mechanism for explainable fraud prediction.”
BackgroundMethodRethinking Graph Neural Networks for Anomaly Detection
Tang, J.-H., Li, J.-J., Gao, Z.-C., & Li, J. (2022) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2205.15508 · Cited by 467
“That is, (1) applying attention mechanisms to correlate different neighbors through various views (Wang et al., 2019a; Cui et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2021a), (2) using the resampling strategy to aggregate neighborhood information selectively (Dou et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2020; 2021b), (3) designing…”
MethodAlleviating the Inconsistency Problem of Applying Graph Neural Network to Fraud Detection
Liu, Z., Dou, Y., Yu, P. S., Deng, Y., & Peng, H. (2020) · Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval · doi:10.1145/3397271.3401253 · Cited by 357
Addressing Heterophily in Graph Anomaly Detection: A Perspective of Graph Spectrum
Gao, Y., Wang, X., He, X.-N., Liu, Z., Feng, H.-M., & Zhang, Y.-D. (2023) · The Web Conference · doi:10.1145/3543507.3583268 · Cited by 252
“Semi-GNN and IHGAT [22] employ hierarchical attention mechanism for interpretable prediction, while based on camouflage behaviors and imbalanced problems, CARE-GNN and PC-GNN prune edges adaptively according to neighbor distribution.”
BackgroundMachine Learning for Financial Risk Management: A Survey
Mashrur, A., Luo, W., Zaidi, N. A., & Robles‐Kelly, A. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3036322 · Cited by 236
“posed by [183] can help learn better representations for fraud detection models.”
BackgroundFairness in Graph Mining: A Survey
Dong, Y., Ma, J., Wang, S., Chen, C., & Li, J. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2023.3265598 · Cited by 160
A Review on Graph Neural Network Methods in Financial Applications
Wang, J.-N., Zhang, S., Xiao, Y., & Song, R. (2021) · Journal of Data Science · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2111.15367 · Cited by 189
“, 2019) User-nickname graph Data Bipartite Loan (Wang et al., 2019) User-address graph Data Bipartite Loan (Wang et al.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialIntelligent financial fraud detection practices in post-pandemic era
Zhu, X., Ao, X., Qin, Z., Chang, Y., Liu, Y., He, Q., & Li, J. (2021) · The Innovation · doi:10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100176 · Cited by 238
“proposed a semi-supervised attentive GNN, named SemiGNN, which applies a hierarchical attention mechanism to correlate different neighbors and different views better.(75) The aforementioned heterogeneous GNNs reveal illegal acts through aggregating nodes’ neighborhood information across different relations.”
Dai, E., Aggarwal, C. C., & Wang, S. (2021) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3447548.3467364 · Cited by 102
“Graph structured data is very pervasive in real-world, such as social networks [9], financial transaction networks [37] and traffic networks [40].”
BackgroundH2-FDetector: A GNN-based Fraud Detector with Homophilic and Heterophilic Connections
Shi, F., Cao, Y., Shang, Y., Zhou, Y., Zhou, C., & Wu, J. (2022) · The Web Conference · doi:10.1145/3485447.3512195 · Cited by 185
“The existing self-attention mechanism[18, 29, 38] is essentially a sum of neighbor information and not suitable for heterophilic neighbor nodes.”
BackgroundeFraudCom: An E-commerce Fraud Detection System via Competitive Graph Neural Networks
Zhang, G., Li, Z., Huang, J., Wu, J., Zhou, C., Yang, J., & Gao, J. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3474379 · Cited by 177
“Fraud detection on e-commerce platforms: On e-commerce platforms, many fraud detection algorithms aim to detect financial criminals such as credit card fraudsters and risky accounts [4, 6, 8, 26, 27, 30, 36, 45, 48].”
BackgroundFew-shot Network Anomaly Detection via Cross-network Meta-learning
Ding, K.-Z., Zhou, Q., Tong, H.-H., & Liu, H. (2021) · The Web Conference · doi:10.1145/3442381.3449922 · Cited by 172
“Semi-GNN [38] is a semisupervised graph neural model which adopts hierarchical attention to model the multi-view graph for fraud detection.”
BackgroundMethodInvestigating and Mitigating Degree-Related Biases in Graph Convoltuional Networks
Tang, X., Yao, H., Sun, Y., Wang, Y., Tang, J., Aggarwal, C. C., Mitra, P., & Wang, S. (2020) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3340531.3411872 · Cited by 127
“Over last few years, Graph Convolutional Networks (GCNs) have benefited many real world applications across different domains, such as molecule design [37], financial fraud detection [29], traffic prediction [30, 38], and user behavior analysis [11, 18, 27].”
BackgroundCondensing Graphs via One-Step Gradient Matching
Jin, W., Tang, X.-F., Jiang, H., Li, Z., Zhang, D., Tang, J.-L., & Yin, B. (2022) · Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3534678.3539429 · Cited by 166
“For example, by exploiting graph structural information, we can predict the chemical property of a given molecular graph [46], detect fraud activities in a nancial transaction graph [35], or recommend new friends to users in a social network [8].”
BackgroundDecoupling Representation Learning and Classification for GNN-based Anomaly Detection
Wang, Y., Zhang, J., Guo, S., Yin, H., Li, C., & Chen, H. (2021) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/3404835.3462944 · Cited by 131
“Other GNN-based anomaly detection models such as GraphConsis [29] and Semi-GNN [47] have been shown to be less useful than CARE-GNN, thus they are ignored in the experiments.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSemi-supervised Credit Card Fraud Detection via Attribute-Driven Graph Representation
Xiang, S., Zhu, M., Cheng, D., Li, E.-X., Zhao, R., Ouyang, Y., Chen, L., & Zheng, Y. (2023) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v37i12.26702 · Cited by 161
“Graph attentive network model and random walks (Wang et al. 2019a) were deployed on social graphs to link the unlabeled and labeled data and pass messages among them.”
InfluentialGAD-NR: Graph Anomaly Detection via Neighborhood Reconstruction
Roy, A., Shu, J., Li, J., Yang, C., Elshocht, O., Smeets, J., & Li, P. (2023) · Web Search and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3616855.3635767 · Cited by 161
“Anomaly Detection aims to identify entities that deviate significantly from the norm, which has been used for a variety of applications, such as revealing fraudulent or spam activity in social networks [26, 63, 72, 76, 84, 85] and financial transactions networks [10, 18, 19, 55, 67, 69, 74].”
BackgroundOne-class graph neural networks for anomaly detection in attributed networks
Wang, X.-H., Jin, B., Du, Y., Cui, P., Tan, Y.-S., & Yang, Y.-P. (2020) · Neural computing & applications (Print) · doi:10.1007/s00521-021-05924-9 · Cited by 161
“Even though GNNs have demonstrated outstanding performance in many graph mining tasks [19,35,30], it remains unclear how to exploit their potentiality for GAD problem.”
BackgroundSelf-citationReinforced Neighborhood Selection Guided Multi-Relational Graph Neural Networks
Peng, H. M., Zhang, R., Dou, Y., Yang, R., Zhang, J., & Yu, P. S. (2021) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3490181 · Cited by 163
“However, from the results of some of the baselines in the table, although GCN, GAT, GraphSAGE, and GeniePath models run on a single relation graph, they are better than RGCN, Player2Vec, and SemiGNN in terms of accuracy of the Yelp dataset, which are run on the multi-relational graphs.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialShift-Robust GNNs: Overcoming the Limitations of Localized Graph Training dataPreprint
Zhu, Q., Ponomareva, N., Han, J., & Perozzi, B. (2021) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.01099 · Cited by 155
Towards Robust Graph Neural Networks for Noisy Graphs with Sparse Labels
Dai, E.-Y., Jin, W.-D., Liu, H., & Wang, S. (2022) · Web Search and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3488560.3498408 · Cited by 153
“Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) [15, 22] have made remarkable achievements in modeling graphs from various domains such as social networks [15], financial system [35], and recommendation”
BackgroundIndividual Fairness for Graph Neural Networks
Dong, Y., Kang, J. L., Tong, H., & Li, J. (2021) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3447548.3467266 · Cited by 96
“To assess the performance of our proposed framework REDRESS, we choose thewidely adopted semi-supervised node classification task [19, 36, 39] and link prediction task [20, 26] as the downstream learning tasks.”
BackgroundMethodZhong, Q., Liu, Y., Ao, X., Hu, B.-B., Feng, J.-H., Tang, J.-Y., & He, Q. (2020) · The Web Conference · doi:10.1145/3366423.3380159 · Cited by 140
“A few of recent works start to utilize the graph-based methods to model complex interactive patterns of users [13, 18, 19, 32].”
BackgroundCan Abnormality be Detected by Graph Neural Networks?
Chai, Z., You, S.-Q., Yang, Y., Pu, S.-L., Xu, J.-R., Cai, H., & Jiang, W.-H. (2022) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2022/270 · Cited by 138
GADBench: Revisiting and Benchmarking Supervised Graph Anomaly Detection
Tang, J.-H., Hua, F., Gao, Z.-C., Zhao, P.-L., & Li, J. (2023) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.12251 · Cited by 137
“To tackle the unique challenges of graph anomalies, such as imbalance, heterophily, and camouflage, several adaptations of standard GNNs have been proposed [20, 96, 24, 53, 52, 21, 79, 54, 90].”
BackgroundDeep Graph Anomaly Detection: A Survey and New Perspectives
Qiao, H., Tong, H., An, B., King, I., Aggarwal, C. C., & Pang, G. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2025.3581578 · Cited by 149
AUC-oriented Graph Neural Network for Fraud Detection
Huang, M., Liu, Y., Ao, X., Li, K., Chi, J.-F., Feng, J.-H., Yang, H., & He, Q. (2022) · The Web Conference · doi:10.1145/3485447.3512178 · Cited by 135
“Based on classic GNN architectures, various models are invented by reconstructing graph for fraud detection tasks, such as Fdgars [39], GraphConsis [22] and SemiGNN [38].”
MethodTowards Self-Explainable Graph Neural Network
Dai, E., & Wang, S. (2021) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3459637.3482306 · Cited by 88
“Graph neural networks (GNNs) [3, 12, 18] have made remarkable achievements in modeling graph structured data from various domains such as social networks [8, 12], financial system [41], and recommendation system [42].”
BackgroundAlleviating Structural Distribution Shift in Graph Anomaly Detection
Gao, Y., Wang, X., He, X., Liu, Z., Feng, H., & Zhang, Y. (2023) · ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM) · doi:10.1145/3539597.3570377 · Cited by 76
“Recent methods realize the importance of incorporating multiple relationships into graph learning [12, 24–26, 42, 44].”
MethodInternet Financial Fraud Detection Based on Graph Learning
Li, R., Liu, Z., Ma, Y., Yang, D., & Sun, S. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2022.3189368 · Cited by 106
“SemiGNN [40], a semisupervised attention GNN, is proposed to address the lack of labeled data in the network and uses a hierarchical attention mechanism to perform fraudulent user detection by embedding learning from multiple views.”
MethodXu, B.-B., Shen, H.-W., Sun, B.-J., An, R., Cao, Q., & Cheng, X.-Q. (2021) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i5.16582 · Cited by 106
“SemiGNN (Wang et al. 2019) proposes to expand the labeled data through their social relations to get the unlabeled data, utilizing the multi-view labeled and unlabeled data for fraud detection.”
BackgroundUnnoticeable Backdoor Attacks on Graph Neural Networks
Dai, E., Lin, M., Zhang, X. D., & Wang, S. (2023) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3543507.3583392 · Cited by 87
“Graph-structured data are very pervasive in the real-world such as social networks [14], fnance system [29], and molecular graphs [17].”
BackgroundArtificial Intelligence and Fraud Detection
Bao, Y., Hilary, G., & Ke, B. (2020) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3738618 · Cited by 99
Accelerating large scale real-time GNN inference using channel pruning
Zhou, H., Srivastava, A., Zeng, H., Kannan, R., & Prasanna, V. K. (2021) · Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment · doi:10.14778/3461535.3461547 · Cited by 84
Reconstruction Enhanced Multi-View Contrastive Learning for Anomaly Detection on Attributed Networks
Zhang, J., Wang, S., & Chen, S. (2022) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2022/330 · Cited by 93
Anti-Money Laundering by Group-Aware Deep Graph Learning
Cheng, D., Ye, Y., Xiang, S., Ma, Z., Zhang, Y., & Jiang, C. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2023.3272396 · Cited by 88
Robust Training of Graph Neural Networks via Noise Governance
Qian, S., Ying, H., Hu, R., Zhou, J., Chen, J., Chen, D. Z., & Wu, J. (2023) · ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM) · doi:10.1145/3539597.3570369 · Cited by 48
Self-citationAntiBenford Subgraphs: Unsupervised Anomaly Detection in Financial Networks
Chen, T., & Tsourakakis, C. E. (2022) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3534678.3539100 · Cited by 77
“Graph neural networks are used on financial networks, typically in a semi-supervised setting [77, 79, 80].”
Towards Graph Contrastive Learning: A Survey and BeyondPreprint
Ju, W., Wang, Y., Qin, Y., Mao, Z., Xiao, Z., Luo, J., Yang, J., Gu, Y., Wang, D., Long, Q., et al. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.11868 · Cited by 107
“By delving deeper into the robustness of GCL, GCL techniques can be better applied to risk-sensitive critical scenarios like financial fraud detection [157].”
MethodSelf-citationUnderstanding Structural Vulnerability in Graph Convolutional Networks
Chen, L., Li, J., Peng, Q., Liu, Y., Zheng, Z.-B., & Yang, C. (2021) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2021/310 · Cited by 79
Partitioning Message Passing for Graph Fraud Detection
Zhuo, W., Liu, Z., Hooi, B., He, B.-S., Tan, G., Fathony, R., & Chen, J. (2024) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.00020 · Cited by 76
“…aforementioned problems, many existing GNN-based fraud detection models adopt strategies such as re-weighting neighbors from different classes using predefined indicators (Liu et al., 2021c) or learnable attention values (Wang et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2021a; Shi et al., 2022; Cui et al., 2020).”
SAD: Semi-Supervised Anomaly Detection on Dynamic Graphs
Tian, S., Dong, J., Li, J., Zhao, W., Xu, X., Wang, B.-K., Song, B., Meng, C., Zhang, T., & Chen, L. (2023) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.13573 · Cited by 76
Learning Strong Graph Neural Networks with Weak Information
Liu, Y., Ding, K.-Z., Wang, J., Lee, V., Liu, H., & Pan, S. (2023) · Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3580305.3599410 · Cited by 75
“GNNs have shown remarkable success across diverse knowledge discovery and data mining scenarios, including drug discovery [17], fraud detection [29, 47], and knowledge reasoning [34].”
BackgroundFederated Graph Learning -- A Position PaperPreprint
Zhang, H., Shen, T., Wu, F. Q., Yin, M., Yang, H., & Wu, C. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2105.11099 · Cited by 71
Scenario-Based Requirements Elicitation for User-Centric Explainable AI - A Case in Fraud Detection
Cirqueira, D., Nedbal, D., Helfert, M., & Bezbradica, M. (2020) · International Cross-Domain Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-57321-8_18 · Cited by 74
“[22,36,43,44,55,68,71, 72,80,88,89,92,93, 95,96,97,98, 101,102,103,104,105, 106,107] 24 Yes Analyze Relationships Between Subjects This task is associated with the analysis of a transaction destination.”
MethodLGM-GNN: A Local and Global Aware Memory-Based Graph Neural Network for Fraud Detection
Li, P., Yu, H., Luo, X., & Wu, J. X. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Big Data · doi:10.1109/tbdata.2023.3234529 · Cited by 80
“For example, Semi-GNN [39] decomposes heterogeneous graphs into multi-views and then then fuses features from different perspectives through an attentionbased hierarchical fusion method.”
MethodDGA-GNN: Dynamic Grouping Aggregation GNN for Fraud Detection
Duan, M., Zheng, T., Gao, Y., Wang, G., Feng, Z., & Wang, X. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i10.29067 · Cited by 60
“Ding et al. (2019) generates anomaly scores of nodes in an AutoEncoder paradigm based on GNNs; Li et al. (2019) and Wang et al. (2019a) introduce the advanced GNNs techniques for spam detection and fraud detection, respectively; Liu et al. (2019) designs a specific multi-hop aggregation mechanism…”
BackgroundMethod2019 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM)
Imani, S. (2019) · doi:10.1109/icdm47104.2019 · Cited by 68
GCCAD: Graph Contrastive Coding for Anomaly Detection
Chen, B., Zhang, J., Zhang, X.-K., Dong, Y.-X., Song, J., Zhang, P., Xu, K., Kharlamov, E., & Tang, J. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2022.3200459 · Cited by 67
Enhancing Credit Card Fraud Detection A Neural Network and SMOTE Integrated Approach
Zhu, M., Zhang, Y., Gong, Y., Xu, C., & Xiang, Y. (2024) · Journal of Theory and Practice of Engineering Science · doi:10.53469/jtpes.2024.04(02).04 · Cited by 65
“Zhou et al. [17] examined the application of graph-based methods in fraud detection, introducing a novel perspective that considers transaction relationships for improved accuracy.”
BackgroundDAGAD: Data Augmentation for Graph Anomaly Detection
Liu, F., Ma, X., Wu, J. X., Yang, J. Y., Xue, S., Beheshti, A., Zhou, C. D., Peng, H., Sheng, Q. Z., & Aggarwal, C. C. (2022) · Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icdm54844.2022.00036 · Cited by 63
“Even though there are a few works under semi-supervised learning settings [14], [15], it is difficult for them to effectively confront the challenges of the scarcity of labeled anomalies and class imbalance associated with anomaly detection.”
BackgroundTian, Y., Liu, G., Wang, J., & Zhou, M. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2023.3335485 · Cited by 85
“These methods fail to automatically detect fraud patterns and express important behavior information [6] since there are many interactions of transactions [7] and the transaction behaviors of users are dynamic [8].”
BackgroundCost-Sensitive GNN-Based Imbalanced Learning for Mobile Social Network Fraud Detection
Hu, X., Chen, H.-T., Chen, H.-C., Liu, S.-X., Li, X., Zhang, S.-B., Wang, Y.-H., & Xue, X.-Y. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2023.3302651 · Cited by 63
“1) Neighbor Information Aggregation: Previous works tend to use attention mechanisms [39], [40] or design weighting parameters [41] for message aggregation.”
BackgroundFraud detection in healthcare claims using machine learning: A systematic review
du Preez, A., Bhattacharya, S., Beling, P. A., & Bowen, E. (2024) · Artif. Intell. Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2024.103061 · Cited by 61
Heterogeneous graph neural networks for fraud detection and explanation in supply chain finance
Wu, B., Chao, K.-M., & Li, Y. (2024) · Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.is.2023.102335 · Cited by 60
SplitGNN: Spectral Graph Neural Network for Fraud Detection against Heterophily
Wu, B., Yao, X.-Y., Zhang, B., Chao, K.-M., & Li, Y. (2023) · International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management · doi:10.1145/3583780.3615067 · Cited by 59
An intelligent sequential fraud detection model based on deep learning
Zioviris, G., Kolomvatsos, K., & Stamoulis, G. I. (2024) · The Journal of Supercomputing · doi:10.1007/s11227-024-06030-y · Cited by 63
“The authors in [27] expand the labeled data through their social relations to get the unlabeled data and propose a semisupervised attentive Graph Neural Network, named SemiGNN, to utilize the multiview labeled and unlabeled data for fraud detection.”
Graph Condensation for Inductive Node Representation Learning
Gao, X., Chen, T., Zang, Y., Zhang, W., Nguyen, Q. H., Zheng, K., & Yin, H. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/icde60146.2024.00237 · Cited by 58
Karthika, J., & Senthilselvi, A. (2023) · Multimedia tools and applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-023-15730-1 · Cited by 57
Barely Supervised Learning for Graph-Based Fraud Detection
Yu, H., Liu, Z.-Y., & Luo, X.-F. (2024) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i15.29593 · Cited by 55
“Our method is implemented in PyTorch 1.13.1 (Paszke et al. 2019) and PyG (Fey and Lenssen 2019) with Python 3.9, and DGL (Wang et al. 2019c) is used for preprocessing the data.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialCounterfactual Graph Learning for Anomaly Detection on Attributed Networks
Xiao, C.-J., Xu, X., Lei, Y., Zhang, K., Liu, S., & Zhou, F. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2023.3250523 · Cited by 53
“The performance improvements of DeepSAD and SemiGNN are steadily increased with more labeled data.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBTG: A Bridge to Graph machine learning in telecommunications fraud detection
Hu, X., Chen, H., Liu, S., Jiang, H., Chu, G., & Li, R. (2022) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2022.07.020 · Cited by 62
Temporal Heterogeneous Graph Contrastive Learning for Fraud Detection in Credit Card Transactions
Wang, J., Liu, J., Zheng, W., & Ge, Y. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3599787 · Cited by 32
“Recent advances in graph neural networks (GNNs) have demonstrated remarkable potential in fraud detection by naturally modeling the relational structure inherent in financial networks [9], [10].”
InfluentialWeakly Supervised Anomaly Detection: A Survey
Jiang, M., Hou, C., Zheng, A., Hu, X.-Y., Han, S.-Q., Huang, H., He, X.-N., Yu, P. S., & Zhao, Y. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.04549 · Cited by 51
Graph Learning for Anomaly Analytics: Algorithms, Applications, and Challenges
Ren, J., Xia, F., Lee, I., Hoshyar, A. N., & Aggarwal, C. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3570906 · Cited by 50
“[95] designed a hierarchical attention structure in graph neural network from node-level attention to view-level attention when generating graph embeddings.”
BackgroundInfluentialLoan Default Analysis with Multiplex Graph Learning
Hu, B.-B., Zhang, Z.-Q., Zhou, J., Fang, J.-L., Jia, Q., Fang, Y.-M., Yu, Q., & Qi, Y. (2020) · International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management · doi:10.1145/3340531.3412724 · Cited by 50
“Compared to previous work [2, 8, 9, 17, 22, 23], our defined AMG is a more general framework to model real-world unstructured network data, which consists of hundreds of millions of nodes and edges of multiple types, and each node and edge is associated with plentiful attributes.”
BackgroundSelf-citationBA-GNN: On Learning Bias-Aware Graph Neural Network
Chen, Z., Xiao, T., & Kuang, K. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/icde53745.2022.00271 · Cited by 49
“Graph Convolutional Networks (GNNs) [1], [2], [7] have achieved great success in many real world applications across different domains, such as recommender system [11], molecule design [12], financial fraud detection [13], traffic prediction [14], and user behavior analysis [15].”
BackgroundImproving Fraud Detection via Hierarchical Attention-based Graph Neural Network
Liu, Y., Sun, Z., & Zhang, W. (2022) · Journal of Information Security and Applications · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2202.06096 · Cited by 48
“While other methods aggregate information intra-view and inter-∗ zhengya.sun@ia.ac.cn (Z. Sun) ORCID (s): view hierarchically, which convolute each node over its within-view neighborhood and then integrate information across views [22, 32, 46, 11].”
Enhancing Enterprise Financial Fraud Detection Using Machine Learning
Ismail, M., & Haq, M. A. (2024) · Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research · doi:10.48084/etasr.7437 · Cited by 47
“The continuation of Financial Statement Fraud (FSF) poses significant concerns to global capital market stability [12].”
BackgroundImproving Generalizability of Graph Anomaly Detection Models via Data Augmentation
Zhou, S., Huang, X. X., Liu, N., Zhou, H., Chung, F.-L., & Huang, L.-K. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2023.3271771 · Cited by 43
“In real-world networked systems, such as social networks [3] and payment transaction graphs [4], even a few anomalies, e.”
BackgroundEvasion Attack and Defense on Machine Learning Models in Cyber-Physical Systems: A Survey
Wang, S., Ko, R. K. L., Bai, G., Dong, N., Choi, T., & Zhang, Y. (2023) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2023.3344808 · Cited by 63
“…models in a variety of tasks, for example, intrusion detection [29], [30], [31], [32], load forecasting [33], [34], [35], [36], health monitoring [37], [38], [39], [40], privacy preserving [41], [42], [43], [44], traffic prediction [45], [46], [47], [48], and fraud detection [49], [50], [51], [52].”
BackgroundA Knowledge-Driven Anomaly Detection Framework for Social Production System
Li, Z., Xu, X., Hang, T., Xiang, H., Cui, Y., Qi, L., & Zhou, X. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2022.3217790 · Cited by 60
“It is essential for decision-makers to be aware of the abnormal patterns in data in the social system, such as financial fraud detection [2], spam detection [3], and network intrusion detection [4], [5].”
BackgroundLiang, T., Zeng, G., Zhong, Q., Chi, J.-F., Feng, J.-H., Ao, X., & Tang, J.-Y. (2021) · Web Search and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3437963.3441743 · Cited by 46
“com/stories/us machine learning based researches for CRF [14, 31, 35] in the AI research field, CLS has often been overlooked by the same research community.”
BackgroundCaT-GNN: Enhancing Credit Card Fraud Detection via Causal Temporal Graph Neural Networks
Duan, Y.-F., Zhang, G.-B., Wang, S., Peng, X., Wang, Z., Mao, J.-Y., Wu, H., Jiang, X., & Wang, K. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.14708 · Cited by 45
“…towards graph-based approaches as the use of graph convolutional networks on datasets with partial labels has been effective for predicting node attributes within citation networks so that many GNN-based fraud detectors have been proposed to detect fraud [ Wang et al. , 2019; Liu et al. , 2018 ] .”
Self-citationMore is Better (Mostly): On the Backdoor Attacks in Federated Graph Neural Networks
Xu, J., Wang, R., Koffas, S., Liang, K.-T., & Picek, S. (2022) · Asia-Pacific Computer Systems Architecture Conference · doi:10.1145/3564625.3567999 · Cited by 45
On Structural Explanation of Bias in Graph Neural Networks
Dong, Y.-S., Wang, S., Wang, Y., Derr, T., & Li, J.-D. (2022) · Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3534678.3539319 · Cited by 44
“With the increasing societal concerns on the fairness of GNNs [31], explorations have been made to alleviate the bias exhibited in GNNs.”
BackgroundHMSG: Heterogeneous Graph Neural Network based on Metapath Subgraph Learning
Guan, M.-Y., Cai, X., Shang, J., Hao, F., Liu, D., Jiao, X.-L., & Ni, W.-C. (2021) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2023.110930 · Cited by 44
Tur, A. O., Dall'Asen, N., Beyan, C., & Ricci, E. (2023) · International Conference on Image Analysis and Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2307.01533 · Cited by 42
“, medical diagnosis, defect detection, animal behavior understanding, and fraud detection [31,2,29].”
BackgroundGraph Mining for Cybersecurity: A Survey
Yan, B., Yang, C., Shi, C., Fang, Y., Li, Q., Ye, Y.-F., & Du, J.-P. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data · doi:10.1145/3610228 · Cited by 42
“For example, it was designed based on the attention mechanism in Heterogeneous Graph Attention Network (HAN) [193], which is also a prevalent choice in many cybersecurity solutions [69, 181, 235].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationCredit card fraud detection using a deep learning multistage model
Zioviris, G., Kolomvatsos, K., & Stamoulis, G. (2022) · Journal of Supercomputing · doi:10.1007/s11227-022-04465-9 · Cited by 42
“The authors in [20], expand the labelled data through their social relations to get the unlabelled data and propose a semi‐supervised attentive graph neural network, named SemiGNN to utilize the multi‐view labelled and unlabelled data for fraud detection.”
BackgroundWei, S., Lv, J., Guo, Y. F., Yang, Q. K., Chen, X., Zhao, Y., Li, Q., Zhuang, F., & Kou, G. (2024) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2023.120081 · Cited by 52
“Examples include SemiGNN [11] at ICDM 2019; HACUD [12] at AAAI 2019; ST-GNN [13] at IJCAI 2020; AMG-DP [14] at CIKM 2020; TemGNN [15] at SDM 2021; PC-GNN [16] at WWW 2021. bankruptcy prediction, and boost the development of financial risk research, especially SMEs bankruptcy research.”
BackgroundMethodGraph Sanitation with Application to Node Classification
Xu, Z., Du, B., & Tong, H. (2022) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3485447.3512180 · Cited by 25
“Graph mining has become the cornerstone in a wealth of real-world applications, such as social media mining [44], brain connectivity analysis [1], computational epidemiology [19] and financial fraud detection [37].”
BackgroundFinancial Risk Analysis for SMEs with Graph-based Supply Chain Mining
Yang, S., Zhang, Z.-Q., Zhou, J., Wang, Y., Sun, W., Zhong, X.-Y., Fang, Y.-M., Yu, Q., & Qi, Y. (2020) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2020/643 · Cited by 42
“As a result, spatial-based GNN was gradually proposed in [Niepert et al. , 2016; Hamilton et al. , 2017; Hu et al. , 2019; Wang et al. , 2019].”
Self-citationGAT-COBO: Cost-Sensitive Graph Neural Network for Telecom Fraud Detection
Hu, X., Chen, H.-T., Zhang, J., Chen, H.-C., Liu, S.-X., Li, X., Wang, Y.-H., & Xue, X.-Y. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Big Data · doi:10.1109/tbdata.2024.3352978 · Cited by 41
“…divided into three main categories, namely, GNN-based telecom fraud detection [4], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], GNN-based social network fraud detection [5], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], and GNN-based financial fraud detection [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45], [46].”
Dual-Augment Graph Neural Network for Fraud Detection
Li, Q., He, Y., Xu, C., Wu, F., Gao, J.-L., & Li, Z. (2022) · International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management · doi:10.1145/3511808.3557586 · Cited by 41
“Conventional graph-based detectors [14, 15] reveal fraudsters by aggregating their neighbors’ features based on the assumption of homophily (i.”
BackgroundPoster: Clean-label Backdoor Attack on Graph Neural Networks
Xu, J., & Picek, S. (2022) · Conference on Computer and Communications Security · doi:10.1145/3548606.3563531 · Cited by 40
“, drug design [8], fake news detection in social media [15], recommendation system [9], and even financial sector [7].”
BackgroundGUIDE: Group Equality Informed Individual Fairness in Graph Neural Networks
Song, W.-H., Dong, Y.-S., Liu, N.-H., & Li, J.-D. (2022) · Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3534678.3539346 · Cited by 40
“They are increasingly adopted in various tasks such as anomaly detection [26], social network recommendation [28], and graph classification [27].”
Graph Neural Networks: a bibliometrics overviewPreprint
Keramatfar, A., Rafiee, M., & Amirkhani, H. (2022) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2201.01188 · Cited by 2
“In the last few years, GNNs have become a hot topic in machine learning and benefited many graph-related tasks [39, 40] and real world applications across a verity of areas, including molecule design [14], financial fraud detection [8], traffic prediction [8, 13], user behavior analysis [15, 41, 42], and recommender s…”
BackgroundExplainable Graph-based Fraud Detection via Neural Meta-graph Search
Qin, Z., Liu, Y., He, Q., & Ao, X. (2022) · International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management · doi:10.1145/3511808.3557598 · Cited by 38
“One perspective to obtain explanations for fraud detection is applying attention mechanisms that generate soft masks on the input graph [12, 29].”
BackgroundMethodIDEA: A Flexible Framework of Certified Unlearning for Graph Neural Networks
Dong, Y.-S., Zhang, B., Lei, Z.-Y., Zou, N., & Li, J.-D. (2024) · Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3637528.3671744 · Cited by 37
SEFraud: Graph-based Self-Explainable Fraud Detection via Interpretative Mask Learning
Li, K. C., Yang, T., Zhou, M., Meng, J., Wang, S., Wu, Y., Tan, B., Song, H., Pan, L., Yu, F., et al. (2024) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3637528.3671534 · Cited by 37
“Many previous works conduct semi-supervised node classification tasks on single-relation graphs [18] or define multi-relation graph [4, 17, 20, 32] to tackle fraud detection tasks.”
BackgroundMethodInterpreting Unfairness in Graph Neural Networks via Training Node Attribution
Dong, Y.-S., Wang, S., Ma, J., Liu, N.-H., & Li, J.-D. (2022) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2211.14383 · Cited by 36
“Graph data is pervasive among a plethora of realms, e.g., financial fraud detection (Wang et al. 2019; Pourhabibi et al. 2020; Cheng et al. 2020), social recommendation (Fan et al. 2019; Song et al. 2019; Guo and Wang 2020), and chemical reaction prediction (Do, Tran, and Venkatesh 2019; Shi et al.…”
Wang, L., Li, P., Xiong, K., Zhao, J.-S., & Lin, R. (2021) · International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management · doi:10.1145/3459637.3482277 · Cited by 36
“GEM[26], SemiGNN[41], ASA[44], Player2Vec[50], and CARE-GNN[6] all construct multiple homogeneous graphs based on node relations in corresponding datasets.”
BackgroundDifferentially Private Decoupled Graph Convolutions for Multigranular Topology Protection
Chien, E., Chen, W.-N., Pan, C., Li, P., Ozgur, A., & Milenkovic, O. (2023) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2307.06422 · Cited by 35
Gradient-less Federated Gradient Boosting Tree with Learnable Learning Rates
Ma, C., Qiu, X.-C., Beutel, D. J., & Lane, N. (2023) · EuroMLSys@EuroSys · doi:10.1145/3578356.3592579 · Cited by 35
“In the context of cross-silo FL, where the clients pool is typically made up from 2 to 100 [12] organizations, there is a growing need to deploy a federated XGBoost system on specific tasks such as survival analysis [1] and financial fraud detection [6, 28].”
BackgroundPairwise Alignment Improves Graph Domain Adaptation
Liu, S.-K., Zou, D.-Y., Zhao, H., & Li, P. (2024) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.01092 · Cited by 34
“For instance, in fraud detection within financial networks, label acquisition may be constrained to specific network regions due to varying international legal frameworks and diverse data collection periods (Wang et al., 2019; Dou et al., 2020).”
BackgroundOptimizing Two-Way Partial AUC With an End-to-End Framework
Yang, Z., Xu, Q., Bao, S., He, Y., Cao, X., & Huang, Q. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2022.3185311 · Cited by 25
“As a natural result, AUC is more appropriate than accuracy for long-tail classification problems such as disease prediction [24], [80] and rare event detection [37], [41], [69], [71], due to this appealing property [19], [22].”
BackgroundUniGAD: Unifying Multi-level Graph Anomaly Detection
Li, J., Lin, Y., Tang, J.-H., Yao, Y., Zhao, H., & Zi, C.-Y. (2024) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.06427 · Cited by 32
“To address the specific challenges of graph anomalies such as label imbalance [34, 31], relation camouflage [12, 38], and feature heterophily [50, 15], numerous adaptations of standard GNNs have been proposed [9, 67, 13, 40, 39, 10, 53, 41, 62].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, D., Lin, J., Cui, P., Jia, Q., Wang, Z., Fang, Y., Yu, Q., Zhou, J., Yang, S., & Qi, Y.
- Affiliations
- Ant Group (China) (CN)
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2020
- Pages
- 598-607
- ISSN
- 1550-4786 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2003.01171
- OpenAlex
- W3009901425
- Cited by
- 476
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 51 · 2025: 93 · 2024: 91 · 2023: 105 · 2022: 78 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 16
- FWCI
- 13.01
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Proceedings (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
- Keywords
- financial fraud detection, graph attention networks, semi-supervised learning, hierarchical attention, interpersonal relationships, user characteristics, interpretable prediction, Alipay
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review