The DOI matches its DataCite record; 28 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Semi-supervised Graph Attentive Network for Financial Fraud Detection
Open accessAbstract
With the rapid growth of financial services, fraud detection has been a very important problem to guarantee a healthy environment for both users and providers. Conventional solutions for fraud detection mainly use some rule-based methods or distract some features manually to perform prediction. However, in financial services, users have rich interactions and they themselves always show multifaceted information. These data form a large multiview network, which is not fully exploited by conventional methods. Additionally, among the network, only very few of the users are labelled, which also poses a great challenge for only utilizing labeled data to achieve a satisfied performance on fraud detection. To address the problem, we expand the labeled data through their social relations to get the unlabeled data and propose a semi-supervised attentive graph neural network, namedSemiGNN to utilize the multi-view labeled and unlabeled data for fraud detection. Moreover, we propose a hierarchical attention mechanism to better correlate different neighbors and different views. Simultaneously, the attention mechanism can make the model interpretable and tell what are the important factors for the fraud and why the users are predicted as fraud. Experimentally, we conduct the prediction task on the users of Alipay, one of the largest third-party online and offline cashless payment platform serving more than 4 hundreds of million users in China. By utilizing the social relations and the user attributes, our method can achieve a better accuracy compared with the state-of-the-art methods on two tasks. Moreover, the interpretable results also give interesting intuitions regarding the tasks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Semi-supervised approaches exploit partial labels but are constrained by the quality and distribution of labels.”
From A Survey of Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks for Cybersecurity Anomaly Detection (2025) · cites this paper as [68]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“SemiGNN [68] uses hierarchical attention over metapathdefined subgraphs for fraud detection”
From A Survey of Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks for Cybersecurity Anomaly Detection (2025) · cites this paper as [68]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“SemiGNN [68] introduces a semi-supervised graph attention network designed for fraud detection in financial systems. It leverages both labeled and unlabeled nodes and incorporates hierarchical attention over metapath-based subgraphs. This makes it well-suited for access fraud scenarios where only partial labels are available and fraud behaviors differ across user roles and access types.”
From A Survey of Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks for Cybersecurity Anomaly Detection (2025) · cites this paper as [68]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Operational environments further demand reliability, interpretability, and maintainability [68].”
From A Survey of Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks for Cybersecurity Anomaly Detection (2025) · cites this paper as [68]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946 · cited 1×
“In our model SemiGNN, we randomly initialize parameters and optimize the model with Adam [14].”
MethodXGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2939672.2939785 · Cited by 54,569 · cited 1×
“• Xgboost [28]: It is a tree-based model, which is very”
BackgroundSemi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks
Kipf, T. N., & Welling, M. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1609.02907 · Cited by 24,853 · cited 3×
“• GCN [24]: It is a deep graph neural network and each node’s embedding is ensembled by its own embedding”
BackgroundMethodVeličković, P., Cucurull, G., Casanova, A., Romero, A., Liò, P., & Bengio, Y. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1710.10903 · Cited by 12,107
node2vec: Scalable Feature Learning for Networks
Grover, A., & Leskovec, J. (2016) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2939672.2939754 · Cited by 10,926 · cited 1×
“DeepWalk [16] and Node2vec [17] propose to use the random walk and skip-gram to learn the node representations.”
MethodDeepWalk: online learning of social representations
Perozzi, B., Al-Rfou, R., & Skiena, S. (2014) · Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/2623330.2623732 · Cited by 10,123
LINE: Large-scale Information Network Embedding
Tang, J., Qu, M., Wang, M., Zhang, M., Yan, J., & Mei, Q. (2015) · Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/2736277.2741093 · Cited by 5,416 · cited 6×
“LINE [18] and SDNE [19] propose explicit objective functions for preserving first-and second-order proximity.”
MethodInfluentialMultimodal Deep LearningPreprint
Akkus, C., Chu, L.-Y., Djakovic, V., Jauch-Walser, S., Koch, P., Loss, G., Marquardt, C., Moldovan, M., Sauter, N., Schneider, M., et al. (2011) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2301.04856 · Cited by 3,745 · cited 2×
“Through several layers of non-linear functions to map the raw data into the high-level semantic space, it is easier to correlate multiview data [27].”
BackgroundStructural Deep Network Embedding
Wang, D., Cui, P., & Zhu, W. (2016) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2939672.2939753 · Cited by 2,845 · cited 1×
“LINE [18] and SDNE [19] propose explicit objective functions for preserving first-and second-order proximity.”
BackgroundSelf-citationLearning Convolutional Neural Networks for GraphsPreprint
Niepert, M., Ahmed, M., & Kutzkov, K. (2016) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1605.05273 · Cited by 2,315 · cited 1×
“Recently, graph convolution network based methods are very popular [24], [25].”
Method
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- [3][3] Quah, Jon TS, and M. Sriganesh. 'l 35.4 (2008): 1721-1732. -
- [7][7] Bose, I., and J. Wang. 'Data mining for detection of financial statement fraud in Chinese Companies.' International joint Conference on e-Commerce, e-Administration, e-Society, and e-Education. International Business Academics Consortium (IBAC) and Knowledge Association of Taiwan (KAT), 2007. -
- [21][21] Cao, Shaosheng, Wei Lu, and Qiongkai Xu. 'Grarep: Learning graph representations with global structural information.' Proceedings of the 24th ACM international on conference on information and knowledge management. ACM, 2015. -
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 477
Temporal Motifs for Financial Networks: A Study on Mercari, JPMC, and Venmo Platforms
Liu, P., Altun, B., Acharyya, R., Tillman, R., Kimura, S., Masuda, N., & Sarıyüce, A. E. (2023) · International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2301.07791 · Cited by 11
“Wang et al. (2019) proposed a semi-supervised attentive graph neural network to utilize the multi-view labeled and unlabeled data for fraud detection.”
FairMILE: Towards an Efficient Framework for Fair Graph Representation Learning
He, Y., Gurukar, S., & Parthasarathy, S. (2022) · Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization · doi:10.1145/3617694.3623231 · Cited by 11
“This demonstrates that existing fair representation learning works are inefficient and scalable embedding methods are unable to enforce fairness, which highlights our novelty and contributions.”
BackgroundMetapath and syntax-aware heterogeneous subgraph neural networks for spam review detection
Zhang, Z., Dong, Y., Wu, H., Song, H., Deng, S., & Chen, Y. (2022) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109438 · Cited by 13
Towards Fraud Detection via Fine-Grained Classification of User Behavior
Wang, X., Yu, H., Guo, J., Li, P., & Luo, X. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Big Data · doi:10.1109/tbdata.2024.3517313 · Cited by 11
“For example, SemiGNN [14] utilizes a GNN-based hierarchical attention mechanism to detect financial fraud in Alipay.”
S2FGL: Spatial Spectral Federated Graph Learning
Tan, Z., Huang, S., Wan, G.-C., Huang, W.-K., Li, H., & Ye, M. (2025) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.02409 · Cited by 10
“…efficacy in modeling graph-structured data (Wan et al., 2025a; Fang et al., 2025), thereby finding applications across various domains, such as social networks (Fan et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2022b), epidemiology (Liu et al., 2024), and fraud detection (Wang et al., 2019; Tang et al., 2022).”
Homophilic and Heterophilic-Aware Sparse Graph Transformer for Financial Fraud Detection
Wang, X., Luo, X.-F., Wang, X.-Z., & Yu, H. (2024) · IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Network · doi:10.1109/ijcnn60899.2024.10650212 · Cited by 10
“SemiGNN [25] constructs a multi-view graph and aggregates information from different views of the same node to represent nodes.”
BackgroundGuarding Graph Neural Networks for Unsupervised Graph Anomaly Detection
Bei, Y., Zhou, S., Shi, J., Ma, Y., Wang, H., & Bu, J. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2025.3569526 · Cited by 16
“It has attracted increasing attention from both academia and industry due to its practical applications, such as network intrusion detection [1], social spammer detection [4], and financial fraud detection [5].”
Towards Fair Graph Anomaly Detection: Problem, Benchmark Datasets, and Evaluation
Neo, N. K. N., Lee, Y.-C., Jin, Y., Kim, S.-W., & Kumar, S. (2024) · International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management · doi:10.1145/3627673.3679754 · Cited by 10
Improving fraud detection via imbalanced graph structure learning
Ren, L., Hu, R.-M., Liu, Y., Li, D., Wu, J., Zang, Y., & Hu, W.-Y. (2023) · Machine-mediated learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-023-06464-0 · Cited by 10
“With the booming of the Internet and telecommunication industries, various fraud activities have emerged in the fields of finance (Wang et al., 2019; Zhong et al., 2020), social security (Van Vlasselaer et al., 2017), and healthcare (Zhang et al., 2022), leading to user privacy breaches, personal…”
VertexSerum: Poisoning Graph Neural Networks for Link Inference
Ding, R., Duan, S., Xu, X., & Fei, Y. (2023) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv51070.2023.00418 · Cited by 8
“Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have been widely adopted in various domains, such as financial fraud detection [25], social network analysis [19], and heart-failure prediction [6], thanks to their capabilities to model highdimensional features and complex structural relationships between entities [30].”
BackgroundNatural and Artificial Dynamics in Graphs: Concept, Progress, and Future
Fu, D., & He, J. (2022) · Frontiers in Big Data · doi:10.3389/fdata.2022.1062637 · Cited by 4
“, 2019), fraud detection (Wang et al., 2019), and molecule design (Liu et al.”
BackgroundReal-Time Transaction Fraud Detection via Heterogeneous Temporal Graph Neural Network
Nguyen, H., & Le, H. B. (2025) · International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.5220/0013161300003890 · Cited by 10
“The novel work by (Wang et al., 2019) and (Liu et al., 2020) laid the foundation for using graph neural network (GNN) in fraud detection, particularly for datasets with partial labels.”
Robust memory-based graph neural networks for noisy and sparse graphs
Jiang, L., Zhang, W.-C., Wang, H., & Zhang, F. (2025) · Engineering applications of artificial intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2025.111874 · Cited by 9
Non-exchangeable Conformal Prediction for Temporal Graph Neural Networks
Wang, T., Kang, J., Yan, Y., Kulkarni, A., & Zhou, D. (2025) · Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3711896.3737064 · Cited by 9
“Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have become integral to a wide range of real-world applications, including financial fraud detection [33], traffic forecasting [11], and pharmaceutical discovery [30].”
TFD: Trust-Based Fraud Detection in SIoT With Graph Convolutional Networks
Jiang, N., Gu, W., Li, L., Zhou, F., Qiu, S., Zhou, T., & Chen, H. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics · doi:10.1109/tce.2024.3417471 · Cited by 7
“Leveraging the superior representational capabilities of graph structures, graph-based fraud detection has received substantial recognition in both academia and industrial communities [8], [12], [13], [14], [15].”
InfluentialFinancial Fraud Detection using Jump-Attentive Graph Neural Networks
Kadam, P. (2024) · International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications · doi:10.1109/icmla61862.2024.00091 · Cited by 9
“For state-of-the-art comparisons we use CareGNN [24], Semi-GNN [21], PC-GNN [23], and GTAN [34] since these are some of the best-performing methods on publicly available datasets like Yelp Fraud.”
Enhancing Financial Fraud Detection with Human-in-the-Loop Feedback and Feedback Propagation
Kadam, P. (2024) · International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications · doi:10.1109/icmla61862.2024.00185 · Cited by 9
“We also compared with state-of-the-art methods like CareGNN [35], Semi-GNN [32], and BOLT [48], ensuring a comprehensive evaluation across tabular and graph-based algorithms.”
Towards Cross-Domain Few-Shot Graph Anomaly Detection
Chen, J., Fu, S., Zhang, Z.-B., Ma, Z., Feng, M., Wirjanto, T. S., & Peng, Q. (2024) · Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icdm59182.2024.00012 · Cited by 8
“For instance, SemiGNN [14] trains a binary classifier on labeled samples and enhances the learning of normal representations through a hierarchical attention mechanism.”
Fusing LLMs and KGs for Formal Causal Reasoning behind Financial Risk Contagion
Yu, G., Wang, X., Li, Q., & Zhao, Y. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.17190 · Cited by 9
“However, the majority of existing studies concentrate on the development of risk recognition models based on machine learning [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10] and deep learning [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18].”
BackgroundWhen Heterophily Meets Heterogeneity: Challenges and a New Large-Scale Graph Benchmark
Lin, J.-H., Guo, X.-J., Zhang, S., Zhu, Y.-D., & Shun, J. (2024) · Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3711896.3737421 · Cited by 9
“Graphs are commonly used to model complex relationships across various domains, such as finance [50], social science [26, 48] and cybersecurity [16, 52].”
Self-citationAn unsupervised deep global–local views model for anomaly detection in attributed networks
Lei, T., Ou, M., Gong, C., Li, J., & Yang, K. (2024) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2024.112185 · Cited by 8
Ensemble of Graph Neural Networks for Enhanced Financial Fraud Detection
Hiremath, A., Arya, A., Sriranga, L., Reddy, K. C. S., & Nikhil, M. (2024) · 2024 IEEE 9th International Conference for Convergence in Technology (I2CT) · doi:10.1109/i2ct61223.2024.10543898 · Cited by 9
“In this paper, a novel and seamless approach is proposed that exploits the cumulative performance of four discrete Graph Neural Network architectures: Semi-GNN [9], Graph Embeddings for Malicious Accounts (GEM) [10], Graph-based Anti-Spam (GAS) [11], and FdGars [12].”
BackgroundDeceptive Fairness Attacks on Graphs via Meta Learning
Kang, J., Xia, Y.-L., Maciejewski, R., Luo, J., & Tong, H. (2023) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.15653 · Cited by 9
“For example, consider a financial fraud detection system which utilizes a transaction network to classify whether a bank account is fraudulent or not (Zhang et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2019).”
BackgroundVoucher Abuse Detection with Prompt-based Fine-tuning on Graph Neural Networks
Wen, Z., Fang, Y., Liu, Y., Guo, Y., & Hao, S. (2023) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3583780.3615505 · Cited by 8
“Motivated by their success, many GNN-based anomaly detection algorithms have emerged, including GAS [18], FdGars [40], GraphConsis [27] and CARE-GNN [10] for review fraud detection, GeniePath [25] and SemiGNN [39] for financial fraud detection, FANG [31] for fake news detection, ASA [42] for mobile fraud detection, an…”
MethodSelf-citationMS_HGNN: a hybrid online fraud detection model to alleviate graph-based data imbalance
Long, J., Fang, F., Luo, C., Wei, Y.-H., & Weng, T. (2023) · Connection science · doi:10.1080/09540091.2023.2191893 · Cited by 9
“The authors in Wang et al. (2020) proposed a GAT-based semi-supervised GNN, called SemiGNN.”
BackgroundLongArms: Fraud Prediction in Online Lending Services Using Sparse Knowledge Graph
Wang, C., Zhu, H., Hu, R., Li, R., & Jiang, C. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Big Data · doi:10.1109/tbdata.2022.3172060 · Cited by 13
“Usually, it can tolerate relatively high false positive rates [13].”
BackgroundWho are the evil backstage manipulators: Boosting graph attention networks against deep fraudsters
Hu, X., Chen, H.-C., Liu, S.-X., Jiang, H., Wang, K., & Wang, Y.-H. (2023) · Comput. Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2023.109698 · Cited by 9
Robust Graph Representation Learning via Predictive Coding
Byiringiro, B., Salvatori, T., & Lukasiewicz, T. (2022) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2212.04656 · Cited by 9
“…learning, providing interdisciplinary state-of-the-art performance in areas such as e-commerce and financial fraud detection [Zhang et al., 2022, Wang et al., 2019], drug and advanced material discovery [Bongini et al., 2021, Zhao et al., 2021, Xiong et al., 2019], recommender systems [Wu et…”
BackgroundDual-MGAN: An Efficient Approach for Semi-supervised Outlier Detection with Few Identified Anomalies
Li, Z., Sun, C.-H., Liu, C.-L., Chen, X.-Y., Wang, M., & Liu, Y.-Z. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data · doi:10.1145/3522690 · Cited by 9
“As for semi-supervised outlier detection with a small amount of labeled data [16, 50, 52] or few identified anomalies [17, 41, 57], the conditions for the latter are easier to meet and more common than those for the former, and few identified anomalies have been able to yield valuable information for training the dete…”
BackgroundEnhance Information Propagation for Graph Neural Network by Heterogeneous AggregationsPreprint
Leng, D.-W., Guo, J., Pan, L.-R., Li, J., & Wang, X. (2021) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2102.04064 · Cited by 9
“…are better described as graph and thus processed by graph neural networks, such as social networks (Fan et al., 2019), financial fraud detection (Wang et al., 2020), knowledge graph (Zhang et al., 2020), biology interaction network (Higham et al., 2008), small molecule in drug discovery (Hu et…”
Long-term evolutionary patterns matter: Self-supervised anomaly detection on dynamic graphs
Fu, Y.-L., Zhou, C., Li, J., & Chen, L. (2025) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2025.113049 · Cited by 8
Yang, J., Peng, J.-K., Zhang, Q.-W., Chen, W., & Ma, C.-Y. (2024) · Expert systems with applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125999 · Cited by 8
Global confidence degree based graph neural network for financial fraud detection
Liu, J., Tian, Y., & Liu, G.-J. (2024) · Artificial Intelligence and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.55092/aias20250004 · Cited by 8
“To address these challenges, some advanced GNN models employ attention mechanisms to assess the significance of edges during the message-passing process (Wang et al. 2019; Liu et al. 2021a).”
MethodGraph Anomaly Detection with Domain-Agnostic Pre-Training and Few-Shot Adaptation
Li, X., & Chen, L. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE) · doi:10.1109/icde60146.2024.00209 · Cited by 6
“S EMI GNN [11] is the semi-supervised baseline by concurrently computing the cross-entropy loss of predicted labels and the unsupervised loss measured with the node similarity to neighbors in the unified objective function.”
MethodXu, J., Koffas, S., & Picek, S. (2023) · DTRAP · doi:10.1145/3633206 · Cited by 8
“Due to their strong representation learning capability, GNNs have demonstrated remarkable performance in various domains, such as drug discovery [27, 49], finance [8, 42], social networks [11, 16], and recommendation systems [10, 55].”
BackgroundOnline Corrupted User Detection and Regret Minimization
Wang, Z., Xie, J., Yu, T., Li, S., & Lui, J. C. S. (2023) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.04768 · Cited by 8
“[34] Daixin Wang, Jianbin Lin, Peng Cui, Quanhui Jia, Zhen Wang, Yanming Fang, Quan Yu, Jun Zhou, Shuang Yang, and Yuan Qi.”
BackgroundSelf-citationLi, L., & Xu, J. (2023) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2023.111005 · Cited by 7
Yadav, A. K. S., & Sora, M. (2022) · Concurrency and Computation · doi:10.1002/cpe.7340 · Cited by 8
“Wang et al. 18 developed a graph attentive semi-supervised (SemiGNN) network for detecting financial frauds.”
BackgroundDeep Learning and its Applications: A Real-World Perspective
Medida, L. H., & Ramani, K. (2021) · Deep Learning and Edge Computing Solutions for High Performance Computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-60265-9_10 · Cited by 8
On the Use of a Sequential Deep Learning Scheme for Financial Fraud Detection
Zioviris, G., Kolomvatsos, K., & Stamoulis, G. (2021) · Sai · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-80126-7_37 · Cited by 8
A Fair Evaluation of Graph Foundation Models for Node Property Prediction
Platonov, O., Bazhenov, G., Eremeev, D., & Prokhorenkova, L. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.24509 · Cited by 7
“This is due to graph message passing in GNNs from Platonov et al. (2023b) being implemented using DGL (Wang et al., 2019b), while graph message passing in GNNs from Luo et al. (2024) is implemented using PyTorch Geometric (Fey & Lenssen, 2019): we find that DGL typically allows more efficient implementation of graph m…”
InfluentialParallel Graph Learning With Temporal Stamp Encoding for Fraudulent Transactions Detections
Ma, J., Xiang, S., Li, Q., Liu, Y., Cheng, D.-W., & Jiang, C. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Big Data · doi:10.1109/tbdata.2024.3499338 · Cited by 7
NeutronTask: Scalable and Efficient Multi-GPU GNN Training with Task Parallelism
Fu, Z., Ai, X., Wang, Q.-G., Zhang, Y.-F., Lu, S., Chen, C., Cao, C., Yuan, H., Wei, Z., Gu, Y., et al. (2025) · Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment · doi:10.14778/3725688.3725700 · Cited by 7
“…superior performance across various practical applications such as social networks [29, 68, 75], recommendation systems [15, 67, 74], financial fraud detection [61], protein structure analysis [18], drug prediction [37, 49], traffic forecasting [6, 28], and natural language processing [42, 73].”
Stealing Training Graphs from Graph Neural Networks
Lin, M., Dai, E., Xu, J., Jia, J., Zhang, X. D., & Wang, S. (2025) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3690624.3709289 · Cited by 8
“Graph-structured data pervade numerous real-world applications such as social networks [22], finance systems [54], and molecular graphs [55].”
Training-free Graph Neural Networks and the Power of Labels as Features
Sato, R. (2024) · Trans. Mach. Learn. Res. · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.19288 · Cited by 7
“There are also many practical applications of transductive node classification, such as document classification [17, 48] and fraud detection[20, 21, 42] and advertisement targeting.”
BackgroundTelecom Fraud Detection Based on Feature Binning and Autoencoder
Liang, F.-Y., Li, F., Xu, R., Cheng, W., Deng, S.-X., Yang, Z.-R., & Wang, C.-D. (2023) · Industrial Conference on Data Mining · doi:10.1109/icdm58522.2023.00046 · Cited by 7
“[9] introduce a semi-supervised GNN for fraud detection problems, which utilizes both labeled and unlabeled data to extract discriminative and structural information to get a more accurate classification result.”
MethodJiang, S., Uddin, A., Wei, Z., & Yu, D.-T. (2023) · International Conference on AI in Finance · doi:10.1145/3604237.3626910 · Cited by 7
“Furthermore, the literature indicates that graph frameworks facilitate improved information extraction from financial networks, thus improving the predictability of stock returns[18, 22, 38], credit risk[20, 33], and fraud detection[32].”
BackgroundSomkunwar, R. K., Pimpalkar, M. P., Katakdound, K. M., Bhide, A. S., Chinchalkar, S. P., & Patil, Y. M. (2023) · 2023 International Conference on Ambient Intelligence, Knowledge Informatics and Industrial Electronics (AIKIIE) · doi:10.1109/aikiie60097.2023.10390325 · Cited by 7
“In the paper [18], the authors previously explained a solution for detecting election fraud using Benford's Law.”
MethodFinancial Fraud: Identifying Corporate Tax Report Fraud Under the Xgboost Algorithm
Li, X.-J. (2023) · ICST Transactions on Scalable Information Systems · doi:10.4108/eetsis.v10i3.3033 · Cited by 7
“With the continuous development of the capital market [1], the development of enterprises has also been subject to great challenges.”
Background2SFGL: A Simple And Robust Protocol For Graph-Based Fraud Detection
Pan, Z., Wang, G., Li, Z., Chen, L., Bian, Y., & Lai, Z. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science · doi:10.1109/cloudcom55334.2022.00036 · Cited by 7
“SemiGNN [33] is a semi-supervised GNN model with a hierarchical attention mechanism for explainable fraud prediction.”
MethodFACS-GCN: Fairness-Aware Cost-Sensitive Boosting of Graph Convolutional Networks
Santos, F., Ye, J., Masrour, F., Tan, P., & Esfahanian, A. (2022) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn55064.2022.9892919 · Cited by 4
“It can be applied to many applications, from spam [1] and financial fraud [2] detection to customer churn [3] and recidivism [4] prediction.”
BackgroundDetecting Anomalies in FinTech: A Graph Neural Network and Feature Selection Perspective
Hoang, V., Dinh, N., Le, V.-T., Tran-Trung, K., Van, B. N., & Meethongjan, K. (2026) · Comput. Mater. Continua · doi:10.32604/cmc.2025.068733 · Cited by 7
“Emerging research on agentic AI [95–97], autonomous AI systems with persistent goals, adaptive capabilities, and self-directed optimization, could further strengthen FinTech anomaly detection pipelines by enabling systems not only to respond to fraud, but also to anticipate and proactively adapt to…”
Reinforced Cost-Sensitive Graph Network for Detecting Fraud Leaders in Telecom Fraud
Gao, P., Li, Z., Zhou, D.-B., & Zhang, L. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3448260 · Cited by 7
“SemiGNN [16] adopts a semi-supervised approach, using a hierarchical attention mechanism to aggregate intra-and inter-view features for detecting fraudulent users.”
Decoupling Graph Neural Network with Contrastive Learning for Fraud Detection
Meng, L., Ren, Y., & Zhang, J. (2023) · International Conference on Database Systems for Advanced Applications · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-30678-5_30 · Cited by 7
“Since only a very small portion of data has labels in fraud detection, SemiGNN [23] utilizes both labeled and unlabeled data in the loss function, while Player2Vec [32] construct multi-view networks from abundant information in the heterogeneous graph to enrich information.”
Label-Wise Message Passing Graph Neural Network on Heterophilic Graphs
Dai, E.-Y., Guo, Z., & Wang, S. (2021) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.08128 · Cited by 6
“2 Related Work Graph neural networks (GNNs) have shown great success for various applications such as social networks [19, 12, 47], financial transaction networks [39, 17] and traffic networks [45, 46].”
BackgroundDenoising Structure against Adversarial Attacks on Graph Representation Learning
Chen, N., Li, P., Huang, J., & Zhang, K. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3714428 · Cited by 6
“Examples range from social networks [9], e-commerce network [8], citation networks [6], to biological networks [39], to financial networks [35].”
Semi-supervised Anomaly Detection with Extremely Limited Labels in Dynamic Graphs
Chen, J.-Z., Fu, S.-C., Ma, Z., Feng, M., Wirjanto, T., & Peng, Q.-M. (2025) · International Conference on Database Systems for Advanced Applications · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.15035 · Cited by 6
“This has spurred increased attention towards semi-supervised GAD, which combines labeled data with unlabeled data to improve detection performance [9, 12,18,23,25].”
Are You Using Reliable Graph Prompts? Trojan Prompt Attacks on Graph Neural Networks
Lin, M.-H., Zhang, Z.-W., Dai, E.-Y., Wu, Z., Wang, Y.-L., Zhang, X., & Wang, S.-H. (2024) · Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3711896.3736845 · Cited by 6
“Graph-structured data are prevalent in numerous real-world applications, such as social networks [22], financial systems [52], and molecular graphs [53].”
Chen, C., Zheng, F., Cui, J., Cao, Y., Liu, G., Wu, J. X., & Zhou, J. (2024) · International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/s13042-024-02106-6 · Cited by 34
“KGs have been applied to various tasks, including question answering [82, 190], recommender system [24, 170], risk assessment [40], fraud detection [105, 137, 168], and information extraction [80, 94].”
Self-citationBL-GAN: Semi-Supervised Bug Localization via Generative Adversarial Network
Zhu, Z., Tong, H., Wang, Y., & Li, Y. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2022.3225329 · Cited by 10
“head self-attention mechanism [37], [38], [39], [40], to encode bug features.”
BackgroundConsE: Consistency Exploitation for Semi-Supervised Anomaly Detection in Graphs
Chang, W., Yu, J.-J., & Zhou, X.-J. (2023) · IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Network · doi:10.1109/ijcnn54540.2023.10191356 · Cited by 6
“Semi-GNN [32] and Player2Vec [35] adopt attention mechanisms to assign different weights to neighbors in the aggregation process.”
BackgroundMetaGAD: Meta Representation Adaptation for Few-Shot Graph Anomaly Detection
Xu, X., Ding, K., Chen, C., & Shu, K. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA) · doi:10.1109/dsaa61799.2024.10722838 · Cited by 11
“Semi-GNN [25] focus on the financial fraud detection problem with the multi-view labeled and unlabeled data.”
BackgroundMethodTwitter Bot Identification: An Anomaly Detection Approach
Alkulaib, L., Zhang, L., Sun, Y.-S., & Lu, C.-T. (2022) · 2022 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) · doi:10.1109/bigdata55660.2022.10020919 · Cited by 6
“In recent years deep learning techniques like reinforcement learning (RL), graph attention networks (GATs), generative adversarial networks (GANs), and graph convolutional networks (GCNs) have been used in anomaly detection [26]– [31].”
GTNet: A Tree-Based Deep Graph Learning Architecture
Wu, N., & Wang, C.-F. (2022) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2204.12802 · Cited by 6
“GRAPH Neural Networks (GNNs), a class of neural networks for learning on graph structured data, have been successfully applied in many areas to solve real world problems, such as link predictions in social networks [1], pattern recognition in autonomous driving [2], product recommendation and personalized search in E-…”
BackgroundFraud Detection: A Study of AdaBoost Classifier and K-Means Clustering
Mishra, A. (2021) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-247874/v1 · Cited by 6
“A graph based on semisupervised model was proposed in [3].”
MethodWhen Heterophily Meets Heterogeneity: New Graph Benchmarks and Effective Methods
Lin, J.-H., Guo, X.-J., Zhang, S., Zhou, D.-W., Zhu, Y.-D., & Shun, J. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.10916 · Cited by 6
“Graphs are commonly used to model complex relationships across various domains, such as finance [50], social science [26, 48] and cybersecurity [16, 52].”
Self-citationExact Verification of Graph Neural Networks with Incremental Constraint Solving
Liu, M., Lu, C.-H., & Kwiatkowska, M. (2025) · World Congress on Formal Methods · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.09320 · Cited by 5
“Graph neural networks (GNNs) have been widely deployed in real-world applications, such as financial fraud detection (Wang et al. 2019; Motie and Raahemi 2024), autonomous driving (Casas et al. 2020; Cai et al. 2021), healthcare treat-ment (Li, Huang, and Zitnik 2022; Gao et al. 2024), and…”
SSHAD: Self-Supervised Hybrid Model for Anomaly Detection in Graphs
Modok, C. K., Nipu, M. H. N., Hasan, M., Biswas, M. E., Tanny, M. T. Y., Akter, A., Hossain, M. D., & Sultana, T. (2025) · International Conference on Next-Generation Computing, IoT and Machine Learning (NCIM) · doi:10.1109/ncim65934.2025.11159915 · Cited by 5
“In practical networked systems, such as social networks [3] and financial transaction graphs [4], [5], even a small number of anomalies, such as financial fraud, can result in significant losses.”
Kang, Y., Zhu, Y.-F., Wang, D., & Han, Z. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnse.2025.3543161 · Cited by 5
“Some key applications include social network analysis, fraud detection, and recommendation systems [43], [44], [45].”
Self-citationTraining-free Graph Anomaly Detection: A Simple Approach via Singular Value Decomposition
Zhou, C., Li, G., Weng, H., & Xiang, Y. (2025) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3696410.3714776 · Cited by 6
Li, K., Shi, B., Wei, J.-Z., & Dong, B. (2025) · The Web Conference · doi:10.1145/3696410.3714630 · Cited by 5
Rao, S., Han, Z.-C., Yin, H., Jiang, J., Zhang, Z.-T., Zhao, Y., & Shan, Y. (2025) · Emerging Markets Review · doi:10.1016/j.ememar.2025.101277 · Cited by 5
Effective Clean-Label Backdoor Attacks on Graph Neural Networks
Fan, X., & Dai, E.-Y. (2024) · International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management · doi:10.1145/3627673.3679905 · Cited by 5
CuckooGraph: A Scalable and Space-Time Efficient Data Structure for Large-Scale Dynamic Graphs
Fan, Z.-C., Cai, Y., Liu, Z.-R., Guo, J.-R., Fan, X., Yang, T., & Cui, B. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/icde65448.2025.00099 · Cited by 5
Narrow the Input Mismatch in Deep Graph Neural Network Distillation
Zhou, Q., Shen, Y., & Chen, L. (2023) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3580305.3599442 · Cited by 6
“For example, fraud and spam detection applications [23, 28, 38] need to identify malicious transactions or entities as fast as possible to provide high-security protection for user property.”
BackgroundGraph Neural Networks for Forecasting Multivariate Realized Volatility with Spillover Effects
Zhang, C., Pu, X., Cucuringu, M., & Dong, X.-W. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.01419 · Cited by 5
Trade less Accuracy for Fairness and Trade-off Explanation for GNN
Liu, Y., Zhang, X., & Xie, S. (2022) · 2022 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) · doi:10.1109/bigdata55660.2022.10020318 · Cited by 5
“…(GNNs) have been playing a pivotal role in many machine learning applications, such as molecule property prediction [36], fraud detection [17], [35], social network analysis [16] and recommendation systems [39], formulated as node classification, link prediction, and graph classification [6],…”
BackgroundNot all edges are peers: Accurate structure-aware graph pooling networks
Yu, H., Yuan, J., Yao, Y., & Wang, C. (2022) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2022.09.004 · Cited by 5
Li, S.-H., & Cheng, W. (2022) · Neural computing & applications (Print) · doi:10.1007/s00521-022-07492-y · Cited by 5
“[24] used a graph topology network constructed by combining semi-supervised GNN and hierarchical attention mechanisms, using multi-view labeled and unlabeled data to capture anomalous nodes and their suspicious nodes with high similarity.”
MethodTowards Fair Graph Anomaly Detection: Problem, New Datasets, and Evaluation
Neo, N. K. N., Lee, Y.-C., Jin, Y., Kim, S.-W., & Kumar, S. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.15988 · Cited by 5
Anomaly Detection in Graph Structured Data: A Survey
Lamichhane, P. B., & Eberle, W. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.06172 · Cited by 4
“…the GCN to detect fake reviews on e-commerce networks and claim that their approach is more effective and scalable than the normal learning methods like Logistic Regression, Random Forest, etc. SemiGNN [90] notes that there are very few labeled data compared to unlabeled data for fraud detection.”
BackgroundMethodA semi-supervised fraud detection model based on fuzzy graph neural networks
Liu, Z.-Y., Yu, H., & Luo, X.-F. (2026) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2026.115913 · Cited by 4
Learning Feature Encoder With Synthetic Anomalies for Weakly Supervised Graph Anomaly Detection
Zhou, Y., Xie, Y., Liu, F., Song, D., Zhu, C., & Liu, L. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2026.3656821 · Cited by 4
CamFD: Semi-Supervised Camouflage-Aware Fraud Detection Based on Dynamic Graphs
Ou, R., Zhu, K., Zhang, N.-N., Zhou, M.-C., & Jiang, C. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man & Cybernetics. Systems · doi:10.1109/tsmc.2025.3648571 · Cited by 4
“3) SemiGNN (2019) [42] proposes a hierarchical attention mechanism to capture node-and view-level information, enhancing the interpretability of the fraud detection model.”
Regime-Dependent Graph Neural Networks for Enhanced Volatility Prediction in Financial Markets
Kumar, P. N., Umeorah, N., & Alochukwu, A. (2026) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math14020289 · Cited by 4
“This innovation is beneficial in multivariate time series prediction [35], financial fraud detection [36], and other financial modelling frameworks in which specific market indices exert greater influence than others.”
Structure-augmentation and Attribute-aware Graph Contrastive Learning with Weak Information
Li, W., Yang, K., & Li, K. (2025) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2025.114015 · Cited by 4
Efficient relation-aware heterogeneous graph neural network for fraud detection
Li, E.-X., Ouyang, J., Xiang, S., Qin, L., & Chen, L. (2025) · World wide web (Bussum) · doi:10.1007/s11280-025-01369-5 · Cited by 4
“We compare our methods against eight state-of-the-art baselines: GCN [29], GEM [30], GAT [31], FdGars [32], Play2Vec [33], GeniePath [34], Graphconsis [35], SEMIGNN [36].”
Semi-Supervised Supply Chain Fraud Detection with Unsupervised Pre-Filtering
Moradi, F., Tarif, M., & Homaei, M. (2025) · International Conference on Computer and Knowledge Engineering · doi:10.1109/iccke68588.2025.11273335 · Cited by 4
“Wang et al. [19] developed a semi-supervised graph attentive network for financial fraud detection with substantial improvements.”
Chen, Y.-F., Chen, Z.-Y., & Amin, H. U. (2025) · Knowledge and Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10115-025-02494-3 · Cited by 4
“To tackle these challenges, recent AML research has increasingly focused on semi-supervised learning approaches [2, 23, 41–43 , 46 ].”
FinGuard-GNN: Dynamic Graph Neural Network Framework for Financial Fraud Detection
Huang, R. (2025) · Frontiers in Business, Economics and Management · doi:10.54097/wh6hg844 · Cited by 4
“In recent years, the rapid evolution of financial technology has catalyzed unprecedented growth in digital payments, online lending, and cryptocurrency transactions, injecting new vitality into economic development [1, 2].”
Adaptive Reliable Defense Graph for Multi-Channel Robust GCN
Zhang, X., & Bao, P. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2025.3538645 · Cited by 4
“G RAPHS are ubiquitous data structures in the real world, such as social [1], [2], e-commerce [3], and financial [4] networks.”
UnifiedGT: Towards a Universal Framework of Transformers in Large-Scale Graph Learning
Lin, J., Guo, X., Zhang, S., Zhou, D., Zhu, Y., & Shun, J. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata62323.2024.10825327 · Cited by 4
“Graph neural networks (GNNs) have become an important paradigm for learning in structured data in many high-impact domains, including biology [1], chemistry [2, 3], and finance [4].”
Self-citationIndividual Fairness in Graphs Using Local and Global Structural Information
Sium, Y., Li, Q., & Varshney, K. R. (2024) · AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society · doi:10.1609/aies.v7i1.31731 · Cited by 4
“…such as loan approval systems and recommender systems, researchers have performed significant work to measure the fairness of those systems (Wang et al. 2019; Fu et al. 2020; Leonhardt, Anand, and Khosla 2018; Navarin, Oneto, and Donini 2020; Kleindessner et al. 2019; Horowitz and Kamvar…”
CausalFD: causal invariance-based fraud detection against camouflaged preference
Song, Y., Wei, Y.-C., Yuan, H.-N., Sun, Q.-Y., Fu, X., Wang, L.-E., & Li, X. (2024) · International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/s13042-024-02209-0 · Cited by 4
Enhancing GNN-based Fraud Detector via Semantic Extraction and Max-Representation-Margin
Zhang, B.-Z., Wang, X.-Y., Yu, Z., Zhang, Y., He, C., Deng, S., Luo, Z., & Duan, L. (2023) · Industrial Conference on Data Mining · doi:10.1109/icdm58522.2023.00202 · Cited by 4
“Fraud detection aims to identify fraudsters from a large number of users, such as, identifying spam reviews on the review website [3] and exposing illegal transactions in the trading system [4].”
BackgroundAddressing the Impact of Localized Training Data in Graph Neural Networks
Akansha, A. (2023) · 2023 7th International Conference on Computer Applications in Electrical Engineering-Recent Advances (CERA) · doi:10.1109/cera59325.2023.10455308 · Cited by 4
“For instance, anomaly detection or spam detection [37], [38] tasks can suffer greatly when the labeling process is biased or influenced by human subjectivity.”
BackgroundLoan Fraud Users Detection in Online Lending Leveraging Multiple Data Views
Zhao, S., Huang, Y.-R., Chen, L., Wang, C., Li, S.-J., Chen, L., & Pan, G. (2023) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v37i4.25675 · Cited by 4
“Detecting fraud users (Hu et al. 2019; Liu et al. 2018; Wang et al. 2019; Cheng et al. 2020; Jiang, Ni, and Wang 2021; Zhang et al. 2022; Wang et al. 2019; Zhan and Yin 2018; Qian et al. 2021; Wang et al. 2021; Tolstyakov and Mamedova 2021; Yang et al. 2022) is a crucial part of risk forecasting.”
BackgroundGPatcher: A Simple and Adaptive MLP Model for Alleviating Graph Heterophily
Zhang, S., Wang, H.-H., Zhang, S., & Zhou, D. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.14340 · Cited by 4
“Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have emerged as powerful tools for learning graph-structured data in various domains, such as biology [1], chemisty [2, 3], finance [4], natural language processing [5], and computer vision [6, 7].”
BackgroundFeature difference-aware graph neural network for telecommunication fraud detection
Wang, Y., Chen, H., Liu, S., Li, X., & Hu, Y. (2023) · Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.3233/jifs-221893 · Cited by 3
Efficient Fair Graph Representation Learning Using a Multi-level Framework
He, Y., Gurukar, S., & Parthasarathy, S. (2023) · The Web Conference · doi:10.1145/3543873.3587369 · Cited by 4
“Background: Graph representation learning models have been widely utilized in real-world applications, such as crime forecasting [10] and fraud detection [18].”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, D., Lin, J., Cui, P., Jia, Q., Wang, Z., Fang, Y., Yu, Q., Zhou, J., Yang, S., & Qi, Y.
- Affiliations
- Ant Group (China) (CN)
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2020
- Pages
- 598-607
- ISSN
- 1550-4786 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2003.01171
- OpenAlex
- W3009901425
- Cited by
- 476
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 51 · 2025: 93 · 2024: 91 · 2023: 105 · 2022: 78 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 16
- FWCI
- 13.01
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Proceedings (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
- Keywords
- financial fraud detection, graph attention networks, semi-supervised learning, hierarchical attention, interpersonal relationships, user characteristics, interpretable prediction, Alipay
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review