The DOI matches its DataCite record; 28 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Semi-supervised Graph Attentive Network for Financial Fraud Detection
Open accessAbstract
With the rapid growth of financial services, fraud detection has been a very important problem to guarantee a healthy environment for both users and providers. Conventional solutions for fraud detection mainly use some rule-based methods or distract some features manually to perform prediction. However, in financial services, users have rich interactions and they themselves always show multifaceted information. These data form a large multiview network, which is not fully exploited by conventional methods. Additionally, among the network, only very few of the users are labelled, which also poses a great challenge for only utilizing labeled data to achieve a satisfied performance on fraud detection. To address the problem, we expand the labeled data through their social relations to get the unlabeled data and propose a semi-supervised attentive graph neural network, namedSemiGNN to utilize the multi-view labeled and unlabeled data for fraud detection. Moreover, we propose a hierarchical attention mechanism to better correlate different neighbors and different views. Simultaneously, the attention mechanism can make the model interpretable and tell what are the important factors for the fraud and why the users are predicted as fraud. Experimentally, we conduct the prediction task on the users of Alipay, one of the largest third-party online and offline cashless payment platform serving more than 4 hundreds of million users in China. By utilizing the social relations and the user attributes, our method can achieve a better accuracy compared with the state-of-the-art methods on two tasks. Moreover, the interpretable results also give interesting intuitions regarding the tasks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Semi-supervised approaches exploit partial labels but are constrained by the quality and distribution of labels.”
From A Survey of Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks for Cybersecurity Anomaly Detection (2025) · cites this paper as [68]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“SemiGNN [68] uses hierarchical attention over metapathdefined subgraphs for fraud detection”
From A Survey of Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks for Cybersecurity Anomaly Detection (2025) · cites this paper as [68]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“SemiGNN [68] introduces a semi-supervised graph attention network designed for fraud detection in financial systems. It leverages both labeled and unlabeled nodes and incorporates hierarchical attention over metapath-based subgraphs. This makes it well-suited for access fraud scenarios where only partial labels are available and fraud behaviors differ across user roles and access types.”
From A Survey of Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks for Cybersecurity Anomaly Detection (2025) · cites this paper as [68]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Operational environments further demand reliability, interpretability, and maintainability [68].”
From A Survey of Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks for Cybersecurity Anomaly Detection (2025) · cites this paper as [68]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946 · cited 1×
“In our model SemiGNN, we randomly initialize parameters and optimize the model with Adam [14].”
MethodXGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2939672.2939785 · Cited by 54,569 · cited 1×
“• Xgboost [28]: It is a tree-based model, which is very”
BackgroundSemi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks
Kipf, T. N., & Welling, M. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1609.02907 · Cited by 24,853 · cited 3×
“• GCN [24]: It is a deep graph neural network and each node’s embedding is ensembled by its own embedding”
BackgroundMethodVeličković, P., Cucurull, G., Casanova, A., Romero, A., Liò, P., & Bengio, Y. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1710.10903 · Cited by 12,107
node2vec: Scalable Feature Learning for Networks
Grover, A., & Leskovec, J. (2016) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2939672.2939754 · Cited by 10,926 · cited 1×
“DeepWalk [16] and Node2vec [17] propose to use the random walk and skip-gram to learn the node representations.”
MethodDeepWalk: online learning of social representations
Perozzi, B., Al-Rfou, R., & Skiena, S. (2014) · Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/2623330.2623732 · Cited by 10,123
LINE: Large-scale Information Network Embedding
Tang, J., Qu, M., Wang, M., Zhang, M., Yan, J., & Mei, Q. (2015) · Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/2736277.2741093 · Cited by 5,416 · cited 6×
“LINE [18] and SDNE [19] propose explicit objective functions for preserving first-and second-order proximity.”
MethodInfluentialMultimodal Deep LearningPreprint
Akkus, C., Chu, L.-Y., Djakovic, V., Jauch-Walser, S., Koch, P., Loss, G., Marquardt, C., Moldovan, M., Sauter, N., Schneider, M., et al. (2011) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2301.04856 · Cited by 3,745 · cited 2×
“Through several layers of non-linear functions to map the raw data into the high-level semantic space, it is easier to correlate multiview data [27].”
BackgroundStructural Deep Network Embedding
Wang, D., Cui, P., & Zhu, W. (2016) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2939672.2939753 · Cited by 2,845 · cited 1×
“LINE [18] and SDNE [19] propose explicit objective functions for preserving first-and second-order proximity.”
BackgroundSelf-citationLearning Convolutional Neural Networks for GraphsPreprint
Niepert, M., Ahmed, M., & Kutzkov, K. (2016) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1605.05273 · Cited by 2,315 · cited 1×
“Recently, graph convolution network based methods are very popular [24], [25].”
Method
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- [3][3] Quah, Jon TS, and M. Sriganesh. 'l 35.4 (2008): 1721-1732. -
- [7][7] Bose, I., and J. Wang. 'Data mining for detection of financial statement fraud in Chinese Companies.' International joint Conference on e-Commerce, e-Administration, e-Society, and e-Education. International Business Academics Consortium (IBAC) and Knowledge Association of Taiwan (KAT), 2007. -
- [21][21] Cao, Shaosheng, Wei Lu, and Qiongkai Xu. 'Grarep: Learning graph representations with global structural information.' Proceedings of the 24th ACM international on conference on information and knowledge management. ACM, 2015. -
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 477
RHGNN: Fake reviewer detection based on reinforced heterogeneous graph neural networks
Zhao, J., Shao, M., Tang, H., Liu, J., Du, L., & Wang, H. (2023) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2023.111029 · Cited by 34
Yang, D., Liu, J., Qi, J., & Lai, J. (2022) · International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis · doi:10.1109/sc41404.2022.00059 · Cited by 31
“Many applications such as recommender systems [13], [14], knowledge graphs [15], fraud detection [16], and drug discovery [17]–[19] have used GNNs to help them accomplish their tasks.”
BackgroundChen, C., Cui, J., Liu, G., Wu, J., & Wang, L. (2020) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.10180 · Cited by 31
“A key to fraud detection is to classify whether a user is a fraud user or non-fraud user [143].”
BackgroundMethodMachine Learning in E-Commerce: Trends, Applications, and Future Challenges
Dritsas, E., & Trigka, M. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3572865 · Cited by 31
“To mitigate this, semi-supervised learning techniques, which leverage small amounts of labelled data combined with a large volume of unlabeled data, have been integrated into modern fraud detection frameworks [12], [13].”
Enhancing Attribute-Driven Fraud Detection With Risk-Aware Graph Representation
Xiang, S., Zhang, G., Cheng, D., & Zhang, Y. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2025.3543887 · Cited by 29
“Index Terms —Fraud detection, semi-supervised learning, graph neural network.”
Adversarially Robust Neural Architecture Search for Graph Neural Networks
Xie, B.-N., Chang, H., Zhang, Z.-W., Wang, X., Wang, D.-X., Zhang, Z., Ying, R., & Zhu, W.-W. (2023) · Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.00787 · Cited by 28
Self-citationTowards Prototype-Based Self-Explainable Graph Neural Network
Dai, E., & Wang, S. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data · doi:10.1145/3689647 · Cited by 30
ALLIE: Active Learning on Large-scale Imbalanced Graphs
Cui, L.-M., Tang, X.-J., Katariya, S., Rao, N. S., Agrawal, P., Subbian, K., & Lee, D. (2022) · The Web Conference · doi:10.1145/3485447.3512229 · Cited by 28
“Graph structured data are ubiquitous and are widely used in social network analysis [29], financial fraud detection [46], molecular design [17], search engines [44] and recommender systems [36, 38].”
A subgraph-based knowledge reasoning method for collective fraud detection in E-commerce
Song, J., Qu, X., Hu, Z., Li, Z., Gao, J., & Zhang, J. (2021) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2021.03.134 · Cited by 28
Graph Anomaly Detection with Bi-level Optimization
Gao, Y., Fang, J.-F., Sui, Y., Li, Y.-Y., Wang, X., Feng, H.-M., & Zhang, Y.-D. (2024) · The Web Conference · doi:10.1145/3589334.3645673 · Cited by 27
“Likewise, Semi-GNN [56], CARE-GNN [17], and PC-GNN [34] construct multiple homo-graphs based on node relations.”
The Devil is in the Conflict: Disentangled Information Graph Neural Networks for Fraud Detection
Li, Z., Chen, D., Liu, Q., & Wu, S. (2022) · Industrial Conference on Data Mining · doi:10.1109/icdm54844.2022.00131 · Cited by 27
“Examples include [11], [15], [16] for review fraud detection, [2], [3] for fake news detection and [5], [6], [17]– [19] for financial fraud detection.”
A Noise-Resistant Model for Graph-based Fraud Detection
Liu, Z., Yu, H., & Luo, X. (2025) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2025.104198 · Cited by 28
DiffGAD: A Diffusion-based Unsupervised Graph Anomaly Detector
Li, J.-H., Gao, Y., Lu, J.-D., Fang, J.-F., Wen, C., Lin, H., & Wang, X. (2024) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.06549 · Cited by 26
“In the semi-supervised branch, Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) (Gao et al., 2024b; Wang et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2021a; He et al., 2024; Zhang et al., 2024; Chen et al., 2024b;a) have achieved remarkable success in detecting graph anomalies across various domains for its excellent representation…”
BackgroundFinancial Default Prediction via Motif-preserving Graph Neural Network with Curriculum Learning
Wang, D.-X., Zhang, Z.-Q., Zhao, Y., Huang, K., Kang, Y.-L., & Zhou, J. (2023) · Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3580305.3599351 · Cited by 26
“[38] proposed a spatial-temporal model to detect both the structural and temporal signal for default user detection.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationJuryGCN: Quantifying Jackknife Uncertainty on Graph Convolutional Networks
Kang, J., Zhou, Q., & Tong, H. (2022) · Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3534678.3539286 · Cited by 26
“Graph Convolutional Network (GCN) has become a prevalent learning paradigm in many real-world applications, including financial fraud detection [45], drug discovery [19] and traffic prediction [7].”
BackgroundAction Sequence Augmentation for Early Graph-based Anomaly Detection
Zhao, T., Ni, B., Yu, W., Guo, Z., Shah, N., & Jiang, M. (2021) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3459637.3482313 · Cited by 22
“As the feature dimensions of users and items are usually the same or can be projected to the same space via linear transformation, we use X ∈ R ( 𝑚 + 𝑛 )× 𝑘 to denote the vertically concatenated feature matrix of X and X .”
MethodCounterfactual Data Augmentation With Denoising Diffusion for Graph Anomaly Detection
Xiao, C., Pang, S., Xu, X., Li, X., Trajcevski, G., & Zhou, F. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2024.3403503 · Cited by 31
“…balance the number of samples by over-sampling the minority class or under-sampling the majority class [12], [13], [14]; and 2) reweighting methods assign different weights to different classes or even different samples by cost-sensitive adjustments or metalearning-based methods [15], [16], [17].”
Graph Sparsification via Mixture of Graphs
Zhang, G.-B., Sun, X.-G., Yue, Y., Jiang, C.-H., Wang, K., Chen, T., & Pan, S. (2024) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.14260 · Cited by 25
“The superiority of GNNs stems from iterative aggregation and update processes.”
BackgroundλGrapher: A Resource-Efficient Serverless System for GNN Serving through Graph Sharing
Hu, H., Liu, F.-M., Pei, Q., Yuan, Y.-J., Xu, Z.-C., & Wang, L. (2024) · The Web Conference · doi:10.1145/3589334.3645383 · Cited by 25
“Today, GNNs have been widely used in online web services, e.g., social network analysis [9, 23], short-video recommendation [26, 53], shopping recommendation [40, 50], and financial fraud detection [28, 41].”
BackgroundMethodZhang, J., Lu, J.-G., & Tang, X.-H. (2024) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2023.127108 · Cited by 25
Wu, J., Hu, R.-M., Li, D., Ren, L., Huang, Z., & Zang, Y. (2023) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2023.10.019 · Cited by 25
Context-aware Graph Neural Network for Graph-based Fraud Detection with Extremely Limited Labels
Li, P., Yu, H., & Luo, X.-F. (2025) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v39i11.33319 · Cited by 24
An imbalanced learning method based on graph tran-smote for fraud detection
Wen, J., Tang, X.-H., & Lu, J.-G. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-67550-4 · Cited by 24
Churn prediction methods based on mutual customer interdependence
Ljubičić, K., Merćep, A., & Kostanjčar, Z. (2023) · Journal of Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.jocs.2022.101940 · Cited by 24
TGOpt: Redundancy-Aware Optimizations for Temporal Graph Attention Networks
Wang, Y., & Mendis, C. (2023) · ACM SIGPLAN Symposium on Principles & Practice of Parallel Programming · doi:10.1145/3572848.3577490 · Cited by 24
“Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) [24] have gained rapid adoption across a wide range of application domains, including social network analysis [40], financial fraud detection [4, 30], and drug discovery [13, 27].”
BackgroundFraudAuditor: A Visual Analytics Approach for Collusive Fraud in Health Insurance
Zhou, J., Wang, X., Wang, J., Ye, H., Wang, H., Zhou, Z., Han, D., Ying, H., Wu, J., & Chen, W. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2023.3261910 · Cited by 24
“Previous studies are either conducted on homogeneous [6], [14] or heterogeneous graphs [7], [8], [15].”
Self-citationBaroud, S., Chokri, S., Belhaous, S., & Mestari, M. (2021) · FNC/MobiSPC · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2021.07.047 · Cited by 23
Transaction fraud detection via attentional spatial–temporal GNN
Khosravi, S., Kargari, M., Teimourpour, B., & Talebi, M. (2025) · Journal of Supercomputing · doi:10.1007/s11227-025-06983-8 · Cited by 22
“GNNs aggregate information from neighboring nodes to generate representations for central nodes, facilitating automatic feature learning that considers interactive connections between transactions [4–6].”
Cluster Aware Graph Anomaly Detection
Zheng, L., Birge, J., Wu, H.-Y., Zhang, Y.-F., & He, J. (2024) · The Web Conference · doi:10.1145/3696410.3714575 · Cited by 22
Wang, X.-Z., Guo, J.-Y., Luo, X.-F., & Yu, H. (2024) · Journal of Safety Science and Resilience · doi:10.1016/j.jnlssr.2024.05.005 · Cited by 22
Reinforcement Neighborhood Selection for Unsupervised Graph Anomaly Detection
Bei, Y., Zhou, S., Tan, Q., Xu, H., Chen, H., Li, Z., & Bu, J. (2023) · Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icdm58522.2023.00010 · Cited by 29
“It has gained increasing attention from both academia and industry in recent years for the sparsity of anomaly labels and the significant real-world applications [1], [2], such as financial fraud detection [3], social rumor detection [4], and computer network intrusion detection [5].”
Adaptive Neighbor Graph Aggregated Graph Attention Network for Heterogeneous Graph Embedding
Lin, K.-B., Chen, J., Chen, R., Yang, F., Zhang, Y., Lin, M., & Lu, P. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data · doi:10.1145/3616377 · Cited by 22
“In addition, there are other applications of heterogeneous graph embedding based on specific tasks, such as fraud detection [40, 41] and recommendation tasks [42, 43].”
BackgroundA Unified Framework of Graph Information Bottleneck for Robustness and Membership Privacy
Dai, E., Cui, L., Wang, Z., Tang, X., Wang, Y., Cheng, M., Yin, B., & Wang, S. (2023) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3580305.3599248 · Cited by 12
“Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have shown promising results in modeling graph-structured data such as social network analysis [17], finance [42], and drug discovery [21].”
BackgroundSelf-citationUser Behavior Pre-training for Online Fraud Detection
Liu, C., Gao, Y., Sun, L., Feng, J.-H., Yang, H., & Ao, X. (2022) · Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3534678.3539126 · Cited by 22
“Prevailing methods may be built upon rule-based systems [4] and supervised [36] or semi-supervised [38] learning techniques.”
MethodHsin, Y., Dai, T.-S., Ti, Y.-W., Huang, M.-C., Chiang, T.-H., & Liu, L.-C. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3199425 · Cited by 22
“Financial fraud includes credit card fraud [17], [19], [29], phone fraud [30], online transaction fraud [31], instant payment fraud [32], etc.”
BackgroundAnonymous Edge Representation for Inductive Anomaly Detection in Dynamic Bipartite Graph
Fang, L., Feng, K., Gui, J., Feng, S., & Hu, A. (2023) · Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment · doi:10.14778/3579075.3579088 · Cited by 21
“Inspired by previous work [41, 52], we design an S-Encoder that learns a compact representation of u from Ds for each partner mask M p .”
MethodEffective High-order Graph Representation Learning for Credit Card Fraud Detection
Zou, Y., & Cheng, D. (2024) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2024/839 · Cited by 21
“Recently, graph neural networks (GNNs) have been employed for credit card fraud detection [Wang et al. , 2019; Cheng et al. , 2020; Zhang et al. , 2024] and achieve remarkable success as GNNs can more accurately infer the fraud probability by capturing patterns within relational graphs.”
MethodDiskGNN: Bridging I/O Efficiency and Model Accuracy for Out-of-Core GNN Training
Liu, R.-J., Wang, Y., Yan, X., Jiang, H.-T., Cai, Z., Wang, M.-J., Tang, B., & Li, J.-Y. (2024) · Proc. ACM Manag. Data · doi:10.1145/3709738 · Cited by 21
Li, M., Zhang, Y., Zhang, W., Zhao, S., Piao, X.-L., & Yin, B.-C. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2023.3292145 · Cited by 21
“Graph representation learning and community detection are closely intertwined in network analysis, as graphs are widely used to model relationships between entities in various domains, including social networks [5], recommender systems [6], and financial risk control [7].”
BackgroundAccelerating Scalable Graph Neural Network Inference with Node-Adaptive Propagation
Gao, X., Zhang, W., Yu, J.-L., Shao, Y., Nguyen, Q., Cui, B., & Yin, H.-Z. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/icde60146.2024.00236 · Cited by 21
“The propagation and transformation process are integrated as a single GNN layer.”
BackgroundCertifiably Robust Graph Contrastive Learning
Lin, M.-H., Xiao, T., Dai, E.-Y., Zhang, X., & Wang, S. (2023) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.03312 · Cited by 21
“[2] Daixin Wang, Jianbin Lin, Peng Cui, Quanhui Jia, Zhen Wang, Yanming Fang, Quan Yu, Jun Zhou, Shuang Yang, and Yuan Qi.”
BackgroundFraud analytics: A decade of research
Bockel-Rickermann, C., Verdonck, T., & Verbeke, W. (2023) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120605 · Cited by 23
Online Spam Review Detection: A Survey of Literature
Li, H., Wang, X., Chen, H., & Xu, G. (2022) · Human-Centric Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1007/s44230-022-00001-3 · Cited by 24
A review of privacy-preserving research on federated graph neural networks
Ge, L.-N., Li, Y., Li, H., Tian, L., & Wang, Z. (2024) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2024.128166 · Cited by 20
Self-citationLearning to Undersampling for Class Imbalanced Credit Risk Forecasting
Chi, J.-F., Zeng, G., Zhong, Q., Liang, T., Feng, J.-H., Xiang, A.-X., & Tang, J.-Y. (2020) · Industrial Conference on Data Mining · doi:10.1109/icdm50108.2020.00016 · Cited by 20
“However, many overdue, fraudulent, and cash-out behaviors are inevitable on the platform [2], [3], [7]–[9].”
BackgroundGuardnet: an imbalance-aware graph neural network for fraud detection
Chen, Y.-H., Zhu, F.-W., Zheng, Z.-W., Ma, J.-H., & Zhou, B. (2026) · Data mining and knowledge discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-025-01181-9 · Cited by 19
“FdGars (Wang et al. 2019b) differentiates between scammers and regular users in Tencent’s App Store.”
Metapath-guided graph neural networks for financial fraud detection
Qian, J., & Tong, G. (2025) · Computers & Electrical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compeleceng.2025.110428 · Cited by 24
AnomalyLLM: Few-Shot Anomaly Edge Detection for Dynamic Graphs Using Large Language Models
Liu, S., Yao, D., Fang, L., Li, Z.-T., Li, W., Feng, K., Ji, X., & Bi, J.-P. (2024) · Industrial Conference on Data Mining · doi:10.1109/icdm59182.2024.00093 · Cited by 19
“Many studies have explored for few-shot learning, using techniques like meta-learning or contrastive learning [5, 20, 36, 38, 42, 46, 48].”
Transaction Fraud Detection via an Adaptive Graph Neural Network
Tian, Y., Liu, G.-J., Wang, J.-C., & Zhou, M.-C. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2307.05633 · Cited by 19
“On the one hand, there are many interactions among transactions [7].”
BackgroundCamouflaged Poisoning Attack on Graph Neural Networks
Jiang, C., He, Y., Chapman, R., & Wu, H. (2022) · International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval · doi:10.1145/3512527.3531373 · Cited by 19
“, malicious user detection in social media [7, 42], interest group discovery in recommender systems [14, 43, 45, 46], event prediction in service networks [28], to just name a few.”
BackgroundMethodFrom Unsupervised to Few-shot Graph Anomaly Detection: A Multi-scale Contrastive Learning Approach
Zheng, Y., Pan, J.-J., Tan, Y., Jin, M., Liu, Y., Chi, L.-H., Phan, K., & Chen, Y.-P. P. (2022) · Transactions on Graph Intelligence and Network Applications · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2202.05525 · Cited by 19
“Among semisupervised methods, SemiGNN [20] is a representative method that leverages hierarchical attention to learn from multi-view graphs for fraud detection.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialEnhancing Graph Neural Networks with Structure-Based Prompt
Ge, Q., Zhao, Z., Liu, Y., Cheng, A., Li, X., Wang, S.-Q., & Yin, D. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.17394 · Cited by 19
“Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have been widely applied in a variety of fields, such as social network analysis [5], financial risk control [26], and recommender systems [27], where both structural and attribute information are learned via message passing on the graphs [11].”
BackgroundHan, L., Wang, L., Cheng, Z., Wang, B., Yang, G., Cheng, D., & Lin, X.-M. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2025.3530467 · Cited by 18
“These entities can encompass various subjects, such as reviews on the website [24], [25] or transactions on a trading system [26], [27].”
Enhancing Multi-view Graph Neural Network with Cross-view Confluent Message Passing
Zhuang, S., Huang, S., Huang, W., Chen, Y.-H., Wu, Z., & Liu, X.-M. (2024) · ACM Multimedia · doi:10.1145/3664647.3681585 · Cited by 18
“They extend the convolution to non-Euclidean space and have become one of the hottest topics in numerous domains, including fraud detection [46, 59, 66], computer vision [31, 64] and other areas [12, 40, 56].”
Forecasting realized volatility with spillover effects: Perspectives from graph neural networks
Zhang, C., Pu, X., Cucuringu, M., & Dong, X. (2024) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2024.09.002 · Cited by 18
Safeguarding Fraud Detection from Attacks: A Robust Graph Learning Approach
Wu, J., Liu, X., Cheng, D., Ouyang, Y., Wu, X., & Zheng, Y. (2024) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2024/830 · Cited by 18
“Firstly, we select popular GNN-based fraud detection methods including GraphSage [Hamilton et al. , 2017], GEM [Liu et al. , 2018], FdGars [Wang et al. , 2019b], Graph-Consis [Liu et al. , 2020], CARE-GNN [Dou et al. , 2020], PC-GNN [Liu et al. , 2021], FRAUDRE [Zhang et al. , 2021], H 2 -…”
BackgroundEnabling Graph Neural Networks for Semi-Supervised Risk Prediction in Online Credit Loan Services
Tang, H., Wang, C., Zheng, J., & Jiang, C. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3623401 · Cited by 18
“KS value balances the models’ ability to catch more frauds (high Recall) and reduce the efects on normal loan applications (low Disturbance), which is the de facto standard in the ield of loan anti-fraud [18, 54].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAN-GCN: An Anonymous Graph Convolutional Network Against Edge-Perturbing Attacks
Liu, A., Li, B., Li, T., Zhou, P., & Wang, R. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2022.3172296 · Cited by 18
“As an illustrational example, in financial social networks, users and their social connections can be formed as a graph, and the credit of users in the graph can be predicted by GCNs [18].”
BackgroundWang, Y., Zheng, Q., Li, X.-D., Wang, L.-F., & Lin, L. (2025) · Expert systems with applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2025.129853 · Cited by 17
Gorle, V. L. N., & Panigrahi, S. (2023) · Multimedia tools and applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-023-17681-z · Cited by 17
“The main goal of fraud detection is to predict whether a given entity (anything from an object to a user to other things) will be involved in fraudulent activities or not [2].”
Fraud Detection under Multi-Sourced Extremely Noisy Annotations
Zhang, C., Wang, Q., Liu, T., Lu, X., Hong, J., Han, B., & Gong, C. (2021) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3459637.3482433 · Cited by 15
“Therefore, semi-supervised techniques [9, 47] are further utilized to conduct fraud detection, which can be viewed as a combination of the above two kinds of methods.”
MethodPatel, T., Kulkarni, C., Kole, D., Parikh, M., Keshava, R., & Purushothaman, R. (2026) · IEEE International Conference on AI in Cybersecurity (ICAIC) · doi:10.1109/icaic67076.2026.11395673 · Cited by 14
“Recent advances leverage graph neural networks [10], [11] and temporal models [12], but cannot leverage cross-platform fraud intelligence without violating privacy regulations [13].”
IN-GFD: An Interpretable Graph Fraud Detection Model for Spam Reviews
Yu, H., Liu, W.-X., Zhu, N.-J., Li, P., & Luo, X.-F. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tai.2024.3420262 · Cited by 16
“Semi-GNN [35] breaks down a heterogeneous graph into multiple views and combines features from various perspectives using an attention-based hierarchical fusion approach to identify credit card fraud.”
BackgroundLOGIN: A Large Language Model Consulted Graph Neural Network Training Framework
Qiao, Y., Ao, X., Liu, Y., Xu, J., Sun, X., & He, Q. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3701551.3703488 · Cited by 17
“Firstly, our method consistently outperforms the vanilla baselines trained with the original node features or the LM-finetuned node embeddings in most cases.”
Design of XGBoost prediction model for financial operation fraud of listed companies
Liu, Y. (2023) · International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management · doi:10.1007/s13198-023-02083-z · Cited by 16
“It has a higher detection accuracy and can provide a safer and faster financial fraud and fraud detection method in practical applications (Wang et al. 2019).”
BackgroundGraphFC: Customs Fraud Detection with Label Scarcity
Singh, K., Tsai, Y.-C., Li, C.-T., Cha, M., & Lin, S.-D. (2023) · International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management · doi:10.1145/3583780.3614690 · Cited by 16
“For instance [48] addressed the homogeneity and heterogeneity of issue of networks for fraudulent invitation detection, anomaly detection on dynamic graphs with sudden bouts of increased and decreased activities is proposed in [10], [41] proposed a semi-supervised approach and an attention-based approach for fraud det…”
BackgroundMastering Long-Tail Complexity on Graphs: Characterization, Learning, and Generalization
Wang, H., Jing, B., Ding, K., Zhu, Y., Cheng, W. D., Zhang, S., Fan, Y., Zhang, L., & Zhou, D. (2024) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3637528.3671880 · Cited by 18
“The graph serves as a fundamental data structure for modeling a diverse range of relational data, ranging from financial transaction networks [7, 42] to social science [9].”
BackgroundGraph Generative Model for Benchmarking Graph Neural Networks
Yoon, M., Wu, Y., Palowitch, J., Perozzi, B., & Salakhutdinov, R. (2022) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2207.04396 · Cited by 16
“Various GNN models have been widely applied on a variety of industrial domains such as misinformation detection (Benamira et al., 2019), financial fraud detection (Wang et al., 2019), traffic prediction (Zhao et al., 2019), and so- 1Carnegie Mellon University 2Google Research.”
BackgroundFinancial Fraud Detection on Micro-credit Loan Scenario via Fuller Location Information Embedding
Jiang, J.-X., Ni, B., & Wang, C. (2021) · The Web Conference · doi:10.1145/3442442.3451372 · Cited by 16
“[25] utilized the multi-view labeled and unlabeled data for fraud detection, by expanding the labeled data through their social relations to the unlabeled data and proposing a semi-supervised attentive GNN.”
MethodDynamic graph neural networks for enhanced volatility prediction in financial markets
Kumar, P. N., Umeorah, N., & Alochukwu, A. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.16858 · Cited by 15
“This innovation has made GATs particularly useful in applications in multivariate time series prediction [38], financial fraud detection [37] and in other financial modeling framework, where some market indices have a more significant influence on others.”
MethodTGLite: A Lightweight Programming Framework for Continuous-Time Temporal Graph Neural Networks
Wang, Y., & Mendis, C. (2024) · International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems · doi:10.1145/3620665.3640414 · Cited by 15
“Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) [22] have emerged as a powerful paradigm for representation learning and predictive modeling on graph-structured data across various problem domains [2, 8, 25, 27, 35].”
BackgroundFew-shot Message-Enhanced Contrastive Learning for Graph Anomaly Detection
Xu, F., Wang, N., Wen, X., Gao, M., Guo, C., & Zhao, X. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems (ICPADS) · doi:10.1109/icpads60453.2023.00051 · Cited by 19
“SemiGNN [14] utilizes a hierarchical attention mechanism to better associate different neighbors and different views.”
BackgroundMethodFraud-Agents Detection in Online Microfinance: A Large-Scale Empirical Study
Wu, Y., Xie, Z., Ji, S.-L., Liu, Z., Zhang, X.-H., Lin, C., Deng, S.-G., Zhou, J., Wang, T., & Beyah, R. A. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing · doi:10.1109/tdsc.2022.3151132 · Cited by 15
“[38] proposed a semi-supervised attentive graph neural network to utilize the social relations in the multi-view labeled and unlabeled data for fraud detection.”
BackgroundSelf-citationA graph-powered large-scale fraud detection system
Li, Z., Wang, B., Huang, J., Jin, Y., Xu, Z.-H., Zhang, J., & Gao, J.-Q. (2023) · International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/s13042-023-01786-w · Cited by 15
“For example, Wang et al. [28] linked the labeled and unlabeled data via their social relations and proposed a semi-supvervised graph attentive network to utilize the multi-view labeled and unlabeled data for fraud detection, moreover, the work designed a hierarchical attention mechanism to better…”
Mining Mobile Network Fraudsters with Augmented Graph Neural Networks
Hu, X., Chen, H., Chen, H., Li, X., Zhang, J., & Liu, S. (2023) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e25010150 · Cited by 19
“We choose FdGars [26], GraphConsis [35], GEM [27], SemiGNN [31], and BTG [6] as state-of-the-art GNN-based fraud detectors.”
Fetaji, B., Fetaji, M., Hasan, A., Rexhepi, S., & Armenski, G. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3547285 · Cited by 15
“Out of ∼ 310 initially screened articles, 29 were deemed relevant for synergy-based BFSI contexts (see [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28].”
Simplicial SMOTE: Oversampling Solution to the Imbalanced Learning Problem
Kachan, O., Savchenko, A. V., & Gusev, G. (2025) · Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3690624.3709268 · Cited by 14
“Many problems in data analysis are inherently imbalanced in areas such as finance (fraud detection) [36], marketing (churn prediction) [24], medicine (medical diagnosis) [18], industry (predictive maintenance) [34], image recognition [32, 33], etc.”
Friend or Foe? Mining Suspicious Behavior via Graph Capsule Infomax Detector against Fraudsters
Zheng, X.-P., Wu, B., Liang, X., & Li, W. (2024) · The Web Conference · doi:10.1145/3589334.3645706 · Cited by 14
“SemiGNN [37] used a hierarchical attention mechanism to correlate different neighbors better.”
BackgroundMethodCoupling Graph Neural Networks with Fractional Order Continuous Dynamics: A Robustness Study
Kang, Q., Zhao, K., Song, Y., Xie, Y., Zhao, Y.-N., Wang, S.-J., She, R., & Tay, W.-P. (2024) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2401.04331 · Cited by 14
“In real-world scenarios, it is common for data to be perturbed during the training or testing phases (Dai et al. 2023; Wang et al. 2019), highlighting the importance of studying the robustness of GNNs.”
BackgroundEnhancing Graph Representations Learning with Decorrelated Propagation
Liu, H., Han, H.-Y., Jin, W., Liu, X.-R., & Liu, H. (2023) · Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3580305.3599334 · Cited by 14
“Due to their strong power in learning representations on graph data, they have achieved great success in many real-world applications such as recommender systems [8, 41], computer vision [19], drug discovery [7] and financial fraud detection [34].”
BackgroundEfficient Graph Neural Network Inference at Large Scale
Gao, X.-P., Zhang, W., Shao, Y.-X., Nguyen, Q., Cui, B., & Yin, H. (2022) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2211.00495 · Cited by 14
“The fraud and spam detection tasks require millisecond-level inference on the million-scale graph to identify the malicious users and avoid the property loss of the victim users [18, 21, 28].”
BackgroundFeature generation and contribution comparison for electronic fraud detection
Ti, Y.-W., Hsin, Y., Dai, T.-S., Huang, M.-C., & Liu, L.-C. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-22130-2 · Cited by 14
Online Learning and Detecting Corrupted Users for Conversational Recommendation Systems
Dai, X.-X., Wang, Z., Xie, J., Yu, T., & Lui, J. C. S. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2024.3448250 · Cited by 13
“Although there are works dedicated to corrupted user detection [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], they primarily operate on the premise of pre-existing user information in an offline context, rendering them ineffective for online detection based on bandit feedback.”
BackgroundMethodResultSelf-citationVecAug: Unveiling Camouflaged Frauds with Cohort Augmentation for Enhanced Detection
Xiao, F., Cai, S.-F., Chen, G., Jagadish, H. V., Ooi, B. C., & Zhang, M.-H. (2024) · Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3637528.3671527 · Cited by 13
“Graph-based methods [4–6, 9, 15, 17, 19, 21, 22, 29, 31] use predefined features like devices, IPs, and purchase patterns to connect users, but these features may not reflect behavioral similarity and are easy to manipulate by fraudsters [5, 22].”
BackgroundMethodTowards Heterogeneous Long-tailed Learning: Benchmarking, Metrics, and Toolbox
Wang, H.-H., Guan, W., Chen, J.-P., Wang, Z., & Zhou, D.-W. (2023) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.52202/079017-2327 · Cited by 13
“In the era of big data, many high-impact domains, such as e-commerce [1, 2], finance [3], biomedical science [4, 5], and cyber security [6, 7], naturally exhibit long-tailed data distributions, where a few head categories 1 are well-studied with abundant data, while massive tail categories are…”
BackgroundSelf-citationTransaction Fraud Detection via Spatial-Temporal-Aware Graph Transformer
Tian, Y., & Liu, G.-J. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2307.05121 · Cited by 13
“Machine learning-based methods usually resort to feature extraction [5].”
GUARD: Graph Universal Adversarial Defense
Li, J., Liao, J., Wu, R.-F., Chen, L., Zheng, Z.-B., Dan, J.-W., Meng, C., & Wang, W.-Q. (2022) · International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management · doi:10.1145/3583780.3614903 · Cited by 13
“Graph structured data are ubiquitous in real world, with prominent examples including financial networks [24], molecular finger-prints [34], and recommender systems [28].”
BackgroundDo not ignore heterogeneity and heterophily: Multi-network collaborative telecom fraud detection
Ren, L., Hu, R.-M., Li, D., Wu, J., Zang, Y., Huang, Z., & Hu, J.-Z. (2024) · Expert systems with applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124974 · Cited by 12
RUSH: Real-time Burst Subgraph Discovery in Dynamic Graphs
Chen, Y.-H., Jiang, J.-X., Sun, S.-X., He, B.-S., & Chen, M. (2024) · Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment · doi:10.14778/3681954.3682028 · Cited by 12
Multitask Active Learning for Graph Anomaly Detection
Chang, W., Liu, K., Ding, K.-Z., Yu, P. S., & Yu, J.-J. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2401.13210 · Cited by 12
“It finds extensive applications in capturing high-risk entities and behaviors, including but not limited to spam detection [29], financial fraud detection [38], and fake news detection [11].”
BackgroundInfluentialPSP: Pre-training and Structure Prompt Tuning for Graph Neural Networks
Ge, Q., Zhao, Z., Liu, Y., Cheng, A., Li, X., Wang, S.-Q., & Yin, D.-W. (2023) · ECML/PKDD · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-70362-1_25 · Cited by 12
“Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have been widely applied in a variety of fields, such as social network analysis [5], financial risk control [26], and recommender systems [27], where both structural and attribute information are learned via message passing on the graphs [11].”
BackgroundFinding Misstatement Accounts in Financial Statements Through Ontology Reasoning
Chen, L.-M., Xiu, B.-X., & Ding, Z.-Y. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3014620 · Cited by 12
“Besides, some researches have also attempted to use genetic algorithm [45], evolutionary algorithm [46] and other methods [47, 6] to detect financial statements fraud.”
MethodLuo, X. (2025) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math13244018 · Cited by 11
A graph fraud detection model based on mutual information
Shao, Z., Yu, H., Wen, J., Liu, Z.-Y., & Qi, P. (2025) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2025.131972 · Cited by 11
Understanding the human element in scams: a multidisciplinary approach
Liu, X.-F., Ai, Y.-S., Jiang, L. C., Wang, X.-H., & Wu, Y. (2024) · Journal of IT Cases and Applications · doi:10.1080/15228053.2024.2439192 · Cited by 11
“However, the effectiveness of these measures is limited due to challenges such as class imbalance and model overfitting in detection algorithms (Wang et al., 2019).”
Graph Anomaly Detection with Adaptive Node Mixup
Zhou, Q., Chen, Y., Xu, Z., Wu, Y., Pan, M., Das, M., Yang, H., & Tong, H. (2024) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3627673.3679577 · Cited by 8
U.S.-U.K. PETs Prize Challenge: Anomaly Detection via Privacy-Enhanced Federated Learning
Asif, H., Min, S., Wang, X., & Vaidya, J. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Privacy · doi:10.1109/tp.2024.3392721 · Cited by 11
“In [40], the authors utilized both labeled data (users are labeled as fraud or not) and unlabeled data (social relations and attributes) and proposed SemiGNN to exploit the representations of users.”
MethodF2GNN: An Adaptive Filter with Feature Segmentation for Graph-Based Fraud Detection
Hu, G.-H., Liu, Y., He, Q., & Ao, X. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp48485.2024.10446523 · Cited by 11
“SemiGNN [24] proposes a hierarchical attention mechanism to detect fraudsters.”
BackgroundMIDLG: Mutual Information based Dual Level GNN for Transaction Fraud Complaint Verification
Zheng, W., Xu, B.-B., Lu, E., Li, Y., Cao, Q., Zong, X., & Shen, H.-W. (2023) · Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3580305.3599865 · Cited by 11
“People bring in the graph methods to model complex relational data in fraud detection scenarios[3, 6, 12, 17, 18, 21, 22, 26, 33, 35, 47].”
MethodBTextCAN: Consumer fraud detection via group perception
Lai, S., Wu, J., Ma, Z., & Ye, C. (2023) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103307 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, D., Lin, J., Cui, P., Jia, Q., Wang, Z., Fang, Y., Yu, Q., Zhou, J., Yang, S., & Qi, Y.
- Affiliations
- Ant Group (China) (CN)
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2020
- Pages
- 598-607
- ISSN
- 1550-4786 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2003.01171
- OpenAlex
- W3009901425
- Cited by
- 476
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 51 · 2025: 93 · 2024: 91 · 2023: 105 · 2022: 78 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 16
- FWCI
- 13.01
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Proceedings (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
- Keywords
- financial fraud detection, graph attention networks, semi-supervised learning, hierarchical attention, interpersonal relationships, user characteristics, interpretable prediction, Alipay
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review