The DOI matches its DataCite record; 28 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Semi-supervised Graph Attentive Network for Financial Fraud Detection
Open accessAbstract
With the rapid growth of financial services, fraud detection has been a very important problem to guarantee a healthy environment for both users and providers. Conventional solutions for fraud detection mainly use some rule-based methods or distract some features manually to perform prediction. However, in financial services, users have rich interactions and they themselves always show multifaceted information. These data form a large multiview network, which is not fully exploited by conventional methods. Additionally, among the network, only very few of the users are labelled, which also poses a great challenge for only utilizing labeled data to achieve a satisfied performance on fraud detection. To address the problem, we expand the labeled data through their social relations to get the unlabeled data and propose a semi-supervised attentive graph neural network, namedSemiGNN to utilize the multi-view labeled and unlabeled data for fraud detection. Moreover, we propose a hierarchical attention mechanism to better correlate different neighbors and different views. Simultaneously, the attention mechanism can make the model interpretable and tell what are the important factors for the fraud and why the users are predicted as fraud. Experimentally, we conduct the prediction task on the users of Alipay, one of the largest third-party online and offline cashless payment platform serving more than 4 hundreds of million users in China. By utilizing the social relations and the user attributes, our method can achieve a better accuracy compared with the state-of-the-art methods on two tasks. Moreover, the interpretable results also give interesting intuitions regarding the tasks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Semi-supervised approaches exploit partial labels but are constrained by the quality and distribution of labels.”
From A Survey of Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks for Cybersecurity Anomaly Detection (2025) · cites this paper as [68]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“SemiGNN [68] uses hierarchical attention over metapathdefined subgraphs for fraud detection”
From A Survey of Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks for Cybersecurity Anomaly Detection (2025) · cites this paper as [68]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“SemiGNN [68] introduces a semi-supervised graph attention network designed for fraud detection in financial systems. It leverages both labeled and unlabeled nodes and incorporates hierarchical attention over metapath-based subgraphs. This makes it well-suited for access fraud scenarios where only partial labels are available and fraud behaviors differ across user roles and access types.”
From A Survey of Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks for Cybersecurity Anomaly Detection (2025) · cites this paper as [68]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Operational environments further demand reliability, interpretability, and maintainability [68].”
From A Survey of Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks for Cybersecurity Anomaly Detection (2025) · cites this paper as [68]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946 · cited 1×
“In our model SemiGNN, we randomly initialize parameters and optimize the model with Adam [14].”
MethodXGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2939672.2939785 · Cited by 54,569 · cited 1×
“• Xgboost [28]: It is a tree-based model, which is very”
BackgroundSemi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks
Kipf, T. N., & Welling, M. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1609.02907 · Cited by 24,853 · cited 3×
“• GCN [24]: It is a deep graph neural network and each node’s embedding is ensembled by its own embedding”
BackgroundMethodVeličković, P., Cucurull, G., Casanova, A., Romero, A., Liò, P., & Bengio, Y. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1710.10903 · Cited by 12,107
node2vec: Scalable Feature Learning for Networks
Grover, A., & Leskovec, J. (2016) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2939672.2939754 · Cited by 10,926 · cited 1×
“DeepWalk [16] and Node2vec [17] propose to use the random walk and skip-gram to learn the node representations.”
MethodDeepWalk: online learning of social representations
Perozzi, B., Al-Rfou, R., & Skiena, S. (2014) · Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/2623330.2623732 · Cited by 10,123
LINE: Large-scale Information Network Embedding
Tang, J., Qu, M., Wang, M., Zhang, M., Yan, J., & Mei, Q. (2015) · Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/2736277.2741093 · Cited by 5,416 · cited 6×
“LINE [18] and SDNE [19] propose explicit objective functions for preserving first-and second-order proximity.”
MethodInfluentialMultimodal Deep LearningPreprint
Akkus, C., Chu, L.-Y., Djakovic, V., Jauch-Walser, S., Koch, P., Loss, G., Marquardt, C., Moldovan, M., Sauter, N., Schneider, M., et al. (2011) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2301.04856 · Cited by 3,745 · cited 2×
“Through several layers of non-linear functions to map the raw data into the high-level semantic space, it is easier to correlate multiview data [27].”
BackgroundStructural Deep Network Embedding
Wang, D., Cui, P., & Zhu, W. (2016) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2939672.2939753 · Cited by 2,845 · cited 1×
“LINE [18] and SDNE [19] propose explicit objective functions for preserving first-and second-order proximity.”
BackgroundSelf-citationLearning Convolutional Neural Networks for GraphsPreprint
Niepert, M., Ahmed, M., & Kutzkov, K. (2016) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1605.05273 · Cited by 2,315 · cited 1×
“Recently, graph convolution network based methods are very popular [24], [25].”
Method
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- [3][3] Quah, Jon TS, and M. Sriganesh. 'l 35.4 (2008): 1721-1732. -
- [7][7] Bose, I., and J. Wang. 'Data mining for detection of financial statement fraud in Chinese Companies.' International joint Conference on e-Commerce, e-Administration, e-Society, and e-Education. International Business Academics Consortium (IBAC) and Knowledge Association of Taiwan (KAT), 2007. -
- [21][21] Cao, Shaosheng, Wei Lu, and Qiongkai Xu. 'Grarep: Learning graph representations with global structural information.' Proceedings of the 24th ACM international on conference on information and knowledge management. ACM, 2015. -
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–477 of 477
A Survey of Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks for Cybersecurity Anomaly Detection
Jiang, L., Ryan, R., Li, Q., & Ferdosian, N. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.26307 · Cited by 13
“Operational environments further demand reliability, inter-pretability, and maintainability [68].”
Wu, Y.-J., Yan, B.-C., & Chen, B. (2026) · Proceedings of the 35th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management · doi:10.1145/3799682.3839912
“Graph Anomaly Detection (GAD) has emerged as a pivotal task in transaction monitoring and financial risk control systems, dedicated to identifying atypical graph entities (nodes and edges) that significantly deviate from global structures or local affinities [13, 20].”
Hybrid IF–GNN–IF Framework for Suspected Fraud Detection in Bank Switching Transactions
Muddin, Z., Jokonowo, B., & Afiyati, A. (2026) · Journal of Information Systems and Informatics · doi:10.63158/journalisi.v8i5.1799
“The preprocessing and transaction behavior feature extraction stages aim to improve the quality of data representation before anomaly detection and graph learning processes [10], [15], [16].”
The latent structure of diversification from relatedness and network embeddings
Sturm, N., Candia, C., Damásio, B., & Pinheiro, F. L. (2026) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0344958
“Closer aligned with the methodology used in this article is the literature on detecting irregularities in economic or financial networks, where, in order to incorporate structural information, node representations are used for downstream classification tasks [45–47].”
FRACTION: Fraud Explanation Generation via Agentic Graph Context Navigation
Soh, C., Hu, J., Li, Y., Chen, C., Liu, H., Zhu, Y.-J., He, H.-Q., Hooi, B., & He, B.-S. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.18023
Critical risk node identification in enterprise resource planning heterogeneous knowledge graphs
Chen, R.-Z., & Chen, J.-J. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-73477-9
Attribute–structure decoupled self-supervised learning for graph anomaly detection
Fu, Y., Li, J., Zhu, Y., Zheng, Z., & Chen, L. (2026) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2026.116677
Chen, Y.-F., Zhu, H.-Q., Xu, H.-X., Yi, C.-Z., Chen, Z.-Y., & Landa-Silva, D. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tai.2026.3698049
“Money laundering schemes typically involve coordinated interactions across multiple accounts and temporal sequences [34].”
ENDFraud: An efficient node-feature decoupling framework for fraud detection in low-homophily graph
Huang, Z.-C., Yan, G.-F., & Tan, W.-Q. (2026) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2026.116670
He, H.-L., Zhu, K., Hu, Z.-W., Wang, J., & Cheng, D.-W. (2026) · IJCAI/ECAI · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2026/801
“…PC-GNN [Liu et al. , 2021], CARE-GNN [Dou et al. , 2020], GAGA [Wang et al. , 2023], FRAUDRE [Zhang et al. , 2021], HOGRL [Zou and Cheng, 2024], DGA-GNN [Duan et al. , 2024]; and three semi-supervised ones: SemiGNN [Wang et al. , 2019], GTAN [Xiang et al. , 2023], RGTAN [Xiang et al. , 2025].”
Relation-enhanced anomaly detection via multi-view GNN
Luo, H.-T., Meng, X.-Y., Wang, S.-H., Zhang, W.-Y., Diao, Z.-L., Wang, Y., & Zhang, Y.-J. (2026) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2026.112757
Graph Unlearning for MLaaS: Toward Flexible Privacy Adjustment via Influenced Subgraph
Li, Y., Zhao, Y., Tan, Q., Wang, Y.-G., Wang, L., Wei, T., Zhu, M., Xu, K., & Zhao, Y.-J. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing · doi:10.1109/tdsc.2026.3715465
“G RAPH neural networks (GNNs) have been widely used across various graph-structured data domains, including recommendation systems [1], financial systems [2], [3], and bioinformatics [4], [5].”
Li, J.-Z., Yu, H., Huang, R., & Yang, S. (2026) · Journal of King Saud University: Computer and Information Sciences · doi:10.1007/s44443-026-01236-x
“…of internet-based systems and online services that encompass e-commerce platforms, social networks, and financial transaction systems has brought unprecedented convenience while also giving rise to sophisticated fraudulent activities (He et al. 2022; Kudugunta and Fer-rara 2018; Wang et al. 2019).”
Self-citationTrojaning the Alignment: Stealthy Backdoor Attacks against Graph Foundation Models
Lin, M.-H., Gao, Z.-C., Wang, Y.-L., Lu, H.-Q., Zhang, X., & Wang, S.-H. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.20991
“For example, a triggered fraudulent account could be aligned with a benign class and evade fraud screening [8], while attacker-chosen items could be surfaced to users in a recommender [6].”
Learning with Blacklists on Graphs via Prototype-Guided Dual-Frequency Filtering
Yu, H., & Liu, Z.-Y. (2026) · Transactions on Graph Intelligence and Network Applications · doi:10.53941/tgina.2026.100003
“Prior work [35] assumed feature similarity between neighboring nodes and utilized random negative sampling to create an unsupervised loss.”
Li, C., Li, Y., Song, Q.-Y., Gao, J., Duan, H., & Zeng, Q.-T. (2026) · Blockchain: Research and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.bcra.2026.100553
Baskar, D., Kishore, A., Daniel, C., & Dakshinamoorthy, M. (2026) · International Journal of Drug Delivery Technology · doi:10.25258/ijddt.16.60s.57
“As a result, they struggle to capture collusion, shared devices, synthetic identity rings, or coordinated merchant usage that manifest as structured patterns across accounts and infrastructure [8], [12].”
InfluentialA Big Data Framework for Identifying Coordinated Fraud Clusters through Behavioral Pattern Mining
Rao, P., Srinivas, D., Maheswar, B. U., Kumar, G. S., & Srinivasulu, C. (2026) · 2026 7th International Conference on Smart Systems and Inventive Technology (ICSSIT) · doi:10.1109/icssit69151.2026.11656404
“This absence of a relational awareness presents a structural blind spot for fraud detection systems [6], [7],[18].”
InfluentialFraud detection on dynamic graphs via temporal path aggregation
Lou, C., Xiao, Z., Luo, C., Hu, J., & Wang, Y. (2026) · Applied intelligence (Boston) · doi:10.1007/s10489-026-07355-2
BoostSAGE: A Weighted Ensemble Framework for Explainable Financial Fraud Detection
Zan, C. T., Maruyama, Y., & Beierle, F. (2026) · Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference · doi:10.1109/compsac69091.2026.00212
“Wang et al. [10] constructed user-merchant bipartite graphs and achieved 97% recall on e-commerce fraud by leveraging merchant reputation propagation.”
Park, D.-Y., & Ko, I.-Y. (2026) · ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data · doi:10.1145/3819586
“Representative examples include heterogeneous graph neural networks (GNN)-based fraud detection [57], graph attention-based modeling [55, 61], and dual-layer graph modeling for suspicious interaction patterns [45].”
Mahbub, M. J. A., Dipu, S. A., Hasan, R., Islam, M. F. U., Hasan, M. M., Tahsin, A., Alam, M. G. R., & Uddin, M. Z. (2026) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.3905
Fraud detection in Nigerian financial card transactions using a graph attention network
Akinwande, O. T., Bashir, S. A., Abisoye, O., & Adepoju, S. (2026) · Proceedings of the Nigerian Society of Physical Sciences · doi:10.61298/pnspsc.2026.3.295
“This is consistent with studies showing that GCNs can capture local graph topology for fraud detection [18, 19].”
Hu, R., Chen, Q., Xu, H., Wang, R., Jin, H., Huang, X., & Zhu, X. (2026) · Symmetry · doi:10.3390/sym18060968
“Anomaly detection in attributed graphs is critical for real-world applications such as financial fraud detection [10,11], cybersecurity monitoring, and social network analysis [12,13].”
Heterogeneous Graph-based Risk Assessment for Internet Financial Companies with Company Big Data
Liu, Q.-G., Qiu, Y., Jia, Y., Wang, Y.-F., & Wu, M.-G. (2026) · Big Data Research · doi:10.1016/j.bdr.2026.100620
A Comprehensive Evaluation of GNN Models for Fraud Detection in Blockchain Transactions
Chakraborty, N. R., Chowdhury, M. J. M., Rajaeian, M., Uddin, M. Z., & Biswas, K. (2026) · International Conference on Blockchain · doi:10.1109/icbc67748.2026.11575502
“Research has demonstrated that GNNs outperform traditional machine learning methods by capturing dependencies among linked transactions [15].”
L2IR: Revealing Latent Intent in Graph Fraud Detection
Guo, J., Weng, Z.-H., Liu, Y.-B., Qiao, Y., & Li, M. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.26040
“Modern online information systems, such as e-commerce platforms, review communities, social networks, and financial services, generate rich relational data among users, items, content, and transactions [2, 20, 28, 32].”
FedEBM: Robust graph federated learning via energy-based model
Wang, J., Wang, J., Gan, Z., Li, X., & Li, D. (2026) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2026.109193 · Cited by 1
Behşi, Z., Kaya, K., Memiş, E. Ç., Ertuğrul, S., Karamanlı, H., Drias, Y., Son-Turan, S., & Çakar, T. (2026) · International Conference on Machine Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/icmlt69916.2026.11688530
“Wang et al. [7] developed SemiGNN, a semi-supervised graph attentive network deployed on Alipay with 4 million labeled and 100 million unlabeled users, demonstrating scalability through hierarchical attention mechanisms.”
Graph Convolutional Networks Detect Suspicious Transaction Patterns in Banking Systems
Han, X., Sun, T.-J., & Zhang, X.-G. (2026) · Asian Business Research Journal · doi:10.55220/2576-6759.921
TaxRadar: AI-Driven Detection of Unreported Use Tax in E-Commerce
Kumar, M. (2026) · Journal of Information Systems Engineering & Management · doi:10.52783/jisem.v11i3s.15131
“Wang et al. [17] applied GNNs to anti-money laundering with state-of-the-art results on the Elliptic Bitcoin dataset.”
Leveraging community context and frequency-adaptive aggregation for robust fraud detection
Zhang, Z., Wan, J., Liu, J., Zhou, M.-Y., Lu, K.-Z., Tessone, C. J., Chen, G., & Liao, H. (2026) · Engineering applications of artificial intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2026.114154
An Empirical Evaluation of Confidence-Guided Selective Fusion for Credit Card Fraud Detection
Rashid, M., Shanthan, H., & Arputharaj, V. (2026) · 2026 International Conference on Trends in Quantum Computing and Emerging Business Technologies (TQCEBT) · doi:10.1109/tqcebt67648.2026.11681067
“Wang et al. [22] built a transaction graph and used Graph Neural Networks, which obtained more detection performance on financial networks, especially against organised fraud rings.”
GUS: A Graph Utility Score Framework for Method Selection in Fraud Detection
Sidhaiyan, D., Bhatia, D., & Gopalakrishnan, S. (2026) · 2026 International Conference on Data Science, Agents and Artificial Intelligence (ICDSAAI) · doi:10.1109/icdsaai69492.2026.11505155
“GraphConsis [11] addresses the issue of label inconsistency among neighbours, and Wang et al. [10] apply graph attention to credit-card fraud in a semi-supervised manner.”
Surrogate as Teacher: Distillation-Guided Graph Poisoning Attack
Peng, X., & Xu, K. (2026) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v40i29.39668
“…on graph-structured data (Wu et al. 2020; Zhou et al. 2020), achieving remarkable success in domains such as social network analysis (Fan et al. 2019), recommendation systems (Wu et al. 2019), drug discovery (Bongini, Bianchini, and Scarselli 2021), and financial fraud detection (Wang et al. 2019).”
Kolmogorov–Smirnov learning by neural networks with a nonconvex surrogate loss
Fang, F., Wang, S., & Chen, Y. (2026) · Journal of nonparametric statistics · doi:10.1080/10485252.2026.2638780
“See Hand (2005), Anderson and Hardin (2009), Abdou and Pointon (2011), Roesch et al. (2016), Wang et al. (2019), Fang and Chen (2019), Alaraj et al. (2021) and many references therein, by way of illustration.”
Han, C., Li, A.-H., Chi, Y.-X., Wei, Q.-Y., & Shi, Y. (2026) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2026.114993
Graph Neural Networks for Detecting Anomalous Transaction Patterns in Enterprise Accounting Systems
Huang, Y.-T., Li, S., & Brooks, N. C. (2026) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.71465/fair651
“These architectural innovations have collectively established graph neural networks as state-of-the-art approaches for network-based fraud detection tasks [13].”
Balanced Anomaly-guided Ego-graph Diffusion Model for Inductive Graph Anomaly Detection
Wei, C.-Y., He, S., Wang, Y., Chen, Y.-G., Wang, Y.-H., Bai, B., Zhang, Y., Xie, Y., Zhang, S.-Y., & Wang, F. (2026) · Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3770854.3780240
Sharma, D., Mathur, R. P., & Sharma, M. (2025) · 2025 International Conference on Electrical, Communication, and Computing Technologies (iCONECCT) · doi:10.1109/iconecct67014.2025.11470253
“A semi-supervised GNN model [6] employing node-level and view-level attention by integrating labeled and unlabeled data significantly enhances the detection performance compared to the baselines.”
Lin, X.-Y., Luo, L.-Q., Lian, Z.-Y., & Lai, Y.-L. (2025) · 2025 3rd International Conference on Big Data, Information and Intelligent Engineering (BDIIE) · doi:10.1109/bdiie66302.2025.11735549
Pranav Krishna, S., S., H., M, A., Roy, S., Suneesh, N., & R., D. (2025) · 2025 IEEE 2nd International Conference for Women in Computing (InCoWoCo) · doi:10.1109/incowoco68239.2025.11407234
Credit Risk Prediction Based on SC-CTGAN for Imbalanced Datasets
Zhang, Y.-J., & Gao, Y.-J. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1109/ictai66417.2025.00059
“Subsequent studies, such as Wang et al. [3] in 2019 and Yang et al. [4] in 2019 and Hu et al. [5] in 2020, expanded the labeled data through their social relations to get the unlabeled data and proposed a semi-supervised model respectively to get a more accurate classification result.”
Singh, V., Barman, J., Kumar, S., & Jayadeva (2025) · International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics · doi:10.1109/dsaa65442.2025.11247963
“Traditional machine learning models are widely used but struggle to leverage the structural and relational information present in these networks [4], [5].”
SpiderWeb protector: a biomimetic defense against targeted attacks on graph neural networks
Huang, Y., Zhou, Z.-Y., Wang, Y., Lu, J.-Z., Zhang, S.-B., & Ding, Z. (2025) · Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications · doi:10.1007/s12083-025-02037-1
“…in the field of image processing with numerous citations [1], Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have recently emerged as a powerful framework for addressing graph-based learning tasks across diverse domains such as social networks [2, 3], bioinformatics [4], wireless communication [5] and finance [6].”
Beyond the Pre-Service Horizon: Infusing In-Service Behavior for Improved Financial Risk Forecasting
Liu, S.-H., Guo, Z., Ji, Z.-Y., Chen, Y.-G., Tang, Y., Wang, Y.-H., Zheng, X., & Ao, X. (2025) · Industrial Conference on Data Mining · doi:10.1109/icdm65498.2025.00054
RGCNs: Relational Graph Convolutional Networks for Trust-based Fraud Identification in SIoT
Rahul, Venkatesh, Malsawmtluanga, V., V., M, V., & Basavaraddi, V. S. (2025) · 2025 5th Asian Conference on Innovation in Technology (ASIANCON) · doi:10.1109/asiancon66527.2025.11281072
“Graph structures provide an improved representation of user behavior within their network context [6].”
TripleGraph: A High-Throughput Data Structure for Dynamic Graph Supporting Diverse Workloads
Li, S., Zhang, Y., Feng, Y., Zhao, Y., & Cao, H.-W. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on High Performance Computing and Communications · doi:10.1109/hpcc67675.2025.00088
“These applications include financial risk control, social network analytics [2], and e-commerce recommendation systems [3].”
Semi-supervised learning for linear extremile regression
Jiang, R., Yu, K., & Wang, J. (2025) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.01314
“Additionally, SS settings are increasingly relevant in many fields like image processing (Cheplygina et al., 2019), anomaly detection (Wang et al., 2019), empirical risk (Yuval and Rosset, 2022).”
Multi-Frequency Aware Reconstruction Model For Unsupervised Graph Anomaly Detection
Wan, X.-Y., Li, P.-D., Huang, Y., & Wang, L. (2025) · IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Network · doi:10.1109/ijcnn64981.2025.11228770
“For supervised GAD studies, some methods [15], [29] use attention mechanisms to differentiate between neighbors during message aggregation, while others [4], [17] employ sampling or resampling strategies or design specialized loss functions [35], [36].”
Zhi, L., & Wang, W. (2025) · Journal of Decision Making and Healthcare · doi:10.69829/jdmh-025-0201-ta03
“Wang et al. [10] proposed a semi-supervised attention graph neural network, which incorporated a hierarchical attention mechanism to enhance model interpretability and fraud detection performance.”
Research on Financial Statement Anomaly Risk Prediction Based on Generative Adversarial Networks
Zhang, M., Shi, P. F., Miao, Y., & Yuan, R.-P. (2025) · International Conference Civil Engineering and Architecture · doi:10.1109/iccea65460.2025.11102477
Saltos, C. A. U., & Cevallos, R. A. A. (2025) · Revista Científica de Informática ENCRIPTAR · doi:10.56124/encriptar.v8i15.014
Zhu, H., Zhong, W., Huang, Z., & Wang, Z.-Y. (2024) · Proceedings of the 2024 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Systems and Network Security · doi:10.1145/3714334.3714338
“The model integrated node-level and view-level attention mechanisms, and optimized the use of labeled and unlabeled data through specific loss functions [6].”
Self-citationAdaptive Neighborhood Sampling and KAN-Based Edge Features for Enhanced Fraud Detection
Batreddy, S., Pamisetty, G., Kothuri, M., Verma, P., & Babu, C. S. (2024) · BigData Congress [Services Society] · doi:10.1109/bigdata62323.2024.10824951
A Knowledge Engineering on Spam Review by using Selected Deductive Learning Approaches
Sripathi.S (2024) · Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis · doi:10.52783/cana.v32.2731
Path and Cost Based GNN Model for Social Media Network Fraud Detection
Devi, M. D. (2024) · Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis · doi:10.52783/cana.v32.5692
Graph Contrastive Learning with Adversarial Structure Refinement (GCL-ASR)
Chen, J., Guang, K., Yan, H., Li, Q.-Y., & Hao, T. (2024) · Industrial Conference on Data Mining · doi:10.1109/icdm59182.2024.00011
“Complex network data is prevalent in various real-world domains, including social media networks [1], financial transaction networks [2], and biochemical structures [3].”
Wei, C.-Y., Luo, X., Zhang, L., He, G., & Zhu, H. (2024) · International Conference on Advanced Cloud and Big Data · doi:10.1109/cbd65573.2024.00016
“Some methods, such as Fdgars [17] and GraphConsis [18], construct a single homo-graph contains multiple relations, while some others, e.g, GEM [19] and SemiGNN [20], convert the heter-graphs to multiple homo-graphs based on the node relationships.”
Graph Embedding-Based Fraud Nest Detection Method
Fu, G.-C. (2024) · 2024 International Conference on Image Processing, Computer Vision and Machine Learning (ICICML) · doi:10.1109/icicml63543.2024.10958126
Community anomaly detection in attribute networks based on refining context
Lin, Y., Xu, L., Lin, W., & Li, J. (2024) · Computing · doi:10.1007/s00607-024-01284-z
“In recent years, we have witnessed the appearance of a significant number of works on graph anomaly detection using deep learning techniques, such as [26–28].”
Industry credit spread forecasting based on time series data and industry relationships
Meng, F., Li, Y., Yu, H.-Q., Zhou, X.-F., & Huang, W.-B. (2023) · 2023 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW) · doi:10.1109/icdmw60847.2023.00178
“Recently, many studies introduce graph neural networks to capture the relation among the data samples in a variety of prediction applications[10-13].”
BackgroundResist Label Noise with PGM for Graph Neural Networks
Ge, Q., Yu, J., Zhao, Z., & Li, X. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.02116
“Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have been widely applied in a variety of fields, such as social network analysis Hamilton et al. (2017), drug discovery Li et al. (2021a), financial risk control Wang et al. (2019), and recommender systems Wu et al. (2022).”
BackgroundData-driven Analytics in Government Auditing: A First Look at Real-world Cases
Wu, Z., Mao, Y., & Fang, C.-J. (2023) · International Conference on Behavioral, Economic, and Socio-Cultural Computing · doi:10.1109/besc59560.2023.10386553
“It is also noteworthy that various studies have investigated the more broad category of auditing tasks such as financial statement fraud detection [17], financial distress prediction [18], tax evasion risk management [19], and so on.”
BackgroundGraph Inference via the Energy-efficient Dynamic Precision Matrix Estimation with One-bit Data
Tan, X., Shen, Y., Wang, M., & Wang, B. (2023) · International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management · doi:10.1145/3583780.3614898
Root n consistent extremile regression and its supervised and semi-supervised learning
Jiang, R., & Yu, K. (2023) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.07107
Heterogeneous Graph Tree Networks
Wu, N., & Wang, C.-F. (2022) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2209.00610
“Although Graph Neural Network (GNN) has demonstrated its success in many graph learning applications such as link predictions [1], [2], fraud detection [3], [4], personalized recommendations [5]–[7], and pattern recognition [8], [9], most existing GNNs are only applicable to homogeneous graphs with single type of node…”
BackgroundEasyGML: A Fully-functional and Easy-to-use Platform for Industrial Graph Machine Learning
Zhang, Z.-Q., Zhou, J., & Shi, C. (2020) · International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management · doi:10.1145/3340531.3417423
Self-citationAN-GCN: An Anonymous Graph Convolutional Network Defense Against Edge-Perturbing AttackPreprint
Liu, A., Li, B., Li, T., Zhou, P., & Wang, R. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.03482
“As an illustrational example, in financial social networks, users and their social connections can be formed as a graph, and the credit of users in the graph can be predicted by GCNs [40], [41].”
BackgroundDynamic graph rewiring for fraud detection based on one-class homophily
Yang, W.-Z., Xiong, X., Li, Y.-Y., Yu, Y., & Peng, C.-Z. (2027) · Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.is.2026.102815
Estimating Node Abnormalities From Imprecise Subgraph-Level Supervision
Peng, Z., Xue, Y.-Q., Wang, Y., Lin, Q.-K., & Shen, C. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnse.2025.3593338
“Supervised/semi-supervised methods[48],[49],[50],[52],[54]focusonleveraginglabeled normalandanomaloussamplestolearnpatternboundariesof bothcategoriestodetectanomalies.”
Quantum Computing for Insurance Fraud Detection
Bai, Y., Jiao, W.-Y., Ju, C., Feng, X., Lu, J., Qian, N., Kong, L., Ao, Q., Zhang, J.-J., Zhu, F., et al. (2026) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2026.3702708
“Other than the Leiden algorithm and the spectral clustering approach, deep-learning-based fraud detection is the dominant paradigm under intense study [52], [53], [54].”
LE-DCBFD: Link Enhanced Dice-Loss Consistent Balanced Fraud Detector Using Graph Neural Networks
黄, 辉. (2025) · Hans Journal of Data Mining · doi:10.12677/hjdm.2025.154026
GSINA: Improving Subgraph Extraction for Graph Invariant Learning via Graph Sinkhorn Attention
Ding, F., Wang, H., Chu, Z.-X., Li, T.-M., Hu, Z., & Yan, J. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.07191
“Extensiveempiricalexperimentalresults onbothsyntheticandreal-worlddatasetsvalidateitssuperiority.”
“As the development of GNNs in recent years, many GNN-based fraud detectors have been proposed [46, 45, 73, 74, 90, 91, 77], where FdGars [74], GAS [45], and ASA [77] adopt graph convolutional networks (GCN), a variant of GNN, while SemiGNN [73] and Player2Vec [90] adopt graph attention network (GAT), another GNN varia…”
BackgroundSun, Y.-F., Lan, L.-J., Zhao, X.-Y., Fan, M., Guo, Q., & Li, C. (2021) · Communications in Computer and Information Science · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-1160-5_38
Shen, H.-T., Yuan, Y., Wang, X., Liu, H., & Zhao, X. (2020) · Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-55393-7
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, D., Lin, J., Cui, P., Jia, Q., Wang, Z., Fang, Y., Yu, Q., Zhou, J., Yang, S., & Qi, Y.
- Affiliations
- Ant Group (China) (CN)
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2020
- Pages
- 598-607
- ISSN
- 1550-4786 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2003.01171
- OpenAlex
- W3009901425
- Cited by
- 476
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 51 · 2025: 93 · 2024: 91 · 2023: 105 · 2022: 78 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 16
- FWCI
- 13.01
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Proceedings (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
- Keywords
- financial fraud detection, graph attention networks, semi-supervised learning, hierarchical attention, interpersonal relationships, user characteristics, interpretable prediction, Alipay
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review