PreprintCited by 38Adversarial Robustness in Machine LearningPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in DataDigital Media Forensic Detection

Backdoor attacks and defenses in feature-partitioned collaborative learning

Open access
Liu, Yang, Yi, Zhihao, Chen, Tianjian·2020·arXiv

Abstract

Since there are multiple parties in collaborative learning, malicious parties might manipulate the learning process for their own purposes through backdoor attacks. However, most of existing works only consider the federated learning scenario where data are partitioned by samples. The feature-partitioned learning can be another important scenario since in many real world applications, features are often distributed across different parties. Attacks and defenses in such scenario are especially challenging when the attackers have no labels and the defenders are not able to access the data and model parameters of other participants. In this paper, we show that even parties with no access to labels can successfully inject backdoor attacks, achieving high accuracy on both main and backdoor tasks. Next, we introduce several defense techniques, demonstrating that the backdoor can be successfully blocked by a combination of these techniques without hurting main task accuracy. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematical study to deal with backdoor attacks in the feature-partitioned collaborative learning framework.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2007.03608

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Examples of adversarial attacks include data poisoning, model update poisoning, and model evasion attacks.

    “Examples of adversarial attacks include data poisoning [69, 319], model update poisoning [44, 67], and model evasion attacks [441, 69, 211].”

    From Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learning (2021) · cites this paper as [69]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Arjun Nitin Bhagoji, Supriyo Chakraborty, Prateek Mittal, and Seraphin Calo. Analyzing federated learning through an adversarial lens. In Kamalika Chaudhuri and Ruslan Salakhutdinov, editors, Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning , volume 97 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research , pages 634-643, Long Beach, California, USA, 09-15 Jun 2019. PMLR.
  2. Yang Liu, Tianjian Chen, and Qiang Yang. Secure federated transfer learning. CoRR , abs/1812.03337, 2018. · arXiv
  3. Jacob Steinhardt, Pang Wei Koh, and Percy Liang. Certified defenses for data poisoning attacks. CoRR , abs/1706.03691, 2017. · arXiv
  4. Chulin Xie, Keli Huang, Pin-Yu Chen, and Bo Li. { DBA } : Distributed backdoor attacks against federated learning. In International Conference on Learning Representations , 2020.
  5. Qiang Yang, Yang Liu, Tianjian Chen, and Yongxin Tong. Federated machine learning: Concept and applications. CoRR , abs/1902.04885, 2019. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, Y., Yi, Z., & Chen, T.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2020
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3041668106
Cited by
38
References
19
Citations by year
2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
Keywords
backdoor attacks, backdoor defense, malicious participants, federated learning, adversarial learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review