CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 2

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Two-Dimensional Quantum Walk of Correlated Photons

Jiao, Zhi-Qiang, Gao, Jun, Zhou, Wen-Hao, Wang, Xiao-Wei, Ren, Ruo-Jing, Xu, Xiao-Yun, Qiao, Lu-Feng, Jin, Xian-Min·2020·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2007.06554arXiv 2007.06554
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Quantum walks in an elaborately designed graph, is a powerful tool simulating physical and topological phenomena, constructing analog quantum algorithms and realizing universal quantum computing. Integrated photonics technology has emerged as a versatile platform to implement various quantum information tasks and a promising candidate to perform large-scale quantum walks. Both extending physical dimensions and involving more particles will increase the complexity of the evolving systems and the desired quantum resources. Pioneer works have demonstrated single particle walking on two-dimensional (2D) lattices and multiple walkers interfering on a one-dimensional structure. However, 2D multi-particle quantum walk, genuinely being not classically simulatable, has been a vacancy for nearly ten years. Here, we present a genuine 2D quantum walk with correlated photons on a triangular photonic lattice, which can be mapped to a state space up to 37X37 dimensions. This breaks through the physically restriction of single-particle evolution, which can encode information in a large space and constitute high-dimensional graphs indeed beneficial to quantum information processing. A site-by-site addressing between the chip facet and the 2D fanout interface enables an observation of over 600 non-classical interferences simultaneously, violating a classical limit up to 57 standard deviations. Our platform offers a promising prospect for multi-photon quantum walks in a large-scale 2D arrangement, paving the way for practical quantum simulation and quantum computation beyond classical regime.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2007.06554

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The authors introduced a novel approach to expand the dimensionality of photonic lattices by using the polarization degree of freedom as an additional synthetic dimension that is applicable to current approaches for increasing the vertices' connectivity in a spatial configuration.

    “We introduced a novel approach to expand the dimensionality of photonic lattices by using the polarization degree of freedom as an additional synthetic dimension that is applicable to current approaches for increasing the vertices’ connectivity in a spatial configuration (45, 46).”

    From Exploring complex graphs using three-dimensional quantum walks of correlated photons (2021) · cites this paper as [46]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Y. Aharonov, L. Davidovich, and N. Zagury, Quantum random walks. Phys. Rev. A 48, 1687 (1993).
  2. E. Farhi, and S. Gutmann, Quantum computation and decision trees. Phys. Rev. A 58, 915 (1998).
  3. A. M. Childs and J. Goldstone, Spatial search by quantum walk. Phys. Rev. A 70, 022314 (2004).
  4. A. Ambainis, Quantum walks and their algorithmic applications. Int. J. Quantum Inf. 1, 507518 (2003).
  5. C. D. Franco, M. M. Gettrick, and T. Busch, Mimicking the probability distribution of a two-dimensional Grover walk with a single-qubit coin. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 080502 (2011).
  6. M. Mohseni, P. Rebentrost, S. Lloyd, and A. A. Guzik, Environment-assisted quantum walks in photosynthetic energy transfer. J. Chem. Phys. 129, 174106 (2008).
  7. M. B. Plenioand, and S. F. Huelga, Dephasing-assisted transport: quantum networks and biomolecules. New J. Phys. 10, 113019 (2008).
  8. V. M. Kendon, and C. Tamon, Perfect State Transfer in Quantum Walks on Graphs. J. Comput. Theor, Nanos. 8, 422433 (2011).
  9. O. Mülken, and A. Blumen, Continuous-time quantum walks: Models for coherent trans- port on complex networks. Phys. Rep. 502, 3787 (2011).
  10. D. N. Biggerstaff et al. Enhancing coherent transport in a photonic network using control- lable decoherence. Nat. Commun. 7, 11282 (2016).
  11. A. M. Childs, D. Gosset, and Z. Webb, Universal computation by multiparticle quantum walk. Science 339, 791794 (2013).
  12. J.-F. Du et al. Experimental implementation of the quantum random-walk algorithm. Phys. Rev. A 67, 042316 (2003).
  13. M. Karski et al. Quantum walk in position space with single optically trapped atoms. Science 325, 174177 (2009).
  14. H. Schmitz et al. Quantum walk of a trapped ion in phase space. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 090504 (2009).
  15. Z.-G. Yan et al. Strongly correlated quantum walks with a 12-qubit superconducting pro- cessor, Science 364, 753 (2019).
  16. H. B. Perets et al. Realization of quantum walks with negligible decoherence in waveguide lattices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 013906 (2008).
  17. J. O. Owens et al. Two-photon quantum walks in an elliptical direct-write waveguide array. New J. Phys. 13, 075003 (2011).
  18. L. Sansoni et al. Two-particle Bosonic-Fermionic quantum walk via integrated photonics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 010502 (2012).
  19. H. Tang et al. Experimental two-dimensional quantum walk on a photonic chip. Sci. Adv. 4, 3174 (2018).
  20. H. Tang et al. Experimental quantum fast hitting on hexagonal graphs. Nat. Photonics 12, 754758 (2018).
  21. M. Gräfe et al. Biphoton generation in quadratic waveguide arrays: A classical optical simulation. Sci. Rep. 2, 562 (2012).
  22. A. Schreiber et al. A 2D quantum walk simulation of two-particle dynamics. Science 336, 55 (2012).
  23. M. Lebugle et al. Experimental observation of N00N states Bloch oscillations. Nat. Com- mun. 6, 8273 (2015).
  24. C. Chen et al. Observation of topologically protected edge states in a photonic two- dimensional quantum walk. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 100502 (2018).
  25. H. Chalabi et al. Synthetic gauge field for two-dimensional time-multiplexed quantum random walks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 150503 (2019).
  26. L. E. Estes, T. H. Keil and L. M. Narducci, Quantum-Mechanical description of two cou- pled harmonic oscillators. Phys. Rev. 175, 286 (1968).
  27. Y. H. Kim, Quantum interference with beamlike type-II spontaneous parametric down- conversion. Phys. Rev. A 68, 013804 (2003).
  28. C.-K. Hong, Z.-Y. Ou, and L. Mandel, Measurement of subpicosecond time intervals be- tween two photons by interference. Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2044 (1987).
  29. K. Mattle, M. Michler, H. Weinfurter, A. Zeilinger, and M. Zukowski, Non-classical statis- tics at multiport beam splitters. Appl. Phys. B 60, 111 (1995).
  30. F. Arute et al. Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor. Nature 574, 505 (2019).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Jiao, Z.-Q., Gao, J., Zhou, W.-H., Wang, X.-W., Ren, R.-J., Xu, X.-Y., Qiao, L.-F., & Jin, X.-M.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2020
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2007.06554
arXiv
2007.06554
References
13
Type
Preprint
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review