PreprintCited by 35Information Retrieval and Search BehaviorTopic ModelingMultimodal Machine Learning Applications

Generation-Augmented Retrieval for Open-domain Question Answering

Open access
Mao, Yuning, He, Pengcheng, Liu, Xiaodong, Shen, Yelong, Gao, Jianfeng, Han, Jiawei, Chen, Weizhu·2020·arXiv

Abstract

We propose Generation-Augmented Retrieval (GAR) for answering open-domain questions, which augments a query through text generation of heuristically discovered relevant contexts without external resources as supervision. We demonstrate that the generated contexts substantially enrich the semantics of the queries and GAR with sparse representations (BM25) achieves comparable or better performance than state-of-the-art dense retrieval methods such as DPR. We show that generating diverse contexts for a query is beneficial as fusing their results consistently yields better retrieval accuracy. Moreover, as sparse and dense representations are often complementary, GAR can be easily combined with DPR to achieve even better performance. GAR achieves state-of-the-art performance on Natural Questions and TriviaQA datasets under the extractive QA setup when equipped with an extractive reader, and consistently outperforms other retrieval methods when the same generative reader is used.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2009.08553

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some studies have investigated utilizing the model's predictions as supplementary context to inform the retrieval process.

    “some studies have investigated utilizing the model's predictions as supplementary context to inform the retrieval process (Mao et al., 2020;Li et al., 2022;Wang et al., 2023;Zemlyanskiy et al., 2022).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Danqi Chen, Adam Fisch, Jason Weston, and Antoine Bordes. 2017. Reading Wikipedia to answer opendomain questions. In Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) , pages 18701879, Vancouver, Canada. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  2. Rodrigo Nogueira and Kyunghyun Cho. 2017. Taskoriented query reformulation with reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , pages 574-583, Copenhagen, Denmark. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  3. Peilin Yang, Hui Fang, and Jimmy Lin. 2017. Anserini: Enabling the use of lucene for information retrieval research. In Proceedings of the 40th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval , pages 1253-1256.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mao, Y., He, P., Liu, X., Shen, Y., Gao, J., Han, J., & Chen, W.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • Microsoft (United States) (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2020
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3087273879
Cited by
31
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
Keywords
open-domain question answering, query expansion, text generation, BM25, dense retrieval, DPR, extractive question answering, Natural Questions, TriviaQA

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review