PreprintCited by 642Adversarial Robustness in Machine LearningSecurity and Verification in ComputingDigital Media Forensic Detection

Recent Advances in Adversarial Training for Adversarial Robustness

Open access
Bai, Tao, Luo, Jinqi, Zhao, Jun, Wen, Bihan, Wang, Qian·2021·arXiv

Abstract

Adversarial training is one of the most effective approaches defending against adversarial examples for deep learning models. Unlike other defense strategies, adversarial training aims to promote the robustness of models intrinsically. During the last few years, adversarial training has been studied and discussed from various aspects. A variety of improvements and developments of adversarial training are proposed, which were, however, neglected in existing surveys. For the first time in this survey, we systematically review the recent progress on adversarial training for adversarial robustness with a novel taxonomy. Then we discuss the generalization problems in adversarial training from three perspectives. Finally, we highlight the challenges which are not fully tackled and present potential future directions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2102.01356

Cites

101 of 101 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

29 of the 130 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Jacob Buckman, Aurko Roy, Colin Raffel, and Ian J. Goodfellow. Thermometer encoding: One hot way to resist adversarial examples. In Proc. of ICLR, 2018.
  2. Quanyu Dai, Xiao Shen, Liang Zhang, Qiang Li, and Dan Wang. Adversarial training methods for network embedding. In The World Wide Web Confer- ence, WWW 2019, San Francisco, CA, USA, May 13-17, 2019, pages 329-339, 2019.
  3. Takeru Miyato, Andrew M. Dai, and Ian J. Goodfellow. Adversarial training methods for semi- supervised text classification. In Proc. of ICLR, 2017.
  4. Ali Shafahi, Mahyar Najibi, Amin Ghiasi, Zheng Xu, John P. Dickerson, Christoph Studer, Larry S. Davis, Gavin Taylor, and Tom Goldstein. Ad- versarial training for free! In NeurIPS, pages 3353-3364, 2019.
  5. David Stutz, Matthias Hein, and Bernt Schiele. Confidence-calibrated adversarial training: Gen- eralizing to unseen attacks. In ICML, pages 9155-9166, 2020.
  6. Wang et al., 2020] Yisen Wang, Difan Zou, Jinfeng Yi, James Bailey, Xingjun Ma, and Quanquan Gu. Improv- ing adversarial robustness requires revisiting misclassified examples. In Proc. of ICLR, 2020.
  7. Yang et al., 2020b] Yao-Yuan Yang, Cyrus Rashtchian, Hongyang Zhang, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, and Kamalika Chaudhuri. A closer look at accuracy vs. robustness. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 2020.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bai, T., Luo, J., Zhao, J., Wen, B., & Wang, Q.
Affiliations
  • Nanyang Technological University (SG)
  • Wuhan University (CN)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2021
Pages
4312-4321
OpenAlex
W3191453585
Cited by
490
References
130
Citations by year
2026: 56 · 2025: 116 · 2024: 144 · 2023: 108 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 17
FWCI
36.73
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Research Foundation
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (U20B2049, 61822207)
  • Ministry of Education, India
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Security and Verification in Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
Keywords
adversarial training, adversarial robustness, adversarial examples

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review