Beyond Goldfish Memory: Long-Term Open-Domain Conversation
Open accessAbstract
Despite recent improvements in open-domain dialogue models, state of the art models are trained and evaluated on short conversations with little context. In contrast, the long-term conversation setting has hardly been studied. In this work we collect and release a human-human dataset consisting of multiple chat sessions whereby the speaking partners learn about each other's interests and discuss the things they have learnt from past sessions. We show how existing models trained on existing datasets perform poorly in this long-term conversation setting in both automatic and human evaluations, and we study long-context models that can perform much better. In particular, we find retrieval-augmented methods and methods with an ability to summarize and recall previous conversations outperform the standard encoder-decoder architectures currently considered state of the art.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
MSC is a human-human multi-session open-domain dialogue dataset in which speakers learn about each other across repeated conversations.
“MSC [27] is a human-human multi-session open-domain dialogue dataset in which speakers learn about each other across repeated conversations.”
From MRMMIA: Membership Inference Attacks on Memory in Chat Agents (2026) · cites this paper as [27]
OpenAI released a dataset, PRM800K, which resulted in a state-of-the-art reward model.
“Thus, OpenAI released a dataset, namely, PRM800K, which resulted in a SOTA reward model [153].”
From Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generation (2023) · cites this paper as [153]
The Introduction describes the authors’ Multi-Session Chat dataset and models for long-term conversation, not PRM800K. Searches for “PRM800K” and “process reward model” found no passage in our copy addressing OpenAI’s release or the claimed reward-model result. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe effectiveness of the system is constrained by the performance of the reward model itself.
“Since the effectiveness of the system is constrained by the performance of the reward model itself, emphasis has been placed on determining the most effective training methods [153].”
From Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generation (2023) · cites this paper as [153]
The Predicted summary models and 5.1 Human Evaluation sections discuss dialogue summaries and conversational performance, not a reward model. Searches for “reward model” and the claimed performance constraint found no passage addressing it; page numbers were not provided. (LLM, conf=0.73)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredMemory-augmented methods improve the memory capabilities of LLMs without requiring fine-tuning.
“Numerous approaches have demonstrated that memory-augmented methods improve the memory capabilities of LLMs without requiring fine-tuning, which is often impossible for API-based models [25, 42, 46].”
From CAIM: Development and Evaluation of a Cognitive AI Memory Framework for Long-Term Interaction with Intelligent Agents (2026) · cites this paper as [25]
Memory-augmented methods retrieve user-specific information from past interactions, addressing the limited context window and enabling integration of past information into the input prompt.
“Memory-augmented methods extend this concept by retrieving user-specific information from past interactions. This addresses the challenge of a limited context window and enables the integration of past information into the input prompt [25, 29, 45].”
From CAIM: Development and Evaluation of a Cognitive AI Memory Framework for Long-Term Interaction with Intelligent Agents (2026) · cites this paper as [25]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Lewis, M., Liu, Y., Goyal, N., Ghazvininejad, M., Mohamed, A., Levy, O., Stoyanov, V., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2020) · Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.703 · Cited by 8,821 · see citing works
On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big? 🦜
Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445922 · Cited by 6,988 · see citing works
Billion-scale similarity search with GPUs
Johnson, J., Douze, M., & Jegou, H. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Big Data · doi:10.1109/tbdata.2019.2921572 · Cited by 4,228 · see citing works
Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk
Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2010) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500002205 · Cited by 3,767 · see citing works
Dense passage retrieval for open-domain question answering
Karpukhin, V., Oguz, B., Min, S., Lewis, P., Wu, L., Edunov, S., Chen, D., & Yih, W.-T. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.550 · Cited by 3,575 · see citing works
Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks
Lewis, P., Perez, E., Piktus, A., Petroni, F., Karpukhin, V., Goyal, N., Küttler, H., Lewis, M., Yih, W.-T., Rocktäschel, T., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.11401 · Cited by 3,101 · see citing works
Longformer: The Long-Document Transformer
Beltagy, I., Peters, M. E., & Cohan, A. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.05150 · Cited by 2,281 · see citing works
Reading Wikipedia to answer open-domain questions
Chen, D., Fisch, A., Weston, J., & Bordes, A. (2017) · Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p17-1171 · Cited by 1,546 · see citing works
Self-citationReformer: The Efficient Transformer
Kitaev, N., Kaiser, Ł., & Levskaya, A. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2001.04451 · Cited by 1,435 · see citing works
MELD: A Multimodal Multi-Party Dataset for Emotion Recognition in Conversations
Poria, S., Hazarika, D., Majumder, N., Naik, G., Cambria, E., & Mihalcea, R. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1050 · Cited by 1,416 · see citing works
Personalizing Dialogue Agents: I have a dog, do you have pets too?
Zhang, S., Dinan, E., Urbanek, J., Szlam, A., Kiela, D., & Weston, J. (2018) · Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-1205 · Cited by 1,177 · see citing works
Self-citationLeveraging Passage Retrieval with Generative Models for Open Domain Question Answering
Izacard, G., & Grave, E. (2021) · Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Main Volume · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-main.74 · Cited by 1,109 · see citing works
Generating Long Sequences with Sparse Transformers
Child, R., Gray, S., Radford, A., & Sutskever, I. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1904.10509 · Cited by 1,063 · see citing works
A Persona-Based Neural Conversation Model
Li, J., Galley, M., Brockett, C., Spithourakis, G., Gao, J., & Dolan, B. (2016) · Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p16-1094 · Cited by 898 · see citing works
Towards Empathetic Open-domain Conversation Models: A New Benchmark and Dataset
Rashkin, H., Smith, E. M., Li, M., & Boureau, Y.-L. (2019) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1534 · Cited by 883 · see citing works
Baumgartner, J., Zannettou, S., Keegan, B., Squire, M., & Blackburn, J. (2020) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v14i1.7347 · Cited by 881 · see citing works
Neural Summarization by Extracting Sentences and Words
Cheng, J., & Lapata, M. (2016) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p16-1046 · Cited by 802 · see citing works
Recipes for Building an Open-Domain Chatbot
Roller, S., Dinan, E., Goyal, N., Ju, D., Williamson, M., Liu, Y., Xu, J., Ott, M., Smith, E. M., Boureau, Y.-L., et al. (2021) · Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Main Volume · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-main.24 · Cited by 784 · see citing works
Self-citationDailyDialog: A Manually Labelled Multi-turn Dialogue DatasetPreprint
Li, Y., Su, H., Shen, X., Li, W., Cao, Z., & Niu, S. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1710.03957 · Cited by 757 · see citing works
Towards a Human-like Open-Domain Chatbot
Adiwardana, D., Luong, M.-T., So, D. R., Hall, J., Fiedel, N., Thoppilan, R., Yang, Z., Kulshreshtha, A., Nemade, G., Lu, Y., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2001.09977 · Cited by 614 · see citing works
Wizard of Wikipedia: Knowledge-Powered Conversational agentsPreprint
Dinan, E., Roller, S., Shuster, K., Fan, A., Auli, M., & Weston, J. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1811.01241 · Cited by 610 · see citing works
Self-citationRetrieval Augmentation Reduces Hallucination in Conversation
Shuster, K., Poff, S., Chen, M., Kiela, D., & Weston, J. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2021 · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-emnlp.320 · Cited by 575 · see citing works
Self-citationSAMSum Corpus: A Human-annotated Dialogue Dataset for Abstractive Summarization
Gliwa, B., Mochol, I., Biesek, M., & Wawer, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on New Frontiers in Summarization · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-5409 · Cited by 424 · see citing works
Neural Text Summarization: A Critical Evaluation
Kryscinski, W., Keskar, N. S., McCann, B., Xiong, C., & Socher, R. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1051 · Cited by 335 · see citing works
Challenges in building intelligent open-domain dialog systems
Huang, M., Zhu, X., & Gao, J. (2020) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3383123 · Cited by 288 · see citing works
DailyDialog: A Manually Labelled Multi-Turn Dialogue Dataset
Li, Y. (2025) · TIB Data Manager · doi:10.57702/l9x4bl6j · Cited by 262 · see citing works
Training Millions of Personalized Dialogue Agents
Mazaré, P.-E., Humeau, S., Raison, M., & Bordes, A. (2018) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d18-1298 · Cited by 226 · see citing works
Memory fixation in the goldfish.
Agranoff, B. W., Davis, R. E., & Brink, J. J. (1965) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.54.3.788 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Learning to Speak and Act in a Fantasy Text Adventure Game
Urbanek, J., Fan, A., Karamcheti, S., Jain, S., Humeau, S., Dinan, E., Rocktäschel, T., Kiela, D., Szlam, A. D., & Weston, J. (2019) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1062 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Self-citationConversational AI: Dialogue Systems, Conversational Agents, and Chatbots
McTear, M. (2021) · Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-02176-3 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
A Persona-Based Neural Conversation ModelPreprint
Li, J., Galley, M., Brockett, C., Spithourakis, G., Gao, J., & Dolan, B. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1603.06155 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Recipes for Safety in Open-domain ChatbotsPreprint
Xu, J., Ju, D., Li, M., Boureau, Y.-L., Weston, J., & Dinan, E. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.07079 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Self-citationAbstractive Dialogue Summarization with Sentence-Gated Modeling Optimized by Dialogue Acts
Goo, C.-W., & Chen, Y.-N. (2018) · IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop (SLT) · doi:10.1109/slt.2018.8639531 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Automatic text summarization with neural networks
Kaikhah, K. (2004) · IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1109/is.2004.1344634 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Improving Neural Conversational Models with Entropy-Based Data Filtering
Csáky, R., Purgai, P., & Recski, G. (2019) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1567 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
West, P., Holtzman, A., Buys, J., & Choi, Y. (2019) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1389 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Anticipating Safety Issues in E2E Conversational AI: Framework and Tooling
Dinan, E., Abercrombie, G., Bergman, A. S., Spruit, S., Hovy, D., Boureau, Y.-L., & Rieser, V. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.03451 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Storytelling with Dialogue: A Critical Role Dungeons and Dragons Dataset
Rameshkumar, R., & Bailey, P. (2020) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.459 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Dial2Desc: End-to-end Dialogue Description GenerationPreprint
Pan, H., Zhou, J., Zhao, Z., Liu, Y., Cai, D., & Yang, M. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1811.00185 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
The Gutenberg Dialogue Dataset
Csáky, R., & Recski, G. (2021) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-main.11 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generation
Ji, Z., Lee, N., Frieske, R., Yu, T., Su, D., Xu, Y., Ishii, E., Bang, Y. J., Madotto, A., & Fung, P. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3571730 · Cited by 5,025 · see citing works
“[153] introduce a dataset consisting of over 40 utterances per episode on average.”
BackgroundUnleashing the potential of prompt engineering for large language models
CHEN, B. ‐., Zhang, Z., Langrené, N., & Zhu, S. (2025) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2025.101260 · Cited by 764 · see citing works
Siriwardhana, S., Weerasekera, R., Wen, E., Kaluarachchi, T., Rana, R., & Nanayakkara, S. (2023) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00530 · Cited by 337 · see citing works
“Using both parametric and non-parametric memory generally leads to reduced hallucinations and higher interpretability in tasks like question answering and summarization (Xu et al., 2021; Komeili et al., 2021; Guu et al., 2020; Lewis et al., 2020b).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialJo, E., Epstein, D. A., Jung, H., & Kim, Y.-H. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3581503 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
A Survey on the Memory Mechanism of Large Language Model-based Agents
Zhang, Z., Dai, Q., Bo, X., Ma, C., Li, R., Chen, X., Zhu, J., Dong, Z., & Wen, J.-R. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3748302 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
“Some previous works have constructed several datasets to support the evaluation of LLM-based agents [26, 191, 194], and some benchmarks also conduct evaluations on the memory capability of LLM-based agents [102, 182, 219].”
Sabour, S., Zhang, W., Xiao, X., Zhang, Y., Zheng, Y., Wen, J., Zhao, J., & Huang, M. (2023) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2023.1133987 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Conversational Information Seeking
Zamani, H., Trippas, J. R., Dalton, J., & Radlinski, F. (2023) · Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval · doi:10.1561/1500000081 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
“I’m sorry to hear that”: Finding new biases in language models with a holistic descriptor dataset
Smith, E. M., Hall, M., Kambadur, M., Presani, E., & Williams, A. (2022) · Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.625 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
“0 (Komeili et al., 2022; Xu et al., 2022), an encoder/decoder model pre-trained on a Reddit dataset extracted by a third party and made available on pushshift.”
MethodInfluentialIrfan, B., Kuoppamäki, S., Hosseini, A., & Skantze, G. (2025) · Autonomous Robots · doi:10.1007/s10514-025-10190-y · Cited by 75 · see citing works
“For personalizing daily interactions through recommendations based on dialogue history, retrieval and memory-augmented models (e.g., (Xu et al., 2022)), ‘in-context learning’ (Dong et al., 2023) and ‘chain of thought’ (Wei et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2023) (i.e., dividing the prompt into steps)…”
InfluentialShuster, K., Komeili, M., Adolphs, L., Roller, S., Szlam, A. D., & Weston, J. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-emnlp.27 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Self-citationLaMPost: Design and Evaluation of an AI-assisted Email Writing Prototype for Adults with Dyslexia
Goodman, S. M., Buehler, E., Clary, P., Coenen, A., Donsbach, A., Horne, T. N., Lahav, M., MacDonald, R., Michaels, R. B., Narayanan, A., et al. (2022) · Proceedings of the 24th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility · doi:10.1145/3517428.3544819 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Irfan, B., Kuoppamäki, S., & Skantze, G. (2024) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2024.1363713 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
MemGPT: Towards LLMs as Operating Systems
Packer, C., Wooders, S., Lin, K., Fang, V., Patil, S. G., Stoica, I., & Gonzalez, J. E. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.08560 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
“I understand that you’re studying computer science and have a keen interest in pretty dynamic areas like Formula 1 and sailing.”
BackgroundGenerative Spoken Dialogue Language Modeling
Nguyen, T. A., Kharitonov, E., Copet, J., Adi, Y., Hsu, W.-N., Elkahky, A. M., Tomasello, P., Algayres, R., Sagot, B., Mohamed, A., et al. (2023) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00545 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
“More recent research focused on utilizing retrieval augmented generation methods (Lewis et al., 2020) for long-context, multi-session conversations (Xu et al., 2021), and grounding responses on fresh information from the internet (Komeili et al., 2021; Shuster et al., 2022).”
BackgroundRecursively summarizing enables long-term dialogue memory in large language models
Wang, Q., Fu, Y., Cao, Y., Wang, S., Tian, Z., & Ding, L. (2025) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2025.130193 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Towards Continual Knowledge Learning of Language Models
Jang, J., Ye, S., Yang, S., Shin, J., Han, J., Kim, G., Choi, S. J., & Seo, M. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.03215 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
DialFact: A Benchmark for Fact-Checking in Dialogue
Gupta, P., Wu, C.-S., Liu, W., & Xiong, C. (2022) · Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.263 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Few-Shot Bot: Prompt-Based Learning for Dialogue SystemsPreprint
Madotto, A., Lin, Z., Winata, G. I., & Fung, P. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.08118 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
“Different methods for avoiding inappropriate responses have been proposed (Dinan et al., 2020), especially by generating adversarial examples (Dinan et al., 2019; Xu et al., 2021a).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSmith, E., Hsu, O., Qian, R., Roller, S., Boureau, Y.-L., & Weston, J. (2022) · Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on NLP for Conversational AI · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.nlp4convai-1.8 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Self-citationMemory Sandbox: Transparent and Interactive Memory Management for Conversational Agents
Huang, Z., Gutierrez, S., Kamana, H., & Macneil, S. (2023) · Adjunct Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology · doi:10.1145/3586182.3615796 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
“This makes it difficult for users to repair conversational breakdowns that happen when there is a misalignment between how the agent manages the memory and how the user perceives the conversation.”
BackgroundPrompted LLMs as Chatbot Modules for Long Open-domain Conversation
Lee, G., Hartmann, V., Park, J., Papailiopoulos, D., & Lee, K. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023 · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.277 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
“The Multi-Session Chat dataset (Xu et al., 2022) allows for measuring how well conversational agents maintain a long-term memory of facts about the user and bot.”
Volum, R., Rao, S., Xu, M., DesGarennes, G., Brockett, C., Van Durme, B., Deng, O., Malhotra, A., & Dolan, B. (2022) · Proceedings of the 3rd Wordplay: When Language Meets Games Workshop (Wordplay 2022) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.wordplay-1.3 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
“, (Lewis et al., 2020; Xu et al., 2021), may provide the needed factual grounding.”
BackgroundInfluentialA-Mem: Agentic Memory for LLM Agents
Xu, W., Liang, Z., Mei, K., Gao, H., Tan, J., & Zhang, Y. (2025) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 38 · doi:10.52202/085713-0593 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
“To evaluate the effectiveness of instruction-aware recommendation in long-term conversations, we utilize the LoCoMo dataset [22], which contains significantly longer dialogues compared to existing conversational datasets [36, 13].”
Personalized Dialogue Generation with Persona-Adaptive Attention
Huang, Q., Zhang, Y., Ko, T., Liu, X., Wu, B., Wang, W., & Tang, H. (2023) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v37i11.26518 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Keep Me Updated! Memory Management in Long-term Conversations
Bae, S., Kwak, D., Kang, S., Lee, M. Y., Kim, S., Jeong, Y., Kim, H., Lee, S.-W., Park, W., & Sung, N. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2022 · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-emnlp.276 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Zhang, Q., Naradowsky, J., & Miyao, Y. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.417 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Helping the Helper : Supporting Peer Counselors via AI-Empowered Practice and Feedback
Hsu, S.-L., Shah, R. S., Senthil, P., Ashktorab, Z., Dugan, C., Geyer, W., & Yang, D. (2025) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3710993 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
“Its subsequent iteration [145] continuously maintains a summary of conversation history for reference across chat sessions.”
Improving conversational recommender systems via multi-preference modelling and knowledge-enhanced
Zhang, C., Huang, X., An, J., & Zou, S. (2024) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2023.111361 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
State-of-the-Art in Open-Domain Conversational AI: A Survey
Adewumi, T., Liwicki, F., & Liwicki, M. (2022) · Information · doi:10.3390/info13060298 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Can Large Language Models Be Good Companions?
Xu, Z., Xu, H., Lu, Z., Zhao, Y., Zhu, R., Wang, Y., Dong, M., Chang, Y., Lv, Q., Dick, R. P., et al. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3659600 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
“The visual dialogue task was first introduced by Das et al. [28], involving two participants in an image-based question-answering task, where a person asks a question about an image and a chatbot gives a response.”
Controllable Mixed-Initiative Dialogue Generation through Prompting
Chen, M., Yu, X., Shi, W., Awasthi, U., & Zhou, Y. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-short.82 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Am I Me or You? State-of-the-Art Dialogue Models Cannot Maintain an Identity
Shuster, K., Urbanek, J., Szlam, A., & Weston, J. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL 2022 · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-naacl.182 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Self-citationMemoryBank: Enhancing Large Language Models with Long-Term Memory
Zhong, W., Guo, L., Gao, Q., Ye, H., & Wang, Y. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.10250 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
Survey and perspective on social emotions in robotics
Hieida, C., & Nagai, T. (2022) · Advanced Robotics · doi:10.1080/01691864.2021.2012512 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“Chatbot systems, which were previously believed to be impossible, are being developed to considerable performance levels [91].”
BackgroundXu, J., Ung, M., Komeili, M., Arora, K., Boureau, Y.-L., & Weston, J. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.758 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Self-citationFineD-Eval: Fine-grained Automatic Dialogue-Level Evaluation
Zhang, C., D’Haro, L. F., Zhang, Q., Friedrichs, T., & Li, H. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.220 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Ehtesham-Ul-Haque, M., D’Rozario, J., Adnin, R., Utshaw, F. T., Tasneem, F., Shefa, I. J., & Islam, A. B. M. A. A. (2023) · Cognitive Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2023.101168 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Large Language Models as Source Planner for Personalized Knowledge-grounded Dialogues
Wang, H., Hu, M., Deng, Y., Wang, R., Mi, F., Wang, W., Wang, Y., Kwan, W.-C., King, I., & Wong, K. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.641 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Automatic Evaluation and Moderation of Open-domain Dialogue SystemsPreprint
Zhang, C., Sedoc, J., D’Haro, L. F., Banchs, R. E., & Rudnicky, A. I. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2111.02110 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
“…baseline released to the participants (see section 3.1 based on a finetuned version of DialogGPT, b) BlenderBot vs 2.0 including its safety layer (Xu, Szlam, and Weston 2021; Komeili, Shuster, and Weston 2021), and c) GPT-3 (Brown et al. 2020) available using the OpenAI API 23 and obtaining the…”
MethodInfluentialHistory-Aware Hierarchical Transformer for Multi-session Open-domain Dialogue System
Zhang, T., Liu, Y., Li, B., Zeng, Z., Wang, P., You, Y., Miao, C., & Cui, L. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2022 · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-emnlp.247 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
A Safe Collaborative Chatbot for Smart Home Assistants
Chkroun, M., & Azaria, A. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21196641 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
So, C., Khvan, A., & Choi, W. (2023) · Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds · doi:10.1002/cav.2149 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“121,122 Several methods have been proposed by the authors of BlenderBot 2.0, including retrieval augmentation techniques, where a retrieval component finds and selects a part of the context to be included in the final decoding.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialJang, J., Boo, M., & Kim, H. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.838 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Robots-Dont-Cry: Understanding Falsely Anthropomorphic Utterances in Dialog Systems
Gros, D., Li, Y., & Zhou, Y. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.215 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Leveraging Large Language Models for Automated Dialogue Analysis
Finch, S. E., Paek, E. S., & Choi, J. D. (2023) · Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.sigdial-1.20 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Evaluating LLM-based Agents for Multi-turn Conversations: A Survey
Guan, S., Wang, J., 渡辺, 将., Zhu, B., Lou, J., & Xiong, H. (2026) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3793671 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Don’t Forget Your ABC’s: Evaluating the State-of-the-Art in Chat-Oriented Dialogue Systems
Finch, S. E., Finch, J. D., & Choi, J. D. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.839 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Rodríguez-Cantelar, M., Estecha-Garitagoitia, M., D’Haro, L. F., Matı́a, F., & de Córdoba, R. (2023) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app13169055 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Revolutionizing Customer Service : The Impact of Large Language Models on Chatbot Performance
Meduri, S. (2024) · International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science Engineering and Information Technology · doi:10.32628/cseit241051057 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Troussas, C., Krouska, A., Phivos Mylonas, B., Sgouropoulou, C., & Voyiatzis, I. (2025) · Computers · doi:10.3390/computers14030089 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“For instance, in [55], the authors have pointed out that generative AI models lack coherence over long periods without explicit memory mechanisms.”
Fujii, A., Jokinen, K., Okada, K., & Inaba, M. (2022) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2022.933001 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“In the recent research concerning chatbots, the system for interacting based on long-term memory which contains information about the user and internet searches (Komeili et al., 2021; Xu et al., 2021), and the system for identifying the user by face recognition and looking up the saved user profile to adapt to the use…”
BackgroundMulti-perspective empathy modeling for empathetic dialogue generation
Qiao, B., Zhang, Y., Gao, P., Li, X., Wang, S., & Han, D. (2025) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2025.113191 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Learning as Conversation: Dialogue Systems Reinforced for Information Acquisition
Cai, P., Wan, H., Liu, F., Yu, M., Yu, H. Q., & Joshi, S. (2022) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.352 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
The CRINGE Loss: Learning what language not to model
Adolphs, L., Gao, T., Xu, J., Shuster, K., Sukhbaatar, S., & Weston, J. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.493 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Self-citationUnderstanding Users' Privacy Perceptions Towards LLM's RAG-based Memory
Zhang, S., Ma, R., Ma, Y., Li, S., Xu, Y., Yi, X., & Li, H. (2025) · Proceedings of the 2025 Workshop on Human-Centered AI Privacy and Security · doi:10.1145/3733816.3760750 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“These include recursive summarization and refinement techniques to distill salient information and reduce redundancy [12, 32, 37, 38, 49], as well as selective retrieval-based systems that store memories in unstructured or layered repositories and fetch them based on conversational relevance [3,…”
Yan, S., Yang, X., Huang, Z., Nie, E., Ding, Z., Li, Z., Ma, X., Bi, J., Kersting, K., Pan, J. Z., et al. (2026) · Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2026.acl-long.583 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Jo, W., Hong, S., Choi, J.-W., Kwon, B., Sang, H., Im, D., Kim, S., Kim, S., Lee, T. D., & Yoo, H. (2025) · Digest of technical papers/Digest of technical papers - IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference · doi:10.1109/isscc49661.2025.10904658 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Users' Expectations and Practices with Agent Memory
Jones, B., Stemmler, K., Su, E., Kim, Y., & Kuzminykh, A. (2025) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3706599.3720158 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“Strategies for maintaining an agent’s memory include summarization (e.g., [29, 32]) and refinement (e.g., [37]) of conversational and interactional histories, maintaining vector databases and retrieving relevant conversations or information through semantic or linguistic matching (e.g., [13, 24,…”
Rakin, S., Shibly, M. A. R., Hossain, Z. M., Akbar, M. M., & Khan, Z. (2025) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-89063-5_42 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
CDConv: A Benchmark for Contradiction Detection in Chinese Conversations
Zheng, C., Zhou, J., Zheng, Y., Peng, L., Guo, Z., Wu, W., Niu, Z.-Y., Wu, H., & Huang, M. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.2 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Open Source System Integration Towards Natural Interaction with Robots
Fujii, A., & Jokinen, K. (2022) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1109/hri53351.2022.9889582 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“…concern chatbots that interact with the user on the basis of the bot’s long-term memory which contains information about the user and about their internet searches [22], [23], or use face recognition to identify the user and look up the saved user profile to adapt to the returning user [1].”
BackgroundNon-Real-Time Chatbot: Improving Anthropomorphism and Realizing Long-Term Human–Chatbot Interaction
Mitsuno, S., Ban, M., Arimoto, T., Sugiyama, H., Ishiguro, H., & Yoshikawa, Y. (2025) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2025.2508316 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“Our chatbot utilized summarizer, a technique adopted in several studies (e.g., Lee et al., 2023; Shuster et al., 2022; Xu et al., 2021), to ensure consistent and coherent responses over the long-term.”
Tao, D., Wang, C., Huang, F., Chen, J., Huang, Y., & Jiang, M. (2025) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2025.114011 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“SeeKeR Shuster, Komeili, Adolphs, Roller, Szlam and Weston (2022a) surpasses BlenderBot2 Xu et al. (2021) by executing three modular tasks using a single language model: generating search queries, extracting relevant knowledge from retrieved documents, and generating the final response.”
Ai, K., Tang, K., & Wang, C. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2025.3633888 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“Nevertheless, advanced memory pruning techniques, such as summarization-based approaches [43,66] or retrieval-based hierarchical methods [74], could further improve efficiency and long-term coherence, which we plan to explore in future work.”
LiveChat: A Large-Scale Personalized Dialogue Dataset Automatically Constructed from Live Streaming
Gao, J., Lian, Y., Zhou, Z., Fu, Y., & Wang, B. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.858 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Rethinking Response Evaluation from Interlocutor’s Eye for Open-Domain Dialogue Systems
Tsuta, Y., Yoshinaga, N., Sato, S., & Toyoda, M. (2023) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.ijcnlp-srw.8 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Kwon, D., Lee, S., Kim, K. H., Lee, S., Kim, T.-Y., & Davis, E. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-industry.68 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Leveraging Intent Entity Enhancement for Task-Oriented Dialogue
Chen, J., Li, S., Kan, B., Wang, F. L., & Hao, T. (2024) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn60899.2024.10649940 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Automatically Exposing Problems with Neural Dialog Models
Yu, D., & Sagae, K. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.37 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“However, even with carefully pre-processed training data from online sources, neural dialog models are prone to issues including generic utterances, repetition, contradiction, and lack of safety (Li et al., 2016a; Welleck et al., 2020; Li et al., 2020; Roller et al., 2021; Xu et al., 2021).”
BackgroundAdewumi, T., Adeyemi, M., Aremu, A., Peters, B., Buzaaba, H., Oyerinde, S., Rufai, A. M., Ajibade, B., Gwadabe, T., Traore, M. M. K., et al. (2023) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn54540.2023.10191208 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“In BlenderBot 2 [46], [47], the same BlendedSkillTalk (BST) [48] collection of datasets used for BlenderBot 1 [3] is used to train the model, in addition to 3 others.”
MethodComplex QA and language models hybrid architectures, SurveyPreprint
Daull, X., Bellot, P., Bruno, E., Martin, V., & Murisasco, É. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.09051 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Draw Me a Flower: Processing and Grounding Abstraction in Natural Language
Lachmy, R., Pyatkin, V., Manevich, A., & Tsarfaty, R. (2022) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00522 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“This result corroborates previous findings in studies which show that models benefit from textual history (Haber et al., 2019; Xu et al., 2022).”
ResultFukui, R., Yuguchi, A., Matsumoto, Y., & Okadome, Y. (2024) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/ro-man60168.2024.10731410 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Improving the closing sequences of interaction between human and robot through conversation analysis
Uchida, T., Kameo, N., & Ishiguro, H. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-81353-7 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Those Aren’t Your Memories, They’re Somebody Else’s: Seeding Misinformation in Chat Bot Memories
Atkins, C., Zhao, B. Z. H., Asghar, H. J., Wood, I., & Kâafar, M. A. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-33488-7_11 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Answerability: A custom metric for evaluating chatbot performance
Gupta, P., Rajasekar, A. A., Patel, A., Kulkarni, M., Sunell, A., Kim, K., Ganapathy, K., & Trivedi, A. (2022) · Workshop on Generation, Evaluation and Metrics (GEM) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.gem-1.27 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“, 2020), and percentage of perturn engaging responses (Xu et al., 2022) focus on how closely the bot-user conversation resembles a human conversation over multiple turns.”
BackgroundCompound AI System for Personalized Learning: Integrating LLM Agents with Knowledge Graphs
Antonov, E. (2024) · International Conference on Robotics, Intelligent Control and Artificial Intelligence (RICAI) · doi:10.1109/ricai64321.2024.10911764 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“However, they face challenges [10] such as maintaining long-term context [11], providing reliable source attribution [12], and ensuring interpretability, all of which can undermine trust within educational environments.”
MPCHAT: Towards Multimodal Persona-Grounded Conversation
Ahn, J., Song, Y., Yun, S., & Kim, G. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.189 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Mind the Gap Between Conversations for Improved Long-Term Dialogue Generation
Zhang, Q., Naradowsky, J., & Miyao, Y. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.720 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Chang, J., & Wu, C. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslpro.2025.3578773 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“…the persona of the system [4], [5], [6], [7]; categorizing the emotion, keyword, knowledge, and topic of the conversation [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18]; memorizing the historical context of the dialogue [19], [20]; and blending different communication skills [21].”
GPT-2-based Human-in-the-loop Theatre Play Script Generation
Rosa, R., Schmidtová, P., Dušek, O., Musil, T., Mareček, D., Islam, S. O. U., Novàkovâ, M., Vosecká, K., & Doležal, J. (2022) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.wnu-1.4 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“For dialogue generation, Xu et al. (2021)’s work is close to our baseline flat approach (Section 3) in that they generate long dialogues by using summarization.”
BackgroundOpen Domain Response Generation Guided by Retrieved Conversations
Shu, C., Zhang, Z., Chen, Y., Xiao, J. Z., Lau, J. H., Zhang, Q., & Lu, Z. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3225647 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“Xu et al. [46] found retrieval-augmented methods that have the ability to summarize and recall previous conversations helpful.”
BackgroundFeng, T., Qu, L., & Haffari, G. (2023) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00561 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“, 2021) and MSC (Xu et al., 2022) each, then employed four graduate computer science students and four well-trained crowd-workers to annotate direct causes of responses.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialDialogue act-based partner persona extraction for consistent personalized response generation
Lee, K., Lee, K., Kim, D., & Lee, K.-H. (2024) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124380 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
DialRet: Enhancing Dialogue Retention for Multi-session Conversations
Na, Y., Kim, D., & Chae, D. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-8186-0_7 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Overview of the Tenth Dialog System Technology Challenge: DSTC10
Yoshino, K., Chen, Y.-N., Crook, P., Kottur, S., Li, J., Hedayatnia, B., Moon, S., Fei, Z., Li, Z., Zhang, J., et al. (2023) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2023.3293030 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“The three chatbots include: a) the pretrained baseline released to the participants (a finetuned version of DialogGPT [70]). b) BlenderBot Vs 2.0 (including its safety layer) [76], [77], and c) GPT-3 [78] (the DaVinci version).”
BackgroundInfluentialA Prompt Chaining Framework for Long-Term Recall in LLM-Powered Intelligent Assistant
Seo, S., Yoo, S., & Jang, Y. (2025) · Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces · doi:10.1145/3708359.3712117 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Design Guidelines for Developing Systems for Dialogue System Competitions
Komatani, K., Takeda, R., Nakashima, K., & Nakano, M. (2022) · Lecture notes in electrical engineering · doi:10.1007/978-981-19-5538-9_11 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Wen, J., Zhou, H., Guan, J., Zhou, J., & Huang, M. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.612 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“The lack of large-scale long-turn di-a alogue data restricts dialogue models from deriving more advanced abilities to utilize long-range context for modeling multi-turn dialogues during pre-training (Xu et al., 2021, 2022b).”
BackgroundPark, C., Lee, J., Son, S., Park, K., Jang, J., & Lim, H. (2024) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app14114821 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Position Matters! Empirical Study of Order Effect in Knowledge-grounded Dialogue
Su, H., Kumar, S. H., Mazumder, S., Chen, W., Manuvinakurike, R., Okur, E., Sahay, S., Nachman, L., Chen, S.-T., & Lee, H.-Y. (2023) · DialDoc Workshop on Document-grounded Dialogue and Conversational Question Answering (DialDoc) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.dialdoc-1.4 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Towards a Progression-Aware Autonomous Dialogue Agent
Sanders, A., Strzalkowski, T., Si, M., Chang, A., Dey, D., Braasch, J., & Wang, D. (2022) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.87 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Common Law Annotations: Investigating the Stability of Dialog System Output Annotations
Lee, S., DeLucia, A., Nangia, N., Ganedi, P., Guan, R., Li, R., Ngaw, B., Singhal, A., Vaidya, S., Yuan, Z., et al. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.780 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Westhäußer, R., Minker, W., & Zepf, S. (2026) · Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces · doi:10.1145/3742413.3789222 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“By utilizing external knowledge sources, memory-augmented meth-ods address the limitation of a limited context window and enable the integration of past information into the current input prompt [22, 26, 33, 36, 39, 42, 47, 50].”
Yan, S., Yang, X., Huang, Z., Nie, E., Ding, Z., Li, Z., Ma, X., Bi, J., Kersting, K., Pan, J. Z., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.19828 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“We further evaluate on the Multi-Session Chat (MSC) dataset (Xu et al., 2021), which contains open-domain dialogues spanning multiple sessions.”
Generating, retrieving persona and generating responses for long-term open-domain dialogue
Cha, D., Lee, D., & Kim, J. (2025) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.2979 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“For example, the multi-session chat ( Xu, Szlam & Weston, 2022 ) is a long-term dialogue dataset consisting of dialogues with five sessions, each containing approximately 12 utterances.”
InfluentialSanyal, P., Rathore, K., & Arjunan, R. V. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-38913-w · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Persona-Identified Chatbot through Small-Scale Modeling and Data Transformation
Keum, B., Sun, J., Lee, W., Park, S., & Kim, H. (2024) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics13081409 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Additionally, to closely mimic real-world conversational scenarios, datasets consisting of multiple dialogue sessions have been proposed [9–11].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialRuPersonaChat: a dialog corpus for personalizing conversational agents
Apanasovich, K., Makhnytkina, O. V., Kabarov, V., & Dalevskaya, O. P. (2024) · Scientific and technical journal of information technologies mechanics and optics · doi:10.17586/2226-1494-2024-24-2-214-221 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“В наборах данных Multi-Session Chat [7] и DuLeMon [8] данная проблема решена путем обучения модели запоминать в ходе ведения диалога новые факты о персонах своего собеседника и себе самой.”
- Authors
- Xu, J., Szlam, A., & Weston, J.
- Affiliations
- Meta (United States) (US)
- ORCID
- Xu, Jing
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2021
- Pages
- 5180-5197
- ISSN
- 0736-587X (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2107.07567
- OpenAlex
- W3186804217
- Cited by
- 148
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 5
- FWCI
- 16.87
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
- Keywords
- open-domain dialogue, long-context models, retrieval-augmented generation, dialogue summarization, chatbot evaluation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
