PreprintCited by 31Ethics and Social Impacts of AIFace recognition and analysisAcademic integrity and plagiarism

Mitigating Dataset Harms Requires Stewardship: Lessons from 1000 Papers

Open access
Peng, Kenny, Mathur, Arunesh, Narayanan, Arvind·2021·arXiv

Abstract

Machine learning datasets have elicited concerns about privacy, bias, and unethical applications, leading to the retraction of prominent datasets such as DukeMTMC, MS-Celeb-1M, and Tiny Images. In response, the machine learning community has called for higher ethical standards in dataset creation. To help inform these efforts, we studied three influential but ethically problematic face and person recognition datasets -- Labeled Faces in the Wild (LFW), MS-Celeb-1M, and DukeMTM -- by analyzing nearly 1000 papers that cite them. We found that the creation of derivative datasets and models, broader technological and social change, the lack of clarity of licenses, and dataset management practices can introduce a wide range of ethical concerns. We conclude by suggesting a distributed approach to harm mitigation that considers the entire life cycle of a dataset.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2108.02922

Cites

70 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There has been an increased focus on analyzing other dimensions of data quality and stewardship, with several initiatives aiming to document existing and newly developed resources.

    “There has also been an increased focus on analyzing other dimensions of data quality and stewardship [102, 107, 121, 123], with several noteworthy initiatives aiming to document both existing [9, 20, 30, 43], and newly developed [16, 60, 136] resources.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. [15][15] Tamara Berg, Alexander Berg, Jaety Edwards, and David Forsyth. Who's In the Picture. In L. Saul, Y. Weiss, and L. Bottou, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume 17. MIT Press, 2005. URL https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2004/file/03fa2f7502f5f6b9169e67d17cbf51bbPaper.pdf . -
  2. [18][18] Su Lin Blodgett and Brendan T. O'Connor. Racial Disparity in Natural Language Processing: A Case Study of Social Media African-American English. ArXiv , abs/1707.00061, 2017. - · arXiv
  3. [34][34] Allen Institute for AI. Semantic Scholar API. https://api.semanticscholar.org . -
  4. [38][38] R. Gross, I. Matthews, J. Cohn, T. Kanade, and S. Baker. Multi-PIE. 2008 8th IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face & Gesture Recognition , pages 1-8, 2008. -
  5. [47][47] Sarah Holland, A. Hosny, Sarah Newman, Joshua Joseph, and Kasia Chmielinski. The Dataset Nutrition Label: A Framework To Drive Higher Data Quality Standards. ArXiv , abs/1805.03677, 2018. - · arXiv
  6. [58][58] Yutian Lin, L. Zheng, Zhedong Zheng, Yu Wu, and Y. Yang. Improving Person Re-identification by Attribute and Identity Learning. ArXiv , abs/1703.07220, 2019. - · arXiv
  7. [92][92] Zhong yuan Wang, Guangcheng Wang, Baojin Huang, Zhangyang Xiong, Q. Hong, Hao Wu, Peng Yi, Kui Jiang, Nanxi Wang, Yingjiao Pei, Heling Chen, Yu Miao, Z. Huang, and Jinbi Liang. Masked Face Recognition Dataset and Application. ArXiv , abs/2003.09093, 2020. - · arXiv
  8. [96][96] Yuxiang Zhou and S. Zafeiriou. Deformable Models of Ears in-the-Wild for Alignment and Recognition. 2017 12th IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face & Gesture Recognition (FG 2017) , pages 626-633, 2017.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peng, K., Mathur, A., & Narayanan, A.
Affiliations
Princeton University (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2021
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3190472000
Cited by
31
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Science Foundation (1704444, 1763642)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
Keywords
harm mitigation, face recognition datasets, Labeled Faces in the Wild, privacy, bias

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review