The DOI matches its DataCite record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Language Models as Zero-Shot Planners: Extracting Actionable Knowledge for Embodied Agents
Open accessAbstract
Can world knowledge learned by large language models (LLMs) be used to act in interactive environments? In this paper, we investigate the possibility of grounding high-level tasks, expressed in natural language (e.g. "make breakfast"), to a chosen set of actionable steps (e.g. "open fridge"). While prior work focused on learning from explicit step-by-step examples of how to act, we surprisingly find that if pre-trained LMs are large enough and prompted appropriately, they can effectively decompose high-level tasks into mid-level plans without any further training. However, the plans produced naively by LLMs often cannot map precisely to admissible actions. We propose a procedure that conditions on existing demonstrations and semantically translates the plans to admissible actions. Our evaluation in the recent VirtualHome environment shows that the resulting method substantially improves executability over the LLM baseline. The conducted human evaluation reveals a trade-off between executability and correctness but shows a promising sign towards extracting actionable knowledge from language models. Website at https://huangwl18.github.io/language-planner
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Several works use LLMs as interactive policies, demonstrating their strong capabilities but also highlighting challenges in grounding them with observations and actions (Huang et al., 2022;Yao et al., 2023;Ahn et al., 2022;Huang et al., 2023;Zeng et al., 2022).”
From PARTNR: A Benchmark for Planning and Reasoning in Embodied Multi-agent Tasks (2024) · cites this paper as Huang et al., 2022
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Agents equipped with LLM-based planners have started to show the ability to learn a new task with a few training examples.”
From LLM-Planner: Few-Shot Grounded Planning for Embodied Agents with Large Language Models (2023) · cites this paper as [13]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“However, these pre-trained models, especially the VLMs, are not explicitly designed for physical interactions and, therefore, often lack the physical common sense understanding and result in suboptimal plans and execution.”
From Cosmos-Reason1: From Physical Common Sense To Embodied Reasoning (2025) · cites this paper as Huang et al., 2022
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“For instance, language models have been used via prompting to translate natural language instructions into actions executable by robots (Ahn et al., 2022; Huang et al., 2022), interact with users (Coenen et al., 2021; Wu et al., 2021; 2022a; Lee et al., 2022b), and facilitate multi-modal reasoning (Zeng et al., 2022; Alayrac et al., 2022).”
From Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models (2022) · cites this paper as Huang et al., 2022
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Once learned, language can unlock planning, reasoning (e.g., Huang et al., 2022;Brohan et al., 2023b;Driess et al., 2023;Kim et al., 2023), and communication (Zeng et al., 2022) about grounded situations and tasks.”
From Scaling Instructable Agents Across Many Simulated Worlds (2024) · cites this paper as Huang et al., 2022
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Large language models (LLMs) have the ability to understand tasks described in natural language and generate plans to solve them [20, 27, 49, 60].”
From AgentDojo: A Dynamic Environment to Evaluate Prompt Injection Attacks and Defenses for LLM Agents (2024) · cites this paper as [20]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In the specific arena of autonomous task completion, LLMs struggle with making task breakdowns that are both correct and executable [10].”
From Autonomous Task Completion Based on Goal-directed Answer Set Programming (2025) · cites this paper as [10]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In these works, LLMs are often used to help an agent plan its actions [4], [13], [14], despite evidence that they may not be capable of reliably planning [15].”
From Episodic Memory in AI Agents Poses Risks that Should be Studied and Mitigated (2025) · cites this paper as [13]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Research works printed but not linked: 51
- [1][1] Peter Anderson, Qi Wu, Damien Teney, Jake Bruce, Mark Johnson, Niko Sünderhauf, Ian Reid, Stephen Gould, and Anton Van Den Hengel. Vision-and-language navigation: Interpreting visually-grounded navigation instructions in real environments. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 3674-3683, 2018. -
- [2][2] Yoav Artzi and Luke Zettlemoyer. Weakly supervised learning of semantic parsers for mapping instructions to actions. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics , 1:49-62, 2013. -
- [6][6] Daniel Cer, Mona Diab, Eneko Agirre, Inigo Lopez-Gazpio, and Lucia Specia. Semeval-2017 task 1: Semantic textual similarity-multilingual and cross-lingual focused evaluation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.00055 , 2017. - · arXiv
- [7][7] Mark Chen, Jerry Tworek, Heewoo Jun, Qiming Yuan, Henrique Ponde, Jared Kaplan, Harri Edwards, Yura Burda, Nicholas Joseph, Greg Brockman, et al. Evaluating large language models trained on code. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.03374 , 2021. - · arXiv
- [8][8] Karl Cobbe, Vineet Kosaraju, Mohammad Bavarian, Jacob Hilton, Reiichiro Nakano, Christopher Hesse, and John Schulman. Training verifiers to solve math word problems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.14168 , 2021. - · arXiv
- [9][9] Joe Davison, Joshua Feldman, and Alexander M Rush. Commonsense knowledge mining from pretrained models. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP) , pages 1173-1178, 2019. -
- [11][11] Daniel Fried, Ronghang Hu, Volkan Cirik, Anna Rohrbach, Jacob Andreas, Louis-Philippe Morency, Taylor Berg-Kirkpatrick, Kate Saenko, Dan Klein, and Trevor Darrell. Speakerfollower models for vision-and-language navigation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.02724 , 2018. - · arXiv
- [12][12] Justin Fu, Anoop Korattikara, Sergey Levine, and Sergio Guadarrama. From language to goals: Inverse reinforcement learning for vision-based instruction following. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.07742 , 2019. - · arXiv
- [13][13] Tianyu Gao, Adam Fisch, and Danqi Chen. Making pre-trained language models better few-shot learners. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.15723 , 2020. - · arXiv
- [14][14] Brent Harrison and Mark O Riedl. Learning from stories: using crowdsourced narratives to train virtual agents. In Twelfth Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment Conference , 2016. -
- [15][15] Dan Hendrycks, Steven Basart, Saurav Kadavath, Mantas Mazeika, Akul Arora, Ethan Guo, Collin Burns, Samir Puranik, Horace He, Dawn Song, et al. Measuring coding challenge competence with apps. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.09938 , 2021. - · arXiv
- [16][16] Felix Hill, Sona Mokra, Nathaniel Wong, and Tim Harley. Human instruction-following with deep reinforcement learning via transfer-learning from text. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.09382 , 2020. - · arXiv
- [17][17] Sepp Hochreiter and Jürgen Schmidhuber. Long short-term memory. Neural computation , 9(8): 1735-1780, 1997. -
- [18][18] Ari Holtzman, Jan Buys, Li Du, Maxwell Forbes, and Yejin Choi. The curious case of neural text degeneration. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.09751 , 2019. - · arXiv
- [19][19] Gabriel Ilharco, Rowan Zellers, Ali Farhadi, and Hannaneh Hajishirzi. Probing text models for common ground with visual representations. arXiv e-prints , pages arXiv-2005, 2020. -
- [20][20] Peter A Jansen. Visually-grounded planning without vision: Language models infer detailed plans from high-level instructions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.14259 , 2020. - · arXiv
- [21][21] Zhengbao Jiang, Frank F Xu, Jun Araki, and Graham Neubig. How can we know what language models know? Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics , 8:423-438, 2020. -
- [22][22] Eric Kolve, Roozbeh Mottaghi, Winson Han, Eli VanderBilt, Luca Weihs, Alvaro Herrasti, Daniel Gordon, Yuke Zhu, Abhinav Gupta, and Ali Farhadi. Ai2-thor: An interactive 3d environment for visual ai. arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.05474 , 2017. - · arXiv
- [23][23] Belinda Z Li, Maxwell Nye, and Jacob Andreas. Implicit representations of meaning in neural language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.00737 , 2021. - · arXiv
- [24][24] Shuang Li, Xavier Puig, Yilun Du, Clinton Wang, Ekin Akyurek, Antonio Torralba, Jacob Andreas, and Igor Mordatch. Pre-trained language models for interactive decision-making. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.01771 , 2022. - · arXiv
- [25][25] Yuan-Hong Liao, Xavier Puig, Marko Boben, Antonio Torralba, and Sanja Fidler. Synthesizing environment-aware activities via activity sketches. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 6291-6299, 2019. -
- [26][26] Jiachang Liu, Dinghan Shen, Yizhe Zhang, Bill Dolan, Lawrence Carin, and Weizhu Chen. What makes good in-context examples for gpt3 ? arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.06804 , 2021. - · arXiv
- [27][27] Yinhan Liu, Myle Ott, Naman Goyal, Jingfei Du, Mandar Joshi, Danqi Chen, Omer Levy, Mike Lewis, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Veselin Stoyanov. Roberta: A robustly optimized bert pretraining approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.11692 , 2019. - · arXiv
- [28][28] Kevin Lu, Aditya Grover, Pieter Abbeel, and Igor Mordatch. Pretrained transformers as universal computation engines. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.05247 , 2021. - · arXiv
- [29][29] Corey Lynch and Pierre Sermanet. Grounding language in play. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.07648 , 2020. - · arXiv
- [30][30] Corey Lynch and Pierre Sermanet. Language conditioned imitation learning over unstructured data. Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems. doi , 10, 2021. -
- [31][31] Arjun Majumdar, Ayush Shrivastava, Stefan Lee, Peter Anderson, Devi Parikh, and Dhruv Batra. Improving vision-and-language navigation with image-text pairs from the web. In European Conference on Computer Vision , pages 259-274. Springer, 2020. -
- [32][32] Suvir Mirchandani, Siddharth Karamcheti, and Dorsa Sadigh. Ella: Exploration through learned language abstraction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.05825 , 2021. - · arXiv
- [33][33] Dipendra Misra, Kejia Tao, Percy Liang, and Ashutosh Saxena. Environment-driven lexicon induction for high-level instructions. In Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers) , pages 992-1002, 2015. -
- [34][34] Dipendra K Misra, Jaeyong Sung, Kevin Lee, and Ashutosh Saxena. Tell me dave: Contextsensitive grounding of natural language to manipulation instructions. The International Journal of Robotics Research , 35(1-3):281-300, 2016. -
- [35][35] Jeffrey Pennington, Richard Socher, and Christopher D Manning. Glove: Global vectors for word representation. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (EMNLP) , pages 1532-1543, 2014. -
- [36][36] Fabio Petroni, Tim Rocktäschel, Patrick Lewis, Anton Bakhtin, Yuxiang Wu, Alexander H Miller, and Sebastian Riedel. Language models as knowledge bases? arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.01066 , 2019. - · arXiv
- [37][37] Gabriel Poesia, Oleksandr Polozov, Vu Le, Ashish Tiwari, Gustavo Soares, Christopher Meek, and Sumit Gulwani. Synchromesh: Reliable code generation from pre-trained language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.11227 , 2022. - · arXiv
- [38][38] Xavier Puig, Kevin Ra, Marko Boben, Jiaman Li, Tingwu Wang, Sanja Fidler, and Antonio Torralba. Virtualhome: Simulating household activities via programs. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 8494-8502, 2018. -
- [39][39] Alec Radford, Jeffrey Wu, Rewon Child, David Luan, Dario Amodei, Ilya Sutskever, et al. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI blog , 1(8):9, 2019. -
- [40][40] Colin Raffel, Noam Shazeer, Adam Roberts, Katherine Lee, Sharan Narang, Michael Matena, Yanqi Zhou, Wei Li, and Peter J Liu. Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.10683 , 2019. - · arXiv
- [41][41] Nils Reimers and Iryna Gurevych. Sentence-bert: Sentence embeddings using siamese bertnetworks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.10084 , 2019. - · arXiv
- [42][42] Adam Roberts, Colin Raffel, and Noam Shazeer. How much knowledge can you pack into the parameters of a language model? arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.08910 , 2020. - · arXiv
- [43][43] Ohad Rubin, Jonathan Herzig, and Jonathan Berant. Learning to retrieve prompts for in-context learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.08633 , 2021. - · arXiv
- [44][44] Manolis Savva, Abhishek Kadian, Oleksandr Maksymets, Yili Zhao, Erik Wijmans, Bhavana Jain, Julian Straub, Jia Liu, Vladlen Koltun, Jitendra Malik, et al. Habitat: A platform for embodied ai research. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages 9339-9347, 2019. -
- [45][45] Pratyusha Sharma, Antonio Torralba, and Jacob Andreas. Skill induction and planning with latent language. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.01517 , 2021. - · arXiv
- [46][46] Jianhao Shen, Yichun Yin, Lin Li, Lifeng Shang, Xin Jiang, Ming Zhang, and Qun Liu. Generate &rank: A multi-task framework for math word problems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.03034 , 2021. - · arXiv
- [47][47] Mohit Shridhar, Jesse Thomason, Daniel Gordon, Yonatan Bisk, Winson Han, Roozbeh Mottaghi, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Dieter Fox. Alfred: A benchmark for interpreting grounded instructions for everyday tasks. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages 10740-10749, 2020. -
- [48][48] Mohit Shridhar, Xingdi Yuan, Marc-Alexandre Côté, Yonatan Bisk, Adam Trischler, and Matthew Hausknecht. Alfworld: Aligning text and embodied environments for interactive learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.03768 , 2020. - · arXiv
- [49][49] Alessandro Suglia, Qiaozi Gao, Jesse Thomason, Govind Thattai, and Gaurav Sukhatme. Embodied bert: A transformer model for embodied, language-guided visual task completion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.04927 , 2021. - · arXiv
- [50][50] Alon Talmor, Yanai Elazar, Yoav Goldberg, and Jonathan Berant. olmpics-on what language model pre-training captures. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics , 8: 743-758, 2020. -
- [51][51] Moritz Tenorth, Daniel Nyga, and Michael Beetz. Understanding and executing instructions for everyday manipulation tasks from the world wide web. In 2010 ieee international conference on robotics and automation , pages 1486-1491. IEEE, 2010. -
- [52][52] Maria Tsimpoukelli, Jacob Menick, Serkan Cabi, SM Eslami, Oriol Vinyals, and Felix Hill. Multimodal few-shot learning with frozen language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.13884 , 2021. - · arXiv
- [53][53] Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. Attention is all you need. In Advances in neural information processing systems , pages 5998-6008, 2017. -
- [54][54] Xin Wang, Qiuyuan Huang, Asli Celikyilmaz, Jianfeng Gao, Dinghan Shen, Yuan-Fang Wang, William Yang Wang, and Lei Zhang. Reinforced cross-modal matching and self-supervised imitation learning for vision-language navigation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 6629-6638, 2019. -
- [55][55] Thomas Wolf, Lysandre Debut, Victor Sanh, Julien Chaumond, Clement Delangue, Anthony Moi, Pierric Cistac, Tim Rault, Rémi Louf, Morgan Funtowicz, et al. Huggingface's transformers: State-of-the-art natural language processing. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.03771 , 2019. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–340 of 340
VIPHY: Probing “Visible” Physical Commonsense Knowledge
Singh, S., Qasemi, E., & Chen, M. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.473 · Cited by 5
Wang, X., Li, L., & Zeng, D. D. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.309 · Cited by 2
Grounding Language for Robotic Manipulation via Skill Library
Zhao, Y., Zhou, Z., & Xiong, R. (2023) · International Conference on Machine Learning, Cloud Computing and Intelligent Mining (MLCCIM) · doi:10.1109/mlccim60412.2023.00062 · Cited by 1
CLFR-M: Continual Learning Framework for Robots via Human Feedback and Dynamic Memory
Wang, L., Fei, Y., Tang, H., & Yan, R. (2024) · IEEE Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1109/cis-ram61939.2024.10672832 · Cited by 1
Utility of Local Quantized Large Language Models in Semantic Navigation
Elksnis, A., Xue, Z., Chen, F., & Wang, N. (2024) · International Conference on Automation and Computing (ICAC) · doi:10.1109/icac61394.2024.10718777 · Cited by 1
Visually Impaired Assistance with Large Models
Xiang, R., Zhao, Y. H., Zhang, Y., Li, J., Liao, M., & Li, Y. (2024) · IEEE Smart World Congress (SWC) · doi:10.1109/swc62898.2024.00253 · Cited by 1
Two-phase Framework Clinical Question-Answering – Autocorrection for Guideline-concordancePreprint
Tariq, A., Yu, N. Y., Patel, B. N., & Banerjee, I. (2024) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2024.11.04.24316718 · Cited by 1
WebAgent-R1: Training Web Agents via End-to-End Multi-Turn Reinforcement Learning
Wei, Z., Yao, W., Liu, Y., Zhang, W., Lu, Q., Qiu, L., Yu, C., Xu, P., Zhang, C., Yin, B., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.16421
“…2024; Abuelsaad et al., 2024; Lutz et al., 2024; Pa-tel et al., 2024; Putta et al., 2024), general computer use (Li et al., 2020; Deng et al., 2023; Yang et al., 2024), and embodied environments (Puig et al., 2018; Shridhar et al., 2020; Toyama et al., 2021; Fan et al., 2022; Huang et al., 2022).”
Autonomous Task Completion Based on Goal-directed Answer Set Programming
Tudor, A. R. (2025) · Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science · doi:10.4204/eptcs.416.39
IW-Bench: Evaluating Large Multimodal Models for Converting Image-to-Web
Guo, H., Zhang, W., Chen, J., Gu, Y., Yang, J., Du, J., Cao, S., Hui, B., Liu, T., Ma, J., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.18980
From Text to Space: Mapping Abstract Spatial Models in LLMs during a Grid-World Navigation Task
Martorell, N. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.16690
Recursive Self-Evolving Agents via Held-Out Selection
Nguyen, M., Nguyen, Q., & Vuong, P. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.28374
Self-Supervised Skill Learning for Semi-Supervised Long-Horizon Instruction Following
Zhuang, B., Zhang, C., & Hu, Z. (2023) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics12071587
Using Planning to Improve Semantic Parsing of Instructional Texts
Cohen, V., & Mooney, R. J. (2023) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.nlrse-1.5
VAFOR: Proactive Voice Assistant for Object Retrieval in the Physical World
Satyev, B., & Ahn, H. (2023) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/ro-man57019.2023.10309466
Remember what you did so you know what to do next
Ciosici, M. R., Hedges, A., Kankanampati, Y., Martin, J. D., Freedman, M., & Weischedel, R. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.104
PlanAgent: Embodied Visual-Language Model for Grounded Task planning with Environment MapPreprint
Yue, Y., Yao, F., Liu, Y., Liu, N., Jin, L., Zhang, Z., Zhang, D., Sun, X., & Fu, K. (2024) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-4513731/v1
Lan, X., Liu, M., Luan, Z., Yan, H., & Chen, B. (2024) · Chinese Control Conference (CCC) · doi:10.23919/ccc63176.2024.10661782 · Cited by 1
Task Allocation for Heterogeneous Robots in Office Environments Using Large Language Models
Wu, H., Zhao, H., Ma, L., Li, Y., Chen, C., & Yuan, X. (2024) · International Conference on Intelligent Informatics and Biomedical Sciences (ICIIBMS) · doi:10.1109/iciibms62405.2024.10792681
LLaKey: Follow My Basic Action Instructions to Your Next Key State
Zhao, Z., He, Y., Yu, F. R., Li, P., Zhuo, F., & Sun, X. (2024) · IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros58592.2024.10802579
Cao, B., Wang, Y., Zhang, Y., & Ouyang, B. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Unmanned Systems (ICUS) · doi:10.1109/icus61736.2024.10839839
What AIs are not learning (and why)
Stefik, M. (2025) · AI Magazine · doi:10.1002/aaai.12213 · Cited by 1
Task Reasoning of Service Robots with Fused Multi-modal Information and Ontology Knowledge
Liu, B., Liu, G., Tian, G., Jiang, J., & Wang, S. (2025) · Lecture notes in electrical engineering · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-2468-3_30
MVP-MCTS: Language Modelling a Flexible Multi-Agent Planning Framework
Li, Z., & Ji, J. (2024) · International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Intelligent Manufacturing (AIIM) · doi:10.1109/aiim64537.2024.10934217
Vir, R., Shankar, S., Chase, H., Hinthorn, W., & Parameswaran, A. (2025) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.naacl-long.213 · Cited by 1
The Procedural Planning Abilities of Cloud-Based LLMS in Embodied Environments: A Meta-Analysis
Zhao, L., Gao, Y., Xu, Z., & You, J. (2025) · International Seminar on Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Information Technology (AINIT) · doi:10.1109/ainit65432.2025.11035707
A Proposal for Cooking Motion Generation Based on Maximizing the Margin of Task Achievement
Maruyama, K., Yamada, K., Suzuki, T., Akizuki, S., & Hashimoto, M. (2025) · International Journal of Automation Technology · doi:10.20965/ijat.2025.p0599
LLM-Assisted Plan Execution for Robots in Dynamic Environments
Peña‐Narvaez, J. D., Manzanares, J. C., Moreno, F. M., Pérez-Rodríguez, R., & Martín, F. (2026) · Robotics · doi:10.3390/robotics15040080
Enhancing Flight Deck Decision Support with Distributed GenAI: A Multi-Agent Approach
Prado, J. P. D. A., Zammit-Mangion, D., Zammit, B., Gauci, J., Muscat, A., Mizzi, S., & Manicolo, A. (2025) · IEEE Aerospace Conference (AERO) · doi:10.1109/aero63441.2025.11068478
Li, Z., Lu, F., Fu, T., & Tian, G. (2025) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2025.3595029
Optimizing Small-Scale Language Models for Robotic Task Planning: Insights into Prompt Design
Wu, F., Wang, Z., Li, Y., & Wu, Q. (2025) · International Conference on Computing and Artificial Intelligence (ICCAI) · doi:10.1109/iccai66501.2025.00066
Getting LLM to think and act like a human being: logical path reasoning and replanning
Zhang, L., Li, Q., Wang, Y., & Zhao, J. (2025) · International Conference on Computing and Artificial Intelligence (ICCAI) · doi:10.1109/iccai66501.2025.00054
Clear Yet Insufficient: Why Users Still Return to Source Notifications After Task Extraction
Chen, U.-D., Huang, R.-J., Wu, Y.-S., Wang, Y.-C., & Chang, Y.-J. (2026) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3772363.3798322
Automatic Knowledge Gap Detection and Plan Validation Using Counterfactual Justifications
Tudor, A. R., Arias, J., & Gupta, G. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-92-0184-6_13
Context-Driven Task and Motion Planning with Language Models
Lee, J. (2026) · The Journal of Korea Robotics Society · doi:10.7746/jkros.2026.21.3.325
PARTNR: A Benchmark for Planning and Reasoning in Embodied Multi-agent Tasks
Chang, M., Chhablani, G., Clegg, A., Cote, M. D., Desai, R., Hlavac, M., Karashchuk, V., Krantz, J., Mottaghi, R., Parashar, P., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.00081
InferCept: Efficient Intercept Support for Augmented Large Language Model Inference
Abhyankar, R., He, Z., Srivatsa, V., Zhang, H., & Zhang, Y. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.01869
“An LLM can be augmented to interact with virtual environments and accomplish complex tasks by performing gradual steps (Gu et al., 2022; Huang et al., 2022; Hu et al., 2023).”
BackgroundBaba in Wonderland: Online Self-Supervised Dynamics Discovery for Executable World Models
Seo, S., Han, D., Noh, S., & Kang, H. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.16725
DORA Explorer: Improving the Exploration Ability of LLMs Without Training
Gurjar, P., Ishmam, M. F., & Marino, K. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.17244
“While this translation allows for LLMs to work zero-shot (Huang et al., 2022), the text-based nature of this action space means that to properly explore, LLM agents must sample diverse sequences of tokens which comprise the action.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Huang, W., Abbeel, P., Pathak, D., & Mordatch, I.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2022
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2201.07207
- OpenAlex
- W4221152848
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 146 · 2023: 83 · 2022: 7
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (2024594)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Keywords
- large language models, task decomposition, embodied agents, semantic translation, human evaluation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
