In conversation with Artificial Intelligence: aligning language models with human values
Open accessAbstract
Large-scale language technologies are increasingly used in various forms of communication with humans across different contexts. One particular use case for these technologies is conversational agents, which output natural language text in response to prompts and queries. This mode of engagement raises a number of social and ethical questions. For example, what does it mean to align conversational agents with human norms or values? Which norms or values should they be aligned with? And how can this be accomplished? In this paper, we propose a number of steps that help answer these questions. We start by developing a philosophical analysis of the building blocks of linguistic communication between conversational agents and human interlocutors. We then use this analysis to identify and formulate ideal norms of conversation that can govern successful linguistic communication between humans and conversational agents. Furthermore, we explore how these norms can be used to align conversational agents with human values across a range of different discursive domains. We conclude by discussing the practical implications of our proposal for the design of conversational agents that are aligned with these norms and values.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
LLMs learn to replicate biases and stereotypes present in their training data because their objective is to predict the next element in a text based on a large corpus of internet text data.
“This can be explained since the objective of many LLMs, including GPT-3, is to predict the next element in a text, based on a large corpus of text data from the internet, (15) thus LLMs learn to replicate biases and stereotypes present in that data (16).”
From ChatGPT and the rise of large language models: the new AI-driven infodemic threat in public health (2023) · cites this paper as [16]
Cites
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 48,293 · cited 1× · see citing works
“At the same time, what modality of conversation is deemed to be ‘civil’ tends to vary widely according to cultural and historical context, and to be heavily indexed toward existing social conventions Dı́az et al. (2022). Given this variation across time and place, the social standards that define civil speech may or m…”
BackgroundLanguage Models are Few-Shot Learners
Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.14165 · Cited by 23,372 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Large-scale language technologies are increasingly used to enable various forms of linguistic communication in contexts ranging from biomedical research to education to machine translation [17, 19, 73].”
BackgroundLearning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision
Radford, A., Kim, J. W., Hallacy, C., Ramesh, A., Goh, G., Agarwal, S., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Mishkin, P., Clark, J., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.00020 · Cited by 15,293 · cited 1× · see citing works
“2For GPT-3, see [19]; for BERT, see [28]; for Turing-NLG-A-17, see [85]; for CLIP, see [81]; for Gopher, see [82].”
BackgroundReassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor‐Network‐Theory
Durepos, G. (2008) · Equal Opportunities International · doi:10.1108/eoi.2008.27.3.307.2 · Cited by 10,644 · cited 2× · see citing works
“6See, for example, Mehrabi et al. (2021), Mitchell et al.”
BackgroundOn the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big? 🦜
Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445922 · Cited by 6,988 · see citing works
A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning
Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., & Galstyan, A. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3457607 · Cited by 5,812 · see citing works
Potts, C. (2007) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444807294285 · Cited by 4,561
The theory of communicative action
Motta, F. C. P. (1991) · doi:10.1590/s0034-75901991000400012 · Cited by 4,172 · cited 5×
“35See, for example, Habermas (2016) and Held (2006). 36For a stronger interpretation of these deliberative norms we can turn to Habermas’s theory of deliberative democracy and in his conception of ideal speech (Habermas, 1984; 1987). Habermas focuses on the possibility of a critical discussion that is inclusive and fr…”
BackgroundInfluentialAvramides, A. (1992) · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0149.1992.tb00651.x · Cited by 3,704 · cited 11×
“We suggest that Gricean maxims can help map out the path ahead.”
BackgroundInfluentialA classification of illocutionary acts
Searle, J. R. (1976) · Language in Society · doi:10.1017/s0047404500006837 · Cited by 3,118 · see citing works
On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models
Bommasani, R., Hudson, D. A., Adeli, E., Altman, R., Arora, S., von Arx, S., Bernstein, M. S., Bohg, J., Bosselut, A., Brunskill, E., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.07258 · Cited by 2,676 · see citing works
PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways
Chowdhery, A., Narang, S., Devlin, J., Bosma, M., Mishra, G., Roberts, A., Barham, P., Chung, H. W., Sutton, C., Gehrmann, S., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2204.02311 · Cited by 2,590 · see citing works
The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms.
Sternberg, R., & Lubart, T. (1998) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511807916.003 · Cited by 2,352 · see citing works
IX.—Essentially Contested Concepts
Gallie, W. B. (1956) · Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society · doi:10.1093/aristotelian/56.1.167 · Cited by 2,280 · see citing works
Eberhart, M. (2016) · doi:10.5040/9781501315886.0013 · Cited by 1,469
Syntax: Structure, Meaning, and Function
Robinson, S. D. G., van Valin, R. V., & LaPolla, R. J. (1999) · doi:10.2307/417092 · Cited by 1,427 · cited 2×
“15For a detailed discussion about Syntax, see Van Valin and LaPolla [99].”
BackgroundA Survey on Automatic Detection of Hate Speech in Text
Fortuna, P., & Nunes, S. (2019) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3232676 · Cited by 1,241 · cited 2× · see citing works
“38For a recent survey of attempts to reduce ‘toxic speech’, see Fortuna and Nunes [34]. consideration.”
BackgroundFour Decades of Scientific Explanation
Salmon, W. C. (2006) · University of Pittsburgh Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctt5vkdm7 · Cited by 1,224 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Scientists pursue different goals in advancing scientific knowledge: they use science to explain or understand things about the world [87, 97], such as the formation of clouds; to predict phenomena [88], such as the structure of proteins; or to control the world around us [68] via, for example, the development of medi…”
BackgroundEssentially Contested Concepts
Gallie, W. B. (2019) · The Importance of Language · doi:10.7591/9781501741319-010 · Cited by 1,208 · cited 1×
“20For excellent introductions to the topic of pragmatics, see Grice (1968, 1989), Recanati (1989), Horn & Ward (2008), Stalnaker (2014), Thomas (1995), Goodman & Lassiter (2015), and Bergen et al.”
BackgroundMatisoff, J. A. (1996) · Language · doi:10.2307/416282 · Cited by 974 · cited 2× · see citing works
“28For critical discussion of Gricean maxims, questions about their universality, and alternative proposals, see Frederking [35], Keenan [56], Sperber and Wilson [92], and Wierzbicka [106].”
Horn, L. R., & Ward, G. L. (2005) · doi:10.1002/9780470756959 · Cited by 949
Computational Interpretations of the Gricean Maxims in the Generation of Referring Expressions
Dale, R., & Reiter, E. (1995) · Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1902_3 · Cited by 931 · cited 2× · see citing works
“See, for example, Dale and Reiter [27] and Asher et al. [7].”
Artificial Intelligence, Values, and Alignment
Gabriel, I. (2020) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-020-09539-2 · Cited by 896 · cited 2× · see citing works
“4For an in-depth examination of value alignment, see Gabriel [36].”
BackgroundSelf-citationInductive Risk and Values in Science
Douglas, H. (2000) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/392855 · Cited by 885 · cited 1× · see citing works
“These decisions are informed, in turn, by how seriously scientists account for the risk of making a mistake in accepting or rejecting a hypothesis, understood against a backdrop of human interests and human needs [30].”
BackgroundShemanski, S. (1939) · Black Pride and Black Prejudice · doi:10.1177/030216373900700301 · Cited by 859 · cited 1×
“23 This common ground is the body of information that is presupposed or shared by the parties in the discourse, about the discourse itself, and about the situation of the participants in that discourse - and it sets the boundaries of the situation relevant to the linguistic conversation [41, 3, 93].”
BackgroundBühlmann, M., & Kriesi, H. (2013) · doi:10.1057/9781137299871_3 · Cited by 832
A Network-based End-to-End Trainable Task-oriented Dialogue System
Wen, T.-H., Vandyke, D., Mrkšić, N., Gašić, M., Rojas-Barahona, L. M., Su, P.-H., Ultes, S., & Young, S. J. (2017) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/e17-1042 · Cited by 807 · cited 1× · see citing works
“These technologies are also known as ‘dialogue systems’ [105].”
BackgroundMeaning and Grammar: An Introduction to Semantics
Chierchia, G., & Mcconnell-Ginet, S. (1990) · Language · doi:10.2307/415078 · Cited by 792 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For an excellent discussion, see Chierchia and McConnell-Ginet (2000). 18There have been several attempts to impute meaning to this sentence, such as Stanford’s competition to show that it is not in fact meaningless; see https://linguistlist.”
BackgroundCreativity: Cognitive, personal, developmental, and social aspects.
Simonton, D. K. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.151 · Cited by 765 · cited 2× · see citing works
“40See Simonton [91],Boden [16], and Sternberg and Lubart [94].”
BackgroundTaxonomy of Risks posed by Language Models
Weidinger, L., Uesato, J., Rauh, M., Griffin, C., Huang, P.-S., Mellor, J., Glaese, A., Cheng, M., Balle, B., Kasirzadeh, A., et al. (2022) · 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533088 · Cited by 764 · cited 2× · see citing works
“To date, efforts to create aligned conversational agents have centred on the identification and mitigation of harms, such as the proliferation of inappropriate stereotypes or of hateful speech [12, 50, 103].”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe Scientist Qua Scientist Makes Value Judgments
Rudner, R. S. (1953) · Philosophia Scientiæ · doi:10.1086/287231 · Cited by 748 · cited 2× · see citing works
“31 Consider, for example, the fact that no scientific hypothesis is ever completely verified (Rudner, 1953).”
BackgroundAlgorithmic Fairness: Choices, Assumptions, and Definitions
Mitchell, S., Potash, E., Barocas, S., D'Amour, A., & Lum, K. (2021) · Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application · doi:10.1146/annurev-statistics-042720-125902 · Cited by 687 · see citing works
The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 1, Reason and the Rationalization of Society
Boyne, R., & Habermas, J. (1986) · British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.2307/590724 · Cited by 667 · cited 4× · see citing works
“35See, for example, Habermas (2016) and Held (2006). 36For a stronger interpretation of these deliberative norms we can turn to Habermas’s theory of deliberative democracy and in his conception of ideal speech Habermas (1984, 1987). Habermas focuses on the possibility of a critical discussion that is inclusive and fre…”
BackgroundInfluentialGalactica: A Large Language Model for Science
Taylor, R., Kardas, M., Cucurull, G., Scialom, T., Hartshorn, A., Saravia, E., Poulton, A., Kerkez, V., & Stojnic, R. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2211.09085 · Cited by 605 · cited 1× · see citing works
“28 One application of conversational agents to the scientific domain is Galactica, which was launched by Meta to assist researchers and students by responding to their science questions Taylor et al. (2022). Galactica is trained on 48 million examples of scientific articles, textbooks, encyclopedias and other sources,…”
BackgroundAre You a Racist or Am I Seeing Things? Annotator Influence on Hate Speech Detection on Twitter
Talat, Z. (2016) · Workshop on Natural Language Processing and Computational Social Science (NLP+CSS) · doi:10.18653/v1/w16-5618 · Cited by 585 · cited 1× · see citing works
“One area in which this plays out is data annotation, and the need to have a diverse set of samplers who are able to adequately capture the implied meaning of terms (Waseem, 2016; Dı́az et al., 2022).”
BackgroundUtterer’s Meaning, Sentence-Meaning, and Word-Meaning
Grice, H. (1968) · Studies in cognitive systems · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-2727-8_2 · Cited by 585 · cited 10× · see citing works
“We suggest that Gricean maxims can help map out the path ahead.”
BackgroundInfluentialThe Pragmatics of What is Said
Récanati, F. (1989) · Mind & Language · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0017.1989.tb00258.x · Cited by 580 · see citing works
Interpretation and Social Criticism
Senchuk, D. M., & Walzer, M. (1992) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2069485 · Cited by 541 · see citing works
McGregor, J. (2018) · Journal of Object Technology · doi:10.5381/jot.2005.4.7.c4 · Cited by 534 · cited 1×
“and about the situation of the participants in that discourse — and it sets the boundaries of the situation relevant to the linguistic conversation (Grice, 1981; Allan, 2013; Stalnaker, 2014).”
BackgroundScience, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal
Anderton, D. (2010) · University of Pittsburgh Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctt6wrc78 · Cited by 529 · cited 3× · see citing works
“32Heather Douglas [31] has explored how judgements about the seriousness of social consequences im- pact the amount of evidence scientists demand before declaring a chemical toxic.”
BackgroundAudience Design in Meaning and Reference
Clark, H. H., & Murphy, G. L. (1982) · Advances in psychology · doi:10.1016/s0166-4115(09)60059-5 · Cited by 513 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This includes relational considerations such as the intended audience, their level of familiarity with a given topic, the specific role of the language technology, and the underlying power relationships between interlocutors (see, for example, Androutsopoulos [6], Bell [26], and Clark and Murphy [26]).”
BackgroundEthical and social risks of harm from Language Models
Weidinger, L., Mellor, J., Rauh, M., Griffin, C., Uesato, J., Huang, P.-S., Cheng, M., Glaese, M., Balle, B., Kasirzadeh, A., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2112.04359 · Cited by 477 · see citing works
Self-citationPersistent Anti-Muslim Bias in Large Language Models
Abid, A., Farooqi, M., & Zou, J. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society · doi:10.1145/3461702.3462624 · Cited by 476 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Does the same notion of truth apply across a wide range of conversational contexts, or might standards of truthfulness vary according to the subject under consideration and to relevant conversational norms? Equally, there is widespread concern that the output of large-scale language models is biased [1, 15].”
BackgroundAnthropomorphism of computers: Is it mindful or mindless?
Kim, Y., & Sundar, S. S. (2012) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.09.006 · Cited by 462 · see citing works
The universality of conversational postulates
Keenan, E. O. (1976) · Language in Society · doi:10.1017/s0047404500006850 · Cited by 459 · cited 2× · see citing works
“28For critical discussion of Gricean maxims, questions about their universality, and alternative proposals, see Frederking [35], Keenan [56], Sperber and Wilson [92], and Wierzbicka [106].”
BackgroundAlgorithmic Accountability and Public Reason
Binns, R. (2018) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-017-0263-5 · Cited by 457 · cited 2× · see citing works
“With further research, it may be 42See, for example, Binns [14], Lee et al. [64], Gabriel [37], and Bondi et al. [18]. possible to use our framework to refine both human and automatic evaluation of the performance of conversational agents.”
BackgroundCreativity and Artificial Intelligence
Pereira, F. C. (2007) · doi:10.1515/9783110198560 · Cited by 449 · cited 3× · see citing works
“41See Simonton (2000), Boden (1998), and Sternberg & Lubart (1999). 42Evans et al. (2021) discuss creative uses of expressivess and commissives.”
BackgroundInfluentialOn the logic of demonstratives
Kaplan, D. (1979) · Journal of Philosophical Logic · doi:10.1007/bf00258420 · Cited by 432 · cited 1×
“22For contemporary philosophical examinations of linguistic context, see Kaplan (1979) and Stalnaker (2014).”
BackgroundAnderson, E. (2004) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2004.tb01266.x · Cited by 400 · cited 2× · see citing works
“31For example Elizabeth Anderson [5] has shown that researchers’ conceptualisation of divorce as something negative, rather than as a positive phenomenon, impacts the way they collect and analyse data.”
BackgroundTheories of truth : a critical introduction
Kirkham, R. L. (1995) · doi:10.2307/2108451 · Cited by 373 · cited 1×
“However, there are other options for making sense of ‘truth’ (Kirkham, 1992).”
BackgroundCognitive and Non-Cognitive Values in Science: Rethinking the Dichotomy
Longino, H. E. (1996) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-1742-2_3 · Cited by 354 · cited 2× · see citing works
“This discursive domain is particularly relevant 30The clear-cut distinction between epistemic and non-epistemic value judgements is challenged by Rooney [84] and Longino [67].”
Fine-tuning language models to find agreement among humans with diverse preferencesPreprint
Bakker, M. A., Chadwick, M., Sheahan, H., et al. (2022) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2211.15006 · Cited by 353 · cited 1× · see citing works
“matters (Bakker et al., 2022), and the government of Taiwan has pioneered the use of digital platforms as a mechanism to enhance democratic decision-making.”
BackgroundMcMullin, E. (1982) · PSA Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association · doi:10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1982.2.192409 · Cited by 347 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Nonetheless, these virtues may still need to be balanced against one another in order for a scientific claim to be acceptable [61, 70].”
BackgroundArtificial Morality: Top-down, Bottom-up, and Hybrid Approaches
Allen, C., Smit, I., & Wallach, W. (2005) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-006-0004-4 · Cited by 346 · cited 1× · see citing works
“[4] for an introduction to a top-down approach.”
Feminism and linguistic theory
Deuchar, M. (1987) · doi:10.1016/0271-5309(87)90015-2 · Cited by 342 · cited 2×
“It could be enriched further through analysis of other sociological and philosophical traditions such as Luhmann’s (1995) system theory, Latour’s (2007) actor-network theory, or Cameron’s (1992) feminist analysis of linguistic theory.”
BackgroundScientific Explanation and the Sense of Understanding
Trout, J. D. (2002) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/341050 · Cited by 331 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Scientists pursue different goals in advancing scientific knowledge: they use science to explain or understand things about the world [87, 97], such as the formation of clouds; to predict phenomena [88], such as the structure of proteins; or to control the world around us [68] via, for example, the development of medi…”
BackgroundThree Normative Models of Democracy
Habermas, J. (1994) · Democracy and Difference · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8675.1994.tb00001.x · Cited by 308 · cited 1× · see citing works
“16For discussion of the connections between syntax and semantics, see Heim and Kratzer (1185). 17There are many theories about how semantic analysis should be approached.”
BackgroundClaussmann-Chong, C. (2013) · doi:10.4324/9780203850947-12 · Cited by 291
Machine Theory of MindPreprint
Rabinowitz, N. C., Perbet, F., Song, H. F., Zhang, C., Eslami, S. M. A., & Botvinick, M. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1802.07740 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
Scaling Language Models: Methods, Analysis & Insights from Training Gopher
Rae, J. W., Borgeaud, S., Cai, T., Millican, K., Hoffmann, J., Song, F., Aslanides, J., Henderson, S., Ring, R., Young, S., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2112.11446 · Cited by 235 · cited 1× · see citing works
“2For GPT-3, see [19]; for BERT, see [28]; for Turing-NLG-A-17, see [85]; for CLIP, see [81]; for Gopher, see [82].”
BackgroundSelf-citationNonepistemic Values and the Multiple Goals of Science
Elliott, K. C., & McKaughan, D. J. (2014) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/674345 · Cited by 222 · cited 1× · see citing works
“29 Given that the focus is on scientific discourse, the cooperative goal of the discourse can be understood in relation to the diverse aims of the sciences [32, 78, 79].”
BackgroundLinguistic communication and the semantics/pragmatics distinction
Carston, R. (2007) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-007-9191-8 · Cited by 214 · cited 1× · see citing works
“See, for example, Leech [65] and Carston [23] for discussion.”
BackgroundCalhoun, C. (2000) · Philosophy & Public Affairs · doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.2000.00251.x · Cited by 206 · see citing works
Asher, N. M., & Alex Lascarides, Y. (2013) · Semantics and Pragmatics · doi:10.3765/sp.6.2 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
A Note on Science and Democracy? Robert K. Mertons Ethos of Science
Menke, C. (2015) · doi:10.1515/9783110375008-013 · Cited by 198
Languaging when contexts collapse: Audience design in social networking
Androutsopoulos, J. (2014) · Discourse Context & Media · doi:10.1016/j.dcm.2014.08.006 · Cited by 182 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This includes relational considerations such as the intended audience, their level of familiarity with a given topic, the specific role of the language technology, and the underlying power relationships between interlocutors (see, for example, Androutsopoulos [6], Bell [26], and Clark and Murphy [26]).”
BackgroundEthical Challenges in Data-Driven Dialogue Systems
Henderson, P., Sinha, K., Gontier, N., Ke, N. R., Fried, G., Lowe, R., & Pineau, J. (2018) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society · doi:10.1145/3278721.3278777 · Cited by 166 · cited 3× · see citing works
“3 However, early instances of these models also present a number of risks and possible failure modes, including the production of false, offensive, or irrelevant information that could lead to a range of harms [15, 50, 104].”
BackgroundScience as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry
LONGINO, H. E. (2020) · doi:10.2307/j.ctvx5wbfz · Cited by 161 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However, it has been shown that, in practice, scientists inevitably make choices on the basis of ethical beliefs, their perception of the social good derived from those beliefs, and other value judgements [31, 86, 66].”
BackgroundPragmatic reasoning through semantic inference
Bergen, L., Lévy, R., & Goodman, N. D. (2016) · Semantics and Pragmatics · doi:10.3765/sp.9.20 · Cited by 159 · cited 3× · see citing works
“20 For excellent introductions to the topic of pragmatics, see Grice (1968), Grice (1989), Recanati (1989), Horn and Ward (2008), Stalnaker (2014), Thomas (1995), Goodman and Lassiter (2015), and Bergen et al. (2016). 21Schools of pragmatics differ with respect to how they draw the boundary between semantics and pragm…”
BackgroundInfluentialStereotyping Norwegian Salmon: An Inventory of Pitfalls in Fairness Benchmark Datasets
Blodgett, S. L., Lopez, G., Olteanu, A., Sim, R., & Wallach, H. (2021) · Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.81 · Cited by 147 · cited 2× · see citing works
“3 However, early instances of these models also present a number of risks and possible failure modes, including the production of false, offensive, or irrelevant information that could lead to a range of harms [15, 50, 104].”
BackgroundA General Language Assistant as a Laboratory for Alignment
Askell, A., Bai, Y., Chen, A., Drain, D., Ganguli, D., Henighan, T., Jones, A., Joseph, N., Mann, B., DasSarma, N., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2112.00861 · Cited by 146 · cited 1× · see citing works
“[9] propose three ideals – helpfulness, honesty, and harmlessness – that can help align conversational agents with human values.”
BackgroundExplorations in semantics and pragmatics
Leech, G. (1980) · doi:10.2307/413554 · Cited by 144 · cited 1×
“See, for example, Leech [65] and Carston [23] for discussion.”
BackgroundUnderstanding the Capabilities, Limitations, and Societal Impact of Large Language Models
Tamkin, A., Brundage, M., Clark, J., & Ganguli, D. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2102.02503 · Cited by 135 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Conversational agents have been shown to perform well on a variety of computational metrics, supporting the emergence of new kinds of capability and opportunity [17, 95].”
BackgroundKajtez, I. (2011) · doi:10.2298/aoo1104086k · Cited by 132 · cited 1×
“Scientists pursue different goals in advancing scientific knowledge: they use science to explain or understand things about the world [87, 97], such as the formation of clouds; to predict phenomena [88], such as the structure of proteins; or to control the world around us [68] via, for example, the development of medi…”
Appearing Respectful: The Moral Significance of Manners*
Buss, S. (1999) · Ethics: An International Journal of Social, Political, and Legal Philosophy · doi:10.1086/233946 · Cited by 128 · cited 2×
“Consider, for example, ostentatious or selfablating demonstrations of respect that may be demanded in hierarchical, patriarchal, racist, or caste-based societies [21].”
BackgroundOn Values in Science: Is the Epistemic/Non-Epistemic Distinction Useful?
Rooney, P. (1992) · PSA Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association · doi:10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1992.1.192740 · Cited by 125 · cited 2× · see citing works
“This discursive domain is particularly relevant 30The clear-cut distinction between epistemic and non-epistemic value judgements is challenged by Rooney [84] and Longino [67].”
Political Theory and Feminist Social Criticism
Ackerly, B. (2000) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511490149 · Cited by 118 · cited 1×
“must themselves be subjected to reflective evaluation and critique (Ackerly, 2000; Walzer, 1993).”
BackgroundPrediction in science and policy
Sarewitz, D., & Pielke, R. (1999) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/s0160-791x(99)00002-0 · Cited by 116 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Scientists pursue different goals in advancing scientific knowledge: they use science to explain or understand things about the world [87, 97], such as the formation of clouds; to predict phenomena [88], such as the structure of proteins; or to control the world around us [68] via, for example, the development of medi…”
BackgroundEnvisioning Communities: A Participatory Approach Towards AI for Social Good
Bondi, E., Xu, L., Acosta-Navas, D., & Killian, J. A. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society · doi:10.1145/3461702.3462612 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Probabilistic Semantics and Pragmatics Uncertainty in Language and Thought
Goodman, N. D., & Lassiter, D. (2015) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118882139.ch21 · Cited by 115 · cited 2× · see citing works
“21For excellent introductions to the topic of pragmatics, see Grice [40, 42], Recanati [83], Horn and Ward [51], Stalnaker [93], Thomas [96], Goodman and Lassiter [39], and Bergen et al. [13].”
BackgroundChallenges in Detoxifying Language Models
Welbl, J., Glaese, A., Uesato, J., Dathathri, S., Mellor, J., Hendricks, L. A., Anderson, K., Kohli, P., Coppin, B., & Huang, P.-S. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2021 · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-emnlp.210 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Rethinking search: making domain experts out of dilettantes
Metzler, D., Tay, Y., Bahri, D., & Najork, M. (2021) · ACM SIGIR Forum · doi:10.1145/3476415.3476428 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
CPM: A large-scale generative Chinese Pre-trained language model
Zhang, Z., Han, X., Zhou, H., Ke, P., Gu, Y., Ye, D., Qin, Y., Su, Y., Ji, H., Guan, J., et al. (2021) · AI Open · doi:10.1016/j.aiopen.2021.07.001 · Cited by 110 · cited 1× · see citing works
“12There are a variety of non-English language models [107].”
BackgroundToward a Theory of Justice for Artificial Intelligence
Gabriel, I. (2021) · Daedalus · doi:10.1162/daed_a_01911 · Cited by 84
Self-citationWiggins, B. E. (2019) · The Contemporary Medieval in Practice · doi:10.4324/9780429492303-6 · Cited by 81
Potochnik, A. (2015) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A · doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2015.05.008 · Cited by 81 · cited 1× · see citing works
“29 Given that the focus is on scientific discourse, the cooperative goal of the discourse can be understood in relation to the diverse aims of the sciences [32, 78, 79].”
BackgroundThe Pragmatist Theory of Truth
Haack, S. (1976) · British Journal for the Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1093/bjps/27.3.231 · Cited by 69 · cited 1×
“Finally, the pragmatic theory ties truth, in one way or another, to human needs and the resolution of problematic situations (for a great discussion, see Haack [43]).”
BackgroundHabermas’ theory of communication: A critical explication
Burleson, B. R., & Kline, S. L. (1979) · Quarterly Journal of Speech · doi:10.1080/00335637909383492 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Li, Y.-H., Wang, A., Xie, Y., et al. (2025) · Chinese Conference on Pattern Recognition and Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-5764-6_38 · Cited by 52
Kenton, Z., Everitt, T., Weidinger, L., Gabriel, I., Mikulik, V., & Irving, G. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.14659 · Cited by 45 · cited 1× · see citing works
“[57] explore the ways in which human designers may misspecify objectives for conversational agents and propose mitigation strategies to avoid the creation of accidentally misaligned conversational agents.”
BackgroundSelf-citationAlgorithmic Fairness and Structural Injustice: Insights from Feminist Political Philosophy
Kasirzadeh, A. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society · doi:10.1145/3514094.3534188 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Self-citationTruthful AI: Developing and governing AI that does not lie
Evans, O., Cotton-Barratt, O., Finnveden, L., Bales, A., Balwit, A., Wills, P., Righetti, L., & Saunders, W. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.06674 · Cited by 39 · cited 3× · see citing works
“[33] discuss creative uses of expressivess and commissives.”
BackgroundInfluentialDyer, C. (2015) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli_r_00212 · Cited by 38
Ladegaard, H. J. (2008) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.021 · Cited by 38 · cited 8× · see citing works
“It could be enriched further through analysis of other sociological and philosophical traditions such as Luhmann’s (1995) system theory, Latour’s (2007) actor-network theory, or Cameron’s (1992) feminist analysis of linguistic theory.”
BackgroundInfluentialMaibom, H. L. (2007) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515080701545981 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Natural Language Processing and Computational Linguistics 1: Speech, Morphology and Syntax
Kurdi, M. (2016) · doi:10.1002/9781119145554 · Cited by 20
Natural Language Processing: Semantic Aspects
Kapetanios, E., Tatar, D., & Săcărea, C. (2013) · doi:10.1201/b15472 · Cited by 17 · cited 2×
“18 Semantic norms, therefore, provide a template for the generation of comprehensible sentences and comprise a second important area of research for the evaluation of language agents (see Kapetanios et al. (2013) and Maulud et al. (2021) for some examples of such research efforts).”
BackgroundLinguistic Theory: Syntax, Semantics, Pragmatics
Silverstein, M. (1972) · doi:10.1146/annurev.an.01.100172.002025 · Cited by 16 · cited 2×
“14See, for example, Morris [76], Montague [75], and Silverstein [90].”
BackgroundToward a Theory of Justice for Animals
Garner, R. (2012) · doi:10.5406/janimalethics.2.1.0098 · Cited by 14
The Challenge of Value Alignment: from Fairer Algorithms to AI SafetyPreprint
Gabriel, I., & Ghazavi, V. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2101.06060 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Self-citationThe correspondence theory of truth
Bunge, M. (2012) · doi:10.1515/sem-2012-0004 · Cited by 13 · cited 1×
“Roughly speaking, a correspondence theory of truth holds that what one believes or says is true if it corresponds to the way things actually are in the world (for a contemporary exposition, see Bunge [20]).”
BackgroundAccounting for Offensive Speech as a Practice of Resistance
Díaz, M., Amironesei, R., Weidinger, L., & Gabriel, I. (2022) · Workshop on Online Abuse and Harms (WOAH) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.woah-1.18 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Self-citationA New Role for Mathematics in Empirical Sciences
Kasirzadeh, A. (2021) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/713906 · Cited by 5 · cited 3× · see citing works
“(2021), and Kasirzadeh Kasirzadeh (2022) for some discussion. 7There is also a second functional meaning of ‘good speech’ which is defined at a higher-level of abstraction (See Kasirzadeh & Klein (2021) for levels of abstraction in machine learning systems).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationKasirzadeh, A., & Klein, C. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society · doi:10.1145/3461702.3462606 · Cited by 4 · cited 2× · see citing works
“8There is also a second functional meaning of ‘good speech’ which is defined at a higher-level of abstraction (See Kasirzadeh and Klein [55] for levels of abstraction in machine learning systems).”
BackgroundSelf-citationLoughnan, A. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108596367.008
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
ChatGPT and the rise of large language models: the new AI-driven infodemic threat in public health
De Angelis, L., Baglivo, F., Arzilli, G., Privitera, G. P., Ferragina, P., Tozzi, A. E., & Rizzo, C. (2023) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1166120 · Cited by 708 · see citing works
“This can be explained since the objective of many LLMs, including GPT-3, is to predict the next element in a text, based on a large corpus of text data from the internet, (15) thus LLMs learn to replicate biases and stereotypes present in that data (16).”
BackgroundAI in the Foreign Language Classroom: A Pedagogical Overview of Automated Writing Assistance Tools
Alharbi, W. (2023) · Education Research International · doi:10.1155/2023/4253331 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
“Simply put, language modeling is associated with predicting what word should come next considering what word preceded it [100].”
BackgroundAuditing large language models: a three-layered approach
Mökander, J., Schuett, J., Kirk, H. R., & Floridi, L. (2024) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-023-00289-2 · Cited by 289 · see citing works
ChatGPT: deconstructing the debate and moving it forward
Coeckelbergh, M., & Gunkel, D. J. (2023) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-023-01710-4 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Mirowski, P., Love, J., Mathewson, K., & Mohamed, S. (2024) · The 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3630106.3658993 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Mustapha, K. B., Mustapha, K. B., Yap, E. H., & Abakr, Y. A. (2024) · Interactive Technology and Smart Education · doi:10.1108/itse-10-2023-0198 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Basic values in artificial intelligence: comparative factor analysis in Estonia, Germany, and Sweden
Masso, A., Kaun, A., & van Noordt, C. (2023) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-023-01750-w · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Guo, Y., Wang, H., Ren, X., Wang, T., Chen, W., Xu, Z., & Ge, H. (2025) · Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine · doi:10.1111/jebm.70004 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“Nonetheless, GPT-3 may replicate the biases in web texts, leading to negative behaviors such as fabricating facts, perpetuating stereotypes, and producing logical fallacies [30, 31].”
AI AssertionPreprint
Butlin, P., & Viebahn, E. (2023) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/pfjzu · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Mustapha, K. B., Mustapha, K. B., Yap, E. H., et al. (2024) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.170792405.51299882/v1 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Lan, X., & Shu, H. (2024) · Trans/Form/Ação · doi:10.1590/0101-3173.2024.v47.n6.e02400332 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Borrego, M. M. (2025) · Revista Brasileira de Lingüística Aplicada · doi:10.1590/1984-6398202545036 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Large Language Models: A Historical and Sociocultural Perspective
Ji, E. Y. (2024) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.13430 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-Pluralising Culture Alignment for Large Language ModelsPreprint
Xu, S., Leng, Y., Yu, L., & Xiong, D. (2024) · Qeios · doi:10.32388/q7ywfv · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Editorial. Who, or what, to believe
Link, M. J., & Carlson, M. L. (2023) · Journal of neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/2023.8.jns231656
- Authors
- Kasirzadeh, A., & Gabriel, I.
- Affiliations
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- Google DeepMind (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Kasirzadeh, Atoosa
- Gabriel, Iason
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2022
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 2210-5433 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2209.00731
- OpenAlex
- W4366390744
- Cited by
- 128
- References
- 105
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 31.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Philosophy & Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PhilSci-Archive (University of Pittsburgh) (acceptedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
- Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- DeepMind
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
- Keywords
- chatbots, large language models, value alignment, linguistic communication, human-agent interaction, AI ethics, agent design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review