The DOI matches its DataCite record; 59 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measuring and Narrowing the Compositionality Gap in Language Models
Open accessAbstract
We investigate the ability of language models to perform compositional reasoning tasks where the overall solution depends on correctly composing the answers to sub-problems. We measure how often models can correctly answer all sub-problems but not generate the overall solution, a ratio we call the compositionality gap. We evaluate this ratio by asking multi-hop questions with answers that require composing multiple facts unlikely to have been observed together during pretraining. In the GPT-3 family of models, as model size increases we show that the single-hop question answering performance improves faster than the multi-hop performance does, therefore the compositionality gap does not decrease. This surprising result suggests that while more powerful models memorize and recall more factual knowledge, they show no corresponding improvement in their ability to perform this kind of compositional reasoning. We then demonstrate how elicitive prompting (such as chain of thought) narrows the compositionality gap by reasoning explicitly. We present a new method, self-ask, that further improves on chain of thought. In our method, the model explicitly asks itself (and answers) follow-up questions before answering the initial question. We finally show that self-ask's structured prompting lets us easily plug in a search engine to answer the follow-up questions, which additionally improves accuracy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Existing benchmarks, such as HotpotQA [59], Bamboogle [38], and 2wiki [21], are often cited as multi-hop benchmarks, yet they typically involve only two information-seeking steps. Moreover, these datasets are not explicitly structured to support long-horizon interactions that necessitate the agent to manage the memory state.”
From MEM1: Learning to Synergize Memory and Reasoning for Efficient Long-Horizon Agents (2025) · cites this paper as [38]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Improved performance in reasoning tasks can be gained by encouraging language models to first generate internal thoughts or reasoning chains before responding (Wei et al., 2022; Adolphs et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2022; Lanchantin et al., 2023), as well as updating their initial response through self-critique (Press et al., 2022; Madaan et al., 2023).”
From Chain-of-Verification Reduces Hallucination in Large Language Models (2023) · cites this paper as Press et al., 2022
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Simpler decomposition methods like Self-Ask [21] often broaden context too aggressively, triggering the dilution trap.”
From Replace, Don't Expand: Mitigating Context Dilution in Multi-Hop RAG via Fixed-Budget Evidence Assembly (2025) · cites this paper as [21]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“as well as updating their initial response through self-critique (Press et al., 2022; Madaan et al., 2023)”
From Chain-of-Verification Reduces Hallucination in Large Language Models (2024) · cites this paper as Press et al., 2022
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“SelfAsk (Press et al., 2022) prompts LLMs to decompose a question into subquestions and answers these subquestions by issuing separate calls to the Google Search API.”
From Interleaving Retrieval with Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Knowledge-Intensive Multi-Step Questions (2023) · cites this paper as Press et al., 2022
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“More sophisticated RAG methods, which perform multiple steps of retrieval and generation from an LLM, are even able to integrate information across new or updated knowledge elements[38, 64, 72, 78, 88, 90, 92], another crucial aspect of long-term memory systems.”
From HippoRAG: Neurobiologically Inspired Long-Term Memory for Large Language Models (2024) · cites this paper as [64]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Our experiments show that FRESH- PROMPT outperforms both competing search engine-augmented prompting methods such as SELF-ASK (Press et al., 2022) as well as commercial systems such as PERPLEXITY.AI.”
From FreshLLMs: Refreshing Large Language Models with Search Engine Augmentation (2024) · cites this paper as Press et al., 2022
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Lastly, we note that our QA scores exceed those reported by recent works on few-shot prompting for open-domain QA (ODQA) (Khot et al., 2023;Press et al., 2022;Yao et al., 2022), although a fair apples-to-apples comparison with them isn't possible (cf.Appendix C).”
From Interleaving Retrieval with Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Knowledge-Intensive Multi-Step Questions (2023) · cites this paper as Press et al., 2022
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“IRCoT is SOTA for few-shot multistep ODQA.14”
From Interleaving Retrieval with Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Knowledge-Intensive Multi-Step Questions (2023) · cites this paper as Press et al., 2022
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.14165 · Cited by 23,372
Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models
Wei, J., Wang, X., Schuurmans, D., Bosma, M., Ichter, B., Xia, F., Chi, E., Le, Q., & Zhou, D. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2201.11903 · Cited by 4,263
Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks
Lewis, P., Perez, E., Piktus, A., Petroni, F., Karpukhin, V., Goyal, N., Küttler, H., Lewis, M., Yih, W.-T., Rocktäschel, T., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.11401 · Cited by 3,101
Self-citationA Diversity-Promoting Objective Function for Neural Conversation Models
Li, J., Galley, M., Brockett, C., Gao, J., & Dolan, B. (2016) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/n16-1014 · Cited by 2,459
Large language models are zero-shot reasoners
Kojima, T., Gu, S. (., Reid, M., Matsuo, Y., & Iwasawa, Y. (2022) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 · doi:10.52202/068431-1613 · Cited by 2,013
Vinyals, O., & Le, Q. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1506.05869 · Cited by 1,400
Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models
Wei, J., Tay, Y., Bommasani, R., Raffel, C., Zoph, B., Borgeaud, S., Yogatama, D., Bosma, M., Zhou, D., Metzler, D., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2206.07682 · Cited by 1,264
Personalizing Dialogue Agents: I have a dog, do you have pets too?
Zhang, S., Dinan, E., Urbanek, J., Szlam, A., Kiela, D., & Weston, J. (2018) · Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-1205 · Cited by 1,177
Neural Responding Machine for Short-Text Conversation
Shang, L., Lu, Z., & Li, H. (2015) · doi:10.3115/v1/p15-1152 · Cited by 1,146
Leveraging Passage Retrieval with Generative Models for Open Domain Question Answering
Izacard, G., & Grave, E. (2021) · Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Main Volume · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-main.74 · Cited by 1,109
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Sewon Min, Victor Zhong, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Han- naneh Hajishirzi. 2019. Multi-hop reading compre- hension through question decomposition and rescor- ing. ArXiv, abs/1906.02916. · arXiv
- Xi Ye and Greg Durrett. 2022. The unreliability of explanations in few-shot in-context learning. ArXiv, abs/2205.03401. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Huang, L., Yu, W., Ma, W., Zhong, W., Feng, Z., Wang, H., Chen, Q., Peng, W., Feng, X., Qin, B., et al. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3703155 · Cited by 4,688
Augmenting large language models with chemistry tools
M. Bran, A., Cox, S., Schilter, O., Baldassari, C., White, A. D., & Schwaller, P. (2024) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-024-00832-8 · Cited by 794
Unleashing the potential of prompt engineering for large language models
CHEN, B. ‐., Zhang, Z., Langrené, N., & Zhu, S. (2025) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2025.101260 · Cited by 1,097
Active Retrieval Augmented Generation
Jiang, Z., Xu, F., Gao, L., Sun, Z., Liu, Q., Dwivedi-Yu, J., Yang, Y., Callan, J., & Neubig, G. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.495 · Cited by 497
Towards Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Survey
Huang, J., & Chang, K. C.-C. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023 · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.67 · Cited by 428
Interleaving Retrieval with Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Knowledge-Intensive Multi-Step Questions
Trivedi, H., Balasubramanian, N., Khot, T., & Sabharwal, A. (2023) · Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.557 · Cited by 349
Plan-and-Solve Prompting: Improving Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by Large Language Models
Wang, L., Xu, W., Lan, Y., Hu, Z., Lan, Y., Lee, R. K.-W., & Lim, E.-P. (2023) · Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.147 · Cited by 344
Query Rewriting in Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models
Ma, X., Gong, Y., He, P., Zhao, H., & Duan, N. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.322 · Cited by 602
Chain-of-Verification Reduces Hallucination in Large Language Models
Dhuliawala, S., Komeili, M., Xu, J., Raileanu, R., Li, X., Celikyilmaz, A., & Weston, J. (2024) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics ACL 2024 · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.findings-acl.212 · Cited by 282
Human-like systematic generalization through a meta-learning neural network
Lake, B. M., & Baroni, M. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06668-3 · Cited by 230
Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback
Madaan, A., Tandon, N., Gupta, P., Hallinan, S., Gao, L., Wiegreffe, S., Alon, U., Dziri, N., Prabhumoye, S., Yang, Y., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.17651 · Cited by 2,314
“Self-ask (Press et al., 2022) ask followup ques when interim ans correct;final wrong few shot none (none)”
BackgroundHuang, L., Yu, W., Ma, W., Zhong, W., Feng, Z., Wang, H., Chen, Q., Peng, W., Feng, X., Qin, B., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.05232 · Cited by 2,516
“A burgeoning line of research (Khot et al., 2022; Yao et al., 2022; Press et al., 2022; He et al., 2023; Trivedi et al., 2023) endeavors to tackle such intricate tasks by decomposing them into more manageable sub-tasks.”
Enabling Large Language Models to Generate Text with Citations
Gao, T., Yen, H., Yu, J., & Chen, D. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.398 · Cited by 216
Query2doc: Query Expansion with Large Language Models
Wang, L., Yang, N., & Wei, F. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.585 · Cited by 214
Enhancing Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models with Iterative Retrieval-Generation Synergy
Shao, Z., Gong, Y., Shen, Y., Huang, M., Duan, N., & Chen, W. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023 · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.620 · Cited by 200
(2024) · doi:10.1145/3704435 · Cited by 184
Towards Open-World Recommendation with Knowledge Augmentation from Large Language Models
Xi, Y., Liu, W., Lin, J., Cai, X., Zhu, H. C., Zhu, J., Chen, B., Tang, R., Zhang, W., & Yu, Y. H. (2024) · ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys) · doi:10.1145/3640457.3688104 · Cited by 306
Hallucination Mitigation for Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models: A Review
Zhang, W., & Zhang, J. (2025) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math13050856 · Cited by 145
Reasoning with Language Model Prompting: A Survey
Qiao, S., Ou, Y., Zhang, N., Chen, X., Yao, Y., Deng, S., Tan, C., Huang, F., & Chen, H. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.294 · Cited by 346
TIFA: Accurate and Interpretable Text-to-Image Faithfulness Evaluation with Question Answering
Hu, Y., Liu, B., Kasai, J., Wang, Y., Mari Ostendorf, E., Krishna, R., & Smith, N. A. (2023) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv51070.2023.01866 · Cited by 267
Self-citationBridging the Gulf of Envisioning: Cognitive Challenges in Prompt Based Interactions with LLMs
Subramonyam, H., Pea, R. D., Pondoc, C., Agrawala, M., & Seifert, C. M. (2024) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642754 · Cited by 247
Large Language Models Can Be Easily Distracted by Irrelevant Context
Shi, F., Chen, X., Misra, K., Scales, N., Dohan, D., Chi, E., Schärli, N., & Zhou, D. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.00093 · Cited by 134
“…al., 2022; Shi et al., 2022b, inter alia ), problem decomposition (Zhou et al., 2022; Drozdov et al., 2022; Dohan et al., 2022; Khot et al., 2022; Press et al., 2022, inter alia ), generating programs (Austin et al., 2021; Chowdhery et al., 2022; Gao et al., 2022; Chen et al., 2022, inter alia…”
BackgroundTowards Understanding Chain-of-Thought Prompting: An Empirical Study of What Matters
Wang, B., Min, S., Deng, X., Shen, J., Wu, Y., Zettlemoyer, L., & Sun, H. (2023) · Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.153 · Cited by 120
Self-citationLanguage Model Behavior: A Comprehensive Survey
Chang, T. A., & Bergen, B. K. (2024) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli_a_00492 · Cited by 105
Barman, D., Guo, Z., & Conlan, O. (2024) · Machine Learning with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.mlwa.2024.100545 · Cited by 127
DB-GPT: Large Language Model Meets Database
Zhou, X., Sun, Z., & Li, G. (2024) · Data Science and Engineering · doi:10.1007/s41019-023-00235-6 · Cited by 83
Few-shot Fine-tuning vs. In-context Learning: A Fair Comparison and Evaluation
Mosbach, M., Pimentel, T., Ravfogel, S., Klakow, D., & Elazar, Y. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.779 · Cited by 171
Limitations of large language models in clinical problem-solving arising from inflexible reasoning
Kim, J., Podlasek, A., Shidara, K., Liu, F., Alaa, A., & Bernardo, D. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-22940-0 · Cited by 78
Large models for intelligent transportation systems and autonomous vehicles: A survey
Gan, L., Chu, W., Li, G., Tang, X., & Li, K. (2024) · Advanced Engineering Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.aei.2024.102786 · Cited by 81
From Matching to Generation: A Survey on Generative Information Retrieval
Li, X., Jin, J., Zhou, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhang, P., Zhu, Y., & Dou, Z. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3722552 · Cited by 172
Agentic Large Language Models, a Survey
Plaat, A., Van Duijn, M., Van Stein, N., Preuss, M., Van der Putten, P., & Batenburg, K. J. (2025) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.1.18675 · Cited by 75
FreshLLMs: Refreshing Large Language Models with Search Engine Augmentation
Vu, T., Iyyer, M., Wang, X., Constant, N., Wei, J., Wei, J., Tar, C., Sung, Y.-H., Zhou, D., Le, Q., et al. (2024) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics ACL 2024 · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.findings-acl.813 · Cited by 73
Synthetic Data Generation Using Large Language Models: Advances in Text and Code
Nadas, M. D., Dioşan, L. S., & Tomescu, A. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3589503 · Cited by 161
Self-Knowledge Guided Retrieval Augmentation for Large Language Models
Wang, Y., Li, P., Sun, M., & Liu, Y. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.691 · Cited by 141
Natural Language Reasoning, A Survey
Yu, F., Zhang, H., Tiwari, P., & Wang, B. (2024) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3664194 · Cited by 131
DSPy: Compiling Declarative Language Model Calls into Self-Improving Pipelines
Khattab, O., Singhvi, A., Maheshwari, P., Zhang, Z., Santhanam, K., Vardhamanan, S., Haq, S., Sharma, A., Joshi, T. T., Moazam, H., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.03714 · Cited by 911
“Zhang et al. (2022) reports 48% for text-davinci-002, close to our results using llama2-13b, and 63% with codex using CoT.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialFact-Checking Complex Claims with Program-Guided Reasoning
Pan, L., Wu, X., Lu, X., Luu, A. T., Wang, W. Y., Kan, M., & Nakov, P. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.386 · Cited by 130
LM vs LM: Detecting Factual Errors via Cross Examination
Cohen, R., Hamri, M., Geva, M., & Globerson, A. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.778 · Cited by 60
Verify-and-edit: A knowledge-enhanced chain-of-thought framework
Zhao, R., Li, X., Joty, S., Qin, C., & Bing, L. (2023) · Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.320 · Cited by 55
Towards LLM-based Fact Verification on News Claims with a Hierarchical Step-by-Step Prompting Method
Zhang, X., & Gao, W. (2023) · International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing and Conference of the Asia-Pacific Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (IJCNLP-AACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.ijcnlp-main.64 · Cited by 130
CRITIC: Large Language Models Can Self-Correct with Tool-Interactive Critiquing
Gou, Z., Shao, Z., Gong, Y., Shen, Y., Yang, Y., Duan, N., & Chen, W. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.11738 · Cited by 561
Large Language Model Instruction Following: A Survey of Progresses and Challenges
Lou, R., Zhang, K., & Yin, W. (2024) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli_a_00523 · Cited by 133
(2023) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.971 · Cited by 55
AutoWebGLM: A Large Language Model-based Web Navigating Agent
Lai, H., Liu, X., Iong, I. L., Yao, S., Chen, Y., Shen, P., Yu, H., Zhang, H., Zhang, X., Dong, Y., et al. (2024) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3637528.3671620 · Cited by 146
From language to action: a review of large language models as autonomous agents and tool users
Chowa, S. S., Alvi, R., Rahman, S. S., Rahman, M. A., Raiaan, M. A. K., Islam, M. R., Hussain, M., & Azam, S. (2026) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-025-11471-9 · Cited by 50
Enhancing Text-to-SQL Capabilities of Large Language Models: A Study on Prompt Design Strategies
Nan, L., Zhao, Y., Zou, W., Ri, N., Tae, J., Zhang, E., Cohan, A., & Radev, D. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.996 · Cited by 102
ThoughtSource: A central hub for large language model reasoning data
Ott, S., Hebenstreit, K., Liévin, V., Hother, C. E., Moradi, M., Mayrhauser, M., Praas, R., Winther, O., & Samwald, M. (2023) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-023-02433-3 · Cited by 66
TELeR: A General Taxonomy of LLM Prompts for Benchmarking Complex Tasks
Santu, S. K. K., & Feng, D. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.946 · Cited by 91
Complementary Explanations for Effective In-Context Learning
Ye, X., Iyer, S. V., Çelikyılmaz, A., Stoyanov, V., Durrett, G., & Pasunuru, R. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.273 · Cited by 79
Successive Prompting for Decomposing Complex Questions
Dua, D., Gupta, S., Singh, S., & Gardner, M. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.81 · Cited by 106
IdealGPT: Iteratively Decomposing Vision and Language Reasoning via Large Language Models
You, H., Sun, R., Wang, Z., Chen, L., Wang, G., Ayyubi, H., Chang, K.-W., & Chang, S. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.755 · Cited by 75
Design and evaluation of an Autonomous Cyber Defence agent using DRL and an augmented LLM
Loevenich, J. F., Adler, E., Hürten, T., & Lopes, R. R. F. (2025) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2025.111162 · Cited by 57
Chain-of-Verification Reduces Hallucination in Large Language Models
Dhuliawala, S., Komeili, M., Xu, J., Raileanu, R., Li, X., Celikyilmaz, A., & Weston, J. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.11495 · Cited by 42
“…by encouraging language models to first generate internal thoughts or reasoning chains before responding (Wei et al., 2022; Adolphs et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2022; Lan-chantin et al., 2023), as well as updating their initial response through self-critique (Press et al., 2022; Madaan et al., 2023).”
BackgroundExplainable Claim Verification via Knowledge-Grounded Reasoning with Large Language Models
Wang, H., & Shu, K. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.416 · Cited by 83
Cue-CoT: Chain-of-thought Prompting for Responding to In-depth Dialogue Questions with LLMs
Wang, H., Wang, R., Mi, F., Deng, Y., Wang, Z., Liang, B., Xu, R., & Wong, K.-F. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023 · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.806 · Cited by 38
(2023) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.364 · Cited by 38
Xu, S., Pang, L., Shen, H., Cheng, X., & Chua, T. (2024) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3589334.3645363 · Cited by 91
The Reversal Curse: LLMs trained on "A is B" fail to learn "B is A"
Berglund, L., Tong, M., Kaufmann, M., Balesni, M., Stickland, A. C., Korbak, T., & Evans, O. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.12288 · Cited by 36
“Previous research has found similar inconsistencies in LLMs (Fluri et al., 2023; Elazar et al., 2021; Press et al., 2023; Hosseini et al., 2021; Lin et al., 2022; Shi et al., 2023) Forward vs backward recall in humans Does the Reversal Curse apply to humans?”
MethodPrompt Sapper: A LLM-Empowered Production Tool for Building AI Chains
Cheng, Y., Chen, J., Huang, Q. Y., Xing, Z., Xu, X., & Lu, Q. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3638247 · Cited by 35
Thanasi-Boçe, M., & Hoxha, J. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12775-z · Cited by 44
Large Language Models as Tax Attorneys: A Case Study in Legal Capabilities EmergencePreprint
Nay, J. J., Karamardian, D., Lawsky, S. B., Tao, W., Bhat, M., Jain, R., Lee, A. T., Choi, J. H., & Kasai, J. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4476325 · Cited by 32
Subramonyam, H., Thakkar, D., Ku, A., Dieber, J., & Sinha, A. K. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713166 · Cited by 61
The argument for near-term human disempowerment through AI
Dung, L. (2024) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-024-01930-2 · Cited by 43
Performance analysis of large language models in the domain of legal argument mining
Zubaer, A. A., Granitzer, M., & Mitrović, J. (2023) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2023.1278796 · Cited by 37
How Do Large Language Models Capture the Ever-changing World Knowledge? A Review of Recent Advances
Zhang, Z., Fang, M., Chen, L., Namazi‐Rad, M., & Wang, Y.-X. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.516 · Cited by 66
Visconde: Multi-document QA with GPT-3 and Neural Reranking
Pereira, J., Fidalgo, R., Lotufo, R., & Nogueira, R. F. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-28238-6_44 · Cited by 30
DeepResearcher: Scaling Deep Research via Reinforcement Learning in Real-world Environments
Zheng, Y., Fu, D., Hu, X., Cai, X., Ye, L., Lu, P., & Liu, P. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.03160 · Cited by 25
Leveraging Large Language Models for Automatic Smart Contract Generation
Napoli, E. A., Barbàra, F., Gatteschi, V., & Schifanella, C. (2024) · IEEE Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC) · doi:10.1109/compsac61105.2024.00100 · Cited by 29
Exploring Effective Factors for Improving Visual In-Context Learning
Sun, Y., Chen, Q., Wang, J., Wang, J., & Li, Z. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2025.3554410 · Cited by 61
Chern, I.-C., Chern, S., Chen, S., Yuan, W., Feng, K., Zhou, C., He, J., Neubig, G., & Liu, P. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2307.13528 · Cited by 29
“For example, Press et al. (2022); Komeili et al. (2022) gathered information from the Internet to enhance question answering and dialog systems, respectively.”
BackgroundModular Visual Question Answering via Code Generation
Subramanian, S., Narasimhan, M., Khangaonkar, K., Yang, K., Nagrani, A., Schmid, C., Zeng, A., Darrell, T., & Klein, D. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-short.65 · Cited by 45
Shusterman, R., Waters, A. C., O’Neill, S. K., Bangs, M., Luu, P., & Tucker, D. M. (2025) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-025-01516-2 · Cited by 22
LoCal: Logical and Causal Fact-Checking with LLM-Based Multi-Agents
Ma, J., Hu, L., Li, R., & Fu, W. (2025) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3696410.3714748 · Cited by 30
MoT: Memory-of-Thought Enables ChatGPT to Self-Improve
Li, X., & Qiu, X. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.392 · Cited by 53
FIT-RAG: Black-Box RAG with Factual Information and Token Reduction
Mao, Y., Dong, X., Xu, W., Gao, Y., Wei, B., & Zhang, Y. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3676957 · Cited by 39
HippoRAG: Neurobiologically Inspired Long-Term Memory for Large Language Models
Gutiérrez, B. J., Shu, Y., Gu, Y., Yasunaga, M., & Su, Y. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.14831 · Cited by 152
“To limit the experimental cost, we extract 1 , 000 questions from each validation set as done in previous work [48, 61].”
Boosting Your Context by Dual Similarity Checkup for In-Context Learning Medical Image Segmentation
Gao, J. Y., Lao, Q., Kang, Q., Liu, P., Du, C., Li, K., & Zhang, L. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2024.3440311 · Cited by 22
Demystifying Chains, Trees, and Graphs of Thoughts
Besta, M., Memedi, F., Zhang, Z., Gerstenberger, R., Piao, G., Blach, N., Nyczyk, P., Copik, M., Kwaśniewski, G., Müller, J., et al. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2025.3598182 · Cited by 80
Prompting Language Models for Linguistic Structure
Blevins, T., Gonen, H., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.367 · Cited by 36
Russin, J., Pavlick, E., & Frank, M. J. (2025) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2510270122 · Cited by 27
SciSciGPT: advancing human–AI collaboration in the science of science
Shao, E., Wang, Y., Qian, Y., Pan, Z., Liu, H., & Wang, D. (2025) · Nature Computational Science · doi:10.1038/s43588-025-00906-6 · Cited by 45
A Survey of Reasoning with Foundation ModelsPreprint
Sun, J., Zheng, C., Xie, E., Liu, Z., Chu, R., Liu, J., Xu, J., Ding, M., Li, H., Geng, M., et al. (2023) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/ac4sp · Cited by 143
Self-citationProbabilistic Tree-of-thought Reasoning for Answering Knowledge-intensive Complex Questions
Cao, S., Zhang, J., Shi, J., Lv, X., Yao, Z., Tian, Q., Hou, L., & Li, J. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023 · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.835 · Cited by 17
Instruct Me More! Random Prompting for Visual In-Context Learning
Zhang, J., Wang, B., Li, L., Nakashima, Y., & Nagahara, H. (2024) · IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/wacv57701.2024.00258 · Cited by 20
Promises and Pitfalls: Using Large Language Models to Generate Visualization Items
Cui, Y., Ge, L. W., Ding, Y., Harrison, L., Yang, F., & Kay, M. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2024.3456309 · Cited by 31
Huang, J., Wang, M., Cui, Y., Liu, J., Chen, L., Wang, T., Li, H., & Wu, J. (2024) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app142311014 · Cited by 17
Wang, K., Duan, F., Wang, S., Li, P., Xian, Y., Yin, C., Rong, W., & Xiong, Z. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.13259 · Cited by 16
Salikutluk, V., Koert, D., & Jäkel, F. (2023) · Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications · doi:10.3233/faia230081 · Cited by 16
Query Rewriting for Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models
Ma, X., Gong, Y., He, P., Zhao, H., & Duan, N. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.14283 · Cited by 14
“ReAct (Yao et al., 2023) and Self-Ask (Press et al., 2022) combines the Chain-of-Thought (CoT) (Wei et al., 2022; Wang et al., 2022) and inter-actions with web APIs.”
BackgroundContextMate: a context-aware smart agent for efficient data analysis
Jadoon, A. K., Yu, C., & Shi, Y.-C. (2024) · CCF Transactions on Pervasive Computing and Interaction · doi:10.1007/s42486-023-00144-7 · Cited by 15
Learning by thinking in natural and artificial minds
Lombrozo, T. (2024) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2024.07.007 · Cited by 24
Structured knowledge-based causal discovery: Agentic streams of thought
Meier, S., Raut, P. N., Mahr, F., Thielen, N., Franke, J. E., & Risch, F. (2025) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2025.104202 · Cited by 14
FactKB: Generalizable Factuality Evaluation using Language Models Enhanced with Factual Knowledge
Feng, S., Balachandran, V., Bai, Y., & Tsvetkov, Y. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.59 · Cited by 40
Lu, X., Pan, L., Liu, Q., Nakov, P., & Kan, M. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.483 · Cited by 32
ChatLLM network: More brains, more intelligence
Hao, R., Hu, L., Qi, W., Wu, Q., Zhang, Y., & Nie, L. (2025) · AI Open · doi:10.1016/j.aiopen.2025.01.001 · Cited by 53
OpenICL: An Open-Source Framework for In-context Learning
Wu, Z., Wang, Y., Ye, J., Wu, Z., Feng, J., Xu, J., & Qiao, Y. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-demo.47 · Cited by 14
An LLM Compiler for Parallel Function Calling
Kim, S., Moon, S., Tabrizi, R., Lee, N., Mahoney, M. W., Keutzer, K., & Gholami, A. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.04511 · Cited by 12
“Several studies [52, 38, 40, 63, 13] have explored prompting methods of breaking down complex queries into various levels of detail to solve them, thereby improving LLM’s performance in reasoning tasks.”
BackgroundKim, J., Shin, B., Chung, J., & Rhu, M. (2026) · IEEE International Symposium on High-Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA) · doi:10.1109/hpca68181.2026.11408569 · Cited by 64
Toubal, I. E., Avinash, A., Alldrin, N., Dlabal, J., Zhou, W., Luo, E., Stretcu, O., Xiong, H., Lu, C.-T., Zhou, H., et al. (2024) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.01662 · Cited by 15
SiReRAG: Indexing Similar and Related Information for Multihop ReasoningPreprint
Zhang, N., Choubey, P. K., Fabbri, A. R., Bernadett-Shapiro, G., Zhang, R., Mitra, P., Xiong, C., & Wu, C.-S. (2024) · Qeios · doi:10.32388/93o2s3 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Press, O., Zhang, M., Min, S., Schmidt, L., Smith, N. A., & Lewis, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence (US)
- Corresponding author
- Press, Ofir
- ORCID
- Smith, Noah A.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2022
- Pages
- 5687-5711
- arXiv
- 2210.03350
- OpenAlex
- W4389520103
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 90 · 2025: 90 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 52.09
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (2113530)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Keywords
- compositional reasoning, multi-hop question answering, chain-of-thought prompting, GPT-3, model size scaling, structured prompting, search engine integration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
