CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 11Algebraic structures and combinatorial modelsBlack Holes and Theoretical PhysicsNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories

Quantum exponentials for the modular double and applications in gravity models

Open access
Mertens, Thomas G.·2022·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2212.07696arXiv 2212.07696
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

In this note, we propose a decomposition of the quantum matrix group SL$_q^+(2,\mathbb{R})$ as (deformed) exponentiation of the quantum algebra generators of Faddeev's modular double of $\text{U}_q(\mathfrak{sl}(2, \mathbb{R}))$. The formula is checked by relating hyperbolic representation matrices with the Whittaker function. We interpret (or derive) it in terms of Hopf duality, and use it to explicitly construct the regular representation of the modular double, leading to the Casimir and its modular dual as the analogue of the Laplacian on the quantum group manifold. This description is important for both 2d Liouville gravity, and 3d pure gravity, since both are governed by this algebraic structure. This result builds towards a $q$-BF formulation of the amplitudes of both of these gravitational models.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2212.07696

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The amplitudes of the dilaton gravity model obtained from Liouville gravity are governed by an algebraic structure related to the quantum group.

    “The amplitudes of this model are governed by an algebraic structure related to the quantum group. This can be explained directly at the Lagrangian level by the above dilaton potential (5.28) in the Poisson-sigma model framework of Sect. 2.1.1 (Fan and Mertens 2022a; Mertens 2022).”

    From Solvable models of quantum black holes: a review on Jackiw–Teitelboim gravity (2023) · cites this paper as Mertens 2022

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 69

  1. R. Jackiw, Lower Dimensional Gravity, Nucl. Phys. B 252 (1985) 343 [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  2. C. Teitelboim, Gravitation and Hamiltonian Structure in Two Space-Time Dimensions, Phys. Lett. B 126 (1983) 41 [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  3. A. Almheiri and J. Polchinski, Models of AdS 2 backreaction and holography, JHEP 11 (2015) 014 [arXiv:1402.6334] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  4. K. Jensen, Chaos in AdS 2 Holography, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 111601 [arXiv:1605.06098] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  5. J. Maldacena, D. Stanford and Z. Yang, Conformal symmetry and its breaking in two dimensional Nearly Anti-de-Sitter space, PTEP 2016 (2016) 12C104 [arXiv:1606.01857] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  6. J. Engelsöy, T.G. Mertens and H. Verlinde, An investigation of AdS 2 backreaction and holography, JHEP 07 (2016) 139 [arXiv:1606.03438] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  7. J.S. Cotler et al., Black Holes and Random Matrices, JHEP 05 (2017) 118 [Erratum ibid. 09 (2018) 002] [arXiv:1611.04650] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  8. D. Stanford and E. Witten, Fermionic Localization of the Schwarzian Theory, JHEP 10 (2017) 008 [arXiv:1703.04612] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  9. A. Kitaev and S.J. Suh, Statistical mechanics of a two-dimensional black hole, JHEP 05 (2019) 198 [arXiv:1808.07032] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  10. T.G. Mertens, G.J. Turiaci and H.L. Verlinde, Solving the Schwarzian via the Conformal Bootstrap, JHEP 08 (2017) 136 [arXiv:1705.08408] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  11. T.G. Mertens, The Schwarzian theory -origins, JHEP 05 (2018) 036 [arXiv:1801.09605] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  12. H.T. Lam, T.G. Mertens, G.J. Turiaci and H. Verlinde, Shockwave S-matrix from Schwarzian Quantum Mechanics, JHEP 11 (2018) 182 [arXiv:1804.09834] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  13. Z. Yang, The Quantum Gravity Dynamics of Near Extremal Black Holes, JHEP 05 (2019) 205 [arXiv:1809.08647] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  14. P. Saad, S.H. Shenker and D. Stanford, JT gravity as a matrix integral, arXiv:1903.11115 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  15. T.G. Mertens and G.J. Turiaci, Solvable models of quantum black holes: a review on Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity, Living Rev. Rel. 26 (2023) 4 [arXiv:2210.10846] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  16. T. Fukuyama and K. Kamimura, Gauge Theory of Two-dimensional Gravity, Phys. Lett. B 160 (1985) 259 [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  17. K. Isler and C.A. Trugenberger, A Gauge Theory of Two-dimensional Quantum Gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63 (1989) 834 [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  18. A.H. Chamseddine and D. Wyler, Gauge Theory of Topological Gravity in (1 + 1)-Dimensions, Phys. Lett. B 228 (1989) 75 [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  19. R. Jackiw, Gauge theories for gravity on a line, Theor. Math. Phys. 92 (1992) 979 [hep-th/9206093] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  20. E. Witten, On quantum gauge theories in two-dimensions, Commun. Math. Phys. 141 (1991) 153 [INSPIRE]. JHEP09(2023)106 · DOI
  21. E. Witten, Two-dimensional gauge theories revisited, J. Geom. Phys. 9 (1992) 303 [hep-th/9204083] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  22. O. Coussaert, M. Henneaux and P. van Driel, The Asymptotic dynamics of three-dimensional Einstein gravity with a negative cosmological constant, Class. Quant. Grav. 12 (1995) 2961 [gr-qc/9506019] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  23. M. Bershadsky and H. Ooguri, Hidden SL(n) Symmetry in Conformal Field Theories, Commun. Math. Phys. 126 (1989) 49 [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  24. A. Blommaert, T.G. Mertens and H. Verschelde, Fine Structure of Jackiw-Teitelboim Quantum Gravity, JHEP 09 (2019) 066 [arXiv:1812.00918] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  25. A. Blommaert, T.G. Mertens and H. Verschelde, The Schwarzian Theory -A Wilson Line Perspective, JHEP 12 (2018) 022 [arXiv:1806.07765] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  26. Y. Fan and T.G. Mertens, Supergroup structure of Jackiw-Teitelboim supergravity, JHEP 08 (2022) 002 [arXiv:2106.09353] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  27. H.W. Lin, J. Maldacena, L. Rozenberg and J. Shan, Looking at supersymmetric black holes for a very long time, SciPost Phys. 14 (2023) 128 [arXiv:2207.00408] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  28. Y. Fan and T.G. Mertens, From quantum groups to Liouville and dilaton quantum gravity, JHEP 05 (2022) 092 [arXiv:2109.07770] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  29. T.G. Mertens and G.J. Turiaci, Liouville quantum gravity -holography, JT and matrices, JHEP 01 (2021) 073 [arXiv:2006.07072] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  30. J. Teschner, Liouville theory revisited, Class. Quant. Grav. 18 (2001) R153 [hep-th/0104158] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  31. M. Berkooz, P. Narayan and J. Simón, Chord diagrams, exact correlators in spin glasses and black hole bulk reconstruction, JHEP 08 (2018) 192 [arXiv:1806.04380] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  32. M. Berkooz, M. Isachenkov, V. Narovlansky and G. Torrents, Towards a full solution of the large N double-scaled SYK model, JHEP 03 (2019) 079 [arXiv:1811.02584] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  33. H.W. Lin, The bulk Hilbert space of double scaled SYK, JHEP 11 (2022) 060 [arXiv:2208.07032] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  34. D.L. Jafferis, D.K. Kolchmeyer, B. Mukhametzhanov and J. Sonner, JT gravity with matter, generalized ETH, and Random Matrices, arXiv:2209.02131 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  35. A. Goel, V. Narovlansky and H. Verlinde, Semiclassical geometry in double-scaled SYK, arXiv:2301.05732 [INSPIRE]. JHEP09(2023)106 · arXiv
  36. A. Blommaert, T.G. Mertens and S. Yao, Dynamical actions and q-representation theory for double-scaled SYK, arXiv:2306.00941 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  37. T.G. Mertens, J. Simón and G. Wong, A proposal for 3d quantum gravity and its bulk factorization, JHEP 06 (2023) 134 [arXiv:2210.14196] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  38. G. Wong, A note on the bulk interpretation of the Quantum Extremal Surface formula, arXiv:2212.03193 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  39. L.D. Faddeev, Modular double of quantum group, in the proceedings of the Conference Moshe Flato, (2000), p. 149-156 [math/9912078] [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  40. B. Ponsot and J. Teschner, Liouville bootstrap via harmonic analysis on a noncompact quantum group, hep-th/9911110 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  41. B. Ponsot and J. Teschner, Clebsch-Gordan and Racah-Wigner coefficients for a continuous series of representations of U q (sl(2, R)), Commun. Math. Phys. 224 (2001) 613 [math/0007097] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  42. S. Kharchev, D. Lebedev and M. Semenov-Tian-Shansky, Unitary representations of U q (sl(2, R)), the modular double, and the multiparticle q deformed Toda chains, Commun. Math. Phys. 225 (2002) 573 [hep-th/0102180] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  43. A.G. Bytsko and J. Teschner, R operator, coproduct and Haar measure for the modular double of U q (sl(2, R)), Commun. Math. Phys. 240 (2003) 171 [math/0208191] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  44. A.G. Bytsko and J. Teschner, Quantization of models with non-compact quantum group symmetry: Modular XXZ magnet and lattice sinh-Gordon model, J. Phys. A 39 (2006) 12927 [hep-th/0602093] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  45. I. Nidaiev and J. Teschner, On the relation between the modular double of U q (sl(2, R)) and the quantum Teichmueller theory, arXiv:1302.3454 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  46. J. Teschner and G.S. Vartanov, Supersymmetric gauge theories, quantization of M flat , and conformal field theory, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 19 (2015) 1 [arXiv:1302.3778] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  47. I.B. Frenkel and I.C.H. Ip, Positive representations of split real quantum groups and future perspectives, arXiv:1111.1033 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  48. I.C.-H. Ip, Representation of the quantum plane, its quantum double and harmonic analysis on GL + q (2, R), Selecta Math. 19 (2012) 987 [arXiv:1108.5365]. · DOI
  49. I.C.H. Ip, On tensor product decomposition of positive representations of U q q (sl(2, R)), Lett. Math. Phys. 111 (2021) 39 [arXiv:1511.07970] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  50. L. McGough and H. Verlinde, Bekenstein-Hawking Entropy as Topological Entanglement Entropy, JHEP 11 (2013) 208 [arXiv:1308.2342] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  51. S. Jackson, L. McGough and H. Verlinde, Conformal Bootstrap, Universality and Gravitational Scattering, Nucl. Phys. B 901 (2015) 382 [arXiv:1412.5205] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  52. S. Collier, Y. Gobeil, H. Maxfield and E. Perlmutter, Quantum Regge Trajectories and the Virasoro Analytic Bootstrap, JHEP 05 (2019) 212 [arXiv:1811.05710] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  53. L.D. Faddeev, Discrete Heisenberg-Weyl group and modular group, Lett. Math. Phys. 34 (1995) 249 [hep-th/9504111] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  54. M. Blau and G. Thompson, Derivation of the Verlinde formula from Chern-Simons theory and the G/G model, Nucl. Phys. B 408 (1993) 345 [hep-th/9305010] [INSPIRE]. JHEP09(2023)106 · DOI
  55. M. Aganagic, H. Ooguri, N. Saulina and C. Vafa, Black holes, q-deformed 2d Yang-Mills, and non-perturbative topological strings, Nucl. Phys. B 715 (2005) 304 [hep-th/0411280] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  56. R.J. Szabo and M. Tierz, q-deformations of two-dimensional Yang-Mills theory: Classification, categorification and refinement, Nucl. Phys. B 876 (2013) 234 [arXiv:1305.1580] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  57. C. Fronsdal and A. Galindo, The Dual of a quantum group, Lett. Math. Phys. 27 (1993) 59 [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  58. F. Bonechi et al., Exponential mapping for nonsemisimple quantum groups, J. Phys. A 27 (1994) 1307 [hep-th/9311114] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  59. A. Morozov and L. Vinet, Free field representation of group element for simple quantum groups, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 13 (1998) 1651 [hep-th/9409093] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  60. R. Jagannathan and J. Van der Jeugt, Finite dimensional representations of the quantum group GL p,q (2) using the exponential map from U p,q (gl(2)), J. Phys. A 28 (1995) 2819 [hep-th/9411200] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  61. J. Van Der Jeugt, R. Jagannathan and R. Jagannathan, The Exponential map for representations of U p,q (gl(2)), Czech. J. Phys. 46 (1996) 269 [q-alg/9507009] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  62. A. Klimyk and K. Schmudgen, Quantum groups and their representations, Springer (1997) [INSPIRE].
  63. L. Hadasz, M. Pawelkiewicz and V. Schomerus, Self-dual Continuous Series of Representations for U q (sl(2)) and U q (osp(1|2)), JHEP 10 (2014) 091 [arXiv:1305.4596] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  64. L.D. Faddeev, Current-like variables in massive and massless integrable models, in the proceedings of the International School of Physics 'Enrico Fermi': 127th Course: Quantum Groups and Their Physical Applications, (1994), p. 117-136 [hep-th/9408041] [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  65. A. Gerasimov et al., Liouville type models in group theory framework. 1. Finite dimensional algebras, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 12 (1997) 2523 [hep-th/9601161] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  66. P.V. Buividovich and M.I. Polikarpov, Entanglement entropy in gauge theories and the holographic principle for electric strings, Phys. Lett. B 670 (2008) 141 [arXiv:0806.3376] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  67. H. Casini, M. Huerta and J.A. Rosabal, Remarks on entanglement entropy for gauge fields, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 085012 [arXiv:1312.1183] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  68. W. Donnelly, Entanglement entropy and nonabelian gauge symmetry, Class. Quant. Grav. 31 (2014) 214003 [arXiv:1406.7304] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  69. W. Donnelly and L. Freidel, Local subsystems in gauge theory and gravity, JHEP 09 (2016) 102 [arXiv:1601.04744] [INSPIRE]. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mertens, T. G.
Affiliations
Ghent University (BE)
Corresponding author
Mertens, Thomas G.
ORCID
Mertens, Thomas G.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2022
Volume
2023
Issue
9
ISSN
1029-8479 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2212.07696
arXiv
2212.07696
OpenAlex
W4386860141
Cited by
11
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1
FWCI
4.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of High Energy Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • European Commission
  • HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council (101040024)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
Keywords
Casimir operators, Whittaker functions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review