Instruction Tuning with GPT-4
Open accessAbstract
Prior work has shown that finetuning large language models (LLMs) using machine-generated instruction-following data enables such models to achieve remarkable zero-shot capabilities on new tasks, and no human-written instructions are needed. In this paper, we present the first attempt to use GPT-4 to generate instruction-following data for LLM finetuning. Our early experiments on instruction-tuned LLaMA models show that the 52K English and Chinese instruction-following data generated by GPT-4 leads to superior zero-shot performance on new tasks to the instruction-following data generated by previous state-of-the-art models. We also collect feedback and comparison data from GPT-4 to enable a comprehensive evaluation and reward model training. We make our data generated using GPT-4 as well as our codebase publicly available.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ChatGPT and GPT-4 have demonstrated remarkable performance across various tasks, leading to their widespread use as both annotators and evaluators.
“ChatGPT (OpenAI, 2022) and GPT-4 (OpenAI, 2023) have recently demonstrated remarkable performance across various tasks, leading to their widespread use as both the annotators (Peng et al., 2023;Xu et al., 2023) and evaluators (Zheng et al., 2023;Peng et al., 2023;Sun et al., 2023;Zhou et al., 2023;Gao et al., 2023;Wang et al., 2023b;Dubois et al., 2023;Wang et al., 2023a).”
From Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluators (2024) · cites this paper as Peng et al., 2023
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- Amanda Askell, Yuntao Bai, Anna Chen, Dawn Drain, Deep Ganguli, Tom Henighan, Andy Jones, Nicholas Joseph, Ben Mann, Nova DasSarma, et al. A general language assistant as a laboratory for alignment. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.00861, 2021. · arXiv
- Yuntao Bai, Saurav Kadavath, Sandipan Kundu, Amanda Askell, Jackson Kernion, Andy Jones, Anna Chen, Anna Goldie, Azalia Mirhoseini, Cameron McKinnon, et al. Constitutional ai: Harmlessness from ai feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.08073, 2022. · arXiv
- Tom Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared D Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, et al. Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:1877-1901, 2020.
- Hyung Won Chung, Le Hou, Shayne Longpre, Barret Zoph, Yi Tay, William Fedus, Eric Li, Xuezhi Wang, Mostafa Dehghani, Siddhartha Brahma, et al. Scaling instruction-finetuned language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.11416, 2022. · arXiv
- Or Honovich, Thomas Scialom, Omer Levy, and Timo Schick. Unnatural instructions: Tuning language models with (almost) no human labor, 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2212.09689.
- Srinivasan Iyer, Xi Victoria Lin, Ramakanth Pasunuru, Todor Mihaylov, Dániel Simig, Ping Yu, Kurt Shuster, Tianlu Wang, Qing Liu, Punit Singh Koura, et al. Opt-iml: Scaling language model instruction meta learning through the lens of generalization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.12017, 2022. · arXiv
- Geunwoo Kim, Pierre Baldi, and Stephen McAleer. Language models can solve computer tasks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.17491, 2023. · arXiv
- Long Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida, Carroll Wainwright, Pamela Mishkin, Chong Zhang, Sandhini Agarwal, Katarina Slama, Alex Ray, et al. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35: 27730-27744, 2022.
- Baolin Peng, Michel Galley, Pengcheng He, Hao Cheng, Yujia Xie, Yu Hu, Qiuyuan Huang, Lars Liden, Zhou Yu, Weizhu Chen, et al. Check your facts and try again: Improving large language models with external knowledge and automated feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.12813, 2023. · arXiv
- Victor Sanh, Albert Webson, Colin Raffel, Stephen H Bach, Lintang Sutawika, Zaid Alyafeai, Antoine Chaffin, Arnaud Stiegler, Teven Le Scao, Arun Raja, et al. Multitask prompted training enables zero-shot task generalization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.08207, 2021. · arXiv
- Teven Le Scao, Angela Fan, Christopher Akiki, Ellie Pavlick, Suzana Ilić, Daniel Hesslow, Roman Castagné, Alexandra Sasha Luccioni, Franc ¸ois Yvon, Matthias Gallé, et al. Bloom: A 176b- parameter open-access multilingual language model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.05100, 2022. · arXiv
- Hugo Touvron, Thibaut Lavril, Gautier Izacard, Xavier Martinet, Marie-Anne Lachaux, Timothée Lacroix, Baptiste Rozière, Naman Goyal, Eric Hambro, Faisal Azhar, et al. Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13971, 2023. · arXiv
- Yizhong Wang, Yeganeh Kordi, Swaroop Mishra, Alisa Liu, Noah A Smith, Daniel Khashabi, and Hannaneh Hajishirzi. Self-instruct: Aligning language model with self generated instructions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.10560, 2022a. · arXiv
- Yizhong Wang, Swaroop Mishra, Pegah Alipoormolabashi, Yeganeh Kordi, Amirreza Mirzaei, Anjana Arunkumar, Arjun Ashok, Arut Selvan Dhanasekaran, Atharva Naik, David Stap, et al. Benchmarking generalization via in-context instructions on 1,600+ language tasks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.07705, 2022b. · arXiv
- Jason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y Zhao, Kelvin Guu, Adams Wei Yu, Brian Lester, Nan Du, Andrew M Dai, and Quoc V Le. Finetuned language models are zero-shot learners. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.01652, 2021. · arXiv
- Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma, Ed Chi, Quoc Le, and Denny Zhou. Chain of thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.11903, 2022. · arXiv
- Tianbao Xie, Chen Henry Wu, Peng Shi, Ruiqi Zhong, Torsten Scholak, Michihiro Yasunaga, Chien-Sheng Wu, Ming Zhong, Pengcheng Yin, Sida I Wang, et al. UnifiedSKG: Unifying and multi-tasking structured knowledge grounding with text-to-text language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.05966, 2022. · arXiv
- Renrui Zhang, Jiaming Han, Aojun Zhou, Xiangfei Hu, Shilin Yan, Pan Lu, Hongsheng Li, Peng Gao, and Yu Qiao. Llama-adapter: Efficient fine-tuning of language models with zero-init attention. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.16199, 2023. · arXiv
- Susan Zhang, Stephen Roller, Naman Goyal, Mikel Artetxe, Moya Chen, Shuohui Chen, Christopher Dewan, Mona Diab, Xian Li, Xi Victoria Lin, et al. OPT: Open pre-trained transformer language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.01068, 2022. · arXiv
- Ruiqi Zhong, Kristy Lee, Zheng Zhang, and Dan Klein. Adapting language models for zero-shot learning by meta-tuning on dataset and prompt collections. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.04670, 2021. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Huang, L., Yu, W., Ma, W., Zhong, W., Feng, Z., Wang, H., Chen, Q., Peng, W., Feng, X., Qin, B., et al. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3703155 · Cited by 2,142 · see citing works
ChatGPT: Jack of all trades, master of none
Kocoń, J., Cichecki, I., Kaszyca, O., Kochanek, M., Szydło, D., Baran, J., Bielaniewicz, J., Gruza, M., Janz, A., Kanclerz, K., et al. (2023) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101861 · Cited by 758 · see citing works
QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMs
Dettmers, T., Pagnoni, A., Holtzman, A., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.14314 · Cited by 507 · see citing works
“For the evaluation of chatbots approaches that use GPT-4 instead of costly human annotation have been developed [10, 45].”
MethodJudging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena
Zheng, L., Chiang, W.-L., Sheng, Y., Zhuang, S., Wu, Z., Zhuang, Y., Lin, Z., Li, Z., Li, D., Xing, E. P., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.05685 · Cited by 1,888 · see citing works
“This approach has been tried in our earlier blog post [8] and other concurrent or follow-up work [5, 28, 14, 12, 51, 18, 32, 39, 7, 42].”
BackgroundA Survey of GPT-3 Family Large Language Models Including ChatGPT and GPT-4
Kalyan, K. S. (2024) · Natural Language Processing Journal · doi:10.1016/j.nlp.2023.100048 · Cited by 335 · see citing works
Savage, T., Nayak, A., Gallo, R., Rangan, E., & Chen, J. H. (2024) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-024-01010-1 · Cited by 265 · see citing works
LLaVA-Med: Training a Large Language-and-Vision Assistant for Biomedicine in One Day
Li, C., Wong, C., Zhang, S., Usuyama, N., Liu, H., Yang, J., Naumann, T., Poon, H., & Gao, J. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.00890 · Cited by 590 · see citing works
“Inspired by recent work in instruction-tuning [37, 27], LLaVA-Med uses GPT-4 to generate diverse biomedical multimodal instruction-following data using image-text pairs from PMC-15M, and fine-tune a large biomedical-domain VL model [27] using a novel curriculum learning method.”
MethodSelf-citationOCRBench: on the hidden mystery of OCR in large multimodal models
Liu, Y., Li, Z., Huang, M., Yang, B., Yu, W., Li, C., Yin, X.-C., Liu, C.-L., Jin, L., & Bai, X. (2024) · Science China Information Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11432-024-4235-6 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
“Among them, LLaMA [3] is an open-source LLM that matches the performance of GPT-3, followed by Alpaca [4], Vicuna [5], GPT-4-LLM [6] to improve the LLM’s alignment ability to follow human instruction, reporting impressive performance compared with proprietary LLMs.”
Self-citationGuan, T., Liu, F., Wu, X., Xian, R., Li, Z., Liu, X., Wang, X., Chen, L., Huang, F., Yacoob, Y., et al. (2024) · 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.01363 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluators
Wang, P., Li, L., Chen, L., Cai, Z., Zhu, D., Lin, B., Cao, Y., Kong, L., Liu, Q., Liu, T., et al. (2024) · Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.511 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Preference Ranking Optimization for Human Alignment
Song, F., Yu, B., Li, M., Yu, H., Huang, F., Li, Y., & Wang, H. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.17492 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Preference Ranking Optimization for Human Alignment
Song, F., Yu, B., Li, M., Yu, H., Huang, F., Li, Y., & Wang, H. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i17.29865 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Contrasting Linguistic Patterns in Human and LLM-Generated News Text
Muñoz-Ortiz, A., Gómez-Rodríguez, C., & Vilares, D. (2024) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-024-10903-2 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Distilling large language models for matching patients to clinical trials
Nievas, M., Basu, A., Wang, Y., & Singh, H. (2024) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocae073 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
SayNav: Grounding Large Language Models for Dynamic Planning to Navigation in New Environments
Rajvanshi, A., Sikka, K., Lin, X., Lee, B., Chiu, H.-P., & Velasquez, A. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.04077 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
MultiModal-GPT: a vision and language model for dialogue with humans
Gong, T., Lyu, C., Zhang, S., Wang, Y., Zheng, M., Zhao, Q., Liu, K., Zhang, W., Luo, P., & Chen, K. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.04790 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
HalluciDoctor: Mitigating Hallucinatory Toxicity in Visual Instruction Data
Yu, Q., Li, J., Wei, L., Pang, L., Ye, W., Qin, B., Tang, S., Tian, Q., & Zhuang, Y. (2024) · 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.01230 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Zhang, Y., Pan, Y., Zhong, T., Dong, P., Xie, K., Liu, Y., Jiang, H., Wu, Z., Liu, Z., Zhao, W., et al. (2024) · Meta-Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.metrad.2024.100103 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
The False Promise of Imitating Proprietary LLMs
Gudibande, A., Wallace, E., Snell, C., Geng, X., Liu, H., Abbeel, P., Levine, S., & Song, D. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.15717 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
“…proprietary models for specific tasks (Sun et al., 2023; Hsieh et al., 2023; Honovich et al., 2022) and broadly imitate models, e.g., Alpaca (Taori et al., 2023), Vicuna (Chiang et al., 2023), Koala (Geng et al., 2023), GPT4ALL (Anand et al., 2023), and more (Wang et al., 2022a; Peng et al., 2023).”
BackgroundExploring the Capabilities of LLMs for Code-Change-Related Tasks
Fan, L., Liu, J., Liu, Z., Lo, D., Xia, X., & Li, S. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3709358 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Hallucination of Multimodal Large Language Models: A Survey
Bai, Z., Wang, P., Xiao, T., He, T., Han, Z., Zhang, Z., & Shou, M. Z. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.18930 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
AlpaPICO: Extraction of PICO frames from clinical trial documents using LLMs.
Ghosh, M., Mukherjee, S., Ganguly, A., Basuchowdhuri, P., Naskar, S. K., & Ganguly, D. (2024) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2024.04.005 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Quantifying Uncertainty in Answers from any Language Model and Enhancing their Trustworthiness
Chen, J., & Mueller, J. (2024) · Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.283 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
SALMONN: Towards Generic Hearing Abilities for Large Language Models
Tang, C., Yu, W., Sun, G., Chen, X., Tan, T., Li, W., Lu, L., Ma, Z., & Zhang, C. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.13289 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
“Meanwhile, instruction tuning (Wei et al., 2022a; Chung et al., 2022; Ouyang et al., 2022; Peng et al., 2023), where data is organised as pairs of user instruction (or prompt) and reference response, has emerged as an LLM training paradigm that allows LLMs to follow open-ended user instructions.”
BackgroundPrompt Infection: LLM-to-LLM Prompt Injection within Multi-Agent Systems
Lee, D., & Tiwari, M. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.07283 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Understanding the Effects of RLHF on LLM Generalisation and Diversity
Kirk, R., Mediratta, I., Nalmpantis, C., Luketina, J., Hambro, E., Grefenstette, E., & Raileanu, R. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.06452 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
“…tasks include translation, question-answering, and other standard NLP tasks, as well as newer tasks such as using LLMs to simulate human annotators (Dubois et al., 2023; Mao et al., 2023; Liu et al., 2023b) or as content generators for improving other models (Peng et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2023).”
MethodReWOO: Decoupling Reasoning from Observations for Efficient Augmented Language Models
Xu, B., Peng, Z., Lei, B., Mukherjee, S., Liu, Y., & Xu, D. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.18323 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
SteerLM: Attribute Conditioned SFT as an (User-Steerable) Alternative to RLHF
Dong, Y., Wang, Z., Sreedhar, M., Wu, X., & Kuchaiev, O. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023 · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.754 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
A Survey on Autonomy-Induced Security Risks in Large Model-Based Agents
Su, H., Luo, J., Liu, C., Yang, X., Zhang, Y., Dong, Y., & Zhu, J. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2026.3688650 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
SPIN: Accelerating Large Language Model Inference with Heterogeneous Speculative Models
Chen, F., Li, P., Luan, T. H., Su, Z., & Deng, J. (2025) · IEEE INFOCOM 2025 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications · doi:10.1109/infocom55648.2025.11044522 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Mitigating Sycophancy in Large Language Models via Direct Preference Optimization
Khan, A. A., Alam, S., Wang, X., Khan, A. F., Neog, D. R., & Anwar, A. (2024) · 2024 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata62323.2024.10825538 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Liu, J., Hao, W., Cheng, K., & Jin, D. (2025) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2025.110319 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
CAVEN: An Embodied Conversational Agent for Efficient Audio-Visual Navigation in Noisy Environments
Liu, X., Paul, S., Chatterjee, M., & Cherian, A. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i4.28167 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Multi-Modal generative AI systems: Bridging text, vision and speech with advanced LLM Architectures
John, D. (2023) · International Journal of Science and Research Archive · doi:10.30574/ijsra.2023.9.2.0619 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
The Good, the Bad and the Constructive: Automatically Measuring Peer Review’s Utility for Authors
Sadallah, A., Baumgärtner, T., Gurevych, I., & Briscoe, T. (2025) · Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.emnlp-main.1476 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Exploring the Capabilities of LLMs for Code Change Related Tasks
Fan, L., Liu, J., Liu, Z., Lo, D., Xia, X., & Li, S. (2024) · arXiv · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Zweiger, A., Pari, J., Guo, H., Akyürek, E., Kim, Y., & Agrawal, P. (2025) · arXiv · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“The creation of synthetic data for LLM training is increasingly common, from large-scale pretraining datasets [15, 16, 17, 18, 19] to task-specific data augmentation [20, 21, 22] and instruction-tuning sets [23, 24].”
- Authors
- Peng, B., Li, C., He, P., Galley, M., & Gao, J.
- Affiliations
- Microsoft (United States) (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2304.03277
- OpenAlex
- W4362707064
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 76 · 2023: 69
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Keywords
- instruction tuning, GPT-4, large language models, synthetic data generation, zero-shot learning, llamas, feedback data
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
