PreprintCited by 590Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationBiomedical Text Mining and Ontologies

LLaVA-Med: Training a Large Language-and-Vision Assistant for Biomedicine in One Day

Open access
Li, Chunyuan, Wong, Cliff, Zhang, Sheng, Usuyama, Naoto, Liu, Haotian, Yang, Jianwei, Naumann, Tristan, Poon, Hoifung +1 more·2023·arXiv

Abstract

Conversational generative AI has demonstrated remarkable promise for empowering biomedical practitioners, but current investigations focus on unimodal text. Multimodal conversational AI has seen rapid progress by leveraging billions of image-text pairs from the public web, but such general-domain vision-language models still lack sophistication in understanding and conversing about biomedical images. In this paper, we propose a cost-efficient approach for training a vision-language conversational assistant that can answer open-ended research questions of biomedical images. The key idea is to leverage a large-scale, broad-coverage biomedical figure-caption dataset extracted from PubMed Central, use GPT-4 to self-instruct open-ended instruction-following data from the captions, and then fine-tune a large general-domain vision-language model using a novel curriculum learning method. Specifically, the model first learns to align biomedical vocabulary using the figure-caption pairs as is, then learns to master open-ended conversational semantics using GPT-4 generated instruction-following data, broadly mimicking how a layperson gradually acquires biomedical knowledge. This enables us to train a Large Language and Vision Assistant for BioMedicine (LLaVA-Med) in less than 15 hours (with eight A100s). LLaVA-Med exhibits excellent multimodal conversational capability and can follow open-ended instruction to assist with inquiries about a biomedical image. On three standard biomedical visual question answering datasets, LLaVA-Med outperforms previous supervised state-of-the-art on certain metrics. To facilitate biomedical multimodal research, we will release our instruction-following data and the LLaVA-Med model.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2306.00890

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing multimodal medical data sets available for public use are often relatively small in scale and demand the consolidation of numerous resources.

    “Existing multimodal medical data sets available for public use [84,85,148] are often relatively small in scale and demand the consolidation of numerous resources.”

    From Multimodal Large Language Models in Health Care: Applications, Challenges, and Future Outlook. (2024) · cites this paper as [84]

    The Introduction describes PMC-15M as two orders of magnitude larger than the next-largest public biomedical image-text dataset, and Section 5.2 gives examples of smaller medical visual-question-answering datasets. These passages support the point that many existing datasets were relatively small, but the paper does not say that using them demands consolidating numerous resources. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • PMC-VQA and LLaVA-Med include text and image modalities for medical visual question answering.

    “Similarly, PMC-VQA [85] and LLaVA-Med [84] include text and image modalities for medical visual question answering.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Sheng Zhang, Yanbo Xu, Naoto Usuyama, Jaspreet Bagga, Robert Tinn, Sam Preston, Rajesh Rao, Mu Wei, Naveen Valluri, Cliff Wong, et al. Large-scale domain-specific pretraining for biomedical vision-language processing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.00915, 2023. 2, 3, 6, 9 · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, C., Wong, C., Zhang, S., Usuyama, N., Liu, H., Yang, J., Naumann, T., Poon, H., & Gao, J.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2023
Pages
28541-28564
ISSN
1049-5258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7133197087
Cited by
590
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 288 · 2025: 179 · 2024: 115 · 2023: 8
FWCI
63.10
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • neural information processing systems (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Keywords
multimodal language models, medical question answering, biomedicine, vision-language models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review