PreprintCited by 66Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationImage Retrieval and Classification Techniques

PMC-VQA: Visual Instruction Tuning for Medical Visual Question Answering

Open access
Zhang, Xiaoman, Wu, Chaoyi, Zhao, Ziheng, Lin, Weixiong, Zhang, Ya, Wang, Yanfeng, Xie, Weidi·2023·arXiv

Abstract

Medical Visual Question Answering (MedVQA) presents a significant opportunity to enhance diagnostic accuracy and healthcare delivery by leveraging artificial intelligence to interpret and answer questions based on medical images. In this study, we reframe the problem of MedVQA as a generation task that naturally follows the human-machine interaction and propose a generative-based model for medical visual understanding by aligning visual information from a pre-trained vision encoder with a large language model. We establish a scalable pipeline to construct a large-scale medical visual question-answering dataset, named PMC-VQA, which contains 227k VQA pairs of 149k images that cover various modalities or diseases. We train the proposed model on PMC-VQA and then fine-tune it on multiple public benchmarks, e.g., VQA-RAD, SLAKE, and Image-Clef-2019, significantly outperforming existing MedVQA models in generating relevant, accurate free-form answers. In addition, we propose a test set that has undergone manual verification, which is significantly more challenging, serving to better monitor the development of generative MedVQA methods. To facilitate comprehensive evaluation and comparison, we have maintained a leaderboard at https://paperswithcode.com/paper/pmc-vqa-visual-instruction-tuning-for-medical, offering a centralized resource for tracking progress and benchmarking state-of-the-art approaches. The PMC-VQA dataset emerges as a vital resource for the field of research, and the MedVInT presents a significant breakthrough in the area of MedVQA.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2305.10415

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing multimodal medical data sets available for public use are often relatively small in scale and demand the consolidation of numerous resources.

    “Existing multimodal medical data sets available for public use [84,85,148] are often relatively small in scale and demand the consolidation of numerous resources.”

    From Multimodal Large Language Models in Health Care: Applications, Challenges, and Future Outlook. (2024) · cites this paper as [85]

    Section 4.1 identifies a lack of large-scale, multimodal medical VQA datasets, and Section 4.3.1 gives the relatively small sizes of three public benchmarks. The paper does not say that using these datasets demands consolidating numerous resources. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • PMC-VQA and LLaVA-Med include text and image modalities for medical visual question answering.

    “Similarly, PMC-VQA [85] and LLaVA-Med [84] include text and image modalities for medical visual question answering.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Jean-Baptiste Alayrac, Jeff Donahue, Pauline Luc, Antoine Miech, Iain Barr, Yana Hasson, Karel Lenc, Arthur Mensch, Katie Millican, Malcolm Reynolds, Roman Ring, Eliza Rutherford, Serkan Cabi, Tengda Han, Zhitao Gong, Sina Samangooei, Marianne Monteiro, Jacob Menick, Sebastian Borgeaud, Andy Brock, Aida Nematzadeh, Sahand Sharifzadeh, Mikolaj Binkowski, Ricardo Barreira, Oriol Vinyals, Andrew Zisserman, and Karen Simonyan. Flamingo: a visual language model for few-shot learning. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2022.
  2. Asma Ben Abacha, Sadid A Hasan, Vivek V Datla, Dina Demner-Fushman, and Henning Müller. Vqa- med: Overview of the medical visual question answering task at imageclef 2019. In Proceedings of CLEF (Conference and Labs of the Evaluation Forum) 2019 Working Notes. 9-12 September 2019, 2019.
  3. Asma Ben Abacha, Mourad Sarrouti, Dina Demner-Fushman, Sadid A Hasan, and Henning Müller. Overview of the vqa-med task at imageclef 2021: Visual question answering and generation in the medical domain. In Proceedings of the CLEF 2021 Conference and Labs of the Evaluation Forum-working notes. 21-24 September 2021, 2021.
  4. Xiaolan Chen, Pusheng Xu, Yao Li, Weiyi Zhang, Fan Song, Ying-Feng Zheng, Danli Shi, and Mingguang He. Chatffa: Interactive visual question answering on fundus fluorescein angiography image using chatgpt. Available at SSRN 4578568.
  5. Jianwei Feng and Dong Huang. Optimal gradient checkpoint search for arbitrary computation graphs. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 11433-11442, 2021.
  6. Kristopher N Jones, Dwain E Woode, Kristina Panizzi, and Peter G Anderson. Peir digital library: Online resources and authoring system. In Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium, page 1075. American Medical Informatics Association, 2001.
  7. Jason J Lau, Soumya Gayen, Asma Ben Abacha, and Dina Demner-Fushman. A dataset of clinically generated visual questions and answers about radiology images. Scientific data, 5(1):1-10, 2018.
  8. Aaron Nicolson, Jason Dowling, and Bevan Koopman. A concise model for medical image captioning. In CLEF (Working Notes), pages 1611-1619, 2023.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, X., Wu, C., Zhao, Z., Lin, W., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., & Xie, W.
Affiliations
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2023
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4377121462
Cited by
66
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 8
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
Keywords
medical visual question answering, visual instruction tuning, generative question answering, medical image interpretation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review