PreprintCited by 66Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationMultimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsTopic Modeling

Radiology-GPT: A Large Language Model for Radiology

Open access
Liu, Zhengliang, Zhong, Aoxiao, Li, Yiwei, Yang, Longtao, Ju, Chao, Wu, Zihao, Ma, Chong, Shu, Peng +12 more·2023·arXiv

Abstract

We introduce Radiology-GPT, a large language model for radiology. Using an instruction tuning approach on an extensive dataset of radiology domain knowledge, Radiology-GPT demonstrates superior performance compared to general language models such as StableLM, Dolly and LLaMA. It exhibits significant versatility in radiological diagnosis, research, and communication. This work serves as a catalyst for future developments in clinical NLP. The successful implementation of Radiology-GPT is indicative of the potential of localizing generative large language models, specifically tailored for distinctive medical specialties, while ensuring adherence to privacy standards such as HIPAA. The prospect of developing individualized, large-scale language models that cater to specific needs of various hospitals presents a promising direction. The fusion of conversational competence and domain-specific knowledge in these models is set to foster future development in healthcare AI. A demo of Radiology-GPT is available at https://huggingface.co/spaces/allen-eric/radiology-gpt.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2306.08666

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In medicine, most previous works empower LLM-based agents with external knowledge in their memory.

    “In the field of medicine, most of the previous works empower LLM-based agents with external knowledge in their memory [107, 129, 132, 151, 115].”

    From A Survey on the Memory Mechanism of Large Language Model-based Agents (2025) · cites this paper as [132]

    The Related Work section (§2.2, p. 3) describes domain-specific models trained or fine-tuned on specialized text, and the Discussion (§5.3) proposes a future panel of medical LLMs. Neither passage says that most previous medical LLM-based agents use external knowledge in memory. Searches for that phrase and for retrieval or external-knowledge mechanisms did not find support in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.70)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [1][1] Yiheng Liu, Tianle Han, Siyuan Ma, Jiayue Zhang, Yuanyuan Yang, Jiaming Tian, Hao He, Antong Li, Mengshen He, Zhengliang Liu, et al. Summary of chatgpt/gpt-4 research and perspective towards the future of large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.01852, 2023. · arXiv
  2. [2][2] R OpenAI. Gpt-4 technical report. arXiv, 2023.
  3. [6][6] Haixing Dai, Zhengliang Liu, Wenxiong Liao, Xiaoke Huang, Zihao Wu, Lin Zhao, Wei Liu, Ninghao Liu, Sheng Li, Dajiang Zhu, et al. Chataug: Leveraging chatgpt for text data augmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13007, 2023. · arXiv
  4. [10][10] Rohan Anil, Andrew M Dai, Orhan Firat, Melvin Johnson, Dmitry Lepikhin, Alexandre Passos, Siamak Shakeri, Emanuel Taropa, Paige Bailey, Zhifeng Chen, et al. Palm 2 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.10403, 2023. 13 · arXiv
  5. [22][22] Alec Radford, Jeffrey Wu, Rewon Child, David Luan, Dario Amodei, Ilya Sutskever, et al. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI blog, 1(8):9, 2019.
  6. [47][47] Wenxiong Liao, Zhengliang Liu, Haixing Dai, Shaochen Xu, Zihao Wu, Yiyang Zhang, Xiaoke Huang, Dajiang Zhu, Hongmin Cai, Tianming Liu, et al. Differentiate chatgpt-generated and human-written medical texts. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.11567, 2023. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, Z., Zhong, A., Li, Y., Yang, L., Ju, C., Wu, Z., Ma, C., Shu, P., Chen, C., Kim, S., Dai, H., Zhao, L., Sun, L., Zhu, D., Liu, J., Liu, W., Shen, D., Li, X., Li, Q., & Liu, T.
Affiliations
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University (CN)
  • University of Georgia (US)
  • Northwestern Polytechnical University (CN)
  • Lehigh University (US)
  • The University of Texas at Arlington (US)
  • ShanghaiTech University (CN)
Corresponding author
Li, Xiang
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2023
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
100153-100153
ISSN
2950-1628 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4410430985
Cited by
59
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9
FWCI
9.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Meta-Radiology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
Keywords
large language models, radiology, instruction tuning, radiographic diagnosis, clinical natural language processing, domain-specific language models, HIPAA compliance, artificial intelligence in healthcare, conversational AI

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review