PreprintCited by 22Speech and dialogue systemsArtificial Intelligence ApplicationsUsability and User Interface Design

AppAgent: Multimodal Agents as Smartphone Users

Open access
Zhang, Chi, Yang, Zhao, Liu, Jiaxuan, Li, Yanda, Han, Yucheng, Chen, Xin, Huang, Zebiao, Fu, Bin +1 more·2023·arXiv

Abstract

Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have led to the creation of intelligent agents capable of performing complex tasks. This paper introduces a novel LLM-based multimodal agent framework designed to operate smartphone applications. Our framework enables the agent to operate smartphone applications through a simplified action space, mimicking human-like interactions such as tapping and swiping. This novel approach bypasses the need for system back-end access, thereby broadening its applicability across diverse apps. Central to our agent's functionality is its innovative learning method. The agent learns to navigate and use new apps either through autonomous exploration or by observing human demonstrations. This process generates a knowledge base that the agent refers to for executing complex tasks across different applications. To demonstrate the practicality of our agent, we conducted extensive testing over 50 tasks in 10 different applications, including social media, email, maps, shopping, and sophisticated image editing tools. The results affirm our agent's proficiency in handling a diverse array of high-level tasks.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2312.13771

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multimodal GenAI agents can operate smartphone applications, generating digital trace data while executing user requests.

    “Preliminary work on multimodal GenAI agents [95] (preprint) has shown these agents can operate smartphone applications, generating digital trace data while executing user requests.”
  • The full capabilities of LLMs as comprehensive autonomous trading systems remain underexplored, particularly in their ability to interpret multimodal data and utilize diverse tools.

    “Although FinMEM [56] is an LLM trading agent with a humanaligned memory mechanism and character design, the full capabilities of LLMs as comprehensive autonomous trading systems remain underexplored, particularly in their ability to interpret multimodal data and utilize diverse tools.”

    From A Multimodal Foundation Agent for Financial Trading: Tool-Augmented, Diversified, and Generalist (2024) · cites this paper as [56]

    The Introduction and §2.2 discuss multimodal LLM agents, visual interpretation, and tool use in smartphone and other non-trading tasks. Our copy does not address whether comprehensive autonomous trading systems remain underexplored; searches for trading, financial markets, and that specific research gap found no relevant passage. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • FinMEM is an LLM trading agent with a human-aligned memory mechanism and character design.

    “Although FinMEM [56] is an LLM trading agent with a humanaligned memory mechanism and character design, the full capabilities of LLMs as comprehensive autonomous trading systems remain underexplored, particularly in their ability to interpret multimodal data and utilize diverse tools.”

    From A Multimodal Foundation Agent for Financial Trading: Tool-Augmented, Diversified, and Generalist (2024) · cites this paper as [56]

    Section 2.2 discusses LLM agents generally, while Section 3.2 describes an agent that operates smartphone apps. Searches for FinMEM, trading, and the claimed memory mechanism and character design found no passage addressing the claim in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

11 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [17]17. Yongliang Shen, Kaitao Song, Xu Tan, Dongsheng Li, Weiming Lu, and Yueting Zhuang. 2023. Hugging- gpt: Solving ai tasks with chatgpt and its friends in huggingface. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.
  2. [29]29. Zhengyuan Yang, Linjie Li, Kevin Lin, Jianfeng Wang, Chung-Ching Lin, Zicheng Liu, and Lijuan Wang. 2023c. The dawn of lmms: Preliminary explo- rations with gpt-4v(ision). arXiv preprint arXiv: 2309.17421. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, C., Yang, Z., Liu, J., Li, Y., Han, Y., Chen, X., Huang, Z., Fu, B., & Yu, G.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2023
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4390136788
Cited by
11
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
Keywords
multimodal agents, LLM agents, human demonstration learning, knowledge base, image editing, social media applications, shopping apps

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review