Benchmarking Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Medicine
Open accessAbstract
While large language models (LLMs) have achieved state-of-the-art performance on a wide range of medical question answering (QA) tasks, they still face challenges with hallucinations and outdated knowledge. Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is a promising solution and has been widely adopted. However, a RAG system can involve multiple flexible components, and there is a lack of best practices regarding the optimal RAG setting for various medical purposes. To systematically evaluate such systems, we propose the Medical Information Retrieval-Augmented Generation Evaluation (MIRAGE), a first-of-its-kind benchmark including 7,663 questions from five medical QA datasets. Using MIRAGE, we conducted large-scale experiments with over 1.8 trillion prompt tokens on 41 combinations of different corpora, retrievers, and backbone LLMs through the MedRAG toolkit introduced in this work. Overall, MedRAG improves the accuracy of six different LLMs by up to 18% over chain-of-thought prompting, elevating the performance of GPT-3.5 and Mixtral to GPT-4-level. Our results show that the combination of various medical corpora and retrievers achieves the best performance. In addition, we discovered a log-linear scaling property and the "lost-in-the-middle" effects in medical RAG. We believe our comprehensive evaluations can serve as practical guidelines for implementing RAG systems for medicine.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Xiong et al. demonstrated that domain-specific models can enhance retrieval performance.
“Xiong et al.37 demonstrated that domain-specific models can enhance retrieval performance.”
From Development and validation of an autonomous artificial intelligence agent for clinical decision-making in oncology (2025) · cites this paper as [37]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models
Touvron, H., Lavril, T., Izacard, G., Martinet, X., Lachaux, M.-A., Lacroix, T., Rozière, B., Goyal, N., Hambro, E., Azhar, F., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.13971 · Cited by 4,602 · see citing works
Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models
Touvron, H., Martin, L., Stone, K., Albert, P., Almahairi, A., Babaei, Y., Bashlykov, N., Batra, S., Bhargava, P., Bhosale, S., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2307.09288 · Cited by 2,604 · see citing works
Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contexts
Liu, N. F., Lin, K., Hewitt, J., Paranjape, A., Bevilacqua, M., Petroni, F., & Liang, P. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2307.03172 · Cited by 1,599 · see citing works
Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey
Gao, Y., Xiong, Y., Gao, X., Jia, K., Pan, J., Bi, Y., Dai, Y., Sun, J., Wang, M., & Wang, H. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.10997 · Cited by 876 · see citing works
Anil, R., Dai, A. M., Firat, O., Johnson, M., Lepikhin, D., Passos, A., Shakeri, S., Taropa, E., Bailey, P., Chen, Z., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.10403 · Cited by 834 · see citing works
Galactica: A Large Language Model for Science
Taylor, R., Kardas, M., Cucurull, G., Scialom, T., Hartshorn, A., Saravia, E., Poulton, A., Kerkez, V., & Stojnic, R. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2211.09085 · Cited by 605 · see citing works
Capabilities of GPT-4 on Medical Challenge Problems
Nori, H., King, N., McKinney, S. M., Carignan, D., & Horvitz, E. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.13375 · Cited by 509 · see citing works
Can large language models reason about medical questions?
Liévin, V., Hother, C. E., Motzfeldt, A. G., & Winther, O. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2207.08143 · Cited by 343 · see citing works
Towards Expert-Level Medical Question Answering with Large Language Models
Singhal, K., Tu, T., Gottweis, J., Sayres, R., Wulczyn, E., Hou, L., Clark, K., Pfohl, S., Cole-Lewis, H., Neal, D., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.09617 · Cited by 338 · see citing works
Chen, Q., Hu, Y., Peng, X., Xie, Q., Jin, Q., Gilson, A., Singer, M. B., Ai, X., Lai, P.-T., Wang, Z., et al. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-56989-2 · Cited by 219 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Neverthe-less, current systematic evaluations in biomedicine typically focus on the vanilla LLMs without RAG (Chen et al., 2023a; Nori et al., 2023a).”
BackgroundSelf-citationCan Generalist Foundation Models Outcompete Special-Purpose Tuning? Case Study in Medicine
Nori, H., Lee, Y. T., Zhang, S., Carignan, D., Edgar, R., Fusi, N., King, N., Larson, J., Li, Y., Liu, W., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.16452 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Augmented Language Models: a Survey
Mialon, G., Dessì, R., Lomeli, M., Nalmpantis, C., Pasunuru, R., Raileanu, R., Rozière, B., Schick, T., Dwivedi-Yu, J., Celikyilmaz, A., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.07842 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Jiang, A. Q., Sablayrolles, A., Roux, A., Mensch, A., Savary, B., Bamford, C., Chaplot, D. S., Casas, D. D. L., Hanna, E. B., Bressand, F., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2401.04088 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
MEDITRON-70B: Scaling Medical Pretraining for Large Language Models
Chen, Z., Cano, A. H., Romanou, A., Bonnet, A., Matoba, K., Salvi, F., Pagliardini, M., Fan, S., Köpf, A., Mohtashami, A., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.16079 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Yang, X., Chen, A., PourNejatian, N., Shin, H. C., Smith, K. E., Parisien, C., Compas, C. B., Martin, C. E., Flores, M. G., Zhang, Y., et al. (2022) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.03540 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
PaperQA: Retrieval-Augmented Generative Agent for Scientific Research
Lála, J., O'Donoghue, O., Shtedritski, A., Cox, S., Rodriques, S. G., & White, A. D. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.07559 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Active Retrieval Augmented Generation
Jiang, Z., Xu, F. F., Gao, L., Sun, Z., Liu, Q., Dwivedi-Yu, J., Yang, Y., Callan, J., & Neubig, G. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.06983 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
In-Context Retrieval-Augmented Language ModelsPreprint
Ram, O., Levine, Y., Dalmedigos, I., et al. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.00083 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Jeong, M., Sohn, J., Sung, M., et al. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2401.15269 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 42
- Asma Ben Abacha, Chaitanya Shivade, and Dina Demner-Fushman. 2019. Overview of the mediqa 2019 shared task on textual inference, question en- tailment and question answering. In Proceedings of the 18th BioNLP Workshop and Shared Task, pages 370-379.
- Waleed Ammar, Dirk Groeneveld, Chandra Bhagavat- ula, Iz Beltagy, Miles Crawford, Doug Downey, Ja- son Dunkelberger, Ahmed Elgohary, Sergey Feld- man, Vu Ha, et al. 2018. Construction of the liter- ature graph in semantic scholar. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chap- ter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 3 (Industry Papers), pages 84-91.
- Sofia J Athenikos and Hyoil Han. 2010. Biomedical question answering: A survey. Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 99(1):1-24.
- Asma Ben Abacha and Dina Demner-Fushman. 2019. A question-entailment approach to question answering. BMC bioinformatics, 20(1):1-23.
- Sebastian Borgeaud, Arthur Mensch, Jordan Hoff- mann, Trevor Cai, Eliza Rutherford, Katie Milli- can, George Bm Van Den Driessche, Jean-Baptiste Lespiau, Bogdan Damoc, Aidan Clark, et al. 2022. Improving language models by retrieving from tril- lions of tokens. In International conference on ma- chine learning, pages 2206-2240. PMLR.
- Qingyu Chen, Jingcheng Du, Yan Hu, Vipina Kuttichi Keloth, Xueqing Peng, Kalpana Raja, Rui Zhang, Zhiyong Lu, and Hua Xu. 2023a. Large language models in biomedical natural language processing: benchmarks, baselines, and recommendations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.16326. · arXiv
- Arman Cohan, Sergey Feldman, Iz Beltagy, Doug Downey, and Daniel S Weld. 2020. Specter: Document-level representation learning using citation-informed transformers. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 2270-2282.
- Gordon V Cormack, Charles LA Clarke, and Stefan Buettcher. 2009. Reciprocal rank fusion outperforms condorcet and individual rank learning methods. In Proceedings of the 32nd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in informa- tion retrieval, pages 758-759.
- Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2019. BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language under- standing. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Tech- nologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), pages 4171-4186, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Nicolas Fiorini, Robert Leaman, David J Lipman, and Zhiyong Lu. 2018. How user intelligence is improv- ing pubmed. Nature biotechnology, 36(10):937-945.
- Giacomo Frisoni, Miki Mizutani, Gianluca Moro, and Lorenzo Valgimigli. 2022. Bioreader: a retrieval- enhanced text-to-text transformer for biomedical lit- erature. In Proceedings of the 2022 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing, pages 5770-5793.
- Yu Gu, Robert Tinn, Hao Cheng, Michael Lucas, Naoto Usuyama, Xiaodong Liu, Tristan Naumann, Jianfeng Gao, and Hoifung Poon. 2021. Domain-specific lan- guage model pretraining for biomedical natural lan- guage processing. ACM Transactions on Computing for Healthcare (HEALTH), 3(1):1-23.
- Dan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou, Mantas Mazeika, Dawn Song, and Jacob Steinhardt. 2020. Measuring massive multitask language under- standing. In International Conference on Learning Representations.
- William Hersh. 2024. Search still matters: informa- tion retrieval in the era of generative ai. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, page ocae014.
- Gautier Izacard, Mathilde Caron, Lucas Hosseini, Sebas- tian Riedel, Piotr Bojanowski, Armand Joulin, and Edouard Grave. 2022. Unsupervised dense informa- tion retrieval with contrastive learning. Transactions on Machine Learning Research.
- Ziwei Ji, Nayeon Lee, Rita Frieske, Tiezheng Yu, Dan Su, Yan Xu, Etsuko Ishii, Ye Jin Bang, Andrea Madotto, and Pascale Fung. 2023. Survey of halluci- nation in natural language generation. ACM Comput- ing Surveys, 55(12):1-38.
- Di Jin, Eileen Pan, Nassim Oufattole, Wei-Hung Weng, Hanyi Fang, and Peter Szolovits. 2021. What disease does this patient have? a large-scale open domain question answering dataset from medical exams. Ap- plied Sciences, 11(14):6421.
- Qiao Jin, Bhuwan Dhingra, Zhengping Liu, William Cohen, and Xinghua Lu. 2019. Pubmedqa: A dataset for biomedical research question answering. In Pro- ceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Meth- ods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th In- ternational Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), pages 2567-2577.
- Qiao Jin, Robert Leaman, and Zhiyong Lu. 2023b. Re- trieve, summarize, and verify: How will chatgpt im- pact information seeking from the medical literature? Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, pages 10-1681.
- Qiao Jin, Zheng Yuan, Guangzhi Xiong, Qianlan Yu, Huaiyuan Ying, Chuanqi Tan, Mosha Chen, Song- fang Huang, Xiaozhong Liu, and Sheng Yu. 2022. Biomedical question answering: a survey of ap- proaches and challenges. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 55(2):1-36.
- Vladimir Karpukhin, Barlas Oguz, Sewon Min, Patrick Lewis, Ledell Wu, Sergey Edunov, Danqi Chen, and Wen-tau Yih. 2020. Dense passage retrieval for open- domain question answering. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 6769-6781.
- Anastasia Krithara, Anastasios Nentidis, Konstantinos Bougiatiotis, and Georgios Paliouras. 2023. Bioasq- qa: A manually curated corpus for biomedical ques- tion answering. Scientific Data, 10(1):170.
- Jinhyuk Lee, Wonjin Yoon, Sungdong Kim, Donghyeon Kim, Sunkyu Kim, Chan Ho So, and Jaewoo Kang. 2020. Biobert: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining. Bioinformatics, 36(4):1234-1240.
- Jimmy Lin, Xueguang Ma, Sheng-Chieh Lin, Jheng- Hong Yang, Ronak Pradeep, and Rodrigo Nogueira. 2021. Pyserini: A python toolkit for reproducible information retrieval research with sparse and dense representations. In Proceedings of the 44th Inter- national ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 2356- 2362.
- Aakanksha Naik, Sravanthi Parasa, Sergey Feldman, Lucy Wang, and Tom Hope. 2022. Literature- augmented clinical outcome prediction. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL 2022, pages 438-453.
- Malte Ostendorff, Nils Rethmeier, Isabelle Augenstein, Bela Gipp, and Georg Rehm. 2022. Neighborhood contrastive learning for scientific document represen- tations with citation embeddings. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natu- ral Language Processing, pages 11670-11688.
- Ankit Pal, Logesh Kumar Umapathi, and Malaikan- nan Sankarasubbu. 2022. Medmcqa: A large-scale multi-subject multi-choice dataset for medical do- main question answering. In Conference on Health, Inference, and Learning, pages 248-260.
- PMLR.
- François Remy, Kris Demuynck, and Thomas De- meester. 2022. Biolord: Learning ontological repre- sentations from definitions for biomedical concepts and their textual descriptions. In Findings of the As- sociation for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2022, pages 1454-1465.
- Stephen Robertson, Hugo Zaragoza, et al. 2009. The probabilistic relevance framework: Bm25 and be- yond. Foundations and Trends® in Information Re- trieval, 3(4):333-389.
- Karan Singhal, Shekoofeh Azizi, Tao Tu, S Sara Mah- davi, Jason Wei, Hyung Won Chung, Nathan Scales, Ajay Tanwani, Heather Cole-Lewis, Stephen Pfohl, et al. 2023a. Large language models encode clinical knowledge. Nature, 620(7972):172-180.
- Sarvesh Soni and Kirk Roberts. 2020. Evaluation of dataset selection for pre-training and fine-tuning transformer language models for clinical question answering. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, pages 5532- 5538.
- Nandan Thakur, Nils Reimers, Andreas Rücklé, Ab- hishek Srivastava, and Iryna Gurevych. 2021. BEIR: A heterogeneous benchmark for zero-shot evaluation of information retrieval models. In Thirty-fifth Con- ference on Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks Track (Round 2).
- Daniel Truhn, Jorge S Reis-Filho, and Jakob Nikolas Kather. 2023. Large language models should be used as scientific reasoning engines, not knowledge databases. Nature medicine, 29(12):2983-2984.
- George Tsatsaronis, Georgios Balikas, Prodromos Malakasiotis, Ioannis Partalas, Matthias Zschunke, Michael R Alvers, Dirk Weissenborn, Anastasia Krithara, Sergios Petridis, Dimitris Polychronopou- los, et al. 2015. An overview of the bioasq large-scale biomedical semantic indexing and question answer- ing competition. BMC bioinformatics, 16(1):1-28.
- David Wadden, Shanchuan Lin, Kyle Lo, Lucy Lu Wang, Madeleine van Zuylen, Arman Cohan, and Hannaneh Hajishirzi. 2020. Fact or fiction: Verifying scientific claims. In Proceedings of the 2020 Con- ference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 7534-7550.
- Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma, Fei Xia, Ed Chi, Quoc V Le, Denny Zhou, et al. 2022. Chain-of-thought prompting elicits rea- soning in large language models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:24824-24837.
- Guillaume Wenzek, Marie-Anne Lachaux, Alexis Con- neau, Vishrav Chaudhary, Francisco Guzmán, Ar- mand Joulin, and Édouard Grave. 2020. Ccnet: Ex- tracting high quality monolingual datasets from web crawl data. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, pages 4003- 4012.
- Chaoyi Wu, Xiaoman Zhang, Ya Zhang, Yanfeng Wang, and Weidi Xie. 2023. Pmc-llama: Further fine- tuning llama on medical papers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.14454. · arXiv
- Lee Xiong, Chenyan Xiong, Ye Li, Kwok-Fung Tang, Jialin Liu, Paul N Bennett, Junaid Ahmed, and Arnold Overwijk. 2020. Approximate nearest neigh- bor negative contrastive learning for dense text re- trieval. In International Conference on Learning Representations.
- Michihiro Yasunaga, Antoine Bosselut, Hongyu Ren, Xikun Zhang, Christopher D Manning, Percy S Liang, and Jure Leskovec. 2022. Deep bidirectional language-knowledge graph pretraining. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:37309- 37323.
- Pierre Zweigenbaum. 2003. Question answering in biomedicine. In Proceedings Workshop on Natural Language Processing for Question Answering, EACL, volume 2005, pages 1-4. Citeseer.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Current applications and challenges in large language models for patient care: a systematic review
Busch, F., Hoffmann, L., Rueger, C., van Dijk, E. H., Kader, R., Ortiz-Prado, E., Makowski, M. R., Saba, L., Hadamitzky, M., Kather, J. N., et al. (2025) · Communications Medicine · doi:10.1038/s43856-024-00717-2 · Cited by 358 · see citing works
Ferber, D., El Nahhas, O. S. M., Wölflein, G., Wiest, I. C., Clusmann, J., Leßmann, M.-E., Foersch, S., Lammert, J., Tschochohei, M., Jäger, D., et al. (2025) · Nature Cancer · doi:10.1038/s43018-025-00991-6 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Busch, F., Kaibel, L., Nguyen, H., Lemke, T., Ziegelmayer, S., Graf, M., Marka, A. W., Endrös, L., Prucker, P., Spitzl, D., et al. (2025) · Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10278-025-01483-w · Cited by 10 · see citing works
README: Bridging Medical Jargon and Lay Understanding for Patient Education through Data-Centric NLP
Yao, Z., Kantu, N. S., Wei, G., Tran, H., Duan, Z., Kwon, S., Yang, Z., & Yu, H. (2024) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2024 · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.findings-emnlp.737 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Enhancing Medical Question Answering with LLMs via a Hybrid Retrieval-Augmented Generation Framework
Aljohani, B., & Alsanoosy, T. (2026) · Information · doi:10.3390/info17020133 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Huang, H., DeLucia, A., Tiyyala, V. M., & Dredze, M. (2026) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2026 · doi:10.18653/v1/2026.findings-acl.693 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“The filtering aims to address redundant and hallucinated claims. is often not the case with FActScore in the medical domain.”
Deceptive Grounding: Entity Attribution Failure in Clinical Retrieval-Augmented Generation
Caruzzo, C., Yoo, D., & Kim, T. S. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.09349
“Safety evaluations for clinical LLMs focus on factual accuracy, hallucination rates, and appropriate uncertainty [Singhal et al., 2023, Nori et al., 2023, Zakka et al., 2024, Xiong et al., 2024].”
SEMA-RAG: A Self-Evolving Multi-Agent Retrieval-Augmented Generation Framework for Medical Reasoning
Huang, Y., Chen, R., & Cheng, J. (2026) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2026 · doi:10.18653/v1/2026.findings-acl.917
“…and generalisation capabilities across diverse medical question-answering scenarios, we select five widely used datasets from the MIRAGE benchmark (Xiong et al., 2024): three medical examination datasets (MMLU-Med (Hendrycks et al., 2021), MedQA-US (Jin et al., 2020), MedMCQA (Pal et al., 2022))…”
Influential
- Authors
- Xiong, G., Jin, Q., Lu, Z., & Zhang, A.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- Pages
- 6233-6251
- arXiv
- 2402.13178
- OpenAlex
- W4402670290
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 144 · 2025: 144 · 2024: 24
- FWCI
- 91.36
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (2333740)
- National Institutes of Health (1R01LM014012)
- U.S. National Library of Medicine
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Keywords
- retrieval-augmented generation, medical question answering, benchmark, hallucinations, large language models, medical corpora, Retriever, chain-of-thought prompting
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
