PreprintCited by 4Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringEmotion and Mood RecognitionHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

PhysFlow: Skin tone transfer for remote heart rate estimation through conditional normalizing flows

Open access
Comas, Joaquim, Alomar, Antonia, Ruiz, Adria, Sukno, Federico·2024·arXiv

Abstract

In recent years, deep learning methods have shown impressive results for camera-based remote physiological signal estimation, clearly surpassing traditional methods. However, the performance and generalization ability of Deep Neural Networks heavily depends on rich training data truly representing different factors of variation encountered in real applications. Unfortunately, many current remote photoplethysmography (rPPG) datasets lack diversity, particularly in darker skin tones, leading to biased performance of existing rPPG approaches. To mitigate this bias, we introduce PhysFlow, a novel method for augmenting skin diversity in remote heart rate estimation using conditional normalizing flows. PhysFlow adopts end-to-end training optimization, enabling simultaneous training of supervised rPPG approaches on both original and generated data. Additionally, we condition our model using CIELAB color space skin features directly extracted from the facial videos without the need for skin-tone labels. We validate PhysFlow on publicly available datasets, UCLA-rPPG and MMPD, demonstrating reduced heart rate error, particularly in dark skin tones. Furthermore, we demonstrate its versatility and adaptability across different data-driven rPPG methods.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2407.21519

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • People with darker skin tones might experience poorer heart rate measurement accuracy because of their skin tones potentially skewing data used to develop research findings and clinical recommendations.

    “People with darker skin tones might experience poorer heart rate measurement accuracy because of their skin tones potentially skewing data used to develop research findings and clinical recommendations [33].”

    From Photoplethysmography in Diverse Skin Tones: Evaluating Bias in Smartwatch Health Monitoring (2025) · cites this paper as [33]

    The Introduction (p. 1) links demographic bias in remote heart-rate datasets to poorer performance for darker skin tones. Section 4.2 also reports declining estimation performance with darker skin tones. The paper does not say that skin tones skew data used to develop research findings or clinical recommendations. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 65 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Rameen Abdal, Peihao Zhu, Niloy J Mitra, and Peter Wonka. Styleflow: Attribute- conditioned exploration of stylegan-generated images using conditional continuous normalizing flows. ACM Transactions on Graphics (ToG), 40(3):1-21, 2021.
  2. Bennett A Fallow, Takashi Tarumi, and Hirofumi Tanaka. Influence of skin type and wavelength on light wave reflectance. Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 27:313-317, 2013.
  3. Will Grathwohl, Ricky T. Q. Chen, Jesse Bettencourt, and David Duve- naud. Scalable reversible generative models with free-form continuous dynam- ics. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2019. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=rJxgknCcK7.
  4. Magdalena Lewandowska, Jacek Rumiński, Tomasz Kocejko, and Jedrzej Nowak. Measuring pulse rate with a webcam-a non-contact method for evaluating cardiac activity. In FedCSIS, pages 405-410. IEEE, 2011.
  5. Xin Liu, Ziheng Jiang, Josh Fromm, Xuhai Xu, Shwetak Patel, and Daniel McDuff. Metaphys: few-shot adaptation for non-contact physiological measurement. In CHIL, pages 154-163, 2021.
  6. Olga Perepelkina, Mikhail Artemyev, Marina Churikova, and Mikhail Grinenko. Heart- track: Convolutional neural network for remote video-based heart rate monitoring. In CVPRW, pages 288-289, 2020.
  7. Ming-Zher Poh, Daniel J McDuff, and Rosalind W Picard. Non-contact, automated cardiac pulse measurements using video imaging and blind source separation. Optics express, 18(10):10762-10774, 2010.
  8. Radim Špetlík, Vojtech Franc, and Jirí Matas. Visual heart rate estimation with convo- lutional neural network. In BMVC, 2018.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Comas, J., Alomar, A., Ruiz, A., & Sukno, F.
Affiliations
Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4401306678
Cited by
4
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (PID2020-114083GB-I00, PID2020)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
remote photoplethysmography, conditional normalizing flows, darker skin tones, CIELAB color space, facial video, physiological signal estimation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review