Cited by 1,234Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringBiometric Identification and SecurityECG Monitoring and Analysis

Algorithmic principles of remote PPG

Open access
Wang, Wenjin, den Brinker, Albertus C., Stuijk, Sander, de Haan, Gerard·2017·IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering

Abstract

This paper introduces a mathematical model that incorporates the pertinent optical and physiological properties of skin reflections with the objective to increase our understanding of the algorithmic principles behind remote photoplethysmography (rPPG). The model is used to explain the different choices that were made in existing rPPG methods for pulse extraction. The understanding that comes from the model can be used to design robust or application-specific rPPG solutions. We illustrate this by designing an alternative rPPG method, where a projection plane orthogonal to the skin tone is used for pulse extraction. A large benchmark on the various discussed rPPG methods shows that their relative merits can indeed be understood from the proposed model.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tbme.2016.2609282

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Numerous other studies that stratify results against Fitzpatrick classification identify the same trend: errors in determining heart rate from wearable PPG devices that use primarily green light are increased in individuals with dark skin tones due to high absorption caused by increased amounts of epidermal melanin.

    “In addition to these examples, numerous other studies that stratify results against Fitzpatrick classification identify the same trend; errors in determining heartrate from wearable PPG devices that use primarily green light as their source is increased in individuals with dark skin tones due to the high absorption caused by increased amounts of epidermal melanin [42,43,44,45].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, W., den Brinker, A. C., Stuijk, S., & de Haan, G.
Affiliations
Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
Published
2017-07
Volume
64
Issue
7
Pages
1479-1491
ISSN
  • 0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2531
OpenAlex
W2520509592
Cited by
1,234
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 141 · 2025: 220 · 2024: 203 · 2023: 187 · 2022: 150 · 2021: 128 · 2020: 76 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 20
FWCI
20.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Technische Universiteit Eindhoven
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Biometric Identification and Security
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
Keywords
remote photoplethysmography, pulse extraction, projection plane, skin tone
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Blood Flow Velocity, Blood Volume, Blood Volume Determination, Colorimetry, Computer Simulation, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Light, Models, Biological, Photography, Scattering, Radiation, Sensitivity and Specificity, Skin Physiological Phenomena, Reproducibility of Results, Photoplethysmography, Monitoring, Ambulatory, Remote Sensing Technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review