Cited by 1,378Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlBiometric Identification and Security

Robust pulse rate from chrominance-based rPPG

de Haan, Gerard, Jeanne, Vincent·2013·IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering

Abstract

Remote photoplethysmography (rPPG) enables contactless monitoring of the blood volume pulse using a regular camera. Recent research focused on improved motion robustness, but the proposed blind source separation techniques (BSS) in RGB color space show limited success. We present an analysis of the motion problem, from which far superior chrominance-based methods emerge. For a population of 117 stationary subjects, we show our methods to perform in 92% good agreement ( ±1.96σ) with contact PPG, with RMSE and standard deviation both a factor of 2 better than BSS-based methods. In a fitness setting using a simple spectral peak detector, the obtained pulse-rate for modest motion (bike) improves from 79% to 98% correct, and for vigorous motion (stepping) from less than 11% to more than 48% correct. We expect the greatly improved robustness to considerably widen the application scope of the technology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tbme.2013.2266196

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Numerous other studies that stratify results against Fitzpatrick classification identify the same trend: errors in determining heart rate from wearable PPG devices that use primarily green light are increased in individuals with dark skin tones due to high absorption caused by increased amounts of epidermal melanin.

    “In addition to these examples, numerous other studies that stratify results against Fitzpatrick classification identify the same trend; errors in determining heartrate from wearable PPG devices that use primarily green light as their source is increased in individuals with dark skin tones due to the high absorption caused by increased amounts of epidermal melanin [42,43,44,45].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Haan, G., & Jeanne, V.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
Published
2013-10
Volume
60
Issue
10
Pages
2878-2886
ISSN
  • 0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2531
OpenAlex
W2069692225
Cited by
1,378
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 135 · 2025: 210 · 2024: 191 · 2023: 194 · 2022: 158 · 2021: 133 · 2020: 89 · 2019: 83 · 2018: 79 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 2
FWCI
10.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Biometric Identification and Security
Keywords
remote photoplethysmography, pulse rate estimation, chrominance, motion robustness, blind source separation, RGB color space, blood volume pulse, non-contact vital sign monitoring, spectral peak detection, exercise monitoring
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Blood Flow Velocity, Colorimetry, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Heart Rate, Humans, Photography, Sensitivity and Specificity, Skin Physiological Phenomena, Reproducibility of Results, Photoplethysmography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review