CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 55AI in Service InteractionsSocial Robot Interaction and HRIInnovative Human-Technology Interaction

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Lessons From an App Update at Replika AI: Identity Discontinuity in Human-AI Relationships

Open access
De Freitas, Julian, Castelo, Noah, Uğuralp, Ahmet K., Oğuz-Uğuralp, Zeliha·2024·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2412.14190arXiv 2412.14190
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Can consumers form especially deep emotional bonds with AI and be vested in AI identities over time? We leverage a natural app-update event at Replika AI, a popular US-based AI companion, to shed light on these questions. We find that, after the app removed its erotic role play (ERP) feature, preventing intimate interactions between consumers and chatbots that were previously possible, this event triggered perceptions in customers that their AI companion's identity had discontinued. This in turn predicted negative consumer welfare and marketing outcomes related to loss, including mourning the loss, and devaluing the "new" AI relative to the "original". Experimental evidence confirms these findings. Further experiments find that AI companions users feel closer to their AI companion than even their best human friend, and mourn a loss of their AI companion more than a loss of various other inanimate products. In short, consumers are forming human-level relationships with AI companions; disruptions to these relationships trigger real patterns of mourning as well as devaluation of the offering; and the degree of mourning and devaluation are explained by perceived discontinuity in the AIs identity. Our results illustrate that relationships with AI are truly personal, creating unique benefits and risks for consumers and firms alike.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2412.14190

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Blok, Sergey, George Newman, Jennifer Behr, and Lance J Rips (2001), "Inferences About Personal Identity," in Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society, Edinburgh, Scotland, 80-85.
  2. Kozinets, Robert (2019), Netnography: The Essential Guide to Qualitative Social Media Research: Sage Publications Ltd.
  3. Parfit, Derek (1984), Reasons and Persons, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  4. ---(2015), "Neurodegeneration and Identity," Psychological Science, 26 (9), 1469-79.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
De Freitas, J., Castelo, N., Uğuralp, A. K., & Oğuz-Uğuralp, Z.
Affiliations
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • Bilkent University (TR)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2412.14190
arXiv
2412.14190
OpenAlex
W4403130071
Cited by
55
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 42 · 2025: 13
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › AI in Service Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Keywords
AI companions, Replika, human-AI relationship, app updates, mourning, mental health, consumer welfare, chatbots

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review