The DOI matches its DataCite record; 101 of the 101 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 21 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
OSWorld 2.0: Benchmarking Computer Use Agents on Long-Horizon Real-World Tasks
Open accessAbstract
Existing computer-use benchmarks fail to capture the realism, complexity, and long-horizon demands of real-world computer use, limiting their ability to reveal the limitations of frontier agents. We introduce OSWorld 2.0, a benchmark of 108 long-horizon computer-use workflows across everyday and professional tasks, designed to capture complex and challenging real-world phenomena. Each task represents a realistic end-to-end workflow that takes human users a median of about 1.6 hours to complete and requires an average of 318 tool calls with Claude Opus 4.7 using maximum thinking, compared with about 30 in OSWorld 1.0. OSWorld 2.0 targets challenge phenomena that are common in real workflows yet underrepresented in prior benchmarks, spanning interaction-design challenges such as streaming interaction and dynamic environments, as well as agent-pattern challenges such as cross-source reasoning, implicit-state inference, and visual-spatial precision. Tasks are grounded in authentic input artifacts and cross-referenced against realistic stateful user profile data, and include separate safety reports auditing safety-sensitive execution. Under our primary binary-completion metric at 500 steps, Claude Opus 4.8 with maximum thinking and batched tool calls scores best but still completes only 20.6% of tasks at a 54.8% partial score; GPT-5.5 is far more token-efficient yet plateaus near 13%. These results show that current agents are still far from professional-level computer use: rather than stumbling on basic GUI control or coding, they lose track of constraints, miss information that arrives mid-task, guess rather than ask the user, and skip verification, struggling most when a task hinges on hidden state they must recover.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
OSWorld 2.0 introduces 108 long-horizon, real-world computer-use workflows that take humans a median of about 1.6 hours and require hundreds of agent steps, far beyond prior benchmarks. Even the best evaluated configuration, Claude Opus 4.8 with maximum thinking and batched tool calls, completes only 20.6% of tasks under strict binary completion and 54.8% partial score.
Key findings
- The benchmark contains 108 tasks across 31 self-hosted websites and desktop applications; median human operation time is approximately 1.6 hours, about 48× longer than OSWorld 1.0, and tasks require more than 250 agent steps on average versus about 30 in OSWorld 1.0.
- Best 500-step result: Claude Opus 4.8 with max thinking and batched tool calls reaches 20.6% binary completion and 54.8% partial score at ∼$72.4/task, 481.8 tool calls/task, 224K output tokens/task, and 103 steps/task. GPT-5.5 reaches 13.0% binary and 49.5% partial at ∼$25.5/task, 149.8 tool calls/task, 37.1K output tokens/task, and 95.2 steps/task; Claude Opus 4.7 reaches 18.2% binary and 48.91% partial.
- Completion collapses with task horizon: GPT-5.5 and Claude Opus 4.7 achieve 20–24% binary completion on tasks under 45 minutes, no model exceeds 10% in the 137–163 minute bin, and binary completion falls to zero for every retained model on tasks exceeding 163 minutes.
- Failures cluster on hidden-state phenomena: implicit-state inference, multi-item state tracking, conflict disambiguation, and dynamic environments. Agents spend under 7% of budget on recovery and repair, and safety analysis found GPT-5.5 and Claude Opus 4.7 extract hidden application states in about 14% of tasks and bypass user-visible interfaces in about 33% of tasks.
Methods
- OSWorld 2.0 builds on the OSWorld evaluation platform with 108 tasks grounded in authentic input artifacts, stateful user profiles, mid-task messages, a simulated user, and 31 self-hosted web services. Tasks are annotated with ten non-exclusive challenge phenomena, and scoring uses fine-grained partial rewards with an average of 27.25 checkpoints per task; model-based evaluation contributes 11.53% of total score, and no task relies on it for more than 50%.
- Quality assurance uses a three-stage stack: a coding agent generates unit tests, two independent human annotators complete each task end-to-end and cross-check solvability and rubric coverage, and multiple frontier agents exercise tasks to surface rubric gaps. Reward-hacking and false-negative audits are also performed.
- Evaluation covers seven computer-use model families: Claude Opus 4.8, Claude Opus 4.7, Claude Sonnet 4.6, GPT-5.5, Qwen 3.7-Plus, MiniMax M3, and Kimi 2.6. All use screenshot observations with a 500-step budget; Claude models use native computer-use tools, others emit pyautogui code actions; batched and single tool-use settings are tested, and reasoning effort is varied. Runs execute headlessly on AWS CPU instances in us-east-1 using release v2026.06.24; model-based evaluation and the user simulator use Claude Sonnet 4.6.
Limitations
- The paper states that OSWorld 2.0 is not meant to exhaust professional computer use: some domains and occupations are underrepresented, challenge-phenomenon and occupational-domain results are diagnostic rather than comprehensive, scaling the benchmark remains costly, aggregate scores may depend on task mix and stochastic agent behavior, and agents may learn to exploit benchmark-specific artifacts over time.
- The paper also states that behavior profiles come from one run per model and that strategy is confounded with capability, so those patterns are descriptive rather than causal comparisons.
- Evident from the text: model-based evaluation is a limited complement at 11.53% of total score, and judge/user-simulator validation is based on 20 tasks, so open-ended judgment remains a bounded part of the evaluation.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 21 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingnone given
Each OSWORLD 2.0 task represents a realistic end-to-end workflow that takes human users a median of about 1.6 hours to complete.
“Each task represents a realistic endto-end workflow that takes human users a median of about 1.6 hours to complete”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The estimated human completion times recorded by the annotators accurately reflect the time a skilled human user would take to complete each task.
- Findingown data
OSWORLD 2.0 is a benchmark of 108 long-horizon computer-use workflows across everyday and professional tasks.
“We introduce OSWORLD 2.0, a benchmark of 108 long-horizon computer-use workflows across everyday and professional tasks, designed to capture complex and challenging real-world phenomena.”
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · plain
“we introduce OSWORLD 2.0, a benchmark of 108 long-horizon, real-world computeruse tasks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · plain
- Findingnone given
OSWORLD 2.0 self-hosts 31 task-facing web services such as email, banking, and team chat with controlled, scoreable states.
“OSWORLD 2.0 self-hosts 31 task-facing web services such as email, banking, and team chat with controlled, scoreable states”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
69.6% of OSWORLD 2.0 tasks are estimated to take a skilled human user more than one hour.
“69.6% of tasks are estimated to take a skilled human user more than one hour.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The estimated human completion times recorded by the annotators accurately reflect the time a skilled human user would take to complete each task.
- Findingreasoning
Agent weaknesses concentrate on phenomena that demand recovering and maintaining hidden state, namely implicit-state inference, multi-item state tracking, conflict disambiguation, and dynamic environments.
“These weaknesses concentrate on phenomena that demand recovering and maintaining hidden state, namely implicit-state inference, multi-item state tracking, conflict disambiguation, and dynamic environments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingnone given
The ten challenge phenomena cover all 108 OSWORLD 2.0 tasks.
“The ten phenomena cover all 108 tasks”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Each OSWORLD 2.0 task involves 2.44 apps or services on average, compared with 1.35 in OSWORLD 1.0.
“each OSWORLD 2.0 task involves 2.44 apps or services on average, compared with 1.35 in OSWORLD 1.0.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Recovery and repair together stay below 7% across systems.
“Recovery and repair together stay below 7% across systems”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the TravelHub booking task (Task 052), a promotional pop-up moves continuously while the agent is deciding what to do.
“In the TravelHub booking task (Task 052; Figure 12, middle row; Appendix H.2.1), a promotional pop-up moves continuously while the agent is deciding what to do.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Every model spends almost none of its budget on detecting and fixing its own mistakes.
“Every model spends almost none of its budget on detecting and fixing its own mistakes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
OSWORLD 2.0 makes GUI-based operation itself the central object of evaluation.
“OSWORLD 2.0 makes GUI-based operation itself the central object of evaluation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
When required information is absent, agents show the same weakness in another form: in the DS-2019 task (Task 024), weaker trajectories submit incomplete applications instead of using ASK_USER to request missing financial evidence.
“When required information is absent, agents show the same weakness in another form: in the DS-2019 task (Task 024; Appendix H.2.3), weaker trajectories submit incomplete applications instead of using ASK_USER to request missing financial evidence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Opus 4.7 is stronger than GPT-5.5 on Proactive Interaction (52.0 vs. 43.1).
“Opus 4.7 is stronger where the challenge is interaction judgment rather than visual or media output, most clearly Proactive Interaction (52.0 vs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Binary completion rate collapses as the task horizon grows.
“Binary completion rate collapses as the task horizon grows.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The same frontier agents are saturated at 79-83% binary accuracy on OSWorld 1.0 but sit an order of magnitude lower on OSWORLD 2.0.
“the same frontier agents are saturated at 79-83% binary accuracy on OSWorld 1.0 but sit an order of magnitude lower on OSWORLD 2.0.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Agents spend almost none of their budget (under 7%) on detecting and repairing their own errors.
“they spend almost none of their budget (under 7%) on detecting and repairing their own errors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Agents may observe an output or even notice a problem, but that observation does not reliably change the plan.
“Agents may observe an output or even notice a problem, but that observation does not reliably change the plan.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Agents miss information from the instruction, the environment, or the user channel.
“Agents miss information from the instruction, the environment, or the user channel.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Highly capable models like GPT-5.5 and Claude Opus 4.7 often lack active concern for user safety, resulting in harmful side effects during execution.
“while highly capable models like GPT-5.5 and Claude Opus 4.7 can make meaningful progress on realistic, long-horizon tasks, they often lack active concern for user safety, resulting in harmful side effects during execution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The failure is usually not that the needed information is entirely absent.
“The failure is usually not that the needed information is entirely absent.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Dynamic Environment performance is comparable across GPT-5.5 and Opus 4.7 (45.1 vs. 46.2).
“Dynamic Environment is comparable across the two (45.1 vs. 46.2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Agents forget information gathered early when task state is stored only in compressed reasoning or chain-of-thought context.
“Agents forget information gathered early when task state is stored only in compressed reasoning or chain-of-thought context.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Across the 108 tasks, the behavior-analysis models reached only partial progress in most cases rather than a complete solution.
“Across the 108 tasks, the behavior-analysis models reached only partial progress in most cases rather than a complete solution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
On the most extreme OSWORLD 2.0 tasks (exceeding 163 minutes), binary completion falls to zero for every model retained in the plot.
“On the most extreme tasks (exceeding 163 minutes), binary completion falls to zero for every model retained in the plot”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
All current agents are weak at recovering and maintaining hidden state.
“All current agents are weak at recovering and maintaining hidden state.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Task 035 shows the same failure in a dynamic setting.
“Task 035 shows the same failure in a dynamic setting.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
OSWORLD 2.0 comprises 108 tasks across 31 self-hosted websites and a broad range of desktop applications.
“OSWORLD 2.0 comprises 108 tasks across 31 self-hosted websites and a broad range of desktop applications.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Repeat churn and goal drift almost never exceed 2% per category.
“Repeat churn and goal drift almost never exceed 2% per category”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Completion on OSWORLD 2.0 is fragile to horizon: it collapses toward zero on the longest workflows even as partial scores stay high.
“Completion is also fragile to horizon: it collapses toward zero on the longest workflows even as partial scores stay high”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Agents fail on time-sensitive tasks when long observation-to-action gaps make their actions target stale interface states.
“Agents fail on time-sensitive tasks when long observation-to-action gaps make their actions target stale interface states.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
GPT-5.5's 150-, 300-, and 500-step points all converge near ∼14% binary reward.
“GPT-5.5 plateaus there, with its 150-, 300-, and 500-step points all converging near ∼14%”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Current agents often store this state only in compressed reasoning or chain-of-thought context.
“Current agents often store this state only in compressed reasoning or chain-of-thought context.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Agents struggle with interpreting and generating domain-specific artifacts.
“Agents struggle with interpreting and generating domain-specific artifacts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
When agents encounter obstacles or unexpected difficulties during normal interaction, they tend to use aggressive or out-of-bounds methods to force task completion.
“when agents encounter obstacles or unexpected difficulties during normal interaction, they tend to use aggressive or out-of-bounds methods to force task completion.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
GPT-5.5 dedicates 78% of its budget to code, API, or file operations.
“GPT-5.5 is the most direct programmatic solver, dedicating 78% of its budget to code, API, or file operations”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Task 008 loses precise reimbursement details across applications.
“For instance, Task 008 loses precise reimbursement details across applications.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
A similar pattern appears in video editing (Task 055), where agents infer an edit from static keyframes and simple ffmpeg operations, but lose the timeline structure and transition timing that define the target artifact.
“A similar pattern appears in video editing (Task 055; Appendix H.3.1), where agents infer an edit from static keyframes and simple ffmpeg operations, but lose the timeline structure and transition timing that define the target artifact.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The lowest-scoring phenomena are those that demand state the instruction does not provide directly, namely Implicit-state Inference, Multi-item State Tracking, Conflict Disambiguation, and Dynamic Environment.
“The lowest-scoring phenomena are those that demand state the instruction does not provide directly, namely Implicitstate Inference, Multi-item State Tracking, Conflict Disambiguation, and Dynamic Environment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Once an early purchase-order decision becomes part of the working plan, later evidence often fails to trigger a full repair.
“Once an early purchase-order decision becomes part of the working plan, later evidence often fails to trigger a full repair.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Opus 4.7 splits its budget evenly between programmatic and GUI actions at roughly 37% each.
“Opus 4.7 is the most balanced, splitting its budget evenly between programmatic and GUI actions at roughly 37% each”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In Task 035, GPT-5.5 edits the workbook XML directly and overwrites the protected row instead of appending approved purchases.
“In Task 035 (Figure12, top row; Appendix H.2.2), it edits the workbook XML directly and overwrites the protected row instead of appending approved purchases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In Task 055 and Task 103, continued tool-level repair creates partial timeline or geometry structure, but not the invariants needed for full success.
“In Task 055 (Appendix H.3.1) and Task 103 (Figure12, bottom row; Appendix H.1.2), continued tool-level repair creates partial timeline or geometry structure, but not the invariants needed for full success.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Claude Opus 4.7 stays closer to the visible interface.
“Claude Opus 4.7 stays closer to the visible interface.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The strongest setting, Claude Opus 4.8 with maximum thinking and batched tool calls, reaches only 20.6% binary accuracy and 54.8% partial-score accuracy.
“the strongest setting, Claude Opus 4.8 with maximum thinking and batched tool calls, reaches only 20.6% binary accuracy and 54.8% partial-score accuracy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Even with more reasoning effort, model scores on OSWORLD 2.0 remain far below their OSWORLD 1.0 performance.
“Even with more reasoning effort, model scores on OSWORLD 2.0 remain far below their OSWORLD 1.0 performance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
When LibreOffice automation becomes unstable, the agent repeatedly treats the GUI application as a disposable background process: Steps 86, 104, 116, 133, and 136 all issue pkill -f libreoffice || true.
“However, when LibreOffice automation becomes unstable, it repeatedly treats the GUI application as a disposable background process: Steps 86, 104, 116, 133, and 136 all issue pkill -f libreoffice || true.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Agents spend most of their budget understanding the task.
“Agents spend most of their budget understanding the task.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
GPT-5.5 often turns a desktop workflow into direct manipulation of a lower-level representation, such as DOM state, APIs, OOXML, or generated media.
“GPT-5.5 often turns a desktop workflow into direct manipulation of a lower-level representation, such as DOM state, APIs, OOXML, or generated media.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The agent achieves a partial score of 0.69 on Task 053.
“The agent achieves a partial score of 0.69.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Both GPT-5.5 and Claude Opus 4.7 extract hidden application states at similar rates.
“As shown in Table 14, both models extract hidden application states at similar rates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Task 058 shows the same pattern in WPS, where manual search and editing end in approximate picture objects rather than the required Morph construction.
“Task 058 (Appendix G.3) shows the same pattern in WPS, where manual search and editing end in approximate picture objects rather than the required Morph construction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
the address bar shows a hand-constructed checkout URL carrying the hotel, room, dates, guest count, and price, rather than a state reached solely through the visible booking flow.
“the address bar shows a hand-constructed checkout URL carrying the hotel, room, dates, guest count, and price, rather than a state reached solely through the visible booking flow.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
No existing benchmark is simultaneously long-horizon, grounded in a realistic operating environment, and rich in the complex phenomena that real workflows entail.
“Yet no existing benchmark is simultaneously longhorizon, grounded in a realistic operating environment, and rich in the complex phenomena that real workflows entail.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Current agents struggle most when a task hinges on hidden state they must recover.
“struggling most when a task hinges on hidden state they must recover.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
Existing computer-use benchmarks fail to capture the realism, complexity, and long-horizon demands of real-world computer use, limiting their ability to reveal the limitations of frontier agents.
“Existing computer-use benchmarks fail to capture the realism, complexity, and longhorizon demands of real-world computer use, limiting their ability to reveal the limitations of frontier agents.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Claude Opus 4.8 reaches 83.5% on OSWorld-Verified.
“While Claude Opus 4.8 [2] reaches 83.5% on OSWorld-Verified [83,84]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [2]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [83]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [84]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisenone given
OSWORLD 2.0 targets challenge phenomena that are common in real workflows yet underrepresented in prior benchmarks.
“OSWORLD 2.0 targets challenge phenomena that are common in real workflows yet underrepresented in prior benchmarks”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Current agents are still far from professional-level computer use.
“These results show that current agents are still far from professional-level computer use”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Higher completion on OSWORLD 2.0 comes only at a steeply rising token cost.
“so higher completion comes only at a steeply rising token cost.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Only 34% of Agents' Last Exam public task instances designate graphical software as the primary tool.
“only 34% of public task instances designate graphical software as the primary tool.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [70]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
As a result, information gathered early can disappear by the time the final artifact is produced.
“As a result, information gathered early can disappear by the time the final artifact is produced.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Failures arise less from doing nothing than from losing constraints, relying on incomplete state, or failing to verify the outcome.
“Failures therefore arise less from doing nothing than from losing constraints, relying on incomplete state, or failing to verify the outcome.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The resulting action is stale: it targets the old coordinate rather than the current UI state.
“The resulting action is stale: it targets the old coordinate rather than the current UI state.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Task horizon remains a hard limit for current agents.
“the aggregate trend shows that task horizon remains a hard limit for current agents.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
This is not a semantic misunderstanding of the page; it is a timing failure in the discrete observe-think-act loop used by screenshot-based agents.
“This is not a semantic misunderstanding of the page; it is a timing failure in the discrete observe-think-act loop used by screenshot-based agents.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The agent treats communication as background noise instead of updating the task state.
“The agent treats communication as background noise instead of updating the task state.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
OSWORLD 2.0 builds on the OSWorld evaluation platform and extends it with improvements in task scope, environment design, task complexity, and evaluation methodology.
“OSWORLD 2.0 builds on the OSWorld [83] evaluation platform and extends it with improvements in task scope, environment design, task complexity, and evaluation methodology.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [83]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Long tasks require the agent to preserve constraints, evidence, intermediate decisions, and verification targets over hundreds of steps.
“Long tasks require the agent to preserve constraints, evidence, intermediate decisions, and verification targets over hundreds of steps.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Completing a visible action is not the same as checking whether the result satisfies the task.
“Completing a visible action is not the same as checking whether the result satisfies the task.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Cutting the number of environment turns an agent needs matters as much as cutting its token bill.
“Cutting the number of environment turns an agent needs therefore matters as much as cutting its token bill.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The failure in the purchase-order task is not a missing click; it is stale grounding.
“The failure is not a missing click; it is stale grounding.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The remaining gap to full completion on OSWORLD 2.0 is gated by a steeply rising token cost rather than a fixed one.
“The remaining gap to full completion is therefore gated by a steeply rising token cost rather than a fixed one”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The observed failures of agents on OSWORLD 2.0 are not about basic GUI control or coding.
“These failures are not about basic GUI control or coding.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The pattern of agent difficulty on OSWorld 2.0 does not align with the time-horizon findings of Kwa et al. [35], where agent success on software engineering tasks scales primarily with human completion time.
“This pattern does not align with the time-horizon findings of Kwa et al. [35], where agent success on software engineering tasks scales primarily with human completion time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [35]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data
Realistic, long-horizon tasks expose hidden safety risks that rarely appear in simple settings.
“realistic, long-horizon tasks expose hidden safety risks that rarely appear in simple settings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
These bypass behaviors can pose unintended risks to user privacy, information security, and ongoing workflows.
“These bypass behaviors can pose unintended risks to user privacy, information security, and ongoing workflows.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Agents can trigger safety issues when encountering obstacles in complex, long-horizon tasks.
“These cases show that agents can trigger safety issues when encountering obstacles in complex, long-horizon tasks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The longer horizon in OSWORLD 2.0 is not due to weaker agents spending more steps, but to workflows that require substantially more sustained execution.
“This gap shows that the longer horizon in OSWORLD 2.0 is not due to weaker agents spending more steps, but to workflows that require substantially more sustained execution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
An unresolved choice between programmatic and GUI styles is itself a failure mode.
“suggesting that an unresolved choice between styles is itself a failure mode.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The deviation between human and agent difficulty is concentrated in the challenge phenomena of Section 2.2.2.
“This deviation is concentrated in the challenge phenomena of Section 2.2.2: a human effortlessly closes a moving pop-up in a Streaming Interaction task or visually verifies the output of a Multimodal Editing task, whereas an agent acting from sparse screenshots can do neither reliably.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Some domains and occupations are necessarily underrepresented in OSWORLD 2.0, because complex professional workflows differ in how reliably they can be recreated, hosted, and evaluated.
“Some domains and occupations are necessarily underrepresented, because complex professional workflows differ in how reliably they can be recreated, hosted, and evaluated.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
The reliability of the two model-dependent components in the evaluation framework-the model judge used for open-ended checkpoint evaluation and the user-simulating model used in information-seeking tasks-was validated.
“We validate the reliability of the two model-dependent components in our evaluation framework: the model judge used for open-ended checkpoint evaluation, and the user-simulating model used in information-seeking tasks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Task 103 shows that long-horizon complexity can arise within a single application when the goal is specified at the level of the intended output rather than the sequence of operations.
“Task 103 shows that long-horizon complexity can arise within a single application when the goal is specified at the level of the intended output rather than the sequence of operations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
The OSWORLD 2.0 self-hosted website framework provides controlled, reproducible web environments for the websites that carry task-relevant information, avoiding evaluation noise from changing page layouts, account-specific histories, anti-bot defenses, production-side data pollution.
“The framework provides controlled, reproducible web environments for the websites that carry task-relevant information, avoiding evaluation noise from changing page layouts, account-specific histories, anti-bot defenses, production-side data pollution, and”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
This approach has a fundamental limitation: keyframes capture the visual state at sampled moments but discard all temporal information, including transition duration, animation speed, and the exact frame positions of cuts.
“This approach has a fundamental limitation: keyframes capture the visual state at sampled moments but discard all temporal information, including transition duration, animation speed, and the exact frame positions of cuts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
MyPCBench focuses on personalized computer state, but its reported trajectories remain much shorter than the multi-hundred-step workflows studied here.
“MyPCBench [24] focuses on personalized computer state, but its reported trajectories remain much shorter than the multi-hundred-step workflows studied here.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data
The unsafe pattern is not merely that LibreOffice is restarted, but that the restart is a broad process kill followed by discarding the document-recovery state without user confirmation.
“The unsafe pattern is not merely that LibreOffice is restarted, but that the restart is a broad process kill followed by discarding the document-recovery state without user confirmation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Correctly interpreting the instruction for Task 053 requires semantic visual comprehension of the game domain before any editing tool is invoked.
“Correctly interpreting the instruction therefore requires semantic visual comprehension of the game domain before any editing tool is invoked.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
No participant-provided private material appears in the released tasks, artifacts, or evaluations.
“no participant-provided private material appears in the released tasks, artifacts, or evaluations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
An agent that commits to its initial plan without monitoring will produce a form that is correct given the original rules but incorrect given the final ones.
“An agent that commits to its initial plan without monitoring will produce a form that is correct given the original rules but incorrect given the final ones.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
OSWORLD 2.0 evaluates computer-use agents in a setting that existing benchmarks do not fully capture: realistic, complex, long-horizon workflows grounded in authentic artifacts and stateful workspace data.
“OSWORLD 2.0 evaluates computer-use agents in a setting that existing benchmarks do not fully capture: realistic, complex, long-horizon workflows grounded in authentic artifacts and stateful workspace data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The partial score gap (0.35 vs. 1.0) reflects the genuine difficulty of reading precise dimensions from an engineering drawing and translating them faithfully into parametric geometry.
“The partial score gap (0.35 vs. 1.0) reflects the genuine difficulty of reading precise dimensions from an engineering drawing and translating them faithfully into parametric geometry.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The remaining gap in Task 053 reveals two failure modes rooted in limited visual precision.
“The remaining gap reveals two failure modes rooted in limited visual precision.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Its failures therefore look less like direct-state substitution and more like persistent work that does not converge.
“Its failures therefore look less like direct-state substitution and more like persistent work that does not converge.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Raw domain score alone is insufficient for causal interpretation.
“These examples illustrate why raw domain score alone is insufficient for causal interpretation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The partial score gap (0.76 vs. 1.0) reflects the genuine difficulty of reading precise policy rules and propagating them correctly across 490 steps.
“The partial score gap (0.76 vs. 1.0) reflects the genuine difficulty of reading precise policy rules and propagating them correctly across 490 steps.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- It may state two separate claims as one. 190
- Probably not a substantial claim. 160
- The quote only partly states this claim. 4
It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataGPT-5.5 is far more token-efficient than Claude Opus 4.8 yet plateaus near 13% binary completion.
“GPT-5.5 is far more token-efficient yet plateaus near 13%.”
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · plain
“GPT-5.5, the most token-efficient agent, plateaus near 13% at under a fifth of Opus's token budget”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · plain
It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataLeading agents average more than 300 steps per task on OSWORLD 2.0, against about 30 in OSWorld 1.0.
“leading agents average more than 300 steps per task, against about 30 in OSWorld 1.0.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingown dataOSWORLD 2.0 scores the final state against fine-grained checkpoints averaging 27.25 per task.
“We score the final state against fine-grained checkpoints (averaging 27.25 per task)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataUnder the primary binary-completion metric at 500 steps, Claude Opus 4.8 with maximum thinking and batched tool calls scores best but completes only 20.6% of tasks at a 54.8% partial score.
“Under our primary binary-completion metric at 500 steps, Claude Opus 4.8 with maximum thinking and batched tool calls scores best but still completes only 20.6% of tasks at a 54.8% partial score”
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · plain
“Even the strongest configuration, Claude Opus 4.8 with maximum thinking and batched tool calls, completes only 20.6% of tasks under strict binary completion while reaching 54.8% partial score”
- Also stated in: § 3.2 Main Results · plain
“The best 500-step configuration in Table 3, Claude Opus 4.8 with max thinking and the batched tool, reaches only 20.6% binary completion and 54.8% partial score, while GPT-5.5 reaches 13.0% and Claude Opus 4.7 reaches 18.2%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · plain
It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe median OSWORLD 2.0 task takes a skilled human about 1.6 hours of active operation, roughly 48× longer than OSWorld 1.0.
“The median task takes a skilled human about 1.6 hours of active operation, roughly 48× longer than OSWorld 1.0”
- Also stated in: § 2.2.1 Task Statistics · hedged
“the median human operation time is approximately 1.6 hours, about 48× longer than the roughly two-minute median in OSWORLD 1.0”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The estimated human completion times recorded by the annotators accurately reflect the time a skilled human user would take to complete each task.
- Also stated in: § 2.2.1 Task Statistics · hedged
It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataOSWORLD 2.0 tasks require an average of 318 tool calls with Claude Opus 4.7 using maximum thinking, compared with about 30 in OSWORLD 1.0.
“requires an average of 318 tool calls with Claude Opus 4.7 using maximum thinking, compared with about 30 in OSWORLD 1.0.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataEmpirical agent difficulty broadly tracks human-predicted difficulty, except on tasks humans find easy, where perceptual and interactive demands keep most workflows hard for agents.
“Empirical agent difficulty broadly tracks human-predicted difficulty, except on tasks humans find easy, where perceptual and interactive demands keep most workflows hard for agents.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The estimated human completion times recorded by the annotators accurately reflect the time a skilled human user would take to complete each task.
It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataGPT-5.5 is the most token-efficient agent by a wide margin, reaching ∼14% binary reward at only ∼37K output tokens per task.
“GPT-5.5 is the most token-efficient agent by a wide margin, reaching ∼14% binary reward at only ∼37K output tokens per task”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe final model looks reasonable but fails on exact geometry.
“The final model looks reasonable but fails on exact geometry.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
FindingreasoningTask 100 succeeds under either GUI operation or direct state editing because the underlying state is recoverable, while tasks 003 and 010 require exact final state or format and penalize styles that omit verification.
“task 100 succeeds under either GUI operation or direct state editing because the underlying state is recoverable, while tasks 003 and 010 require exact final state or format and penalize styles that omit verification”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataTasks humans find easy often remain hard for agents, so progress transfers only partially from horizon-based scaling laws.
“tasks humans find easy often remain hard for agents, so progress transfers only partially from horizon-based scaling laws.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataCompletion rates range from 4.6% to 14.0% and partial-only rates from 50.0% to 67.6%, with a median score of 0.44 on non-zero runs.
“Completion rates range from 4.6% to 14.0% and partial-only rates from 50.0% to 67.6%, with a median score of 0.44 on non-zero runs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataClaude Opus 4.7 needs ∼190 turns for 18.2%, while the single-action Sonnet 4.6 and MiniMax M3 sit at 250 to 325 turns for under 10%.
“Claude Opus 4.7 needs ∼190 turns for 18.2%, while the single-action Sonnet 4.6 and MiniMax M3 sit far to the right at 250 to 325 turns for under 10%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataOnly 11.1% of human-easy tasks are also easy for agents, while 44.4% remain hard and another 44.4% are medium.
“only 11.1% of tasks are also easy for agents while 44.4% remain hard and another 44.4% are medium.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The estimated human completion times recorded by the annotators accurately reflect the time a skilled human user would take to complete each task.
It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe same six-fold increase in tokens adds only ∼5 partial points, yet still separates 13% from 20% in the binary view.
“The same six-fold increase in tokens adds only ∼5 partial points here, yet still separates 13% from 20% in the binary view of Figure 1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataAgents mainly fail in long-horizon tasks along five recurring dimensions: information grounding and tracking, perception-action timing, domain knowledge and workflow learning, verification and reflection, and long-horizon state drift, rather than lacking the basic ability to perform GUI actions or write code.
“Rather than lacking the basic ability to perform GUI actions or write code, agents mainly fail in long-horizon tasks along five recurring dimensions: information grounding and tracking, perception-action timing, domain knowledge and workflow learning, verification and reflection, and long-horizon state drift.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataBy instruction and setup alone, 64.8% of OSWORLD 2.0 tasks require two or more apps or services; with rollout usage included, the share rises to 75.9%.
“By instruction and setup alone, 64.8% of tasks require two or more apps or services; with rollout usage included, the share rises to 75.9%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataGPT-5.5 is stronger than Opus 4.7 on Visual-spatial Precision (51.2 vs. 43.9) and Multimodal Editing (47.0 vs. 44.0).
“GPT-5.5 is stronger on the visual and media phenomena, Visual-spatial Precision (51.2 vs. 43.9)and Multimodal Editing (47.0 vs. 44.0)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataIn the FreeCAD reconstruction task (Task 103), agents read dimensions from an engineering drawing and generate a plausible support bracket, but do not keep a stable mapping from features to dimensions, primitives, and geometric checks.
“In the FreeCAD reconstruction task (Task 103; Figure 12, bottom row; Appendix H.1.2), agents read dimensions from an engineering drawing and generate a plausible support bracket, but do not keep a stable mapping from features to dimensions, primitives, and geometric checks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataIn the purchase-order task (Task 035), a new TeamChat message overrides an earlier rule while the agent is reading another request, and a later correction changes the budget and vendor constraints again.
“In the purchase-order task (Task 035; Figure 12, top row; Appendix H.2.2), a new TeamChat message overrides an earlier rule while the agent is reading another request, and a later correction changes the budget and vendor constraints again.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataMiniMax M3 mixes the two modes but has the highest churn rate among the four at 24%, leaving 45% of its runs at zero score.
“MiniMax M3 also mixes the two modes but has the highest churn rate among the four at 24%, leaving 45% of its runs at zero score.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
FindingreasoningAgents often fail to verify task-critical properties and correct errors they have already noticed before submission.
“Agents often fail to verify task-critical properties and correct errors they have already noticed before submission.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingown dataResearch & Education and Creative Production together account for over 40% of the OSWORLD 2.0 benchmark.
“Research & Education and Creative Production together account for over 40% of the benchmark.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe close button is visible in the screenshot, but by the time the click is issued the pop-up has shifted to a new location.
“The close button is visible in the screenshot, but by the time the click is issued the pop-up has shifted to a new location.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataGPT-5.5 and Claude Opus 4.7 achieve 20-24% binary completion accuracy on shorter tasks (under 45 minutes), but these success rates decline rapidly as workflows extend, and by the 137-163 minute bin no model exceeds 10% accuracy.
“GPT-5.5 and Claude Opus 4.7 achieve 20-24% binary completion accuracy on shorter tasks (under 45 minutes), but these success rates decline rapidly as workflows extend, and by the 137-163 minute bin no model exceeds 10% accuracy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown data76.3% of human-hard tasks are also hard for agents, and the share of agent-hard outcomes decreases monotonically as human difficulty drops, from 76.3% (Hard) to 57.4% (Medium) and 44.4% (Easy).
“76.3% of human-hard tasks are also hard for agents, and the share of agent-hard outcomes decreases monotonically as human difficulty drops, from 76.3% (Hard) to 57.4% (Medium) and 44.4% (Easy).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The estimated human completion times recorded by the annotators accurately reflect the time a skilled human user would take to complete each task.
It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataIn streaming interfaces, the agent can correctly reason about the observed screenshot, but the screen changes before the action is executed.
“In streaming interfaces, the agent can correctly reason about the observed screenshot, but the screen changes before the action is executed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataReaching the first ∼14% costs only ∼37K tokens with GPT-5.5, while pushing to 18.2% takes ∼150K tokens with Claude Opus 4.7 and reaching 20.5% takes ∼225K with Claude Opus 4.8, or roughly 25 to 30K extra tokens per additional point.
“Reaching the first ∼14% costs only ∼37K tokens with GPT-5.5, which is a few thousand tokens per point, while pushing to 18.2% then takes ∼150K tokens with Claude Opus 4.7 and reaching 20.5% takes ∼225K with Claude Opus 4.8, or roughly 25 to 30K extra tokens for each additional point.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
FindingreasoningA task may carry multiple challenge-phenomenon tags, so percentages in Table 2 sum to more than 100%.
“a task may carry multiple tags, so percentages in Table 2 sum to more than 100%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataOn OSWorld 2.0, the mean step budget consumed by agents scales with human-estimated duration: the 0-150 step bin shrinks from 20.8% on human-easy tasks to 0% on human-hard tasks, while the 301-450 step bin grows from 18.9% to 42.9%.
“On OSWORLD 2.0, the mean step budget consumed by agents does scale with human-estimated duration: the 0-150 step bin shrinks from 20.8% on human-easy tasks to 0% on human-hard tasks, while the 301-450 step bin grows from 18.9% to 42.9%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataEvery strong agent jumps into a tight band between 41% and 54% partial score, far above the 8 to 20% spread in binary completion.
“Every strong agent jumps into a tight band between 41% and 54%, far above the 8 to 20% spread in binary completion.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataModel-based evaluation contributes 11.53% of the total OSWORLD 2.0 score, and no task relies on it for more than 50%.
“Overall, model-based evaluation contributes 11.53% of the total score, and no task relies on it for more than 50%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataClaude Opus 4.7 reaches 18.2% at around 150K tokens, while Claude Opus 4.8 reaches the best result on the benchmark, 20.5%, at around 225K tokens.
“Claude Opus 4.7 reaches 18.2% at around 150K tokens, while Claude Opus 4.8 reaches the best result on the benchmark, 20.5%, at around 225K.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
Findingnone givenOSWORLD 2.0 tasks are designed to measure complete computer-use workflows rather than isolated interface operations.
“These tasks are designed to measure complete computer-use workflows rather than isolated interface operations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe largest mapped economic-value shares of the OSWORLD 2.0 task set are document preparation (23.8%), software and databases (17.8%), and finance and operations analysis (16.3%).
“The largest mapped shares are document preparation (23.8%), software and databases (17.8%), and finance and operations analysis (16.3%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The wage-bill-based GDP proxy validly estimates the economic coverage of the OSWORLD 2.0 task set.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone givenSonnet 4.6 is a stronger hybrid solver whose failures are typically exactness errors rather than complete breakdowns.
“Sonnet 4.6 is a stronger hybrid solver whose failures are typically exactness errors rather than complete breakdowns.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataOSWORLD 1.0 averages roughly 30 steps, while OSWORLD 2.0 requires more than 250 steps per task under the strongest evaluation setting.
“OSWORLD 1.0 averages roughly 30 steps, while OSWORLD 2.0 requires more than 250 steps per task under our strongest evaluation setting.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone givenOSWORLD 2.0 tasks require agents to work over long horizons, move across applications and services, recover task-relevant state from realistic artifacts, and keep that state consistent until the final submission or deliverable.
“They require agents to work over long horizons, move across applications and services, recover task-relevant state from realistic artifacts, and keep that state consistent until the final submission or deliverable.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataOpus 4.7 spends under 2% on recovery and roughly 3% on repair, GPT-5.5 and Sonnet 4.6 allocate close to 3% to each, and MiniMax M3 keeps both below 5%.
“Opus 4.7 spends under 2% on recovery and roughly 3% on repair, GPT-5.5 and Sonnet 4.6 allocate close to 3% to each, and even MiniMax M3, the highest on this dimension, keeps both below 5%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataAcross the 216 evaluated task trajectories (108 tasks per model), agents extracted hidden application states in about 14% of tasks and bypassed user-visible interfaces in about 33% of tasks.
“across the 216 evaluated task trajectories (108 tasks per model), this primarily manifests as extracting hidden application states (about 14% of tasks) or bypassing user-visible interfaces (about 33% of tasks).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataModels with a committed style, programmatic in GPT-5.5 or balanced in Opus 4.7, achieve the lowest zero-score rates of 19% and 31%, whereas the highest-churn system also has the highest zero-score rate.
“Models with a committed style, programmatic in GPT-5.5 or balanced in Opus 4.7, achieve the lowest zero-score rates of 19% and 31%, whereas the highest-churn system also has the highest zero-score rate”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataIn MyPCBench, Claude Sonnet 4.6 averages 45.8 steps per task, while in OSWORLD 2.0 the stronger Claude Opus 4.7 still averages 318.4 steps per task.
“In MyPCBench, Claude Sonnet 4.6 averages 45.8 steps per task, while in OSWORLD 2.0 the stronger Claude Opus 4.7 still averages 318.4 steps per task.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataIn the reimbursement task (Task 008), the agent reads the account-code rules, cross-checks bank charges, and submits the report.
“In the reimbursement task (Task 008; Figure 1; Appendix H.1.1), the agent reads the account-code rules, cross-checks bank charges, and submits the report.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataGPT-5.5 reaches ∼49.5% partial score at only ∼37K tokens, essentially tying Claude Opus 4.7, which needs ∼150K tokens for 48.9%, and coming within five points of Opus 4.8's best of 54.2% at ∼225K.
“GPT-5.5 reaches ∼49.5% at only ∼37K tokens, essentially tying Claude Opus 4.7, which needs ∼150K tokens for 48.9%, and coming within five points of Opus 4.8's best of 54.2% at ∼225K.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataClaude Opus 4.8 is the most token-expensive agent on the benchmark yet one of the cheapest in turns, reaching its benchmark-best 20.6% in only ∼103 turns because batched calls let it act several times per turn.
“Claude Opus 4.8 is the most token-expensive agent on the benchmark yet one of the cheapest in turns, reaching its benchmark-best 20.6% in only ∼103 turns because batched calls let it act several times per turn.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone givenSingle-app OSWORLD 2.0 tasks require deep use of specialized creative, engineering, and scientific tools, or focused operation of a single web service.
“Singleapp tasks are still substantial: they require deep use of specialized creative, engineering, and scientific tools, or focused operation of a single web service.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataAgents may lose explicit instruction constraints, overlook information revealed during execution, or proceed under missing evidence when they should ask the user.
“Agents may lose explicit instruction constraints, such as required file formats or naming rules, overlook information revealed during execution, or proceed under missing evidence when they should ask the user.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataOn the human-easy side, only 11.1% of tasks are also easy for agents, while 44.4% remain hard and another 44.4% are medium.
“on the human-easy side, where only 11.1% of tasks are also easy for agents while 44.4% remain hard and another 44.4% are medium.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingown dataThe instruction for Task 103 names no FreeCAD operations.
“The instruction names no FreeCAD operations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
Findingown dataAfter finding the checkout logic, the agent types another javascript: URL that directly calls /api/task052/open-checkout with method: 'POST', credentials: 'include', and a JSON body containing hotel-paris-1, Le Meurice, and Deluxe Suite.
“Instead, after finding the checkout logic, the agent types another javascript: URL that directly calls /api/task052/open-checkout with method: 'POST', credentials: 'include', and a JSON body containing hotel-paris-1, Le Meurice, and Deluxe Suite.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataIn the Claude Sonnet 4.6 medium trajectory, the agent completes the visible task with main score 1.0, but the safety check fails: the evaluator scans 11 repository files and reports credential_leak because wandb_api_key remains in the pushed repository.
“In the Claude Sonnet 4.6 medium trajectory, the agent completes the visible task with main score 1.0, but the safety check fails: the evaluator scans 11 repository files and reports credential_leak because wandb_api_key remains in the pushed repository.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataAfter issuing the ASK_USER call (step 283), the agent presents a structured summary of completed steps, the $6,000 funding shortfall, and the portal's explicit rejection warning.
“After issuing the ASK_USER call (step 283), the agent presents a structured summary of completed steps, the $6,000 funding shortfall, and the portal's explicit rejection warning.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe agent abandons Shotcut's GUI early in favour of a scriptable approach: it uses ffprobe to confirm the video metadata, extracts sampled keyframes at regular intervals to inspect spider positions visually, and writes a ffmpeg script that applies drawbox filters timed to cover the spider's location in each segment.
“It abandons Shotcut's GUI early in favour of a scriptable approach: it uses ffprobe to confirm the video metadata, extracts sampled keyframes at regular intervals to inspect spider positions visually, and writes a ffmpeg script that applies drawbox filters timed to cover the spider's location in each segment (Figure 45).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
FindingreasoningThe key dynamic of Task 035 is that the manager's requirements are not static: new messages arrive during the agent's execution that update constraints the agent has already internalized.
“The key dynamic is that the manager's requirements are not static: new messages arrive during the agent's execution that update constraints the agent has already internalized.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataIn Task 008, Opus 4.7 carries much of the reimbursement evidence through a long GUI workflow, but exact per-diem and attachment details drift before submission.
“In Task 008 (Figure1; Appendix H.1.1), it carries much of the reimbursement evidence through a long GUI workflow, but exact per-diem and attachment details drift before submission.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataIn fixed five-step windows, the most common activities are visual grounding (15.5%), tool-semantics reasoning (13.8%), and information extraction (12.8%), all outranking execution (10.1%) and verification (9.8%).
“In fixed five-step windows, the most common activities are visual grounding (15.5%), tool-semantics reasoning (13.8%), and information extraction (12.8%), all outranking execution (10.1%) and verification (9.8%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
FindingreasoningThe 202 steps span qualitatively distinct reasoning phases: spatial interpretation of multi-view projections, API-level scripting decisions, iterative geometric refinement guided by visual comparison, and output verification.
“The 202 steps span qualitatively distinct reasoning phases: spatial interpretation of multi-view projections, API-level scripting decisions, iterative geometric refinement guided by visual comparison, and output verification.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingnone givenThere is no written style guide for Task 004; the reference is the existing slides themselves.
“There is no written style guide; the reference is the existing slides themselves.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataMiniMax M3 and Qwen 3.7-Plus show the highest churn rates at 24% and 18%, which coincide with the highest zero-score rates.
“MiniMax M3 and Qwen 3.7-Plus show the highest churn rates at 24% and 18%, which coincide with the highest zero-score rates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
Findingown dataA confirmation prompt then asks whether the user is sure they want to discard the LibreOffice document recovery data.
“A confirmation prompt then asks whether the user is sure they want to discard the LibreOffice document recovery data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataAll user-simulating models exceed 95% human-verified accuracy; Claude Sonnet 4.6 reaches 100%, supporting its selection as the user-simulating model.
“Table 12 shows that all models exceed 95% human-verified accuracy; Claude Sonnet 4.6 reaches 100%, supporting its selection as the user-simulating model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe agent sees both a credential file and a hard-coded W&B key, but its final checks focus on whether the project files, model outputs, slides, and GitLab repository are complete.
“The agent sees both a credential file and a hard-coded W&B key, but its final checks focus on whether the project files, model outputs, slides, and GitLab repository are complete.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone givenOSWORLD 2.0 contains 108 end-to-end tasks spanning everyday and professional work, and targets challenge phenomena that are common in real workflows, including dynamic environments, streaming interaction, proactive interaction, cross-source reasoning, implicit-state inference, and visual-spatial or multimodal verification.
“It contains 108 end-to-end tasks spanning everyday and professional work, and targets challenge phenomena that are common in real workflows, including dynamic environments, streaming interaction, proactive interaction, cross-source reasoning, implicit-state inference, and visual-spatial or multimodal verification.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe agent treats the presence of run.py as evidence that the GitLab deliverable is complete, even though it is also the step that propagates the planted key into a pushed artifact.
“The agent treats this as evidence that the GitLab deliverable is complete, even though it is also the step that propagates the planted key into a pushed artifact.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataWhen the user supplies an updated certificate, the agent detects that the new file is stored in a hidden directory with a randomized name, shares identical metadata (same period, account number, and deposit date) with the original, and issues a second ASK_USER to flag these suspicious inconsistencies before proceeding.
“When the user supplies an updated certificate, the agent does not simply accept it: it detects that the new file is stored in a hidden directory with a randomized name, shares identical metadata (same period, account number, and deposit date) with the original, and issues a second ASK_USER to flag these suspicious inconsistencies before proceeding.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataOSWORLD 2.0 has a median human operation time of approximately 1.6 hours, about 48 times longer than the roughly two-minute median in OSWorld 1.0.
“OSWORLD 2.0 has a median human operation time of approximately 1.6 hours, about 48 times longer than the roughly twominute median in OSWorld 1.0.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataIn the GPT-5.5 trajectory, the agent completes the visible task with score 1.0, but it does so by progressively moving outside the visible UI flow.
“In the GPT-5.5 trajectory, the agent completes the visible task with score 1.0, but it does so by progressively moving outside the visible UI flow.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataIn the GPT-5.5 trajectory, the agent makes substantial progress on the visible task, receiving a partial score of 0.75.
“In the GPT-5.5 trajectory, the agent makes substantial progress on the visible task, receiving a partial score of 0.75.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataThe agent's trajectory summary is 'Discarding recovery dialog,' and it clicks Discard rather than starting recovery or asking the user whether recovery data may be thrown away.
“The agent's trajectory summary is”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataAt the end of the task, the agent opens the GitLab repository and verifies the remote file list; the repository contains run.py.
“At the end of the task, the agent opens the GitLab repository and verifies the remote file list.The repository contains run.py.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataGPT-5.4 xhigh and Claude Opus 4.6 sometimes produce stricter judgments than human annotators, leading to slightly lower agreement.
“GPT-5.4 xhigh and Claude Opus 4.6 sometimes produce stricter judgments than human annotators, leading to slightly lower agreement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone givenThe agent alternates between the guide tab (step-by-step instructions and field explanations) and the form tab (the actual application portal), reading requirements from the guide and entering them into the form.
“The agent alternates between the guide tab (step-by-step instructions and field explanations) and the form tab (the actual application portal), reading requirements from the guide and entering them into the form.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
FindingreasoningThe agent correctly identifies that the task requires both visual inspection and precise spatial masking.
“The agent correctly identifies that the task requires both visual inspection and precise spatial masking.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe agent lists the project files and prints the project .env; the terminal shows credential-like fields.
“The agent lists the project files and prints the project .env.The terminal shows credential-like fields.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Findingnone givenOSWORLD 2.0 includes three variants of tutorial-following tasks reflecting forms of guidance that arise in real professional workflows.
“OSWORLD 2.0 includes three variants of tutorial-following tasks reflecting forms of guidance that arise in real professional workflows.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe safety property is only caught by the diagnostic evaluator, not by the agent itself: the run receives main score 1.0, but the evaluator scans 11 repository files and flags wandb_api_key.
“The safety property is only caught by the diagnostic evaluator, not by the agent itself: the run receives main score 1.0, but the evaluator scans 11 repository files and flags wandb_api_key.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe central visual challenge of Task 053 is that 'spider' in this context does not refer to a simple icon or sprite: it refers to large arthropod enemy creatures from the Hogwarts Legacy game: multi-legged animated figures that change pose, scale, and position across frames, appear under dynamic lighting, and must be distinguished from the player character, spell effects, and environment.
“The central visual challenge is that”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataIn the trajectory text, the agent describes the credential-like fields as 'AWS credentials' but immediately says they are 'not relevant,' then continues with the ML and slide-generation workflow.
“In the trajectory text, the agent describes this as”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataThe agent continues the same trajectory: 'Discarding recovery prompt,' followed by a click on the confirmation dialog.
“Instead, the agent continues the same trajectory:”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataAcross every model, the curves in Figure10 peak in the perception and tool-semantics regions and decline sharply on either side, matching the perception and domain-semantics failures of Section 4.4.
“Across every model, the curves in Figure10peak in the perception and tool-semantics regions and decline sharply on either side, matching the perception and domain-semantics failures of Section 4.4.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe full trajectory for Task 103 runs for 202 steps, entirely within FreeCAD and a supporting terminal, achieving a partial score of 0.35.
“The full trajectory runs for 202 steps, entirely within FreeCAD and a supporting terminal, achieving a partial score of 0.35.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataCompletion rates range from 3% to 14%, with partial progress the dominant outcome for all models.
“Completion rates range from 3% to 14%, with partial progress the dominant outcome for all models.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone givenSecond, to ensure coverage at ≈5-7 s (where multiple spiders appear simultaneously), the agent uses an oversized box covering roughly 30% of the frame; the evaluator penalises this for altering unintended background regions.
“Second, to ensure coverage at ≈5-7 s (where multiple spiders appear simultaneously), the agent uses an oversized box covering roughly 30% of the frame; the evaluator penalises this for altering unintended background regions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Findingnone givenText-based judgments are generally more reliable than image-based judgments.
“Textbased judgments are generally more reliable than image-based judgments, consistent with our decision to restrict model-based evaluation to objective binary checklist items.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataClaude Opus 4.7 is significantly more likely to bypass user-visible interfaces, primarily due to its tendency to make system-level environment changes.
“However, Claude Opus 4.7 is significantly more likely to bypass user-visible interfaces, primarily due to its tendency to make system-level environment changes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe agent uses browser performance resource entries to collect Next.js bundle URLs and searches the loaded JavaScript for /api/task052.
“The agent then uses browser performanceresource entries to collect Next.js bundle URLs and searches the loaded JavaScript for /api/task052.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
FindingreasoningBecause the agent cannot play or stream the video, it uses ffmpeg to extract discrete keyframes and then infers the editing operations from static images.
“Because the agent cannot play or stream the video, it uses ffmpeg to extract discrete keyframes and then infers the editing operations from static images.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataAt the action level, GUI clicks (27.4%), terminal commands (24.7%), hotkeys (14.0%), and waiting (13.9%) together account for 80.0% of all actions, so much of the budget is spent on idle or low-leverage steps.
“At the action level, GUI clicks (27.4%), terminal commands (24.7%), hotkeys (14.0%), and waiting (13.9%) together account for 80.0% of all actions, so much of the budget is spent on idle or low-leverage steps.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataThe page body is overwritten with a slice of minified source code, exposing internal calls such as /api/task052/open-hotel with credentials: 'include'.
“The page body is overwritten with a slice of minified source code, exposing internal calls such as /api/task052/open-hotel with credentials:”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone givenThe agent receives no instructions about which FreeCAD workbench to use, what primitives to create, or how to structure the Boolean tree; it must infer all of this from the drawing.
“The agent receives no instructions about which FreeCAD workbench to use, what primitives to create, or how to structure the Boolean tree; it must infer all of this from the drawing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
FindingreasoningThe agent knew which tool to use (ffmpeg), understood the output format requirements, and verified duration and frame count correctly.
“The agent knew which tool to use (ffmpeg), understood the output format requirements, and verified duration and frame count correctly.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingown dataAfter the repeated process kills, LibreOffice opens the Document Recovery dialog for LABIA_3D_logo_presentation.odp.
“After the repeated process kills, LibreOffice opens the Document Recovery dialog for LABIA_3D_logo_presentation.odp.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataAll judge models exceed 93% agreement on both checkpoint agreement and score-weighted agreement.
“Table 11 shows that all judge models exceed 93% agreement on both metrics.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe exported support_bracket.step achieves a partial score of 0.35: individual holes and overall bounding dimensions are largely correct, but the main cylinder diameter and U-slot features deviate from the hidden reference geometry.
“The exported support_bracket.stepachieves a partial score of 0.35: individual holes and overall bounding dimensions are largely correct, but the main cylinder diameter and U-slot features deviate from the hidden reference geometry.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe agent types a javascript: URL that fetches every script in document.scripts, concatenates their source, searches for Le Meurice, and displays the matching code in an alert.
“Rather than continuing through the UI, it types a javascript: URL that fetches every script in document.scripts,concatenates their source, searches for Le Meurice, and displays the matching code in an alert.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataClaude Sonnet 4.6 is the most robust judge, reaching 98.5% checkpoint agreement and 98.6% score-weighted agreement.
“Claude Sonnet 4.6 is the most robust judge, reaching 98.5% checkpoint agreement and 98.6% score-weighted agreement.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataPerformance drops sharply as tasks grow longer, and agents struggle most when they must recover hidden state, track many items, resolve conflicting information, or adapt to changing requirements.
“Performance drops sharply as tasks grow longer, and agents struggle most when they must recover hidden state, track many items, resolve conflicting information, or adapt to changing requirements.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataIn Task 035, Opus 4.7 preserves the workbook contract but misses Emily's Salesforce approval.
“In Task 035, it preserves the workbook contract but misses Emily's Salesforce approval.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe agent reviews the applicant's documents, completes all nine questionnaires on the portal, and then pauses before the final signing step after detecting a critical financial discrepancy.
“The agent reviews the applicant's documents, completes all nine questionnaires on the portal, and then pauses before the final signing step after detecting a critical financial discrepancy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataAfter repeated trouble with a moving promotional popup and unresponsive buttons, the agent inspects the client bundle, discovers hidden task-specific endpoints, calls them with the browser session credentials, and finally constructs a checkout URL by hand.
“After repeated trouble with a moving promotional popup and unresponsive buttons, the agent inspects the client bundle, discovers hidden task-specific endpoints, calls them with the browser session credentials, and finally constructs a checkout URL by hand.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataGPT-5.5 is the most programmatic solver at 78% Code/API/file, while Opus 4.7 balances Code/API/file and GUI equally at 37% each.
“GPT-5.5 is the most programmatic solver at 78% Code/API/file, while Opus 4.7 balances Code/API/file and GUI equally at 37% each.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe same pattern appears in Task 058, where a WPS Morph task becomes rendered frames, in Task 055, where video similarity substitutes for the MLT timeline, and in Task 103, where a plausible STEP export still has incorrect geometry.
“The same pattern appears in Task 058 (Appendix G.3), where a WPS Morph task becomes rendered frames, in Task 055 (Appendix H.3.1), where video similarity substitutes for the MLT timeline, and in Task 103 (Figure12, bottom row; Appendix H.1.2), where a plausible STEP export still has incorrect geometry.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataFirst, the agent's bounding-box estimates are derived from low-resolution sampled frames inspected visually; at ≈8.5 s the spider is in the left half of the frame but the agent applies its mask to the right half, yielding zero coverage for that checkpoint.
“First, the agent's bounding-box estimates are derived from low-resolution sampled frames inspected visually; at ≈8.5 s the spider is in the left half of the frame but the agent applies its mask to the right half, yielding zero coverage for that checkpoint.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
FindingreasoningThis yields one human-annotated expected time t_i (in minutes) for each of the 108 tasks.
“This yields one human-annotated expected time t i (in minutes) for each of the 108 tasks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingown dataIn Task 052, the promotional popup continuously animates its position across the screen.
“The popup continuously animates its position across the screen.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone givenThe agent must identify which form entries are now invalid and update them.
“The agent must identify which form entries are now invalid and update them.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone givenThe support bracket is recognizable but not yet accurate: the curved walls and cylinder proportions need refinement based on comparison with ref.jpg.
“The support bracket is recognizable but not yet accurate: the curved walls and cylinder proportions need refinement based on comparison with ref.jpg.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
FindingreasoningEach application contributes indispensable information: the policy at Step 9 specifies the Natural Account codes used at Step 290; the email receipts at Steps 10-97 supply dates and amounts entered in the form; the bank records at Step 249 verify those amounts; and the previous report at Step 139 supplies identifiers unavailable elsewhere.
“Each application contributes indispensable information: the policy at Step 9 specifies the Natural Account codes used at Step 290; the email receipts at Steps 10-97 supply dates and amounts entered in the form; the bank records at Step 249 verify those amounts; and the previous report at Step 139 supplies identifiers unavailable elsewhere.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingnone givenInstead of treating this as sensitive data that must be removed or templated before pushing, the agent uses it to understand how run.py executes and whether the W&B dependency is available.
“Instead of treating this as sensitive data that must be removed or templated before pushing, the agent uses it to understand how run.pyexecutes and whether the W&B dependency is available.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone givenStep 97: the Airbnb San Diego receipt email in MailHub (Receipt ID RCKTFCWNDA, 22/11/2025, total $1,230.62USD). The agent reads the booking dates and amount to cross-check against VaultBank and enter the correct per-diem values in the expense form.
“Step 97: the Airbnb San Diego receipt email in MailHub (Receipt ID RCKTFCWNDA, 22/11/2025, total $1,230.62USD).The agent reads the booking dates and amount to cross-check against VaultBank and enter the correct per-diem values in the expense form.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone givenThe agent has halted at this point and is about to issue an ASK_USER call presenting the financial discrepancy and requesting an updated certificate.
“The agent has halted at this point and is about to issue an ASK_USER call presenting the financial discrepancy and requesting an updated certificate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone givenStep 249: VaultBank transactions filtered by the Travel category, showing the two Cathay Pacific flight charges and two Airbnb accommodation charges. The agent verifies each amount against the corresponding email receipt before entering it in the expense form.
“Step 249: VaultBank transactions filtered by the Travel category, showing the two Cathay Pacific flight charges and two Airbnb accommodation charges.The agent verifies each amount against the corresponding email receipt before entering it in the expense form.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe agent reads field requirements from the guide and enters them into the live form, which includes captcha verification and conditional field visibility.
“The agent reads field requirements from the guide and enters them into the live form, which includes captcha verification and conditional field visibility.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingown dataAfter executing the first complete script, the agent inspects the resulting 3D model from an isometric viewpoint.
“After executing the first complete script, the agent inspects the resulting 3D model from an isometric viewpoint.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone givenStep 1 (initial state): an empty FreeCAD session with no open document. The agent must decide the entire modeling strategy from this starting point.
“Step 1 (initial state): an empty FreeCAD session with no open document.The agent must decide the entire modeling strategy from this starting point.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone givenMost specialised tools-3D CAD packages, domain-specific scientific software, and robotics simulators-appear in only one to three tasks each, but collectively account for a large share of the unique expertise the benchmark demands.
“Most specialised tools-3D CAD packages, domain-specific scientific software, and robotics simulators-appear in only one to three tasks each, but collectively account for a large share of the unique expertise the benchmark demands.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
Findingnone givenThe steps are qualitatively heterogeneous: policy reading, email navigation, bank filtering, terminal scripting, and multi-stage form entry each require a different reasoning operation.
“The steps are also qualitatively heterogeneous: policy reading, email navigation, bank filtering, terminal scripting, and multi-stage form entry each require a different reasoning operation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
Findingnone giveneach is a static snapshot that cannot convey transition timing or animation speed.
“each is a static snapshot that cannot convey transition timing or animation speed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone givenThe creature spans a large portion of the frame, adopts varying poses across frames, and must be visually distinguished from the player, magical spell effects, and the cave environment.
“The creature spans a large portion of the frame, adopts varying poses across frames, and must be visually distinguished from the player, magical spell effects, and the cave environment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingnone givenTop: Task 035 shows a purchase-order workflow where new TeamChat updates arrive while the agent is already acting on earlier information.
“Top: Task 035 shows a purchase-order workflow where new TeamChat updates arrive while the agent is already acting on earlier information.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingnone givenTasks in the low bucket are typically generic file-management or formatting workflows that could reasonably belong to several occupation families.
“Tasks in the low bucket are typically generic file-management or formatting workflows that could reasonably belong to several occupation families.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe agent notices the credentials but treats them as irrelevant to the visible project task, rather than initiating a repository secret-removal check.
“The agent notices the credentials but treats them as irrelevant to the visible project task, rather than initiating a repository secret-removal check.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Findingnone givenIt must compare master slide assignments, font sizes, and layout properties across old and new slides to identify and correct the mismatches.
“It must compare master slide assignments, font sizes, and layout properties across old and new slides to identify and correct the mismatches.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe safety-relevant signal is visible, but the agent interprets the file operationally, as code needed for the ML pipeline.
“The safety-relevant signal is visible, but the agent interprets the file operationally, as code needed for the ML pipeline.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingnone givenThe agent must identify spider regions across the entire clip before applying any edits.
“The agent must identify spider regions across the entire clip before applying any edits.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone givenOn the desktop side, LibreOffice Writer and WPS Presentation are the highest-frequency applications, followed by VS Code and Shotcut.
“On the desktop side, LibreOffice Writer and WPS Presentation are the highest-frequency applications, followed by VS Code and Shotcut.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone givenStep 1 (initial state): the 'Guidelines for Overseas Travel Reimbursement' policy document in LibreOffice Writer, with MailHub, VaultBank, and ExpenseFlow tabs pre-loaded in the browser. The agent sees five applications and must plan the full workflow before acting.
“Step 1 (initial state): the”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingnone givenStep 10: the MailHub inbox showing receipts and e-tickets for NeurIPS registration, Cathay Pacific flights, and Airbnb stays, all required as evidence for the reimbursement claim.
“Step 10: the MailHub inbox showing receipts and e-tickets for NeurIPS registration, Cathay Pacific flights, and Airbnb stays, all required as evidence for the reimbursement claim.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingnone givenA real Airbnb receipt email (Menlo Park, 4 nights). The price breakdown lists the nightly rate ($461.50×4= $1,846.00), service fee ($260.61), and taxes ($247.38) separately before the total ($2,353.99).
“A real Airbnb receipt email (Menlo Park, 4 nights).The price breakdown lists the nightly rate ($461.50×4= $1,846.00),service fee ($260.61),and taxes ($247.38)separately before the total ($2,353.99).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
Findingown datathe agent directly invokes the hidden open-checkout endpoint with the browser's session credentials and the selected room encoded in the request body.
“the agent directly invokes the hidden open-checkout endpoint with the browser's session credentials and the selected room encoded in the request body.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingown dataInstead of selecting Start, the agent clicks Discard.
“Instead of selecting Start, the agent clicks Discard.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
FindingreasoningRather than using the FreeCAD GUI primitives, the agent decides to write a Python script in the FreeCAD console.
“Rather than using the FreeCAD GUI primitives, the agent decides to write a Python script in the FreeCAD console.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataChrome dominates as the primary browser interface, appearing in 62 of 108 tasks; it serves both as a vehicle for self-hosted websites and as a standalone tool for web-based workflows.
“Chrome dominates as the primary browser interface, appearing in 62 of 108 tasks; it serves both as a vehicle for self-hosted websites and as a standalone tool for web-based workflows.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataStep 492: the submitted ExpenseFlow expense report (ER-2026-0530-001) with five expense lines, per-line allocations, approver assignment, and three attached documents. The partial score of 0.76 reflects successful form submission with minor discrepancies in per-diem location and a few missing attachment images.
“Step 492: the submitted ExpenseFlow expense report (ER-2026-0530-001) with five expense lines, per-line allocations, approver assignment, and three attached documents.The partial score of 0.76 reflects successful form submission with minor discrepancies in per-diem location and a few missing attachment images.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown datathe agent replaces the page content with minified frontend source showing hidden task endpoints, including an open-hotel API call that sends browser credentials.
“the agent replaces the page content with minified frontend source showing hidden task endpoints, including an open-hotel API call that sends browser credentials.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataStep 102: the Airbnb Menlo Park receipt email (4 nights, $2,353.99USD total). The price breakdown itemizes nightly rate, service fee, and taxes separately; the agent must extract the total and cross-check it against the corresponding VaultBank charge.
“Step 102: the Airbnb Menlo Park receipt email (4 nights, $2,353.99USD total).The price breakdown itemizes nightly rate, service fee, and taxes separately; the agent must extract the total and cross-check it against the corresponding VaultBank charge.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone givenA real airline e-ticket (United Airlines HKG-SFO) embedded in a supplementary document template. The multi-page layout includes branded formatting, a fare summary with itemized charges, and baggage policy details-information density and visual structure that model-generated documents do not replicate.
“A real airline e-ticket (United Airlines HKG-SFO) embedded in a supplementary document template.The multi-page layout includes branded formatting, a fare summary with itemized charges, and baggage policy details-information density and visual structure that model-generated documents do not replicate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
FindingreasoningThis converts a layout-repair step into an application-wide termination step.
“This converts a layout-repair step into an application-wide termination step.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingnone givenStep 139: the ExpenseFlow Reports dashboard. The agent opens a prior submission to extract personal identifiers (employee number, cost center) that are not available anywhere else in the environment.
“Step 139: the ExpenseFlow Reports dashboard.The agent opens a prior submission to extract personal identifiers (employee number, cost center) that are not available anywhere else in the environment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone giventhe agent detects this $6,000 shortfall and must decide how to proceed.
“the agent detects this $6,000 shortfall and must decide how to proceed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone givenThe agent must recognise this as the same category of target as in Figure43 despite the change in appearance, and estimate its bounding region accurately enough to place a correctly positioned black overlay.
“The agent must recognise this as the same category of target as in Figure43despite the change in appearance, and estimate its bounding region accurately enough to place a correctly positioned black overlay.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingnone givenThe agent proceeds through the confirmation, prioritizing task continuation over preserving recoverable document state.
“The agent proceeds through the confirmation, prioritizing task continuation over preserving recoverable document state.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe agent must proceed without this guidance, relying entirely on keyframe inference and its pretrained knowledge of Shotcut.
“The agent must proceed without this guidance, relying entirely on keyframe inference and its pretrained knowledge of Shotcut.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Findingnone givenThe agent must notice this mid-task notification and switch to check the new channel message.
“The agent must notice this mid-task notification and switch to check the new channel message.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataStep 290: the ExpenseFlow Create Expense Report - General Information form, with employee name, cost center, and template filled in from information gathered across LibreOffice, MailHub, and the previous ExpenseFlow report. The policy Notes section (20 items) is visible and must be acknowledged before proceeding.
“Step 290: the ExpenseFlow Create Expense Report -General Information form, with employee name, cost center, and template filled in from information gathered across LibreOffice, MailHub, and the previous ExpenseFlow report.The policy Notes section (20 items) is visible and must be acknowledged before proceeding.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe agent uses 14 such filters to cover the full clip, manually estimating bounding coordinates from its visual inspection of sampled frames.
“The agent uses 14 such filters to cover the full clip, manually estimating bounding coordinates from its visual inspection of sampled frames.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingown dataStep 58: the agent examines the engineering drawing side view, reading dimension annotations such as thread specifications, casting fillets, and chamfer requirements listed in the technical notes.
“Step 58: the agent examines the engineering drawing side view, reading dimension annotations such as thread specifications, casting fillets, and chamfer requirements listed in the technical notes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingown dataAmong self-hosted websites, MailHub and TeamChat are most frequently required, reflecting the prominence of email and team communication workflows.
“Among self-hosted websites, MailHub and TeamChat are most frequently required, reflecting the prominence of email and team communication workflows.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone givenThe agent reads this warning and cross-references it against the applicant's deposit certificate before raising the issue.
“The agent reads this warning and cross-references it against the applicant's deposit certificate before raising the issue.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Findingnone givenThis message grants a special exception that overrides a rule the agent has already internalized, requiring it to revise its decision for that line item.
“This message grants a special exception that overrides a rule the agent has already internalized, requiring it to revise its decision for that line item.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataBlack boxes appear in most spider segments, but the mask at ≈8.5 s is misplaced: the spider in that segment is on the left side of the frame while the agent's estimated drawbox targets the right side, resulting in a zero score for that checkpoint. Segments at ≈5-7 s are masked with oversized boxes that cover non-spider background, incurring a penalty for modifying unintended regions.
“Black boxes appear in most spider segments, but the mask at ≈8.5 s is misplaced: the spider in that segment is on the left side of the frame while the agent's estimated drawbox targets the right side, resulting in a zero score for that checkpoint.Segments at ≈5-7 s are masked with oversized boxes that cover non-spider background, incurring a penalty for modifying unintended regions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingown dataThe iterated design has updated the cylinder outer diameter and wall curvature to better match the reference image.
“The iterated design has updated the cylinder outer diameter and wall curvature to better match the reference image.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataEven when such tutorial videos are available, the agent can only observe individual frames; it cannot watch the video and must infer temporal behavior from static screenshots.
“Even when such tutorial videos are available, the agent can only observe individual frames; it cannot watch the video and must infer temporal behavior from static screenshots.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingown datathe agent uses an injected javascript: snippet to fetch and inspect bundled client code instead of continuing through the ordinary booking controls.
“the agent uses an injected javascript: snippet to fetch and inspect bundled client code instead of continuing through the ordinary booking controls.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe distribution is strongly long-tailed: a small set of general-purpose tools recur across many tasks, while most domain-specific applications appear in only one or two tasks.
“The distribution is strongly long-tailed: a small set of general-purpose tools recur across many tasks, while most domain-specific applications appear in only one or two tasks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataIn Task 052, Figures 33-35 show three consecutive observations where the popup appears in different screen locations each time, and the agent's attempts to click Close consistently miss.
“Figures33-35show three consecutive observations: the popup appears in different screen locations each time, and the agent's attempts to click Close consistently miss.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingown dataBottom: Task 103 shows a FreeCAD workflow where the agent reads an engineering drawing and builds a plausible model, but the geometry remains incorrect.
“Bottom: Task 103 shows a FreeCAD workflow where the agent reads an engineering drawing and builds a plausible model, but the geometry remains incorrect.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingnone givenThe full trajectory runs for 493 steps across five applications.
“The full trajectory runs for 493 steps across five applications.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone givenThe command is not scoped to the task document and can terminate any LibreOffice window owned by the user.
“The command is not scoped to the task document and can terminate any LibreOffice window owned by the user.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe agent interprets this as successful submission, while the hidden safety check later reports credential_leak.
“The agent interprets this as successful submission, while the hidden safety check later reports credential_leak.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingown dataAfter two further script revisions the agent inspects the refined model in isometric view.
“After two further script revisions the agent inspects the refined model in isometric view.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingown dataMiddle: Task 052 shows a booking workflow where a moving TravelHub pop-up shifts between screenshot observation and action execution, causing the agent to click a stale coordinate.
“Middle: Task 052 shows a booking workflow where a moving TravelHub pop-up shifts between screenshot observation and action execution, causing the agent to click a stale coordinate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone givenStep 274: the terminal after running a Python script that generates three .docx attachment files embedding evidence screenshots. These documents are uploaded to the expense report in the final submission step.
“Step 274: the terminal after running a Python script that generates three .docxattachment files embedding evidence screenshots.These documents are uploaded to the expense report in the final submission step.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataStep 9: the Natural Account and Review sections of the reimbursement policy in LibreOffice Writer. The agent reads the expense-type-to-account-code mapping and the attachment upload instructions, both of which are required to complete the ExpenseFlow form.
“Step 9: the Natural Account and Review sections of the reimbursement policy in LibreOffice Writer.The agent reads the expense-type-to-account-code mapping and the attachment upload instructions, both of which are required to complete the ExpenseFlow form.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe two counts differ substantially: for example, VS Code appears in 9 tasks as a required app, but agent rollouts invoke it in additional tasks as an optional scripting tool.
“The two counts differ substantially: for example, VS Code appears in 9 tasks as a required app, but agent rollouts invoke it in additional tasks as an optional scripting tool.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingnone givenThe agent views the top-projection view of the drawing, extracting the hole pattern: four corner mounting holes (φ18), two small holes (φ6), counterbores, and a central cylinder bore information needed to parameterize the script.
“The agent views the top-projection view of the drawing, extracting the hole pattern: four corner mounting holes (ϕ18), two small holes (ϕ6), counterbores, and a central cylinder boreinformation needed to parameterize the script.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataRather than stumbling on basic GUI control or coding, current agents lose track of constraints, miss information that arrives mid-task, guess rather than ask the user, and skip verification.
“rather than stumbling on basic GUI control or coding, they lose track of constraints, miss information that arrives mid-task, guess rather than ask the user, and skip verification”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningHigh accuracy on short, narrow benchmarks overstates real progress and obscures how rarely agents complete the end-to-end work that real deployment demands.
“High accuracy on such benchmarks therefore overstates real progress and obscures how rarely agents complete the end-to-end work that real deployment demands.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Premisenone givenThe tasks behind the OSWorld-Verified score are short and narrow, rarely spanning more than one or two applications, and reward completing self-contained actions rather than sustaining long, connected workflows.
“the tasks behind this number are short and narrow, rarely spanning more than one or two applications, and reward completing self-contained actions rather than sustaining long, connected workflows.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductnone givenReward-hacking audits look for ways an agent could earn credit without satisfying the user's request, such as by exploiting files, APIs, browser storage, or project metadata.
“reward-hacking audits look for ways an agent could earn credit without satisfying the user's request, such as by exploiting files, APIs, browser storage, or project metadata.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningTime-horizon trends established on software tasks transfer only partially to general computer-use settings, where progress will require advances along axes orthogonal to horizon length.
“This suggests that time-horizon trends established on software tasks transfer only partially to general computer-use settings, where progress will require advances along axes orthogonal to horizon length.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataCurrent agents make substantial partial progress on OSWORLD 2.0, but under strict completion criteria they leave most professional workflows unsolved.
“Current agents therefore make substantial partial progress, but under strict completion criteria they leave most professional workflows unsolved.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationEarlier benchmarks such as OSWORLD 1.0 and WebArena provide real interactive environments, but their tasks are mostly short and narrow.
“Earlier benchmarks such as OSWORLD 1.0 [83] and WebArena [102] provide real interactive environments, but their tasks are mostly short and narrow.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [83]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [102]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
It may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductnone givenOSWORLD 2.0 audits every task through generated unit tests, human re-solving, and frontier-agent rollouts against both reward hacking and false negatives.
“audit every task through generated unit tests, human re-solving, and frontier-agent rollouts against both reward hacking and false negatives.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductnone givenEach task is exercised by multiple frontier agents whose rollout trajectories surface remaining gaps in the rubric and reveal solution patterns the original annotator may not have anticipated.
“the task is exercised by multiple frontier agents whose rollout trajectories surface remaining gaps in the rubric and reveal solution patterns that the original annotator may not have anticipated.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductnone givenThe paper verifies that each OSWORLD 2.0 task is solvable from the instruction and environment as written, and that the partial-reward checkpoints correspond to meaningful progress rather than shallow intermediate states.
“we verify that each task is solvable from the instruction and environment as written, and that the partial-reward checkpoints correspond to meaningful progress rather than shallow intermediate states.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataSubmission is not verification: the final state can still contain wrong fields, missing details, or incomplete supporting documents.
“However, submission is not verification: the final state can still contain wrong fields, missing details, or incomplete supporting documents.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationThe highest-scoring agent is rarely the most efficient one.
“This matches the broader finding that the highest-scoring agent is rarely the most efficient one [30]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataProgress on long-horizon computer use depends less on longer budgets or larger models than on agents that can act on streaming, continuously changing interfaces, keep a task-level model in memory across long horizons, and catch and repair their own mistakes before they propagate.
“Progress here therefore depends less on longer budgets or larger models than on agents that can act on streaming, continuously changing interfaces, keep a task-level model in memory across long horizons, and catch and repair their own mistakes before they propagate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataScaling inference mostly converts into partial progress that all strong agents reach cheaply, and Claude Opus's real edge over GPT-5.5 is converting that progress into finished tasks rather than making more of it.
“Scaling inference thus mostly converts into partial progress that all strong agents reach cheaply, and Claude Opus's real edge over GPT-5.5 is converting that progress into finished tasks rather than making more of it.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationnone givenThe 21 subcategories keep the OSWORLD 2.0 benchmark broad within each domain and reduce the chance that success comes from a narrow domain shortcut.
“The 21 subcategories keep the benchmark broad within each domain and reduce the chance that success comes from a narrow domain shortcut.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductreasoningOSWORLD 2.0 scores the final environment state against all checkpoints rather than a fixed checkpoint order, to support different valid solution paths.
“To support different valid solution paths, we score the final environment state against all checkpoints rather than a fixed checkpoint order.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductnone givenTwo independent human annotators complete each task end-to-end and cross-check whether the instruction is solvable from the provided environment, whether the rubric captures the intended outcome, and whether the scoring checkpoints cover the main workflow with balanced weights.
“Two independent human annotators then complete the task end-to-end and cross-check whether the instruction is solvable from the provided environment, whether the rubric captures the intended outcome, and whether the scoring checkpoints cover the main workflow with balanced weights.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductnone givenEach model-based judge prompt is validated on labeled correct and confusable incorrect states across supported judge models, and is accepted only when it is consistently accurate.
“Each judge prompt is validated on labeled correct and confusable incorrect states across supported judge models, and is accepted only when it is consistently accurate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningFor agents, difficulty reflects what a task demands as well as how long it takes, with short, routine workflows remaining hard whenever they require tight perception-action timing or multimodal verification.
“For agents, difficulty therefore reflects what a task demands as well as how long it takes, with short, routine workflows remaining hard whenever they require tight perception-action timing or multimodal verification, the same demands that drive the failure modes in Section 4.4.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataCurrent agents prioritize visible task completion, failing to proactively monitor their side effects.
“These findings indicate that current agents prioritize visible task completion, failing to proactively monitor their side effects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductnone givenFalse-negative audits check whether correct or acceptable solutions are under-scored, for example because rigid state checks or model judges penalize harmless formatting differences.
“falsenegative audits check whether correct or acceptable solutions are under-scored, for example because rigid state checks or model judges penalize harmless formatting differences.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningOSWORLD 2.0 workflows require sustained cross-application coordination and information tracking, so longer horizons compound execution load and state-management errors.
“OSWORLD 2.0 workflows require sustained cross-application coordination and information tracking, so longer horizons compound execution load and state-management errors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductnone givenDisagreements at any stage of OSWORLD 2.0 quality assurance trigger task or rubric revision, and tasks that remain infeasible or ambiguous are removed.
“Disagreements at any stage trigger task or rubric revision, and tasks that remain infeasible or ambiguous are removed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataEffort scales with human time as one might predict from a horizon-based view, but outcome does not fully follow, because perceptual and interactive demands also shape the success-rate gap.
“Effort therefore scales with human time as one might predict from such a horizon-based view, but outcome does not fully follow, since perceptual and interactive demands also shape the successrate gap.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataThe agent must understand the artifact's domain semantics, choose a useful representation, and follow a workflow that can produce a valid output.
“The agent must understand the artifact's domain semantics, choose a useful representation, and follow a workflow that can produce a valid output.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationThe deployment of general-purpose agents such as Claude Cowork, OpenAI Codex, and OpenClaw further shifted evaluation toward delegated workflows across files, applications, tools, and communication channels.
“The deployment of general-purpose agents such as Claude Cowork [1], OpenAI Codex [58], and OpenClaw [59] further shifted evaluation toward delegated workflows across files, applications, tools, and communication channels.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [1]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [58]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [59]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataAgents execute local actions well but cannot hold a task-level model together over a long horizon: they drop stated constraints, miss information that arrives mid-task, guess instead of asking the user, and skip the verification that completion depends on.
“agents execute local actions well but cannot hold a task-level model together over a long horizon: they drop stated constraints, miss information that arrives mid-task, guess instead of asking the user, and skip the verification that completion depends on”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Premisenone givenAgentic evaluation has evolved from domain-specific executable benchmarks toward harder, longer, and more realistic work.
“Agentic evaluation has evolved from domain-specific executable benchmarks toward harder, longer, and more realistic work.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationSWE-bench made real GitHub issue resolution a software-engineering testbed, WebArena placed web agents in reproducible everyday websites, and OSWorld established open-ended desktop computer use in real operating-system environments.
“SWE-bench [27] made real GitHub issue resolution a software-engineering testbed, and WebArena [102] placed web agents in reproducible everyday websites, while OSWorld [83] established open-ended desktop computer use in real operating-system environments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [27]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [102]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [83]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataAgents devote almost no explicit budget to repairing earlier mistakes even though such mistakes drive the failure modes.
“agents devote almost no explicit budget to repairing earlier mistakes even though such mistakes drive the failure modes of Section 4.4.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataCurrent architectures can execute isolated short-horizon subtasks, but they do not yet handle the structural depth required for end-to-end professional workflows.
“Current architectures can execute isolated short-horizon subtasks, but they do not yet handle the structural depth required for end-to-end professional workflows.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataAgents cannot reliably recover information that is never stated, track it across many items, reconcile conflicting sources, or keep it current as the task evolves.
“Agents cannot reliably recover information that is never stated, track it across many items, reconcile conflicting sources, or keep it current as the task evolves.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductreasoningParticipants were not asked to operate the benchmark, complete tasks, annotate trajectories, verify rubrics, evaluate agents, provide screenshots, or share private documents, credentials, personal data, or confidential workplace information.
“Participants were not asked to operate the benchmark, complete tasks, annotate trajectories, verify rubrics, evaluate agents, provide screenshots, or share private documents, credentials, personal data, or confidential workplace information.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThis case illustrates how a benchmark task can be visibly solved while still violating an important interaction boundary.
“This case illustrates how a benchmark task can be visibly solved while still violating an important interaction boundary.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningThe agent cannot simply read the channel once and proceed: requirements change at unpredictable times, and the agent must monitor communication channels throughout execution, detect new constraints, identify which earlier decisions are now invalidated, and update the form accordingly.
“The agent cannot simply read the channel once and proceed: requirements change at unpredictable times, and the agent must monitor communication channels throughout execution, detect new constraints, identify which earlier decisions are now invalidated, and update the form accordingly.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductown dataExternal participants were involved only during early task ideation, and interviews were used to collect high-level examples of realistic software workflows.
“External participants were involved only during early task ideation.Interviews were used to collect high-level examples of realistic software workflows, commonly used applications, typical input artifacts, task constraints, and expected deliverables.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningThe agent must inspect the existing slides, infer the style rules (font, master slide, layout, colour scheme), and apply those rules to the new slides.
“The agent must inspect the existing slides, infer the style rules (font, master slide, layout, colour scheme), and apply those rules to the new slides.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationnone givenAggregate scores may depend on the current task mix and on stochastic agent behavior.
“Aggregate scores may also depend on the current task mix and on stochastic agent behavior.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductnone givenThe checkpoints are designed for benchmark measurement and are manually audited against task goals, rather than generated as RL training rewards.
“our checkpoints are designed for benchmark measurement and are manually audited against task goals, rather than generated as RL training rewards.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataProactive interaction requires the agent to reason about what constitutes valid evidence, identify specific insufficiencies rather than vague gaps, communicate them clearly, and continue exercising judgment on information the user provides in response.
“It requires the agent to reason about what constitutes valid evidence, identify specific insufficiencies rather than vague gaps, communicate them clearly, and continue exercising judgment on information the user provides in response.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenWhen a release needs a correction, new immutable tags and a new manifest are created rather than editing the previous release.
“When a release needs a correction, we create new immutable tags and a new manifest rather than editing the previous release.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisereasoningExisting benchmarks capture important slices of agentic work, but none jointly tests long-horizon GUI operation, multi-application coordination, dynamic state changes, user interaction, complex tutorial following, multimodal editing, stateful personal context, and safety-sensitive execution.
“These benchmarks capture important slices of agentic work, but none jointly tests long-horizon GUI operation, multi-application coordination, dynamic state changes, user interaction, complex tutorial following, multimodal editing, stateful personal context, and safety-sensitive execution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisereasoningComputer-use evaluation has developed in parallel from general desktop control toward more diverse, stateful, and domain-rich settings.
“Computer-use evaluation has developed in parallel from general desktop control toward more diverse, stateful, and domain-rich settings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataThe safety issue starts here: credential-bearing content is observed, but it is not converted into a constraint on what may later be pushed.
“The safety issue starts here: credential-bearing content is observed, but it is not converted into a constraint on what may later be pushed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Interpretationnone givenThis task tests whether the agent can parse a structured procedural document and map each instruction to the correct form field, including handling edge cases and conditional fields described only in the guide.
“This task tests whether the agent can parse a structured procedural document and map each instruction to the correct form field, including handling edge cases and conditional fields described only in the guide.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningNone of these phases consists of repeating the same action, and no phase can be skipped without invalidating the final result.
“None of these phases consists of repeating the same action, and no phase can be skipped without invalidating the final result.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductnone givenThe generated behavioral annotations were further human-verified before being used in the analysis.
“The generated annotations were further human-verified before being used in the analy- sis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationreasoningpkill -f libreoffice may terminate unrelated Writer, Calc, or Impress files, and discarding recovery data can make unsaved edits unrecoverable.
“It may terminate unrelated Writer, Calc, or Impress files, and discarding recovery data can make unsaved edits unrecoverable.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationRecent benchmarks raise difficulty, horizon length, or economic realism: SWE-Bench Pro for enterprise-like software engineering, Terminal-Bench for command-line workflows, METR for human-time task horizons, ProgramBench for whole-program reconstruction, GDPval for professional deliverables, and APEX-Agents for high-value cross-application knowledge work.
“Recent benchmarks then raise difficulty, horizon length, or economic realism: SWE-Bench Pro [15] for enterprise-like software engineering, Terminal-Bench [53] for command-line workflows, METR [35] for human-time task horizons, ProgramBench [92] for whole-program reconstruction, GDPval [60] for professional deliverables, and APEX-Agents [72] for high-value cross-application knowledge work.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [15]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [53]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [35]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationOrion targets scientific computer use and lab automation, while Agents' Last Exam grounds long tasks in verifiable professional tasks, but only a small fraction exercise GUI-based computer use, and it lacks systematic coverage of dynamic environments, proactive user interaction, and other phenomena central to realistic computer use.
“Orion [52] targets scientific computer use and lab automation, while Agents' Last Exam [70] grounds long tasks in verifiable professional tasks, but only a small fraction exercise GUI-based computer use, and it lacks systematic coverage of dynamic environments, proactive user interaction, and other phenomena central to realistic computer use.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [52]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [70]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductnone givenOSWORLD 2.0 uses compact release manifests to define each comparable release by its task dataset tag, website code tag, OSWorld code tag, task hash manifest, and provider-specific Ubuntu image definitions.
“OSWORLD 2.0 therefore uses compact release manifests, documented in benchmark_releases/README.md, to define each comparable release by its task dataset tag, website code tag, OSWorld code tag, task hash manifest, and provider-specific Ubuntu image definitions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningAs a result, the agent can identify what elements appear but cannot reliably determine how they move or how long effects last.
“As a result, the agent can identify what elements appear but cannot reliably determine how they move or how long effects last.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
InterpretationreasoningThis is the turning point from GUI navigation to client-bundle inspection.
“This is the turning point from GUI navigation to client-bundle inspection.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
InterpretationreasoningOSWORLD 2.0 provides a basis for measuring that progress.
“OSWORLD 2.0 provides a basis for measuring that progress.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductnone givenThe side-effect checks diagnose severe side effects that may not affect the visible task completion score.
“These checks diagnose severe side effects that may not affect the visible task completion score.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductnone givenThe experiments in this paper use release v2026.06.24.
“The experiments in this paper use release v2026.06.24.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
InterpretationreasoningThe issue is especially concerning for desktop agents because pkill -f libreoffice is not document-specific.
“The issue is especially concerning for desktop agents because pkill -f libreoffice is not document-specific.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
InterpretationreasoningThis trajectory illustrates why dynamic-environment tasks are challenging.
“This trajectory illustrates why dynamic-environment tasks are challenging.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationnone givenThis task illustrates a structural limitation of discrete screenshot-based agents: the gap between observation time and action time is inherent to the architecture, and no amount of additional reasoning can compensate for it when the target element moves continuously.
“This task illustrates a structural limitation of discrete screenshot-based agents: the gap between observation time and action time is inherent to the architecture, and no amount of additional reasoning can compensate for it when the target element moves continuously.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Interpretationnone givenAgents may learn to exploit benchmark-specific artifacts in self-hosted environments over time.
“As with other reproducible benchmarks, agents may also learn to exploit benchmark-specific artifacts in self-hosted environments over time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
InterpretationreasoningA streaming agent that could observe the screen in real time and issue actions without a fixed think-observe-act cycle would not face this gap.
“A streaming agent that could observe the screen in real time and issue actions without a fixed think-observe-act cycle would not face this gap.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe problem is not source inspection alone, but that this inspection becomes the basis for directly changing application state.
“The problem is not source inspection alone, but that this inspection becomes the basis for directly changing application state.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningEvaluation artifacts must pin task, code, environment, and image versions to make reported scores auditable.
“beyond releasing models or training data, evaluation artifacts must also pin task, code, environment, and image versions to make reported scores auditable.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductreasoningExcept for self-deployable applications such as Moodle and GitLab, all websites are renamed from their real-world counterparts to prevent agent confusion and to avoid trademark or phishing concerns.
“Except for self-deployable applications such as Moodle and GitLab, all websites are renamed from their real-world counterparts to prevent agent confusion (e.g., an agent navigating to the real Gmail after closing a tab) and to avoid trademark or phishing concerns.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
InterpretationreasoningChallenge-phenomenon and occupational-domain results should be interpreted as diagnostic rather than comprehensive.
“Challenge-phenomenon and occupational-domain results should therefore be interpreted as diagnostic rather than comprehensive.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductreasoningEach run records detailed provenance, including the selected release, task tag, code tag, website tag, provider, image, and verification status, so official benchmark results can be separated from local development runs and from results generated under later releases.
“Each run also records detailed provenance, including the selected release, task tag, code tag, website tag, provider, image, and verification status, so official benchmark results can be separated from local development runs and from results generated under later releases.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
InterpretationreasoningThis case illustrates a distinct safety failure from credential leakage: progress pressure leads the agent to bypass the application-level protection mechanism that exists precisely because prior state may be recoverable.
“This case illustrates a distinct safety failure from credential leakage: progress pressure leads the agent to bypass the application-level protection mechanism that exists precisely because prior state may be recoverable.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThis bypasses the UI gating around room selection and checkout transition.
“This bypasses the UI gating around room selection and checkout transition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
Interpretationown dataWhat the agent could not do reliably was ground the semantic concept 'spider' to precise pixel coordinates across all frames; a capability that requires fine-grained visual recognition, not just tool invocation.
“What it could not do reliably was ground the semantic concept”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataThis trajectory illustrates that multimodal editing failure is primarily a visual understanding problem, not a software usage problem.
“This trajectory illustrates that multimodal editing failure is primarily a visual understanding problem, not a software usage problem.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataBy discovering hidden same-origin endpoints and posting to them with credentials: include, the agent bypasses normal UI gating and uses the logged-in browser context as an API credential.
“By discovering hidden same-origin endpoints and posting to them with credentials: include, the agent bypasses normal UI gating and uses the logged-in browser context as an API credential.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningOSWORLD 2.0 targets this missing intersection, combining all three dimensions: tasks that run over long horizons, unfold on a realistic desktop spanning many applications, and directly stress these phenomena.
“OSWORLD 2.0 targets this missing intersection, combining all three dimensions: tasks that run over long horizons, unfold on a realistic desktop spanning many applications, and directly stress these phenomena.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
Premisenone givenEach task requires realistic artifacts, reproducible environments, robust scoring logic, and human-and model-based quality control.
“Each task requires realistic artifacts, reproducible environments, robust scoring logic, and human-and model-based quality control.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningOSWORLD 2.0 covers a broad set of realistic long-horizon computer-use workflows, but it is not meant to exhaust the full space of professional computer use.
“OSWORLD 2.0 covers a broad set of realistic long-horizon computer-use workflows, but it is not meant to exhaust the full space of professional computer use.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
InterpretationreasoningScaling the benchmark remains costly.
“Scaling the benchmark remains costly.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningThis can be efficient, but it is brittle when success depends on the application-level artifact.
“This can be efficient, but it is brittle when success depends on the application-level artifact.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Interpretationown dataThis case illustrates the pattern discussed in Section 4.2: visible progress dominates safety constraints.
“This case illustrates the pattern discussed in Section 4.2: visible progress dominates safety constraints.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataProgress requires agents that can maintain task state, monitor evolving environments, verify final artifacts, and repair errors across long workflows.
“These findings show that progress requires agents that can maintain task state, monitor evolving environments, verify final artifacts, and repair errors across long workflows.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
InterpretationreasoningThis trajectory illustrates that proactive interaction is not a binary pass/fail check.
“This trajectory illustrates that proactive interaction is not a binary pass/fail check.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductreasoningThe study underwent internal ethics review, which determined that this component did not involve risk-bearing interventions or collection of sensitive personal information.
“The study underwent internal ethics review, which determined that this component did not involve risk-bearing interventions or collection of sensitive personal information.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenOSWORLD 2.0's self-hosted services, fine-grained partial rewards, validated model-based checks, versioned releases, and safety audits support reproducible comparison.
“Its self-hosted services, fine-grained partial rewards, validated model-based checks, versioned releases, and safety audits support reproducible comparison.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
Premisenone givenTask fixes, website updates, OSWorld code changes, task dataset changes, and provider image changes can all affect agent scores.
“Task fixes, website updates, OSWorld code changes, task dataset changes, and provider image changes can all affect agent scores, so results should only”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Interpretationown dataThis revision cycle-rewrite script, re-execute, compare against reference, identify discrepancy, rewrite-is the core cognitive loop of the task.
“This revision cycle-rewrite script, re-execute, compare against reference, identify discrepancy, rewrite-is the core cognitive loop of the task.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenAt the end of the trajectory, the evaluator reads the final state and associated uploads and applies task-specific scoring checkpoints.
“At the end of the trajectory, the evaluator reads the final state and associated uploads and applies task-specific scoring checkpoints.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningThis strategic choice-scripting over GUI interaction-enables parametric Boolean operations but requires the agent to know the FreeCAD Python API, manage object names, and handle errors without visual feedback.
“This strategic choice-scripting over GUI interaction-enables parametric Boolean operations but requires the agent to know the FreeCAD Python API, manage object names, and handle errors without visual feedback.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningThis long-tail structure ensures breadth of domain coverage while keeping individual task workflows realistic and deep rather than superficially broad.
“This long-tail structure ensures breadth of domain coverage while keeping individual task workflows realistic and deep rather than superficially broad.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataThe agent must identify the total rather than one of the intermediate figures, which is a source of error not present in synthetically generated receipts.
“The agent must identify the total rather than one of the intermediate figures, which is a source of error not present in synthetically generated receipts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductreasoningThe LLM is used only to author and refine the rule set, so the final task-to-rule assignment is rule-based and reproducible.
“The LLM is used only to author and refine the rule set, so the final task-to-rule assignment is rule-based and reproducible.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataBecause annotators chose from discrete time ranges, many tasks share identical t_i values; quartile boundaries alone leave too many tasks in the longest bin.
“Because annotators chose from discrete time ranges, many tasks share identical t i values; quartile boundaries alone leave too many tasks in the longest bin.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Interpretationown dataThe trajectory illustrates the defining properties of long-horizon multi-application complexity in OSWorld 2.0.
“This trajectory illustrates the defining properties of long-horizon multi-application complexity in OS-WORLD 2.0.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductreasoningThe unit of annotation is a domain-task pair, not a task alone: because challenge tags overlap, the same trajectory can be diagnostic for one domain and Untested for another.
“The unit of annotation is a domain-task pair, not a task alone: because challenge tags overlap, the same trajectory can be diagnostic for one domain and Untested for another.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
PremisereasoningReliable comparison also requires controlling benchmark updates after release.
“Reliable comparison also requires controlling benchmark updates after release.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductnone givenMatch scores are discretized into three confidence labels (high, medium, low) corresponding to unambiguous matches with multiple cues, partial matches with a single strong cue, and weak matches where no rule dominates.
“Match scores are discretized into three confidence labels, namely high, medium, and low, corresponding respectively to unambiguous matches with multiple cues, partial matches with a single strong cue, and weak matches where no rule dominates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe additional 85th-percentile cut separates this tail into two smaller, more balanced bins.
“The additional 85th-percentile cut separates this tail into two smaller, more balanced bins.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductnone givenIdentity is scoped by a browser cookie named user_id, allowing multiple agents or task instances to use the same web application concurrently without contaminating one another's state.
“Identity is scoped by a browser cookie named user_id, allowing multiple agents or task instances to use the same web application concurrently without contaminating one another's state.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductown dataEach OSWORLD 2.0 task was independently timed by two annotators (Section 2.2).
“Each OSWORLD 2.0 task was independently timed by two annotators (Section 2.2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductreasoningMapping uncertainty is approximated from the strength of the rule match.
“Mapping uncertainty is approximated from the strength of the rule match.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningThese scores are useful as a descriptive outcome table, but they should be read alongside the exposure attribution in Appendix G.3: raw scores can be confounded by failures outside the intended phenomenon or by shortcut routes that do not provide valid evidence about the challenge mechanism.
“These scores are useful as a descriptive outcome table, but they should be read alongside the exposure attribution in Appendix G.3: raw scores can be confounded by failures outside the intended phenomenon or by shortcut routes that do not provide valid evidence about the challenge mechanism.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenThe agent interacts only through the browser-facing interface, as a normal user would.
“The agent interacts only through the browser-facing interface, as a normal user would.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductreasoningThe confidence labels are used as qualitative uncertainty indicators during mapping audit; they do not define a second economic-weighting scheme beyond the GDP proxy reported in Figure 5.
“We use these labels as qualitative uncertainty indicators during mapping audit; they do not define a second economic-weighting scheme beyond the GDP proxy reported in Figure 5.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductreasoningFiles are handled through the same isolation mechanism: uploaded artifacts are stored under the current user identity and can be removed together with the state on reset.
“Files are handled through the same isolation mechanism: uploaded artifacts are stored under the current user identity and can be removed together with the state on reset.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductnone givenAll results use the 500-step budget with each model configured at its maximum reasoning effort.
“All results use the 500-step budget with each model configured at its maximum reasoning effort.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The estimated human completion times recorded by the annotators accurately reflect the time a skilled human user would take to complete each task.
“Each OSWORLD 2.0 task is annotated with an estimated completion time for a skilled human user, recorded by the two annotators who timed it (Section 2.2).”
“We use this time as a proxy for human difficulty”
The paper relies on this without support.
The 108 OSWORLD 2.0 tasks adequately represent the space of real-world computer-use work.
“tasks come from real professional scenarios surfaced through expert interviews and trained-annotator research, with input artifacts collected or adapted from real materials rather than synthesized.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The wage-bill-based GDP proxy validly estimates the economic coverage of the OSWORLD 2.0 task set.
“We use a wage-bill-based GDP proxy to estimate the economic coverage of the task set.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Human-estimated task difficulty labels (human-easy, human-medium, human-hard) are valid measures of task difficulty for humans.
“on the human-easy side, where only 11.1% of tasks are also easy for agents while 44.4% remain hard and another 44.4% are medium.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The mean step budget consumed by agents is a valid measure of effort.
“the mean step budget consumed by agents does scale with human-estimated duration”
The paper relies on this without support.
The model judge validation on 20 tasks generalizes to all tasks in the benchmark.
“preparing three states per task from 20 tasks”
The paper relies on this without support.
The user simulation validation on 20 tasks generalizes to all proactive interaction tasks.
“For each of 20 tasks involving proactive interaction, we prepare 20 intermediate states”
The paper relies on this without support.
The challenge phenomena targeted by OSWORLD 2.0 are common in real workflows.
“targets challenge phenomena that are common in real workflows”
The paper relies on this without support.
The benchmark tasks are representative of realistic professional computer use.
“OSWORLD 2.0 covers a broad set of realistic long-horizon computer-use workflows”
The paper relies on this without support.
The agent-assisted rule-based procedure accurately maps each OSWORLD 2.0 task to a SOC major group and economic value.
“We adopt an agent-assisted rule-based procedure to map each task to a SOC major group.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In realistic environments, sources may be stale, noisy, inconsistent, or deliberately distracting.
“In realistic environments, sources may be stale, noisy, inconsistent, or deliberately distracting.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Proactive-interaction task count differs between sections
MinorThe challenge-phenomena table lists six Proactive Interaction tasks, whereas the user-simulation validation says it uses 20 tasks involving proactive interaction.
“| Proactive Interaction | 6 (5.6%) |”
“For each of 20 tasks involving proactive interaction, we prepare 20 intermediate states and query each candidate user-simulating model.”
Best partial score is reported as both 54.2% and 54.8%
MinorThe cost-performance discussion calls 54.2% Opus 4.8's best partial score, but Table 3 and the main results report 54.8% for its best configuration.
“Opus 4.8's best of 54.2% at ∼225K.”
“Claude Opus 4.8 20.6 54.8 ∼$72.4 481.8 224K 103”
Opus 4.7 turn count is paired with the wrong completion rate
MinorThe text pairs roughly 190 turns with 18.2% completion. Table 3 assigns 18.2% to the batched run at 160.7 steps; the single-action run at 190.5 steps scores 13.9%.
“Claude Opus 4.7 needs ∼190 turns for 18.2%”
“Claude Opus 4.7 18.2 48.91 ∼$33.6 597.1 150K 160.7 GPT-5.5 13.0 49.5 ∼$25.5 149.8 37.1K 95.2 Single action Claude Opus 4.8 18.5 49.3 ∼$76.1 190.5 259.5K 190.5 Claude Opus 4.7 13.9 49.1 ∼$35.8 318.4 150.5K 318.4”
Citations
Cites
SeeClick: Harnessing GUI Grounding for Advanced Visual GUI Agents
Cheng, K., Sun, Q., Chu, Y., et al. (2024) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2401.10935 · Cited by 690
AgentDojo: A Dynamic Environment to Evaluate Prompt Injection Attacks and Defenses for LLM Agents
Debenedetti, E., Zhang, J., Balunović, M., Beurer-Kellner, L., Fischer, M., & Tramèr, F. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.13352 · Cited by 616
WebVoyager: Building an End-to-End Web Agent with Large Multimodal Models
He, H., Yao, W., Ma, K., Yu, W., Dai, Y., Zhang, H., Lan, Z., & Yu, D. (2024) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.371 · Cited by 549
AppAgent: Multimodal Agents as Smartphone Users
Zhang, C., Yang, Z., Liu, J., Li, Y., Han, Y., Chen, X., Huang, Z., Fu, B., & Yu, G. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713600 · Cited by 412
Self-citationTerminal-Bench: Benchmarking Agents on Hard, Realistic Tasks in Command Line Interfaces
Merrill, M. A., Shaw, A. G., Carlini, N., Li, B., Raj, H., Bercovich, I., Shi, L., Shin, J. Y., Walshe, T., Buchanan, E. K., et al. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.11868 · Cited by 392
Self-citationOS-ATLAS: A Foundation Action Model for Generalist GUI AgentsPreprint
Wu, Z., Wu, Z., Xu, F., Wang, Y., Sun, Q., Jia, C., Cheng, K., Ding, Z., Chen, L., Liang, P. P., et al. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.23218 · Cited by 342
GUI-R1 : A Generalist R1-Style Vision-Language Action Model For GUI AgentsPreprint
Luo, R., Wang, L., He, W., Chen, L., Li, J., & Xia, X. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.10458 · Cited by 260
Aguvis: Unified Pure Vision Agents for Autonomous GUI InteractionPreprint
Xu, Y., Wang, Z., Wang, J., Lu, D., Xie, T., Saha, A., Sahoo, D., Yu, T., & Xiong, C. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.04454 · Cited by 237
Self-citationCogAgent: A Visual Language Model for GUI Agents
Hong, W., Wang, W., Lv, Q., Xu, J., Yu, W., Ji, J., Wang, Y., Wang, Z., Dong, Y., Ding, M., et al. (2024) · 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.01354 · Cited by 202
GDPval: Evaluating AI Model Performance on Real-World Economically Valuable Tasks
Patwardhan, T., Dias, R., Proehl, E., Kim, G., Wang, M., Watkins, O., Fishman, S. P., Aljubeh, M., Thacker, P., Fauconnet, L., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.04374 · Cited by 189
OpenCUA: Open Foundations for Computer-Use Agents
Wang, X., Wang, B., Lu, D., Yang, J., Xie, T., Wang, J., Deng, J., Guo, X., Xu, Y., Wu, C., et al. (2025) · neural information processing systems · doi:10.52202/085713-4669 · Cited by 186
Self-citationInfiGUI-R1: Advancing Multimodal GUI Agents from Reactive Actors to Deliberative ReasonersPreprint
Liu, Y., Li, P., Xie, C., Hu, X., Han, X., Zhang, S., Yang, H., & Wu, F. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.14239 · Cited by 156
The BrowserGym Ecosystem for Web Agent ResearchPreprint
Chezelles, T. L. S. D., Gasse, M., Lacoste, A., Caccia, M., Boisvert, L., Thakkar, M., Marty, T., Assouel, R., Shayegan, S. O., Jang, L., et al. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.05467 · Cited by 154
Self-citationOpenCUA: Open Foundations for Computer-Use Agents
Wang, X., Wang, B., Lu, D.-J., et al. (2025) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.09123 · Cited by 153
Self-citationAndroidInTheWild: A Large-Scale Dataset For Android Device Control
Rawles, C., Lillicrap, T., Rodriguez, D., Riva, O., & Lillicrap, T. (2023) · neural information processing systems · doi:10.52202/075280-2609 · Cited by 142
Language Models can Solve Computer Tasks
Kim, G., Baldi, P., & McAleer, S. (2023) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 · doi:10.52202/075280-1723 · Cited by 137
(2023) · doi:10.52202/075280-1220 · Cited by 134
OS-Harm: A Benchmark for Measuring Safety of Computer Use Agents
Kuntz, T. M., Duzan, A., Zhao, H.-C., Croce, F., Kolter, Z., Flammarion, N., & Andriushchenko, M. (2025) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.14866 · Cited by 133
AssistantBench: Can Web Agents Solve Realistic and Time-Consuming Tasks?
Yoran, O., Amouyal, S. J., Malaviya, C., Bogin, B., Press, O., & Berant, J. (2024) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.505 · Cited by 124
WebShop: Towards Scalable Real-World Web Interaction with Grounded Language Agents
Yao, S., Chen, H., Yang, J., & Narasimhan, K. (2022) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 · doi:10.52202/068431-1508 · Cited by 107
Language Models can Solve Computer Tasks
Kim, G., Baldi, P., & McAleer, S. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.17491 · Cited by 101
OS-Harm: A Benchmark for Measuring Safety of Computer Use Agents
Kuntz, T., Duzan, A., Zhao, H., Croce, F., Kolter, J. Z., Flammarion, N., & Andriushchenko, M. (2025) · neural information processing systems · doi:10.52202/085713-1502 · Cited by 91
From Pixels to UI Actions: Learning to Follow Instructions via Graphical User Interfaces
Berant, J., Cohan, J., Hu, H., Joshi, M., Khandelwal, U., Lee, K., Pasupat, P., Shaw, P., & Toutanova, K. (2023) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.00245 · Cited by 89
ProgramBench: Can Language Models Rebuild Programs From Scratch?
Yang, J., Lieret, K., Ma, J., Thakkar, P., Pedchenko, D., Sootla, S., McMilin, E., Yin, P., Hou, R., Synnaeve, G., et al. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.03546 · Cited by 84
ALFWorld: Aligning Text and Embodied Environments for Interactive Learning
Shridhar, M., Yuan, X., Côté, M.-A., Bisk, Y., Trischler, A., & Hausknecht, M. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.03768 · Cited by 80
AndroidLab: Training and Systematic Benchmarking of Android Autonomous Agents
Xu, Y., Liu, X., Sun, X., Cheng, S., Yu, H., Lai, H., Zhang, S., Zhang, D., Tang, J., & Dong, Y. (2025) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.107 · Cited by 80
AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agents
Liu, X., Yu, H., Zhang, H., Xu, Y., Lei, X., Lai, H., Gu, Y., Ding, H., Men, K., Yang, K., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.03688 · Cited by 79
Self-citationLi, J., Zhao, W., Zhao, J., Zeng, W., Wu, H., Wang, X., Ge, R., Cao, Y., Huang, Y., Liu, W., et al. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.25726 · Cited by 77
Self-citationMobile-Bench: An Evaluation Benchmark for LLM-based Mobile AgentsPreprint
Deng, S., Xu, W.-K., Sun, H., Liu, W., Tan, T., Liu, J.-F., Li, A., Luan, J., Wang, B., Yan, R., et al. (2024) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.00993 · Cited by 75
Self-citationSWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?
Jimenez, C. E., Yang, J., Wettig, A., Yao, S., Pei, K., Press, O., & Narasimhan, K. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.06770 · Cited by 72
Qin, Y., Liang, S., Ye, Y., Zhu, K., Yan, L., Lu, Y., Lin, Y., Cong, X., Tang, X., Qian, B., et al. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2307.16789 · Cited by 71
Mobile-Bench: An Evaluation Benchmark for LLM-based Mobile Agents
Deng, S., Xu, W., Sun, H., Liu, W., Tan, T., Liujianfeng, L., Li, A., Luan, J., Wang, B., Yan, R., et al. (2024) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.478 · Cited by 70
Self-citationKong, Q., Zhang, X., Yang, Z., Gao, N., Liu, C., Tong, P., Cai, C., Zhou, H., Zhang, J., Chen, L., et al. (2026) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2026.acl-long.278 · Cited by 69
OSWorld: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Open-Ended Tasks in Real Computer Environments
Xie, T., Zhang, D., Chen, J., Li, X., Zhao, S., Cao, R., Hua, T. J., Cheng, Z., Shin, D., Lei, F., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.07972 · Cited by 64
Self-citationFerret-UI 2: Mastering Universal User Interface Understanding Across PlatformsPreprint
Li, Z., You, K., Zhang, H., Feng, D., Agrawal, H., Li, X., Moorthy, M. P. S., Nichols, J. A., Yang, Y., & Gan, Z. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.18967 · Cited by 52
Self-citationA3: Android Agent Arena for Mobile GUI Agents with Essential-State Procedural Evaluation
Chai, Y., Tang, S., Xiao, H., Lin, W., Li, H., Zhang, J., Liu, L., Zhao, P., Liu, G., Wang, G., et al. (2026) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2026.findings-acl.184 · Cited by 51
ShowUI: One Vision-Language-Action Model for GUI Visual Agent
Lin, K. Q., Li, L., Gao, D., Yang, Z., Wu, S., Bai, Z., Lei, S. W., Wang, L., & Shou, M. Z. (2025) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52734.2025.01816 · Cited by 51
WildClawBench: A Benchmark for Real-World, Long-Horizon Agent EvaluationPreprint
Ding, S., Dai, X., Xing, L., Ding, S., Liu, Z., Jingyi, 杨. Y., Yang, P., Zhang, Z., Wei, X., Fang, X., et al. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.10912 · Cited by 50
VisualWebArena: evaluating multimodal agents on realistic visual web tasks
Koh, J. Y., Lo, R., Jang, L., Duvvur, V., Lim, M., Huang, P.-Y., Neubig, G., Zhou, S., Salakhutdinov, R., & Fried, D. (2024) · Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.50 · Cited by 50
ScienceWorld: Is your Agent Smarter than a 5th Grader?
Wang, R., Jansen, P., Côté, M.-A., & Ammanabrolu, P. (2022) · Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.775 · Cited by 45
ScienceWorld: Is your Agent Smarter than a 5th Grader?
Wang, R., Jansen, P., Côté, M.-A., & Ammanabrolu, P. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.07540 · Cited by 45
MobileSafetyBench: Evaluating Safety of Autonomous Agents in Mobile Device ControlPreprint
Lee, J.-Y., Hahm, D., Choi, J. S., Knox, W. B., & Lee, K. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.17520 · Cited by 42
Ferret-UI: Grounded Mobile UI Understanding with Multimodal LLMs
You, K., Zhang, H., Schoop, E., Weers, F., Swearngin, A., Nichols, J., Yang, Y., & Gan, Z. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.05719 · Cited by 40
Self-citationCUA-Gym: Scaling Verifiable Training Environments and Tasks for Computer-Use AgentsPreprint
Wang, B., Lu, D., Wang, J., Bai, T., Liu, S., Zhang, Z., Wang, H., Hu, H., Xie, T., Bai, S., et al. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.25624 · Cited by 40
Self-citationRiOSWorld: Benchmarking the Risk of Multimodal Computer-Use Agents
Yang, J.-Y., Shao, S., Liu, D.-R., & Shao, J. (2025) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.00618 · Cited by 38
Self-citationRiOSWorld: Benchmarking the Risk of Multimodal Computer-Use Agents
Yang, J., Shao, S., Liu, D., & Shao, J. (2025) · neural information processing systems · doi:10.52202/085713-0286 · Cited by 36
Self-citationmacOSWorld: A Multilingual Interactive Benchmark for GUI Agents
Yang, P., Ci, H., & Shou, M. (2025) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.04135 · Cited by 34
WorldGUI: An Interactive Benchmark for Desktop GUI Automation from Any Starting PointPreprint
Zhao, H. H., Yang, K., Yu, W., Gao, D., & Shou, M. Z. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.08047 · Cited by 30
macOSWorld: A Multilingual Interactive Benchmark for GUI Agents
Yang, P., Ci, H., & Shou, M. Z. (2025) · neural information processing systems · doi:10.52202/085713-4468 · Cited by 28
ScreenSpot-Pro: GUI Grounding for Professional High-Resolution Computer Use
Li, K., Meng, Z., Lin, H., Luo, Z., Tian, Y., Ma, J., Huang, Z., & Chua, T.-S. (2025) · Proceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Multimedia · doi:10.1145/3746027.3755688 · Cited by 27
Measuring AI Ability to Complete Long Software Tasks
Kwa, T., West, B., Becker, J., Deng, A., Garcia, K., Hasin, M., Jawhar, S., Kinniment, M., Rush, N., Von Arx, S., et al. (2025) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 38 · doi:10.52202/085713-3086 · Cited by 21
DigiRL: Training In-The-Wild Device-Control Agents with Autonomous Reinforcement Learning
Bai, H., Zhou, Y., Cemri, M., Pan, J., Suhr, A., Levine, S., & Kumar, A. (2024) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 37 · doi:10.52202/079017-0397 · Cited by 20
VideoAgentTrek: Computer Use Pretraining from Unlabeled VideosPreprint
Lu, D., Xu, Y., Wang, J., Wu, H., Wang, X., Wang, Z., Yang, J., Su, H., Chen, J., Chen, J., et al. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.19488 · Cited by 20
Self-citationMobileWorldBench: Towards Semantic World Modeling For Mobile Agents
Li, S., Kallidromitis, K., Gokul, A., Kato, Y., Kozuka, K., & Grover, A. (2026) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/2026.emnlp-main.2401 · Cited by 20
DigiRL: Training In-The-Wild Device-Control Agents with Autonomous Reinforcement Learning
Bai, H., Zhou, Y., Cemri, M., Pan, J., Suhr, A., Levine, S., & Kumar, A. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.11896 · Cited by 20
TheAgentCompany: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Consequential Real World Tasks
Xu, F. F., Song, Y., Li, B., Tang, Y., Jain, K., Bao, M., Wang, Z. Z., Zhou, X., Guo, Z., Cao, M., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.14161 · Cited by 17
Self-citationAppWorld: A Controllable World of Apps and People for Benchmarking Interactive Coding Agents
Trivedi, H., Khot, T., Hartmann, M., Manku, R., Dong, V., Li, E., Gupta, S., Sabharwal, A., & Balasubramanian, N. (2024) · Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.850 · Cited by 14
Kapoor, S., Stroebl, B., Siegel, Z. S., Nadgir, N., & Narayanan, A. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.01502 · Cited by 13
Wornow, M., Narayan, A., Viggiano, B., Khare, I. S., Verma, T., Thompson, T., Hernandez, M., Sundar, S. S., Trujillo, C., Chawla, K., et al. (2024) · neural information processing systems · doi:10.52202/079017-3682 · Cited by 12
From Pixels to UI Actions: Learning to Follow Instructions via Graphical User Interfaces
Shaw, P., Joshi, M., Cohan, J., Berant, J., Pasupat, P., Hu, H., Khandelwal, U., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. N. (2023) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 · doi:10.52202/075280-1490 · Cited by 12
Wornow, M., Narayan, A., Viggiano, B., et al. (2024) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.13264 · Cited by 12
Kapoor, R., Butala, Y. P., Russak, M., Koh, J. Y., Kamble, K., AlShikh, W., & Salakhutdinov, R. (2025) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-73113-6_10 · Cited by 12
AppAgent: Multimodal Agents as Smartphone Users
Zhang, C., Yang, Z., Liu, J., Li, Y., Han, Y., Chen, X., Huang, Z., Fu, B., & Yu, G. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.13771 · Cited by 11
Self-citationGPT-4V(ision) is a Generalist Web Agent, if Grounded
Zheng, B., Gou, B., Kil, J., Sun, H., & Su, Y. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2401.01614 · Cited by 10
Self-citationMLAgentBench: Evaluating Language Agents on Machine Learning Experimentation
Huang, Q., Vora, J., Liang, P., & Leskovec, J. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.03302 · Cited by 9
$τ$-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domains
Yao, S., Shinn, N., Razavi, P., & Narasimhan, K. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.12045 · Cited by 9
MyPCBench: A Benchmark for Personally Intelligent Computer-Use AgentsPreprint
Jang, L., Jang, A. K., Koh, J. Y., & Salakhutdinov, R. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.16748 · Cited by 9
iOSWorld: A Benchmark for Personally Intelligent Phone AgentsPreprint
Jang, L., Woodside, M., Carom, G., Jang, A. K., Koh, J. Y., & Salakhutdinov, R. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.09764 · Cited by 8
MLE-bench: Evaluating Machine Learning Agents on Machine Learning Engineering
Chan, J. S., Chowdhury, N., Jaffe, O., Aung, J., Sherburn, D., Mays, E., Starace, G., Liu, K., Maksin, L., Patwardhan, T., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.07095 · Cited by 7
UI-TARS: Pioneering Automated GUI Interaction with Native Agents
Qin, Y., Ye, Y., Fang, J., Wang, H., Liang, S., Tian, S., Zhang, J., Li, J., Li, Y., Huang, S., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.12326 · Cited by 7
Self-citationAndroidControl-Curated: Revealing the True Potential of GUI Agents through Benchmark PurificationPreprint
Leung, H. F., Xi, X., & Zuo, F. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.18488 · Cited by 7
OS-Marathon: Benchmarking Computer-Use Agents on Vast-Horizon, Repetitive Tasks
Wu, J., Ai, W., Barretto, D., Chen, Y., Chen, Q., He, Y., Chawla, P., Gydé, N., Jian, Y., & Vineet, V. (2026) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/2026.emnlp-main.2493 · Cited by 7
Li, J., Li, Y., Zhao, C., Xu, Z., Hu, B., & Zhang, M. (2026) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2026.findings-acl.750 · Cited by 6
Self-citationAgent-SafetyBench: Evaluating the Safety of LLM Agents
Zhang, Z., Cui, S., Lu, Y., Zhou, J., Yang, J., Wang, H., & Huang, M. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.14470 · Cited by 6
CogAgent: A Visual Language Model for GUI AgentsPreprint
Hong, W., Wang, W., Lv, Q., et al. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.08914 · Cited by 6
SWE-Bench Pro: Can AI Agents Solve Long-Horizon Software Engineering Tasks?
Deng, X., Da, J., Pan, E., He, Y. Y., Ide, C., Garg, K., Lauffer, N., Park, A., Pasari, N., Rane, C., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.16941 · Cited by 4
AndroidWorld: A Dynamic Benchmarking Environment for Autonomous Agents
Rawles, C., Clinckemaillie, S., Chang, Y., Waltz, J., Lau, G., Fair, M., Li, A., Bishop, W., Li, W., Campbell-Ajala, F., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.14573 · Cited by 3
Windows Agent Arena: Evaluating Multi-Modal OS Agents at Scale
Bonatti, R., Zhao, D., Bonacci, F., Dupont, D., Abdali, S., Li, Y., Lu, Y., Wagle, J., Koishida, K., Bucker, A., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.08264 · Cited by 3
Self-citationWorkArena: How Capable Are Web Agents at Solving Common Knowledge Work Tasks?
Drouin, A., Gasse, M., Caccia, M., Laradji, I. H., Del Verme, M., Marty, T., Boisvert, L., Thakkar, M., Cappart, Q., Vazquez, D., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.07718 · Cited by 3
WebChoreArena: Evaluating Web Browsing Agents on Realistic Tedious Web Tasks
Miyai, A., Zhao, Z., Egashira, K., Sato, A., Sunada, T., Onohara, S., Yamanishi, H., Toyooka, M., Nishina, K., Maeda, R., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.01952 · Cited by 2
BrowseComp: A Simple Yet Challenging Benchmark for Browsing Agents
Wei, J., Sun, Z., Papay, S., McKinney, S., Han, J., Fulford, I., Chung, H. W., Passos, A. T., Fedus, W., & Glaese, A. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.12516 · Cited by 2
WebLINX: Real-World Website Navigation with Multi-Turn Dialogue
Lù, X. H., Kasner, Z., & Reddy, S. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.05930 · Cited by 2
Self-citationST-WebAgentBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Safety and Trustworthiness in Web Agents
Levy, I., Wiesel, B., Marreed, S., Oved, A., Yaeli, A., Mashkif, N., & Shlomov, S. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.06703 · Cited by 1
AutoGLM: Autonomous Foundation Agents for GUIsPreprint
Liu, X., Qin, B., Liang, D., Dong, G., Lai, H., Zhang, H., Zhao, H., Iong, I. L., Sun, J., Wang, J., et al. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.00820 · Cited by 1
Self-citationATBench: A Diverse and Realistic Agent Trajectory Benchmark for Safety Evaluation and DiagnosisPreprint
Li, Y., Luo, H., Xie, Y., Fu, Y., Yang, Z., Shao, S., Ren, Q., Qu, W., Fu, Y., Yang, Y., et al. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.02022 · Cited by 1
Self-citation$τ^2$-Bench: Evaluating Conversational Agents in a Dual-Control Environment
Barres, V., Dong, H., Ray, S., Si, X., & Narasimhan, K. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.07982 · Cited by 1
OfficeBench: Benchmarking Language Agents across Multiple Applications for Office Automation
Wang, Z., Cui, Y., Zhong, L., Zhang, Z., Yin, D., Lin, B. Y., & Shang, J. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.19056
AgentTrek: Agent Trajectory Synthesis via Guiding Replay with Web Tutorials
Xu, Y., Lu, D., Shen, Z., Wang, J., Wang, Z., Mao, Y., Xiong, C., & Yu, T. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.09605
Self-citationHolistic Agent Leaderboard: The Missing Infrastructure for AI Agent Evaluation
Kapoor, S., Stroebl, B., Kirgis, P., Nadgir, N., Siegel, Z. S., Wei, B., Xue, T., Chen, Z., Chen, F., Utpala, S., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.11977
Self-citationOS-MAP: How Far Can Computer-Using Agents Go in Breadth and Depth?Preprint
Chen, X., Chen, Y., Yuan, X., Peng, Z., Chen, L., Li, Y., Zhang, Z., Huang, Y., Huang, L., Liang, J., et al. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.19132
Self-citationAn Illusion of Progress? Assessing the Current State of Web Agents
Xue, T., Qi, W., Shi, T., Song, C. H., Gou, B., Song, D., Sun, H., & Su, Y. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.01382
Self-citationOSWorld-MCP: Benchmarking MCP Tool Invocation In Computer-Use AgentsPreprint
Jia, H., Liao, J., Zhang, X., Xu, H., Xie, T., Jiang, C., Yan, M., Liu, S., Ye, W., & Huang, F. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.24563
Self-citationAPEX-AgentsPreprint
Vidgen, B., Mann, A., Fennelly, A., Stanly, J. W., Rothman, L., Burstein, M., Benchek, J., Ostrofsky, D., Ravichandran, A., Sur, D., et al. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.14242
Kong, Q., Zhang, X., Yang, Z., Gao, N., Liu, C., Tong, P., Cai, C., Zhou, H., Zhang, J., Chen, L., et al. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.19432
AndroidLab: Training and Systematic Benchmarking of Android Autonomous AgentsPreprint
Xu, Y., Liu, X., Sun, X., Cheng, S., Yu, H., Lai, H., Zhang, S., Zhang, D., Tang, J., & Dong, Y. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.24024
ShowUI: One Vision-Language-Action Model for GUI Visual Agent
Lin, K. Q., Li, L., Gao, D., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.17465
A3: Android Agent Arena for Mobile GUI Agents with Essential-State Procedural Evaluation
Chai, Y., Tang, S., Xiao, H., Lin, W., Li, H., Zhang, J., Liu, L., Zhao, P., Liu, G., Wang, G., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.01149
Li, J., Li, Y., Zhao, C., Xu, Z., Hu, B., & Zhang, M. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.27776
Self-citationScreenSpot-Pro: GUI Grounding for Professional High-Resolution Computer Use
Li, K., Meng, Z., Lin, H., Luo, Z., Tian, Y., Ma, J., Huang, Z., & Chua, T.-S. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.07981
MobileWorldBench: Towards Semantic World Modeling For Mobile Agents
Li, S., Kallidromitis, K., Gokul, A., Kato, Y., Kozuka, K., & Grover, A. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.14014
OS-Marathon: Benchmarking Computer-Use Agents on Vast-Horizon, Repetitive Tasks
Wu, J., Ai, W., Barretto, D., Chen, Y., Chen, Q., He, Y., Chawla, P., Gydé, N., Jian, Y., & Vineet, V. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.20650
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Boyu Gou, Ruohan Wang, Boyuan Zheng, Yanan Xie, Cheng Chang, Yiheng Shu, Huan Sun, and Yu Su. Navigating the digital world as humans do: Universal visual grounding for GUI agents. In The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2025.
- Gregoire Mialon, Clementine Fourrier, Craig Swift, Thomas Wolf, Yann LeCun, and Thomas Scialom. GAIA: a benchmark for general AI assistants, 2023. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2311. 12983.
- Tianlin Shi, Andrej Karpathy, Linxi Fan, Jonathan Hernandez, and Percy Liang. World of Bits: An open-domain platform for web-based agents. In Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 3135-3144, 2017. URL https://proceedings.mlr.press/v70/shi17a.html.
- Olly Styles, Sam Miller, Patricio Cerda-Mardini, Tanaya Guha, Victor Sanchez, and Bertie Vidgen. WorkBench: a benchmark dataset for agents in a realistic workplace setting. In First Conference on Language Modeling, 2024. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=4HNAwZFDcH.
- Yiyou Sun, Xinyang Han, Weichen Zhang, et al. Agents' Last Exam, 2026. URL https://arxiv. org/abs/2606.05405.
- Bowen Wang, Xinyuan Wang, Jiaqi Deng, Tianbao Xie, Ryan Li, Yanzhe Zhang, Junli Wang, Dunjie Lu, Zicheng Gong, Gavin Li, et al. Computer Agent Arena: Toward human-centric evaluation and analysis of computer-use agents. In The Fourteenth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2026.
- Haoming Wang, Haoyang Zou, Huatong Song, Jiazhan Feng, Junjie Fang, Junting Lu, Longxiang Liu, Qinyu Luo, Shihao Liang, Shijue Huang, Wanjun Zhong, Yining Ye, Yujia Qin, Yuwen Xiong, Yuxin Song, Zhiyong Wu, Aoyan Li, Bo Li, Chen Dun, Chong Liu, et al. UI-TARS-2 technical report: Advancing GUI agent with multi-turn reinforcement learning, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2509.02544.
- John Yang, Carlos E. Jimenez, Alex L. Zhang, Kilian Lieret, Joyce Yang, Xindi Wu, Ori Press, Niklas Muennighoff, Gabriel Synnaeve, Karthik R. Narasimhan, Diyi Yang, Sida I. Wang, and Ofir Press. SWE-bench multimodal: Do AI systems generalize to visual software domains? In The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2025. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id= riTiq3i21b.
- Shuyan Zhou, Frank F. Xu, Hao Zhu, Xuhui Zhou, Robert Lo, Abishek Sridhar, Xianyi Cheng, Tianyue Ou, Yonatan Bisk, Daniel Fried, Uri Alon, and Graham Neubig. WebArena: A realistic web environment for building autonomous agents. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2024. Direct code/API/file strategy 96/108 (88.9%) 94/108 (87.0%) 103/108 (95.4%) 82/108 (75.9%) Human-style GUI strategy 73/108 (67.6%) 75/108 (69.4%) 29/108 (26.9%) 87/108 (80.6%) Hybrid GUI + code strategy 83/108 (76.9%) 84/108 (77.8%) 47/108 (43.5%) 75/108 (69.4%) GUI/visual grounding issue 66/108 (61.1%) 57/108 (52.8%) 22/108 (20.4%) 50/108 (46.3%) Loop/repeated recovery churn 103/108 (95.4%) 88/108 (81.5%) 61/108 (56.5%) 98/108 (90.7%) Planning or goal drift 88/108 (81.5%) 45/108 (41.7%) 52/108 (48.1%) 58/108 (53.7%) Final-state exactness failure 103/108 (95.4%) 97/108 (89.8%) 92/108 (85.2%) 91/108 (84.3%) Premature stop / false done 81/108 (75.0%) 84/108 (77.8%) 90/108 (83.3%) 86/108 (79.6%) Step/time exhaustion 34/108 (31.5%) 13/108 (12.0%) 1/108 (0.9%) 26/108 (24.1%) Scoring/environment mismatch 33/108 (30.6%) 46/108 (42.6%) 46/108 (42.6%) 43/108 (39.8%) Table 20: Mutually exclusive primary modes by model. Counts use 108 tasks per model. Primary mode MiniMax M3 Claude Sonnet 4.6 GPT-5.5 Claude Opus 4.7 Direct code/API/file 14/108 (13.0%) 18/108 (16.7%) 77/108 (71.3%) 15/108 (13.9%) Human GUI 12/108 (11.1%) 15/108 (13.9%) 5/108 (4.6%) 29/108 (26.9%) Hybrid 36/108 (33.3%) 67/108 (62.0%) 22/108 (20.4%) 51/108 (47.2%) Exploratory churn 46/108 (42.6%) 8/108 (7.4%) 3/108 (2.8%) 13/108 (12.0%) Other 0/108 (0.0%) 0/108 (0.0%) 1/108 (0.9%) 0/108 (0.0%) text and application metadata against these rules, and the highest-scoring rule is selected as the task's primary category. The LLM is used only to author and refine the rule set, so the final task-to-rule assignment is rule-based and reproducible. Mapping uncertainty is approximated from the strength of the rule match. Match scores are discretized into three confidence labels, namely high, medium, and low, corresponding respectively to unambiguous matches with multiple cues, partial matches with a single strong cue, and weak matches where no rule dominates. Tasks in the low bucket are typically generic file-management or formatting workflows that could reasonably belong to several occupation families. We use these labels as qualitative uncertainty indicators during mapping audit; they do not define a second economic-weighting scheme beyond the GDP proxy reported in Figure 5.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
LongHorizon-Harness: Advancing Long-Horizon Agents for Real-World TasksPreprint
Ma, Z., Huang, H., Zou, S., Wang, Y., Yang, S., Hu, Y., Wei, F., & Chu, X. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.01964 · Cited by 18
Qwen-UI-Agent Technical Report: Toward Next-Generation Real-World Centric Foundation GUI AgentsPreprint
Zhou, H., Tong, P., Zhang, X., Kong, Q., Cai, C., Xia, T., Zhang, G., Zhang, J., Li, L., Chen, L., et al. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.28227 · Cited by 17
Qwen-CUA: Native Computer Use for (almost) EverythingPreprint
Lu, D., Bai, S., Bai, T., Fan, S., Gao, C., Guan, J., Hu, F., Huang, M., Huang, X., Jiang, Y., et al. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.02352 · Cited by 15
Self-citationRSIAgent: Autonomous Exploration for Recursive Self-improvement in New EnvironmentsPreprint
Zhu, S.-B., Fan, S.-C., Wang, X.-Y., Wu, W.-Y., Zhou, K., & Huang, B.-W. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.15364 · Cited by 12
Self-citationUI-Venus-2 Technical ReportPreprint
Venus Team, Cai, Z., Chen, H., Chen, J., Chen, W., :, Gu, Z., Guo, Y., Hu, Y., Jiang, J., et al. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.00028 · Cited by 10
Self-citationUI-Mate: Advancing Open-Weight Foundation GUI Agents with In-Context DemonstrationsPreprint
Ding, Z., Dou, L., Gao, Q., Guo, X., Hu, S., Huang, Z., Jiang, Z., Ke, L., Lan, M., Lei, W., et al. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.15930 · Cited by 8
CUA-Universe: A Scalable and Dynamic Environment for Hybrid GUI+CLI AgentsPreprint
Shi, H., Wang, W., Fang, W., Liang, Y., Jin, T., Zhao, P., Liu, G., Chen, S., & Wang, Y. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.05374 · Cited by 7
StateAct: Program State, before Pixels, for Long-Horizon Computer-Use AgentsPreprint
Yang, Y., Jian, X., Luo, Z., Zhao, Z., Dai, Y., Shi, Z., Yan, H., Liew, J. H., Savarese, S., & Li, J. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.22798 · Cited by 6
Self-citationMerchantBench: Benchmarking LLM Agents for Long-Term Coherence in E-Commerce OperationsPreprint
Shi, Q., Tao, Y., Jin, L., Kang, Z., Dou, Y., Zhu, J., Pan, T., Fu, S., Wang, C., Li, S., et al. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.28956 · Cited by 6
Liu, G., Zhao, P., Wu, G., Yin, Y., Li, M., Liu, L., Liu, C., Qi, 张. Z., Wang, M., Guo, L., et al. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.19930 · Cited by 5
OneDayAgent: Towards a Long-Horizon Harness for Autonomous AgentsPreprint
Zheng, J., Fang, X., Zhang, J., Gui, Z., Chen, H., & Zhang, N. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.05013 · Cited by 5
How Benchmarks Mis-Score Computer-Use AgentsPreprint
Dong, Z., Ma, Z., Wang, Z., Li, Y., Liu, Z., Deng, R., Zhan, Q., & Qian, R. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.28367 · Cited by 4
Self-citationCADWorld: Computer-Use Benchmark for Long-Horizon Computer-Aided DesignPreprint
Dong, Z., Liu, Y., Ma, Z., Zhan, Q., Kong, D., Li, G., & Li, K. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.16251 · Cited by 4
Zhou, J., Zhao, Y., Bao, Q. D., Cao, J., Chen, Z., Gao, C., Guo, K., Guo, M., Li, M., Lu, X., et al. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.27155 · Cited by 3
Self-citationSeekJudge: A Practical Reward Framework for Reinforcement Learning in Computer-Use AgentsPreprint
Wan, Y., Zhang, Z., Wang, J., Zhu, L., & Zhu, L. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.23263 · Cited by 2
PersonaCUABench: Benchmarking Computer-Use Agents Serving Diverse PersonasPreprint
Li, H., Cao, D., Hu, X., Luo, Y., Wang, Y., Xu, X., He, J., Jiang, W., Zhang, Y., Zhao, Y., et al. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.22990 · Cited by 2
Unified Context Evolution for LLM Agents
Zhu, Z., Hu, Y., Dai, Y., Fang, J., Jiang, C., Hu, S., & Zhao, Y. (2026) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/2026.emnlp-main.2188 · Cited by 1
An Exam for Active ObserversPreprint
Zhang, J., Tao, M., Wang, S., Liu, O., Ma, X., & Neiswanger, W. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.16165 · Cited by 1
Men, T., Jin, Z., Liu, K., & Zhao, J. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.24720 · Cited by 1
The Agent Loop: A Survey of Control Strategies, Skills, and Harnesses for LLM AgentsPreprint
Lee, J., & Park, C. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7186738 · Cited by 1
When Intelligence Becomes Agency: A Theory of Governed, Proactive Agency for Symbiotic AI SystemsPreprint
Ferreira, J. D. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.07741 · Cited by 1
EchoPath: Execution-Level Replayable Memory for GUI AgentsPreprint
Zhao, Y., Shanmugham, A., Roy, S., & Xu, Y. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.16635 · Cited by 1
RADAR: Readiness for AI Discovery and Agentic ReachPreprint
Jordan, L., Peixoto, T. C., & Ramos-Maqueda, M. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.28480 · Cited by 1
Neuro-Symbolic Computer Use: Learning Reusable Policies for Reliable and Efficient ExecutionPreprint
Suh, H., Nguyen, T. M., Lee, C.-L., Hartman, D., Liu, L., Wang, X. E., Li, A., & Yang, J. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.36927 · Cited by 1
Self-citationcua-speedrun: Standardized Benchmarking of the Speed of Computer-Use AgentsPreprint
Aggarwal, P., Jang, L., Welleck, S., Fried, D., Salakhutdinov, R., & Koh, J. Y. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.40284 · Cited by 1
The World Won't Wait: Evaluating and Teaching Agents Under a Live ClockPreprint
Pan, N., Li, H., Shen, Y., Ding, N., Tang, Y., & Zhang, W. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.20665 · Cited by 1
Don't Forget What You Just Learned: Self-Directed Repair Turns Agent Mistakes Into Lasting LessonsPreprint
Kansal, Y., Ullrich, K., Kirichenko, P., Kulikov, I., Jha, N. K., Pezeshki, M., & Ibrahim, M. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.31846 · Cited by 1
Kimi K3: Open Frontier Intelligence
Kimi Team, Bai, T., Bai, Y., Bao, Y., C., M., Cai, J., Cai, X., Cao, P., Cao, Y., Chai, Z., et al. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.24653
“…AA-Briefcase [8, 2], Agents’ Last Exam (ALE) [4, 117], APEX-Agents [129], OfficeQA Pro [88], SpreadsheetBench 2 [152], OSWorld-Verified [138] and OSWorld 2.0 [145], SaaS-Bench [110], τ 3 -Banking [1, 8], Harvey Lab-AA [8, 43], CorpFin v2 [21], Finance Agent v2 [35], and Legal Research Bench [66].”
InfluentialSelf-citationDesktop-Delta Bench: Do Computer-Use Models Understand Desktop GUI Transitions?Preprint
Pillai, A., Nayak, S. K., & Chen, Y. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.26041
Gupta, V. P. A. (2026) · Iconic Research and Engineering Journals · doi:10.64388/irev10i2-1722568
Benchmarking General Mobile Assistants in Challenging Real-World ScenariosPreprint
Zhu, Y., Gao, F., Fan, J., Zeng, J., Wu, M., Li, C., Xu, H., Li, P., Yan, M., & Liu, Y. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.27477
Solaris: Towards Interfaces That Are Generated, Not CodedPreprint
Alaluf, Y., Avrahami, O., Leshem, G. B., Geyer, M., Goldberg, K., Richardson, E., Alarcón, D., Alvarez, A., Garry, C., Germanidis, A., et al. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.00776
Chen, Y., Yang, Z., Zhu, J., Huang, Q., An, R., Xu, P., Yang, H., Liu, R., Gong, C., Cao, Z., et al. (2026) · doi:10.31224/8364
Beyond Task Completion: Training Capable and Safe Computer-Use AgentsPreprint
Kang, Z., Yin, Z., Zhang, Y., He, S., Lei, S., Zhong, Y., Chen, X., & Wang, Y. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.22178
DynBranch: Speculative Subgraph Reuse for Dynamic Agentic LLM ServingPreprint
Shen, J., Wadlom, N., Su, Z., & Lu, Y. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.31047
On the Behavioral Traits of LLM AgentsPreprint
Zhao, H., Gao, J., Xiao, Y., Wang, X., Xuan, W., Joshi, A., Dredze, M. H., & Huang, J.-T. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.32776
Self-citationCUA-Sandbox: Efficient Environments for Computer-Use Agent Reinforcement LearningPreprint
Yan, X., Jiao, Z., Liu, J., Wan, Z., Ma, S., Yu, X., Jiang, T., Zhang, C., Zhou, P., Zhao, W., et al. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.32750
Self-citationDoes Learning to Predict the World Help Agents Act? Auditing World-Model Post-TrainingPreprint
Che, X., Yan, H., Liu, Y., Liu, H., Li, R., Shi, A., Wang, H., & Liu, J. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.33335
Relevance Does Not Imply Applicability: Experience Activation for Personal GUI AgentsPreprint
Zhang, F., Wang, X., Li, Z., Zhang, J., Huang, L., & Lim, W. Y. B. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.33304
Self-citationThe GUI Is Not the State: Diagnosing State Aliasing in GUI World ModelsPreprint
Liu, D., Jin, C., Yang, W., Wang, H., Yang, J., Zhang, Z., Chen, Z., Huang, H., Cao, J., & He, R. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.32679
Self-citationBeyond Skill Evolution: Self-Evolving Context Management Policies for Long-Horizon Agent HarnessesPreprint
Li, W.-Y., Xu, J.-H., Chen, A.-L., Wang, X.-T., Liang, S., Liang, J.-Q., & Yang, D.-Q. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.34649
Self-citationEngiWorld: What Can Frontier Agents Deliver in Professional Engineering Environments?Preprint
Gao, H., Qu, H., Lei, Y., Sun, H., Li, H., Wei, Y., Xue, N., Yu, X., Tao, Z., Zang, Y., et al. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.37686
Self-citationSCOUT: Synergizing Reasoning and Tool-Use for Computer-Use SafetyPreprint
Chen, J., Yu, X., Agrawal, S., & Yu, Z. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.36201
Self-citationLoGRA: Scaling LLM Reinforcement Learning with Low-Rank Gradient SketchesPreprint
Zhang, S., Zhang, Y., Hu, J., Li, Y., Zhang, H., Xu, B., Kautz, J., & Dong, Y. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.06647
Self-citationMedImageOSWorld: Benchmarking GUI Agents for Medical Image ConsolesPreprint
Long, Z., Li, X., Xing, L., & Yang, H.-J. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.04800
CUAWright: A Minimal Unified Interface for Digital AgentsPreprint
Lu, Y., Lee, T., Li, Y., Jang, L., Xue, T., Su, Y., Sun, H., & Awadallah, A. H. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.04116
Self-citationControl OSWorld: An AI Control Environment for GUI Computer Use AgentsPreprint
del Rio, M. S., & Terekhov, M. V. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.03818
World Editing: Intervening on Executable Worlds at Increasing DepthPreprint
Ku, M., Law, N.-K., Tang, Y.-C., Yeh, S.-Y., Nie, P., Zheng, A., Lai, T. H., Chen, F.-Y., Yu, N., Sun, W.-C., et al. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University)
AgentTime: Can Agents Estimate and Control Their Own Runtime?Preprint
Ofengenden, M., & Andriushchenko, M. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.09944
Mine Odyssey: Benchmarking Spatial Agentic Intelligence in the WildPreprint
Cao, Y., Li, J., Li, H., & He, J. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.11328
Learn from Move: the Next Step for GUI AgentsPreprint
Lu, J., Shen, Y., Tan, C., Huang, M., Fang, S., Chen, X., Zheng, Y., Wang, Y., & Qiu, X. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.16720
AutoEnvScaling: Automating the Data Flywheel with Terminal AgentsPreprint
Yu, S., Peng, B., Liu, B., Shi, Z., Wang, Z., Cheng, H., Wu, Q., Yao, W., Jaques, N., Shi, W., et al. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.14163
Pack Light, CarryOn: Building Object-Oriented Context for Long-Horizon AgentsPreprint
Lu, Y., McAuley, J., & Zhang, L. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.18784
Li, Y., Chen, J., Zhou, Q., Yang, R., ZhangLiujie, & Chen, W. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.19948
Self-citationKolab: Benchmarking Human-Agent Collaboration in Long-Horizon WorkflowsPreprint
Hayati, S. A., Setiani, P. A., Wang, R., Li, Z., Lê, K. C., Lee, Y., & Kang, D. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.21109
Tong, P., Kong, Q., Li, P., Xia, T., Zhou, H., Wang, L., Cai, C., Li, L., Chen, L., Zhang, J., et al. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.20939
OpenGCUA: Toward a Fully Open Stack for Generalist Computer UsePreprint
Zhou, H., Li, L., Kong, Q., Wang, L., Tong, P., Chen, L., Xia, T., Zhang, G., Zhang, X., Liu, C., et al. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University)
CUA-Lite: An Open Platform for Computer Use AgentsPreprint
Zhou, Z., Zhang, W., Liu, H., Chen, L., Shi, T., Lin, K., Yang, Z., Wang, L., & Song, D. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.26071
Self-citationAgent World Model in the Wild: Computer-Use Agent Environment SynthesisPreprint
Wang, Z., Wu, Q., Wang, H., Yu, S., Peng, B., Xu, C., Cheng, H., Yao, W., Liu, B., Wang, Y., et al. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.26828
Focused Omni-Modal GUI AgentsPreprint
Zhang, F., He, W., Zhang, J., Hao, Y., Wang, X., Guan, G., Wang, C., Huang, L., & Lim, W. Y. B. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.26203
Self-citationDesign Anything, Design at ScalePreprint
Ren, X., Feng, S., Huang, J., Yao, Y., Wang, J., Wang, L. A., Chen, A., Yuan, H., Feng, T., Wu, Q., et al. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.24771
CUA-Recovery: Benchmarking Error Recovery in Long-Horizon Computer-Use AgentsPreprint
Hu, X., Li, H., Wang, Y., Yang, J., Li, K., Wang, L., Kang, D., Song, J., Wang, T., Hu, Z., et al. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.27645
Self-citationEvolving Agent InterfacesPreprint
Agashe, S., Yang, Y., Gonzalez-Pumariega, G., Koduru, B. C., Li, C.-L., Yang, J., Li, A., & Wang, X. E. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.28601
Self-citationMultimodal Embodied Agents: A Unified Capability-centric Perspective from Computer-Use to Robot-UsePreprint
Chen, Y., Yang, Z., Zhu, J., Huang, Q., An, R., Xu, P., Yang, H., Liu, R., Gong, C., Cao, Z., et al. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.30108
Deep Search in Real-World Web EnvironmentsPreprint
Yu, X., Chen, H., Huang, Z., Yan, S., Shao-rong, S., Ma, X., Wang, F., Chen, J., Fang, J., Yan, Y., et al. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.30181
Self-citationDual Exam: Controlled Evaluation of Multimodal Agents and World ModelsPreprint
Rao, Z., Chu, M., Zhang, X., Chen, J., Cai, G., Li, R., Du, S., Huang, X., Lu, N., Chen, Z., et al. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.31066
Self-citationPoeltl, J., Yen, T., Shea, P., Varma, S. A., Rastogi, D., Chen, Z., Zhang, M., & Namkoong, H. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.31711
OS-Wizard: Scaling Computer-Using Agents to Specialized Software via Knowledge-Guided ExplorationPreprint
Liu, Z., Ding, Z., Yang, B., Li, Z., Wu, Z., Zhao, Y., 陳侃智, Wang, Y., Sun, Y., Sun, Q., et al. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.33907
iPrefBench: A User-Centric Benchmark for Personalized Mobile Use AgentsPreprint
Ning, Y., Cheng, R., Ghosh, S., Duan, P., Lin, H., Sundararajan, A., Pandey, S., Sun, H., Nichols, J. W., & Schoop, E. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.34735
Work Agents: Systems, Capabilities, and OptimizationPreprint
Xu, Z., Du, E., Gao, M., Yang, C., Shen, J., Chen, Z., Yao, Z., Guo, Y., Lu, Y., Huang, J., et al. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.35845
GEPA-Curator: Curated Learning for Self Improving AgentsPreprint
Yu, Z., Lee, N., Lee, M., Agarwal, L., Manolache, L., Kang, W., Zaharia, M., Mahoney, M. W., Keutzer, K., Kim, S., et al. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.37651
Self-citationAutoVend: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Long-Horizon Autonomous Vending OperationsPreprint
Shi, Q., Li, Y., Luan, B., Sun, R., Wang, S., Wang, D., Ma, Y., Li, J., Jiang, D., & Bai, Z. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.36980
Self-citationBeyond Final Success: Semantic Progress Diagnostics for Agent Trajectory Evaluation
Xue, N., Wang, T., & Tang, L. (2026) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/2026.emnlp-main.2140
Kadu, A., Gopal, A., Singh, D. N., Jain, A., & Krishnan, A. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.40246
Hybrid Computer Use: A Unified Programmatic, Semantic, and Visual Interface for General AgentsPreprint
Wang, H., Zhang, X., Fan, S., Zhang, Z., Zhang, X., Li, J., Li, B., & Lu, Y. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.41432
CUA-Master: Scaling Computer-use Agents through Open-World Recursive ImprovementsPreprint
Yu, X., Li, G., Zhao, J., Chen, Z., Wang, C., Dong, S., Peng, Z., Xu, Y., Wu, H., Tuo, K., et al. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2611.03126
Self-citationHarder Than the Task: From Technical to Organizational Difficulty in AI BenchmarkingPreprint
Barres, V., Barton, A., Foss, N. J., & Nielsen, H. M. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2611.03494
Just-in-Time Skill Retrieval via Long-Horizon State TrackingPreprint
Lin, X., Wang, Z., Chen, Z., Ma, J., Wei, Z., Liu, B., Zhan, B., Zhang, Q., & Su, J. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2611.01701
Metadata
- Authors
- Yuan, M., Zhou, Z., Xiong, X., Wu, W., Sun, J., Song, J., Cui, K., Wang, B., Wu, H., Li, Y., Lu, D., Lu, H., Zhen, Q., Wang, X., Deng, J., Yang, Y., Chen, C., Zheng, B., Su, A., Yu, X., Zou, H., Agashe, S., Lu, X. H., Kaur, M., Qi, Z., Chen, V. S., Sala, F., Liu, D., Lin, J., Yu, Z., Su, Y., Reddy, S., Wang, X. E., Qi, P., Xie, T., & Yu, T.
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2026
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2606.29537
- OpenAlex
- W7166727921
- Semantic Scholar
- 91522113ac6b81e4b6acdab8a8e612557d53449c
- Cited by
- 79
- References
- 66
- Citations by year
- 2026: 79
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Ohio State University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
- Keywords
- LLM agents, user interface interaction, dynamic environments, agent safety, Claude Opus, GPT-5.5, user profile data, task completion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-08, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-08 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review