Cited by 16Occupational Therapy Practice and ResearchSystemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchCancer survivorship and care

Effectiveness of Occupational Therapy Interventions for Adults With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Systematic Review

Poole, Janet L., Bradford, Joshua D., Siegel, Patricia·2019·American Journal of Occupational Therapy

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. Our objective was to assess the efficacy of occupational therapy–related interventions for adults with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHOD. We reviewed intervention studies published from 2000 to 2017. The method used for conducting the review was based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The PEDro scale was used to evaluate methodological quality. Risk of bias was appraised with methods described by the Cochrane Methods Group. RESULTS. The final analysis included 20 studies (10 physical activity and 10 psychoeducational). Moderate evidence supports physical activity to improve depression, fatigue, exercise tolerance, and function without exacerbation of disease symptoms. Strong evidence supports psychoeducational interventions using cognitive–behavioral approaches to improve pain, depression, anxiety, perceived stress, quality of life, and function. Moderate evidence supports patient education and self-management interventions for pain, depression, anxiety, perceived stress, quality of life, and function. CONCLUSION. Further research on occupation-based interventions for people with SLE is needed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5014/ajot.2019.030619

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Poole, J. L., Bradford, J. D., & Siegel, P.
Affiliations
  • University of New Mexico (US)
  • Joshua D. Bradford, MOT, OTR/L, is Occupational Therapist, Manzano del Sol, Albuquerque, NM, and La Vida Llena, Albuquerque, NM
Corresponding author
Poole, Janet L.
Venue
American Journal of Occupational Therapy
Published
2019-06-14
Volume
73
Issue
4
Pages
572-592
ISSN
  • 0272-9490 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-7676
OpenAlex
W2744735737
Cited by
16
References
53
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Occupational Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UNM’s Digital Repository (University of New Mexico) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
systemic lupus erythematosus, occupational therapy intervention, physical activity, psychoeducational intervention, cognitive behavioral therapy, patient education, self-management, depression, fatigue, pain, anxiety, perceived stress, quality of life, functional capacity
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Fatigue, Humans, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic, Occupational Therapy, Quality of Life

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review