Cited by 117Disability Rights and RepresentationAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchMental Health and Psychiatry

Neurodiversity Theory and Its Discontents: Autism, Schizophrenia, and the Social Model of Disability

Chapman, Robert·2019·The Bloomsbury Companion to Philosophy of Psychiatry

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5040/9781350024090.ch-018

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Proponents of the neurodiversity movement maintain that autism (and other forms of neurocognitive differences like ADHD and dyslexia) are simply dimensions of the rich diversity of the human experience, characterized by a different means of experiencing, processing, understanding, and interacting with the world.

    “Proponents of the neurodiversity movement, on the other hand, maintain that autism (and other forms of neurocognitive differences like ADHD and dyslexia) are simply dimensions of the rich diversity of the human experience, characterized by a different means of experiencing, processing, understanding, and interacting with the world (Chapman, 2019).”

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chapman, R.
Corresponding author
Chapman, Robert
Venue
The Bloomsbury Companion to Philosophy of Psychiatry
Published
2019
Pages
371-390
OpenAlex
W2964791169
Cited by
117
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
neurodiversity, autism spectrum disorder, schizophrenia, social model of disability, disability theory, neurodiversity-affirmative approach

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review